I’ve said before that there is no better way to learn about late 20th century America than watching old syndicated daytime talk shows. This episode of Donahue from 1979 is especially educational. Despite her small brain, her Jewish genetics allows her to hold her own against the big brained Donahue as she argues that altruism is evil, corporate monopolies are caused by government, education should NOT be publicly funded and no woman should ever be president.
A brilliant rational lady, but her objectivism becomes subjectivism when asked about the Middle East, as ethnic genetic interests heat up.
Pumpkin Person 
First Pipi,
She’s not/wasn’t rational,
No evil people is rational. Got it??
Second,
Do you know her brain size?? Or are you extrapolating average Jewish brain size for her???
Her cranium looks tiny compared to Donahue’s. No room for big brain.
Seems what matter for a thinker is the frontal lobe, white, gray and rainbow matter…
Daytime tv isnt just for bored housewifes and dolts in my opinion. Why do the advertisers assume housewives are dolts?
Anyways oprah appealed to dolts because she has a big brain and ayn rand appeals to phds in economics because she has a small brain. And thats why oprahs vision of society makes more sense than rands. Its because of brain sizes.
it’s hilarious how peepee doesn’t get that you’re ridiculing her.
I get that he’s mocking me but some of his comments are so hilarious i have to allow them
He can be very funny guy, but I’m such an easy target for comedy. I’m obsessed with a daytime talk show host’s head size. The jokes almost write themselves
Ayn rand keeps saying shes objective because her communist opponents were dirty liars and scoundrels and cheaters and if they bothered to tell the truth then she wouldnt need to be objective. We should thank ayn for being objective and proving what a joke the welfare system was by living on medicate payments in the final years of her death PROVING OBJECTIvELY that government handouts kill the incentive to be healthy.
that would be hilarious if true. did ayn not have the money for her medical bills? sad!
Government handouts are the reason i havent set up a multibillion tech startup helping people find the closest bin for their litter.
All tech startups contribute enormous vale to society. For example uber gets people to find private car rentals. Nobody could even imagine or hope to copy such a complicated abd technically sophisticated idea like lyft and halo uber and that app in indonesia.
Many people think uber is brand recognition. What a joke. The free market allocates resources efficently to brands?! Hahahaha. I have a degree in economics and i understand everything about the economy. And it is a FFAAAACCCCT that the stock market knows more than government bureacrats ever will. Thats why bureacrats sent us to the moon and we have indonesia best technology as the avant garde of current technology atartups. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
You people are so dumb. Bow to my big brained daytime talk show skillz.
Bill gates is the richest man in the world . Would be interested to see if the implicit discounted casflows of the stock value in 1997 actually matched what microsoft made in the next 15 years.
I bet all tech cos never actually make the cash.
As the jews said it best: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
it is true in the case of aapl. iirc, if you’d bought apple at its bottom ca 2003, today you’d be getting the same amount in dividends every year.
in the case of msft…it’s paid $11.85b in dividends so far in 2017. how much was its market cap in 1997?
in 1997 wiki lists the 10 largest public companies by market cap. msft is #3 at $160b.
so maybe msft has been and is overvalued, but if you’d bought in 1997 you’d be getting a yield of 7.4% today and for a very long time thenceforth.
But a yield today of 7.4% should be discounted when buying 20 years ago. I don’t know what discount model they were using, id have to read an analyst report.
My economics degree is right. Fama is right that discounted cash flows are the best estimation of npv and not based on forbes magazine articles or how much free money the traders get from the retail side of banking conglomerates. Hahahaha. This is why none of you are qualified to do finance like i am. I am OBJECTIVE. And the world works exactly how i think it should work.
Mikey blaze back me up. You did a fiscounted cash flow analysis and compared it to the leading analysts of comcast stock abd took a moving average punt while hedging out the sigma with calls on rachel maddows tv ratings. 100% he did that because mukey like me is 100% rational.
(Bizarrely i may be the most rational person in this comment section…)
Puts with her tv ratings i mean.
You look very rational at the moment, indeed
yes. stock market volatility is absurd compared to future 30 year dividends. was it shiller who showed this? to this fama responded that the apparent excess volatility was all due to uncertainty regarding future interest rates, the rate at which dividends would be discounted. wonder if he’s actually done a paper on this.
It seems Ayn Rand did not know about the Illuminati.
from google translate
the pyramid on the dollar
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum
The new world order signals enterprise
The dollar was created in the 40’s – From there was Cybernetics which sees everything as a feedback mechanism. The mind was seen as a feedback mechanism. With the right input actions are controllable. And prediction is possible. Categorization and relationships.
FDR and Harry S. Truman both 33-degree freemasons.
Esoteric knowledge. Gnosis.
The interstate highway was paved in the 50’s.
King Solomon built the first temple in Jerusalem.
The highest Illuminati are simulating every human on the planet.
They mostly have IQs higher than 150.
The government is mostly run by people above 125.
Ayn Rand is so nieve and so are so many libertarians.
Thinking that capitalism the best thing ever is such a low ideal.
It completely ignores the complexities of the world.
Her philosophy is for children.
Today I was asked by my psychiatrist my religious beliefs.
I said there are forces moving things in the world.
Ten percent of mathematicians a year are hired by the NSA to solve math problems. If we low ball it that is over 200,000 people. When I was on facebook I had friended from knowing him on a forum told me he had solved math problems for the NSA.
The internet is backed up by the way back machine at CERN, I think? This is important to simulate the population of earth. They want to trace everything a person does back to them. They want to find hidden influences so look for them by abnormalities in the events around areas of interest. Ripples mean an object was dropped into the pond. Triangulation finds where the object hit the pond.
Just by being on the internet they know where my ripples are spreading to. Locke Martin is hired to build all the Supercomputers the CIA and NSA need. And it is much bigger than an academic computer, simply because it is a server farm, not a unified unit. Cybernetics is applied to supercomputer from the neuroscience research of PhDs.
Talk shows are ok I guess but I would rather know about super advanced technology. I would like to know what the people IQ 160 are doing with the supercomputer. And what exactly is happening when my ripples spread around the internet.
If I had to guess, I’d say most scientists and mathematicians of ‘160IQ’ have no idea what the purpose of their work is for the NSA.
Not sure if being math smart makes one more autistic. Could just be that math is one of the few fields were high IQ autistics can dominate.
Btw, philosopher, can you make a throwaway email I can reach you at. There’s a fascinating personality test I want you of all people to take.
Most true. But I would say that the positions of power to understand what the math is for are up as high as those people. To coordinate the integration of the maths the people in charge would be extremely high as well (150 – 160). This is not about the head director. This is about running the NSA as flawless as can be done. People in the NSA with High IQ are given the most complex jobs. This includes data analysis and Top secret information. They need to know everything about the inner workings of the NSA so that no errors happen and that time and resources are not wasted. CEO’s usually have IQ’s of 130. The NSA wants the best leadership so the choose several people (not just one) to run be in charge of operations. People above 150 because they are dealing with extremely complex challenges. Inside their organization and outside their organization. It requires a tremendous amount of intelligence to run the organization and its subproblems. There might even be 2 or more people around 170 that are in charge of some department or another. The NSA has a Global reach in many areas. They need to have genius level smart people or they could not handle the entire operation.
Edward Snowden’s IQ is 140.
After the leak, I am sure The NSA restructured everything they were doing as fast as possible. Their internal security systems I bet were improved by 20 times.
SNOWDEN – Official Trailer
No, not that they can’t understand, but that they wouldn’t be told what the NSA wants to do.
I think the people that know what the NSA is doing and who their Master is and what Master desires are going to be selected on the basis of race (i.e. jewish) rather than IQ
The NSA/CIA/DIA/DARPA etc etc were created to control the domestic population of the USA. There is no other bigger reason for why they exist.
The people that run these orgs are the same people that run CNN/WAPO/NYT.
They will literally know each other socially and go to the same functions, dinner parties and events. Some of them won’t be clued in to the occupation and will be selected to be there on the basis of technical ability. Some of them are aware of parts of the puzzle but have been told its for humanitys good or somesuch. Finally there will be a coterie of them who will know why its necessary to mind control and physically control white gentiles and are bribed, blackmailed or are themselves jews.
“No, not that they can’t understand, but that they wouldn’t be told what the NSA wants to do.”
That would only be for the techie people with 150 and above. I am talking about the management positions where the 150 IQ and above would be told what the NSA wants to do. Their super high intelligence would make them superior managers. And it would make them the top managers because they can handle so much information that they would have almost complete understanding of the NSA’s inner workings.
And all the managers work together considering if we may 20 managers with IQ’s of 160 it is imperative that the whole organization is not fragmented but highly integrated. You cannot say they know nothing about what the NSA wants to do because they would understand what everyone at the NSA is doing because they manage the whole operation. These IQ 160 managers coordinate the entire operation. The IQ 160 mathematicians do not know anything because management is not their job. The Job of a manager at the NSA is to know what the NSA wants to do. Being IQ 160 would mean they know exactly what the NSA is doing because they manage more than is humanly possible compared to a manager with 130 IQ.
Don’t think about the IQ 160 mathematician at the NSA.
Think of the IQ 160 manager at the NSA.
They know what is going on not the mathematician.
snowdens iq is shit because being a programmer of any kind boosts your iq by like 20 points due to the nature of the profession and the iq tests
Fenoopu, I think you have no idea what you’re talking about.
It’s too paranoid to think that Snowden and Assange may be fake-opponents of system**
your mom, gondawa
IQ can/is really increased by knowledge, i don’t know why so many people fight me about this, for me it’s almost a fact/glaringly obvious
as for programming, it is certainly the most effective mental test of all time, alongside advanced mathematics, maybe better. it also teaches reasoning and analysis skills, allowing you to break down a question in an IQ test into ‘laws’ with clarity
How the hell are you gonna learn programming in the 1st place with shit IQ?
When I tried to learn to program, I temporarily lost 5 IQ points. Too much crying and stuff. Affected my mental illness. I have messed up emotions from it.
illuminati cat u r such a cutie pie
ayn rand was many (bad) things. brilliant was NOT one of them.
[redacted by pp, sept 6, 2017]
Myopia caused by deficient exposure to sunlight.
Kids stay inside and study get smarter.
Wearing Glasses Linked To IQ?
Today I walked two blocks back to my house at high noon. I entered the house and everything was hazy. I had a hard time seeing where I was going.
I started wearing glasses in the 10th grade. It was amazing because I could see every leaf on the trees we passed by in the car. If I spent more time outdoors I would probably not need glasses anymore.
i mean sure they are, just not for the reasons you think, and you’ve gone in completely the wrong direction
I have a pet thiory that myopia is caused by excess use of sight and that there is a correlation between electricity/use sight during the night AND ”myopia/general sight problems”.
i agree, there is strong correlation with using sight to read at night and myopia
my brother was brought up with just as heavy computer use as me, but i need contacts and he doesn’t
reason is probably because i read books under low lighting for nearly all my childhood and he didn’t read shit
but hey, i’m smarter so it all paid off in the end
Yessas
So Macdonald has a chapter on psychoanalysis and Freud and gives damning evidence Freud was a tribal hack looking to undermine western sexual mores and culture because of antisemitic incidents in his life and family.
Now I’ve read some of Freud’s work and I think it makes sense and is actually somewhat genius as you all know.
I think we have an issue here whereby, sometimes when a person criticises a system or organisation or person, his criticism is true, although it is for hypocritical or nefarious reasons.
This contrasts with more traditional jewish critiques of culture as MacDonald catalogues elsewhere which are fraudulent or flat out false like Gould, Boas, Herzl and the more sophisticated realms of postmodernism and moralism/’all men are created equal’ (by a Creator jews keep denigrating quite ironically).
I think my overwhelming sense is that in social ‘sciences’ and humanities and philosophy, everything a jew says will be a lie to advance the Tribe.
It just so happens in psychiatry, what one says cannot be a generalisation. It can be easily testable. So the reason someone might be anti semitic and aggressive because they dont get enough sex or didn’t masturbate as teenagers is actually empirically solid to me. What Freud does though is then say, Western society should be sexually deregulated to make life easier for jews. This is incredibly arrogant.
What i find most interesting about Macdonalds book is how gentile whites seem so open to even entertaining these fairly tribal hostilities. MacDonald mentions how the Ottomans didn’t even bother letting jews print books. Hahahahaha.
The same thing that make westerns tolerant is what makes them rich, but what makes them now slaves.
IRONY
It’s quite interesting if one thinks deeper that Nazism in Germany was basically a Med movement with Nordic followers — the same way Jews have a lot influence in the Anglosphere, especially in regards to America with its Northern Euro minions. And readers here understand that Jews are closely related to Southern Euros, their favorite comparison with Italians.
Basically, Nazism is an inverse of Jewish control. Its leaders of the Third Reich, the Herrenvolk in the likes of Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, and Hess, not exactly Northern European in phenotype, more like a form of Mafioso in Northern Euro environment.
FYI there was a very good article on masons and secret societies I found Anime. I think for a nitty gritty black belt knowledge of history you should know how the proto deep state worked in the pre 20th century West with the masonic lodges and h’assassins societies and that.
I’m not really that much into them though. Right now I’m concentrating on learning about the jews and what actually happened in the past 100 years specifically.
There’s just to much world history to read. I’m an amateur detective looking for patterns in these.
When I was young I remember thinking I always wanted to know how the world worked and the ‘secret knowledge’.
I think i’ve come very far in this goal. I don’t think 1 person can ever get the complete picture as too many people who know this and that have died or not recorded things or the info is buried. For example, even thought the JFK files are supposed to be realeased, soon the deep state will just extend the deadline or redact everything.
Same with the aliens. John podesta asked clinton to make the intelligence agencies send everything to them and they wouldn’t do it apparently. Hahahaha.
Just for clarity I believe we are secretly ruled by a jewish elite a LOT more than the possible evidence that we’ve encountered alien life already. For example, the breakdown of the soviet state would surely have led some documents to come to light on aliens in my opinion from their space programme.
i’ve seen these posters claiming 43% of jews are in the 1%. this is false. the pew study was on religious affiliation, so some jews would have had none i guess. it found that 46% of households who claimed judaism made more than $100,000 per year. i found it on pew’s own site. so jews are 36% of the .0…01%. that’s true. the professional jew haters have to get their facts straight. lion claims to make 160+k per year yet have a net worth of only 600k. he’s not in the 1% and he makes more by himself than most jewish households make. furthermore a lot of the reason why jews are at the top with hindus for household income is they’re concentrated in high income areas. not only are jews an urban people, but the “urbanities” they live in are high income among other urbanities. 20% of the nyc metro area white population is jewish…if one counts jews as white.
the general principle is that over-representation increases going up in percentiles if the population has a higher mean and the same variance. so if 36% of of the forbes 400 are jews, a lot less than 36% of the 1% are jews.
the same applies to jews at elite colleges. unz claims only 6% of national merit scholars self-identify as jews by religion. the NMSQT may not have an ethnicity box for jewish, just for white non-hispanic. but i’d guess >=50% of american jews would check the judiasm box. maybe these are the dumb jews. so say 12% of national merit scholars are ethnically jewish. but then much less than 12% should be at HYPS et al.
the point is that a national merit scholar is like the forbes 400. if 6% of national merit scholars are jewish by religion then a lot less than 6% of such people are in the 1% in terms of the colleges they should be able to get into.
so if one divides the hillel claim by 2 and includes secular jews and takes into account that most elite colleges are in the northeast and jews are more likely to apply, then the over-representation of jews at elite schools may not be as bad as unz claims.
but it’s still bad.
Unz has been criticized for counting jews differently in different samples
The ideal way is surname analysis so if 1% of national merit winners are named shapiro but 2% of harvard is, then clearly they’re overrepresented, although national merit winners are a bad reference group given the geographic quotas
more than this!
synechdocally speaking…
it may be that for some mysterious reason jews with surname “shapiro” are more likely to be secular…not identify as jewish by religion when they register for the NMSQT…
but a general surname analysis should reveal…i agree…
did unz do that?
Unz used the Harvard Crimsons surname analysis.
You also have the phenomenon of cryptojudaism where many jews coming from E. Europe Americanised their surnames.
Probably the best way to account for all this is to ask which etnicity do you identify with and give ‘jewish’ as an option. Assume the the sale as they say.
Jews know they are not a religion, but a racial group.
the changing of names is NOT a problem for a surname analysis.
why?
because to the extent that jews change their names, identifiable jewish names become rarer/less frequent.
that is, the fraction jewish in a given population can be estimated using the name “cohen” by itself given its frequency in the general population. more exclusively jewish names is just more nails in the coffin of certainty.
lion claimed that jewish national merit scholars are undercounted by unz, because jews often don’t identify as jewish when they fill out the registration form. the form asks about religion not ethnicity iirc. so an irreligious jew would fill out “white non-religious” or something like that.
i’ll have to re-read that essay.
but peepee’s theory that IQ counts the same at every percentile of wealth is retarded.
in the 1970s the LBO and the hedge fund industries were nil. it’s not that jews have become very rich in general. they have become very rich in two specific ways, finance and mass media. google and facebook are mass media, almost all of their revenues are from ads. the difference is they have no “content”. their recent attempts to control the content created by their “users” shows they are just media companies. their customers aren’t their users. their customers are advertisers.
msft is not a media company. neither is oracle. but larry ellison is half jewish half italian.
the point is that if it weren’t possible to make a fortune in such unproductive ways as finance and mass media, jews would not be especially over-represented among the very rich. they would be over-represented, but not more than 2x or 3x their number in the general population. when half jews are counted that’s no more than 12% i expect. this would not be stir much anti-semitism.
If my theory is retarded what alternative theory are you implying?
One anomaly is that self-made decamillionaires are no smarter than self-made millionaires, but the correlation picks up again at even higher levels:
it doesn’t explain why jews are 36% of the forbes 400. that’s my only claim. if it did then jews would’ve become rich in all the ways possible, not just in two of them.
amazon is not a mass media company, despite its owning wapo.
bezos looks like a bezos, but his surname is from his cuban stepfather. his father’s surname was jorgensen. he may be part native american like richard rainwater as his family has been in texas for a very long time.
but even oracle is a mass media company to the extent that its software is mostly used for marketing purposes.
it was probably forbes where i read rainwater’s surname was native american. maybe this wasn’t true, but how does a lebanese surname become “rainwater”? and do lebanese shtup injuns?
[redacted by pp, sept 6, 2017]
They’re not the same person, he just hero worships him.
the point of this song is…even though its performers may not get it…
more than this…the christian revelation…there’s nothing…
in its most abstract sense…
christianity is the ULTIMATE and FINAL…
TRUTH.
Well when you buy a stock you are buying the companies present value of future free cashflows in theory.
That doesn’t quite make sense because many people buy stock on the assumption that there will be a capital gain from speculation e.g. the well known IPO bump.
What you get is kind of a quasi fundamental relationships between valuation and free cash flow. Its possible a company gets a good article in Fortune and gets the capital it needs to actually become a legit good company.
I wrote about reflexivity on a blog i had years ago because i think it applies to anything humans do. I think the perception can be managed to make the actual thing better.
Soros is very good in this. When he says russia is the biggest threat to humanity I’m genuinely deeply disappointed in him as I know he knows better but has to kowtow to his EGI as pumpkin says.
I think Buffets approach to cash flows makes sense if you are not looking for the ‘bump’, or you are not willing to bet on how people think about a company. This is why Buffet is notorious for looking at things like German car parts manufacturers and plastic companies. Things which are inherently not effected by sentiment like banks, techs, real estate or consumer electronics are.
leverage was a sine qua non of buffett’s success. there was a much publicized paper on this by AQR. screening companies for quality, low beta, and buying them on leverage explained almost all of buffett’s returns. http://docs.lhpedersen.com/BuffettsAlpha.pdf
However, we find that the alpha becomes insignificant when controlling for exposures to Betting-Against-Beta and Quality-Minus-Junk factors. Further, we estimate that Buffett’s leverage is about 1.6-to-1 on average. Buffett’s returns appear to be neither luck nor magic, but, rather, reward for the use of leverage combined with a focus on cheap, safe, quality stocks.
Soros point is that sentiment matters to the company. I think it makes sense and it explains why advertising/branding effects investors as much as retail consumers even though it shouldnt.
very good point.
if the investments manager sees an ad and thinks, “that’s awesome”, he should also think, “consumers will think it’s awesome too.” buy, buy, buy.
Broahahahahahahahahahahaha
A joke or it’s the first signs of dementia precoc.
pre-cock.
according to j-l marion ego sum qui sum was transformed into God is love by the NT.
More than This was the theme song of The Normal Heart.
if homos can actually experience the love of God in their homo liaisons…
then i bless them.
Schizo…
No matter how intellectual or high an IQ goes, that person, if they dont have aspergers will be tribal. Soros and Chomsky are good examples of leftists who can’t admit the hawkish establishment are neocon jews.
Tribes are usually groups of 150 people accounted by the Dunbar number. The number of ethnic groups in Europe is around 87. Like with my explanation that the socially smart bipeds mated with other socially smart bipeds to lead up to homosapiens. The migration of peoples into the land areas they resided in was also a selection process. most people in the deep south are Irish (from the map I saw) and they have totally different personalities from the Scandinavians.
Tribalism is much like brand marketing in the USA as it is. Because personality traits have diversified tremendously. (emo, gothic, punk rock) Those are tribes now. So there are people that go by white tribalism but this ignores the number of personality groups white have. My sister had a punk rock friend and she said she was made that everyone kept calling her a goth. The real kicker is that some people who identify as Furries. They wear full body animal costumes and many draw anthropomorphic animals. As people can find others just like themselves people tribal identity is nothing more than a lifestyles choice you liked from that core group you found.
I reluctant to say I fit in with the people around me. I am sure a fair amount of people in my city share my personality. They are just hard for me to find. I met a girl once and she was quiet but attentive just like I am. And my thoughts are that she recognized me and a person she could be with. She asked me to go to a picnic that Friday. I asked my mom to take me but she got mad at me and her what the only one that knew the directions. My understanding of mate selection is that the female has to be intuitive in her selection because of the risk of having children. I still think about her and the way she asked me to go to the picnic.
So the thing about tribalism is in the ethnic identity (or consumer identity) because of shared personality traits. A small number identify as white because the rest do not see white as granular enough to express their identity from their personality. People are terrible but that comes from personality not a vague notion of whiteness.
Dear White People (Despacito Parody) ~ Rucka Rucka Ali
Aspergers are spergy-tribal, even they are in feral cultural levels, pre-organized.
Reading up on some conspiracy theories — alleged that the Nazi leaders were made up of sociopathic Jewish types who wanted to get rid of their own. None of them looked particularly Nordic with blonde hair.
A guy like Joseph Goebbels, one of the most hateful of Jews, some believed he was of Sephardic ancestry. Looking at his features, Mr. Goebbels looks very Spaniard, almost like the greasy right wing Cubans the one can find in Miami, locally here in the US.
And the fact coming from anti-Semitic types that Jews are masters of manipulation, the Nazis epitomized this type of quality.
Looks very Hispanic to me:
”some believed he was of Sephardic ancestry. Looking at his features, Mr. Goebbels looks very Spaniard, almost like the greasy right wing Cubans the one can find in Miami, locally here in the US.”
Maybe, maybe not, a lot of native germans don’t look exactly like a hitlerist aryan propaganda. Hitler himself recognized that Germany was the land of ”alpine european subrace” and that britons were taller and less prone to overweight as many germans was/are/still are/still germans…
Beethoven also had a unusual racial phenotype. Some people even speculate if he had some african ancestry. Seems he had dutch or belgian ancestry, Beethoven surname look more dutch-like than german and that time Netherlands became recently independent from Hapsburg Spain and we know that iberians has been very universalistic, ;), more than most northern europeans.
Indeed northern europeans rarely mixed with non-european races, while just look to french colonies in North America. I read somewhere and i already talked about it, that latin-based european peoples/cultures tend to enphasize language/culture over race, much more than northern-germanic europeans. Maybe because they had mixed more with extra-european populations and ”rationalized’ in that way.
The famous Lebensraum was or seems it was a way to increase ”nordic blood” among germans. Even, during nazi blitzkrieg invasion in Norway a lot of norwegian/nordic women who were considered lived exemplar of nordic woman, was rapted to the Germany, to have babies with [blonde nordic] german soldiers.
Nazi elites all had Med looks, not Nordic. Hitler had a more Alpine elements and Himmler was a Med mixed with Mongoloid. Therefore, Nazi Germany was run by Meds controlling Nordics.
Goebbells was very eloquent (high verbal IQ) and Himmler was an excellent bureaucratic type, with very efficient organization skills (visual IQ).
And I don’t discount Jews involved in Nazism. Nazi Germany coincided when Israel was coming to existence.
I agree with you. It was Meds controlling Nordics.
The Mafioso bosses of Third Reich:
Himmler was just the Asiatic handyman, and he was!
A more realistic (and less absurd) explanation is that most of the Nazi Party leaders came from Bavaria/Austria. Which has a lot of cultural/genetic/physiognomy links with northern Italy. And happens to be much more racist than the rest of Germany.
“Indeed northern europeans rarely mixed with non-european races, while just look to french colonies in North America… latin-based european peoples/cultures tend to enphasize language/culture over race, much more than northern-germanic europeans”
Latin based Europe is the descendant of the Roman Empire. Romans like all great empires spread language, culture and religion. All of these 3 things. Germanics or Nordics, these were the savages that became civilized only recently, and they did not have any significant culture or religion to spread.
I also agree with Gondawa in the sense that I don’t think it’s wise to jump to conclusions without evidence. The only point on which I agree is that the leaders were clearly Mediterraneans and that Mediterraneans are a lot smarter than Nordics, who have not built civilization on their own. Either that, or they are driven by different desires.
Interestingly, certain Medish loyalists are saying the same things that I’ve been saying:
They inject a racial tone that the problems concerning the degenerate/disordely Anglo Sphere are Nordic driven and the Jews are its leaders. Jews represent the Medish types in this realm, because Medish people are clearly smarter than the Nords, when it comes to appropriating culture.
The Third Reich in Germany didn’t wanted this kind of thing to happen to them, and it was an inverse of this. What’s more fascinating is that Nazi Germany was dealing with 2 contingents that were prolier in nature. They were Winston Churchill with America, and the Eastern European-Soviet Bloc.
Meds being socially smarter than Nordics and having more pronounced dark triad traits might explain this.
“Meds being socially smarter than Nordics and having more pronounced dark triad traits might explain this”.
Yes, and that’s why Meds are more creative. Med supremacists believed that Meds get into psychopathic behavior, because it serves a pragmatic justification, where as Nordics are only anti-social just for its sake. A comparison would be the Roman Empire vs the various loose confederation of Goths, Vandals and Huns.
Look at the writings of Machiavelli. All of his writings talks about Meds doing bad things to achieve an end that justified the means, namely power that benefits the masses.
Nazi Germany (which was run by Meds) allied themselves with Med nations like Italy.
Spain could have been an ally, but they had their own problems with an ensuing civil war.
Furthermore, Hitler couldn’t be more racist, if he had diplomacy with Asian nations. The Third Reich just wanted to eliminate undesirables, not non-Aryans.
Stories coming from blacks who lived through Nazi Germany, including black americans suggested that the Anglosphere was more racist towards them.
yes JS all western europeans look alike…to non-western-europeans.
organized crime, business, and politics are all very closely related in terms of the psychology that succeeds.
http://lunaticoutpost.com/thread-785695-post-14688253.html
In the show, regarding altruism Ayn Rand said what Gautama Buddha said in Rājan Sutta: The King: “Searching all directions with your awareness, you find no one dearer than yourself. In the same way, others are thickly dear to themselves. So you shouldn’t hurt others if you love yourself.”