A few years ago I came up with the theory that East Asians, despite being arguably the smartest and most evolved of the macro-races, are also arguably the most autistic. Thus you might expect them to be easily manipulated by the U.S. media into increasing immigration, as so many European countries have been.
My fellow celeb Steve Sailer (Hi Steve!) has an article about the pressure Japan is coming under to accept more immigrants, however so far I doubt they’re falling for it.
It seems big brained East Asians really are highly evolved, in that they not only have the book smarts to ace the SAT, but street smarts to not fall for the immigration con. It seems you need a big brain to make room for both book smarts and street smarts. Or maybe it’s not cognitive superiority that allows East Asians to eschew immigration, but moral inferiority ( a lack of emotional empathy?).
But sadly, I worry that their superior intelligence will cause North Korea to become a nuclear threat to the Western North America since I have family on the West Coast.
pressure from whom? i’ve just heard it suggested, and the japanese are very explicit about wanting a homogeneous society. they don’t want other ne asians either. but the best sumos are all from mongolia now, and it has a few russians from siberia. japan also has the right of return like israel.
according to ken griffin despite japan’s GDP being stagnant, living standards for the average japanese have continued to increase. this is a very common error made by commentators. they identify growth in aggregate economic activity as the target rather than growth in living standards. when the working age population is declining the former is not important. the japanese labor force peaked in 2000 iirc.
my understanding is russian immigrants to the PRC are not welcome. i don’t know about korea. on the other hand i believe singapore and hong kong are very welcoming of immigrants.
few would want to move to india, but i think it was paul theroux who said he had a white friend who moved there and he was treated terribly. i think arthur c clarke moved to sri lanka because he was a homo.
only central asians are moving to russia and russia has its own version of anti-immigration thugs.
a yuge difference between the far east and europe is christianity.
Black Africans who move to India get beaten down in the streets like animals. That’s what I read in some article. It’s beyond me why someone would move from one shithole to another.
Whites would probably get treated more respectfully although the women (especially blonde ones) get molested and raped savagely.
There’s no place in the world worth moving to outisde of North America/Western Europe/Australia/New Zealand.
And I include East Asia as a place I would never move to.
i recall peter jennings (frost back) said his mother was an imperialist. i wonder how many canadians still think of themselves as british.
So two questions:
1. How do you think this fits with Rushton’s theory if Japanese are morally inferior?
2. How does this fit with Pill’s theory that autists are naive and easily taken advantage of (and I actually agree that Japs are more autistic than whites and blacks)?
They have no history of immigration and the diversity of ethnic clans is nowhere close to Europeans. They are a tight island and began isolation in the 1600’s. America was colonized for that past 400 years and the constant influxes and relocation of populations changed the personality selection of those who came to America. Those leaving Europe reinforced the personality traits of those remaining in Europe since they were now interacting less with those people that had the traits that made them decide to leave Europe. Plus that blacks were a huge part of the colonization process where two races for the first time were living together when normally interaction happens at distances of 5 thousand miles. Japans culture is based on isolation and a strict ordering of society that never had huge population movements like in America. European colonization lasted over 500 years with huge population movements and ethnic diversification. Japan still has an Emperor and Europes last emperor died in 476A.D. and Rome never ruled all Europe.
In Europe on average in 2016, more than 1 out of 2 asylum seekers were admitted as refugee after all litigation are over, many refugees get the statute by litigating in Court and not because it was given by the government in the first place, for example in France.
In Japan, it is 1 out of 400. (28 out of 10 500). Before Syria and Irak war, it was 1 out of 600 in average (They gave refugee status to 10% of the Syrian).
You have to know that as their asylum seekers know how difficult it is to get admitted to Japan, their claim are much less unreal than the one coming into Europe. I guess that if they had the same “quality pool” than in Europe, they would admid 1 in 5 000 on average compared to 50% here in Europe (some countries like France admit around 25% but UK, Sweden, Italy and Spain are more around the 75%). .
In France, a cognoscente told me, than in a camp of syrian asylum seekers, two third don’t even speak arabic (urdu, etc) and a big part of the remaining third that speaks arabic don’t speak the syrian arabic dialect (wich is the levantine dialect, who is very recognizable even by me!). Some speak the eryptian one, most the moghrebi.He believes than only 15% are syrian and only 5% may face a personal risk for their life.Among them, many are Al Qaida supporters whose risk comes from the secularism they hate ….
Is this news, people loosing child custody for having both a 70 IQ, true or fake ?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4747316/Oregon-couple-loses-custody-children-low-IQ-scores.html
For each family, if you have 1 third single, 1 third who matches and 1 not, it means that more than 1 family out ot 70 could loose their children ! or 60 000 children each year in the USA. And more than 1 out of 8 among black families – if black average IQ in the USA is 85 ?
Thats crazy.
Well, some speculate the black standard deviation may be somewhat smaller than 15, but yeah, it basically means a large portion of the black population is too incompetent to even be parents.
If I remember correctly, people with IQ 75 only have a 50% chance of graduating high school. IQ 80 is the minimum needed to just hold a stable job in a modern economy. IQ 85 is the threshold for membership in the military. So I argue, yes, adults with IQs below 70 should not be taking care of children. Although taking these children away is unlikely to raise the children’s IQ significantly.
It would make more sens to take care of low IQ children in high IQ families. I believe my father IQ was so high – he was a able to relate distant situations in time or space in a fulgurant and profound way – that he got extremely annoyed by almost everybody. A normal conversation would got on his nerves very quicky. He almost never spoke and when he did it, it was always shouting. I loved him but he was certainly not suited for most children.
I don’t get it totally. I read somewhere that generation Z(yklon) in USA is much more conservative or at least on the right than other generations, namely milleniala. New white Americans have bigger brains than their parents??? 😋😉
Based on your theory southern Europeans who are the most passionate/emotional in Europe will be the most pro immigration but don’t appear to be like that.
I believe that the pressure of echo chambers has been strongly directed to northern Europeans. East Asians may be less emotionally expressive than Europeans but they are even more conformist if this is possible.
(((PC))) was totally designed to manipulate or to convince northern Europeans aka Nordics and Anglo Saxons. If this echo chambers had been designed to attack specially southern Europeans I believe they would be right now just like hopeless Swedes.
East Asia is just like Europe in 50’s, pre- (((PC))).
The problem to be the first
The advantage to not be the first is that you can look to the first
But if east Asian governments want mukticulti (((project))) they will impose it and I doubt east Asians will organize to fight against even I may be wrong. The future is always a incognita. Even about places like Francs and Sweden.
Generation Z’s Social, Political & Technological Challenges
Its not moral ‘inferiority’. Its ‘superiority’ when you don’t bend the knee and join a jim jones cult.
All cults and religions use moral suasion. All moral suasion is easier on people with high empathy.
People with low empathy, cannot be fooled. But obviously countries with very low empathy are inhospitable even to their own peoples. Its a catch 22.
Women have higher empathy. Which usually means higher religiosity.
This is why I call morality an illusion. Just because you ‘feel it’ doesn’t mean its right. Most men laugh at the ideas of most women.
In fact the whole reason men have looked down on women in history is perceived softness. Heartiste is right that the jews target women for these reasons.
So your intelligence is also a illusion
😆
Women may be a preferencial target because they don’t understand male lunacy aa men tend to understand.
Again pill
Your lack of subtlety always fool you to believe that current cultural moral systems are perfect reflection of kindness.
You think this opnness to homosexuality, which is very modern is ‘right’ and then you blame me for having moral tastes from 2000 years ago.
THATTTH MATTTH SENTTTTH.
[redacted by pp, aug 16, 2017]
How someone who say no there such thing”right” or “wrong” can decide what is right or wrong???
It’s not a question of openness to homo people. They were denied the right to be who they are because a schizophrenic divine creepy tale.
Your idiotic and simpleton “morality is illusion” is a self trap you are too dumb to notice.
Morality is illusion
For you
Not for me
😉😁
Thats my point! You think its morally justified that people should change their instinct towards homosexuals.
So is not morally justified people don’t kill you because you are schizophrenic??
Seems you are choleric, this type of thinking is typical for this garbage troublesome temperament.
People, majority, are not socially nor emotionally smarter to deal with complexity, to deal with things that is not perfectly fitted with their pre conceptions of what is ideal, usually a subjective or self-idealism/perfectionism.
What is the most disturbing is anti social or better malignantly pro social personalities and most people don’t know how to identify them earlier or are condescending.
Must have a rational boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. Yes too much promiscuity in the ideal society will be debatable.
A pervasive pattern is that people who dismiss the significance of morality specially the objective one, tend to be morally defective. The same for emotional intelligence.
If people is self vigilant…
So why you take medications?? If it’s mean you are blocking your own instincts??
But nobody instinctively feels angry at schizophrenics.
Im talking about instinct, not morality. You are confusing the two.
Why people feel angry with someone’s about what they do in the bed??
Only poor excuses for the delayed pill.
Ive explained above why they do.
why does anyone do anything in the bed?
playing video games is gay sex too.
How explain Chinese (((communism)))??
I read somewhere that south Korea will be the “guinea pig” of the oriental hemisphere, even that in schoolbooks already have (((globalitarian))) propaganda. We will see how the most ….self domesticated of macro human races will behave, next chapters…
Globalifariabiam work with parochiall minds in space and time. Those who live the moment and the place they are, more than live in abstract/non immediate or figurative places. I’m naturally globaliist or cosmopolitan because I’m curious enauf to search how people and cultures are in other places. And the inevitable conclusion of this honest curiosity is the same/sane.
Off to reproduce. Off to reproduce.
Since ive started my own business i have alot of free time. So i figured id come back to this hell hole of degenerates. For those that remember, my daughter is 6 months old now i believe? im not sure i dont usually keep track. Im too busy working on the next one.
Hahaha. Good old mikey, telling it like it is.
The HBD-sphere’s Number One Mack-Daddy. Don’t spread your seed too far. I don’t feel like supporting your babies if your business doesn’t work out.
Six months shooting blanks is a long time, you sure you wouldn’t rather get a new rifle in?
Haha I was wondering the same thing
i would post pics on here of her but we all know this place is as far from kid friendly as one can get.
Do well mate, I’m glad it’s all working out for you.
Good luck!
“Too smart”, why insert some sort of IQ related ability to them rejecting immigrants when the clear answer is in behavior, as in collectivism which they are clearly generally better at.
If it was IQ, you would expect Eastern Europe to accept more immigrants than Western Europe with less overt conflict or at least retaliation to said conflict.
Also it’s not simply based on the logic of IQ of the immigrants, otherwise Japan wouldn’t mind letting in Koreans.
Also, Between China and North Korea, with South Korea and Japan being the most western Influenced, what exactly makes you think NE Asian being the “Most Diverged” in however way you put it translates to them being objectively “superior” when their societies, compared to Western ones, who historically conquered them?
I’ve also addressed this in terms of “physical beauty”, not exactly winning out in terms of having romanticized bodies.
The IQ gap between Eastern and Western Europe is small enough that it can be dismissed as an artifact of better living standards not nessecarily genetically superior IQ.
HBDchick’s cousin marriage might partly explain why NW Europeans are so welcoming but not sure i get the logic: inbreeding makes you nice to family & outbreeding makes you nice to strangers?
At priori yes maybe because outbreeding make you more different or individual than your relatives.
The major difference is the who controls the media in Western and Eastern Europe.]
Putin banished the jew, Khordovsky when he tried to take over the media. The media is the elite jew weapon they always covet. Its essentially mind control rays.
[redacted by pp, aug 16, 2017]
the american media is in full meltdown over trump’s brilliant press conference. that press conference is why pill and i love him.
and trump is an example of a guy who won BECAUSE he did NOT adapt. except for israel and guns.
the american media is in full meltdown over trump’s brilliant press conference. that press conference is why pill and i love him.
Yes, I previously estimated Trump has a verbal improvisational IQ of 140, but sadly an arithmetic IQ of only 93, so based on a composite of both scores, I estimate Trump to be about 120.
and trump is an example of a guy who won BECAUSE he did NOT adapt. except for israel and guns.
You’re equating adaptability with selling out. I equate it with goal directed behavioral plasticity. Trump’s press conference to me was an example of adaptability.
Where to begin?
My point wasn’t whether it was genetic or not, because at the end of the day low IQ is associated with certain behaviors and deficits at a population level and this shows with GDP, Crime, etc.
There’s a body of literature that suggests that it’s largely the biological component of IQ that predicts important behaviors, so if one’s low IQ is caused by say a lack of formal education, it may reflects more a lack of test sophistication than a lack of intelligence.
Inbreeding= a culture based on extended families and group goals in localized areas, usually restrictive to building modern nation (via ethnic conflicts of different goals or values_
Outbreeding= a culture based on nuclear families and individual goals. Ethnocentrism may very well exist, but these kinds of societies (in HBD terms as a result of their higher genetic variation within their population) can become more flexible over time due to higher altruism to strangers can expand into larger, more complex nations faster.
Interesting.
“There’s a body of literature that suggests that it’s largely the biological component of IQ that predicts important behaviors, so if one’s low IQ is caused by say a lack of formal education, it may reflects more a lack of test sophistication than a lack of intelligence.”
Do you have the source? Also when I refer to “environmentally depressed IQ”, I refer to malnutrition and parasite load among other things, not just a lack of education.
But if you are going to refer to education, that ties into brain development and stimulation in socialization which would effect behavior far more than how high you score on a test.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2017/06/21/an-evil-experiment-in-behavioral-modernity/#comment-63371
there’s NOTHING plastic about trump peepee.
his press conference was him not an act.
again, you’re defining plastic as fake. I’m defining plastic as flexible, agile, nimble, adaptable.
pill’s remark was made by one of the original translators of SZ, macquarie.
he pointed out that mass media has created in supposedly free countries a narrowness of acceptable opinion which dictators prior to mass media could never effect.
that is, stalin’s soviet union may have actually had a much wider range of thought than contemporary america, let alone france. stalin died in 1953, before most americans had a tv.
the internet could change this.
[redacted by pp, aug 16, 2017] SZ = Sein und Zeit = Being and Time. macquarrie = john macquarrie.
i thought it was two rs. i was right.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Macquarrie
it’s funny, but at this point there’s no longer any reasonable doubt. the jury has delivered its verdict. Being and Time is the most important single book of the 20th c.
There is nothing plastic on Trump??
And surgery??
inbreeding makes you nice to family & outbreeding makes you nice to strangers?
Neither. It’s not inbreeding that make you nice or not. Individuals from inbred populations tends to show low empathy both with their family and strangers.
I’m pretty sure that’s wrong.
Inbreeding populations behave more aggressively, even towards kin, but they’re more likely to sacrifice themselves if they instinctively believe it will benefit family members. They’re also more likely to engage in behaviors that hurt non-kin but help their own.
they’re more likely to sacrifice themselves if they instinctively believe it will benefit family members. They’re also more likely to engage in behaviors that hurt non-kin but help their own.
It has little to do with empathy (feeling the other pain). It’s linked to honor (how the other perceive you).
I don’t see anything wrong with what I said.
Inbreeding usually always have preferences for their family members regardless if they deserve it or not.
You guys don’t get the subtlety my point.
People from inbred populations will surely favorise their family members to strangers, no doubt on that. But they would still feel relatively low empathy for them. Both things are absolutely not contradictory.
Look at honour crimes for example, is that a sign of empathy ?
I have known a lot of North Africans and Blacks, and I know what’s going one in their home. When their children don’t act properly, white parents generally try hard to understand their needs and feelings, etc, while African parents simply hit them or threats them to send them back home (in Africa).
Again, which one is showing more empathy for their kin ? The outbred Whites or the clannish inbred Africans ?
Both wrong in different ways, but wrong.
To truthteller,
I think what people are confusing are Empathy versus social cohesion.
For example, empathy in the context of a child having problems doesn’t work in collectivism as it would be an individual problem interfering with the function of others as a unit.
Likewise, in individualism you lack cohesion which in turn increases narcissism over time in a population, thus whatever role customs or guidelines tied to culture break apart.
Granted, being outbreed doesn’t necessarily creates lack of cohesion by itself as they tend to be more altruistic towards broader types of people, but rather in the absence of certain social influences to maintain it.
Very interesting points Truthteller! I need to think about it more.
Seems most people here confuse virtue signaling (but not in practices) with altruism and bad with pathological altruism.
People with high empathy or european notions of empathy anyway literally cannot put themselves in the shoes of someone low empathy. Its a kind of reverse empathy to imagine what someone who doesn’t mind animals getting hurt ‘unfeels’.
Its a kind of fermats last theorem for aspergers people to simulate what it would be like in their mind for someone to feel hate and tribalism. [rest of comment redacted by pp, aug 16, 2017]
They put in their shoes but not in their foots.
It’s more about conformity than about real objective morality.
simulated hatred?
I have felt real hatred.
very hot, very dense.
there is pain.
(satanic images of mass slotter)
(Bloodlust)
I have been highly disturbed by where my thoughts have taken me because of what I’ve seen.
I have self-control but sometimes the feelings make me paralyzed.
(I could never be that way because I would die, I would die before I became that way)
get over it!
I’ve got full-blown autism. I’m full of hate and tribalism. More so than you.
What you’re thinkign about is female aspies, not males.
Well the good news santo. is that if Im right, joining the millitary or a street gang would make you much less homosexual so you won’t be so offended that its your ‘identity’.
I think homosexuality has more in common with ‘occupation/profession’, than blood type.
What I find hilarious is that because of jewish suasion, homosexuals now celebrate ‘pride’, in the same way feminists tell sluts to celebrate sluttiness and I suppose, trans people to celebrate mental illness.
Notice the way homosexuals were mostly ashamed of their feelings 30 years ago.
In time, I expect Zion will try to normalise paedophilia or bigamy.
the majority of homos are still ashamed, if they’re human. milo is.
the reason for the pride rallies is they don’t accept themselves.
they need to be validated by straights.
if you need validation you’re doing something wrong.
[redacted by pp, aug 16, 2017]
the sin is fornication and anti-Cynicism.
sex outside marriage and sex without the possibility of children is intrinsically evil. so said paul vi in Humanae Vitae.
talk about an institution which thrives only when it does NOT adapt…
the one holy roman and apostolic church.
but Humanae Vitae is wrong about abortion and birth control.
there are higher moral considerations.
having children one cannot give the best to is evil. so if you can’t help yourself, it’s evil not to use birth control.
it’s a slippery slope, but not aborting children before the fetus is recognizably human who have problems like down’s syndrome is also evil.
[redacted by pp, aug 17, 2017]
I’m mot ashamed. Ill Smith never know what he is talking about. Isolated …. “insights” or subjective insights but the rest… Only delayed people as Iluminattixat to believe he is interesting or (sick) genius!!1
And yes
Ill don’t know what is real philosophy and … Heidegger. Sad!!
Drunktard talking about self control
It’s real????
And yes he lack in self control when he expose voluntarily its clever silliness with “Heidegger”.
What is the difference between Heidi and Fraud??? Nothing, just one. He was a gentile. But self declared IQ genius here don’t know…
Complete lack of subtlety and just the repetition of divisionist narrative… Endless nonsense posts by pill.
😵😳
I was watching war of the worlds, and Tom Cruise gets into a situation where a man who later turns out to have lost his mind, wants to ‘fight back’ against the aliens. Tom is with his daughter and cannot let that man keep shouting and screaming so he kills him.
In an extreme situation people will commit murder.
There was a scene where refugees who lost family seized his car with a gun, and after they take it, other refugess open fire on the robber.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray-Hill_riot
Read this. Its interesting.
Its kind of funny using the suffix, -phobic.
When you use that, you implicitly agree that the problem group is a disease or great oddity of some sort.
Are East Asians too smart to fall for immigration propaganda?
No. This have nothing to do with intelligence. It’s empathy. Plus this type of propaganda is not really directed at East Asians.
So whites being cheated to exterminate themselves is nothing to do with intelligence.
Hdda are too [redacted by pp, April 16, 2016] to know what intelligence is. They still are in this level AND seems they will stay here for ever AND ever
You missed my point. I said East Asians not falling for immigration propaganda have nothing to do with their 6 additional IQ points..
IQ is not intelligence. Cultural or geopolitical understanding is a real demonstration of what intelligence is.
There is much more to intelligence than “cultural and geopolitical understanding”.
You are very clear saying empathy is not intelligence.
Emotional empathy is not part of intelligence. Cognitive empathy is. In other words, it takes intelligence to UNDERSTAND what others are feeling, but it takes COMPASSION to CARE. Now cognitive empathy is correlated with emotional empathy, but emotional empathy belongs to the personality domain, not the intellectual domain.
Intellectual is not cognitive
It’s cognitive + psychological
The only big difference between “cognition” and “psychology/personality” is the emphasis. The first is about mostly impersonal stuff. The second is mostly about personal and social stuff. The difference between analyze people’s behaviors and machine behaviors is just the emphasis, the task. The pattern recognition AND the judgment is the same. But the judgment about other people is considerably more emotional than about machines or other “thing” stuff. In the brain seems we no have substantially differences between emotional/social and mechanicist responses. Intelligence is the whole behavior. Someone who say intelligence is just the “cognitive” aspect are “autists” and/or are saying that humans are just workers, because for workers intelligence tend to be hypo-emotional.
No there emotion before understanding/pattern recognition and judgment, but is common that is understanding tend to be impartial/intense/instinctive/faster.
Why do you think Jim Jones uses morality to enslave peoples minds, and not logic or tribalism or even economics?
See the collar. Hes pretending to be a priest.
Jim Jones discovered like all high ability psychopaths, that using ‘morality’ was the surest way to enslave someone.
Aristotle made a great point that a substantial majority of the population proably don’t have the faculties to figure out how to unchain themselves. Of those that can, a substantial majority are genetically determined not to be chained to anything.
You are confusing your disorder schizophrenia with morality.
pill is committing the very sin he names.
he’s confusing morality with obedience and conformity.
don’t have the faculties to figure out how to unchain themselves…
that’s right. they don’t have the MORAL faculties.
at least 99% of people are INCAPABLE of thinking in moral terms.
all they can do is mimic, conform, obey.
this is the hardest lesson i have ever learned. because that < 1% who can when they see it become, effectively, misanthropes, anti-social, etc.
but as marion has said sometimes it happens that objections to the truth are not because of false beliefs but because the truth is the truth.
because that < 1% who can (sc. think in moral terms)
when they see it (that they are very rare)
become…
effectively…
misanthropes, anti-social, etc.
in a society of 99% sociopaths, the 1% who aren’t will be accused of being sociopaths.
a misrepresentation by a jew. although a sympathetic jew. allain de botton.
unlike 20th c french “philosophers” heidegger was no more incomprehensible than he needed to be.
that is, he could not have said what he was trying to say with any more clarity than he did.
There is a Buddhist term I remember called dependent origination. Another thing I remember is called Weber–Fechner law, intensity threshold of stimulus and perception.
If I think about it, my body is a system of energy flowing through atoms that stick together and change their arrangement.
Mist in forests can appear and disappear. If you look how ants build a colony this is like how the electric signal impulses change the brains wiring. That then changes where the signals go.
Nothing is static but it has been done where a patient was cooled in suspended animation for surgery and all signals stopped. They reactivated when his body was warmed back up.
It’s like when all atoms dissipate the atoms remain but the signals stop.
The I think “but if I am nothing I am timeless”. External means timeless.
Why not become any time as born in past or future. No time means I can become born in any time. (atemporal reincarnation)
I am exposing my Asperger again by recommending you read my blog post on A.I.
https://illuminaticatblog.wordpress.com/2017/08/16/model-of-cosciousness/
And you are the 1%???
Jews
Most if not all people can think in moral terms. What is correct to say is that most can’t think in very morally correct terms and instincts explain great part of it. Indeed culture reflects more instincts than reason.
And reason is more about what we are wrong and not about what we are right.
”unlike 20th c french “philosophers” heidegger was no more incomprehensible than he needed to be.
that is, he could not have said what he was trying to say with any more clarity than he did.”
bad philosophy = incomprehensible philosophy AND literature, to start. It’s the technical part.
qualitatively bad philosophy = what pill and you say all the time here.
LESS THAN 1% santo.
in the language of mathematics
99+% are incapable of proving new moral theorems.
at best they can repeat proofs of old moral theorems.
but some of these theorems aren’t theorems.
another way of putting it is that when 99+% of people are confronted with evil, but an evil which they have never heard of before and thus have not learned the name of…they cannot see that it is evil.
Not just novel problems (lack of creativity), what I said.
So you are NOT that ”rare breed” that solve ”novel’ moral problems with creativity or with, just, intelligence…
Watched this video last night about Mormons. I spent some time in Utah when I was living in Las Vegas. When I was traveling about 100 miles north of St. George, the Mormons would seem scared of me for some reason. They would point and run away.
Anyhow, the take-away is that the general Mormon public (about 95%) is extremely naive/autistic/gullible/overly-trusting. Paranoid towards outsiders apparently, but extremely trusting of their own people. Reminds me of the Japanese
Thus scam artists/psychopaths move in and pretend to believe in the Mormon faith. They’d manipulate the Mormon gullibility to gain high positions in the Church and then start scamming and/or raping people. Apparently it’s something that goes on and on and everyone is afraid to admit it. That’s actually what Ted Bundy did for a while.
Imagine an entire town filled with Napoleon Dynamites. Or AnimeKittys.
Funny, I saw 2 Mormons today, age 23 sitting in a car as I walked to burger king. Me and my aunt waved to them and they waved back smiling.
The thing is I could not see me being that excessively friendly.
(I am aware of exactly the kind of person who would slit my throat for a dollar)
(I think about torture allot, physical and mental, I notice when something is not right about others)
Cults just are not my thing, growing up the extreme fear of God raped my being, I do not think that because a person is slick and uses fancy sounding logic that I should accept their statements as factual proofs I should believe.
Many here fail to realize that I have critical thinking and follow a scientific view of the world. I am intuitive and socially/philosophically aware. I feel that several severe experiences of traumatization prevents me from just accepting a nieve sense of reality held by so many. I am good at reasoning so I spot errors necessarily in conversation.
(gore and mutilation happens allot in comic books, and existential despair)
(yes, existential despair is what I have noticed in all media I have been exposed to since I began having memories at age 4, Emptiness consumes you and you understand the meaning of nihilism, extreme nihilism that has destroyed people)
(the hole in you that can’t be filled)
(Is Napoleon Dynamites filled with the horror that that life may have no meaning)
Mormons are nice people, it’s nice to talk with them.
Surprisingly I think paranoia is also excess of agreeableness. People who are too concerned about other opinions. In other aspects it’s can make you more correctly knowledgeable of people instead bizarre pre conceptions. Interestingly agreeableness Is a very female trait but paranoia is more common on men, why?? Maybe men is also more defensively and aggressively empathetic (put yourself in other perspectives) than women that tend to be considerably more receptively empathetic. Be worry about other criticisms = excessive agreeableness = paranoia.
Usually most paranoid behavior is triggered by real reasons, in indirect or direct ways.
You see priest castes in all societies. These are aztec drawings. Obviously some explanations for a priestly caste to emerge is:
(a) People were stupid and needed people to make up explanations for why things happen
(b) Marxist theory: priests exist to give reasons why the elite get to use your wife for the night/charge tax/make you fight for Israe….sorry the lords.
(c) Niethschean: Allows the socio-sexual-economic misfits an ideological reason to upturn the alpha males at the top.
Notice the way in East Asia, of all races of man, priest castes were least apparent. In medieval Europe, Latin America, MENA and even Africa, priests/shamen etc were a pivotal part of the system.
If you believe most of morality is made up, which you should, then you can see something odd about the whole thing and how followers must always feel the need to follow.
There is something in the human condition that maybe means most people are meant to be enslaved in a sense, at least intellectually and ‘morally’. Unlike Marx/Nietsche I don’t think religion is completely negative. Even our current judeo-jim jones religion.
Aztec priests demanding more sacrifices, c. early 21st century
”(a) People were stupid and needed people to make up explanations for why things happen”
… needed….
You started misunderstooding the concept of morality, the rest is your endless repetitive and yes, wrong posts.
Morality is at priori the qualitative judgment of the behavior…
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/04/the_left_both_here_and_there_betraying_israel.html
This guys sounds like an Israeli version of Jason. Hahahahaha. Good laugh.