Tags
By the end of the 20th century, Whites, Indians, Coloureds and Blacks in South Africa averaged IQs of 98, 92, 82, and 69 (UK norms) and malnutrition rates of 5.7, 10.9*, 18, and 32 percent respectively (see table 2.13 below):

Malnutrition is defined here as the percentage of the population that is stunted. Stunted is defined as two or more standard deviations (SDs) shorter than comparable healthy populations. In theory only 2% of the healthy reference population should be stunted.
But nutrition is not a discrete variable. In theory there’s a perfect continuum between optimum and suboptimum processing of nutrients and each population has their own bell curve.
So if 32% of South African blacks have sub-optimum nutrition compared to only 2% of well nourished populations, then that tells us that the 32nd percentile (-0.47 SD) on the former’s bell curve equates to the 2nd percentile (- 2 SD) on the latter’s. Assuming roughly equal standard deviations, it suggests South Africa’s black bell curve is shifted 1.53 SD to the left of what was considered optimum at the time.
So the stunted children are just the tip of the iceberg. The average black child in South Africa should be 1.53 SD below his genetic potential in physical growth. What about brain size? Also 1.53 SD below genetic potential? Given the 0.4 correlation between IQ and brain size, this would predict IQ would be 0.4 (1.53 SD) = 0.61 SD below genetic potential. Multiplying by the IQ standard deviation of 15 points, this gives 9 points of impairment caused by malnutrition. Adding this to the IQ 69 of black South Africans gives IQ 78.
I applied the same calculations to all the major groups of South Africa:

It is interesting to compare the estimated black genetic IQ of 78 to the average IQ of 85 for African Americans, a presumably well nourished population judging from the fact that they are virtually indistinguishable from white Americans in height. But genetically African Americans are only 75% sub-Saharan, so adjusting for this, they go from 15 points below IQ 100, to 15/0.75 = 20 points below 100 = IQ 80. In other words, virtually all of the difference between unmixed American and South African blacks vanishes when we adjust for presumably stunted brain size.
Similarly, the IQs of Indians and whites rise to their corresponding levels when reared in the UK (a well nourished country).
*The malnutrition of Indians were estimated from the line of best fit predicting poverty rates in table 2.13 to malnutrition rates in table to 2.13: Malnutrition = 0.65(poverty) – 2.79.
Where did you learn all this math anyway. A statistic textbook?
I think he said a member of the Prometheus Society taught him psychometrics. PP was quick on the uptake because of sky-high mathematical IQ.
I had the advantage of learning about standard deviations & bell curves very young because of my IQ obsession so when I was lucky enough to correspond with a Promethean, I had that foundation.
Pepe, is your mental ability profile unbalanced? For example, is your numerical “I.Q.” much higher than your verbal or spatial “I.Q.”?
My spatial IQ is way higher than my numerical IQ which is way higher than my verbal IQ. My verbal IQ is nothing spectacular; kind of like the level of the average lawyer or PhD. My vocabulary is not that high but I make good use of the words I do know. My English teachers worshipped me and my friend’s mother said I was the most articulate person she had ever met other than herself.
my friend’s mother said I was the most articulate person she had ever met other than herself
Are you from The Yukon?
No. Are you from Appalachia? 🙂
define way higher, are we talking 5 points, 10? half an SD? What’s your spatial IQ?
I’m from the Midwest. Proctor detected “extreme emotional sensitivity” during an IQ test? By Canadian standards? That’s like Greta Thunberg being diagnosed as Aspie in Scandinavia, where everyone’s autistic.
I was given the house-tree-person test before the WISC-R (as an ice breaker).
Isn’t that test from when you were, like, 12?
yes but IQ supposedly stabilizes at age 10
stabilizes = differences/ratios between scores remain the same?
What kind of test is that pumpkin? Student evaluation, not IQ? A different test?
WISC-R
Have you noticed your high spatial ability being useful in any non-obvious way pumpkin, perhaps in everyday life?
Would you say you’re particularly interested in spatial “things” like STEM, video games, sports etc?
“One nice thing were the reclining chairs which I figured out how to use immediately, even as most others in the theater struggled.” – PP, AD 2018
also gauging skull size and pumpkin carving
Your long-term memory impresses me. I’m sure you looked up the quote but even remembering it existed and where to find it is impressive.
Thanks, I think that’s one of my strengths. It’s hard to lie to me. You learn to conceal unusually good recall about people, though, because they’ll think you’re odd.
It’s very useful in helping me find my way around, especially when I travel. Useful for taking notes (organizing the page), for understanding certain mathematical concepts, pitching a tent, skinning a fish, sewing, tying a tie, learning to tie my shoelaces before everyone else, folding egg whites into a souffle, rolling a really stuffed burrito, getting a duvet cover on, wrapping gifts, fly fishing, etc .
It’s also useful for certain non-verbal social skills because you can picture what your physical behavior looks like from the eyes of others
Jensen said that g is more closely related to long-term than short-term memory. That makes intuitive sense because long-term memory is needed to accrue expertise in a field over time, whether it’s a specific field (like psychometrics) or as general as life itself
where did jensen say that? Why does being needed to accrue expertise have to do with being g loaded?
Interesting. Burrito-wrapping certainly takes a great mental toll on the rest of us:
Perhaps Ganzir is saying that crystalized IQ like vocabulary is more g-loaded than short-term memory like digit span? Haven’t read any Jensen though.
Do we have any idea why East Asians are relatively weaker in verbal ability by the way?
Vocab is thought to be g loaded because we learn words through inference and not generally through memorizing.
Lynn argues that the East Asian spatial > verbal gap was caused by extreme cold climate where spatial ability was so needed for survival that they actually lost a bit of verbal ability to make room in the brain for more spatial processing.
where did jensen say that?
Bias in Mental Testing (The Free Press, 1980), page 250: “But now we can go further. The g factor is manifested in tests to the degree that they involve mental manipulation of the input elements (“fundaments” in Spearman’s terminology), choice, decision, invention in contrast to reproduction, reproduction in contrast to selection, meaningful memory in contrast to rote memory, long-term memory in contrast to short-term memory, and distinguishing relevant information from irrelevant information in solving complex problems.”
Actually, that’s damn near a verbatim expression of your prospective definition of intelligence as things a computer can’t do. Boy, did I just use my long-term memory or what??!
Why does being needed to accrue expertise have to do with being g loaded?
Strictly speaking, it doesn’t, but higher g levels are associated with jobs which require greater expertise in a specific area. Generally speaking, the higher the associated I.Q., the greater the body of knowledge you need to be able to draw on, and the greater the requirement for independently drawing novel conclusions from that information.
Example: a low-I.Q. job, like folding laundry, requires basically zero specific knowledge and basically zero ability to apply that knowledge in new ways. A high-I.Q. job, like mechanical engineering, requires expansive knowledge of physics, mathematics, possibly chemistry, possibly some other fields I’m not even aware of, AND the ability to use that knowledge to solve problems you’ve never seen before about objects you’ve never seen before, possibly ones you made yourself.
So there’s a clear relationship between expertise acquisition and g-loading, even before you factor in g‘s relationship with long-term memory.
Perhaps Ganzir is saying that crystalized IQ like vocabulary is more g-loaded than short-term memory like digit span? Haven’t read any Jensen though.
No; I was just implying that, since different people develop at different rates with respect to overall I.Q. (some early bloomers, some late bloomers), people might develop at different rates with respect to their subscores as well. In other words, just because Pepe had the profile spatial > numerical > verbal at age 12 doesn’t mean he will have that profile as an adult, and even if he does, the gap sizes (measured as differences or ratios) could be different.
Hey guys, guess what! I caught covid! Test confirms it!
It’s literally a cold lol
yeah, but it has killed a lot of people more than a cold hasn’t it? people are affected diferently.
Indians arent very bright are they? why do they have such serious egotism and narcissism issues?