It seems Donald Trump’s base is largely composed of two largely opposing groups: the pro-Israel far-right and the anti-Semitic alt-right, with each side hoping Trump was playing the other and secretly being on their side. Below is a video of Trump responding to an anti-Israel question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9PRCIdJ_v4
But with Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, we’ve seen the clearest test yet of where Trump actually stands. A friend was in America’s most pro-Israel city, New York, when Trump made his announcement and was worried about all the traffic jams from people going out to bars to celebrate. He felt he needed to get back to his hotel room immediately because the city was about to go into a state of euphoria.
Donald Trump–keeper of promises gushed the normally anti-trump CNN.
Hard-core New Yorker Lion of the Blogosphere was deliriously happy, gushing:
This is the most pro-Israel thing that any U.S. President has ever done. Only Trump could have done this. Any other president would be too afraid of the State Department establishment, too afraid of the changing the status quo to do what’s right.
What have the Palestinians ever done to merit NOT moving the embassy to Jerusalem? Absolutely nothing.
Does Lion honestly believe America’s elite (including the state department) is not pro-Israel? In the comment section he writes:
Prole white gentiles love Israel a lot more than self-hating Jewish liberal elites.
Lion is claiming America’s foreign policy is pro-Israel in spite of its Jewish elite, not because of it. I don’t know if Lion actually believes this, but elite media always claims the U.S. is pro-Israel because of Christian evangelicals, and not because of Jewish influence. I doubt America’s liberal Jewish elite is anywhere near as self-hating as Lion claims, though that doesn’t necessarily mean they all support Israel, or think Trump’s move is good for Israel if they do.
But I do agree with Lion that a lot of gentile proles love Israel, and I think this is part of the negative correlation between IQ and conservatism (which I define as supporting the power structure).
Within each race, lower IQ people tend to oppose the underdogs (blacks, gays, Hispanics, women, Palestinians, the poor, wild life) while high IQ people tend to oppose the powerful (men, Jews, Israel, the U.S. military, the U.S. president, bankers, billionaires, oil companies), which is ironic given that high IQ people are far more likely to be powerful themselves, but since Jews tend to have high IQs despite being pro-Israel on average, those Jews who are critical of Israel will tend to have freakishly high IQs (Chomsky) because the combination of belonging to two high IQ groups (Jewish and anti-Israel) with so little overlap is so rare.
By contrast Arabs tend to score low on IQ tests despite being anti-Israel, so a fanatically pro-Israel Palestinian would probably score freakishly low on a culture reduced IQ test because the odds of belonging to two almost mutually exclusive low IQ groups is so rare. We see a similar phenomenon with black conservatives in the U.S.
Meanwhile over at Steve Sailer’s blog, opinions on Trump’s Jerusalem move were mixed, but generally more cynical than at Lion’s blog.
Commenter Thomas wrote:
I can’t help but think this maneuver is driven at least in part by the special counsel probe. Trump had this in the desk drawer since the campaign, and with Flynn’s recent legal trouble arising from a back-channel diplomatic effort to help Israel out at the UN (while Obama threw them under the bus), Trump probably wants to fly the “Friend of Israel” flag high and proud right now.
Commenter syonredux wrote sarcastically:
…Frankly, people don’t understand just how much Trump hates the Jews…..I mean, would Hitler have forced his (hypothetical) daughter to convert to Judaism and marry a Jew? No, Hitler would never have gone that far in order to gull the Jews….but Trump did…Talk about a will of iron….
Commenter lavoisier said:
…This just shows the world that Donald Trump is Israel’s bitch. This is fine if the label only applied to him, but unfortunately it now applies to all Americans, even those like myself who are disgusted by this decision and do not support our unholy alliance with Israel.
Commenter International Jew said:
Trump recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital reminds me of the outrage he caused on (I think) his first day in office, when he took a phone call from the president of Taiwan. Which he wasn’t supposed to do, because the red Chinese don’t want us to.
In both cases, Trump’s gesture amounted to a FU directed “to whom it may concern”. Which, within reason, is a good policy inasmuch as it sends two signals: (1) that he lives in the world of the real, not the make-believe, and (2) that he’s nobody’s bitch. (Letting others dictate who you talk to, and what words you may use, qualifies you as their bitch, par excellence.)…
The most terrifying comment of all came from Brabantian who wrote:
Unz’s own Israel Shamir, hints at an opposite ‘anti-Semitic’ interpretation of this Trump move … as a very clever anti-Israeli & anti-Jewish-lobby wrecking ball, using Israel’s own over-reaching desires to ruin it, as a couple of commenters above also suggest.
On this view, Trump’s gambit with Israel is to pretend to give them what they want, Jerusalem as the capital, annexing more of the West Bank etc … Jewish over-reach will provoke such a huuge reaction, that the world community will more quickly move to declare racial-law Israel an apartheid state, and isolate it as a pariah, so that even in the USA Jewish influence will implode, to Trump’s secret pleasure.
This argument is that Trump, precisely because he has always had to adapt to a Jewish mentality, having spent his entire career amidst it, from his earliest days with Meyer Lansky’s friend Roy Cohn, is quite weary of Jewish power and wishes to bring Jewish influence to heel.
A related idea is that Trump is shaking the table in order to let the mid-east dominoes fall into conflict, Israel with its neighbours & the various Muslim factions & communities against each other, ultimately buttressing his anti-immigration, ring-fence-the-Anglo-culture positioning, as the world watches mid-East nations fire up deadly major conflict out of what increasingly seems to be their inner nature.
The theory is that Trump is lighting up the mid-East on purpose, as the best tool he has to demolish both Jewish influence, and the Islamist-fellow-traveller fake progressives in the West.
Pumpkin Person 
King David made Jerusalem the capital of Israel 3,020 years ago.
i don’t understand why the palestinians care.
east berlin was the capital of east germany. west berlin was west germany’s de jure capital.
and the dome of the rock and jerusalem are a lot less important to muslims than jerusalem is to jews.
that is, a two state solution can include a division of jerusalem. jerusalem can be the capital of both countries.
of course in time there will be a one state solution, and the jews will leave. in recent years more jews are leaving israel than moving to israel.
and no one has ever explained to me if those 800,000 refugees were evicted or left. the idea that they left voluntarily sounds not believable. it sounds like ethnic cleansing.
as zizek remarked on breivik, there are anti-semitic zionists.
i’m one. i’d much prefer all jews move to israel and then they’d so outnumber the arabs they could have a one state solution and keep their power.
and i do not want the 6m jews living in israel today to move to the US or europe. i want them to stay where they are.
sorry. by “arab” i mean palestinian. i realize jews do not make this distinction. all arabs are the same as far as they’re concerned. when all they really have in common is language and religion. and hatred of israel.
The one state solution means either arpatheid or positive discrimination. No branch of the alternative gives an happy end for the cleverest group. Some àrabs I heard on msnbc in Gaza are now beginning to claim civil rights instead of political ones . However , in the two states solution , they were never talks of deporting Arabs . Israeli should have given big territorial concessions for a total separation from the Arabs , Muslim and Christian , giving both a state .
My theory is that he simply sees the jerusalem card as a chip to win favour with the israeli hard right so that theyll tell their american cousins to back off on his domestic agenda.
The theory in trumps head of course is that the Israeli jews and american jews are seperate groups and I don’t know if there is much evidence for this. I have seen stories of secret tape recordings of Netanyhau telling Eastern European leaders to stand up to the EU versus open borders. Apparently Netanyahu and Trump get on well personally.
Trumps social ingenuity is very good. I trust he knows what hes doing.
I’ve related before how there is a lot of biographical and psychological circumstantial evidence which makes me pretty convinced trump is much closer to the alt right than cukservative israel clowns in his desires. And of course, the jews themselves know this tapping his phones and confidantes phones hence their reaction to him on the campaign trail and in office.
The last thing Trump wants is now to be shaken down by them. If every time the American faction indicts someone or has a judge issue an order to release illegals, Trump really shouldnt be throwing more tires into the fire by giving the israeli jews more and more.
The comment above mentioning this was a tit for tat to dig out Flynn makes me realise that wwhen negotiating with psychopaths you are always at a disadvantage because the premium you have on hostages is a lot more than any hostages you can take. Hostages taken from their side are always expendable.
This is why the merchant mind evolves towards psychopathy – because you need to lighten the load in negotiations.
Philosopher: “This is why the merchant mind evolves towards psychopathy – because you need to lighten the load in negotiations.”
This makes sense.
You did not make sense before.
There was no reason to take you seriously.
But on clannishness, I do not see how you can conflate it with psychopathy when all cognitive traits lie on a spectrum. One half would necessarily be above the other half in empathy traits.
(I had pictures on my walls in 2009, but then I moved out of my mom’s house and got depressed because life was meaningless, it’s been meaningless a long time)
Life is meaningless. I don’t wanna be a lawyer but I heard lawyers get laid a lot, so that’s something to look forward to.
Trumps social ingenuity is very good. I trust he knows what hes doing.
Maybe you overestimated him.
Something also you may not have considered philosopher is that Gentile merchants would be under the same selection pressures as Jewish merchants. And both would be in competition with each other. Even to this day competition for elite status is not one sided where one is in total control. Why should elite Gentiles care about the masses other than as drones in the economic system? The claim that the media is Jewish would only bolster the facts that elite Gentiles find this useful and in their best interests. It is poverty of thought to think only Jews make up all the elite. You cannot dismiss that merchant Gentiles would not seek power the most efficient way possible just as the Jewish merchants would. The Gentile merchants are not on your side philosopher. It would be stupid to think the master is not gentle and it is stupid to say elite gentiles are brainwashed. They are master and master finds Jews useful. You philosopher calm master is bad but then ignore that master is a bunch of elite Gentiles. You are blind to it and only think of the Jews. You ignore the selection pressures on your own ethnic group that breads masters at to and drones at the bottom. You do not realize how Machiavellian elite white gentiles are. I told you before that you miss half the picture. You think all gentiles are gullible serfs with elite jews at the top. Why can’t you admit to the reality of an elite Gentile class influencing their ethnic culture in negative ways? Not all gentiles are nice people like you think they are philosopher.
elite gentiles do not think of themselves as gentiles to the same extent that elite jews think of themselves as jews.
there is no co-ordination among elite gentiles. not even among those of the same nationality. i guarantee rich irishmen don’t talk about how to keep the jews out of ireland. they used to. they don’t anymore.
a russian jew, a jew from hong kong, a jew from the US, a jew from south africa, a jew from israel, a jew from morocco, etc.
they all have a lot in common, or think they do. they will collude whether they mean it or not. it’s true of the overseas chinese and indians too. the one thing idi amin did that ugandans liked was kick out the indians.
Trumpy is horse trading. But his main affect will be changing the culture of the US away from a suicidal jim jones cult. He is doing that with his culture wars on the NFL, hollywood, media and so on. The ‘silly’ stuff is actually more important than anything he officially does in office in the long run.
Well if trump was israels bitch, he would have invaded Syria and abolsihed the border with Mexico as Jeb Bush was planning.
It stand to reason that because hes found a way not to do these things, the jewish media is obsessed with taking him down.
The refusal by Obama to go after Assad for chemicalweaponshumangenocideXXX really infuriated our wonderful CFR swamp creatures. Cameron put it before parliament no questions asked. I bet australia and france were already half way to syria. The power of the [redacted by pp, dec 10, 2017] is remarkable.
Trumps theory is that the ‘hard right’ Israelis and american new york times/washington post type jews are different groups.
I read the Economist sometimes and Rothschild criticises the hard right Israelis and Israel quite a lot so then they probably are different factions.
An even more subtle interpretation is that trump is driving a wedge between them. But why the CFR jews would not want Israel to be formally made lord of the middle east I don’t know. Its pretty obvious thats what they desire in their foreign policy anyway.
Confusing!
Sometimes, if you are in the dark about something. And you don;’t have all the pieces of the puzzle. You just have to throw your hands up in the air and say – i have no idea what is going on. This is one of those times.
When Obama let the UN censure Israel, there was a lot more info out there to indicate Obama sympathised a lot with the palestinians and largely hated being handled by Forman and Rahm Emmanual. Obama really is naive about politics. He let his daughter intern under Weinstein for example.
I do feel Obama is naive about a lot of things. He’s not the sociopath some make him out to be. But I’m sure Weinstein would be smart enough to restrain himself around the president’ s daughter.
I agree. Obama was not (politically) smart enough to use his power to advance black interests. Nobody’s smarter at advancing their political interests than Jews.
Trumps theory is that the ‘hard right’ Israelis and american new york times/washington post type jews are different groups.
It’s a continuum, but the NYT is a bit more liberal than Israel on both Israel and on U.S. domestic policy (both because their IQs are higher, and because domestic liberalism benefits American Jews directly while Israel only benefits their ethnic genetic interests)
One of the key ways to tell if a politician is beholden to the [redacted by pp, dec 10, 2017] is their stance on borders. No other issue aside from foreign policy is more indicative in my opinion. This is what unites Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell – the shared understanding the US should not have borders and therefore de facto no longer be a nation state.
whether there is a best IQ for certain achievements idk, but there is a social IQ past which it impossible to achieve elite status if you’re not born with it.
master selects for useful idiots.
By the mid-sixteenth century, slaves made up 10% of the populations of Lisbon, Evora, and the Algarve; Estremadura and the Alentejo counted 5% slave populations; northern towns (with the exception of Oporto, at 5%) were 1-2% slaves…
By the mid 18th century, London had the largest Black population in Britain, made up of free and enslaved people, as well as many runaways. The total number may have been about 10,000.
It was regarded as fashionable amongst the upper classes to have a Black servant and they sometimes feature in paintings, such as ‘The Family of Sir William Young’, circa 1768 by Zoffany. There were Black people in many towns, such as Liverpool, Bristol, Bath and Lancaster. Smaller number of Black people were also found in rural areas throughout the country. [31]
A number of Black people achieved prominence. Ignatius Sancho (1729–1780) opened his own grocer’s shop in Westminster. He wrote poetry and music and his friends included the novelist Laurence Sterne, David Garrick the actor and the Duke and Duchess of Montague. He is best known for his letters which were published after his death.
no numbers for spain and france.
so afaict, portugal is the only euro country with a significant amount of black african slave ancestry. supposedly ronaldo is a smidgen black.
“master” is a personification of an impersonal system.
actual masters are often selected and often dumber than their slaves.
Master is not a person or a system, it’s whatever ethnic group is the ruling class in a particular society at a particular time.
In relevance to Philo’s “Master” idea, if he is using this to explain East asian’s perceived agreeableness it would imply that the ruling class has considerably different mental or morphological attributes in comparison to the average. Technically paedomorphosis should indicate docility.
The only notable example I could think of is the Ainu in Japan but I pretty sure Philo is almost exclusively meaning China in his rants. Jews don’t run China, and the places they supposedly do are notably less domesticated in personality.
Rushton saw East Asian obedience to master as genetic superiority, because it was evidence of more evolved social organization which he viewed as K selected trait, selected by nature, not master, as pill contends
but there are masters in mono-ethnic societies also.
If master is the same ethnic group as you, then you and master tend to have the same political interests, so he’s less of a master and more of a partner.
“selected by nature, not master, as pill contends”
Which would make more sense because if this ruling class were selectively breeding the population, then they should be phenotypically different, which isn’t the case.
“Which would make more sense because if this ruling class were selectively breeding the population, then they should be phenotypically different, which isn’t the case.”
Your thinking about classes to rigidly. Upper class men often have sex with lower class women. Its very common for lords of the manor to have sex with maids or slaves.
I think of the ruling elites as more like bubbles foaming up from the water. Its not hereditary as such. But once enough come together and organise you get distinct patterns of ancestry and so on. One of those patterns in the West is judaism.
I’ve said before that Bezos was not born a Master, but has been inducted into the Master class as evidenced by his ownership of the CIA’s flagship paper and of course his direct contracts with the CIA.
Robert linked to a documentary Lance Latham made on the more less the 400 and how they control America. Id encourage you to watch it.
The Forbes 400?
No, Talbot refers to the in or around 400 families that have ruled america as an oligarchy in all but name since the late 1800s. Vanderbilt, Du Pont, Dillon, the Boston Brahmins, Rockefeller etc etc.
These people do literally meet up and discuss what the country should do and chose presidents in ‘smoke filled rooms’ and staffed key positions in the bureacracy and especially the CIA up until the later 20th century.
The Bush, Kennedy families are more public examples. The Bush family started as private bankers to the 400 in the Brown Brother Harriman private wealth management firm.
They are not necessarily genetically distinct at all. But there are patterns. They are not all on the same page. And entry into and out of that world is permissible and can happen. E.g Jeff Bezos.
The Forbes family is actually one of these families. Another media family is the Hearst family. Steve Schwarzmann I think is married to one of the Hearst family.
An interesting thing is to ask why Michael Milken got dethroned. Milken was one of the first finance billionaires and adjusted for inflation probably wealthier than Scwarzmann today.
I dug around his fall from grace and people from the investment bank Dillon Read are really culpable. The treasury secretary Brady was from that bank. Dillon Read is as establishment as you could have gotten in those times. They were the equivalent to Goldman Sachs in terms of insider influence in those times, but for gentiles.
I should be paid for those nuggets of information. The vast majority of people are completely unaware that they even live in an oligarchy.
i think pill means lewis lapham.
yes. milken claimed he was targeted for “democratizing capital”.
all he really did was sell people original issue junk.
from what i understood master is simply the legal and judicial system who punish rule breakers.
rulling families of an empire could be less selected by the master than the rest of population but they would still be to an extent as long as they don’t reign forever.
so melo isn’t right that the rulling class should necessarly be totally different from the rest of people.
i think pp don’t get it.
“Its very common for lords of the manor to have sex with maids or slaves.”
It defeats the purpose of selective breeding if you stick your dick in the pot here and there.
“One of those patterns in the West is judaism.”
I’m not talking about the west, I’m talking about China and it’s supposed “master”
“so melo isn’t right that the rulling class should necessarly be totally different from the rest of people.”
That’s nto what i said, the ruling class would look different if it were selectively breeding the normal population, but like you said if we consider “master” as the law and order system, then it makes sense to some degree.
but the very idea of IQ or social intelligence existing independently of the particular society and its interaction with the particular individual’s genome is an idea that only autistic people can believe in.
or rather autistic people believe in it but don’t know that they believe in it.
they’re too autistic to even see that it might not be true. let alone see that it’s ridiculous, obviously false.
but the very idea of IQ or social intelligence existing independently of the particular society and its interaction with the particular individual’s genome is an idea that only autistic people can believe in.
Who’s the most socially intelligent person you can think of? If they were born in a very different country, they wouldn’t have been socially intelligent?
noam chomsky. no contest. and this despite his nonsense about israel and global warming.
maybe. maybe not.
nobody knows.
part of imagining things being a different a way is seeing them in the first place. i think a lot of people are basically sleep walking during their waking hours.
by “socially intelligent” i don’t mean what pill means. someone could be autistic and socially intelligent at the same time.
socially intelligent sense 1: the ability to see when you’re boring or offending people.
sense 2: able to see the irrationality in one’s society as a whole.
sense 1 is an instinct. there’s not really a continuum. almost everyone has it, but the idea of the continuum serves an ideological purpose…it explains why high IQ people aren’t always rich.
sense 2: requires genuine intelligence. should be much more strongly correlated with IQ than subjective judgements of social intelligence in the sense 1 sense.
Chomsky would probably score perfect on the Wechsler comprehension subtest. His Israel nonsense is just denial on his part, or deliberate deception. Either way, if he didn’t know he was Jewish, he wouldn’t say such things.
of historical figures. jesus. marx and engels. diogenes of sinope.
I agree with robert but I don’t think they are distinct senses. When a person can tell if someone is lying, or is aware of how certain types of people go to which clubs to get laid or knows what to write in a speech to motivate people it usually goes hand in hand with seeing brainwashing.
However, I do think you need a superior verbal IQ to see the extent of a phenomenon and to ‘weigh up’ things you can’t directly observe socially or derive from direct social experience.
I mean for example, the idea that ‘my neighbour is black and he is nice = all black people are not linked to violence’ is a verbal IQ idea.
At the end of the day, the decision whether the particular extends to the general is something you test for in Weschler. But I suppose what you notice in the first place or what you ask is generalisable or not is derived from social intelligence.
I meant the decision not to generalise my black neighbour is nice ergo all blacks are not violent and police are evil is a VIQ thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Averell_Harriman
A member of the 400. Read his bio. Its very atypical of a 400 member.
All this stuff hides in plain sight. He was one of the key people who chose the democratic candidates.
My. IQ is. Too low for such nerdy conversations. I can’t deal.
Deal with it!
Don’t masturbate so much.
To me Trump is the most socially intelligent person. He jokes about it but being able to negotiate, say the right things, present, weigh up people or put himself in certain social situations and time it correctly is nothing something you can teach. Anymore than you can teach an idiot to do calculus or someone to write good music. Its innate.
Oh, no. Conservatives don’t support Israel because it’s powerful or because Jews are wealthy or anything like that. They support it because 1. They think Israel is a necessary part of starting the Apocalypse; 2. Jews are in the Bible, so they have a soft spot for Judaism; and 3. They feel sorry for the Jews due to the Holocaust.
By contrast, Conservatives don’t see Palestinians as “underdogs,” but as practically followers of the antichrist who are trying to get their hands on Jerusalem, Jesus’s city. The Jews have to have Jerusalem so they can trigger the Apocalypse and Jesus can come back, not the Muslims.
Maybe most conservatives won’t agree with every point enumerated above, but the general sentiment is there.
I didn’t say they support them because they’re powerful and wealthy. I said supporting the power structure (regardless of why they’re doing it) is how i define conservatism.
The way chomsky lies about the us controlling israel reminds me a lot of stpehen jay gould. Im not aware of any other lies chomsky tells so it may be just a n identity issue rather than flat put conmanship.
And its a lie because someone that smart must see it.
I think if you said 10 years ago all tge top a list actresses were essebtually prostitutes for studio executives people would laugh or find it crazy. So it might not be unfathomable that many politicians are involved in occult paedophile rings. Most people are still grappling with the idea all western foreign policy is a jewish kabuki theatre.
These things only seem weird or bizarre because we have a false anchoring point. .i.e what hollywood/media says is normal. If the news teported crime as it really is, or the nature of the immigrants as they really are…nobody could write an acadmeic paper saying x million immigrants will pay for pensions.
This goes back to platos forms. Every person has the idea or unconcnscious idea of what a chair should be. Or a mother. Or a soldier. I dont think theyre innate but they settle in pretty quickly and are very hard to change. People forms have been manipulated so that they have false ideas of what is possible.
This is why i say that westerns ate possibly more brainwashed than chinese, russians, venezualans, cubans. Because the forms of some basic things like foreignor, enemy, evil person, politican, wife etc are so distorted.
Its 1984.
Everyone that read 1984 came away from the experience with the convicton that if hey were put into a mind control upside down down is up freedom is slavery type scenario they too would be able to see the contradictions and ride with the resistance to the truth. Tge fact is almost every human being ain a major civilisaton is born into a 1984 scenario whether it is islam, the communist party or jewish mind control or some other. And the funniest thing is that people in entrapped in one scenario can see the stupidity or cruelty of another scenario and vice versa .
And so eurasians will say to oceanians your leader is a tyrant and oceanians will laugh at the idea.
Every civilisation developed a priest caste because one of the prices of civilisation may be that people must live in an illusion for order to emerge. That being said this does not mean all illusions are the exact same in their effects on the populace or on their effects to members of alternate cults.
If you look at the historical record in every major civiliation slavery is not seen as immoral up until relatively recently in history and only then by gentile whites it seems. Obviously those enslaved see it as immoral too. If blacks had the musket and cannon they would enslave their neighbours too.
Slave morality is the idea that there should be no slaves and is the basis for christianity.
It amuses me so because rightwingers would say communism is evil but chrisitianity and communism are largely twin brothers in that both are slave moralities. And both invented by jews.
I also accept the idea that abolishing slavery or the quasi slavery that happened under the robber barons is objectively better for everyone in the long run as anyone could end a slave or a factory worker with enough generations in the family.
So the cult leaders may have been making up lies to further their parasitical agenda but they actually made the world a better place. No communism. No free primary education. No philosopher.
[redacted by pp, dec 12, 2017]
Santo have you ever met gerge michael?
Hahahaha t
Google took out an 8 page advertisment in the economists world in 2018 issue.
Why would a tech company take out an 8 page ad in an elitist publication…..
https://goo.gl/images/GQ2YwF
Pretty accurate portrayal of civilsation by stephen king.
Compare hunter gatherer beliefs with civilised peoples beliefs throughtout history.
The civilised people believed in MUCH wackier things.
probably because hunter gatherer are more in contact with reality. they have to deal with reality every single day of their lives, otherwise they die.
If the aztecs hadnt created civilisation. They would have been just like native americans. Ie less crazy.
It just occured to me that if zuckerberg ran he would be the first ever autistic president of elected. I cant think of any president that was autistic. Maybe there have been. But my suspicion is that autism is bred in population and i strongly doubt frontier era politicians would have ever met an autistic person.
If oprah ran dhe would be by far the best candidate the democrats could find. In my opinion she has all the personal and bank account traits needed for president. However as she is not a neoonservative the party ((((leaders)))) would probably rig it against her like they defrauded sanders. Honestly, i would bet she wins most votes than booker, harris, even biden.
(If biden ran that paedophile video of him touching children would end his run).
i agree with ian smith why bother with this israelo palestinian conflict.
all jews should live on israel.
and the few jews that would still live in the west should serve the interest of white people.
palestinians are not in a that bad situation, palestinian youth have one of the highest obesity rate and they have ps4 and xbox ones to play with.
i feel bad for minority that nobody care about but palestinians seems a bit like crybabies.
persecuted minorities*
Deal with Dildos said it best: My profile picture is racist. Look. I hold up my hands. I apologise for any offence caused.
TO SEE THE INCREDIBLE MAGICAL NEGRO.
I STEAL AND I AM ROBBED.
I AM THE SPECKLED BEAR AND THE BALD EAGLE.
THEY CALL ME CRAZY BUT YOU ARE CRAZIER
DESTRUCTION IS MY VICE.
CIVILISATION I REJECT
I AM INCREDIBLE. AND YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT.
– Unknown asylum inmate.
“Racism is no vice in the defence of liberty”
– Unknown asylum inmate.
Race-ism as a descriptor etymologically stems from the early 20th century beliefs that some races were superior to others.
If you read the reports from scientists and academics of those times talking about blacks (because that is the main exhibit under consideration in the gallery of racism), many of the comments are common sense but just degauche to say. As in, if they are your neighbours, co workers etc you can’t say it. But if they live 5000 miles away, it is psychologically permissible to say them.
I mean, they did skull size surveys, observed black children, did psychological experiments etc etc . Most of the results are still valid in my opinion. They do fail the marshmellow test more than whites. They have no future self conception. They can’t do higher order analytical thinking. Etc. I don’t need to slather on this stuff.
So an autist born in the early 20th century would look at the science of the day and actually be quite HBD.
But I doubt autism existed as much back then due to the way I think autism develops in human populations.
For the record I actually don’t ‘hate’ blacks. But I do see them like a farmer sees crop disease I suppose. I suppose [redacted by pp, dec 12, 2017] would generally mean blacks are encouraged not to reproduce as much. I don’t know if I would regulate reproduction like that.
I personally have always gotten on well with blacks and many of them have been close friends. But I am definitely a race-ist. Its a bit like I avoid taxes, but I think loopholes should be removed.
In public, I keep saying africa should merge with Europe of course. AYIYIYIYIYIYIYIYIYI.
peepee shows her anti-nazism when she claims that humans are the only species which inhabits all environments and does so via behavioral adaptations…or whatever she said.
she forgot about the dog.
Dogs don’t count. They didn’t survive naturally but in captivity like slaves or zoo animals.
WRONG!
most of the world’s dogs are not and have nor been pets or servants peepee.
most are like very good looking cockroaches. they hang around, living of human garbage.
AND!
the dog is NOT the result of deliberate domestication.
the “feral” dog came before the bichon frise.
to be human is to love dogs.
princess diana was not a dog lady. very bad!
who hasn’t known a dog, he hasn’t known himself or other men.
Wrong!
Dogs were brought to Australia like slaves. They were not adaptable enough to colonize every continent except as involuntary migrants:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/how-did-dingo-get-australia
WRONG!
they swam.
For those who don’t know he’s joking, they did NOT swim
I disagree. Dog migration over large distances is a very common thing.
Philosopher if you don’t know anything, then you don’t disagree.
Dogs only migrated to Australia & the Americas because they were brought by people:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/schwartz-dog.html
Ha, I laughed out loud during my lunch break at a nice restaurant reading the dog exchange sbove😂😂😂
it’s as if i were speaking a-whole-nother language.
do the abos use dingos or keep them as pets? why would they bring them to australia and later have no use for them? is the genetic variation in dingos and in abos consistent with the theory that there was never a land bridge to australia?
To reach Australia through the Malay Archipelago even at the lowest sea level of the Last Glacial Maximum, a journey of at least 50 km (30 mi) over open sea between ancient Sunda and Sahul was necessary, indicating that the dingo arrived to Sahul by boat.
but there’s another canid whose presence on an island is mysterious.
The route by which the Falkland Islands wolf was established in the islands was unknown for a long time, as the islands have never been connected to the mainland[20] and there are no other native land mammals.[21] No other oceanic island as remote as the Falklands has a native canid; the island fox of California in the US and Darwin’s fox of Chile both inhabit islands much closer to a continent…Berta and other authors suggest that it was unlikely that the wolf’s ancestors could have survived the last Ice Age on the Falklands and they must therefore have arrived later, within the last ten thousand years, crossing a wide expanse of the South Atlantic.[22]…Some speculated that the species had originally arrived with indigenous peoples visiting the islands after the settlement of the Americas, having been kept by them in a semi-domesticated state.[24] There is, however, no definite evidence that humans ever visited the Falklands before the Age of Discovery (the islands are not visible from the mainland, and traveling to the Falklands in open canoes would have been very difficult and extremely dangerous) nor is there any evidence that the ancestors of the wolf were ever domesticated…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_wolf
So the little dogs doggie-paddled all the way to the Falkland Isalnds? WOW!
http://blindgossip.com/
Great website for juicy celeb gossip!
Santo, is Bradely Cooper gay? Have you ever met him?
Honestly, Bradely Cooper looks very straight to me. He doesnt have gayface. He actually looks like some of the guys I went college with who did very well with women. The rumours he beat his ex wife definitely suggest he is hetero.
Cory Booker is definitely gay. And so is Marco Rubio. I would put money on those two for the reason that jewish power brokers are often gay and naturally think some of the men they sleep with should run for office.
I remember reading a lot article a while back mentioning Marco had a ‘mentor’ who owned the hotel he used to work in as common staff. And of course:
https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FAbxFMBHHncQ%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&f=1
Just damning.
no one can be gay.
because…
no one is gay.
http://yournewswire.com/james-woods-john-podesta-pizzagate/
James woods accusing podesta of being a ‘chimo’ as you put it.
either you or i have poor reading comp.
Speculation that code words were used is not mine. It’s absurd that the #Clintons
are part of a child sex ring…
Yes, yours because that tweet was from last year. But his chimo tweet is from this year. So he obv read more about it.
Funny how we see a persons sexuality is telling of their character for some reason. This is something Santo doesn’t ‘get’ because hes too biased. But if Santo can say paedophiles are evil etc, why does he think its ‘deformed’ to say that peoples natural reaction to homosexuals is negative as well?
I don’t ‘hate’ homosexuals by the way. I think its a lot better than paedophilia or bestiality or being a rapist of course.
But let’s face it all homos are degenerates.
Although straight male sexual behavior would look more like homo sexual behavior if women were as loose as the average gay man.
Yes 🙂
How did it go on your LSAT ? Hope you got want you wanted .
norm macdonald makes a joke about that…
how even if there were heterosexual bathhouses straight men wouldn’t be as promiscuous as gays.
yeah. but not 9 times a night.
in 1983 mike wallace interviewed joe bananno and sons. bananno had been in the US for 60 years but had never had to learn english.
this is a stellar example of ethnic networks.
wallace asked one of the sons why he staid in the family business.
his answer was basically that he valued his family above everything else.
more likely he simply wouldn’t’ve felt comfortable elsewhere.
but this family above all else ethos is a result of the very low trust of southern italians.
it has some advantages, but its self contradictory.
1. when mafioisi kill they kill each other and more than that, they kill members of their own family.
2. their religiosity is a pretense. what did jesus say about family? he said…
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
but i can see how i myself would opt to join the family business if all it was was gambling or bootlegging or even drug dealing.
but extortion and prostitution are just plain evil.
and bootlegging isn’t a thing since repeal of the amendment.
in the whole US there are probably fewer than 1,000 made men.
how the mighty have fallen.
in 1928 al capone made $1.1b in today’s dollars.
my granddad was caught for bookmaking, but he was also a moonshiner.
i forget who he was. some italian american famous person said…something like…
why be offended by the stereotyope? italians are the BEST gangsters.
in reality the american mob is sicilian. maybe a few other southern italians.
it’s not italian in general.
and…in reality the reason has nothing to do with HBD.
southern italians make the best mobsters because there is a very long and ongoing tradition of organized crime in southern italy.
but for all the haters of garlic eaters…
northern italy is a rich developed country.
it even has a space company.
it’s the southern italians, 85% of italian immigrants to the US, that give italians a bad rep.
the things you can learn when you try to comprehend the in-comprehensible is a lot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1wD0ohx0qc
of course today even if there were a capo di tutti capi he would NOT be a billionaire.
let alone make $1b in a single year like capone did.
what happened to all that money?
in terms of discounted cash flows the richest american capo is worth no more than $500m.
that’s my guess.
Mugabe will happy to know that I’ve opted to stay in Canada. I will not move to the US! I can’t imagine living in the US. It’s a shithole.
She lives.
lots less money.
I hate illegal immigrants.
http://www.thephysicsforum.com/trash-can/121-ctmu-b-s-brilliant.html
http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2011/02/11/another-crank-comes-to-visit-the-cognitive-theoretic-model-of-the-universe/
http://www.thescienceforum.com/scientific-study-religion/25350-chris-langans-ctmu.html
Yes I’m aware that scientists don’t respect his theory, but we don’t know if the problem is with his theory or their ability to comprehend it.
Read Langans second and third response in the goodmath link. It makes sense. These people are basically arguing the veracity of your damien hirst trees for the forst art theory using set theory. I actually am reminded of the ways I criticise pumpkin for his inappropriate use of ‘science’ to describe ontology reading Langans response.
“However, when a form duly reflects the actual structure of X – e.g., when it is an isomorphism or a model of X which attributes to X the distinguishable, observationally replicable structure we actually observe when we look at X – it indeed defines a property of X, at least for scientific purposes. For example, where X is actually green (reflects green light), the form “X is green” ascribes the property “greenness” to X. Similarly, because the formal entity “set”, meaning “collection of distinct objects”, actually describes the structure of the universe – which is in fact a collection of distinct objects, plus additional structure – the property of “being a set” is a factual property of the universe, and this permits us to say “the universe is a set”. ”
Interesting idea Chris has. He could have just said, “the unverse resembles a bowl mathematiclaly, so its fair to call it a bowl”. I think chris would literally have been better off having a checkbox beside all known attributes of a ‘set’ as a ‘concept’ and ticking them off as he goes through them in his response. The only thing I learned in banking was breaking down things to puerile processes actually makes sense sometimes.
What I don’t like about Chris, but what is probably mentioned in his papers is just why the universe is not only a set, but has elements outside of the observable set. I think, that is the physicist bit of his theory.
But the philosophical part I understand.
I didn’t like the way the critic mark used examples like hawking radiation to say the universe is not a set. Hawking radiation may be modelled using other types of math, but its sum effects can put into ‘blocks’ in a set theory if simplified enough.
This is a bit like saying the results of races in the olympics can’t be put into set theory because the math of a person’s limbs physically moving is not tenable for a set. Idiotic.
The only concern is that by ‘processing’ phenonomenon into chunks like that, you really are missing subtely but I imagine Chris thought about this and other concerns in his papers.
I’m not a physicist so what I say might be wrong, but Langan sounds like he understands what he is arguing. The proof is in the math though which i am not qualified to read.
So theres going to be a gigantic scandal in rap music soon. Apparently a rapper has come forward to all the gossip magazines and named an executive that forced rappers he signed to give him bjs to get record deals and the names involved are huge.
From what I’ve read over the past year, the guy at Arista Records, Clive Davis fits the bill.
From wiki:
“In 2013, Davis publicly came out as bisexual in his autobiography The Soundtrack of My Life. On the daytime talk show Katie, he told host Katie Couric that he hoped his coming out would lead to “greater understanding” of bisexuality.[1][28] Since 2004, Davis has been in a relationship with a man, which followed a 14-year relationship with a male doctor”
BINGO! (the blind mentions the executive identifies as bisexual)
http://blindgossip.com/?p=88858
…..
http://www.clivedavis.com/
He has the same eyes as the psychopathic pick up artist Ross Jeffries [redacted by pp, dec 15, 2017]
Has Santo ever slept with Clive Davis to get a record deal? What was his breath like? Would you have slept with him anyway?