Although Haiphong looks extremely intelligent, he like Jimmy Dore, has been brainwashed by Chomsky into thinking the world is run by financial interests instead of genetic ones. Good interview nonetheless.
Interesting interview with Danny Haiphong
08 Sunday Dec 2019
No young person in the last hundred years has believed in the actuality of genetics being the great differentiator between people, with economic status being their major outlook on how people are treated. Genetics, like conservatism in later life, is an acquired taste and a very important one at that.
Mr. Random Commentateur said:
“…thinking the world is run by financial interests instead of genetic ones.”
Why can’t it be both?
Mr. Random Commentateur said:
“…the world is run by financial interests instead of genetic ones.”
It’s run by both.
I would posit a third major factor in terms of how the world is run(among possibly more along with several minor ones). So the third major one I would say is ideology( a spectrum of left to right, liberal to authoritarian) which has been proven to some extent to be genetically linked and can be predicted by one’s temperament and/or personality(test). It has been shown that certain parts of the brain are larger among socialists than in conservatives while other parts are larger among conservatives than in socialists. It may well be that like IQ – which is mostly genetically predicated with environment also playing its part – political leanings are also correlated to genetics. One could say that the ultimate battle between left and right which basically shapes national if not global policy is also a battle between personality types(broadly speaking). Maybe one day(in the very distant future) one side or the other will win the genetic/ideological game and we will see a marked change in people’s behavior and temperament and so changing the political landscape forevermore(hopefully if this happens it won’t be at the expense of people’s lives or well being and that we will be all the better for it). As such this dimension of measuring how the world is influenced is in large part color blind but not completely. Note that at the root of it this is also driven by genetics but the genetics of personality rather than race.
Now the interesting part would be to figure out how these three factors rank. Not an easy task at all. Off the top of my head I might be inclined to say that up until now genetics(of racial groups/subgroups) was number one, but we might just be entering a transition period where the genetics of personality/ideology will take the lead. Financial interests have always been very very important but I would say that the day they take the lead is the day we lose our humanity for good.
because short fat s asian men are NOT sexy or good at cricket! said:
krystal ball’s fat short s asian husband:
of course she’s not that good looking.
she has brown eyes and a giraffe neck.
now take truly sexy erin burnett…she’s married to some no name.
Pumpkin, would complex memory tasks get rid of the practice effects from simple memory, since you’re adding a new component? Like, on its own, if you could originally recite 6 digits from memory, but then you practiced it up to 8, if there is another component, such as having to memorize those numbers while you read, would you be able to do the same, or would the practice be cancelled out by the complex task.
Also, does the Arithmetic subtest really measure working memory? So, for people who have an above average working memory, but average math skills, would they get an above average arithmetic subtest score?
name redacted by pp, dec 8, 2019 said:
is that a star of david on his shoulder?
now it makes sense!
he’s a s asian JEW!
like eric weistein’s wife!
where do yo see a star of david? He’s obviously some kind of hybridized asian but not sure if his non-asian side is Jewish.
never mind. you’re talking about krystal ball’s husband, not david
RIP Juice Wrld. The best freestyle rapper ever, dead at 21.
The Philosopher said:
Idiot. Do you even realise how stupid you sound?
Get a life, you piece of shit.
These types of matters are all r vs. K-selection anyways. I would argue that EGI is stronger for similar life-strategies amongst a population than for individual ethnic identities. That enough is true.
Simplistically, r-selected are schizos and K-selected are autists but it is a lot more complex than that, particularly involving brain development, level of competition, and the logistics of survival.
We are living in extreme r-selected times and K-selection only exists in communities that are on the fringes of modern society, like the Amish or Hasidic peoples. One could argue that even primitive tribes of people are more K-selected than the urban societies where we end up breeding people like the rabbits whom the analogy takes credence from.
Back in 2014 I argued autism & schizophrenia were just K & r phenotypes respectively, combined with executive dysfunction. Perhaps way too simplistic though:
Different areas of the brain can be too thin and others too thick. Meaning one can have both schizo and autistic symptoms. That would be the case with me. I do not have images in my mind’s eye all the time. But when I do it is hallucinatory. Nicola Tesla could invent things in his mind’s eye. It was his brain’s computer simulator. When this module goes out of wack things can go bad quickly.
It is a problem with the front and back of the brain. And given two hemispheres that make 4 to 8 modules too thick or too thin.
(The 7 Types of ADD – AmenClinic)
The Philosopher said:
Can’t believe Lion actually published my comment thanking him for affirmative action and civil rights ‘as a black man’. Hahahaha. He’s pretty dumb.
Have some fucking respect for yourself, you low-life.