Back in May 2022, I wrote:
I have always doubted the historical consensus that Africans sold their own people into slavery. The whole point of slavery is that you’re forced to work without pay. If whites were powerful enough to force millions of blacks to work without pay, they would have been powerful enough to take those workers from black countries without having to pay for them in the first place.
Also, if they were going to pay for slaves, then why go all the way to Africa to get them? The whole point of going to a less technologically advanced region to get slaves is that you can take the slaves by force.
Lastly, if you believe in HBD (which many people dismiss as racist pseudoscience), the average white American is about 15 IQ points higher than the average black American and that gap would have perhaps been 20 points before white genes entered the U.S. black gene pool in large numbers. A 20 point IQ gap (if it reflects a genuine gap in intelligence) is so large that whites would have been dominant enough to simply help themselves to whatever resources they wanted in sub-Saharan Africa (including human ones) without having to pay anyone anything. In fact if whites really had to pay for slaves, it calls HBD into question because it implies a business deal among equal races, not an advanced race enslaving a more primitive one.
Since writing that, I came across a historical figure named John Hawkins, a white man who did indeed catch his own black slaves.
According to wikipedia:
In 1562, he set sail with three ships (Saloman, Jonas, and Swallow) travelling down the African coast as far as Sierra Leone, he captured people and enslaved them as he went, taking around 300 people in total.[5] From there he sailed to the Caribbean, he did not have permission from either Spain or Portugal to trade with their colonies so he sold his enslaved people in Isabella, Puerto de Plata and Monte Christi – places where the local authorities did not enforce government trade embargos.[5] The enslaved people were traded for pearls, hides and sugar.[7][8]
The trade was so prosperous that, on his return to England, the College of Arms granted Hawkins a coat of arms which displays an enslaved male.
Basically, whether you believe in racial equality or genetic differences, racially distributed reparations would not help.
youre so ideological its dangerous
^^^^
HAHAHA what a hypocrite.
LOADED that’s your r-selected ancestry at work. Just follow the path of least resistance constantly and not worry about the future implications.
haha you idiots dont know K selection if it bit you in the ass. im the most K selected individual on this fucking stupid blog to begin with and your ancestors are fucking sister and motherfuckers to a literal standard!
all of you are so insecure its incredible!
Has the distribution of human intelligence remained constant throughout human history? If not what would cause stark differences in human genetic quality and developmental environment throughout history to create prophetic superhuman like geniuses(and then regular modern geniuses who have to work in teams follow rules hindered mostly etc….)? were the golden ages of empires in the past caused by generational influx/birth of geniuses?
That’s an interesting thought. It could also be that the right (intelligent and wise) people were in the right positions of power at the right time with a suitable government in place (or put it in place) with the suitable environment and national makeup.
I don’t see how one historical account means that you’re right. It’s well-established that they bought slaves first and then the need for more slaves drove them inland to capture more people.
^^^SOCIOPATH^^^
autistic people are the most evil and dangerous people to society stop condoning the myth that theyre harmless.
Well, that’s a hell of a take.
not really. autists are the majority of mass shooters and i would say from a psychological perspective that autists are would be more violent prone if they were given opportunities to behave in concurrence with a stronger sense of freedom honestly
Youre so bad at psychology Loaded. Autists are the most benign and peaceful people on planet earth. You need to actually start reading Puppys articles rather than just shit all over the comment section.
your humor sucks try again
He’s actually right, Philo. A lot of Mass shooters had autism. Again, highlighting how little you actually understand autism.
That said, autism is not necessarily why the mass shooters were mass shooters, so it doesn’t really warrant Loaded’s claim that Autistic people are evil.
Idiot. They were misdiagnosed with autism. For the same reasons Anime was never diagnosed with autism.
once again pill cannot tell the difference between “clinical” and “theory of mind” autism.
He thinks all autistic persons are docile and never angry at the world. (“blobs” and weirdly he thinks all Asians are like this)
In pills, stereotypical mind autists are not real people.
They are blobs.
Autistic moe blobs are the most dangerous race in the world.

“They were misdiagnosed with autism.”
LMAO, not they weren’t. You are so dumb. Just admit you’re wrong.
Youve never met an autistic person your whole life Melo. One of my best friends growing up had aspergers and his brother had full on autism and I can tell you that they wouldn’t harm a fly unless seriously provoked.
pill does not understand that bullies make some autists homicidal. why do autists commit mass murder? answer they were bullied and had friends that influenced them to do it.
where did they get the guns pill? they were influenced.
even if pill is a machiavellian he is too dumb to understand what clinical autism is. my brother chased me with an ax several times because I bullied him when younger. autists remember they never forget nor forgive. pill does not realize how revenge works in autists.
“Youve never met an autistic person your whole life Melo. ”
My sister is autistic, one of my best friends is autistic, and even I have been diagnosed with autism.
You don’t know what autism is. I have no doubt that there are autistic people that are usually non-violent, but not all of them are gullible robots that wouldn’t harm a fly.
I was extremely gullible in elementary school, but in the environment in which I grew up, a lack of social IQ could get you killed. So I learned quickly, and now I’m the life of every party, I have a lot of friends, and it’s never been difficult for me to get laid.
Do you know what masking is?
My autistic best friend hyper-focused on understanding social interactions (he’s an actor.) So, you actually wouldn’t know that he’s autistic unless you got close to him and he let his guard down.
You do realize that someone can have schizophrenia and autism at the same time, right? You have an infantile understanding of how mental disorders work.
pp,
You said that native Americans had an IQ of 95 so were unable to be enslaved.
Is it then not true that anyone can enslave anyone less intelligent than they are as a group?
War in Europe thousands of years ago to today was based on group conflict so.
Look at China enslaving the Uyghurs today.
Races enslaving their own race was / is common practice.
But when science happened it was industrialized.
Now the high-IQ people are on top of the neo-liberal “system”.
They decide what to do with the rest of us.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_suicides
Youre so autistic its actually cringeworthy and painful reading your comments. Just because someone is higher IQ than some other person definitely doesnt mean they can enslave them…
I really don’t know how to reach out to you with words. Youre so lost in autism its actually impossible for me to communicate.
Cat provides better insight than Philo because he is more socially intelligent than Philo.
Sad.
pill only reads half of what I say and then connects the dots wrong.
He already thinks I’m retarded so no matter what i say his interpretation is: retard shit.
look at how he uses the word “definitely”.
Pill: Anime said all high-IQ persons enslave anyone less intelligent. He said everyone with a low IQ was enslaved by high IQ persons.
AK actually said: It is hard to be enslaved if you have a high IQ unless it was thousands of years ago when macro races enslaved their own race. (Macro race meaning all individuals have almost the same IQ) Why is that pp?
Slaves in Rome were of the same IQ as non-slaves.
But the “leaders” definitely had the highest IQs.
pill interprets things wrong. (schizo)
melo is correct.
Yes pill seems to have a major verbal comprehension problem. He accused me of saying whites had slaves so the could brag about white supremacism. Huh? That’s not even close to my thesis. The schizophrenic mind has trouble interpreting abstract ideas.
I keep trying to tell people that Philo doesn’t actually have a high social IQ. He’s just paranoid. And, as Pumpkin would agree, it’s better to see intentions, even when none exist, than to never see any intentions at all.
As a result, he will be right more often than wrong, but he’s not intelligent enough to make astute social observations beyond the surface-level stuff.
It reminds me of my stepdad after his brain tumor. He became hyper-paranoid, and while some of his delusions would have consistent logic, he was still wrong about his judgments. It only worked if you assumed everyone was out to get you.
…but then the evil white racists…
THEY BASICALLY DON’T EXIST!
GROW UP!
SCOTTADAMS@SCOTTADMAS.COM
Exactly. All the polls indicate this.
i hope you sleep well Turkroach you deserve it after finding such absolutely cosmic altering revelations in this unwavering world of absolute contemplative pursuit.
Pill understands 😉
deliver us from our torment and bring us salvation PP you need to find a balance between the bright light of good and bad right and wrong.
He captured the slave from the coast. That probably means he took them from others as store goods. That would be consistant with his pirate activities (steeling Portuguese and Spanish vessels). That also explain what he wouldn’t pay for it. It’s not a proof of white hunting in the jungle for the merchandise.
No I suspect he kidnapped everyday Africans who were living in villages on the coast. Maybe he lay huge nets on the ground and when they stepped into them, he would drag them all kicking and screaming onto his boat.
LOL HAHAHAHA. Puppy nobody thinks blacks are dumber than me but if you think blacks are dumb enough to walk into giant nets lying on the ground….x0
My guess is that it would be too difficult for large population to live by the sea. It was already difficult in Europe, imagine the insalubrity in coastal equatorial Africa.
So slave catchers should have to go mainland unless slaves were brought to the coast by others. As Apple and Nike don’t mind paying sweatshop workers and local authorities, it would make sense not to fight, if you don’t want to colonize. You could use rivalries among Kingdoms. Or take the rivers to guarantee passage to the mainland.
A demography map about were Africans used to live by that time would be helpful to check.
I would think it would be easier to live by the sea because of access to sea food and gets you away from the dangerous jungle.
Thats wrong puppy. Historically human settlements happened near freshwater rivers, not on the coast. You also have to take into account the Africans never really learned how to fish.
I wouldn’t live by the sea anywhere, and even less so in Africa, in the 15th-19th century.
Most food comes from animal breeding and crops farming even in Africa. There may be small communities of fisherman but it’s rare. I think about fishing villages but not fishing cities or populations. There is also a potable water problem by the sea.
Would be interesting to know where the people from sentinel island live even if they are Hunter gatherer and not farmers like Bantu.
This site says that most slaves were taken from inland. Out of 12 M, my guess is that less than 5% could have been picked up by the coast without having brought there.
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/africa-human-geography/
—> So I don’t have any knowledge about this subject but logic tells me Blacks couldn’t have been picked up by the beaches in other than anecdotical numbers because they wouldn’t be able to live there
Maybe someone interested find out.
I have some better references than this but this states that 1.2 million slaves were sold through Calabar. If anyone is interested, I’m pretty sure Drescher has some stuff on this.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-the-slave-traders-were-african-11568991595
I’ll say again that it’s very well established that Africans sold other Africans to Europeans and that one obscure account doesn’t mean that PP was “right” about Europeans and the slave trade.
https://www.ironbarkresources.com/slaves/whiteslaves04.htm
That is to say, I don’t deny that Europeans went inland to capture people, that’s an established fact just like Africans selling other captured African enemy tribes. PP’s “HBD” interpretation is of course straight nonsense.
Puppy is…thinks differently. It doesnt occur to puppy that people pay for things for convenience and not just because they can beat them up and take whatever they have.
Pill you don’t get it. Nothing screams genetically superior like one race actually enslaving another. If all whites did was buy slaves from blacks then that ruins the whole white supremacist narrative. Hell even rich rich black can buy white slaves or even East Asians or Jewish ones. It doesn’t pack the same punch as actually conquering a race and enslaving them by force.
What in the holy hell are you talking about? White people never bragged about enslaving blacks. It was basically down to business. If the slaves were being offered at a low enough price they bought them and if they weren’t then they rounded them up. There is simply too much evidence that blacks enslaved their own people and sold them to traders. Why are you obsessed with this bragging rights stuff? Its so bizarre and ahistorical.
“If all whites did was buy slaves from blacks then that ruins the whole white supremacist narrative. ”
Not really, being able to catch them but instead paying for them only bolsters a claim of genetic superiority. It would show whites had a strong moral sense even in slave trading.
Something I’ve noticed about Nigerians but for whatever reason they dominate fraud. Especially things like phishing and mail order fraud. Its not sophisticated (i.e. because low IQ unlike jews) but maybe further evidence of alleged black psychopathy? RR should read an American Renaissance article I read a few years ago arguing blacks tick all the boxes of psychopathic behaviours e.g. absent fathering, violence, extroversion, etc
This debate the guys were having about whether being too high IQ means you can’t write a mass market book. Uh, definitely if you have autism you are going to struggle. But a competent writer with a high IQ should be able to choose the correct words and phraseology to convey complex points either through analogies or metaphors and so on, particularly in fiction writing. I don’t see how having a massive IQ is going to be a hindrance unless one is writing about a very technical topic like Chris Langan writing about his theory of the universe.
In any case I believe it is the writers responsibility to write an accessible tome, particularly in non-fiction, no matter what the audience with the sole exception of artistic license. Obviously you want to reach as many people as possible for capitalistic reasons.
I agree. The IQ 180 guy I used to correspond with was the clearest most lucid and concise writer I have ever seen. And in terms of talk show hosts, Jerry Springer probably has both the highest IQ and the dumbest audience of any talk show host and that contrast made the show better.
I agree, too. I also think that most hardcore geniuses simply aren’t interested in appealing to the masses, which is why so few of them are visible to the public eye. Bill Gates is a good example of the kind of success one of them can have when he tries to.
Francis Galton probably had a 170+ IQ, and he had no issue writing works accessible to his dumber colleagues and became one of the most influential scientists of all time.
I wonder what PP thinks his IQ is.
Sailer thinks Galton was smarter than Darwin, his cousin.
”
austin slater
said:
March 11, 2023 at 8:04 pm
I agree, too. I also think that most hardcore geniuses simply aren’t interested in appealing to the masses, which is why so few of them are visible to the public eye. Bill Gates is a good example of the kind of success one of them can have when he tries to.
Francis Galton probably had a 170+ IQ, and he had no issue writing works accessible to his dumber colleagues and became one of the most influential scientists of all time.
I wonder what PP thinks his IQ is.”
I agree with your estimate of Galton’s intelligence. He was a universal genius who achieved prominence during a more meritocratic period of civilization. Bill Gates is his vastly more successful and immoral cognitive inferior. Galton wasn’t a literary writer or a television talk show host.
The dichotomy between an intellectual ochlocracy such as the literary and talk show consumer market and the scientific community which eventoday retains many characteristics of an intellectual oligarchy appears to be a source of immense perplexity here.
Some of the greatest minds were mass market icons. Shakespeare became one of the richest people of his generation providing melodrama for the masses, not high art for the elites.
Although Francis Galton wrote a novel called Kantsaywhere, literature was not his primary vocation and there is no evidence of the novel’s commercial success. I misread your comment as 160+.
I am not certain that he was above 170. I consider him superior to Charles Darwin and approximately equal to Karl Pearson.
I am almost 100% certain that Galton was above 170. I just found it strange that I had misread the comment and had to do a quick review of his thoughts and contributions in my mind.
pumpkinperson
said:
March 12, 2023 at 2:02 am
“Some of the greatest minds were mass market icons. Shakespeare became one of the richest people of his generation providing melodrama for the masses, not high art for the elites.”
I am not a bardolator. The leader of the bardolatry cult in the United States was an unctuous, vapid sycophantic Jew called Harold Bloom. He was incapable of understanding the true meaning of Cormac McCarthy’s best book Blood Meridian. The main argument of the average bardolator for Shakespeare’s status as the greatest writer of all time is Shakespeare’s use of a plethora of different words. It is rooted in a misunderstanding of the nature of verbal intelligence. The semantic content of language is what matters, not Shakespeares whimsical wordplay. If you apply this criterion according to which Shakespeare is superior to Dante, you arrive at the conclusion that the rappers Aesop Rock and immortal technique are superior writers to both Shakespeare and Dante.
The dichotomy between an intellectual ochlocracy such as the literary and talk show consumer market and the scientific community which eventoday retains many characteristics of an intellectual oligarchy appears to be a source of immense perplexity here.
I didn’t mean to conflate the two. I just see him as example of someone vastly more intelligent than his already smart target audience.
Imagination means you are creating things in your mind all the time. It is simply a matter of if you are creating stories all the time or not. Or seeing them in your head all the time.
It is an orientation, an introverted one. Not the same as an inner monolog. But an internal feedback loop regarding stories.
J. K. Rowling saw in her head what harry looked like and where he lived and what he did. She saw his friends at the school and the magic they cast. I never read harry potter but I was told Hermione Granger was autistic. I knew a girl at work just like her. (IQ 132)
I read Issac asimove instead. Scifi, not fantasy. All 7 foundation novels and more. I did not read Tolkien but he was in the same literature fan club of C.S. Lewis and I read the entire series when I was 14, chronicles of Narnia.
I also read 1984 in 2007.
IQ is not all made equal. Without internal feedback, it is all manipulation no creativity. That is the problem with pill and rr. Pill interprets things wrong (lacks perceptual awareness of creativity – colors it with his own weird thoughts) rr just memorizes things (muh augumunt – muh inner dictionary of right word definitions). Both cannot see things for what they truly are.
And all three of us, pill, rr, AK, don’t tell stories in our heads the way real writers do. None of us are creative in that way. Don’t call the kettle black, pill. (he will just wait). But at least I understand. I have normal comprehension. Relationships are no mystery to me.
So it’s like: AK does not know who George Soros is therefore he is autistic. All adults know who Soros is. I am a smart pill.
No pill. That is just your job. Again anyone not like pill, reads what pill reads, does what pill does, has the same opinion as pill is autistic (but only to pill because of “ego”).
pill cannot and refuses to understand: that differences do not equate to autism. He is not a social genius. He thinks because of his finance/media/limited conspiracy knowledge IQ and because he is over 45 that everyone besides a few is autistic IN COMPARISON. – The only adults that can and do exist are adults like him. (INTJ on average think everyone else is dumb but them which is just arrogance they are prone to not actual reality)
emotionally pill’s ego protection makes it possible for him given his IQ to seek things out without giving a shit about others to get what he wants. (the psychopathic nature of the finance system – a system pill understands and thus sees himself as superior + “pill is British”) He quit his job because it was boring he hates middle management. He has no purpose so sits at home playing videogames.
AK has no purpose and is emotionally immature but that is not the same as IQ. pill cannot separate the two. You both need psychopathic and IQ to be mature to pill understanding. pill is a machiavellian. Which is not creative like Tolkien, C.S. Lewis or Assimov or J.K. Rolling. – The used car salesman is better than AK pill thinks because he can trick people and pill is an expert at seeing people trick other people. (Soros).
I have to say nobody makes me laugh as much as Andrew Anglin. His website is banned but he posts on Unz so check him out.
“I have always doubted the historical consensus that Africans sold their own people into slavery”
Already wrong because african peoples never seeing themselves as the same people. Actually no macro racial groups.
what the fuck are you even writing. you know no one actually understands what youre saying Anime is incredibly more coherent than you idiot and that buttfucker Pill only agrees with you because he is a homosexual himself!
Santo is at least 30 IQ points more intelligent than you Loaded. You can’t understand him because youre basically not on the level.
Loaded ”Sarcasm” is at a mentally retarded level.
https://i.imgflip.com/5eazx4.jpg?a466200
He’s polluting your comment sections, PiPi, Moderator.
Well, as long as I’m not a brown dwarf with severe mental disorder, I could have two asses that would be much better.
no woman would want you Santo youre an ugly Brazilian.
Loaded is not dumb he is just a gen z histrionic.
I had no better things to say at his age but at least I kept quiet about it.
“he is just a gen z histrionic.”
That’s a good way to put it.
Loaded, brazilians are considered as one of the best looking people in the world.
Look at such low level of this cockroach from Mumbai. I could reply but i think it’s a complete waste of time. It’s so lower and yes everyone knows this retarded is here to troll us.
I could pass a “high caste indian”, maybe a mixed euro-indian because my phenotype is very southern european. Still a complete irrelevant stuff.
But PP loves low class people. That’s why she loves Oprah…
The biggest reason this blog is a failled project is Pipi.
“He is not dumb”
The dumbest of this blog so far.
Not just dumb but very crazy.
But again pipi loves people like that to make money with this shit.
“I don’t make money with this blog”
How to believe in someone who make mistery about her own identity??
This blog is an addiction for me. Not good one.
That’s why i think we should leave pp alone in her madness.
Something i will do very soon. Again, nothing new or better here. Just PP.
But Mugabe and Phil want to keep commenting here. You have Unz platform to make your “virtual fames”. You don’t need this stupid blog. (PP will cancel me to tell these hard truths).
And if you think i was offended by this dwarf, so sorry. It’s always a perception to wasting time and patience in this blog. It’s like playing crazy commenting here. Sorry for the reasonable ones. But my main source for wasting my patience is Pipi. Without her machiavelian mind, this blog could improve in quality but don’t expect nothing reasonable from a Oprah fan…
LOL! I always said Loaded reminds me of Fredrico from Six Feet Under & it seems that character was just as homophobic as he is:
How old are you Santo?
pill does not take age into account when estimating IQ.
nor bilingualism or language(left brain) vs spatial(right brain).
Loaded is only 27 yo.
I’m almost a decade older.
I don’t care about IQ rankings.
Excellent point, Santo. that’s why White nationalism is incoherent as a concept. White isn’t a nationality. Arguably, it’s not even a culture.
Always a matter of ethnicity.
White is a very American term. Even macro races are real, only white nationalists seeing them as more relevant than ethnicity. Actually most white nationalists are nordicists. They often exclude white mediterraneans. A nordicist club.
I understand this concept, just like when greeks unite against persians. More a political or pragmatic concept than an essential or real one. But within a macro race there are so many cultural and ethnic diversity that doesn’t make sense a macro racial brotherhood.
@Santo
This is true insofar as identity is concerned. What is interesting is coupling this notion with the Dunbar’s number. Dunbar’s number is classically thought to be a fixed singular number, but in reality it might be different for different people. Still there are only so many people that a person can relate to in real life. And yet, even small ethnic identities far exceed that amount. However, on their own, none of the ethnic identities quite reach level of pan-macroracial identity (even if the macro race forms a genetic cluster). A strange phenomenon.
Am I tripping? Did you delete Santo’s comment?
No
Pumpkin post my comments you loser.
I swear to god I saw that comment in the mobile version before it was “official” on the desktop version.
It’s important to bear in mind that in the first century of exploitation european waves were not numerous. But i don’t think didn’t had any genuine racist element on african slavedom. Even muslims had made some racistlike observations about black africans during their first contacts.
We need to do a poll about banning RR.
https://godskingdom.org/blog/2023/03/prince-harry-and-oprah-lose-millions-in-svb-collapse
590 million of Oprah’s 3 billion? Wow!
Pretty sure that’s a fake click-bait story.
Peeps,
Assuming the blacks he picked up from Africa were coastal, they were some of the smartest blacks as coastal people are usually smarter than interior people. So they are not exactly equivalent to the dumbest blacks( example: unmixed american blacks) but were more likely equivalent to the smartest blacks ( Caribbean blacks).
And the whites colonizers of those times had guns and big nets They easily could have sailed close to the coast…found one or two black individuals probably walking along the beach, threw nets on them, threatened them with guns and took them back to their ships. IQ difference between both doesn’t hold much of an importance here.
Brown people( people of north africa) also enslaved whites during the moorish era, and before or after that…ruled a white country Spain for 800 years. Does it mean north africans have an higher iq than whites?
technology and economics
I doubt whites could take on jungle or coastal blacks one on one in a fistfight / club / spear fight and capture as many as they did.
guns, nets, ships – the disadvantages black Africans had were huge.
what I hear and what I see in movies is that native Americans would torture their captives. so whites could not enslave them because they feared torture so much. (Mel Gibson Apocalypto)
Also, look at brave heart where the Scotts could not be conquered by the Romans or British.
Mongols??
You’re not wrong. It isn’t as simple as “I enslaved you, therefore me smarter.”
I mean, even today, a group of black guys could surround your car with guns and force you to get out, and you could end up being sold as a sex slave. Are they smarter than you by virtue of doing this? Probably not.
You don’t need to be smarter to enslave those who are physically weaker or less numerous than you but that wasn’t the case with whites and blacks. Humans are the only species to enslave other animals and we’re also the smartest species.
“Humans are the only species to enslave other animals and we’re also the smartest species”
REALLY??????
So parasitism doesn’t exist in other species interactions????
A parasite benefits from your hard work without doing work themselves. A slave master FORCES you to do work AGAINST YOUR WILL. A slave master is a very specific, uniquely human form of parasite.
Ants, the animal with the greatest brain:body mass ratio, engage in dulosis, the form of parasitism most similar to human slavery.
If true that’s fascinating
And beware bringing slaves into your society … They will be responsible of 80% of the murders.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-rebellion-of-the-ant-slaves
…
Replace gravity to teach about god.
The more I think about intelligence the more I view it as just abstract hierarchical prediction calculations.
Break things into parts and then put them together.
segmentation modularization mental manipulation.
creativity/generation is the brain coming up with new novel combinations.
I look at things and they seem clearer. Perception of shape color and motion and anticipation of what comes next. (Focus)
This with this: yes / no | (Aware)
I don’t think taking advantage of a non-coherent population in order to get them to sell each other is inferior to throwing fishnets at them, thus creating more hostility where there might’ve not been.
If you can walk into a village and have them do what you want without being violent yourself, isn’t that better? Whether the villagers consider you an equal or even an inferior is irrelevant.
If whites were smart enough to capture millions of slaves, they’d also be smart enough to get others to do it for them. However it shows more intelligence if they could capture them themselves despite local resistance as opposed to capturing them with local help even if the latter is a more intelligent strategy. Kind of like it takes more intelligence to build a computer than to buy one eve if buying one cheap is the more intelligent thing to do given limited time and energy. It changes the narrative from whites enslaving backs to whites and blacks working together to enslave blacks.
Why do you keep talking about bragging rights? Who cares if it takes more effort to beat up blacks and take them into the ships? Are you insane?
Because a major reason I became hbd was learning that whites enslaved blacks. It was the most shocking thing I ever heard like something that can only happen in a sci fi horror movies
How could one race be so superior as to reduce another to slaves like they were cattle or something
So hear this shocking fact was supposedly exaggerated…..
I didn’t think of it that way. As a pure narrative, you’re right, but these were economic ventures so how much does that matter.
So obviously you fell asleep in history class and never knew slavery existed for all of human history. Arabs enslaved whites. Eygptians enslaved blacks. South americans enslaved each other etc etc. Literally p1 of any history book will mention slavery. What a dumbass.
And generally speaking more intelligent populations enslave less intelligent populations because intelligence is the ability to adapt; to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage.
So Jews dominate whites and Arabs. Whites and Arabs have enslaved Bantu. Bantu enslaved pygmies. Pygmies dominate animals. Animals dominate plants.
Understand my little dumb-dumb?
Eroc, How did you know I was sold as a sex slave? That was supposed to be secret, dammit!
You just give off a sex slave vibe tbh.
I am working on it.
apologize peepee.
https://nosweatshakespeare.com/blog/was-shakespeare-rich/
Thanks for the correction.
But the larger point of him appealing to a mass audience still stands.
It does not stand. The fake blood, fireworks, and bluster of the stage appealed to a mass audience, not the text itself. If he had published his plays in book form rather than performed them on stage, he would have never achieved his moderate financial success.
I was cancelled by PP.
I’m trying to open their eyes…
RR should do an article that proves how Leo Frank was totally innocent of raping and killing a young girl and everyone was antisemitic, by citing various Jewish and neocon sources. That will totally make his claim valid.
there are very smart people talking seriously about a dictatorship in the US. not because they like dictatorships, but because they see a dictatorship as the only means of restoring the constitutional republic. that is it would be a transitional dictatorship as happened in argentina for example.
That basically wouldn’t work. The dictator would probably be a fascist if youre talking about the States. Most of the Moneyed Interest would line up behind him like the rich did behind Hitler in 30s Germany.
The problem is the Moneyed Interest is just much too powerful in the States and its compounded by the Jewish Question. In my lifetime, the States will become a failed state.
We already live in a kind of liquid dictatorship called capitalism. We live in performatic democracy or moneycracies. Capitalism is totalitarian as hell but invest deeply in its propaganda. It’s not an ideology in which the individual is the end but a mean to an end, profit, specially for a special minority. Sheer and structural parasitism.
^^ Think we have a marxist in the building. Thats a compliment 🙂
you’re so embarrassing
The problem with treating humans too much as ends in themselves is you either end up with no rules (liberalism) or too many rules (to “protect” people), and these both end up in very bad societies for obvious reasons. It’s also why we have an economic crisis in the West but we are asked to give money to Zelensky because every Ukrainian LGBTQIA+ needs protection.
If you think people give money to Ukraine “only” because LGBT rights so you are completely ignorant about what’s happening there. Sad.
For every thing there is a risk. But give basic rights to a minority people who has been signficantly discriminated by no rational reasons (god???) for centuries is not an excess of individualism here or in Mars.
But i find interesting when i see someone being against individual rights. So tell me about en masse immigration… being against it is not… social justice??
Every conservative
“Mortality for me. Not for you”
Every neoliberal
“Freedom for me. Not for you”
Even thought my comment is sounding marxist i’m not a Karl Marx worshiper. I don’t think comunism works but i believe capitalism is not good either.
It’s ironic that most conservatives worship capitalism, as it has been the primary enforcer of social liberalism and political correctness over the last 60+ years.
Success selects for conformity to the ruling paradigm, both at the individual and group level. People who don’t assent can’t get or keep their jobs, and companies that don’t get sued, lose market share, etc.
That being said, I’m completely agnostic economically. Changing from one system to another has massive negative consequences that most radicals don’t account for.
You can support a different economic system in the abstract but justifiably reject its adoption due to the negative consequences associated with change.
The ultimate test of maturity, in my opinion, is recognizing that there are good reasons for why things are the way the are–and similarly, good reasons for why things ought not to change.
Opposing and subverting traditions and collective beliefs merely on the grounds that they’re not literally true is misguided for this reason. Hayek understood this.
the negative consequences associated with sudden/revolutionary change.
revolutions generally fail…supposedly. but what does that actually mean?
how many absolute monarchies are there today? when the US declared its independence vs today?
since robespierre?
the bolshevik revolution “failed” it just took it 72 years to “fail”. and the tsar never came back.
reminds me of a line from a talk-like-a-pirate/long-john-silver-accent cornishman: cider drinking killed my father. it took it 85 years to kill ‘im. but it killed ‘im.
”The ultimate test of maturity, in my opinion, is recognizing that there are good reasons for why things are the way the are–and similarly, good reasons for why things ought not to change.”
Social parasitism, especially since civilization.
And it needs to change because it’s totally irrational.
We are organizing society to make a profit for a minority of mostly parasitic human beings.
There is no real meritocracy about it.
”Opposing and subverting traditions and collective beliefs merely on the grounds that they’re not literally true..is misguided for this reason. Hayek understood this.”
Misguided ”traditions” must be changed.
Central fallacy of evolutionary psychology under conservative ideological domination.
Perpetuate the belief of conservatism, in its entirety, as an inevitable/unavoidable reality or reality itself.
Example
All human beings are selfish
So capitalism is natural to us
Reality:
Human beings vary in their levels of selfishness. Generally, the most selfish human beings are those who better adapt to capitalist system/environment.
The thrust of all right-wing ideologies is to uniform natural human diversity.
There are two cultural-political-evolutionary forces acting in human environments:
diversification/relaxation
Uniformization/selection
Denmark is the perfect state of affairs. Just copy and paste every policy from Denmark. It doesn’t take a genius to work that one out.
“they see a dictatorship as the only means of restoring the constitutional republic.”
Which is not something an intelligent person would believe.
stupid people don’t know they’re stupid.
revolutions “fail” in the sense that…when the revolutionaries say:
okay. this is how it’s gonna be from now on.
vs
succeed:
okay. it’s never gonna be like that again and it took a revolution.
what does melo think lincoln was during the civil war?
moron!
“stupid people don’t know they’re stupid.”
Yeah, that’s you. That’s why you fall for propaganda so easily.
And the lincoln comparison doesn’t really work.
The point is, you’re a gullible retard.
So you think whites buying slaves from blacks invalidates HBD? What are you, 10 years old or something?
You don’t get it.
If you were an anthropologist and the saw fossil evidence showed Homo Sapiens had enslaved Neanderthals you’d think “wow we must have been more advanced to have had such an unequal relationship”
But if you learned we had merely bought Neanderthal slaves from Neanderthals, you’d think “Wow, we must have been very equal to have engaged in trade”
So while it doesn’t invalidate HBD, the case for HBD would be stronger if slaves were taken, not bought
Good you are not an anthropologist.
Nuance…
What i said, in the very begining of great european discoveries/invasions, they were in huge demographic disadvantage and probably coastal africans already had in contact with muslims lot of them caucasians. Seeing portuguese wouldnt be so different.
The fact that they exchanged slaves in the first time doesn’t mean african kingdoms were absolutely inferior to european ones.
Vikings were not “genetically superior” to peoples they massacred.
Pre columbian civilized americans were not “genetically inferior” to europeans (spaniards ).
You are analysing this stuff without historical contexts that make it more complex than just “the people who enslaved the other were all ‘genetically superior’ “.
Good comment Santo.
Thanks, RR.
PP is a typical HBD. They tend to think history is not important to understand human evolution.
Obviously if the Jews replace 50% of the American population with latinos and assorted debris from the third world…the US will become a third would nation. Its inevitable. Melo from the Philippenes worshipping rappers…thats basically the future of the USA. A complete sink.
Debris? Latino women are beautiful and a big competition to white women for white men? White women started getting scared so the power that be are fattening Latino women up. That is the charm of Latino women, that they are being fattened up to ensure the survival of white women.
A light brown woman with lips as thin as a white woman and eyes as small too is the most beautiful in the world. Not white, not light brown, not dark brown nor black or yellow. And light brown women with lip and eye sizes like that of white women are plenty in the states and Latin countries. And if they weren’t fattened up…most white women would have been without a mate.
Youre south asian so you prefer brown women.
The reason they get fat is not a conspiracy but low IQ. The problem with these Latinas is they are generally stupider and shorter as well, and their brown skin is only a mask that doesn’t reveal how flawed they are at closer inspection.
Pill im actually really happy you prefer men
God, I fucking love Latinas. I’d never marry one, though. Probably cheat on me. At least the Americanized ones would.
“The reason they get fat is not a conspiracy but low IQ”
Haha said the guy who’s clearly clueless about obesity and its aetiology. But then again, so is JayMan and Satoshi Kanazawa.
Obesity is hella multifactorial—to reduce it to “iQ” completely misses the structural and systemic reasons why people only have access to certain foods, nevermind the education to know what to eat and how to eat and prepare it. There are these things called “food swamps” and “food deserts” and, surprise surprise, they’re more likely to be found in low-income areas. That’s one reason why equity in public health is so important, and why we need to address the barriers that impede people from being their healthiest at a societal level. But what do I know, I’ve only been dealing with these issues for 10 years.
Surprise, surprise, everything you listed is also correlated with IQ.
It’s like when you say that IQ testers know what is “supposed” to scale with IQ and so it is no surprise that IQ scales with income or educational or work success… we’d also expect that if problem-solving ability did differ so would success in a predictable manner. Surprise, surprise.
“But what do I know, I’ve only been dealing with these issues for 10 years.”
Yes you know how to cite cucked-out white or Jewish studies. Sad.
“misses the structural and systemic reasons why people only have access to certain foods,”
Of course I know all about the structural systems of institutional racialism.
“nevermind the education to know what to eat and how to eat and prepare it.”
Yes, the folks who breed goats and chickens in their backyards even when its not allowed don’t know what to eat or prepare it. The people who more likely to be involved in some sort of food and agricultural related industry know less about it than white people. Latin Americans who you literally just referred to as being poorer and are from poorer, more traditional countries and so would have more contact with more traditional foods and practices don’t know anything about how to prepare food.
Being an social constructivist is one hell of a drug.
But nobody is forcing a poor mom to give coke to her daughter or son of 6 years old.
Oftentimes is a combination of factors and yes including “lack of education” or lack of intelligence and reasonableness too.
“Surprise, surprise, everything you listed is also correlated with IQ.”
Surprise surprise—IQ is a mere surrogate for social class.
“It’s like when you say that IQ testers know what is “supposed” to scale with IQ and so it is no surprise that IQ scales with income or educational or work success… we’d also expect that if problem-solving ability did differ so would success in a predictable manner..”
If IQ is a surrogate for social class, then we would expect this…
““But what do I know, I’ve only been dealing with these issues for 10 years.”
Yes you know how to cite cucked-out white or Jewish studies. Sad.”
No, I actually work with people. “Anything that disagrees with me are cucked-out white or Jewish studies”
“Of course I know all about the structural systems of institutional racialism.”
Institutional racism* The fact of the matter is, food deserts and swamps are a huge barrier impeding people being healthy. I’d cite references but they’re just “cucked-out white or Jewish studies.”
Being a racist is a hell of a drug.
“IQ is a mere surrogate for social class.”
Argument for the claim is here.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/03/01/the-myth-of-general-intelligence/
What’s the argument that IQ explains obesity?
“Surprise surprise—IQ is a mere surrogate for social class.”
Or the opposite. And this doesn’t explain why many poor or uncouth individuals have high IQs and vice versa.
“If IQ is a surrogate for social class, then we would expect this…”
OK, robot.
“No, I actually work with people. “Anything that disagrees with me are cucked-out white or Jewish studies””
Anything that claims that privilege and social class are the cause of all life outcomes sounds like a woke cucked out study, yes.
Again, white people or people of any social class have been fat or skinny. You’ll see an array of fat or skinny Latin Americans in the same area. It has little to do with education or food deserts. If it did, why don’t they open a goddamn clean restaurant in addition to the rest of the lardy taco, enchilada, tamale restaurants they bring with them? You can’t tell me someone living in farm country has no food options. Jesus christ.
“Of course I know all about the structural systems of institutional racialism.”
“Institutional racism* The fact of the matter is, ”
Structural systems of institutional racialism*
“food deserts and swamps are a huge barrier impeding people being healthy. I’d cite references but they’re just “cucked-out white or Jewish studies.””
When blacks try to rob and kill whites without warning, “learn to fight and constantly be vigilant and destroy your heart through stress bro”.
When Latin Americans (who chose to come here often illegally) and blacks are obese retards, “Ahhh poor underprivileged babies just don’t know not to eat processed foods and inject lard and sugar into everything!”
All it would take to give evidence to RR’s claim that intelligence differences are simply proxies for social class and have nothing to do with brain matter is one example of a supremely tiny-brained individual from a wealthy family who was obviously extremely high IQ.
Instead, high IQ outliers are people like Oprah and Chris Langan who happen to have giant brains, and one hundred percent of people with very small brains are either average or intellectually disabled.
Sad.
“When Latin Americans (who chose to come here often illegally) and blacks are obese retards”
And many of white americans as well.
But wouldnt call all them “retards”. There are many people who are easily addicted to ultraprocessed food even being on avg or above avg on greenwich-IQ. Also ultraprocessed foods specially in American urban regions tend to be cheaper and accessible in poor areas. Here in Brasil, fruits are abundant and acessible. It’s helps a little. Again, seems a combination of factors, intrinsic and extrinsic to the individuals.
Also there are people who just born already “overweight”.
“And many of white americans as well.
But wouldnt call all them “retards”. There are many people who are easily addicted to ultraprocessed food even being on avg or above avg on greenwich-IQ. Also ultraprocessed foods specially in American urban regions tend to be cheaper and accessible in poor areas. Here in Brasil, fruits are abundant and acessible. It’s helps a little. Again, seems a combination of factors, intrinsic and extrinsic to the individuals.”
Right but I’m only saying there is no conspiracy to fatten Mexicans up. They do it to themselves, and yes, partially because of a lack of education. But it’s not a conspiracy (if there was conspiracy to fatten them up then you’d have to admit white genocide was real as well but RR would never do that).
“Also there are people who just born already “overweight”.”
Well yeah of course there are genetic factors both mental and body-wise.
“Anything that claims that privilege and social class are the cause of all life outcomes sounds like a woke cucked out study, yes.
Again, white people or people of any social class have been fat or skinny. You’ll see an array of fat or skinny Latin Americans in the same area. It has little to do with education or food deserts. If it did, why don’t they open a goddamn clean restaurant in addition to the rest of the lardy taco, enchilada, tamale restaurants they bring with them? You can’t tell me someone living in farm country has no food options. Jesus christ.”
I never made that claim. Example: What explains the IQ-income relationship is family background and education, not IQ (Ceci). So what does this tell you?
“Structural systems of institutional racialism*”
Nope. Systemic racism exists and is most prevalent in public health/healthcare.
“When blacks try to rob and kill whites without warning, “learn to fight and constantly be vigilant and destroy your heart through stress bro”.
When Latin Americans (who chose to come here often illegally) and blacks are obese retards, “Ahhh poor underprivileged babies just don’t know not to eat processed foods and inject lard and sugar into everything!””
It’s a problem of access. I’d give you references but you’d just blow it off.
“All it would take to give evidence to RR’s claim that intelligence differences are simply proxies for social class and have nothing to do with brain matter is one example of a supremely tiny-brained individual from a wealthy family who was obviously extremely high IQ.”
Nope, that’s not it at all. I’ve shown that “IQ” is a social class proxy.
Saying that systemic racism explains these disparities isn’t the same as a “conspiracy.” Eg, education helps blacks manage their blood pressure better, but it’s probably just a “Jewish woke cuck study” so you’ll ignore it anyway.
”I think there is a conspiracy called capitalism: everything for profit.
But we simply cannot take full responsibility for people. Many of them really don’t care what they are eating.”
I understand your point.
RR seems to believe that ordinary people are always innocent victims, but always conniving with their own health outcomes, although a lower IQ is strongly related to a lack of self-control.
”Self Citation”
new modality lol
The claim that IQ is a social class surrogate—that is, an outcome and not a cause—is well-evidenced, but you’ll just ignore it.
https://archive.scienceforthepeople.org/vol-6/v6n2/unmasking-the-iq-lie/
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/11/14/summer-vacation-and-iq-how-summer-vacation-widens-educational-inequality/
I have receipts for my claim, where are yours? Or is it an unevidenced, unargued claim?
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/02/16/herrnsteins-syllogism/
Basically, “IQ” tests tell us what types of things people were exposed to in their lives (the nutrition they had), their education (since “IQ” and achievement gets are different versions of the same test), which relates to family background and social class. And as Ceci showed, what explains the IQ-income relationship is family background and social class, not “IQ.” Thus, “IQ” is a mere class surrogate.
How difficult it is to understand and accept that intelligence, and not just IQ, is also a relevant factor in explaining the obesity epidemic
Individual responsibility//intelligence and systemic influences//profitalism are not mutually excludent.
“How difficult it is to understand and accept that intelligence, and not just IQ, is also a relevant factor in explaining the obesity epidemic”
What’s the argument?
At the end of the day, the outright explosion in obesity since the 50s/60s isn’t explained by “IQ”—relevant societal factors explain it, without the need for “IQ.”
”Basically, “IQ” tests tell us what types of things people were exposed to in their lives (the nutrition they had), their education (since “IQ” and achievement gets are different versions of the same test), which relates to family background and social class.”
Differences between correlation and causality:
There are stupid rich people who don’t do well on IQ tests.
There are comfortable middle-class people who don’t either.
And there are intellectually gifted people coming from the working class.
Intelligence or lack off is basal for human behavior.
Something called agency.
And if IQ broadly reflects human intelligence…
Less intelligent people are more likely to make bad decision due to poor self control from having kids without any economic condition to feeding themselves with junk food.
No societal change can happen without individual intelligence as a relevant factor. No people make decision without accessing their own cognitive scopes.
Ignore the question mark in the second sentence of my comment.
I’ve been here 6 years and Melo has never said anything correct or even interesting.
peter thiel explains the tech industry’s political unifomity by: software engineers are shallow and stupid (relative to thiel). including bill gates. sad. those weren’t his exact words. but that’s what he meant.
Thiel is really smart. His one downfall is that hes a libertarian but over the past few years hes jumped on the trump train.
IIRC Thiel was some sort of college chess champion, got an offer to go to big law and then completely switched field to set up Paypal. His IQ must be huge.
isn’t he a puppet for the neocons?
Think youre confusing him with someone else. Hes not jewish.
That’s why I said puppet
Hes against the lebensraum wars.
https://reason.com/2019/07/17/peter-thiel-explains-the-new-national-conservatism/
I’m sure he is now. The litmus test is opposing the Iraq & Afghanistan War BEFORE it began
I think Thiel is socially intelligent enough to conclude jews run US foreign policy.
I sadly kind of doubt it. Thiel strikes me as someone who looks at the world through a Jordan Peterson lens.
VC/Entrepreneur types can be politically incorrect, but they’re largely ignorant of Jewish influence in my experience.
I agree. He’d probably blame the military industrial complex or Saudi Arabia for the Iraq War before he’d think of the Israel lobby. There’s a reason why that book was written by two of the most elite academics in America. It generally takes a very high IQ (and high social IQ) to see Ashkenazi influence on U.S. foreign policy unless you’re Arab/Muslim or work in Washington.
the point is thiel is smarter than other people in “tech” because that’s not hard. other people in “tech” are what he says they are:
one dimensional…shallow…autists…easily brainwashed by the “liberal consensus”…they know what coding is…they don’t know what thinking is…thiel makes fun of computer science majors as a lot dumber than electrical engineering majors inter alia.
thiel can never be taken seriously because unashamed of his perversions…
“thiel can never be taken seriously because unashamed of his perversions…”
You mean he’s gay lol
you guys know youre all trolls rite?
Puppy what video games do you play (if any)?
I’m playing Destiny 2 at the moment. I’m doing the new expansion – Lightfall. Destiny can be a grindy game at times but its still mainly fun.
My coworkers and I were playing Deep Space, Wild Hearts, and Atomic Heart on weekend.
your coworkers are uneducated
They gave me a statistics textbook to study for my economics bachelors and I basically didn’t read it because I found it too boring. I regret doing that but I find math really really boring.
Math is boring. It’s the problems it can solve that make it interesting.
The problem with my entire math education was they never actually told us what the math was for and there was zero real world examples.
That’s very sad. Math is an incredibly beautiful thing that can radically alter how you see the World.
Yup, I only like stats when it pertains to human skulls, lol
how would you know peepee? misdreavus knew.
misdreavus didn’t know shit. Stop pining over your black boyfriend. If he truly loved you, he’d come back.
”That’s very sad. Math is an incredibly beautiful thing that can radically alter how you see the World.”
Usually for the worse, from what I see
creepy perverts like you guys should never have a woman.
You need to put this guy out of his misery and ban him. It would actually be good for him mentally at this stage.
I agree. He’s useless.
Yeah, if anybody needs to be banned, it’s loaded. I feel bad for the dude, but he needs help, and I don’t think his blog is healthy for him.
You called yourself a marxist. So unban the comment.
Yeah but the way you treat it as a status symbol is cringe.
remember that im a boskop man from south africa fr fr.
Being a marxist is waaaay better than a fucking libertarian.
whatever helps you sleep at night buddies i know da truth
LOADED adds much more to the comments than the following commenters:
rr, melo, peepee
what does melo think FDR was during the great depression?
moron!
what would the dictator do ian?
gas the furries?
are “they” the problem?
I hope not.
I do not think anything would be better if there was a dictator.
what would he do? why are things so bad we need one?
the people usually fight back if they hate the dictator.
half anyway?
of course by “racism” i mean the recognition that
THE ONLY SYSTEMIC RACISM IN THE US IS ANTI-WHITE RACISM.
THE ONLY SYSTEMIC RACISM IN THE US IS ANTI-WHITE RACISM.
THE ONLY SYSTEMIC RACISM IN THE US IS ANTI-WHITE RACISM.
BRAVO.
BRAVO.
BRAVO.
^Facts.
i have asked peepee many many times to ban melo and rr and herself and admit that she is black.
she has refused too many times sadly.
PP cannot be black. Thinking that by you would be admitting by you, that black women can be smart enough to write the articles and comments pp writes. Do you think a black woman can be capable of doing this?
Oprah is more of an exception than the rule regarding black women.
What a really racist comment!!
My intention wasn’t it. I just said what I truly believed.
Black people have more frontal lobar intelligence than others in my opinion. But what peeps writes requires more parietal and temporal lobe intelligence.
Sidenote: Santo..loaded is from pakistan not mumbai which is in india.
Yea straight garbage generalizations. And pseudoscienctific.
“Black people have more frontal lobar intelligence than others”
Theory of mind? Default network?
Based on what?
What i know frontal lobe is related with reflective thinking or meta cognition and planning.
RR,
said ‘in my opinion’. I didnt claim it as scientific fact, if i did you should have said then that it is pseudo scientific.
Santo, blacks have weaker parietal and temporal lobe intelligence so even if they have higher frontal lobe intelligence the things you mentioned need strong temporal and parietal lobes too.
On avg they are not “good” on high cognitive functions too, frontal lobe right?
Or better saying they have a disproportion of ADHD impulsive like type than other macro groups which makes them at collective levels less than others on it too.
Santo,
High cognitive functions like innovativeness or understanding high level STEM concepts etc are mostly by temporal and parietal lobe.
And blacks are impulsive about high level stuff like violence not saying wrong things at wrong time. I think that is a result of weaker parietal temporal.
LOL, Cucker Carlson just called Trump autistic. Philo’s brain is probably exploding right now.
idiot! he called him autistic before trump was ever elected on dave rubin’s show. it’s called “hyperbole”, “metonymy”, “facetious”. look it up!
melo has autism!
No, what’s autistic is believing the only way to save democracy is by making Trump our Fuhrer.
Hes objectively not autistic. According to you everyone is autistic, including yourself. Youre so ridiculous and stupid.
have you forgotten i exist Pill you dumb bitch
“Hes objectively not autistic. ”
How would you know? You don’t even know what autism is!
dealwithit might be very attractive…if she lost 200 lbs.
She had the crazy slut eyes. Marsha agreed with me on that.
i thought you were gay
Wait, was that actually her?
you can tell someone is an NPC when they start using political words no one used just a few years ago. words like “equity”.
here’s a black man calling rr a racist. cue to 30:12.
cue rr defining it like an anal philosopher, but no one actually uses that way.
^^^SUSPICIOUS^^^
so here it is again.
a black man with 100 IQ points over rr calls rr what he is, a racist.
cue to 29:24.
McWhorter is a know-nothing grifter. Sanders said he didn’t know the difference, and I respect that because he admitted that he didn’t know what the difference was. I know the difference, and right-wing pundits (Rufo, Lindsay, McWhorter, Boghossian et al) merely equivocate on the term.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2021/09/12/the-distinction-between-equity-and-equality/
cue rr defining it like an anal philosopher, but no one actually uses it that way.
McWhorter is a know-nothing grifter.
source?
what is your argument?
Anyone who equivocates on a term is a grifter.
McWhorter equivocates on terms.
So McWhorter is a grifter.
I’ve shown that the aforementioned grifter are merely equivocating, for Lindsay and Rufo it’s to get whag they think is “CRT” (it isn’t) out of schools.
Anyone who equivocates on a term is a grifter.
YOU MEAN LIKE 100% OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE WORD “EQUITY”?
YOU MEAN LIKE 100% OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE WORD “EQUITY”?
YOU MEAN LIKE 100% OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE WORD “EQUITY”?
BAN YOURSELF CRINGE TROLL CLOWN!
STILL WAITING…
FOR THE…
1. RECEIPTS.
2. ATGUMENT.
3. EVIDENCE.
THAT A BLACK MAN WHO HAS 100 MORE IQ POINTS THAN YOU IS A…
KNOW-NOTHING GRIFTER.
STILL WAITING!
STILL WAITING!
STILL WAITING!
Are you OK?
STILL WAITING!
this blog sucks everyone here except Mug here is demented beyond your abilities
In abstract a dictator or monarchy is always great if the dictator is someone like FDR or Lincoln or a ‘King David’. In reality, most dictators are Idi Amin or Robert Mugabe. Mugabe should know this since he called himself Robert Mugabe.
I seriously doubt you could get a good king as a handover from another dictator. It would have to be a democracy that selects the good king and then for whatever reason, the good king becomes a dictator.
im the musically talented person in this world thats why all musicians want me to listen to their music
theres also a factor of neglect in all this because there are corrupt garbagemen in the world reading this blog
Puppy said he is a marxist but he doesn’t have any marxist opinions lol.
Puppy would actually want Oprah to be a dictator. Then Oprah can turn the US into a theocracy around ‘The Secret’.
The closest we’d get to an Oprahocracy is if her spiritual guru Marianne Willianson becomes President:
Marianna Williamson if very impressive when she talks about non-spiritual issues.
Indeed. Marianne, Oprah & Barbara Lee were virtually the ONLY three people in America to LOUDLY oppose Afghanistan war BEFORE it began.
How can someone be this smart and be an observant jew? Does she literally pray to Moses or whatever? If she had never mentioned this spiritual stuff everyone would take her very seriously because she is whip smart on issues.
Just ban Loaded his comments are trash and unfunny. My comments are superior.
When Oprah prays on tv with Marianne Williamson, Puppys eyes roll into the back of his head and he is frozen in front of tv and starts chanting.
lol
Is this Lurker or Philosopher?
You’re giving up 50,000 years of evolution? LOL
that black guy is taller than rr sadly.
odds the guy filming this is NOT white AND this is 100% FAKE =
100%!
He asked the white guy not the black guy
Nope.
Respect to that guy.
Guy is a straight clown.
More banks fail and economic catastrophe after economic catastrophe happens but RR still trusts the system. Truly a loyal citizen of clown world.
LMAO!
It’s absolutely amazing how someone can have such little self-awareness.
Like, how does he not feel embarrassed saying stupid shit like that?
stop shilling for the banks.
self awareness doesnt exist idiot Pill shows us why
RR is the white girl in this video:
“I am a scientist”
“I love black cock and listen to rap”
what is your argument that fake hate crimes aren’t real?
where are your receipts?
stop making unevidenced claims that fake hate crimes aren’t real.