It’s common knowledge in psychometrics that U.S. whites average about one standard deviation (15 IQ points) higher than U.S. blacks and have done so since the first mass tests were administered in WWI.
But could the gap extend much further in space and time? Tens of thousands of years further.
At first it sounds absurd: there were no IQ tests 15,000 years ago, and there weren’t any white people. The earliest Europeans had dark skin, and they were largely replaced by Middle Easterners spreading agriculture.
Nonetheless, there were people living in Europe 15,000 years ago and to the degree they resemble today’s Europeans (phenotypically and genetically) they’re a proxy for archaic whites.
Similarly, the oldest lineage in Africa are Bushmen, and to the degree they resemble modern Africans, they’re a proxy for archaic blacks.
The archaic whites left the following rock art over 15,000 years ago.
The archaic blacks left the following rock art, perhaps much more recently.
When I asked readers to rate the two archaic white paintings using the quality scale of the Dale-Harris Draw-A-Man test, the median votes were 3 and 11, giving the archaic whites a mean score of 7.
For archaic blacks, the median votes were 3 and 8, giving archaic blacks a mean score of 5.5.
That’s a difference of 1.5 points. Since the standard deviation for incipient adults (age 15) on the Goodenough-Harris quality scale is 1.7, archaic whites over 15 thousand years ago were already nearly one standard deviation (15 IQ points) higher than archaic blacks living later.
Of course with such a tiny sample size, this conclusion is EXTREMELY tentative and requires far more research.
Pumpkin Person 
only black women care peepee.
the more interesting question is why did sean connery become MORE sexy with age?
connery was a really bad bodybuilder…he had spaghetti arms.
but the reverse of brando he became sexier and sexier with age.
how is that possible in the HBD weltanscauung?
HOW DO PROFESSORS SHOE AND COCKRING EXPLAIN SEAN CONNERY’S SEXINESS?
THIS IS THE QUESTION!
Comments like these give me joy… Involuntary smiles and the body getting tense.
I’m assuming most of your readers are whites. Would they not have an evolutionary disposition to liking white paintings? LOL
I’m not sure how many of them knew the race of the artist. In any event, they were instructed to follow the scoring rules. Most of the actual psychologists who administered this test to U.S. kids of all races were white too
I don’t see how getting a pittance of a “sample size” on your blog about how well something is drawn leads you to draw the conclusions you did.
The test is normally scored by ONE person, since all they have to do is look at the panel. One person is enough since any two raters agree with a 0.85 correlation. The fact that I took the average of about a dozen raters makes it far more reliable then the test as normally given.
The problem is not that I didn’t have enough raters, the problem is I only compared two drawings from each race, but then upper paleolithic paintings of people are few and far between.
Get a million votes, still no way for you to draw the conclusion you did. Comparing drawings, in any case, and having readers of an HBD blog being the voters already biases the sample. Nevermind the fact that, again, the “conclusion” will remain speculative.
Okay, so if I get a bunch of black people to rate the pictures and arrive at the same conclusion, will you admit you’re wrong?
I still don’t see how your conclusion would follow.
What part do you not understand? Draw-a-man is an IQ test that’s been existence since 1926. I’m simply applying it to the people who drew ancient rock art.
How’s that evidence that your conclusion follows?
how is it not?
Your conclusion is, from these small sized polls based on rock art and your skewed readership poll, that the b-w IQ gap has existed for 15000 years, no? If I’m in error I will admit it.
I stated in the article that it’s a tentative conclusion. I don’t have the time right now to do a really accurate study so i just did a preliminary analysis. Only if it’s replicated with far more drawings and with a different set of raters will the hypothesis be confirmed.
How would the conclusion follow? How would the hypothesis be confirmed? How do you know who is answering the questions?
you obviously don’t understand what a hypothesis is.
Datum: poll on rock art
Hypothesis:?
how can you not know what the hypothesis is? how is that even possible?
Just answer. I’m making this easy.
Datum: poll
Hypothesis: the answers from the poll would average to 15 point gap, no?
If so, how does it follow that that’s really the case based on a small sample? How do you know that you’re identifying a ’15 point IQ gap?’
Just storytelling.
for god’s sake i just told you. it needs to be replicated with a larger sample. what part of “EXTREMELY tentative” do you not understand? i stated that right in the article.
Datum: ?
Hypothesis: ?
With a larger sample, how would the conclusion of your hypothesis follow?
hypothesis: ancient european cave art will outscore ancient sub-saharan african rock art on the DAM IQ test
data: sample of ancient rock art to be scored
How big of a sample would you need to heighten the probability of your hypothesis being true? Using a sample of individuals from X, in virtue of what would that raise the probability of the hypothesis being true? How big of a sample would you need?
How big a sample would I need to achieve statistical significance is what you’re trying to ask. That depends on the variability of the data and the level of statistical significance I want to achieve.
You need to educate yourself.
Seriously.
Real education, not liberal propaganda.
“liberal propaganda”?
I just want you to answer the question. How would asking random people what they think about X have any bearing on “IQ” 15kya?
The test is scored by having examiners judge the picture according to a scale of quality they can compare it to. I simply applied the rules of the test to ancient drawings & found the familiar 15 point BW gap. You can argue the results are meaningless when applied to people who lived so long ago, but i just found it interesting that the same 15 point gap emerged. Maybe it’s just a fluke that will disappear with more data.
I see the logic. I just think it’s too flawed to take seriously and it’s full of confirmation bias. Nevermind the huge bias on only readers of your blog who, presumably, have an idea of where the rock art was found.
I see your point. One would need to have several culturally diverse judges score the drawings & only if there was a high interrater correlation could one claim it’s objective.
Why i laugh hard when PP loses hx patience with RR** Just because i’m idiot* Or gay*
PP, do you know what confirmation bias is?
“Why i laugh hard when PP loses hx patience with RR** Just because i’m idiot* Or gay*”
Probably because you’re gay*
it’s possible confirmation bias swayed a few readers (those who may have been able to recognize some of the drawings as african). Actually theres’s a whole literature on whether the race of the examiners affects the BW IQ gap.
peepee neglects another OBVIOUS fact.
the fine arts of ancient greece were superior to those of ancient china.
literature, sculpture, architecture, etc. all OBVIOUSLY superior in terms of the skill/techne required.
RR
The general rule of thumb with art is that the cleaner the lines, the more dextrous, complex, meaningful and true to life the drawing is, the better. If anyone uses any other metric to judge drawings/art that isn’t a pretentious post modernist artsy fartsy type, then they are probably a moron. In other words our sense of good art is very likely universal. It is a measure of the skill, creativity and appeal to the senses that we think it takes to produce a particular piece.
I certainly see the connection PP is trying to draw here(pardon the pun), it makes sense though I would say it should be looked at as an anecdotally fun exercise that reaches a conclusion that surprisingly matches current results. Perhaps a better exercise would be to sum up cultural artefacts from a broad array of things to reach a more definitive conclusion(tool making, language, social organization, rituals etc).
In any case I will agree with you on one thing, perhaps many more drawings need to be compared in order to make this a statistically robust finding. Perhaps drawings from the same period too.
you don’t have to be a fag to know that the greatest news stories of the last 40 years are:
1. AIDS
2. the fall of the soviet union
3. computer crap
Please list the 10 most important things to happen in the last FIFTY year. My 2019 influential list is due soon.
Just-so stories.
And stop using those “facial reconstructions.”
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2018/02/06/dont-fall-for-facial-reconstructions/
These results suggest that facial approximations are not very useful in excluding individuals to whom skeletal remains may not belong.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11965323_Building_Faces_from_Dry_Skulls_Are_They_Recognized_Above_Chance_Rates
(1) We cannot predict soft tissue from fossils; (2) “reconstruction” implies “exactness”, which we all know is false; (3) facial “reconstructions” are art, not science; (4) “successes” from facial “reconstructions” are independent of the “reconstructions” in question, and so that’s not evidence that they are “right”, or “close enough”, either.
And the money quote:
Attempts based on modem ape morphologies (and variabilities) are likely to be heavily biased, grossly inaccurate, and invalid because the hard to soft tissue relationships of modem apes are unlikely to be the same as hominid ancestors due to changes arising from secular trends and evolutionary forces [4]. Hence any facial “reconstructions” of earlier hominids are likely to be misleading [4].
http://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/s1355-0306(03)71776-6
And there was something recent which called into question that specific “reconstruction”, too.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161867-ancient-dark-skinned-briton-cheddar-man-find-may-not-be-true/
The sample, in any case, was contaminated:
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1002/bies.20837
you’re not even trying.
bill laimbeer vs tommy desimone = bill laimbeer is dead…but so is tommy.
…lord, thou hast seduced me, and I was seduced…
Science isn’t exact.
So what? That doesn’t refute the conceptual/empirical objections against “reconstructions.”
You’re right it don’t. I was the first to bring up this issue with pumpkin. However, that doesn’t make it pseudoscientific.
as everyone knows…
boston is the most racist big city in america…
laimbeer was a rich kid born in boston. height is so important for men. my boss at anthem was a 6’3″ chinese guy. he joked that someone had been promoted because he was only guy shorter than the (jewish) CEO. but the CEO of my next insurance company was a gentile and a giant. like 6’8″.
The younger Laimbeer once famously joked, “I’m the only player in the NBA who makes less money than his father.”[4]
that’s from hearsay…maybe…
one of my high schRool teachers told me about boston racism…
and that half askenazi girl at anthem in la told me…
(she was a soviet immigrant who settled in an NH boston suburb)…
…
i couldn’t believe how RACIST she sounded against chinks.
it was ridiculous!
(so jews hate chinks!)
and it wasn’t just her.
after i left the whole corporate actuarial department was divided along RACIAL lines.
YUCK!
the head guy was a gentile from NH.
live free or die.
Is the 15 point black-white IQ gap over 15 thousand years old?
bill laimbeer says…NO!
peepee should stop obsessing about any supposed “gap” and instead obsess about being a smart person.
taleb is so right it’s sad!
IQ has been promoted way TOO MUCH.
just like a degree from harvard has been promoted way TOO MUCH.
so LAME!
IQ is BORING and STUPID.
you wouldn’t wanna join them…
that would be DUMB!
I like taleb
harvard’s just a gatekeeper
Died: April 15, 1912, Atlantic Ocean
my family is a yuge stinking pile of shit…like most families.
whatever info i have claimed about my family and me is just meant as counter-example to HBD.
Genome ready.
Thank you for your interest in research into the genetics of intelligence. Though the project for which you’ve volunteered has been significantly delayed by obstacles to sequencing every volunteer for our study – obstacles which are not yet entirely behind us! – we’re pleased to announce that your genome is among the lucky ones, and now available for download at your convenience.
nice that peepee allowed the petrosian fedora hasid.
the PREVAILING theory of human vs computer chess is…
1. it’s over. forever. no human has a chance.
2. petrosian might have a chance.
1 = 99.999999%
2 = HOPE
yeah.
if capi were resurrected alpha-zero would have a problem.
if there were some capi-petrosian hybrid human…
alpha-zero would have a BIGGER problem…
the human would win VERY SLOWLY.
in the END GAME.
because there is one chess player who was super-human. a genius. a freak.
jose rafael capablanca
everyone agrees on this point.
FREAK!
capi was SO great that i thought his middle name was “rafael”.
i confused “jorge RAFAEL videla” vs “jose RAUL capablanca”.
SAD!
ALL MEXICAN NAMES SOUND ALIKE.
THIS IS SAD!
”smart people SOUND crazy”
Just you..
That face don’t look ”african” at all, a lot of ”white” [european] people have this features… Just the skin…
It is supposed to be english hunter gatherer thx to ancient dna reconstitution. European are a mixture of early Hunter-gatherer, Levantine farmers and metal age invaders.Alsmot all malculine lines were replaced by metal age invaders even if there DNA is only around 15% of the total. Farmer is around 30% to 90%. Hunter gatherer is more prevalent north.
Métal age invaders are themselves a mixture of East hunter gatherer and Iranian farmers.So white people comes from a mixture of 4 very different ethnic groups.Reich writes they were as different as present races (I doubt it though).
They may have been 4 different clads but that doesn’t necessarily make them 4 different races, unless you assume races must be monophyletic which I reject. Reich is a cladist and has yet to display a grasp of evolutionary taxonomy. That’s what happens when you spend all your time studying genetics and ignore paleontology.
Well, i thought drawning is about spatial skills and blacks precociously evolved to be more social [leaning verbal skills, smartest blacks tend to lean verbal intelligence] than build-things because intertropical regions select for short term survive. ”Blacks” are only one among macro-racial groups who never expanded their niches or migrated to temperated places. My lazy analysis [and fixed until now].
Attempting to deduce the IQ of ancient population that probably bare little to no resemblance to the modern day populations inhabiting the same region, by way of having your deeply biased readers rate cherry picked cave paintings drawn by said populations..
My God, you cultists are willing to go to any length to prove your eternal racial superiority.
The pictures weren’t cherry picked. In fact those are the only 2 crogmagnon drawings of humans i’ve ever been able to find, so there was nothing to cherry pick from. And the bushman drawings were picked randomly. As for biased readers, i didn’t tell them where the pictures were from though some may been able to tell in some cases.
Using the Bushmen as a proxy for archaic African is tenuous at best, dishonest at worst.
SSA is genetically heterogeneous but phenotypically homogenous unlike Europe.
You are comparing Apples to fucking oranges here.
It’s quite pitiful.
Once again Afro has to pick a new username to spout his idiot views all over this blog.
Don’t think Afro would say “fucking oranges”. That sounds like something an angry young white male lefty hipster who hates Jeff Bezos would say; the kind who is so politically correct they could snap and turn into a Trump supporter any day. Strong feelings are easily flipped.
”That sounds like something an angry young white male lefty hipster who hates Jeff Bezos would say; the kind who is so politically correct they could snap and turn into a Trump supporter any day. Strong feelings are easily flipped.”
Just super stupid people who change the side from the extreme to another, and stupid one, only if the another side was considerably -more- morally correct.
PP can’t differentiate virtue from politically correct…
it’s interesting how the (((media))) has made genuine racism and genuine hitlerism like hanford, a nuclear waste dump.
that is, in the “mental landscape” the nuclear waste itself is vanishingly small, but any who come within a certain radius of it are labeled “racists” and “nazis”.
Why do you think Chomsky sticks to Wikipedia talking points when it comes to Nazism? Genuine belief, or self-preservation? Or, as PP suggests, ethnic interests?
the kardashians are white people, just like most south asians, by the standard of historical linguistics….the nazi standard.
armenian is an indo-european language.
the face of the resistance…to chess engines…is short and swart.
the indians were the equal of the greeks in philosophy.
this is undeniable.
mccabe sounds super gay…but apparently isn’t.
You sound super gay and you’re..
from a RACIAL perspective iran and what was the RAJ should be allies of the US.
and allies against the rise of china.
and despite the “baljit” trope…south asians are…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorary_whites
in the US.
And no we are not honorary whites, we are indians. Some people from the extreme north west and north of india can look like southern euro whites,but thats it.
And there was no such thing as an aryan race or aryan ethnicity. Arya word was originally invented by a priestly class of a common ancestor religion of the vedic and zorastrian religions, to differentiate themselves from their fellow priests who didnt perform certain rituals the mainstream way.
Having said that, i have to add hinduism itself is more dravidian than it is from the above religion.
baljeets ARE effeminate.
this is why they can’t beat australia at cricket.
THE great south asian afalete is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahangir_Khan
You follow cricket?, thats interesting.
Indians are not athletic. Plus all that spicy food over decades maybe screwing up their testosterone. Plus ejaculating… more frequently or even less frequently, over decades amidst frequent infectious illnesses or having to visit the bathroom frequently, takes a toll.
Yet indians who have married and have settled in other countries outside india, call the shots over their wives in most marriages. Wives often resort to other means to keep them in control or call the shots. I will post the related newspaper link as soon as i find it.
And australia is one the greatest sporting powers in the world. Not just in cricket but in many sports. They surf since a young age, plus they take up one sport or another as as serious hobby since childhood.
Plus indians sometimes get wrong sporting advice from australian coaches. They had a couple of them as coaches.
I dont think he watches any sport, just knows from general knowledge
As far as I’m aware, vegetarian diets also decrease testosterone.
Try to explain me… I’m mostly vegetarian since 2014 and recently i take another test test, and i scored higher on both…
Still and ever on the pre-school of ”correlation =/= causation”. Just ONE vegetarian man with higher testosterone or without decreasing on your testosterone after long-time on vegetarian diet, threat your reasoning line.
Try this
Men who are more empathetic, i mean, less RETARDED, but still in some and different way, retarded, specially without rationality in good shape, are also more likely to become vegetarian or vegan…
So, you probably take a study showing a correlation between testosterone levels and males with different ”dietstyles” and conclude that it’s an evidence of causality. You became a genuine leftist scientist, those who, seems, mostly definitely don’t understand this basic differences about scientific method.
Finally finished writing and editing my book its 100 pages. The title is the Book of the Truth.
Congrats!
https://phys.org/news/2010-03-cro-magnon-skull-brains-shrunk.html
Seems that “whites” were really smart back in the day.
i have some thoughts on that here:
https://pumpkinperson.com/2018/09/02/have-we-recovered-our-paleolithic-brain-size-yet/
Dairy products have more choline that helps in neuronal growth. So its likely that agrarian people had more efficient brains than hunter gatherers of that time.
PP you said a few days back that visio spatial intelligence takes up more space in the brain, so is it possible that when people started moving away from hunter gather lifestyles to agriculture or pastoralism they needed relatively lesser visiospatial intelligence and that also contributed to reduction in brain size?
Plus the rise of the practice of recording counts of things, after 20,000 b.c? may have contributed?
It’s possible & there’s a bit of evidence that might support that (artic people & some Australian aboriginal groups have high visual memories) but the simplest theory is that brain size decreased (and then rebounded) for the same reason height and life span did: phenotypic plasticity
The malnutrition & disease of agriculture stunted our phenotype and only since the industrial revolution have we recovered our genetic potential.
“you said a few days back that visio spatial intelligence takes up more space in the brain”
What does this mean?
“when people started moving away from hunter gather lifestyles to agriculture or pastoralism they needed relatively lesser visiospatial intelligence and that also contributed to reduction in brain size”
Just-so stories
” “when people started moving away from hunter gather lifestyles to agriculture or pastoralism they needed relatively lesser visiospatial intelligence and that also contributed to reduction in brain size”
Just-so stories”
So what your thought about it*
This blog exemplify why ”humanity” don’t deserve to be continued…
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/912422544771125829/E9AF7A6DC204C80FB59D3B7B8EF26221CD92F19D/
So what other “IQ gaps” are as “ancient” as the black-white IQ gap?
Religious[ mythological] people must be treated as lovely down syndrome people, as mentally deficient, what they truly are…
Religion is one of the ultimate just-so stories—all of them, including evolutionary “explanations” for why they are so widespread.
I believe in god but i dont believe in religion. But i believe that religion has its purpose. Not all of it though. Bad parts in various religions should be removed, but not religion as a whole. It still serves its purpose. I believe in evolution but i dont reject entire religion or religions that dont agree with it, just because of that one point. If you me santo or anybody else do that it will be like us throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
God doesn’t exist.
Religion is basically specism or antrophrocentism… All nonhuman living beings believe they are the center o universe, thus, human borgs.
The world mythology [”studies” on humans myths] sound more honest than metaphorically-charged religion [connect to divine]
^^^ I agree with this.
God is not a person. God means the driving force of the universe/multiverse.The main bio-physical-chemical reaction driving the universe/multiverse. I always believed this is what god is. That said, i doubt i am the first person who thought this. God may not be having a human like form at all. And santo, while some religions give god a human form not all religions do. And the miracles in religion were for mass consumption. As people were illiterate at that time if religions had said god is a bio-physical-chemical force they wouldnt understand. Because they wouldnt have known what those forces were to begin with. But tell them that god is someone who does miracles or magic then they would get what god is. All religions did this.
So you’re not religious…
”god” is the factor g of reality, BUT, the only fundamental factor of our reality is the balance or stability… it’s what all religions is, at priori, based on. The problem about religion condenation, for example, about homossexual behavior, is not because homossexuality is an expression of umbalance at some extent, a disorder [not all disorders are in the same level of umbalance], because it’s true. The problem is: absolute condenation and or lack of tolerance of this behavior; absolute emphasis on MATERIAL KNOWLEDGE and not in EXISTENTIAL KNOWLEDGE.
One of the great argument against vile absolute condenation of individuals who have diverse sexual identity namely in western societies, is the existentialism, and it’s true.
Why condemn people to behave in such way, at priori, not criminal or malevolent one if everyone is the same, essentially speaking [individuals and lives, the two first identities], everyone will die some day and the only absolute perfection is what doens’t exist*
How can you be a dualist and an athiest? Not to say that they are inherently mutually exclusive but it does add more confusion. So you think consciousness is just what? Ectoplasmic goo?
“Only people who believe in God are dualists.”
I actually made it abundantly clear that that was not my point. Jesus dude, reading comprehension.
It’s literally the first sentence. You can be a dualist and an atheist, it just makes less sense lol.
I’m part of a rare breed, then, that isn’t a physicalist but is an atheist. I don’t see the big deal.
“I’m part of a rare breed,”
Yeah I guess that’s a word for it.
It’s just funny, but you know what’s even funnier than someone who is a dualist and an atheist? Someone who’s a dualist and a moral realist, hahaha.
santo, can you rephrase both your replies?
Among people who are religious very few focus on the miracles done by the gods , messiahs, prophets of those religions but more on their message.
Plus throughout history more people were fully illiterate and lacked scientific knowledge so religion was necessary to provide answers to them. Say somebody died of cancer. In the modern era people know what cancer means and would have the knowledge that it is caused by viruses that affects some people randomly or due to lifestyle. This knowledge to some extent softens the blow to the loved ones of the person affected by the cancer. But in olden times, if somebody had cancer people didnt know what and how it happened and if the person who had got it, got progressively sick they would turn to religion for answers or solace.
Same situation with floods or natural disasters etc
Religion is a primitive philosophy who became extremely profitable among all suckers in this miserable human world.
People need FAITH not religion.
If you read my earlier comment again you will get that religion gave people faith.
Also in ancient times religions promoted hygiene, health, love for animals, love for other people, temperence and moderation like islam banning alcohol consumption, sikhism banning tobacco consumption, and buddhism advocating the middle path in doing various things in life etc. Religions also scared people that if they do bad things they will go to hell etc. For most of human beings throughout history as they were illiterate all this was necessary.
But like all things religion can be exploited too. And like i said bad parts exist in various religions too. Personally i think stuff like the concept of jihad in islam, or holy wars concept which although didnt exist in the bible some people advocated it and muslim preachers advocating to convert or kill idol worshippers, and some religions saying that other people are inferior. Like casteism in hinduisim too. And anti-abortion stuff in some religions or stuff like earth is flat in some religions, should be removed.
”love for ‘animals”
HUAHUAHAUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUAHUA
nume, the SIMPLEST FACT that religion is not based on FACTS, it’s already absolutely condemnable…
You, subconsciously know, that believe in ”god” is basically the same to believe in greek pantheon or in santa kkklaus..
EXPLAIN ME WHAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MYTHOLOGY AND A RELIGION… no have any.
Religion is a FAKE PHILOSOPHY, EVER…
Religion or religious people say they follows WISDOM… but how ”love or search for every knowledge” can be the same to ”believe in personally convenient lies”**
Faith is not the same than religion. Everyone, less a chronic suicidal have a faith, believe in something, the act itself is a belief, that this matter…
Religion IS art and art IS a human entertainment to escape from direct contact with a integral time.
Anxious and depressed people tend to be in direct contact with this real time. Art is, at priori, a distraction, a UNKNOWLEDGE of reality of time, very efficient to make us sane or not pre-depressed or anxious.
BUT… humans MUST accept the elimination of any religion in the future, unfortunately not now and embrace the REAL wisdom, philosophy.
On a different note… i have been thinking. In one of the articles professor hsu said it may be possible to create 1000IQ people and you said it may not be possible as the heads of the people who are chosen for it will find their heads explode. I agree with it. But i think it is possible to create people with upto 300 IQ.
Take the people with the largest heads who have the highest IQs among their group and take the people withe smallest heads who have the highest IQs among their group and combine their genes? Possibly eight people have reportedly reached 200 IQs or more in the modern era :tao, hirata, kim jong un, phillip bauman, kearney , sidis, de mello, savant. So it may be possible that 300 IQ people can be created.
But the articles that talked about people having 200 IQs are skeptical that somebody can actually have IQs above 200 with sd15. What do you think? Can you do an article about this point?
Damn, Name is my favorite commenter here. Step your game up, niggaz.
Stop trying to convince people mumble rap isn’t real rap. It most certainly is. I listen to it everyday and my mind has both rotted and resurfaced.
PP, not trying to come off as complaining, but some replies to my comments didnt show up in the last two days, for me.
I see seven of your comments showing up from the 24th to now.