• About

Pumpkin Person

~ The psychology of horror

Pumpkin Person

Monthly Archives: May 2018

IQ and taste in movies

30 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 196 Comments

I’ve always wondered about the correlation between IQ and media preferences.  If you asked someone what their 10 favorite movies are and then scored them based on sophistication, the scores would probably be positively correlated with IQ, though I doubt the correlation would be more than +0.5 since some smart people like dumb entertainment (The Jerry Springer show was popular among Oxford students) and a lot of other factors like nostalgia play a role.

You can probably infer a lot of other things from the top 10 list beyond just IQ, such as personality and even psychiatric conditions like autism, depression and schizophrenia.

Here’s my own top ten list:

1.  Halloween (1978)

2. Friday the 13th (1980)

3. Carrie (1976)

4. The Sweet Hereafter (1997)

5. American Beauty (1999)

6. Silent Night Deadly Night (1984)

7. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

8. Creepshow (1982)

9. Quest for Fire (1981)

10. The Breakfast Club (1985)

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

New paper claims to have solved the missing heritability problem

30 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 179 Comments

[No off-topic comments please. Go to open thread]

This is going to send commenter RR into panic mode.

A new paper claims to have found molecular genetic evidence that IQ is every bit as heritable as twin studies show.

The paper’s quite complex and there are some people here who no matter how many times they read it, will never be able to understand it.  They simply don’t have the physiological genetic brain power to process such complex reading material.

And sadly one of those people is Mug of Pee.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Roseanne’s show cancelled after star implies Valerie Jarrett is a monkey

29 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 17 Comments

 

roseanne3

Roseanne and her TV husband Dan

 

[Please place all off-topic comments in the open thread. They will not be published here.]

It seemed like just yesterday that I was blogging about the return of the Roseanne show and this afternoon I got a frantic text message telling me it’s been cancelled, despite massive ratings.  Apparently on twitter she implied Barack Obama’s African American assistant Valerie Jarret is a monkey:

ape4

 

Although the anti-black slur is what got her fired, I suspect what really angered Roseanne about Jarret was the fact that she was born in Iran, yet had President Obama’s ear.  This is anathema to the wildly pro-Israel Roseanne who recently thanked her hero President Trump for moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.  So powerful are ethnic genetic interests that Roseanne has now derailed her big TV comeback just to advance hers.

I wonder what the rest of the cast (who must be so grateful to be back on TV) were thinking when they got the news: “What do you mean we’re cancelled? It’s the highest rated sitcom in years?  We’re cancelled because she said ‘what?'”

Bog Iger (the CEO of Disney company which owns ABC, the network that broadcasts Roseanne) said  “There was only one thing to do here, and that was the right thing.”  Iger is the seventh most influential living human of all time.

Jaret agreed.

Apparently this wasn’t the first time Roseanne had implied a black woman is an ape, having made a similar tweet about Obama aid Suzanne Rice.

ape3

For those who have admired Roseanne for decades, this whole issue is very sad.  Like Oprah who came before her, Roseanne was a trailblazer for overweight women especially those from the lower class.   Given the huge audience of the show, I wonder if another network or streaming service will dare pick it up.

Of course we should have seen this coming. Back in April, there was a scene on Roseanne’s sitcom where they fell asleep on the couch and missed all the minority lead sitcoms that evening.  Roseanne’s character (also named Roseanne) turned to her husband Dan and said “they’re just like us. There, you’re all caught up.”

It was a dismissive way of implying these shows had nothing to say that couldn’t be summed up in a few words, and it raised eyebrows at the time.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Open thread, week ending June 2, 2018

28 Monday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 462 Comments

Please place all off-topic comments in this thread, they will not be posted in the main articles

I still plan on posting about sex differences in IQ, but we begin each week with an open thread.

So I hear they’re coming out with another Halloween film this fall.  This picks up right after the original 1978 film, ignoring all the sequels and remakes.

Jamie Lee Curtis is reprising her role as the iconic Laurie Strode, 40 years later.

Growing up Halloween was not just a movie, it was a religion.

When I was about 11, my best friend and I watched the original Halloween almost every day for an entire month.  I haven’t seen it in decades but can still recite it word for word.  My friend and I would put on our Michael Myers masks scaring much older teenager aged girls by standing behind hedges, just like Myers did in this powerful scene:

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Revised conversion of new GRE to IQ: Part 3

26 Saturday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 60 Comments

[off-topic comments will only be published in the open thread]

So in part 1 of this series we learned that Americans who take the new GRE have the following scores: Verbal 152.7 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), Quant 150.2 (SD = 7.8), and Combined 302.9 (SD = 13.6)

In part 2 we learned that Americans who take the new GRE have the following IQs: Verbal 117 (SD = 13.5), Math 117 (SD = 13.3) and Combined 119 (SD = 13.2), on a scale where all Americans score 100 (SD = 15).

Mapping the verbal, quant and combined GRE scores to their IQ counterparts, new GRE scores can be equated to IQ as follows:

Verbal IQ = 1.776(new GRE Verbal) – 154.243

Quant IQ = 1.705(new GRE Math) – 139.11

Combined IQ = 0.971(new GRE Combined) – 174.991

All IQs are calculated based on U.S. norms which is standard on official IQ tests like the WAIS-IV.  To convert to U.S. white norms which are sometimes used in international research, see here.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Revised conversion of new GRE to IQ: Part 2

25 Friday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

[No off-topic comments in this article will be published. Post off-topic comments in the most recent open thread]

Commenter Mary has been bugging me to continue my revised new GRE series:

 

In today’s class, we’ll estimate the average IQ of Americans who take the GRE (and by proxy other graduate school admission tests like the LSAT, GMAT, and MCAT).

In a study of  22,923 students who took the GRE circa 1984 and the SAT circa 1979.5, the following SAT scores were observed: Verbal 518.8 (SD = 104.7) and Math 556 (SD = 110.2).  The combined SAT scores were not reported, but by summing the Verbal and Math means, we can estimate the combined mean was 1074.8 and from the 0.628 correlation between the SAT Math and Verbal in this sample, we can estimate the combined SAT had an SD of 193.9 in that sample.

In order to convert these SAT scores to IQ equivalents, we need to know how all U.S. 17 year olds would have scored on the SAT in 1979.5, including the many who dropped out long before graduating from high school, or even elementary school.

I don’t know how all U.S. 17-year olds would have scored on the SAT in 1979.5, but the nearest year for which I have good data is 1983, and that year, all U.S. 17-year-olds would have scored Verbal 376 (SD = 116), Math 411 (SD = 124) and combined 787 (SD = 220).  If we convert those three distributions to the IQ scale (mean = 100; SD = 15), then GRE takers had the following IQs: Verbal 118 (SD = 13.5), Math 118 (SD = 13.3) and Combined 120 (SD = 13.2) (U.S. norms).

Postscript:

It’s worth noting that the above stats are quite dated.  In the 20th century, a smaller percentage of people graduated from college and thus took the GRE.  For example in the 1995 norming of the WAIS-III, Americans with 16+ years of education had a median full-scale IQ of 112 (see table 8) but in the 2006 norming of the WAIS-IV, the mean is about 111 (see table 4.1); a drop of one point as university has become more democratized.

Thus people who took the new GRE probably have IQs about one point lower, so for these I would estimate the following IQs: Verbal 117 (SD = 13.5), Math 117 (SD = 13.3) and Combined 119 (SD = 13.2).

Now that we know the IQ distribution of Americans who take the GRE, converting their GRE scores to IQ is easy.  And we will take that final step in part 3.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Open thread week ending May 26, 2018

21 Monday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 542 Comments

Please post all off-topic comments for the week in this thread.  They will not be posted in the main articles.

Sorry for the delayed open thread (they’re normally posted every Sunday) but I’ve been extremely busy.  If all goes well (keep your fingers crossed) I’ll be leading the opening of a new office, and have been busy hiring local staff, finding an apartment that’s close to work, all while trying to get citizenship or at least a visa.  Nothing like moving to a different location to test your ability to adapt.  It tests social IQ (learning the etiquette of a different culture), verbal IQ (ability to rapidly learn a new language), spatial IQ (ability to find your way around), math IQ (converting currencies).

Can’t wait to test the locals, and I’m creating the first truly culture reduced test of conceptual ability.

And apologies  for not posting about the GRE or sex differences yet since I was too busy to post any main articles last week, but I’ll likely get to it this week (if the username who asked me to post about it is still around)

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Arctic Skin Color and the Vitamin D Hypothesis by Race Realist

15 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 330 Comments

[Note from Pumpkin Person: The following is a guest article written by Race Realist and does not necessarily reflect the view of Pumpkin Person.  Please place all off-topics in the most recent open thread.  They will not be posted here]

The Vitamin D Hypothesis (VDH) purports to explain the range of skin colors observed between races/ethnies around the world. Since there are little UVR and even less vitamin-D-producing UVB in the northern hemisphere, other ways of producing/getting ample amounts of vitamin D were imperative for survival. Locations such as the far north were uninhabited up until 12,000 years ago—the explanation being that populations didn’t have the culture to survive such harsh conditions (see Goebel, 1999; Bergman et al, 2004). However, a more likely reason was that there were biological limits on the production of vitamin D due to the lack of UVB rays for most of the year. In this article, I will discuss the skin color of Arctic peoples and why it does not follow the simple gradient of UVB around the world.

To overcome the biological limitations of little to no UVB throughout the year, they needed to supplement with foods to get ample amounts of vitamin D—to cover what they did not get from the weak UVB rays. To overcome the limitation of their environment and vitamin D production, they had to consume fatty animals who had ample stores of vitamin D in their systems. The types of foods allowed peoples to live so far north, since there were little vitamin-D-producing UVB rays, lifestyle and culture is how we conquered the unforgiving far north.

Peoples like the Inuit and Saami eat a diet that is high in vitamin D. Inuits, for example, eat a diet high in vitamin D and n-3 fatty acids (Schaebel et al, 2015).  Due to the high vitamin D intake from their diet, they were able to supplement what they did not get from the sun in their diet and thusly were able to live in the unforgiving cold north due to their diet high in vitamin D (Deng and Xu, 2018). Their dark skin color can be explained in a few ways: their diet (high in vitamin-D-rich marine mammals), UVB rays bouncing off ice, snow, and water, and they are recent migrants to those climes, which would explain their darker skin color compared to other populations that have evolved for a longer time in these climates (Jablonski and Chaplin, 2002).

When people look at Arctic people such as the Inuit, they look at their skin color and see the amount of UVB rays they receive during the year and presume that the VDH is wrong because, according to the VDH, Arctic peoples should have the lightest skin but have dark skin—compared to others who evolved recently in those latitudes—but they have dark-ish skin for that latitude. The answer is simple: they were able to consume enough vitamin D in their diet—a lack of vitamin D production/consumption was one barrier to living in the far north which was then overcome with culture and the foods peoples eat.

The environment of the Arctic is dim and dark for most of the year, though during the summer, of course—when they are most active—they are bathed in solar radiation which is then reflected by the snow, ice, and water.  Fresh white snow reflects 94 percent UVA rays and 88 percent of UVB rays. Chadysiene and Girgzdys (2008; 87) write:

The average data of experimental measurements show that maximum albedo of UVA radiation (of about 94%) was at 1 p.m. in comparison with albedo of UVB radiation of about 88% at 2 p.m. The measurements of albedo were performed on fresh snow with big crystals.”

For example, Inuit populations in northern Greenland report spending up to 16 hours outdoors in the spring and summer months, and would be exposed to UV rays bouncing from ice, snow, and water (Andersen, Jakobsen, and Laurberg, 2012). Exposure to UV rays for this extended period of time—along with eating a diet high in vitamin D—is enough to explain their skin color.

Clearly, Arctic people get bathed in UVB and UVA rays from being reflected off the snow and ice, which gives them their darker skin color. They have the ability to tan (which is distinct from the American term “tanning”) and their tanning ability protects them from high doses of UVR that are reflected from the snow whereas their diet high in vitamin D gives them their darkish skin color and allows them to remain healthy in such a harsh, unforgiving environment.

Nina Jablonski has been writing about the VDH for about 30 years. Jablonski writes in her book Living Color: The Biological and Social Meaning of Skin Color (2012: 68):

Traditional cultures of the Inuit and the Saami center on harvesting vitamin-D-rich foods. The dietary focus for both groups has compensated for the vitamin D they cannot produce in their skin. Both peoples remain healthy when they stick to their traditional diets but suffer badly from vitamin D deficiencies when they switch to Western diets that are lower in vitamin D.

Here’s the thing: when these populations move away from their natural, vitamin-D-rich diet, they suffer from many deficiencies regarding vitamin D, even today many Inuit populations suffer from vitamin D deficiency, both children, and adults (Hayek, 2011). So the change in the Inuit diet is the cause of these deficiencies—their traditional diet was high in vitamin D, but their new diet (the Western diet) is low in vitamin D; since they have dark skin and the UVB is so variable throughout the year, they then suffer from vitamin D deficiencies (Sharma et al, 2011). Sharma et al (2011: 475) conclude that Arctic people are at-risk for vitamin D deficiency due to lack of UVB exposure, moving away from a traditional diet high in vitamin D to a Western diet low in vitamin D, combined with their dark skin.

Frost (2012) claims that while the explosion of rickets in Arctic populations is due to a change in diet (shifting away from a high meat diet) and “increased consumption of certain reactive substances: phytic acids in commercially processed cereals; sodium bicarbonate in baking soda; and aluminum hydroxide in antacids” (Frost, 2012). The dominant source of vitamin D for the Inuit is their diet (Schaebel et al, 2015), and so, due to their shift away from their natural diet high in fatty fish and vitamin D, once they began eating a diet not ancestral to them, then the maladies began. We can see this with every country/population that begins to eat a new diet full of processed foods.

Since the frequency of rickets has exploded in populations that eat a Western-like diet and not their traditional diet, this implies that the traditional diet provided enough vitamin D, and when they began eating a new diet with less vitamin D, then these problems such as rickets occurred.

To end these implications, the Inuit need to return to consuming a traditional diet, since their traditional diets have the adequate vitamins and minerals needed to survive in the environment they are currently in (Koladhooz et al, 2013). Higher BMI (body mass index), their skin color, and the latitude of where they live contribute to low vitamin D production. Inuits who consumed a low number of traditional food items were more likely to be deficient in vitamin D (Anderson et al, 2013) while this deficiency is seen even in Inuit school children (Hayek, Egeland, and Weiler, 2010; Singleton et al, 2015).

In sum, there is no anomaly regarding the skin color of Arctic peoples; the hypothesis is called “the vitamin D hypothesis”, and so they get ample vitamin D from the reflection of UV rays from the snow, ice, and water. Reasons for the darkness of their skin include the fact that they are recent migrants to those locations, they consume a diet high in vitamin D, and the reflection of UV rays from albedo surfaces.

The hypothesis that UVB exposure explains the observed skin gradients predicted a novel fact—that populations that migrated out of Africa would be seen to have light skin. This occurred multiple times through three different molecular pathways, in the Neanderthals (Lalueza-Fox et al, 2007) and Europeans and East Asians (different molecular mechanisms for them; Norton et al, 2007). This was a risky, successful and novel prediction made by Jablonski and Chaplin (2000). That this does not hold for Arctic people is not a blow to the hypothesis; it is perfectly explained by the bouncing of UVR off of albedo surfaces and a high vitamin D diet. Skin color is an adaptation to UV rays.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Open thread May 13 to May 19, 2018

14 Monday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 520 Comments

Please place all off-topic comments for the week here.  They will not be posted in the main thread.

This week I will blog about the GRE and maybe sex differences in IQ (per commenter Marry) but today, like every Sunday, is open thread day.

terese

In honor of Mother’s Day, I want to mention a BEAUTIFUL interview I heard on CBC radio with indigenous writer Terese Marie Mailhot.  You can listen to the whole thing here.  The interview opens with Mailhot reading a gut-wrenching scene (from her memoir?) where she’s having breakfast with her white boyfriend.

Mailhot wants to eat both a proper breakfast with eggs and toast and another breakfast with French toast and syrup, but the white boyfriend is having none of it.  So she orders only the proper breakfast with toast.

But the toast doesn’t come.

She complains to the waitress and the toast comes cold.

She complains again and now her breakfast is cold.

Her white boyfriend looks at her with disgust.

Mailhot also talks about her childhood.  She understands why so many indigenous girls keep going missing because growing up in an indigenous community, there were always random men offering her drives to school.  They looked perfectly normal, until you looked in their eyes….

Switching gears, I watched a talk by Yuval Noah Harari.

He makes the point that what makes humans superior is not our intelligence per se, but our ability to cooperate.  He notes than one on one, we’re no better than a chimp.  Indeed if he was placed on a deserted island with a chimp, he suspects the chimp would win.  But if you placed a hundred men against hundred chimp, then men would win because we can cooperate and they can’t.

For those of us who romanticize the idea of the superior individual, this was a hard pill to swallow.

But I think humans are superior to chimps even on the individual level, if given enough time.  The chimp might dominate the man for the first few decades, but if both individuals could live for centuries, the man would eventually figure out how to build a cage and put the chimp in it.  Perhaps collectivism and culture achieve what one individual life doesn’t have time to do.

The 21st century technology we enjoy today is the cumulative collective result of the 107 billion humans to have ever walked the Earth.

Could a single stone age man living all alone on Earth have eventually achieved 21st century technology all by himself, if he lived 107 billion times as long as the average man?  By contrast, a lone chimp living the same amount of time, would never get beyond the stone age.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

The most pro-Jewish President of all time?

10 Thursday May 2018

Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized

≈ 242 Comments

 

trumpandbibi

The Jewish community should give Trump an award for being the most pro-Jewish president of all time.  He took military action against Israel’s enemy Syria, and further infuriated the Muslim world by moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and ripping up the Iran nuclear deal.

And if all that wasn’t pro-Jewish enough, Trump apparently raised his children to marry Jews and so all eight of the grandkids who will inherit Trump’s multibillion dollar empire are either half or a quarter Jewish.

Of course Trump is not the first rich person to give his money to a different ethnic group. Bill Gates has spent billions helping Africans and Angelina Jolie and Madonna have adopted Africans.  Such liberal behavior is a sign of high IQ, perhaps because it’s morally intelligent when rich races help poor races and reduce inequality, even though it’s dumb from purely tribal perspective.

But it’s very rare for someone to give all their money to an ethnic group that’s richer than their own and thus increase inequality at their own group’s expense.  This seems unintelligent both from a moral and ethnocentric perspective, and thus is likely a sign of low IQ.  Not since Michael Jackson left his fortune to his three Caucasian looking kids have we seen such an extreme act of slavish conservatism.

michaeljacksonkids

Michael Jackson claimed to be genetically related to his kids, but skeptics say “no way”

Trump is to the Jewish community as Michael Jackson was to whites.  How long before Trump gets plastic surgery to look more Jewish? 🙂

michaeljackson

Michael Jackson before and after his transformation

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

contact pumpkinperson at easiestquestion@hotmail.ca

Recent Comments

illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
biscuit on Pumpkin Person was right!
ian smith on Pumpkin Person was right!
illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
this includes at lea… on Pumpkin Person was right!
Santocool on Pumpkin Person was right!
check this out! this… on Pumpkin Person was right!
Lurker on Pumpkin Person was right!
south asians and jew… on Pumpkin Person was right!
A LOW IQ PERSON PRET… on Pumpkin Person was right!
AND e-sports aren't… on Pumpkin Person was right!

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • December 2014

Categories

  • ethnicity
  • heritability
  • Oprah
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Comments

illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
Erichthonius on Pumpkin Person was right!
illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
biscuit on Pumpkin Person was right!
ian smith on Pumpkin Person was right!
illuminaticatblog on Pumpkin Person was right!
this includes at lea… on Pumpkin Person was right!
Santocool on Pumpkin Person was right!
check this out! this… on Pumpkin Person was right!
Lurker on Pumpkin Person was right!
south asians and jew… on Pumpkin Person was right!
A LOW IQ PERSON PRET… on Pumpkin Person was right!
AND e-sports aren't… on Pumpkin Person was right!

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • December 2014

Categories

  • ethnicity
  • heritability
  • Oprah
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Pumpkin Person
    • Join 655 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Pumpkin Person
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: