Because intelligence can be defined as the ability to adapt situations to your advantage, it’s only natural to expect smart populations to exploit less smart populations. In the extreme case this is known as slavery. For example, humans are smarter than animals and thus enslave horses, camels and other beasts of burden.
Thus if HBD is true, we should expect that among humans, high IQ races turn lower IQ races into beasts of burden, and indeed this has been a major theme of history. Caucasoids enslaved blacks, and among blacks, the Bantu enslaved the lower IQ pygmies. Meanwhile among Caucasoids, the high IQ Ashkenazim have arguably enslaved whites to the extent that they have tricked them into fighting Israel’s enemies for them in the Middle East.
There are exceptions though. Whites have higher IQs than Arabs yet Arabs enslaved whites. East Asians have higher IQs than whites, yet whites have never been enslaved by East Asians.
Aside from our enormous brains, it’s our ability to enslave other animals that most shows the supremacy of human intelligence. Thus among humans we should find that on average, big brained races are smarter than small brained races and that slave master races are smarter than slave races.
Of course some slave races are smarter than the very groups who enslaved them (i.e. whites vs their Arab slave masters ), and some smaller brained races are smarter than their bigger brained counterparts (high IQ Ashkenazim vs the big brained white race), however if my race not only enslaved your race, but ALSO has a bigger brain, I guarantee my race is smarter than yours AND that it’s genetic (on average of course).
Yes, being significantly smarter than another race will give you an advantage over another race in terms of technological dominance which will allow for a huge advantage socially. Regardless, today’s whites are basically on par with people less intelligent than them, blacks and Hispanics, especially rural and working-class white folk so your theory is somewhat flawed for modern standards, PP.
that’s fascinating.
what if chocolate ice cream caused AIDS?
would there be a chocolate ice cream lovers rights movement?
or would people just stop eating chocolate ice cream?
Muggy is insane and sttuborn, expected coming from your defective “race”. More white cracker open your mouth more the myth about their sanity and intelligence is vanished. C’e trist…
That’s the problem read too much heidegget and believe yourself as genius. I wonder if heidegger fans deserve welfare care.
Lowest level of pretentious philosophy…
santo,
is justin trudeau sexier or less sexy in black face?
whites do look good in black face which is why they keep getting caught wearing it. It’s also why South Asians are a good looking race. They’re basically black skinned Aryans.
Andy Cohen is another gay man who has a HUGE crush on Trudeau which minister of foreign affairs Christina Freeland & I did not appreciate because Justin is a married man & we all have great respect for Sophie Trudeau.
But sadly this made cohen want him even more.
cohen’s also a HUGE oprah fan & has watched literally thousands of episodes of her show.
oprah interviewed a white girl who put on black face to be Oprah for halloween. when she got stopped by a cop for speeding, he was confused that she was white in her driver’s licence. when the cop learned she was dressed as oprah for halloween, he was so amused he let her go without a ticket. people were less politically correct in those days.
Muggy think i care about fake comunist as Trudeau**
I find his black faces hillarious. At priori, i don’t find problematic white people with black face. The problem is that black people dislike to be reciprocal..
Obviously Trudeau won’t face a huge backlash unless idpolers crawl out of the woodwork en masse during the next election. Canada is only 3.5% black according to the 2016 census, not to mention that it usually is white liberals rather than blacks who take the greatest umbrage at such things. But Trudeau is the faux-left’s darling, so that shouldn’t worry him either.
>Because intelligence can be defined as the ability to adapt situations to your advantage,
This is meaningless pp.
Situations and advantages vary across psychologies individually and aggregated, increasingly BECAUSE of these different psychologies.
Easy counter-example: smart slackers.
The smart slacker figures out how to get as much as possible doing as little work as possible.
Intelligence is the adaptability to use whatever body & environment you’re in to get whatever you want.
>Intelligence is the adaptability to use whatever body & environment you’re in to get whatever you want.
this is going to be unscrupulousness for 9/10 of the american population. You understand that right?
this is going to be unscrupulousness for 9/10 of the american population. You understand that right?
Getting what you want needn’t imply unscrupulousness because part of what many of us want is to feel good about ourselves morally. You understand that right? 🙂
The human conscience might have evolved because it curtailed the unscrupulous application of intelligence.
You didn’t understand why I said “smart slackers.” “best able to do cost/benefit analyses” isn’t “intelligence,” as commonly understood or per iq.
and in fact it’s not even good judgement necessarily. being very easily able to do this can lend itself to making worse decisions in the long run.
If you’re extremely lazy, being “too smart” lets you crutch on intuition and fail later (because you can coast by on easier problems without doing as much work.) This is true for “smart” in normie terms AND iq-wise. Any smart lazy kids know this is true to at least some extent.
best able to do cost/benefit analyses” isn’t “intelligence,” as commonly understood or per iq.
Actually intelligence can be defined as the cognitive ability to minimize the cost/benefit ratio of behaviour. I did a whole post saying exactly this
Almost every real world example of behaviour people consider stupid (i.e. driving your truck into a tree, getting scammed out of money)is an example of costly behaviour. Almost every example of intelligent behaviour (curing cancer, getting rich, inventing an efficient stone tool) is an example of benefiticial behaviour.
The reason we value intelligence so much is because we implicitly define it as the capacity to create value on some level
”Getting what you want needn’t imply unscrupulousness because part of what many of us want is to feel good about ourselves morally”
It’s not just that… When i’m reciprocal to someone i’m not feeling good morally, whatever it mean, because i’m being RATIONAL if someone help me or if someone attemp to hurt me. Reciprocity is more efficient because you’re analysing people’s live’s behaviors. It’s better to defend from threats.
IQ is clearly just problem-solving. No need to be overly-analytical when it comes to that. Intelligence is the ability to use the resources you have, whether it be your health, your time, your capacities and abilities, to your advantage.
Cost-benefit analyses are best suited to describe how effective using one’s intelligence is thus arriving at the crux of what an IQ test is SUPPOSED to measure.
IQ is clearly just problem-solving.
Which is the same thing as low cost/benefit behaviour because problem = cost, solution = benefit
IQ is problem-solving without real world contexts, and it mean, without cognitive flexibility or creativity and rationality.
Put things into real world contexts and not abstract ones and prior magically do better. I wonder why that is.
“Intelligence is the adaptability to use whatever body & environment you’re in to get whatever you want.”
This definition of intelligence has always rubbed me the wrong way and for the life of me I could not figure out why, however it just occurred to me. You see for one, it’s too vague and it really doesn’t do much to tap into the mechanics of what intelligence is all about however ultimately the real issue is that it is an attempt to explain intelligence in the real world but it fails to take into account what may perhaps be the biggest factor in real world circumstances, chance! You see a lot of people come off as successful and by your definition of intelligence success and intelligence are one and the same(a sticking point in and of itself) but more often than not chance has had a lot to play in their success. In the variance of life a good 16% of people are about 3 SD less lucky than the top luckiest 16%(assuming we can standardize it and isolate pure luck from decision making). Clearly this definition does not account for luck and one’s evaluation of someone’s intelligence can be greatly skewed by luck if they apply your definition. This is why i prefer the simple but extremely accurate definition, “intelligence is nothing more than problem solving ability”. We can unpack speed, accuracy, depth and breadth and much much more form the word “ability” while the words “problem solving” pretty much denotes intelligence in action. If we apply “problem solving ability” to the full spectrum of intelligences(even social intelligence) than i feel it covers it all.
As for this:
“The smart slacker figures out how to get as much as possible doing as little work as possible.”
I cannot agree with you more. So much of life is about optimization and EVERYTHING about intelligence is about optimization particularly the ability to extract the maximum amount of benefit for the least amount of work. Laziness plus good instinct and intelligence will put you on the fast track to becoming quite the optimizer of that precious thing we can never have enough of…time. Of course only a halfwit would take that to mean that the smart choice is to steal or cheat, one has to weigh the risk factor not just in the short run but also in the long long run too.
You see for one, it’s too vague and it really doesn’t do much to tap into the mechanics of what intelligence is all about
Not sure what you mean by “the mechanics”. If you mean the neurological properties of the brain, I think it’s best to exclude these from the definition, lest we exclude intelligence that comes in a very different form (i.e. artificial intelligence, alien intelligence etc)
however ultimately the real issue is that it is an attempt to explain intelligence in the real world but it fails to take into account what may perhaps be the biggest factor in real world circumstances, chance! You see a lot of people come off as successful and by your definition of intelligence success and intelligence are one and the same(a sticking point in and of itself) but more often than not chance has had a lot to play in their success.
I can see how my definition would give that impression, but I don’t read it that way. Note that I wrote “Intelligence is the adaptability to use whatever body & environment you’re in to get whatever you want”. The term whatever implies “no matter what environment or body you’re in”, “no matter what it is that you want”. Luck implies you were in the right environment at the right time, but adapting in the right environment needn’t imply the ability to adapt in whatever environment. And having modest success with a crappy body in a difficult environment with impossible wants takes far more intelligence than achieving incredible success with a great body, easy environment and one-dimensional wants.
This is why i prefer the simple but extremely accurate definition, “intelligence is nothing more than problem solving ability”. We can unpack speed, accuracy, depth and breadth and much much more form the word “ability” while the words “problem solving” pretty much denotes intelligence in action. If we apply “problem solving ability” to the full spectrum of intelligences(even social intelligence) than i feel it covers it all.
It covers it all alright, including stuff that should not be covered. For example many problems can be solved by physical strength or physical speed. Indeed many non-intelligent life forms like bacteria are great problem solvers.
Of course I know you meant “the cognitive ability” to problem solve, which is a definition I agree with but find unsatisfying because then you’re simply defining an abstract word “intelligence” by using another abstract word “cognitive” which to me is a bit of a cop out. Because intelligence is such an abstract trait, I like defining it as concretely as possible & thus reducing it to what we actually see in nature; namely, that less intelligent life adapts by transforming its body over many generations to suit the environment (genetic evolution) while intelligent life adapts by USING its body to exploit the environment (behavioral plasticity). So when it gets cold, unintelligent life will evolve fur over many generations, while intelligent life will build a fur coat.
So I don’t think it matters whether we use the terms “adapt”, “problem solve”, or “get what you want” in the definition; all mean the same thing. What perhaps matters more is HOW the adapting or problem solving occur: genetic evolution vs behavioral plasticity.
I personally prefer the term adapt over problem solve because the former carries more evolutionary weight and thus implies intelligence is the ultimate evolutionary adaptation: the ability to adapt itself.
“Of course only a halfwit would take that to mean that the smart choice is to steal or cheat, one has to weigh the risk factor not just in the short run but also in the long long run too.”
Plus stealing and cheating have moral implications on a social scale that become exponentially complex the deeper in the hole we get that simply render it a fools choice.
Pumpkinhead, luck and other traits such as charisma or love or anything of that nature can vary three standard deviations but maybe one standard deviation of luck is less important to success than is one standard deviation of charisma. Regardless, the only thing that matters to success is the synergy between all these traits and how they merge into success.
Looking at correlations does not give you the whole picture, RR or MeLo. Pretty much, many traits will merge together to form something greater than just one trait’s ability to impact the thing you desperately want. Remember guys…correlation does not equal causation.
“luck and other traits such as charisma or love or anything of that nature can vary three standard deviations but maybe one standard deviation of luck is less important to success than is one standard deviation of charisma. Regardless, the only thing that matters to success is the synergy between all these traits and how they merge into success.”
Well one can view charisma as a behavioural strategy and in more ways than one would expect, a subset of intelligence. Of course you could argue that charisma is the type of thing that either you have it or you don’t but i don’t buy that argument, it is only true for the extremes, most people lie somewhere in the middle where practice and attention go a long way towards massively improving one’s charisma particularly if it turns out to be important in fields like politics or the entertainment industry. In any case I would argue that 1 SD of luck in most cases far outstrips any benefits from 1 SD charisma may provide you. Now 1 SD of intelligence vs 1 SD of good fortune hmmmm that may be a close one but i still might give it to luck. I think it’s when we get special cases where we compare a person of average or just below average intelligence that is 4+ SD luckier than someone who is 4+ SD smarter but of average or just below average luck. In this case it may be far more beneficial to be smart rather than lucky. A good example that springs to mind is a dummy that wins the lottery vs a tech genius. The dummy may end up losing all his money in the long run but a tech genius will slowly but surely make his way into the millions if not billions if he puts his mind to it. Tweek the dials slightly such that the genius is 2SD more unlucky than average and the dummy is 2 SD luckier than average i might put my money on the dummy. 2 SD is no laughing matter particularly when it comes to luck. 2 SD might be enough to take you out of the game entirely and no amount of genius can account for what fate might have in store for you.
Of course it’s probably next to impossible to properly quantify these things in the real world as the variables are almost infinite while luck is highly influenced by the choices we make, as the saying goes, you create your own luck(up to a point of course). Which is why I prefer the simpler and more precise definition of intelligence(problem solving ability).
Having said that I think pp’s definition(which to be fair has been around at least as far back as my school days, probably much much longer than that) does have it’s utility. I believe that it is most often used by educators who want to prepare their pupils for the real world and get them to realise that there is far more to intelligence than solving algebra equations.
In any case this is a very complicated topic and I’m not going to pretend i fully understand it, merely that I understand the basics in addition to the fact that it is very very complicated(a lot of people fail to see this). As for synergy, i don’t think i know what you mean exactly, these things are independent of one another but the more we are aware of them the better chance we have of addressing any shortcomings and taking preemptive action and perhaps stacking the game in our favour. Before we do that we need to be able to isolate each aspect in order to address it and while the combined effect may be compounded our best bet of understanding these things is to look at them one at a time without of course discarding or ignoring the rest.
“Remember guys…correlation does not equal causation.”
Except for when it does…that is(IMO) a retarded saying used for 1st year psychology and statistics students. It is for one inaccurate. I think what you mean is that correlation does not necessarily mean there is a causal link.
“Looking at correlations does not give you the whole picture, RR or MeLo. Pretty much, many traits will merge together to form something greater than just one trait’s ability to impact the thing you desperately want.”
Is this another way of saying that the whole is greater than the sum of it’s parts? Well it better be otherwise we couldn’t make heads or tails of the human genome. A lot of what we think we know about it would be wrong while in all likelihood we would be far simpler beings.
“Actually intelligence can be defined as the cognitive ability to minimize the cost/benefit ratio of behaviour. I did a whole post saying exactly this”
Aaahhh pp, I love these creative definitions you come up with(hat’s off, truly) but i still think it is inaccurate and inadequate. Well it almost covers all cases while it is most apt for one component of intelligence ie when applied to resource optimisation. So here’s where i think this definition is lacking;
In essence you are saying that,
intelligence * (some constant C) = benefit / cost
Hmmm so on a scale of 0 to 10 a benefit of 1 and cost of 0.0000001 yields an infinitely smarter person than a benefit of 10 and cost of 1. This would mean that the smartest choice hands down(in our current society that is) would ALWAYS be to becomes hobos or brain dead leaches. The benefits might not be that great but compared to the cost it’s a no brainer, quite literally lol ;p
In any case i get what you are saying(pardon my stringent attention to detail and overindulgence on semantics). I guess assuming the goal is always for maximum benefit the person that does it with least effort or cost is the smartest. Sure i get that, in fact I’m an expert at it considering how i got myself through school and university but then this gets tricky and somewhat paradoxical when applied to intelligence. For example one may reach a point when the intelligent choice would be that an extra unit increase in smarts(knowledge, expertise, skill, or even potentially IQ points) is no longer worth the cost. So the intelligent choice would be to opt to be less smart, or put differently according to your equation the smarter person can in some cases turn out to be the less smart person.
I think the best definitions are the ones that adhere to the following criteria;
– As simple and accurate as possible.
– Can be applied to the most cases.
The best definitions are the ones that are universally applicable and while this may disrupt our novelty seeking addictions(highly intelligent people are infatuated with new and exotic, ideas, conceptualisations and definitions) my sense is that if it ain’t broke why try to fix it.
“Looking at correlations does not give you the whole picture, RR or MeLo. Pretty much, many traits will merge together to form something greater than just one trait’s ability to impact the thing you desperately want. Remember guys…correlation does not equal causation”
I have no idea why you’re addressing this to me or Melo.
I would say you two are the most data-driven people on this blog…nothing wrong with it but sometimes you can make mistakes if you’re only looking at the statistical information and forming conclusions from there…right?
“lest we exclude intelligence that comes in a very different form (i.e. artificial intelligence, alien intelligence etc)”
Haha see Miller’s and Barkow’s BS on “ET intelligence.”
Adaptation is a product of intelligence, and not intelligence itself. Intelligence is what make possible life to adapt and no, it’s not restrict to humans. Don’t confuse sofistication with exclusivity.
So, intelligence is basically the capacity to learn… some to anything. It’s not a definitive concept, it’s a end [adaptation] but the mean/way.
Pumpkinhead, I was referring to the synergy of various things as being more powerful than the correlation of a single thing to the primary object its being compared to…so yes, in short, the sum is greater than its parts.
If you believe that, then correlation cannot be causation because we don’t know how things are when they’re interacting with one another.
I would say you two are the most data-driven people on this blog…nothing wrong with it but sometimes you can make mistakes if you’re only looking at the statistical information and forming conclusions from there…right?
Sorry for the double post, guys. Thought Pumpkin would delete one of them.
Well it’s not like we don’t scrutinize the data that we see. Data just helps separate what’s intuitive nonsense and whats actually concrete.
People enslave animals because of their horrible species supremacist ideals. If people could see that animals the only thing that separates us is our skin colour. I hope to see the day a tiger and little girl go to school together.
Your stupid supposed ”humor” is going not just to be repetitive but boring as hell, but i know this blog is part of your lifelong psychotherapy. I still think castration and sterilization work better for subhumans as you.
ITT: keyboard warrior reaches levels of Chapo that shouldn’t even be possible.
You still ”think” [instinct] morality is an illusion meme*
“For example, when I called President Macron a year ago and asked him to host the Global Fund this year, I had to be frank and say I didn’t know if we’d get the increase [in cash] we needed to fight malaria, TB and HIV. I didn’t know if Germany were going to come in with the increase we were asking for, I didn’t know if we were even going to be successful in getting everyone to the table, but in fact we saw a meaningful increase in commitment.
“I can’t predict that this polarisation is going to go away, but I do predict that the human desire to help other people is not; it’s a very strong thing, and in the UK you have a powerful commitment to that. The Conservative party did preside over the aid budget going from 0.5% to 0.7% of gross national income, which was an amazing increase at a time when the budgets were tight. So while I know these things are up to the UK voters and the UK politicians, I haven’t seen that consensus that its important to help the poorest come apart.”
So in addition to wasting his money boosting africas population, Gates has been actively asking world leaders to increase their aid budgets. Something I learned in economics was that aid rarely actually goes to the people its meant for anyway. And I don’t even agree the west should fund african babies. I just don’t get these people. Some of them are doing it to boost their PR but the people that actually believe in foreign aid must be really ignorant.
What would you expect from a man who adores Rosling’s Factfulness and still wants to channel money to the “developing world?” Of course, that book should only be read after How to Lie with Statistics. Putting log-scale plots next to linear ones is simply shameful. “There’s so little income inequality,” or so Rosling’s lognormal distributions would have you erroneously believe. I guess he’s never heard of Shapiro-Wilk…
Some countries actually use their ‘aid’ budgets to bribe politicians. The US did this a lot under Dulles and in he Cold War era to keep people onside. This ‘realist’ approach Im not sure I agree with but at least its less terrible for the planet as a whole than boosting Africa.
“This ‘realist’ approach Im not sure I agree with but at least its less terrible for the planet as a whole than boosting Africa.”
How dense are you xD. You say aid has to do with bribing people but then do a 180 and think that’s it’s boosting Africa. The only people boosting Africa are people like you. You need Africa to subsist becuase without it you’d be nothing.
You sound like you cant read properly.
I understand what you mean, but you don’t understand what I mean. And that was my point regarding the black hole density within your cranium.
You think they would stop with that tactic becuase they “did” it alot? That’s where your lack of propositional logic and creative thinking comes into play.
Now youre rambling
The only reason white people are successful is because they force other cultures to appropriate their values and behaviors. White people are genuinely evil for that. Other cultures have a right to make a society for themselves too.
Other cultures have a right to make a society for themselves too.…
in their own countries.
if diversity were actually such a good thing those who promote it would also be anti-immigration and pro nation state, anti globalization, and anti imperialism.
they aren’t!
so you know they’re (((criminals))).
“The only reason white people are successful is because they force other cultures to appropriate their values and behaviors. White people are genuinely evil for that. Other cultures have a right to make a society for themselves too.”
So when you crawled over the border from mexico you were being forced to take on american culture? And you continue to live in America and not India because they’re ‘forcing you’?
Sorry, Muggy
but, WHITE HETEROSHIT MALEES already did this for centuries in another cultures…
I do admit to favoring Kenyan and Ethiopian coffee beans, but you can’t say the West would be nothing without Africa unless you establish that the benefits we derive from it are irreplaceable. In the “cradle of humanity” sense we would be nothing without it, but most of the modern reasons have to do with its arable land.
But in most complex societies parasitism has happened within them too.
If hbd think like that , that’s acceptable , so it’s prove hbd IS a rightwinky ideology and bad one, like “libertarianism “.
And… the most intelligent of all interactions among life forms is MUTUALISM, but PP always forgive Oprah.
Intelligence is also the capacity to learn, whatever the stuff. Humans has been described wise by some reason. Absolute truths are extreme sanity, accept hardest facts about ourselves and live based on these
“If hbd think like that , that’s acceptable , so it’s prove hbd IS a rightwinky ideology and bad one, like “libertarianism “.”
I mean, look at the policy suggestions from Herrnstein and Murray. We’ve known that “HBD” is a right wing ideology for decades.
I know HBD Chick love to say ”hbd is not a thing, not a ideology”.. It’s so conservative… they believe conservatism and capitalism are just natural things and that alternative societies are not..
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/18/climate-crisis-seen-as-most-important-issue-by-public-poll-shows
I think climate change is a legitimate thing. If the majority of scientists and scientific organisations all agree climate change is man made and is a priority, then I believe it. I just don’t see why these people would all lie about noticing the exact same phenomenon.
Making up a phenomenon to believe in requires a higher burden of proof than simply denying something is real (e.g. race denialists). The scientists or politicians pushing climate change don’t make any money or get power off it like traditional cults.
So you don’t believe lion’s theory that the world is run by SWPLs who push climate change as a part of their new age religion that they believe in because other SWPLs believe in it?
I believe in it yeah. Based on the current consensus globally. Put it like this. I would now need a stronger reason to not.
pill’s autism is almost as sad as LOADINMYPANTS’s.
”people love to believe they’re morally superior”
you to BELIEVE you’re morally superior..
but
you, as a imature creature, don’t know what is it
Read the latest issue of the economist. Theres a good historical piece on the history of how scientists knew about climate change. It might change your mind
SWPLs?
It stands for Stuff White Peoole Like. It was a web site mocking the cultural preferences of professional whites but lion uses it as a term to describe those whites, they’re SWPLs.
In my opinion lion uses the SWPL vs prole distinction to deflect from the Jew vs gentile one
It becomes pretty obvious if you look at historical data for where you live and compare it to the weather now. And if you’re old enough you can sorta sense the changes.
I’ll bet you’ve noticed that London summers are warmer and sunnier than they used to be. 35C heatwaves seem like an annual occurrence now.
”Because intelligence can be defined as the ability to adapt situations to your advantage, it’s only natural to expect to smart populations to exploit less smart populations. In the extreme case this is known as slavery. For example, humans are smarter than animals and thus enslave horses, camels and other beasts of burden.”
Humans, i mean, not all, but the best, evolved to be capable to reach WISDOM. But someone who love Oprah, i don’t know if you’re capable to understand what it mean.
”Thus if HBD is true, we should expect that among humans, high IQ races turn lower IQ races into beasts of burden, and indeed this has been a major theme of history. Caucasoids enslaved blacks, and among blacks, the Bantu enslaved the lower IQ pygmies. Meanwhile among Caucasoids, the high IQ Ashkenazim have arguably enslaved whites to the extent that they have tricked them into fighting Israel’s enemies for them in the Middle East.”
Change this stupid ”HIGH LOW IQ RACES” to ”HETEROSSEXUAL TOCHIC MEALES”… much more precise.
”There are exceptions though. Whites have higher IQs than Arabs yet Arabs enslaved whites. East Asians have higher IQs than whites, yet whites have never been enslaved by East Asians.”
How ”arabs” enslaved ”whites”*
”Aside from our enormous brains, it’s our ability to enslave other animals that most shows the supremacy of human intelligence. Thus among humans we should find that on average, big brained races are smarter than small brained races and that slave master races are smarter than slave races.”
So PP is a german guy who have on obsession to Oprah and another black famous people and write such simpleton and crude thing like if s/he has writing a poetry about love…
Wisdom is the blueprint, aka genetics, being imprinted onto environment and life experiences. Your genes and psychology predispose you to specific actions, then you turn those specific actions into crystallized pieces of knowledge about the world according to your life experiences. Easy to think about, Santo.
Not just that… there is a hierarchy of knowledges.
What i said in another comment.
Wisdom = / = aging… Older people is not substantially wiser than others.
Conclusion
”high iq races” are better to be parasites than ”low iq races”. Am i right*
That seems to be the implicit conclusion.
But PP like to play with words and give neutral to positive true-euphemisms to talk about parasitical behaviors.
Every intellectual step PP does here is to defend about Oprah.
More or less. It’s just another situation that higher-IQ people are better able to adapt to and exploit.
Intelligence is the efficience to reach given goal…
Wisdom is the capacity to reach the essential about any goal..
The smarter do very well an admission exame to pass to university
The wise ask why, if the method is the best, etc..
The knowledge is not just to do things properly but ask their real ends.
The liberals are correct about gun control and 90% of environmental issues.
Gun control??? It’s obvious that guns should be spread out amongst non retarded whites. Heavier armaments (more destructive armaments) like submarines, ai death machines/drones, missiles and jet fighters/bombers should be regulated and owned by co-operatives. Who’s healthy and who’s retarded should be judged democratically. It’s not the weapon but the person, duh!
Do you even understand what youre saying?
Is a schizophrenic with paranoid delusions and an above-average IQ retarded in your opinion? Might want to modify that statement…
They’re good at pointing out problem areas but they always use misleading statistics or just make the numbers up entirely. The case for action is always different or much weaker than they describe.
The brain is adapted for understanding how things move. (basic causality)
Those that have the most intelligence are capable of understanding the greatest variety of motion. (cause and effect)
Brains can be specialized to understand specific patterns of motion. this can be exploited by them.
Intelligence is exploiting the environment through a superior understanding of its causality in your favor.
Why did you moderate my endorsement of [redacted by pp, sept 20, 2019]
Because it wasn’t sincere
The brains nervous system works in three ways.
perception
imagination (simulation)
action
cause and effect follows from all three
What determines if the brain can adapt is the way it folds back into itself (recurrency)
Folding back inwards allows learning thinking and contemplation.
Abstraction comes from socialization from birth. Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. (assimilation and accommodation)
Maybe we can make a deal where they emancipate their slaves and we buy their oil at highly inflated prices?
so those online tests can compare the people who take them with each other, but it can’t compare them with people in general.
Absolute mindfuck isn’t it, Ian?
the SAT etc. can compare to general population because so much is known about the people who take the SAT.
what is known about the people who take these online IQ tests?
nothing.
”so those online tests can compare the people who take them with each other, but it can’t compare them with people in general.”
INCREDIBLE INSIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!
Or it’s just your brain exercise for dying elderly white trash people..
I’ve taken the SAT. If you took the time to read some of my comments, you’d realize I actually did very well compared to my peers on the SAT, scoring a 730 in CR and a 710 in math.
Of course, the ability to extrapolate anything meaningful from any test is always a problem we encounter because what’s relevant to someone’s intelligence is a problem that has been there for a long time.
I guess it all comes down to what is exactly being tested and how much of it correlates with overall ability and I understand that’s been the overall theme of this blog but maybe one day we’ll find something that we all agree on and go from there…
what year did you score 1440 on the SAT?
2014.
I think I scored a 630 on Writing as well though it doesn’t seem like that portion of the test ever mattered to anyone haha. So a composite score of 2070 was what I ended up with.
Yep. But how strong the evidence that they’re measuring IQ is depends on the test. All of the ones that have automated scoring are BS. Many “high-range” tests do not have an adequate amount of data for validation against traditional tests, but there are some that appear to correlate well with timed tests and have high split-half reliability. Dr. Jouve had over 300 submissions on many of his tests, which didn’t seem to impact correlations.
However, they would not fare quite as well in the general population for multiple reasons. Just try to get decent statistics out of a test that the average person scores 1/50 or 5/50 on. At least most of the ones I’ve taken have scored within 4 points of my Wechsler IQ. But that’s just anecdata…
https://theintercept.com/2019/09/13/velho-oeste-eua-extrema-direita/
I thought Portland was super progressist…
Use google translator
Elimination of smallpox
EMPATHY is soooooo good
Isn’t Pill*
Y-chromosome might be a factor in white peoples’ success, Billy. I mean, they have the most diversity in terms of genetic factors. That’s what makes them so powerful, Pill.
But that’s also why that gives Jews the same power as whites because there’s a diversity in personalities from the Jews and whites. All other cultures are very conformist and don’t know how to adapt to changing times as fast as whites and Jews do.
I mean, no matter what, whites and Jews have always kept advancing their cultures and changing with the times. That’ a powerful tool to have under your belt if you think about it.
I dunno, Pumpkin, what are your thoughts on Trudeau?
Questioning the intelligence of those who you decide to put in your mouth and associate with only ends up helping question your intelligence. Bright people don’t associate with people they don’t consider bright. I think we’ve lost the ability to actually rationalize that.
White people aren’t going to stay the same forever! Sometimes, change can be good and other times bad. Timing has everything to do with it.
White kids love rap music. If it was up to them, Travis Scott would be President and Kanye West the VP.
That’s why i no have kids
Arabs are “whites” even if you hate them. If they are not, then Greeks, Italians and Iberians also are not

Puppy once said southern Europeans were inferior to northern Europeans.
Actually most “arab people , you mean from arabian peninsula, seems somewhat mixed. Yes, caucasian, originally.
You take extremes… Nordics basically no have middle eastern haplogroups, i thought.
Clusters. See Bosporus, Caucasus and Mediterranean for details. Distance between points assigned to different clusters is not necessarily superior to points of the same cluster. That being said, certain Mediterranean populations are best described as intermediate.
Possible however that phenotype is not distributed in the same way as genotype, perhaps due to adaptation to local environment.
Yes, i really don’t know the difference between hapl and clusters.
Haplogroups refer to a group of variants that are together inherited from a parent. Typically, one is speaking either of Y-haplogroups (agnatic, carried along Y-chromosome, only possessed by males) or mitochondrial haplogroups (enatic, since mtdna is inherited from mother, possessed by both males and females).
Clusters are an abstract concept referring basically to natural groups. The concept of clustering can be applied to many different tasks, for instance, one could find the clustering for patterns of camouflage, based on their colouring, shapes, origin, etc. Clustering algorithms can either assign membership to a single cluster or create probabilities of membership to various different clusters.
When applied to genetic variation one is typically making clusters out of autosomal variation, which is to say looking at some set of autosomal variants and using an algorithm in order to determine if those variants form natural groupings.
One could also make clusters of mtdna frequencies, cranial measurements, ect.
Yes, thanks for the lesson!
I already had read about it but i just can’t fixed this sort of knowledge in my mind. I find interesting but not motivated neither capable to memorize it.
Italians do t look noticeably Arab or north African. I went on holiday to Sicily this year and most people I saw were definitely lighter skinned than beavers or arabs.
Berbers#
idiot!
caucasian != white.
“white” has come to mean european.
even if you have red hair and freckles…if you’re a syrian you’re not “white”.
even if you’re a swarthy greasy mezzogiornese, you’re white.
”idiot!
caucasian != white.
“white” has come to mean european.
even if you have red hair and freckles…if you’re a syrian you’re not “white”.
even if you’re a swarthy greasy mezzogiornese, you’re white.”
=
IDEOLOGY
retard
PP,
why you don’t take some RR articles and refute them*
It would be interesting, different than what you has done in this blog.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/09/15/the-burakumin-and-the-koreans-the-japanese-underclass-and-their-achievement/
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/09/15/just-so-stories-the-brain-size-increase/
”In theories of brain evolution, the concept of evolutionary progress finds implicit expression in the analysis of brain-size differences and presumed grade shifts in allometric brain/body size trends, in theories of comparative intelligence, in claims about the relative proportions of presumed advanced vs. primitive brain areas, in estimates of neural complexity, including the multiplication and differentiation of brain areas, and in the assessment of other species with respect to humans, as the presumed most advanced exemplar. Most of these accounts in some way or other are tied to problems of interpreting the correlates of brain size. The task that follows is to dispose of fallacious progressivist notions hidden in these analyses without ignoring the questions otherwise begged by the many enigmatic correlations of brain size in vertebrate evolution.”
from https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/09/15/just-so-stories-the-brain-size-increase/
Interesting how people who write in such tortuous way use A LOT of adjectives..
Seems a fundamental trick to verborragic texts
View at Medium.com
RR,
Do you really read this gigantic article**
rr’s “IQ” is a straw man.
but HBDers are straw men.
because marketing…dumb people use “IQ” to mean one’s innate ability, the ultimate reification via advertising and promotion and ideology.
in reality the large battery is the single best operationalization of the everyday phenomenon of smart vs dumb.
but because it’s the single best doesn’t mean it doesn’t suck.
for example: the ravens is not an IQ test, even though it calls itself an IQ test, because it’s not a battery. it has one subtest, matrices.
[redacted by pp, sept 20, 2019].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operationalization
Stupid people as you always think ideologically and specially when deny it
The problem with Iain’t Shit is that he’s always thinking so rigidly. Realize something, Iain’t Shit…things, especially the meaning of things, change. That means when an IQ test is thought of, it doesn’t necessarily have to correspond to or behave the way any other IQ test in the past has.
Things evolve, things change. That’s exactly where Iain’t Shit has his biggest problems recognizing stuff.
Muggy have a kind of brain defect prevent him to have a self awareness.
Biggest Monkey IQ ever
what are the main points munchkin?
I don’t want to read another yuge article “””debunking” iq. taleb is the smartest anti-iq critic who isnt a psychometrician and almost everything he said was either retarded or false. should i expect this article to be different?
”what are the main points munchkin?”
Maybe i will try to catch them. Boring as hell, overly developed to answer a single answer, we already know what.
The strongest point for ”IQ measure intelligence.. or aspects of it” is
vocabulary
It’s super difficult if not impossible for people improve their vocabulary [in first language .. ]. And it’s quite stable.
The main bottleneck that people seem to encounter on word definition tests (like VC or VKN) is concept formation. The words themselves aren’t too esoteric, but the tricky part is defining them without self-reference.
skimmed against my better judgement.
“Examples of systematic differences among testees are gender, ethnic background, social class and self-confidence. The assumption that these would have no impact on the correlations between IQ and job performance is an extreme one.”
Not an extreme assumption at all. Phd in quantum chem yet still a moron wrt psychometrics
The question for IQ is whether systemic error = measurement variance across given groups. If the correlations differ by group that doesn’t say anything about whether measurement error is systemic. The fact that measurement invariance exists across race shows this pt is 110% retarded anyway
If RR really finds this compelling it just proves s Italians are non-white.
Smartly distractive article, isn’t*
To verbally smarter people and with progressive ideology above progressive ideals, believe they are reading a full refutation about IQ.
The question about IQ start with verbal tests. If most or great majority of human beings since childhood can’t super improve their vocabulary and grammatic skills, so it’s mean ”something”…
In fact, HBD is a rightist ideology, a combination of some progressivism indirectly via libertarianism and social darwinism. Sympathetic and bright Hbd chick IS NOT a representative of average hbd-person.
BUT… it’s doesn’t mean racial differences in behavior and intelligence are fabricated lies to justify rich people and capitalism as people as RR think…
We have facts. And we can use them correctly or not.
Knowing blacks on avg, are not equally suited to technological-antropomorphic environments, don’t mean governments must stop to reparate historical injustices. And even, can be possible egalitarian eugenics.
”Terman’s doctoral thesis was titled Genius and stupidity: a study of some of the intellectual processes of seven “bright” and seven “stupid” boys. Terman believed IQ was inherited, and that it was the strongest predictor of an individual’s success in life.”
IQ [cultural specific skills] is not inherited BUT the variable potential to reach them, also know as semantic memory//general knowledge… is…
Steve sailer seems to get better and better every year. But he’s very sarcastic now. Newer readers wont be able to read between the lines.
Very low taste.. expected
For example, the democrat policy on car emission standards made sense but Trump had to get rid of it even though carmakers were fine with it.
I would say Trump doesn’t believe in climate change which is fine. But he should say it. A lot of people do believe in it such as myself.
Not everything liberals say is stupid.
how ’bout the possibility that everything the warmists say is true except that…
it’s an emergency.
that is, they say it’s an emergency but it’s not.
Credible evidence it will be and or we cant take the risk it might or might not be.
Chanda Chisala has an interesting piece in Unz about why Harvard is justified in discriminating against East Asians. It’s poorly written, and it’s obvious she doesn’t know the first thing about statistics, but she raises some interesting points.
One of them is that Asians are generally less creative than whites. Based on personal experience, I agree. Whenever I ask Asians about politics, I almost always get a CliffsNotes summary of their party’s talking points (usually the Democratic Party). And they generally refuse to think cynically, unless it’s about a possible conspiracy against them (i.e. the “bamboo ceiling”). And when they answer test questions and case interview questions, they usually just regurgitate frameworks.
She also mentions that East Asians reach their cognitive potential earlier than whites do. I’ll check to see if PP has commented on this.
I didn’t finish the article, so I don’t know exactly what her case for discrimination against them is, but the fact that they’re let in at lower numbers than their test scores suggest doesn’t really bother me.
In American universities, at least, East Asians start their own clubs and generally only associate with Their Own People. The exchange student East Asians don’t even treat members of other races like humans.
They generally add nothing to their college’s community, and make it seem more foreign to everyone else.
Many people who support anti-East-Asian discrimination at elite schools have a vested genetic interest in doing so. Maybe their children aren’t high-achieving enough in the sense of test scores and grades to stand a chance in a meritocratic system, or maybe they have no children and simply want to curry favor with those in such an uncomfortable position. For some this may even be an example of “altruistic” in-group bias that, on average, favors their race.
If colleges genuinely cared about creativity, they would administer something like the TTCT alongside tests of academic achievement. The purpose of higher education should be higher education, not replacing the old guard with a easily-socialized posse of conformists. Although Asians are generally more conformist than non-Asians, a focus on achievement to the exclusion of social activities is detrimental to the school’s reputation in non-academic circles.
Oh, and before you ask, I’m not Asian.
Pretty much agree. Didn’t mean to imply that I like the current system.
However I think most of the support for affirmative action—and by extension Asian discrimination—is ideological. The supporters are mostly well-meaning folks who think they’re leveling the playing field for blacks and browns.
There IS a non-ideological, genetically-motivated aspect to it, too. And a lot of it’s pushed by well, (((you know))). But it’s a minority.
Affirmative action is not related with anti asian discrimination. The first is about to combat social and historical injustice. The second is to promote. And non hisp whites also have been strongly discriminated by rich jews. But … rich non hisp non jewish whites do this against smarter midd class and working class aryans for long time.
The Chisala may make some sense. It’s would prove jewish elites knows “hbd ” and use it secretly.
AA indirectly leads Asian discrimination. If you raise the admissions rates of some groups above their test-predicted levels, you have to lower the rates of other groups below theirs’ (i.e. asians).
And you’re right about rich whites screwing over poor whites. I was speaking about group numbers as a whole.
one way to put it for dumb people like rr…even joe rogan unnuhstans…
you can be smart and score not very high on an IQ test.
BUT…
you cannot not be smart and score very high on an IQ test.
And you can be retarded and score very high on IQ, like you.
anthropogenic global warming is NOT an emergency.
deforestation is!
so called “bio-diversity” is a good thing because drugs.
so many drugs have come from nature.
”so many drugs have come from nature.”
you, for example.
”anthropogenic global warming is NOT an emergency.
deforestation is!”
one thing cause another… stupid.
PP is your savior
HEIL, PP
global warming does NOT cause deforestation [redacted by pp, sept 20, 2019].
fewer trees does.
deforestation is caused almost entirely by clearing for farming and ranching. oil palm plantations are farms.
[redacted by pp, sept 20, 2019].
only a small % of deforestation is due to harvesting timber.
– alcoholism
– closet-gayism
– reading too much Heidegger
– be a nazi
why don’t grabblers tell us that smoking is an equally valid orientation?
why does AIDS research get more funding than smoking related cancer research?
why is there no smokers rights movement as big and infuential as the gay rights movement? there are a lot more smokers than fags.
how is smoking fags different from…
smoking fags?
YOUR OBSESSION
BE FREE, MUGGY cracker!!! BE FREE!!!
All people of this blog know you’re closette
projection isn’t just a river in egypt.
bodybuilding is the only thing which might be gay-er than actual gay sex.
this is how you know rr is NOT italian.
franco was sardinian.
big diff.
I know you have GOOD TASTE for MEN
than for women…
”how is smoking fags different from…
smoking fags?”
Do you find it funny**
Do you have friends**
that is, too many people. the same cause of overfishing. but then the same people who are smart enough to realize they need “child credits” are exactly the people who should be having children. the right to reproduce oneself is not a fundamental human right. but any government powerful enough to control how many and to whom is a threat to capital’s hegemony. the PRC’s one child policy —> the greatest economic success story ever.
So, Crispin Blunt MP feels hurt because laws proscribing amyl nitrate [sic] (or ‘poppers’) would criminalise the entire gay community. … I would have thought that the requirement for amyl nitrate to relax the sphincter muscle and lube to accommodate entry was God’s way of telling you that what you’re about to do is unnatural and perverse. Or your body’s way of telling you – your call. So eeeeuw. … Crispin and others can always use a jemmy [crowbar] instead.
check out how much tfr differs from one shithole state to another. and if anything the more muslim states actually have lower tfrs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India_by_fertility_rate
WOW!!!!!
INCREDIBLE CATCH, MUGGY!!!!
Nobody knew about it!!!!
AND AND AND
retarded muggy think ”one child policy” was great..
expected coming from a sub-human..
That’s why IQ-ideology must go. How many stupid people with [seems] very high IQ as muggy benefit from this ideology that stupidly analyzes intelligence *
China and any demographic explosion is a crime against humanity and environment.
Would be great if China decided to control its demographics without millions of abortion ~250 million ones, BEFORE its demographic explosion from 50’s and 60’s.
Palliative is never better than preventive.
Two INSIGHTS right there:
”homossexual males are more likely to contract hiv”
nobody knew
”MEAT business is one of the fundamental reasons to deforestation and climate changes”
nobody knew, just every vegan and ”animal” right activists..
Unfortunately, homossexuals/ lgbt, on avg, are victim from nonexistence of real culture and communities which help them/US to avoid risk-behaviors, build mostly healthy relationships. I’m a minority among minority, but it would happen in any identity i could.
Most so called ”lgbt activists” are what ”we” expected from activists: highly energetic, lower on true intelligence or knowledge.
AND also, because there are surprinsingly, not lower rates of toxic masculinity in many homossexual individuals.
notice “black heterosexual men” are on the list but “white heterosexual men” are not.
because downlow.
Your stupid race deserve to be at least [redacted by pp, sept 21, 2019]. I see LOTS of very stupid white people as you in internet since white trash bozo election. Your race is mostly irrational as you. Enough is enough. Interestingly east asians… even homossexual east asians…
I notice retarded conservatives also are very good to manipulate informations and data as good criminal many them are
There are unfortinately 180 million white trash $$ in uass over 40 million afro americans …
So dying muggy believe in Jesus jewish too?? Are you expecting to fly to heaven??
Anal sex is not absolutely common among homossexuals as gay porn x movies you watch suggest.
So good your genius ‘s self propaganda was imploded here.
Again, PP no have any reason to tolerate you and the other shit here.
So, chinks are superior to crackers??
is this a real picture? that’s as black as it gets.

maybe this is why peepee is obsessed with black women. she identifies with her skin color not her race.
but peepee is right. dark skin has nothing to do with why oprah is hideous. this girl is pretty.

oprah’s better looking than you
Jesus christ put that away!!
[redacted by pp, sept 21, 2019]
and yes. the best looking negroes have the least negroid facial skeletons. skin color has nothing to do with it.
same with the best looking mongoloids, almost all of whom are japanese, they look like yellow white people.
dark skin hides small imperfections. this is why very light skin that doesn’t have any imperfections is the most attractive. it tells you the person is very healthy.
Muggy’s mother after artificial tanning.
People who pay enormous attention to physical appearance OVER character and intellectual qualities = = = subhumans, just like the nazibeasts
but notice she still as red highlights in her skin. this says healthy.
maybe the other woman is part andaman pygmy.
In India you can look trans without be
Indeed thinking moses comments might even make more sense read backward.
you meant …thinking moses‘s comments…
Or it’s you who are in backward..
I estimate it’s the twentieth time in this blog, Muggy uses statistical about sexual inclination and hiv contamination rates.
i wonder if this coincides with the level of economic development in these states. as sailer mentioned, dravidians may be smarter than indo-aryans.
do the maps overlap?
U au
here’s a finer grained map of tfr.

proves mugabe right. india is FUBAR because should’ve been split into mutliple countries when the british left but wasn’t because megalomaniacal congress party leadership.
the above map shows much more clearly that the very dark skinned dravidian language speakers have the lowest tfrs in india.
”the above map shows much more clearly that the very dark skinned dravidian language speakers have the lowest tfrs in india.”
Muggy is speaking for blind people…
and somoans are not short. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Samoan_players_of_American_football
maybe she gets that idea from this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Tua
pretty sure tua is a lot shorter than 5’10” though.
but then this guy is 6’4″. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Parker_(boxer)
I cited the somoan height data in this article
https://pumpkinperson.com/2017/08/30/what-samoans-can-teach-us-about-ashkenazi-iq-and-brain-size/
negroes with stereotypical negroid facial skeleton look MUCH better when they have very dark skin.
so if black women prefer cafe-au-lait colored men and black men like redbones…it’s not the skin color…it’s the concomitant difference in facial skeleton.
but most black men are bi so who knows.
mario van peebles, rick fox, steph curry, joe louis, lenny kravitz, bob marley, philip michael thomas, Taimak Guarriello, etc.
they still can’t hold a candle to denzel.
But white skin itself is considered superior. This goes back to the fundamental difference between darkness & light.
A lot of black men bleach their skin (Michael Jackson, Sammy Sosa)
Vitiligo is a bitch, isn’t it?
Especially when it’s self-induced
And white women get spray tans, lip injections, and ass implants.
Michael Jackson bleached his skin because he had a skin condition that would give him light colored blotches all over. If he was trying to look like anyone it was his sister, not white people in general.
The only skin condition he had was the one he gave himself. He was a lying POS:
”but most black men are bi so who knows.”
How do you know*
So, bissexuality is the natural rule*
It certainly was in some ancient cultures. Greeks and Romans both found catamites to be an acceptable way to satiate their lascivious desires.
It’s a shame that there aren’t any studies on bisexual intelligence over time. It’s a more socially-acceptable behavior now than it was a few decades ago, but this would also tend to decrease the proportion of pathological (XYY) individuals. Then again, there is something to be said about testosterone and spatial ability.
it’s interesting that rr has spoken of the difference between income and class. and he claims that this explains why poor kids can score high on IQ tests and rich kids score low. that is, the poor kids who score high are from a higher class than the poor kids who score low.
the distinction between class and income isn’t made very often in america. it is in blighty. so lion can speak of “prole billionaires”, but he’s one of the few.
and according to gregory clark class is much less change-able than income…as he defined “class”. so even in sweden there isn’t much mobility in “class”. i wonder.
Oprah is the rare example of someone who climbed from rock bottom to the absolute pinnacle both in wealth AND class.
Although a lot of proles watched her show, oprah herself HATES television & never watches unless it’s something sophisticated like “the handmaid’s tale” or something with Emma Thompson. Worshipping Emma Thompson is a major class marker.
”it’s interesting that rr has spoken of the difference between income and class. and he claims that this explains why poor kids can score high on IQ tests and rich kids score low. that is, the poor kids who score high are from a higher class than the poor kids who score low.”
…..
It’s IDEOLOGY [play with words], STUPID
”class” word is basically about hierarchy in given society, a vaguely defined term.
Vaguely defined terms or groups have lots of exceptions…
poor or empoverished ”kids” [people] are, on avg [*], suitable to high BUT polite intellectual/cultural elites because
personality traits
IQ skills levels
nothing more or less
By later maturity zero percent of IQ variance can be explained by the social class you were raised in
Source?
does your family make you smarter? by James Flynn
Maybe freedom of choice mate instead arranged marriage make smarter people choice for another smarter people while arranged marriage would promote social class stability. Speculation for sure
Page number? Any other source?
It’s pretty much the theme of the whole book, but I’ll look for more specifics
so one theory is that “class” is just money + time.
this explains rr’s “low class rich kid”, but does it explain his “high class poor kid”?
That’s my theory. Social classes are simply the taxonomic level below race & ethnic group. They’re genetic clusters isolated by money & occupation instead of by geography or culture.
they are not, outside of indian jatis. Too much exogamy (sometimes even inter-ethnic), even if it’s assortative.
i forgot about india.
so in india there are very poor brahmins and very rich dalits, right?
do the rich dalits still score lower on IQ tests?
or do poor brahmins score higher than equally poor dalits?
rr’s theory explains why rich black kids score lower than poor white kids.
rr’s modus operandi is to be skeptical of everything except his own explanations.
so he says…
X, Y, Z are false and stupid because…
BUT…
W is true because…and then he says nothing.
this is a typical southern italian homosexual tactic.
”rr’s modus operandi is to be skeptical of everything except his own explanations”
you white cracker
”this is a typical southern italian homosexual tactic.”
yu have huge problems with HOMOSSEXUAL people. Obsessed with us. Please, kill yourself before huntington become worse…
so UN-kind.
what if my dad (and his dad and his brother and his sister) really did have hd???
a person who can’t stop “dancing” wishes he could stop “dancing”.
a person who can’t stop craving cock doesn’t wish he could stop craving cock?
why?
so the question is why is orthodox christianity better than buddhism?
(because all other religions are ‘tarded.)
because:
1. focus on good vs evil.
2. re-incarnation is a retarded idea.
3. THE BIG ONE…
only the penitent man will pass.
buddhism has no GUILT…
no desperation for FORGIVENESS…
no desire to to do this…
…
ROME
ALWAYS
WINS
!!!
Deary Satan,
give me patience…
This roast of RR is mean mean mean…but im tempted to agree with it…
he deserves it.
I’d be more interested in what the guy has to say about evolution if his iq criticisms weren’t so dumb.
“bro. you married way out of your league.”
stop calling my wife “bro”. — owen benjamin
the intellectual argument is over. the alt-right won. neo-liberals, globalists, libertarians, idpol-ers, etc. lost.
so the question is just…
how long can the lie be maintained?
the intellectual argument is over. the alt-right won. neo-liberals, globalists, libertarians, idpol-ers, etc. lost.
It shows mug of pee’s incredibly low social IQ that he never mentions neocons
Jeeesus,
this sick retard keep inventing new stupid names…
I hope huntington goes fast with you, retarded
”alt white trash right” defend
– destruction of environment
– stupid mythology
– stupid capitalis
– rampant corruption & nepotism
– sucking jewish ball$
– earth flat
– anti vaccines
stupidities based on fake philosophies..
only thing extreme right is truly right is
incontrolled immigration
AND JUST THAT
Italian fascist government is gone;
Hungarian fascist government is characterized by rampant corruption anti intellectualism, as well in Poland.. it’s not super popular
As well in brazil and occupied palestine.
Ideological extremists are usually anti-intellectual, whether they’re far-left or far-right. Intellectuals are threatening to them because they can often pick apart the ideas that put the despots in power originally, and then disseminate their own ideas in a persuasive fashion throughout the population. Communists are just as bad, if not worse than, the far right — just look at the Katyn massacre.
Read Animal Farm correctly. That ”communists” of so called real communism were/are fakes. I don’t disagree with you they are shits as right minions but, again, true communism is full blown democracy or power of people. Almost so called communist societies are dictatorial or power of one [hetero male] individual.
So called communist societies are and had been plagued by fake ”representative” democracy where political classe supposedly represent ”people’s needs”, this is a diabolical theatre, white trashy race is specially talented to produce for centuries.
Guess I forgot my quotation Marx.
Sorry, i wasn’t in the intent to be offensive
Using the numbers from Lynn and Vanhanen, most of the Arab League states tend to cluster around IQ 84, while Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia are accorded scores of 94, 87, and 94, respectively. There is some overlap between the two: Iraq’s estimated national IQ of 87 matches the number for Azerbaijan.
Geographical benefits from trade might have improved the standard of nutrition in the historical Arab world, as well as helping to support technological development more directly. The combination of geography and an overwhelming advantage in terms of population is likely responsible for the aberration. Indeed, the Arabs of the time may have averaged higher in IQ terms than the people they enslaved.
I’m curious whether the spread of emancipation in the West was a consequence of rising verbal IQ or of its benefit to some external group.
Arab elites no doubt have a higher IQ than avg people there. Maybe we are talking about significant social classes segregation among ahab’s in these oil-country-clubs.
https://diatribe.org/jama-paper-breaks-down-medical-research-funding-us
U au!!!!
Disproportionate rates of high IQ guays..
Differences:
diabetes is a chronic disease mostly caused by addictive behaviors. Longlife manageable.
Hiv is deadly for most people.
So diabetes seems less problematic because it can be controlled, for example, stoping CAPITALIST mostlyWHITE CRACKER ”enterpeneu.ur” to profit with people’s disease-inducing.
so given the HBDers think diabetes is just as “born with it” as sodomy why the above?
because sodomites have been sacralized by grabblers whereas fat people are still condemned.
in america it’s perfectly acceptable to make fun of “white trash” and fat people, but lose job because think sodomy is gross.
how sick is a country where a guy can stand up in parliament and say this, but a journalist can’t say what rod liddle said.
why aren’t fat people, smokers, alcoholics a “group”?
is their problem any less “born that way”?
it’s clownworld. the alt-right is something very new. it’s not the morons who appeared on oprah and other (((day time talk shows))).
No had such thing ”sodoma”, lunatic
”so given the HBDers think diabetes is just as “born with it” as sodomy why the above?”
More i pay attention to your comments more i perceive how simpleton you’re…
Diabetes type 1, well..
I’m talking about the type 2, i thought you knew…
”in america it’s perfectly acceptable to make fun of “white trash” and fat people, but lose job because think sodomy is gross.”
Crocodile tears…
”Some people LOVE to feel MORALLY SUPERIOR”, isn’t Muggy*
why aren’t fat people, smokers, alcoholics a “group”?
I can’t see where or by what u concluded this…
There is a body-shaming movement, dear.
Smokers and alcoholics
WHAT I ALREADY SAID FOR YOU, dear, it’s about addiction by some substance.
Are you capable to see these differences or not*
Homophobiac people is the WORST in the world, and, they are not ”just” that
It’s EXCEPTIONALLY expected they will be
racists
cruel beasts
mysoginics
whatever the shit a human being can be
even there are ”women from right” mostly who are domesticated prey and or sexual slaves. Very stupid ones who think without feminism they would live better. That’s a common feature among right wing primates, they don’t live in real time… just like most nonhuman animals, they are within their own instinctive time.
I was brainwashed to believe
ONLY
communists
are evil
Even these communists from ex-”second world” were truly communists or democratic egalitarians.
Even these communists from ex-”second world” were NOT truly communists or democratic egalitarians.
”In the United States, men who have sex with men (MSM), described as gay and bisexual,[44] make up about 55% of the total HIV-positive population”
660’000
”In the United States, 1.2 million people live with an HIV infection,”
Murrica have 327 million souls
4% of UA$$ is lgbt+_+_+_{]{}{ = 13,08 million of true colors
5% of lgbt people are hiv-positive… !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_the_United_States
I thought it was significantly higher than this… [~10-15%]
Well they are not going to be open about it. This is the SELF REPORTED number of homos with it.
Ok… so the number you instinct, i mean, you think, is
~30-40%**
Apropos of nothing, I’m curious as to where PP’s estimate of Hannibal Lecter’s IQ came from. There are a few old posts that cite “150+,” but no explanation of how that number was obtained. There’s a passage in Silence of the Lambs that asserts Dr. Lecter is “not measurable by any means known to man,” which likely implies a much higher IQ.
I feel quite comfortable with a 155 IQ estimate for Hannibal Lecter.
It’s actually not an estimate. My mother was reading the novel when I was a kid or teenager & she recognized a reference to the wechsler intelligence scales from my interest in them. Apparently the character was tested on the WAIS & scored in the 150s iirc
Wow, fictional characters might serve as archetypes for how society strives to be bit cant explain why theyre so difficult to achieve.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcR6uauZNzyjGgEou7zTntOUNfJONDnN9ONDUaLxofakI8-jVDtS
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/health-49740735?__twitter_impression=true
Or… women who used cesarian method report more stress or sensibility before the birth…
A genetic confounding case maybe
Pumpkin, how similar are school standardized tests in 8th grade like the Parcc’s and SBACs to the SATs?