A former commenter tried to post a comment saying my blog was worth only $4 a month. Well that’s strange, I thought, so I took a look at the source and I was STUNNED!
It actually says this blog is worth $4 THOUSAND a month! And since blogs are probably valued at ten times monthly profits (though these are hypothetical profits), it suggests my blog is worth $40 THOUSAND!
To put that in perspective, I decided to compare my blog to the Lion of the Blogosphere which I like quite a bit. His blog could earn $305 a month, suggesting a value of just over $3 K.
You know you’re brilliant when you’re more than ten times richer than an Ivy League New York Jew!
Of course I’m being facetious. I have no idea how accurate this web site is, and other sources I’ve looked at in the past indicate the Lion’s readership is twice that of mine. And of course the Lion is partly responsible for my success, since he generously promoted me on his blog and put me on his blog roll.
And of course, both of us are way behind Unz.com, who enjoy such luminaries as Steve Sailer (the man who paved the way for us ALL) and of course the fabulous Anatoly Karlin.
One indication that these numbers might be somewhat accurate is that the Huffington Post’s earning are $31 million, suggesting they’re worth $310 million, and indeed that blog was sold for $315 million.
Of course the Huffington Post’s content is more advertiser friendly than my blog is, but the rise of Trump suggests the culture is starting to rebel against political correctness, and smart advertisers might adapt.
ruhkukah said:
PP, I hope you and your blog live long and prosper! This is a great resource.
But changes you’re making to this blog seem to be dramatic. I mean, moderating all comments? I know that will help make commenters more thoughtful, but won’t that also hurt your blog’s monetary value? (at least I would think)
pumpkinperson said:
but won’t that also hurt your blog’s monetary value?
Yes it will.
But I don’t want to get rich by empowering the dark side of human nature, nor do I want to get rich exploiting the mental illness of so many of my readers.
RaceRealist said:
“nor do I want to get rich exploiting the mental illness of so many of my readers.”
Who do you think has a mental illness.
jeffrey epstein said:
peepee is a psych major so she sees mental illness everywhere except where it really is…
psychology is a mental illness.
Santo piece und loeb said:
“nor do I want to get rich exploiting the mental illness of so many of my readers.”
Pub ”psychology”
Someone who are fan of …. Oprah …. is not in their perfect reason to diagnose other people, sorry PP.
JS said:
It seems like a few of your commenters have more than one account. JV has several, so he adds more click value to your blog.
Furthermore, I think Lion have officially banned JV from commenting on his site. Although, I think some of his readers also have multiple names, some of which could be coming from JV. Maybe not.
Palsgraf said:
Lion is a prole from Staten Island. He’s embracing his proleness!
jeffrey epstein said:
thenceforth all of peepee’s commenters and readers will be…
peepee.
pumpkinperson said:
You claim to have scored perfect on the GRE so you can’t possibly be stupid enough to think all these people are me, so you’re either trolling, OR you’re so neurologically atypical, that the concept of psychometric g can not be used to measure your intelligence.
Either way it’s getting old.
jeffrey epstein said:
as zizek has said…
trump is like a man attending a high-class party in manhattan who…
drops trou and shits!…NOT in the bathroom/toilet/lieu…
DIOGENES LIVES!
let’s do it!
Santo piece und loeb said:
I’m PEePeE
jeffrey epstein said:
yesterday peepee’s blog was worth $4.
today it’s worth $4k.
hmmm.
jeffrey epstein said:
a much better (and much less lesbianic) trump theme song is…
jeffrey epstein said:
i got my head checked…
by a jum-bo jet…
WOOO HOOO!
get it?
here’s a hint…
jeffrey epstein said:
alex jones is very…very…interesting case.
1. alex jones has made a small fortune, i assume, off “conspiracy theories”.
2. he’s not acting. or if he is, he’s not acting much. that guy is who he is. like most “successes” he’s fallen into it…taken the path of least resistance.
3. he often appears to be what the DSM would categorize as paranoid but at the same time not schizophrenic. AND…
4. if only he would “reframe”/”paraphrase” what he says in a less strident/less “crazy” language…in a manner which his audience might NOT understand…
everything he says is TRUE!
for reals mofo!
jeffrey epstein said:
his interview with cenk uygur made it apparent that…
1. alex jones is a nut…BUT…
2. so is cenk.
what’s this like?
there’s reality…and then there’s the grasp of reality…and then there’s “reality” as a mass media construct…
if alex jones had a higher IQ or a better “background”…
you’d never have heard of him…
because…
he’d be RIGHT!
he wouldn’t be RIDICULOUS.
Seth said:
Alex Jones is philo-semitic controlled opposition!
Duh!
jeffrey epstein said:
you’re right!
you can be crazy…
as long as you aren’t “crazy” about the jews.
Palsgraf said:
His net worth is $5 million. Oh my god…
How the fuck does that happen?
He’s literally retarded.
Maybe I should start trolling and acting retarded. It’s better than being an engineer or actuary..
jeffrey epstein said:
infowars.com is #315 in the US.
great for a gentile texan schizo.
peepee is at….
sad…
frowny face…
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/pumpkinperson.com
jeffrey epstein said:
regarding alex jones’s stupidity…
there’s a saying…
God speaks in the language of men.
so what you get is…
1. alex jones is popular precisely because he isn’t quite bright enough.
2. his diatribes can be TRANSLATED to statements which are TRUE.
oprah.com is #3,144.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/oprah.com
it hurts…
pumpkinperson said:
Alex Jones claims to have an IQ of around 140 which sounds about right. Both he and Oprah would have probably scored about 140 on the original forms of the Wechsler, but lower on the SAT because it emphasizes culture and logic IQ at the expense of social IQ. And like all charismatic leaders, both seem to have a dash of schizo (especially Alex) that causes them to believe some irrational things, especially when combined with their mediocre logic IQs.
Palsgraf said:
I contend that “logic IQ” IS intelligence!
A large vocab and breadth of knowledge make you SOUND smart but to BE smart, you need analytical skills.
Seth said:
Jones is a very shrewd protector of his EGIs; his wife’s
Jones takes a demographic prone to believing conspiracies and steers them away from blaming the Jews.
What do you think PP?
Would you not agree?
jeffrey epstein said:
alex jones is mostly crazy, and in a sociopathic way.
he combines a “sane schizo” with a sociopath.
he’s 42 and looks older.
he looks like he’s about to have a heart attack.
so the theory that he’s just acting doesn’t work.
but the theory that he really believes it doesn’t work either.
the guy is just chasing the dragon…following the feeling…
he is what he accuses hildebeest of being.
she is.
but so is he.
The Philosopher said:
Palsgrat.
Having a barbell profile is the worst. Same with quant.
With quant/’logic’ lean (actually micro-logic, as our friend Santo keeps demonstrating), you will make above average earnings for sure but never understand how the world works.
With a verb profile you will have a better understanding of how the world works if you can get access to data and alt viewpoints.
Physiognomy doesn’t lie. Classicists, novelists and philosophers look less retarded than mathematicians, actuaries and comp scientists for a reason. Intelligence is about adaptation to get resources, risk and effort adjusted.
Even that insight could never be gotten by a quant leaning guy.
COG vs NARR Function. You need both. Newton, was a massive bible studies man.
Santo piece und loeb said:
”Philospher”,
you will not pay more attention to their pseudo- analytical precisions, specially your pseudo-insights about me.
Other delusional…
Jesus,
your ”intelligent” design is absolutely Wunderbar!!!
Danke schon!!!
Palsgraf said:
You can’t be verbally smart without being analytical.
pumpkinperson said:
You can’t be verbally smart without being analytical.
I define the ideal measure of verbal IQ as the mind’s ability to use symbols to advance your goals, while I define Performance IQ as the mind’s ability to use objects, space, and images to advance your goal. Meanwhile full-scale IQ should reflect your mind’s total talent for low/cost benefit behavioral plasticity.
JS said:
I think everyone who comments here is smarter than Alex Jones. His IQ at 140 is ludicrous.
Palsgraf said:
PeePee believes in the just world theory. She thinks society is fundamentally a meritocracy and everyone who “makes it to the top” deserves to be there. THat’s why she thinks Oprah’s IQ is 145 and Alex the fish people Jones has a 140 IQ. She doesn’t consider it important that he sounds like a moron and has no analytical ability whatsoever.
RaceRealist said:
Jones divorced his wife last year.
The Philosopher said:
Yes you can, I’m reading Hitchens now and he admits in one of his essays he never ‘quite got’ math.
VCI is g loaded though, so I would imagine he was above average vs the population on math but just didn’t like thinking like that.
Palsgraf said:
I aced the LSAT… Everyone I know says, “you’re a deep thinker”.
English was my WORST subject! But I always did well at math, science, and humanities. English is BS in high school and college! Do IQ tests measure analytical skills? I don’t think so. I know many people who are “shallow” thinkers but would do well on an IQ test and SOUND smart…. Go figure!
jeffrey epstein said:
Winston Churchill once said…
You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing after they have tried everything else.
let’s do it!
let US do it!
listen.
that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain!
jeffrey epstein said:
more true than ever…if you know how to interpret it…
he may have died from AIDS…in 2011.
The Philosopher said:
Well, of course schiz is more interesting than AUTIST. Haven’t all girls always felt the same way?
The Philosopher said:
Jones is arguably the textbook definition of para schiz alongside Hitler.
Look at the accusatory stare, the bags under the eyes and it’s hard to define, a kind of hyperactive restless energy that would make you think he’s on coke (p schizos don’t need coke, except to calm down).
As I’ve said elsewhere, one of his eyes sees true and probably better than 99% of people on what’s going on. He assumes the worst in the elites (not a bad assumption) – they are corrupt, parasitic, psychopathic and probably not even white. They are building a supercomputer to monitor people’s thought. In time they will find a way to minority report and find politically rising dissidents from their online presence.
One of his eyes sees complete delusion and is potent mixture of confirmation bias, rage and anxiety fermented delusion.
If he’s anything like me, he struggles with this everyday.
I don’t think being aware you could be wrong should be a delineating factor in mental illness. It’s the behaviours your thoughts make you do. Many women think they are not a slut and do things that suggest otherwise, being somewhat aware of social expectation (itself a construct, to be fair).
Now you could rejoinder with ‘psychopath’. I’ll have to reflect on that.
I think most people would say Jones has a screw loose. Probably the technical diagnosis would be p schiz personality disorder, but its dysfunctional and psychologically painful for him, so why not an illness?
The Philosopher said:
As a corollary, one can have a much lower IQ than 140 and see things as a schiz that neurotypicals and autists won’t see too.
The key is not taking other people’s frames – women, media, government, preacher etc etc.
Nobody ever got women, money, power or even intellectual worth by taking on received ‘wisdom’.
Half of the development of intellect is merely unlearning your social programming.
The Philosopher said:
Also Richard Lynn’s essay on why blacks are the most psychopathic leaning race as defined by the DSM-IV is compelling reading and gives empirical backing to my claim that the Kinshasa Problem is mankind’s biggest problem in the next 100 years.
It opens a good question about whether ‘path is the opposite to autist, not schiz.
The Philosopher said:
http://www.amren.com/news/2008/08/race_and_psycho/
Now you know why your instinct tells you blacks are dangerous. Every single other race on earth reacts the same way.
JS said:
black Muslim philosopher al-Jahiz in the Middle Ages wrote a treatise that blacks were the best race on the planet: they are the most natural of humans with a lower ambition thus leading to a lower propensity for megalomania (that causes people to alter radically the planet’s demography and demographics). The Arab Muslims completely changed the world.
RaceRealist said:
He has a new book coming out sometime this year. About race and psychopathy. Can’t wait.
The Philosopher said:
That’s going to be a depressing read. I probably won’t get it for that reason maybe.
I have heard anecdotes from friends about western girls that travel to africa on holidays, volunteering or otherwise.
You never hear about those stories in the press. You would not believe it so I won’t write it.
Social media is changing this though.
If people realized what Africa is really like, and why kids are starving there, and its had no real GDP growth per capita for 20 years (which is shocking), pretty soon the whole Complex would fall.
The more Africans you let in, the bigger the civil war in the end. Stop the bleeding now. Eventually people will realise and spread the word. Rather assimilate a small proportion of psychopathic, low impulse, aggressive, low IQ meatheads than American levels. Europeans can’t understand why America is so racist. They will.
Some stats:
– 40% of South African women will have been raped at some point in their life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_violence_in_South_Africa
– average family size in Niger is 7 children with on average 3 wives (by deduction, beta and lower SMV males, don’t procreate = Very intense R selection, hence the muscles and depravity) http://takimag.com/article/africa_on_the_brink_steve_sailer/print#axzz4PS02RwfH
– Africa pulled out of the International Criminal Court because most of the worst crimes against humanity happen there statistically. #Awkward
– Africans are explicitly racist towards white farmers in Zimbabwe, South Africa and Namibia. And in fact create apartheid states in many respects.
– Large swathes of Africa are places where extreme fundamentalist Islam is accepted
– Child slavery and child soldiers
– Backs HATE gays/lesbians/trans
– Blacks especially prefer all other races of women to their own (due to testosterone dymrophism in gender effect) https://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/race-attraction-2009-2014/
That means they’ll be your opponents almost always in nightclubs and offices and bars.
The key to beat blacks in complete aggression and using greater numbers. They are in the West among whites. They’re there for women. They don’t believe in anything else except the Pleasure Principle. Crush them.
agniputraabhoy said:
your points are enthralling The Philosopher..It’s because of the exact same reason women give me wolf stares when on NoFap even when Western doctors tell you to masturbate to porn three times a day..Unlearn Coventional Wisdom..I was unable to “close the deal” with women even when there were lots of kissing and heavy petting in clubs when I was fapping everyday
The Philosopher said:
How does being gamma feel like?
Anyone laugh at your jokes in real life? With a mind like that you should be making lots of money in Seth Rogen comedy writing.
Palsgraf said:
Peepee you should make a new thread for the election and unmoderate those comments. It’s going to be a busy night! You can get more traffic to your blog. Besides, people are going to post comments anyway. Might as well have a thread for it.
JS said:
Well, this blog is more valuable than Lion’s blog simply because it has more intellectual/scholarly fluff. We also talk about HBD in a historical and cultural context.
The modern HBD trend is basically sociology wrapped around a STEM context.
Lion’s blog — he talks mostly about American politics, so it has more of a prole audience like a sports blog. Also, Lion is provincial. He has no insight on international affairs.