101 thoughts on “Who do you hope wins tonight’s election? Please vote in the poll”
Santo piece und löebsaid:
I don’t think you need moderate completely the comments. Only the comments you perceive are completely inappropriate you need analyze the situation, if necessary before to give advertisements and in some cases simply Don’t be tolerant. Avoid binary approach, before you don’t moderate nothing, now you will moderate everything. This is the classical essential human mistakes.
Yes, we humans often make the mistake of going from one extreme to another. But I think moderation can be good, as long as the person doing it can be fair and balanced. Of course fairness is in the eyes of the commenters, so if I moderate unfairly, I will lose good commenters.
But on a day like today, it doesn’t make sense to do much moderating.
When it’s moderated people put more time and effort into their comments and also take more time to read the comments of others, because there are fewer of them.
I see what you mean, I’d just rather not wait to comment and to reply to others. I liked the chat room speed here. A steady stream of comments is good for viewership as well as your placement on Google so that people can come here and learn the truth about HBD.
Santo piece und löebsaid:
It’s unrealistic choice for one of the little candidates. They no have any chance. Interesting how American “democracy” is a big joke. Supposedly more diverse is the political parties and more symmetric are their chance to win more democratic will be the system. At priore. What we have is the domination of two gigantic political parties which are quite similar one each other and little chance to the other parties to even think to win any great elections.
The “indirect vote system” is other clear demonstration of the alarming ambiguity levels American “democratic” system have.
This point could be said for Britain, Germany and France.
At least they have referendums now and then and don’t leave it to blackmailed, bribed and low IQ affirmative action MPsand minister to vote for more Jim Jones Suicide Cult policies – i.e. neoliberalism, open borders, world government, less civil liberties, more tax havens, lower wages, lower pensions, higher college fees.
You’d swear it was a total f’ing joke what they do. But they literally vote for those things, year in, year out.
Direct elections (non fraudulent or fake elections of course)
Are if not pure democracy at least real democracy
Santo piece und löebsaid:
Pluripolitical
The Philosophersaid:
Agreed.
The Philosophersaid:
The president’s will would be blocked by congress for most things except for:
Foreign policy, Supreme Court, NSA spying, Immigration Control and Regulation.
With Trump you get closed borders, no wars and a status quo Supreme Court.
With Hilary I suspect we won’t even get proper Wall Street regulation and a Supreme Court that re-criminalizes bribery (Citizens United). And of course the supercomputer gets more data, more funding, less oversight and Hilary’s cabal masters keep preparing for the time when they can finally get rid of democracy altogether and implement a World Government.
So as you can tell I am a Gary Johnson supporter (joke).
Actually I suspect Hilary will de-regulate Wall Street based on her speeches, donors and her husband’s Grade A approach to financial regulation (i.e. have none).
With Trump you get closed borders, no wars and a status quo Supreme Court.
Trump’s a huge critic of the Iran nuclear deal which derailed the neocon war mongers, so I wouldn’t be so sure Trump will avoid a war with Iran, even though he was much less hawkish than Hillary on Iraq.
But he’s never said to invade Iran either. I think he would just stick with sanctions. Hilary is against the Iran deal as well I suspect. That’s an awkward position for her – stick with Obama or listen to what Master Netanyahu says is good for Zion.
I doubt Hillary’s anywhere near as pro-Netanyahu as she appears. She’s just so desperate to reach her life long goal of becoming the first woman president that she will say and do virtually anything to get there.
But there’s evidence she’s secretly anti-Netanyahu
Her closest aid looks like she could be of Muslim background, though she’s married to a Jewish guy, though some suspect he’s just a beard for a lesbian affair with Hillary.
Nobody’s more pro-Trump than LOTB, and he’s a HUGE Netanyahu fan. So either LOTB is being played for a fool (unlikely given his sky high test scores) or Trump is pro-Netanyahu.
You can never trust Jews, just as you could never trust Lion, when he says he’s a prole, because who grew up with Staten Island Italians who are the real proles. Period!
JS, you’re one of my best commenters. I’d hate to lose you. But you’ve got to learn to stop making racist comments about ANY group (not Jews only). Imagine if you took a DNA test and discovered you were part Jewish and then everyone decided they couldn’t trust you. How would that make you feel?
First of all, there’s no scientific study I’m aware of showing Jews to be less trustworthy, and even if they are, it would only be an AVERAGE difference. Some Jews would still be extremely trustworthy and some gentiles would still be extremely deceptive.
Lion has an Ivy League degree and graduated from law school — how many proles get to do that. Not many. He’s a fucking liar, but I still like his blog and his insights.
“Not all Jews love Israel RR. Don’t lump everyone in a group together as if they’re all the same. That was Rushton’s definition of true racism.”
Well, most Jews love Israel. I said that LotB voted for Trump for his EGIs, which is true. Trump LOVES Jews. Look at him grovel at the Jews’s feet at AIPAC.
According to Greg Johnson, as you’ve covered, Rushton said that Jews were pushing non-white immigration into the West. I don’t know how much clout to put on that, but Rushton was a smart guy so I think he’d notice that. Especially if he read The Culture of Critique.
MOST Jews love Israel. And by LotB voting for Trump he voted for his EGIs.
Matter of fact, I’m going to write a post about Trump and EGIs right now.
But Rushton was also a huge fan of Arthur Jensen who was part Jewish, so he didn’t lump all Jews together in a racist way, as far as I know. Constructive academic criticism of the organized Jewish community is fine, but racism is not.
Santo piece und löebsaid:
PP or you are very naive or ….
Don’t edpected any study on the mainstream academics and PF COURSE hbd ones showing the possible true about them, many, most of them??
It’s irrelevant if a DNA show “Jewish genes” on me. I know I have “African black genes” on me and this don’t mean i will become hypocritical about them on avg.
If you don’t care about other opinions because less conformity or less conscience that people will feel nothing bad at all, ^_~
It’s not all groups who have perfect normal distribution of their major behavioral trends. Disproportional is only via comparative ways because what is disproportional to the perspective of certain group may be just the normal for others.
80% of American Jews define as politically liberal. A disproportional proportion of non Jewish liberals are ILLiberals, one of the most hypocrite and contradictory people you can know.
Or 80% of Americans Jews have the same behavioral pattern of untrustworthy, mental confusion or proto psychosis what we can see among illiberal gentiles
Or
The dishonest Jew who want dieversitt in all western/euro-Caucasian but absolutely not for Israel is quite common than we might think, =.=
I agree that there’s hypocrisy in the Jewish community when it comes to liberalism for the West but conservatism for Israel, but that doesn’t justify racist statements like “you can never trust a Jew”. You’re the one who is always lecturing everyone about morality. Practice what you preach.
The Philosophersaid:
Mugabe does the same.
He keeps calling me a concern troll because I can successfully draw a circle that says ‘all jews’ and a smaller circle within it that says ‘zionist/fascists Jews’.
“But Rushton was also a huge fan of Arthur Jensen who was part Jewish, so he didn’t lump all Jews together in a racist way, as far as I know. Constructive academic criticism of the organized Jewish community is fine, but racism is not.”
I was surprised to find out he was Jewish. I respect the hell out of Jensen for his reasoning on why he didn’t disclose him being 25 percent Jewish. Because he wanted his work to speak for him and not his ethnicity. You can’t say the same for other Jews.
I personally like Jensen better than Rushton TBH. But when I first got into race-realism Rushton was my main guy. I’ve since branched out.
Santo piece und löebsaid:
I don’t think it’s racist statement even because Jews are not other race and it’s not directly offensive. After all Don’t trust in people must be a common place, know people very well before placed them in the intimacy.
Don’t trust on any Jew, to start, is just the logic conclusion we can do. It’s also a kind of respect because many times the feeling of fear or caution often can be translated in respect.
I don’t think it’s racist statement even because Jews are not other race
You could argue they’re a micro-race. There’s no scientifically agreed upon taxonomy of races and estimates for the number of races in existence has varied from as few as two to around 100.
and it’s not directly offensive. After all Don’t trust in people must be a common place, know people very well before placed them in the intimacy.
That’s not how native English speakers interpret it.
Don’t trust on any Jew, to start, is just the logic conclusion we can do. It’s also a kind of respect because many times the feeling of fear or caution often can be translated in respect.
I really doubt JS meant it respectfully.
Santo piece und löebsaid:
Morality is not blind kindness, it’s the proportionally correct approaches, behaviorally correct.
If someone or some group are disproportionately worshipping against my group and indirectly against myself my moral approach will be different than with someone who express opposite behavioral patterns.
So if some HBD blogger said “never trust gay men around your kids”, you wouldn’t be insulted?
Santo piece und löebsaid:
I thought you’re typically hbd who protect Jews most part of the time.
Fear/caution = respect.
Someone you don’t trust or you have fear is someone you respect in different way.
My sentence you said is not understandable seems to be understandable. Maybe you’re nervous because you think JS is not being “respectful” enough with people who are right now destroying the world of million of people in a very “disrespectful” ways.
Most of Jews in hbd or in surrounded circles remain behave in similar ways, always accusing someone to be “anti Semite”, protecting their promise land etc et all.
I really want the % of Jews who are genuinely innocent about what is happening.
I’m not saying don’t criticise the Jewish elite. In fact we should criticise people in positions of power. But don’t criticise them in a way that insults all Jews, because there are many Jews who would agree with your criticism.
Maybe you didn’t think JS’s comment was insulting. We have a difference in opinion.
Santo piece und löebsaid:
You’re comparing apples (Jews) with oranges (gays).
Other common human miskraes in thinking skills
Generalizations
If gays and Jews are protected minorities, supposedly, specially to the first group, so they are the same compacted group?? If someone offend a gay s/he will be offending a Jew?? Nope.
Jews have their own trajectory or history, separated from homossexuak collective history.
Homosexuals has been truly oppressed in the old order not only while a abstractized group but also at individual level, over generalizations and immorally correct against them.
Jews…. I can’t say exactly the same. Of course I’m searching for really innocent Jews. They exist?
Palsgrafsaid:
Huma Abedin is South Asian (Indian/Paki).
Santo piece und löebsaid:
Trump seems desire the old American isolationism political policy, before first and still before second war world. Big stick only in Latin America.
The black physicists were irksome based on how absurd it is, but the story and effects were great. Less snark sitcom humour would have been good. Its a bit jarring a man stranded on Mars joking around all the time, to largely himself. Although a strangely viable psychological coping strategy.
I must remember to keep that in mind. I must remember to keep that in mind.
they also call states based on polls not on votes. like 1% of precincts have reported in maryland and they call maryland, because they know maryland will go blue. they do the same for the deep red states.
Your comments are moderated now, so feel free to publish this or not, as I’m addressing this at you, not necessarily other commenters.
If Trump wins, would you make an article saying that he has a higher IQ than Hillary, because his z-score for success (as in winning a US presidential election) is higher? If he wins, I hope that this causes a fundamental change in your worldview.
JN, those predictions are very rough. Like if i was predicting trump’s height from his weight, if he gained a ton of weight, his height would not increase but my guess, based only on weight, would.
Pumpkin Person 
I don’t think you need moderate completely the comments. Only the comments you perceive are completely inappropriate you need analyze the situation, if necessary before to give advertisements and in some cases simply Don’t be tolerant. Avoid binary approach, before you don’t moderate nothing, now you will moderate everything. This is the classical essential human mistakes.
Yes, we humans often make the mistake of going from one extreme to another. But I think moderation can be good, as long as the person doing it can be fair and balanced. Of course fairness is in the eyes of the commenters, so if I moderate unfairly, I will lose good commenters.
But on a day like today, it doesn’t make sense to do much moderating.
Don’t care.
Stop moderating comments plz. It’s annoying. Why are you moderating them so much?
When it’s moderated people put more time and effort into their comments and also take more time to read the comments of others, because there are fewer of them.
But that’s precisely the point. YOU CAN’T READ AND/OR RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS IF THEY’RE NOT POSTED IMMEDIATELY.
I see what you mean, I’d just rather not wait to comment and to reply to others. I liked the chat room speed here. A steady stream of comments is good for viewership as well as your placement on Google so that people can come here and learn the truth about HBD.
It’s unrealistic choice for one of the little candidates. They no have any chance. Interesting how American “democracy” is a big joke. Supposedly more diverse is the political parties and more symmetric are their chance to win more democratic will be the system. At priore. What we have is the domination of two gigantic political parties which are quite similar one each other and little chance to the other parties to even think to win any great elections.
The “indirect vote system” is other clear demonstration of the alarming ambiguity levels American “democratic” system have.
This point could be said for Britain, Germany and France.
At least they have referendums now and then and don’t leave it to blackmailed, bribed and low IQ affirmative action MPsand minister to vote for more Jim Jones Suicide Cult policies – i.e. neoliberalism, open borders, world government, less civil liberties, more tax havens, lower wages, lower pensions, higher college fees.
You’d swear it was a total f’ing joke what they do. But they literally vote for those things, year in, year out.
Nations that have
Pluriplitical system
Direct elections (non fraudulent or fake elections of course)
Are if not pure democracy at least real democracy
Pluripolitical
Agreed.
The president’s will would be blocked by congress for most things except for:
Foreign policy, Supreme Court, NSA spying, Immigration Control and Regulation.
With Trump you get closed borders, no wars and a status quo Supreme Court.
With Hilary I suspect we won’t even get proper Wall Street regulation and a Supreme Court that re-criminalizes bribery (Citizens United). And of course the supercomputer gets more data, more funding, less oversight and Hilary’s cabal masters keep preparing for the time when they can finally get rid of democracy altogether and implement a World Government.
So as you can tell I am a Gary Johnson supporter (joke).
Actually I suspect Hilary will de-regulate Wall Street based on her speeches, donors and her husband’s Grade A approach to financial regulation (i.e. have none).
A standing for Annihilation.
With Trump you get closed borders, no wars and a status quo Supreme Court.
Trump’s a huge critic of the Iran nuclear deal which derailed the neocon war mongers, so I wouldn’t be so sure Trump will avoid a war with Iran, even though he was much less hawkish than Hillary on Iraq.
But he’s never said to invade Iran either. I think he would just stick with sanctions. Hilary is against the Iran deal as well I suspect. That’s an awkward position for her – stick with Obama or listen to what Master Netanyahu says is good for Zion.
I doubt Hillary’s anywhere near as pro-Netanyahu as she appears. She’s just so desperate to reach her life long goal of becoming the first woman president that she will say and do virtually anything to get there.
But there’s evidence she’s secretly anti-Netanyahu
http://observer.com/2016/02/hillarys-email-trail-of-troubling-anti-israel-conversations/
Her closest aid looks like she could be of Muslim background, though she’s married to a Jewish guy, though some suspect he’s just a beard for a lesbian affair with Hillary.
Nobody’s more pro-Trump than LOTB, and he’s a HUGE Netanyahu fan. So either LOTB is being played for a fool (unlikely given his sky high test scores) or Trump is pro-Netanyahu.
Trumpstein will immediately go to war for the Jews.
I voted for Trumpstein by the way. If this guy doesn’t do anything I’m blaming everyone who said he’d do something.. Muh lesser of two evils.
One thing you gotta give credit to Obama — he didn’t bow to the Jews.
He didn’t bow down to the Israel lobby is what you mean.
Not all Jews are pro-Israel
Obama basically said fuck off Jews, “enough of your shenanigans, and you folks are just conniving tribalsites”.
PP.
Drumpfstein loves Israel. He’s a big fan of Netanyahu. Of course the Jews LotB likes him.
Not all Jews love Israel RR. Don’t lump everyone in a group together as if they’re all the same. That was Rushton’s definition of true racism.
Also, proles in America are losers and Obama highlighted that. So in summary Obama destroyed America and weakened its power significantly.
Under Obama:
1) Proles are made to look like idiots as if they were for many decades
2) Pushy Jews couldn’t push him to do things as they backed off
3) blacks are all jive talk and no substance
The real winners are my people — the Hispanics.
And East Asians — who cares!
You can never trust Jews, just as you could never trust Lion, when he says he’s a prole, because who grew up with Staten Island Italians who are the real proles. Period!
You can never trust Jews
JS, you’re one of my best commenters. I’d hate to lose you. But you’ve got to learn to stop making racist comments about ANY group (not Jews only). Imagine if you took a DNA test and discovered you were part Jewish and then everyone decided they couldn’t trust you. How would that make you feel?
First of all, there’s no scientific study I’m aware of showing Jews to be less trustworthy, and even if they are, it would only be an AVERAGE difference. Some Jews would still be extremely trustworthy and some gentiles would still be extremely deceptive.
Lion has an Ivy League degree and graduated from law school — how many proles get to do that. Not many. He’s a fucking liar, but I still like his blog and his insights.
Hillary Clinton would be just as pro-Israel as Trump, but in a different way. She would at least show more respect for all Jews than Obama.
“Not all Jews love Israel RR. Don’t lump everyone in a group together as if they’re all the same. That was Rushton’s definition of true racism.”
Well, most Jews love Israel. I said that LotB voted for Trump for his EGIs, which is true. Trump LOVES Jews. Look at him grovel at the Jews’s feet at AIPAC.
According to Greg Johnson, as you’ve covered, Rushton said that Jews were pushing non-white immigration into the West. I don’t know how much clout to put on that, but Rushton was a smart guy so I think he’d notice that. Especially if he read The Culture of Critique.
MOST Jews love Israel. And by LotB voting for Trump he voted for his EGIs.
Matter of fact, I’m going to write a post about Trump and EGIs right now.
But Rushton was also a huge fan of Arthur Jensen who was part Jewish, so he didn’t lump all Jews together in a racist way, as far as I know. Constructive academic criticism of the organized Jewish community is fine, but racism is not.
PP or you are very naive or ….
Don’t edpected any study on the mainstream academics and PF COURSE hbd ones showing the possible true about them, many, most of them??
It’s irrelevant if a DNA show “Jewish genes” on me. I know I have “African black genes” on me and this don’t mean i will become hypocritical about them on avg.
If you don’t care about other opinions because less conformity or less conscience that people will feel nothing bad at all, ^_~
It’s not all groups who have perfect normal distribution of their major behavioral trends. Disproportional is only via comparative ways because what is disproportional to the perspective of certain group may be just the normal for others.
80% of American Jews define as politically liberal. A disproportional proportion of non Jewish liberals are ILLiberals, one of the most hypocrite and contradictory people you can know.
Or 80% of Americans Jews have the same behavioral pattern of untrustworthy, mental confusion or proto psychosis what we can see among illiberal gentiles
Or
The dishonest Jew who want dieversitt in all western/euro-Caucasian but absolutely not for Israel is quite common than we might think, =.=
Amen brothers!!!
I agree that there’s hypocrisy in the Jewish community when it comes to liberalism for the West but conservatism for Israel, but that doesn’t justify racist statements like “you can never trust a Jew”. You’re the one who is always lecturing everyone about morality. Practice what you preach.
Mugabe does the same.
He keeps calling me a concern troll because I can successfully draw a circle that says ‘all jews’ and a smaller circle within it that says ‘zionist/fascists Jews’.
“You’re the one who is always lecturing everyone about morality. Practice what you preach.”
QFT.
“But Rushton was also a huge fan of Arthur Jensen who was part Jewish, so he didn’t lump all Jews together in a racist way, as far as I know. Constructive academic criticism of the organized Jewish community is fine, but racism is not.”
I was surprised to find out he was Jewish. I respect the hell out of Jensen for his reasoning on why he didn’t disclose him being 25 percent Jewish. Because he wanted his work to speak for him and not his ethnicity. You can’t say the same for other Jews.
I personally like Jensen better than Rushton TBH. But when I first got into race-realism Rushton was my main guy. I’ve since branched out.
I don’t think it’s racist statement even because Jews are not other race and it’s not directly offensive. After all Don’t trust in people must be a common place, know people very well before placed them in the intimacy.
Don’t trust on any Jew, to start, is just the logic conclusion we can do. It’s also a kind of respect because many times the feeling of fear or caution often can be translated in respect.
I don’t think it’s racist statement even because Jews are not other race
You could argue they’re a micro-race. There’s no scientifically agreed upon taxonomy of races and estimates for the number of races in existence has varied from as few as two to around 100.
and it’s not directly offensive. After all Don’t trust in people must be a common place, know people very well before placed them in the intimacy.
That’s not how native English speakers interpret it.
Don’t trust on any Jew, to start, is just the logic conclusion we can do. It’s also a kind of respect because many times the feeling of fear or caution often can be translated in respect.
I really doubt JS meant it respectfully.
Morality is not blind kindness, it’s the proportionally correct approaches, behaviorally correct.
If someone or some group are disproportionately worshipping against my group and indirectly against myself my moral approach will be different than with someone who express opposite behavioral patterns.
Even if the group is behaving badly, it’s still morally wrong to insult everyone in the group.
Don’t trust is not insult, period.
So if some HBD blogger said “never trust gay men around your kids”, you wouldn’t be insulted?
I thought you’re typically hbd who protect Jews most part of the time.
Fear/caution = respect.
Someone you don’t trust or you have fear is someone you respect in different way.
My sentence you said is not understandable seems to be understandable. Maybe you’re nervous because you think JS is not being “respectful” enough with people who are right now destroying the world of million of people in a very “disrespectful” ways.
Most of Jews in hbd or in surrounded circles remain behave in similar ways, always accusing someone to be “anti Semite”, protecting their promise land etc et all.
I really want the % of Jews who are genuinely innocent about what is happening.
I’m not saying don’t criticise the Jewish elite. In fact we should criticise people in positions of power. But don’t criticise them in a way that insults all Jews, because there are many Jews who would agree with your criticism.
Maybe you didn’t think JS’s comment was insulting. We have a difference in opinion.
You’re comparing apples (Jews) with oranges (gays).
Other common human miskraes in thinking skills
Generalizations
If gays and Jews are protected minorities, supposedly, specially to the first group, so they are the same compacted group?? If someone offend a gay s/he will be offending a Jew?? Nope.
Jews have their own trajectory or history, separated from homossexuak collective history.
Homosexuals has been truly oppressed in the old order not only while a abstractized group but also at individual level, over generalizations and immorally correct against them.
Jews…. I can’t say exactly the same. Of course I’m searching for really innocent Jews. They exist?
Huma Abedin is South Asian (Indian/Paki).
Trump seems desire the old American isolationism political policy, before first and still before second war world. Big stick only in Latin America.
Of course
Seems at surface 😉
No one cares about Latin America. It’s the forgotten continent.
No?? No by now but Latin America have Amazonia.
Latin America isn’t a continent.
Thank you for this valuable information.
Maybe the steroids…
Invade the world/invite the world,
your workers are of thee,
my bosom heaves and treasury soars
when your yo soy coolies come to me
Invade the world/invite the world
Your mischief against Zion cannot stand!
We relate to you,
In most oblique manner,
Why white infantry must land!
Invade the world/Invite the world
Invade the world/invite the world.
The eye of Zion is always watching.
In Arizona autists work 24/7
A noxious gas of ideology stupefies you
The Struggle of the Will has commended.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
Now to watch a movie. Adieu mes freres. Je ne peu plus chanter.
http://marilynvossavant.com/logical-fallacies/ off topic
Learn them. Specifically, your favorite, learn the ad hominem fallacy and stop using it against me.
Shut up.
Thought so.
That’s a poem Santo.
Its not meant to be taken literally.
Lower quality as expected from you.
I’m seeing tomatoes in your direction.
You was in “altered” state when you wrote this piece of heaven??
Well Kentucky and Idaho are in showing a strong R increase in margin. Good omen.
The Martian is a great movie.
The black physicists were irksome based on how absurd it is, but the story and effects were great. Less snark sitcom humour would have been good. Its a bit jarring a man stranded on Mars joking around all the time, to largely himself. Although a strangely viable psychological coping strategy.
I must remember to keep that in mind. I must remember to keep that in mind.
TRUMP LEADING IN FLORIDA!
Great News!
He needs to win by 5 points to win by 2 as they will rig the election and have illegal immigrants galore bused in to vote for Creature.
Obama is on the record as endorsing illegal immigrant voting. Which he should be impeached for.
TRUMP LEADING VIRGINIA!!!
Check it out goys…errr guys.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/11/08/donald-trump-and-ethnic-genetic-interests/
shut up…
Are my premises and conclusion wrong….?
i want jill stein to win, but i voted for trump. though if he had had any chance of winning my state i might not have.
Florida will be extremely close. Broward county hasn’t come in.
OMG trump just took the lead in Ohio
trump won florida about 30 m ago. this is how dishonest the msm is.
looking at the vote totals from 2012, it’s impossible for hillary to make up the deficit.
Bill Maher was almost crying on his show last Friday with the fear of Trump winning. His voice was breaking up.
i know. he sounded delusional.
this is assuming the precincts which haven’t reported are fairly representative.
but they may not be. chuck todd just said the florida precincts which have yet to report are mostly in dade and broward…so hillary can still win.
they also call states based on polls not on votes. like 1% of precincts have reported in maryland and they call maryland, because they know maryland will go blue. they do the same for the deep red states.
it also looks very unlikely virginia will not go for trump.
If Trump wins both Virginia and Florida, he’s gonna be the next president.
I think he needs Ohio too, at least
He has Ohio in the bag. 8 point lead.
what does the big money say? ES is down by 3%. ZB is up a lot.
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/e-mini-sandp500.html
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/us-treasury/30-year-us-treasury-bond.html
Virginia is a dead heat. I predict a Clinton win.
Why isn’t MSM calling Florida for Trump? Wtf
Maybe there’s a lot of democrat counties left to count
if you’ve played with the map, you’ll see that if trump wins every state he was a ahead in + NH + half of maine, he wins.
a tie is possible, at 269. in this case congress decides.
paul krugman is losing his shit.
what does this tweet mean?
Your comments are moderated now, so feel free to publish this or not, as I’m addressing this at you, not necessarily other commenters.
If Trump wins, would you make an article saying that he has a higher IQ than Hillary, because his z-score for success (as in winning a US presidential election) is higher? If he wins, I hope that this causes a fundamental change in your worldview.
JN, those predictions are very rough. Like if i was predicting trump’s height from his weight, if he gained a ton of weight, his height would not increase but my guess, based only on weight, would.
s&p futures now down by 4.6%.
because there are many Jews who would agree with your criticism.
not true at all. the number of jews who admit to their level of power and wealth is TINY!
stop lying.
gilad atzman and who else? even chomsky won’t talk about it.
Joe klein & Bernstein
Here’s a citation for joe klein calling out Jewish influence over U.S. foreign policy
https://www.google.ca/amp/mondoweiss.net/2008/06/joe-klein-suggests-jewish-neocons-pushed-iraq-war-to-make-world-safe-for-israel/amp/?client=safari
True, very few other Jews call out jews abusing their power but very few WASPS do too
And let’s not forget ron unz
but very few WASPS do too
because they can’t! not publicly.
but jews CAN and DON’T.
TRUMP WON!
He might indeed. Hope Willie’s okay
it’s over. he will win pennsylvania comfortably. reminds of this:
Trump takes the lead in Pennsylvania!!!!!!