I enjoyed the interview below. I wonder what IQ is required to understand his CTMU. Some argue that communication breaks down when IQ differences exceed 2 standard deviations (SD) so assuming Chris is around +5.9 SD (at least on his second Mega Test attempt) one might expect +3.9 SD to be the threshold but that sounds too high.
I do remember one freakishly high IQ person a couple decades ago who kept a very low profile and claimed people 2 SD above Langan’s level (impossible on the Mega Test) realized the flaws in his theory. This person aggressively lashed out at Langan by saying something like CTMU can’t disprove the unreal’s real: “You can’t deny it and your theory is WRONG!”. Of course this critic could have been the one who was wrong.
“Some argue that communication breaks down when IQ differences exceed 2 standard deviations (SD)”
This is bullshit and a misreading of Hollingworth:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/the-myth-of-the-30-iq-point-communication-range
Related (Langan’s racism):
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/12/08/the-worlds-smartest-man-on-koko-the-gorillas-iq/
notice rr thinks calling people “racist” discredits them.
notice rr and peepee think calling someone a “racist” today isn’t the mere mirror image of calling someone a “[n word redacted by pp, nov 20, 2020] lover” in 1950s alabama.
peepee will delete the last because SHE DOESN’T GET IT!
SEXIEST MAN ALIVE!
https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/l1UqmNPBWQxF1aN9S46Mvw–/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQ3MA–/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/lKHtUu8Bjifji4oKkOPuJA–~B/aD00MjA7dz02MzA7c209MTthcHBpZD15dGFjaHlvbg–/https://media.zenfs.com/en-US/variety.com/056592c85c42475f10133a7f2a70a7f1
at least the latter meant something.
“racist”/”anti-semite” sometimes = saying things that are obviously true.
Notice that I don’t think that.
only because you don’t think anything at all.
langan has a lower IQ than the average man or lesbian with a moustache.
rr reminds me of the norm joke where he says, “i’m a deeply closeted gay man.” then conan says, “so you’re gay.” norm says, “no! why would you think that?”
Exactly
IQists recycle wrong statements made 60 years ago. It’s sad
Two people with the same avg general IQ but different personality type and probablydifferent ideological principles have little alike than two people with different avg general IQ and very similar ideological principles.
Great point.
I’m pretty certain I’m 2 SDs above my dad and I didn’t realise he was thought of as ‘slow’ until relatively later in my 20s. He lied to me about how he did in school and made up a bunch of stories. So I suspected at first that he had early onset dementia as I got older and I tested him for it. Then my aunt told my sister the full story and I was blown away. All my life he had been pretending to understand what I said and faked being academically bright.
So you see it isn’t impossible for a person much dumber than someone to hide it. Especially if they’ve spent their whole life building up coping mechanisms to get by with people by pretending.
One of the stories he told me was that people in the army called him Murdoch only because he looked like the guy from A-Team. He never mentioned that Murdoch was the idiotic comic relief character.
Give your dad the PATMA. If he fails the first 2 items, he’s likely mentally disabled.
He failed the dementia test. He couldn’t draw a clock properly.
For once, I’m willing to trust peepee’s intuitive judgment without reference to even hypothetical statistics, let alone empirical data.
Philo, if your father is at the end of his life, don’t miss this moment.
Think about all his stories as a way for him to make the world a better place for you and above all for you to be proud of him.
If I were you I would give him a feeling of achievement and plenitude starting with warmth and appreciation. Show him love and gratitude.
There is a film that could help you do that : Big Fish from Tim Burton.
Bruno, that is by far the smartest thing I’ve heard on this blog! Great film rec too!
Interesting story about your father….another example that the genetics for intelligence aren’t entirely additive. There’s some dominant/recessive genes from your other side and other interaction effects to explain how someone who is fairly smart could’ve come from someone so dumb!!
Anyone who claims to be 2 sds above Langan is lying. Half the commenters here are also lying about their IQs. [redacted by pp nov 20, 2020]
The person was claiming to know people who were 2 SD above what THIS person THOUGHT Langan’s TRUE IQ was (this person didn’t accept the Mega Test as a valid test). This person was well documented to have a freakishly high IQ (high Mega score though not as high as Langan’s but combined with high scores on other measures) if it’s who I think he was (he left an anonymous comment but I recognized his writing style)
Oh my god.
You based it on an anonymous comment.
This makes me sad.
I’m reasonably sure Langan shares alot of my politics although I’ve never read his thoughts on economics.
The strange thing I always find about Langan is how normal he is compared to most very high IQ people. He has no autism. No neurosis. He’s not ‘nerdy’. He has a very working class background.
I could see myself having a good conversation with Langan but not say, Bill Gates who has zero social intelligence and sounds like a 15 year old girl.
He’s megalomaniacal but extremely high-functioning in most everything. In Outliers, his brothers claimed that he was a legit guitar virtuoso and could draw things picture-perfectly with little effort. In his bodybuilding days, he was absolutely jacked and allegedly could bench 500 lbs.
I don’t think it’s that strange, but definitely rare. The reason he seems a lot more normal and socially adept is probably because his IQ seems to largely be the result of a massive brain. So basically, his IQ is probably stable compared to people who have higher IQs stemming from some sort of manic or obsessive personality type, or whatever underlying intellectual personality type that leads them to a positive intellectual feedback loop. He also seems to have an average white male testosterone level or whatever it is that defines one’s phenotype in the masculine direction, unlike the average Asian male or someone like Bill Gates appears to lack. That’s probably one reason he was able to get so jacked compared to the average nerd.
It is a bit of a mystery to me why he isn’t richer, because while getting super wealthy probably requires a decent amount of psycopathy and/or obsession with money, I can’t imagine that he would have to be that ruthless or obsessed to be pretty wealthy with the (very stable) IQ he has. Especially since he doesn’t have any kids or anything else holding him back…
Someone like Terry Tao also has a huge IQ but he is definitely a nerd and I imagine would be a terrible person to have a few beers with.
Tao has shitlib politics too.
He has no idea what he looks like to people. Check out that haircut.
Hey you might be right about something for once. Maybe Jeff bezos isn’t the richest man alive (sorry Pumpkin, so sad)
Do you think Vladimir Putin is worth more than bezos as some people claim?
Even if you’re too….challenged..to believe russiagate, you can’t deny Putin’s corruption or greed.
They have traced corrupt money being held offshore by Putins closest confidants and aids which they claim is being held on behalf of him. Since putin is the most powerful man in Russia I doubt he needs numerous zeros in his bank account to get what he wants anyway.
How likely do you think it is that the money laundering itself is how he’s been able to keep power for so long? I mean as long as he keeps his little the “confidants and aids” fed he has nothing to worry about, unlike Trump.
PP, stop it . You are in danger.😊 The next step will be a high IQ society of our own 🤦♂️
The 30 point gap is really about how a person will not be able to tell the difference between IQs 30 points above themselves. So any person with an IQ greater than 142, I will not be able to tell if anyone is higher than them. The IQ discretion pumpkin has loses all meaning above 165.
This guy has savant like mental capabilities and isn’t retarded like the usual idiot savant. He has autism though. So i guess he’s socially retarded.
Its actually very impressive what he can do.
I met him. My ex-fiancée and I went to see him give a talk here after his book came out. We were the only non-Jews in attendance. I challenged him on his disdain for IQ tests.
I wonder what his IQ is. I’m sure it’s extremely high but I bet his subtest scores would be all over the place.
Frequent this blog is a kind of mental retardation.
Be you too.
I remember when I was 11 or 12 and my dad wrote down a shopping list and I was laughing because he spelled ‘burger’ as ‘bugger’. I should have realised then.
Im listening to the interview and when Langan keeps saying teachers are now forced to teach the lowest common denominator, I keep inferring that hes against affirmative action.
I have no doubt he’s against it. He probably thinks white males are now the ones being discriminated against
Obviously they should teach the lowest common denominator. You wouldn’t want children not learning about basic fractions, would you?
Langan’s talking about university which is supposed to be higher education
Well we all know you can’t have a high IQ and hold that opinion.
So mystery solved, he’s a retard.
Wait, what?? You can’t be smart and be against affirmative action…nonsense. It makes me think melo probably benefited from the certain ethnic minority caused scam that is affirmative action.
No, you can’t be smart and think the oppression of white people is a thing.
I disagree with AA, but it’s intent is not discrimination. Intent matters.
^^^someone has autism^^^
the intents of aa are:
1. avoid lawsuits.
2. reduce the % of white gentiles among those who really have the power.
3. virtue signalling.
4. placate blacks. stop them from chimping out. mexicans wouldn’t riot if aa were ruled unconstitutional in any form.
the OSTENSIVE intent of aa originally was in fact reverse discrimination to make up for past discrimination. but today its OSTENSIVE intent is just “because diversity is good”. so you get what douglas murray calls the “black old etonian”.
austistic people don’t know what “ostensive” means.
Good explanation but you failed to adequately articulate the most important reason
5. amazon for one prefers a certain level of diversity because it reduces solidarity, the likelihood of unionizing. this is what amazon executives themselves have said.
…
the theory that aa is necessary to keep a diverse country together is false. no aggrieved group other than blacks will resort to mass violence. the gays have one riot at the stonewall inn. were there any others?
aa doesn’t only exclude people directly. it does so indirectly too. if you work for a woke company or a woke government agency and you aren’t woke you’ll be miserable and quit and certainly won’t move up the ranks. is the pope catholic? this is how you get such absurd figures as 95% of harvard professors donated to biden. it’s not because they’re smart. it’s because all the smart people who aren’t like them have been de-selected along the way. iirc, wilton gregory said that american seminaries had become so gay that straight men felt uncomfortable and left.
In the most recent California election, voters actually rejected a referendum that would’ve made explicit AA legal at state universities.
Ofc Asians were the big proponents, but enough blacks and mexicans had to vote against it, too. Probably because blacks and mexicans don’t sympathize with each other’s alleged problems.
They’d rather have “meritocracy” than give up spots to another race.
Mexicans are very docile compared to blacks.
Even the illiterate toothless ones that love PCP.
Being for or against AA is basically what your identity is. It has nothing to do with IQ.
if all aa meant was promoting to possible hires or admits that you weren’t racist then that would be fine, if it were actually necessary.
so a company might try harder to find qualified blacks and chicanos but maintain the same standards for hiring.
Lion of the Blogosphere admits he was duped by Trump about election fraud. Sadly Mug of Pee is not man enough to do the same:
this is how you get such absurd figures as 95% of harvard professors [who contributed to one campaign or another] donated to biden.
i mean if it were 80% that would be fine. but 95%? really?
“man enough”
now, peepee, it’s important to avoid using stereotyping and sexist language
But is he man enough to give an honest review of Culture of Critique?
I don’t know whether or not he likes the CoC
He’d hate it
I’d say he’d like it actually. Its a more tribal way of interpreting the Tribe.
I’m WAY better at reading people than you are and I say he’d hate it. He’d consider it anti-Semitic trash.
The true ceiling of the Mega Test is only about +5SD according some outside analyses, including a very recent one. I think Hoeflin fudged his norms a little bit. I think 46/48 is the one in a million level, and I don’t think tests can discriminate reliably within half a standard deviation of their ceilings.
A superior test to Hoeflin’s with almost as much ceiling is Kevin Langdon’s LAIT, published in the April ’85 Omni: https://imgur.com/gallery/RApmgzl.
It’s multiple choice, but it places more emphasis on ingenuity and perceptiveness instead of esoteric knowledge and your ability to calculate and persist through awkward math problems.
I think whoever scanned that documented misdated it. It’s a well-known fact that Omni published the LAIT in 1979. Probably they confused it with the Mega Test.
Freakish
https://mobile.twitter.com/FernandoLeanme/status/1329481811521662976/photo/1
Are you Irish,PP?
No
I can’t stand Langan, to be honest. Perhaps I (and other people) am really nitpicky when it comes to super high IQ people (SHIQP), but I really think most well-known SHIQP are very often irrational. It might have something to do with them not being very well educated, but maybe not. Marilyn vos Savant has said plenty of silly things and her book on Fermat’s last theorem has been laughed at by mathematicians. Katsioulis seems to be pretty shallow when it comes to his own field (psychiatry).
Terrence Tao seems pretty cool, though.
Also, is Langan’s IQ really that high? He scored 47/48 on his second attempt and that is around 182-183 sd 15 if I’m correct. Very high (assuming the Mega test is that reliable) but still not that impressive. Christian Sorensen probably has a higher IQ.
IQism is silly. They place IQ score over or equal as intelligence real confirmation despising that human intelligence are complex thus diverse.
If you do nothing in your life worthfull but you have a higher IQ score, IQists will believe you deserve the title of unaccomplished genius just because your score.
Langan is Chris’ adoptive father’s surname, what is his actual father’s surname? His mother’s name was Mary Langan-Hansen (surname at birth Chappelle). So does that mean his father was a Hansen? If so, what is up with -sens showing up in the high IQ lists like that? Some Southern Danish-Northern German thing?
“…I really think most well-known SHIQP are very often irrational. It might have something to do with them not being very well educated…”
Interesting! Clearly a less-than-rigorous education in one’s field of exploration can (and probably often does) result in retracement and rediscovery of the known. I suspect that non-fluency in the language and thinking of the field greatly impedes effective communication of one’s ideas to those in the field – the academic “gatekeepers”, if you will. Perhaps the latter (and possibly a measure of the former), together with a bit of compensatory haughtiness in the (sometimes neologistic) expression and elucidation of one’s ideas could account for some of that apparent “irrationality” – even when genuine insights and advances are at issue. I should note that I don’t profess to know whether any of this is applicable to those cited.
Sorry, forgot: Is Steve Schuessler the person who said those things about Langan? Redact and don’t respond, if you think that’d be better, of course.
No
Puppy made up the story. He doesn’t exist
Nope! He exists
Lionel trilling….more like Lionel trolling!
there’s an easy way to get accurate polls.
pay the respondents enough that all repond. so you might be unlucky to sample a rich person. but what % of people will cooperate for $1,000?
probably 99% will answer for a mere 1k and 15- m of their time.
can such data be “combined” with free polls in a rigorous way?
if you get to ask more than one question the polls can be corrected like personality tests contain repeated questions to determine if the testee is a liar.
https://wikidiff.com/formal/colloquial#:~:text=is%20that%20colloquial%20is%20(linguistics,in%20accord%20with%20established%20forms.
PP doesn’t understand IQ has intersectional layers with nonobjective criteria like social status signalizing right here on the link.
IQists believe intelligence is not do a lemonade with the lemons you have but just quantify them.
get over yourself
((((Triggered))))
Learn with your own mistakes is a virtue, pipi
So you let him use the brackets and you ban me. Great.
From every 6 comments made by pill, 10 are wrong, useless or psychotic.
Be a loser is such a sad thing isnt?
Pill is a genius of art to be a loser.
Understanding Langan’s theory is easier if you understand his vocabulary.
All reality follows a syntax that connects everything through consciousness (mind).
All is mind. Practically he has proven mind monism.
This is like the basic summary buy Langan uses fancy vocabulary.
Maybe it’s just your schizophrenia, KitCat
autism – schizophrenia, which is it?
you seem schizoid.
Wow, so it turns out you can take the mega test at home , has no time limit, and is only weakly correlated to professionally administered tests. The 1 professional test he did take has a ceiling of about 160, so the 200+ claim is bullshit.
I read some of his CMTU and it is overly obfuscated garbage that only someone with incredibly limited vocabulary would think is profound. If you actually know what the words mean it won’t work on you. He doesn’t even use any math which you’d expect to see in a “theory to everything”
So long story short, he’s not the smartest man alive, at the most his IQ is 140 or he’s just practiced a lot of IQ tests when he was young (or perhaps both) and you all are gullible autists for falling for it.
I dunno, just hearing him talk makes me pretty certain he’s not lying about acing the old SAT without sweating.
But intelligence =/= being right. They’re pretty weakly correlated.
Sounding smart is easy. The new guy thought my IQ was 134 just from my guest post. My IQ is at the most in the mid 120’s .
And it’s pretty clear he’s already lying about the ABC 20/20 test so why wouldn’t he lie about that? Has there ever been any confirmation of it?
He took the WAIS-III by a professional psychologist in front of an ABC camera crew & the psychologist said Langdan had the highest score he’d seen in 25 years, but then it’s pretty easy to game the wais since the subtests are pretty coachable & unlike the SAT, they don’t change the questions every year. But his Mega Test score is extremely impressive.
But that could all have just been paid sensationalism.
Plus the WAIS isn’t even designed to measure intelligence to that level
Fuck it I’ll take the mega test. Where do I find it?
It’s 134 now
Wer Jude ist, bestimme ich!…
“Intelligence is not being “right” ”
whatever the criteria…
That’s the IQism textbook.
Ron doesn’t score the Mega Test anymore, but you can take the nearly isomorphic Brainbreaker for an unofficial score. Check out pumpkin’s recent blog post about it.
I just read a paragraph from Michelle Obama’s thesis.
Sad!
Even sadder is the fact that a lot (maybe most) of my friends write at a similar level. And I go to a good school!
When do people finally sharpen their language skills? On the job?
Michelle is supposed to be a high academic performer according to Obama in his 2nd book. I have a particularly low opinion of American education and for the same reasons as Chris Langan.
Pill has been brainwashed by the media to worship obama & read his books
I will probably buy his new one. I don’t “worship” people Puppy outside of Mel Gibson…And I never said Obama was a bad president.
I was reading about diversity schemes (i.e quotas) at banks and how they have to fill the NAM (non asian minority) somehow. Melo since you are part asian how would you feel giving a place in an elite organisation to some privileged dummy from the ghetto? Its all nice and could hating whitey but remember without whites there would be no elite organisation. Also remember that all elite orgs need a certain amount of whites to keep the lights on (although asians are competent as well – south and east asians, not so much southeast asians*)
*Although particular cases like Vietnam show high IQs and worker bee personalities.
Once China liberalises its financial industry, I expect some of the names will get a lot more prestige to the point that within my lifetime, probably one current chinese bank or brokerage will enter the bulge bracket.
Chinese people are addicted to gambling.
If I was on the supreme court, Day 1 would be knocking down AA. My second act would be to eliminate money from politics.
Revealing you have no idea what Supreme Court justices actually do
What one justice does, that is
i have to post this again because black lesbian supremacism.
heidegger and hegel were swabians.
my surname can be traced to one of the original swiss cantons, but its ultimate origin is in swabia.
luther and nietzsche were born within 50 miles.
kant was from a part of germany that is now part of russia.
I tend to be wary of saying your surname is reflective of your ancestry when you consider every time a new generation comes along, they share genetics with their mother who loses the surname out of convention. You may even be more non-German than German even with a German surname.
a few names can come from very different places. like m’bala m’bala can come from black africa or from germany. there was a famous nazi named von m’bala m’bala und taxis.
plus surnames originated before standardized spelling, so a single surname can have multiple spellings, many surnames can really be the same.
another source says my surname is from bavaria.
Youre lying Mug just like you lie about everything else! Id put money on the fact that youre an Irish-South Italian mix….kinda like a Denisovan-Neanderthal mix except more primitive!
the point of my comments was…
1. to be part german doesn’t mean much as germany is many countries.
2. my surname means i’m 1/32d switzerdeutsch at most.
sad.
notice “we” doesn’t include the people driving white people off their land.
My head circumference is more pronounced than yours Pumpkin at 23″. And I’m 5 foot 5…
Rick Rosner seems like a cool character not some pathetic chump like Chris Langan. Id be more fascinated by talking to him.
Anyone here think Im not neurotypical? Can I get some diagnoses on here regarding what people think about me. Thatd be great. Thanks in advance.
Are you trolling? Isn’t Rick Rosner the guy that went high school for 20 years because he has arrested development. I also seem to recall he obsessed over being in a quiz show for most of his adult life and feels ‘cheated’ he didn’t win after reviewing 10,000 questions on the show. What a loser.
Why is this banned?
HAHAHAHA You let Teffec say the exact same thing but banned me. Why??
I approved your rosner comment
You’re very eccentric at the very least if you comment on this blog.
Rick Rosner is an obsessive-compulsive twat who intentionally repeated high school several times and maimed himself because he thought girls like scars. Langan is considerably smarter and more interesting IMO, though I can understand finding him obnoxious too.
Didn’t he call up university art departments when he needed money to ask if they needed a nude model? I guess I could file that under the correlation between IQ & liberalism but sadly it’s a bit of an embarrassment to the Hoeflin tests that they selected for someone like him.
I’m talking about rosner, not langan. I respect langan
Yeah he’s a complete weirdo. He likes to shop at gay thrift stores so he can buy fashionable shirts for 2 bucks.
Yeah he claims to possess “highly developed research and persistence skills,” which explains why he was able to do so well on those tests. That’s what at-home, untimed IQ tests measure inherently, especially Hoeflin’s. Obviously a very smart guy but equally disturbed.
Mexicans are weird.
A lot of them took the side of blacks in the Great Chimpout of 2020. I saw a lot of them holding up faggoty anti-cop signs and honking at protestors when they drove by.
But they NEVER intermarry with blacks. EVER. I’ve never seen it.
Just thinking about living standards over the last 30 years or. I know many people in the West basically have the same standard of living they had in the 80s (but with some big technological improvements like the internet). The welfare state has if anything contracted and minimum wages haven’t kept pace either if youre a low IQ person who wants to work.
Where I live we went from being a 2nd world country in Europe to a 1st world one basically by becoming a tax haven. As a liberal in the past I would admonish people for saying countries should copy us because its bad for the entire world and its basically beggar they neighbour in terms of trade. I now realise I was wrong and our policymakers were correct to make us a tax haven even if it means standards of living stagnate elsewhere.
There have been some other bright spots like China and parts of east asia but it seems technological development (i.e. productivity has trebled since the 80s) is not enough. If people want their standard of living to rise in America it won’t come from being a tax haven or a copycat. They will have to fight for more of the pie. The middle and lower classes have been losing ever since Reagan/Thatcher. There needs to be some sort of civic will that in the past led people to create unions and political parties. More fight. Less techno babble.
Of course the other thing to note – maybe the current standard of living is ‘good enough’ for most people. Japan has stagnated for 30 years too, but its quality of life due to its low crime, low immigration and civic minded leaders and peoples is quite good.
At the end of the day we equate development with materialist desires and maybe we should just learn to be happy with our lot too. The Warren Buffet philosophy is “this is the greatest time in history to be born in a first world country”.
the civil war never ended.
it’s like how a southern accent can be:
1. “white trash” OR
2. “jesus christ! i thought boston brahmins were upper class.” shelby foote had an upper class southern accent.
the everglades club has still had no black memebers and probably no jewish members.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everglades_Club
an upper class southern accent:
foote was 1/4 jew. so his’s recorded.
the most upper class southern accents aren’t recorded, because mass media is prole.
you have to hear them in person.
Mrs Duncan is an example of a Southern accent that isn’t low class. A true southern belle:
religious about bannon’s post election podcast…
yesterday he interviewed another math major heideggerian, darren beattie.
darren claims to be jewish.
he’s just one of many jews who admit heidegger’s greatness.
that’s how great heidgger is.
200 years from now it may be philosophy is philosophers are regarded in the same way poetry and poets are now…but heidegger will survive this megele/angel of death selection.
unz is OBVIOUSLY CIA.
the pill personality said, “that’s ridiculous.”
therefore the pill personality has autism.
If he was CIA, why give people access to Sailer, Striker, Atzmon, Weber, MacDonald, etc.?
Why not just host prole-tier holocaust denial and shit about No Planes!!11! ??
Hes not CIA. Just an intellectually open guy
the point is to track his readers IPs and to hold his readers attention so they do nothing. but he may nor be CIA per se. i just mean he’s a state actor. his website is a front.
I’d believe more in pizzagate then Unz being a front. His website was put on a list of hate group websites by the SPLC.
My problem with Rosner is that he has said that his IQ, as tested in school, was just around 150 and he suggested that that was because the ceiling turned out to be a little more than 150. But that seems illogical to me, because his IQ might theoretically be 200 had he reached the ceiling, but since he didn’t, his IQ should be what it was measured to be. So, 1) He’s either lying, or, more probably, he deluded himself, 2) His actual IQ is probably around 150 (sd15 I guess?) but his massive experience with such tests made him score as highly as he subsequently did.
I asked him about it and he ignored me.
His IQ as measured by the titan test is much higher than 150. But the Hoeflin tests are unsupervised, untimed, & taken open-book. Whether such unconventional methods give valid IQ results is an open-question but it was interesting experiment.
That’s what I’m saying. He scored much higher, but I’ll take his earlier results more seriously, because he wasn’t as experienced as later on. I think he also took the mega test? I recall that vos Savant told him his score wasn’t high enough to join the mega society but he said that later on, it was enough. Probably around 172 sd15, I guess?
maradona died. argentina will have a month of a mourning. if he were black like pele he’d be the first story on the nightly news.
by time magazine metrics, pele is the most influential black man on the planet (if you don’t count mixed-race obama):
https://pumpkinperson.com/2020/06/23/time-magazines-most-influential-living-people-ever/amp/
here SI gives maradona the #1 spot. not pele. he gets #2.
https://www.si.com/soccer/2019/05/21/50-greatest-footballers-all-time
mugabe prediction:
when sandy koufax dies this will be the first story on every nightly news broadcast.
bob gibson’s death wasn’t. he was black not jewish.
i have to repeat my IQ test question…
why does whether there was election fraud or not…NOT matter?
(not matter to whether bannon is just seeking a pardon or not)
describe two reasons.
hint: election fraud can be intentional intensionally or it can be un-intentional extensionally.
mugabe’s body type is the cartoon male body type. therefore, even though women say they like long legs…because sitting down i’m 4″ taller than afro…i’m sexier.
peepee doesn’t know the history of aa in america.
in the bakke case one supreme commented how jews were conspicuously OPPOSED to aa. (will find quote later. but here’s this https://www.jta.org/1978/06/29/archive/jewish-organizations-hail-court-ruling-in-bakke-case-say-it-vindicates-their-stand-against-quotas)
now jews are almost all in for aa.
but the guy behind the asians vs harvard suit is a jew.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Blum_(litigant)
Jews opposed AA when a lot of them were competing with blacks for government jobs. But they lost interest when they realized moving away from blacks was easier than dealing with them.
That’s also why neocons lost interest in domestic policy and became exclusively preoccupied with israel.
today i expect karpov is just regarded as a loser, but he was 34 when he face kasparov and had been the most active champion ever for 13 years.
he beat the half jewish korchnoi twice in the world championship.
in general gentile world chess champions have been BORING/POSITIONAL.
iirc, humans are closest to gorillas in body, closer to chimps in genes.
john holmes was super skinny and gross…
only after he became a cocaine addict and was infected with HIV.
the young john holmes was a better than average looking guy.
if peepee thinks i’m a freak she should check out phelps.
it’s almost as if michael jordan is…
SHORT!
My torso/arms would be identical to jordan’s if i was jacked. my height’s in my legs.
fiasco: lionel trilling (aka “because it would be rude.”) :: bogart: ?
VERY high IQ question.
I probably know the most about islam here. at least theologically.
Can evolution be environmentally influenced!?!