(special tanks to commenter Mikey Blayze for suggesting this article)
Aleister Crowley (1875-1947) was a British occultist, writer and mountaineer. Calling himself “the Beast 666”, he founded the religion Thelema, which may have paved the way for New Age, Wicca, Discordianism, Chaos Magick and Satanism.
Arguably the most influential religious leader of the last century, he’s been credited with inspiring a 1960s counterculture characterized by “hippies, social justice warriors, free love, rock music and copious amounts of psychedelic drugs, particularly cannabis and LSD” and is cited as an influence by such counterculture figures as Timothy Leary, Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, The Doors, David Bowie, the Beatles and sexual revolutionary Alfred Kinsey.
Dubbed the wickedest man in the world by the British press, Crowley practiced “every form of sexual deviancy known to man”, in addition to “eating feces, cannibalism and promoting human and animal sacrifice” according to blogger Matt Frohlich.
Crowley also had a very sadistic side. According to historian Gary Lachman, when on a mountain climbing trip, Crowley would whip the South Asian servants to remind them the white man was in charge. When his fellow climbers got tired of this sadistic racism and decided to dump him, Crowley warned that they could never survive the trip down without him, and then sat in his tent drinking tea, as he listened to them die.
Lachman describes an “autistic exactitude” and literalism that caused Crowley to debunk the saying “a cat has nine lives” by killing a cat nine times.
So what was his IQ?
I typically try to estimate people’s IQs from their most salient biological or demographic traits, and then see if there’s any psychometric data to confirm or debunk the statistical prediction. The most salient bio-demographics for Crowley were his incredible influence (as commenter Gypsy advised me), his elite education, and his sexual deviance.
Bio-demographic prediction
Influence is hard to measure, but in 2002, the British public worshiped Crowley enough to elect him one of the 100 greatest Britons of all time. He was the 73rd most worshiped Brit of all time and the 42nd most worshiped of the 20th century (at least at the time the poll was taken).
To understand how impressive that is, consider that about 11.5 billion people lived in the 20th century. Assuming about one in 114 of them were Brits (that’s the current ratio), then nearly 101 million Brits lived during the 20th century, so ranking 42nd is a one in 2.4 million level achievement!
If there were a perfect correlation between IQ and popular influence, we’d expect Crowley to have an IQ 74 points above the British mean of 100 (the one in 2.4 million level) but the correlation between IQ and worldly power is kind of like the correlation between height and physical power. There’s a noticeable connection between the two, but lots of huge noticeable exceptions as well. With a correlation coefficient of only about 0.4, instead of having an IQ 74 points above 100, we’d expect Crowley to have an IQ 0.4(74) points above 100. In other words an IQ of 130.
However this is likely an underestimate because Crowley was not just spectacularly powerful (in terms of popular impact on society) but highly educated. Even when you compare him to other 20th century Brits that ranked among the most worshiped Brits of all time, Crowley’s Cambridge credential puts him behind only 3% of these super elites [Alan Turing (who graduated from both Cambridge and Princeton), Stephen Hawking (who graduated from both Cambridge and Oxford)] and comfortably ahead of the 84% who have neither an Oxbridge nor Ivy League background.
Thus even when compared to the most worshiped Brits of the 20th century, the greatest of the great, Crowley’s in the 91st percentile academically.
If there were a perfect correlation between IQ and academic credentials, we’d expect Crowley to be 20 IQ points smarter than the average IQ 130 super influential person, since in typical samples, the 91st percentile is 20 IQ points above the mean and assuming elites have similar variability, that should be the case for them too. However the correlation between IQ and education is far from perfect, though until recent decades, it was a potent 0.7, just like the correlation between height and basketball ability.
But because super elites are slightly restricted sample in terms of both IQ and education, the correlation would be slightly less; around 0.64.
So instead of being 20 IQ points smarter than the average most worshiped 20th century Brits, Crowley would be 0.64(20) points smarter, and since the most influential Brits of the 20th century likely average about IQ 130, that would put his expected IQ at incredible 143!
On the other hand, Crowley was a sexual deviant, and these tend to have IQs about 10 points lower than their non-deviant counterparts, so we might expect Crowley’s IQ to be 133 instead of 143. Whatever biological damage messed up the sexual part of his brain, likely hurt the cognitive parts of his brain as well, making him somewhat dumber than other equally educated 20th century icons.
Psychometric data
I often estimate IQs from drawings, since this is a readily available way people have demonstrated cognition for tens of thousands of years, and drawing a person is one of the oldest and simplest psychometric tests. Commentary gypsy informed me that Crowley left behind such drawings and so I found one here:
I would give this about a 9 out of 12 on the “Quality scale” of the Goodenough-Harris Draw-a-Person test, which is about 1.35 standard deviations above the sex-combined norms of 15-year-olds (roughly on adult level); equating to an IQ of 120.
But since the above norms are from circa 1962 and Crowley’s drawing is from circa 1921, and the Flynn effect increased scores on this test by 0.26 IQ points per year (at least in Brazil), Crowley’s score likely would have equated to an IQ 131 if measured by the norms of his era. It’s also possible that Crowley’s drawings were deliberately primitive for stylistic reasons.
Of course Draw-a-Person is one of the least accurate IQ tests ever made, so we should supplement it with another measure of ability, this time preferably a verbal one to add variety. Although Crowley never took a verbal IQ test that I’m aware of, he did leave behind his writings.
According to historian Gary Leachman, Crowley’s poetry was “derivative”. From this we might guess he had only average verbal IQ for a writer, but since writers average superior IQs of 120, we might tentatively assign him a verbal score of 120.
So if writing samples gives an IQ of 120, and a drawing sample gives an IQ of 131, it’s tempting to average these to an IQ of 126 (top 5%). However it’s much more rare to average in the top 5% on multiple tests than it is to score in the top 5% on any one test. On the WISC-R IQ test for example, people who average in the top 5% on all subtests, score above the top 1% (IQ 137) on the composite score. Thus I tentatively assign Crowley an IQ of 137. This is 4 points higher than the 133 I predicted from bio-demographic data above, but both suggest an IQ in the mid 130s.
Such an IQ is above the average at even the most prestigious universities in the World, and may help explain why a young Crowley beat the President of the Cambridge chess club at chess.
Pumpkin Person 
Pumpkin Head evolution idk if you already know this, evolution has already created an animal that cannot die of old age.
How long until an animal that can’t be killed whatsoever develops? It should be an inevitability.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii
“Pumpkin Head evolution idk if you already know this, evolution has already created an animal that cannot die of old age”
I did not know this, thanks for the info. The next stage is to figure out how to get advanced life forms(with a brain) to develop this immortality. Though it appears that it’s not true immortality but rather a reversal of the life cycle under adverse conditions. So it would be like you reverting to a fetus but in such a case what happens to your memories and your acquired characteristics in life. It’s kind of like a reset button and technically that is not immortality.
Regardless, most individual medusae are likely to fall victim to the general hazards of life as Megaplankton, including being eaten by predators or succumbing to disease.
Only a matter of time before a truly immortal biological species, develops. Again I believe the only adaption, is the species full genetic code, existing outside space and time.
“Again I believe the only adaption, is the species full genetic code, existing outside space and time.”
That sounds like near-godhood. I won’t disagree with you, I have the same feeling(some kind of transcendence, perhaps as electromagnetic radiation though not necessarily outside space and time, assuming that is even possible) though I believe this may take millions of years assuming we don’t get wiped out by an asteroid a black hole our own sun exploding, the andromeda galaxy that is hurtling our way and will cross paths with the milky way in about 4 billion years or our own stupidity(the most likely cause).
Since an evolutionary adaption to stop dieing from time, has already occurred. How do we know an evolutionary adaption that stops an organism from die-ing from threats inside space has not already occurred?
It’s may explain why we die or why life is finite, because in its genesis life evolved from a virus, seems a ”lost link” between a organism and and inanimate element.
PP, on the [redacted by pp, April 11, 2019]
which is more gross?
oprah or this picture?
[redacted by pp, April 11, 2019]
Oprah’s far too dignified to be gross
You’re very gross actually
You seem like someone who would slobber when they talk
Women & gay men might like you as a friend because of your irreverent sense of humour, but they would never have sex with you
Funny is so unsexy
from now on i’m just going to post human-horse sex pictures until peepee recants her heresy…
until peepee proclaims that oprah is EVIL AND HIDEOUS.
The more hideous people think she is, the more brain size she needed to adapt, especially in a field as visual as TV
She’s probably more evil than the average American, but less evil than the average super rich or influential person, most of whom are sub-clinical psychopaths
Langan SO close to naming them…if this is real…
Langan says the word racist in scarequotes.
i would be very shocked if a 200iq person without aspergers hasnt noticed denmark.
Actually there are lot of less smart people like taleb or chomsky who should figure it out. I think chomsky once said that israel is the us lapdog hahaha. This shows high iq because it makes you laugh.
chomsky is a part of the tribe so he knows on some level. his rhetoric is extremely sophisticated though. taleb seems like a good self promoter more than anything. typical levantine
That reminds me of the time donald trump made his era defining speech talking about “media and financial elites”. My personal take on this is that it at least shows hes aware of the idea of a hidden hand in society. But obviously in his personal life his daughter is married to a real estate barons jewish kid. Trump probably offered her in the same way kings and queens in the past to build alliances.
So i was wondering what people think of the fed secretly printing money and handing it to individuals? I think it happens. And if didnt happen then someone right now is working on putting patsies in the fed to do it. Its the ultimate theft.
If you agree with the above you go into a pretty dystopian territory where a cabal with access to monopoly money controls everything.
Socialism for the rich.
Capitalism for the poor.
Whoever made that pithy observation deserves an award.
Of course pully think people like zuckerberg gates ad rain man are the elites
At least gates & zuckerberg exist, unlike your imaginary money printing trillionaires
Do you not think trillionaires exist (eg the Rothschilds) or that there are money printers printing unlimited money (pretty much what happens in America)?
Only pill is dumb enough to believe in trillionaires
I am also perplexed on why Pumpkin denies that there could possibly be accounts unconnected to the economy with trillions of dollars in them.
I think the newish obsession with blacks has always been about using them as a trojan horse.
Well thats what i thought until i walked into a bookshop today and realised how many books were about oppressive white men towards blacks. Im getting to the point where it possible some of the danish publishers and book agents and so forth must actually believe some of it.
There are books that could basically be written in crayon to reflect the intellectual depth but they are hundreds of pages!
So conclusion is if u strapped robert rubin or elliot abrams or wolofowitz into a lie detector test its very possible they would pass it when asking what they think about blacks not all of it would be bulsshit.
Bernie 100% believes it. But from an old marxist pov. As in the blacks are worth rasing up if only because they happen to be the poorest. Its more about class. If the chinese were he poorest minority he would bang that drum.
Essentially these media offerings amount to making whites pay to be criticised so you wonder who actually buys these things (certainly not blacks). Its very weird when you consider all those 200 or so books i saw might not even sell but they will always be produced. Very twilight zone almost.
Same with the movies. That new kkk klansman movie and the new birth of a nation….there is no audience for theae….but the danish keep churning them out eve if it destroys sales and budgets.
And so we link this back to my original thepry of a hidden hand thats not comcerned about maling or losing money because money means nothing to them if they own the fed.
Basically the the conspiracy works as a bunch of rings of influence. And within these rings some of the stars and planets are contacted by stars and planets in the ring preceeding it and given bribes or threats or more tradional authoritative/bureacratic power to do stuff. If you keep peeling the onion you get to the guys that print unlimited money for themselves and they will murder anyone that knows about it or tries to stop it. You might even get an o brien type speech about how the whole system brings order freedom human rights yadda yadda compared to the status quo before. There are probably even some gentiles at the core. Why not? For example rockefeller.
I didn’t think it was possible for anyone to be this gullible.
it has never occurred to peepee than anyone could be as gullible as she is. amazing.
https://images.app.goo.gl/JxFbqEgFeCTpB4NC7
Its entirely possible there are trillions of dollars just sitting in accounts unconnected to any economy.
Why is this stance being thrown under the bus?
Because there’s no reason to believe it. There’s no evidence & it explains nothing that can’t be more parsimoniously explained by known facts.
Also Pills theory of some movies, being made “simply to promote a hidden agenda” is not just plausible, but also very likely.
Movies, have been around for 100 years now, and “stories” have existed for hundreds of thousands of years. The perfect story that everyone will love and never get tired of no many how many times told, and therefore guarantee a profit at the box office, has been formulized, and yet every year some movies just don’t earn back the budget and greater.
Thats blatant proof, its not “always” about the money
Because there’s no reason to believe it. There’s no evidence & it explains nothing that can’t be more parsimoniously explained by known facts.
The majority of humans believe in things that have no proof or evidence. Your giving Pill far too much credit to assume he is a 100% rational actor.
a “stall-ian” is someone in a bazaar who hawks his merchandise from a stall.
like “coster-monger” except “-ian”.
Of course another theory is that all the politicians are being brived and blackmailed with pictures of them touching men or kids. This thepry has a lot of evidence e.g. pizzagate. So basically no money supply control, but all the important butecrats and influencers are hogtied.
This theory is a little more earthy. For sure there are politicians cough marco runio cough who are blackmailed by tgeir private lives. So it could be people in one of the inner rings using these sultry kind of methods. Not the core or nomenklatura.
Pizzagate is ridiculous. That’s the perfect example of “if you’re looking for something you’re going to find it.”
given how many obviously retarded and incompetent people are in positions of power, it’s obvious they’ve been placed there by the real power. obama’s entire cabinet came from an email from a mongolian citibank executive.
FACT: podesta’s brother collects art depicting satanic child sexual abuse and has a sculpture of one of dahmer’s victims.
FACT: podesta was asked by his brother to attend a “spirit cooking” performance art show by https://twitter.com/artistispresent?lang=en.
FACT: jeffrey epstein is a blackmailer. blackmail is the basis of his fortune.
at a certain point the truth can be so ridiculous that it needn’t be hidden as no one would believe it.
the very term “conspiracy theory” used derisively or used to dismiss is part of the conspiracy. DUH!
[redacted by pp, April 13, 2019]
given how many obviously retarded and incompetent people are in positions of power, it’s obvious they’ve been placed there by the real power
The real power that placed them there is their Forbes 400 campaign contributors & the media. No need to believe in secret trillionaires running everything when known billionaires like Sheldon adelson, the koch brothers, Haim Saban & George Soros are openly buying politicians
And the real power doesn’t have to be an individual or “master” as pill calls it. Real power can be organizations like big pharma, the NRA & AIPAC.
The behaviour of politicians can be predicted from their lobbyists & advisors. Trump is owned by the likes of Sheldon adelson & advised by Kushner hence ripping up the Iran deal. Obama was owned by Wall Street. Bush & Cheney were brainwashed by wolfowitz. Congress is owned by AIPAC & the NRA. And everyone is owned by the likes of Sulzberger, Jeff Zucker & google because they control the media
Invoking conspiracy theories about secret trillionaires violates Occam’s razor when there are totally obvious explanations
but peepee has no explanation for WHY somalis dominate media except the jordan peterson retarded explanation that it’s from their high viq.
[redacted by pp, April 13, 2019]
Actually I was the first to criticize Peterson’s explanation. A 10 point verbal IQ gap can’t possibly explain why 2% of the population is 50% of the media.
But pill’s theory that they’re secretly printing trillions of dollars & handing it out to each other like candy is far more idiotic than even Peterson’s
Only someone with an all pervasive developmental disability could believe that
We need a new analysis on the Jew IQ.
PP
Actually a 10 point IQ difference will give a sub population a 30x advantage at the genius level meaning that the 6 to 10 million(if we include partial ancestry) Jewish Americans would produce geniuses at a rate equivalent to a population of 180 – 300 million people(whose IQ averages at 100). There is no surprise that they dominate media especially since this plays to their strength. IMO verbal IQ might be the most important IQ variable for social success and plays an important role in business success(of which media is a huge facet). Now it appears that their non verbal IQ might be just below average which sort of balances things out a little. Mind you I still contend that their IQ advantage is in part cultural but even if we assume that their overall IQ is only just 6 points above white america that still gives them an 8x advantage and in theory comprising of 35% of US geniuses of European origin(which is actually close to the actual number of Jewish US nobel prize winners if I’m not mistaken).
On a little side note and touching on what The Philosopher was talking about IMO the recent increasing push for diversity in movies and it’s subsequent push on the populace can in large part be perfectly mapped on to the percentage of revenue by US media from the international market in the last 30 years. in the late 80s the international market was only 30% of BO revenue, today those figures are reversed and the US market brings in about 30% and the remaining comes from the international market. Seeing as media is in large part run by Jews it is easy to see why they are being blamed for the current possibly unmeritocratic push for diversity(particularly favoring black communities). But this in my view is not some insidious drive to destroy white america but can adequately be explained by economics. It’s all about the money, media and entertainment in the US brings in almost 800 billion(film and TV entertainment at about 20% of that). So you see there is huge money with this, it eclipses arms sales by a huge margin, if diversity brings in the dough then diversity it is.
I watched Hellboy yesterday(big mistake) and the story was situated in the UK. The two other main protagonists in the movie were british nationals however one was of Chinese ancestry and the other was a mixed black girl. So you see this is their attempt to hit all the “right” notes, to make sure they cast the widest demographic net possible. These tactics might fall flat in the US but they do famously well internationally. I wouldn’t be surprised if Hellboy did exceptionally well in China(a huge market) even though it is a truly terrible movie iffy casting aside(15% or Rotten Tomatoes). This is happening more and more lately and I personally do not see it subsiding at all. The only way it would be reduced would be through some kind of backlash if people realize that nonsensical things like a mixed black girl(about 1% of the UK population) and a UK national of chinese ancestry(0.5% of the UK population) would have the only two other starring roles in a movie situated in the UK. I mean personally i have no problem with the casting of diverse actors but when this sort of thing starts going OTT(as it is clearly happening more and more) people are going to notice and simply reject it. I mean not too long ago the BBC put out a series about Troy and Achilles and Zeus were black. These people are insane, they have no respect for the cultures they are capitalizing on for their monatery gain and ideological push. I have no problem with black people or the fact that they are getting more and more roles(good for them) I just think that we should be going about these things in a logical way, lets not lose our heads here.
So it appears that the regressive open borders la la land far left(which is a small but vocal minority) and corporate interests are aligning perfectly well(mostly corporate greed if you ask me). Throw in access to cheap labor(either by moving shop or through porous borders) and easy access to resources and frictionless trade it really is a no brainer what is going on. One could argue that the silver lining in all this is that it may create greater unity throughout the world and bond and connect people better but I fear that if they go about it in the wrong way(almost inevitable given that this is mostly driven by greed) it may backfire. It’s not the fault of the Jews though it is the fault of the elites(among which Jews are however over-represented).
Actually a 10 point IQ difference will give a sub population a 30x advantage at the genius level meaning that the 6 to 10 million(if we include partial ancestry) Jewish Americans would produce geniuses at a rate equivalent to a population of 180 – 300 million people(whose IQ averages at 100).
But producing 30x as many verbally brilliant people would not result in 30x as many media giants, because there’s a lot more to media success than just verbal IQ. If Jews were a few inches taller than Gentiles on average, we would not expect them to be 50% of the NBA, let alone 50% of elites in fields even less correlated with height.
in the late 80s the international market was only 30% of BO revenue, today those figures are reversed and the US market brings in about 30% and the remaining comes from the international market.
But most of that foreign revenue comes from places like Russia and China, not Africa, so I don’t see that explaining the increasing percentage of blacks in U.S. movies
“But producing 30x as many verbally brilliant people would not result in 30x as many media giants, because there’s a lot more to media success than just verbal IQ.”
That is right, I’m assuming all else equal(which would still give them an advantage) though it may well be that they also have a high social IQ which I believe is the other crucial parameter for business endeavours(though we might want to make the distinction that their social IQ would be of the shrewd street smart variety). Also, I suspect that they have poured themselves into media particularly(smart of them) and academia but are under-represented in other business endeavours or economic sectors.
“But most of that foreign revenue comes from places like Russia and China, not Africa, so I don’t see that explaining the increasing percentage of blacks in U.S. movies”
You are right about China but not Russia(tiny fraction of revenue, equivalent to Spain despite being 4 times the size). So what is going on with blacks in Hollywood I reckon is a combination of things.
a) They might be focusing more into entertainment and sports rather than business or academia which won’t fully explain why they are so insanely overrepresented lately(30% of Oscars in 2019 from just 13% population) but it will give it some legitimacy.
b) Most of Hollywood are looney lefties(predominantly the actors slightly less so the directors but probably not the producers management or CEOs). Which means this is likely on some level to please them along with the rest of the left leaning populace and so give legitimacy to this whole push.
c) Also note that there is a massive push to elevate women and put them in positions of power in hollywood(starring in action roles, female directors, Kathleed Kennedy ceo of lucasfilm and other women in positions of power). What is happening right now in the US is that women are far more left leaning than men and at this juncture are increasingly banding together with blacks and other minorities in an attempt to wrestle power away from white men. As such I think it is all part of the package.
d) Note that Hollywood is overwhelmingly Democrat which means that they are also pandering to the black vote(without it they simply have no chance). Also most transnational corporations are also heavily on the democrat side(particularly tech) with the exception of oil arms and tobacco industry which are traditional Repubican backers. Most of the top fortune 500 overwhelmingly donate to the Dems.
https://www.businessinsider.com/fortune-500-companies-republican-democrat-political-donations-2018-2?r=US&IR=T#lockheed-martin-13
So of all the reasons I gave I think that Democrats vying for the black vote is the biggest reason for black over-representation(lately that is, it isn’t that clear how long it will last in as much as the average US movie goer is concerned).
“(though we might want to make the distinction that their social IQ would be of the shrewd street smart variety)”
Note that by this I’m not necessarily saying that Jews are shrewd in a malevolent way nor that this is the only characteristic of their social IQ but rather this is the type of social intelligence necessary for business success.
I have no animosity towards Jewish people, I actually admire what they have achieved, find them fascinating and feel that they are not any more “evil” than any other ethnicity. Are they strongly advocating for their people’s best interest? Of course they are, do you blame them? People tend to be envious of successful people and try to ill-define and bring them down and Jewish people are nothing if not successful.
And the real power doesn’t have to be an individual or “master” as pill calls it. Real power can be organizations like big pharma, the NRA & AIPAC.
Why cant “master” and big Pharma both co exist?
Why can’t the Easter bunny exist too?
Somethings not right here. The Litteral and mythological are being crossed.
The Easter bunny is real in the sense its an actual. Animal the rabbit.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit&ved=0ahUKEwipr4S4gM7hAhUPM6wKHeBACOEQmhMIdDAN&usg=AOvVaw0TOCHMQVWuseohJXz01G_n
Its also, fake in the sense no rabbit has the mind of a human.
Is it possible Pill is also mixing the Litteraly and mythological?
Hmm if we look at it from this perspective, then it becomes likely there is a “master” but what Pill says “master” is doing is completely false.
What the fuck hahahaha!? Big Pharma and other institutions of power are FAR more likely to have power than an individual that Pill refers to as “Master” or any stupid notions of individuals gaining significant control within our society.
[redacted by pp, April 13, 2019]
Exactly. Even the most powerful person in the world has very little power compared to large interest groups.
real power is never at the individual level, but sadly psychotics like pill over-mentalize so they can’t imagine structural power; everything must be reduced to a single anthroporphized mastermind he calls “master”
WordPress doesn’t pay me enough to deal with these morons
Even the most powerful person in the world has very little power compared to large interest groups.
So you guys are officially declaring your subscriptions to the mind parasite’s control humanity hypothesis?
And I dont have to say mind parasites. I could use the terms spirits, ghosts, memes ideas, gods, etc. I just view mind parasites as the most accurate term
So wait Pill thinks there’s an Emperor Palpatine like dark overlord, secretly pulling everyone’s strings for his own single interest?
Makes no sense, because even Palpatine being emperor was public knowledge in his own universe.
also a “stall-ian” who hawks his “wears” is a boxwallah selling his underwear from a stall after his box is emptied.
Its chinatown jake.
Basically im thinking that even if you got all the people in the inner rings and core to commit suicide somehow you would still end up with the same celestial framework just different actors in a fiat money system. Jake is told basically ‘the corruption is the actual essence not his ideals which are more fake and/or somehow this whole system works even if doesnt meet boy scout standards.
I think people have to accept. We. Me. You. Have to accept high iq psychopaths or later their children who may or may not carry on those personality traits (intelligence and psychopathy are not 100% inheritable) will always control everything unless you go back to a feydal system where the king is the king no matter how crazy or dumb he is.
If you want to measure its public benefit. Just ask how the system treats its workers. I would say pretty good considering leople are giveb a decent degree of freedom ( as long as they work for Master), the systm doesnt necessarily breed more psychopaths and people dont have to fight for Master on the battlefield if they dont want. There are ways for intelligent people to be more or less free by being entrepreneurs or gamblers or whatnot. Of course the only thing you are not allowed do is be tribal unless you are jewish. Everthing else is ‘race-ist’.
Man im a genius.
“Basically im thinking that even if you got all the people in the inner rings and core to commit suicide somehow you would still end up with the same celestial framework just different actors in a fiat money system>”
thats because the real leader, is not the man but the idea (meme) behind the man. the unconscious controlling the actions. We are dealing with mind parasites. How the hell do we kill something, that has no physical form?
Could this be a new profession? Mind parasite hunter?
Pumpkin, since the similarities practice effect is 2.5 points- did they calculate it by taking the number of people who got a full 5 point increase vs people who got no increase and average them, or did they use a T-score system?
it’s just the average increase of everyone. Some people likely even had a negative practice effect (did worse on the second testing).
Pumpkin, how the hell would Vocabulary have a .5 point practice effect increase while similarities has a 2.55 increase? Wouldn’t it be more likely that vocab has a higher practice effects do to its crystallized nature. And how the hell does WAIS IV comprehension subtest only have a 1 point practice effect? It’s pretty much as fluid as the similarities subtest. Or, is it just that the similarities instructions are much more “confusing” than the comprehension ones. The comprehension ones are just “what would you do”, or “why is this like this”. Also, the information subtest has a 4 point increase when it’s just as crystallized as vocabulary.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2019/03/11/was-michael-jackson-a-child-molester/comment-page-1/#comment-123304
Look at what i found!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615000446
The avarage 94 iq armenoid turks (not the white ones in the west as they are immigrants from the 19th century) were smart enough to cause fear and havoc upon europe, but also to rebuild the largest city in europe, previously destroyed by the venecians.
Constantinople?
the real reason is that non-mongolians find media and finance to be “icky”.
the exception is the talent, excluding journalists. that is, non-mongolians do sometimes value genuine artistic skill. but the idea of turning art into a business is icky to them, just the way investment banking is icky to germans.
and why in the US most of all? in canada and australia the big media owners are non-mongolians: murdoch, packer, lord beaverbrook, conrad black, the thompsons.
the fact that measures of power and accomplishment differ from one country to the next for mongolians to a degree which can’t be explained by differing %s of the respective populations demonstrates that the pennisson explanation is retarded.
but then what happens when the founder dies? look what happened to disney.
the somali/russian mafia went in with gas pipe in a diamond mine in liberia. this just shows there’s no way to know how rich these guys really are in terms of annual income. pretty sure escobar at his peak was making more per year in hard cash than any forbes 400 member is making in dividends.
i have read that the mafia accounts for 7% of italian GDP. that means its top dons should be in escobar territory. but the point is they have to keep it on the downlow. so naturally frankie boy’s house in si was only worth $1m.
https://mafiainafrica.investigativecenters.org/
Forbes typically estimates wealth by identifying & appraising all the biggest assets in the world & then figuring out who owns what percentage of them
In rare cases wealth is estimated by guessing how much of someone’s cumulative lifetime income they kept after taxes and expenses
another way of putting this is that if escobar’s business were legit and it had a stock traded on the NYSE…he’s be richer than bezos.
but because the profits are illegal they can’t be capitalized. escobar couldn’t realize any capital gains.
or another way: cocaine is a bigger business than amazon in terms of profits. so if you’re the CEO of cocaine inc., you’re richer than bezos.
same with capone and alcohol. people spend a lot more on alcohol than they do on amazon, and unlike amazon, alcohol has much larger margins…when it’s illegal.
Your assets are only worth as much as you can sell them for & illegal assets are hard to sell
Ridiculous to think that large institutions aren’t running the world. And there’s no one person running it either. All actions are taken to maximize shareholder profits. To agree with Pill and think that large swaths of powerful people all over the globe would succumb to the persuasion of a select minority who control the world is ridiculous. Mikey is the only one who has any sensibility on this blog.
This isn’t private information in any way, shape or form. Everyone knows big institutions run the world, there are countless documentaries on the topic.
Connect the dots….politicians are lobbyists for various institutions they deem lucrative and favorable. Not only is this proof that institutions like Big Pharma and McDonald’s and various other conglomerates are behind everything, but it solidifies the fact that no one can take any action against it either.
It seems that only a meme can kill another meme. The same evolutionary forces apply to memes as genes. If you had a random meme generator with a large enough sample size, an idea will produce that has the ability to kill even the most powerful memes. Essentially a meme virus that infects other memes and not people.
Memes can be like genes, in that they are code for something. Genes create phenotypes, just like memes create Archetypes. Archetypes are just memes put together and layered on top of one another to create an overarching belief, archetype, or dogma. This is where paragons come from, the perfection of Truth itself. Or in other words, like Pumpkinhead has mentioned, they create Perfect Forms, in conjunction with Plato’s thoughts and ideas.
Archetypes and dogmas. Two things that memes can create.
I do agree that some memes are powerful enough to kill another meme, just like one gene can replace another gene. Memes that are in direct contradiction of one another will create chaos. Actually, chaos is just a derivative of the conflict between one meme and another meme, in a metaphysical sense. They can’t coexist, so one rapidly eats the other one alive or causes friction which generates energy, which turns into chaos.
Feel free to correct me if you have any issues with what I just said. I’m not well-versed in the memetic arts.
lind dinh and michael jones say that mongolian messianism motivates identity politics, and the idea that mongolians are chosen motivates ethnic nepotism and power seeking.
probably, but…
the 100% lack of beauty as a category in the reilgious civilization of mongolianism is 100% obvious. this is very different from the greeks, for whom, as a short englishman said:
beauty is truth, truth beauty. that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.
“when exposing a crime is illegal, you’re ruled by criminals.”
Pumpkin, if you solve a moderately difficult multiplication arithmetic problem correctly, will you most likely score the moderately difficult division problem which is technically easier than that particular multiplication problem?
Ripley’s Believe It or Not…
both the interviewer and interviewee are mongolians/somalis/chadians/etc.
Well I don’t just want to keep mentioning danish people. Theres something I haven’t really worked out and that is why they got rid of Nixon and what happened to the gentile elites once the jewish ones started rising up in the 50s.
You have to remember back in the 1950s, seeing people as part of gangs or ethnic groups were common. There is no way the elite back then didn’t see the rise of our high IQ chosen ones.
Basically if David Rockefeller was still alive I would love to ask him that question.
By the way I haven’t even mentioned what Snowden revealed was going on in the NSA and that multibillion complex they have in nevada to house the world’s best supercomputer…..to……’help run the country’ as CNN would say.
assange should be the first foreigner awarded the medal of honor.
and snowden should be awarded the congressional medal of annoying autists.
Snowden is a limited hangout.
notice tiger woods’s tri-racial chillens look like abos?
Pizzagate is 100% obvious to me. Look at that womans paintings of what they did to her. I can’t remember her name. But she made some of the art that was hung on the walls of the pizza place. She has multiple personalities to repress it.
The term ‘conspiracy theory’ was literally invented by Allen Dulles. It featured in his report as chair of the Warren Commission into the assasination he was ordered to do of JFK. 99.999999% don’t have any idea where the term comes from because if they did, they wouldn’t be cows anymore.
Pumpkin person I interested on your thoughts on the accuracy of this test.
sacft.tripod.com
Please respond!
Pumpkin, if you do the similarities test 5-6 times, and you increase you score from 10-13, is that most likely genuine intellect? Especially if you got a 13 on another similarities test on the first attempt?
Pumpkin, what’s your next article going to be about.
Pumpkin, say you take three different similarities tests with completely different items, and get scores 15,13,12 respectively, but you take the 13 score and the 12 score test 3-4 more times and you get up to a 15 sub test score. Would you true score most likely be 15 considering the small practice effect and the fluidity of the test?
So if writing samples gives an IQ of 120, and a drawing sample gives an IQ of 131, it’s tempting to average these to an IQ of 126 (top 5%). However it’s much more rare to average in the top 5% on multiple tests than it is to score in the top 5% on any one test. On the WISC-R IQ test for example, people who average in the top 5% on all subtests, score above the top 1% (IQ 137) on the composite score.” Could you link me to somethiing explaning this or explain it yourself, please?
It’s harder to be in the top 5% (on average) of all abilities than it is to be in the top 5% of just one ability, so while 5% are by definition in the top 5% of any one ability, only 1% average in the top 5% of all abilities.
Pumpkin, wouldn’t it be better to use another IQ test besides draw a person, since it only has a .27 correlation, which is a very weak correlation.
Other studies report higher correlations. By itself it’s useless but if you combine it with other tests it’s useful.
Pumpkin, would most people on the similarities test who can formulate the proper concept also verbally express that same concept?
I am quite interested by the claim of eminent people who are sexual deviants having IQs up to 10 points lower than their non-deviant counterparts. Could you give a source? It brings to my mind a few highly intelligent “deviants” including Michel Foucault, although I realise that their existence doesn’t preclude the truth of that statement.
I second this question. What is the source for this statement?
Sexual deviants have lower IQ than control groups:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17634757/
Although it could be like left-handedness which correlates with both very low & very high IQ.
Pumpkin, would Hispanics of higher SES and English as a second language learnt in school; would they still have underestimate verbal IQs, even though their PIQ VIQ discrepancy is very low? What about monolingual white Americans, what’s the PIQ VIQ discrepancy between them?
Pingback: Porn vs. Sex Magik | CENSORED.TODAY
Pingback: Porn vs. Sex Magik