Back in May 2022, I wrote:
I have always doubted the historical consensus that Africans sold their own people into slavery. The whole point of slavery is that you’re forced to work without pay. If whites were powerful enough to force millions of blacks to work without pay, they would have been powerful enough to take those workers from black countries without having to pay for them in the first place.
Also, if they were going to pay for slaves, then why go all the way to Africa to get them? The whole point of going to a less technologically advanced region to get slaves is that you can take the slaves by force.
Lastly, if you believe in HBD (which many people dismiss as racist pseudoscience), the average white American is about 15 IQ points higher than the average black American and that gap would have perhaps been 20 points before white genes entered the U.S. black gene pool in large numbers. A 20 point IQ gap (if it reflects a genuine gap in intelligence) is so large that whites would have been dominant enough to simply help themselves to whatever resources they wanted in sub-Saharan Africa (including human ones) without having to pay anyone anything. In fact if whites really had to pay for slaves, it calls HBD into question because it implies a business deal among equal races, not an advanced race enslaving a more primitive one.
Since writing that, I came across a historical figure named John Hawkins, a white man who did indeed catch his own black slaves.
According to wikipedia:
In 1562, he set sail with three ships (Saloman, Jonas, and Swallow) travelling down the African coast as far as Sierra Leone, he captured people and enslaved them as he went, taking around 300 people in total.[5] From there he sailed to the Caribbean, he did not have permission from either Spain or Portugal to trade with their colonies so he sold his enslaved people in Isabella, Puerto de Plata and Monte Christi – places where the local authorities did not enforce government trade embargos.[5] The enslaved people were traded for pearls, hides and sugar.[7][8]
The trade was so prosperous that, on his return to England, the College of Arms granted Hawkins a coat of arms which displays an enslaved male.
Pumpkin Person 
Completely random, but I’ve been interested for a while in Daniel Zhu’s IQ. He seems like one of the most brilliant young mathematical minds.
He got a perfect score at the IMO (he participated only once) and got a gold medal at the International Physics Olympiad, with the third best score at the theoretical part.
Also he is a three-time Putnam Fellow and he would probably be a four-time one, had it not been for the pandemic.
I estimate his math IQ as at least 175.
https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2018/team.cfm?id=1047
the fact that peepee FEARS justine trudeau PROVES peepee is AUTISTIC.
sad.
So would you hire Shontel Williams for your startup or chuck the cv in the bin?
If he had the same qualifications as everyone else, I would interview him.
Jewish privilege is white privilege.
Yes but not in the way you meant. Jews are the real “privileged” supremacist class in Western countries and the world.
Absolutely not. Jews take advantage of their racial status to engage in ethnic nepotism against other whites.
But when you’re a pseudo social justice warrior, you have a very good chance of being a pussy-jew.
Jews do not identify as “generic white” like Italian Americans or any other group of European immigrants.
They play dishonestly as if Judaism is just a religion unrelated with race and not also and especially a political ethnicity.
They and their allies promote the “white privilege” agenda while hiding the greatest beneficiaries today, themselves.
If not, they would openly talk about their own privilege.
Wrong. Over 90% of Jews identify as white.
^^^TOO LOW IQ TO BE ALLOWED TO COMMENT^^^
You really don’t or CAN’T understand…
Your jewish owner doesn’t allowed you to.
And.
Being a mixed-race and totally positive to mixing race actually doesn’t make you less but more racist. Should i explain why???
Nearly 100% identify firstly as a jew. For most of them, their jewishness is more important than their nationality and anything else. This called moral double standard, exactly what Roma gypsies do. What they say to goys is not the same of what they say among themselves.
Hollyweird is freakshly 40% or more jew. Most of so called white privilege in hollywood is jewish but no mainstream media is allowed to talk about it. So what?? There is a very lower chance you will change your confortable point of view of it. But your argument just show how ignorant you are about this subject. Or as tend to happen how consciously ignorant or dishonest you are.
Most of time, they hide their over proportion on places like academia and entertainment blaming “the whites”. And ackowledge this doesnt mean i believe white privilege is an invention or only jews who can be consciously evil. But that white privilege is way more complex than SJWs believes specially because its fundamental intersection with social class that make it a distant reality for most white people who are not of upper classes, even more today. They want to promote the idea that structural racism still exist intact just like a 70 to 100 years ago while despising mostly or totally the structural classism. Why?? Because they chose “white people” to be their scapegoat.
Actually, white privilege by an individual perspective tend to be signficantly less relevant than other “privileges” like heterossexuality, lookingness, mental health status and yes social class. It’s means that there are lots of black and other non white people who are more privileged than many// specific types of whites. Just based on social class or wealth is absolutely conclusive that Oprah Winfrey is signficantly more privileged than great majority of white people all over the world. Actually we don’t need go so extreme. Just a black or other non white with more than 1 million dolars are more privileged than significant % of white people over the world, specially in places like Eastern Europe.
Jews identified as white back in the 1950s when they wanted to get into the Iv league colleges. Once they took over those colleges and the media they started pushing the line that basically they weren’t white i.e. ‘antisemitism’.
Its complicated keeping up with all the lies and fallacies of the jews but objectively, the jews are different to whites qualitatively.
“Nearly 100% identify firstly as a jew”
Yeah, just like Italians 100% identify first with being Italian.
No, retard.
Italian-americans, italian-canadians, australians, argentinians, brazilians or french identify as italians if they were born in Italy or have a very recent italian background like being son of an italian immigrant. Great majority of italian-americans and of any other western country identify themselves in terms of nationality based on the country they were born.
Natalie Umbruglia is an australian singer with italian ancestry but she is by herself australian, not italian. But Fran Drescher no matter how american she is, always place her jewish ethnicity above or at the same level of her american nationality. But it’s not JUST that. Again. So what?? What is your next argument to protect your masters?? If it doesn’t matter to you…
You have masters. I have none. I could overprotect jews because i’m on LGBT spectrum. I’m actually. I’m seeing a future in which [redacted by pp, 2023-05-27] can be totally possible. But it require that capacity to think beyond our own biases. Can you do it?? Nope.
I’m actually ) protecting them…
ANYONE WHO USES THE TERM “WHITE PRIVILEGE” WITHOUT EXPRESSING CONTEMPT FOR THE TERM AND IS A RACIST.
MELO IS A RACIST.
No, I hate all races equally.
melo is mentally retarded.
It must suck being wrong all the time about everything, huh, Mugs?
^^^STOP FORCING YOUR LOW IQ ON EVERYONE ELSE AND STOP COMMENTING.
YOU’RE BEING EXTREMELY RUDE!^^^
Both denying colloquial classifications of race and accepting them at the same time to at one point insert oneself into the white race, and yet still at another point stress one’s belonging to another group (racial or otherwise), is the problem with this kind of idea. It’s a rhetorical device, it has no real consequence beyond that.
The last known occurrence of Homo erectus is 117,000–108,000 years ago in Ngandong, Java according to a study published in 2019.[1]
rr: wikipedia is a know-nothing grifter racist
mugabe: trans guido. sad.
Santo said that those personality disorder categories do not take into account Bipolar ADHD Schizo or Autism.
I made a complete list then of what I think is going on.
Brain damage (mental illness) causes several regulatory systems to fail. Density can be high or low in several different areas. Timing of signal propagation and synchronization. The plasticity of memory. But intelligence still, I think, has to do with white matter because it directs the flow of step-by-step calculation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_principle
Unfortunately, Schizos and Austists aren’t at opposite ends of a spectrum.
Do you have a better model than Friston?
No, but I don’t really need one.
Then you only have a subjective sense of what those are and cannot communicate them just like pill cannot communicate them.
I said probably most of personality disorders are made up because they were not stablished taking the individual context into account. There are apparent personality disorders that are improvised and intuitive adaptations to a sub optimal context. People tend to think in adaptation always as an ideal way but it is not. These personality disorders are mostly context-dependent. And there are psychiatric conditions included some personality disorders that are not context-dependent, they are not totally reactive-adaptative because they express with or without a previous logical context.
Of A, B, and C there are 10 personality disorders.
Which ones are context-dependent, non-context dependent or both?
This is not about a diagnosis of individuals but of what a category represents. Any one of them can be context dependent in the right circumstance but as a category that does not matter only that it is a disorder not caused by context at all.
If we were talking only of symptoms, not personalities then they would be able to mix them.
Like a compulsive schizoid or a histrionic avoidant.
But there are things that can not be mixed:
“(Atisocail-Dependent)”
You cannot have all of them at once that would be impossible because of conflicting reactions.
“(Shizoid-Histrionic)”
–
Disordered Personality is not about labels it is about symptoms.
A compulsive Personality does not mean one washes one’s hands until one bleeds. It is less severe than that but it is in the psychology of the person not the mechanisms of a brain base brain system. It is about self-control in the psyche, not instinct. Anger is not anti-social but antisocial has lots of anger.
The cause is irrelevant because even if one is conditioned one cannot be unconditioned, it is permanent until some new science arrives? Medications cannot change personality in that way neither can talk therapy. Personality is permanent.
My friend is borderline and nothing I do will change that.
Have you ever tied changing a borderline person to not be borderline, it is extremely dangerous not fun, and harmful.
–
What you must answer is why the same conditioning results in different personalities and not the same personality each time.
Abuse can result in any personality therefore context does not matter. It has no predictive power to show where people end up.
I wonder if the French would still vote for Macron today. I guess they would. The media would call them racist if they voted for Le Pen and then like lemmings they would vote for Macron.
Anyone following this civil unrest in Israel? Usually the media would lambast a government for threatening to nerf the courts but since its Mother Israel, the media has to pretend what Netanyahu is doing is really reasonable.
The mulattos from Brazil are really african/ugly looking. If you look at the football team I would guess they are 1/2 or 3/4 African. Why is that?
Poor Brazil.
Brazilian people is on avg not “good looking”. The avg brazilian is a just “ugly” or below “good look”. Too much mixing race, too much phenotypical randomness. But i don’t think British whites are on avg “good looking” either. In Europe, you are often considered the “ugly” ones.
Is French media run by danes Bruno?
LOL, Mugabe didn’t know what esports was and is trying to convince me he’s not a brain-dead retard.
Try harder.
LIAR! RACIST! IDIOT!
you just made that up or your mental retardation led you to that FALSE conclusion.
ban melo.
e-sports = sports for gay uncoordinated nerds who can’t play irl sports. sad.
The US Esports market is worth an estimated $243 million. And is currently the second-largest Esports regional market.
LOL, I love how easy it is to prove you wrong.
If your IQ is 160, mine must be 200!
*Melo and RR trying to find a remotely successful multiracial nation/state that doesn’t have intense classism or racism baked in*
Melo and RR: Wow, I can’t find any! That must mean that white supremacy is global and destroys the economy and quality-of-life of all multiracial societies (while allowing even greater life outcomes for certain homogenous East Asian countries… for some reason). It certainly has nothing to do with genetics, the inherent instability of multicultural societies, or other even other corrupt globalist forces unrelated to “white supremacy”!
INDEED!
NOT BANNING RR AND MELO PERMANENTLY IS SATANIC!
It’s the Jews(whites(self-identifying)).
“That must mean that white supremacy is global and destroys the economy and quality-of-life of all multiracial societies… It certainly has nothing to do with genetics”
Yup, you’re finally starting to get it. Good job, Lurker.Although, I wouldn’t say East Asians have a good quality of life. Only a moron who’s never been to an East Asian country would say that.
indians are top of the list. okay so ctrl+f “jew”. nothing! not on the entire page. “arab” occurs. “egyptian” occurs. “palestinian” occurs. the ONLY explanation is wikipedia is jewish…it’s master editors, controllers are jews.
“israeli” occurs. suprisingly…israelis pretty far down the list…below “syrian”.
so you have to go to the “religion and income” wiki…oh wait…that page was deleted apparently.
and people still wonder why or even if “it”…eejits!
“FACTS don’t care about theories.” — mugabe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income
thankfully pew also says MELO AND RR MUST BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY!