The unspectacular brain size of Ashkenazim has long bothered me because if brain size plays a substantially causal role in IQ, then whatever selected for high Jewish IQ should have also selected for bigger brains by proxy, so the absence of larger brains makes the high Jewish IQ seem more cultural than biological.
Fortunately Dr. Henry Harpending, Greg Cochran, and Jason Hardy came to the rescue by linking the high Ashkenazi IQ to four other biological traits: Tay-Sachs, Niemann-Pick, Gaucher, and mucolipidosis type IV.
The New York Times reported:
Ashkenazic diseases like Tay-Sachs, they say, are a side effect of genes that promote intelligence.
The explanation that the Ashkenazic disease genes must have some hidden value has long been accepted by other researchers, but no one could find a convincing infectious disease or other threat to which the Ashkenazic genetic ailments might confer protection.
Why Jewish high IQ is linked to disease while East Asian high IQ is linked to brain size is something of a mystery, but may relate to the fact that Jewish IQ had to evolve with lightning speed and evolved in a much smaller population, or it may relate to verbal IQ vs spatial IQ. Who knows? So much research needs to be done and so few scientists are doing it.
I have long argued that height is to weight as brain size is to IQ. The taller you are, the more room there is a for a heavy body, just as the bigger brained you are, the more room there is for a high IQ mind, but in both cases, other factors determine how much of that room is used.
So in order for me to feel better about Jews having big IQs despite having slightly small brains, I needed to find a race that had big weights, despite having small heights.
Enter Samoans.
In a study where white males averaged 177 cm (SD = 6.4), Samoan men averaged 173 cm. Translating this to an IQ (Intelligence Quotient) type scale where the mean and SD in the white population are defined as 100 and 15 respectively, Samoans had a HQ (Height Quotient) of 91.
And yet, when it comes to weight, white males averaged only 80.3 kg (SD = 11.9) while Samoan men averaged 94.7 kg. Once again, setting the white mean and SD at 100 and 15 respectively, Samoans enjoyed a WQ (Weight Quotient) of 118!
So just as Ashkenazi Jews may have brains slightly smaller than the white mean set at 100, (Brain-size quotient = 94) despite having an average IQ that is higher (110), Samoans have heights well below the white mean, despite having weights that are way above.
Because just as Jews makeup for their brain size with Tay-Sachs, Niemann-Pick, Gaucher, and mucolipidosis type IV, Somans make up for their height with big muscles, big fat, and big bones.
Pumpkin Person 
I think that big brains are not enough for high intelligence. The reason I suspect for high intelligence has to do with the white matter connection and also the ability for the grey matter to store information. My g is 130 and figure weights is the most correlated with g. The brain area found to associated with figure weights is the right parietal frontal lobe junction. The connections between the parietal and frontal in my brain has high bandwidth and connect in such a way to manipulate data as g loaded. So if we carry on with this line of reasoning, then connections determine how information is manipulated. A brain may be 0.4 correlated with g but it is the organization of where information goes in the brain that counts.
organized connections = how information is manipulated = level of intelligence
That is what I think is happening.
As for my self. I saw a teachers conference where a lady presented a key fact I think applies to me. Of the four indexes if a discrepancy of 23 points is found the child has a learning disability. The discrepancy between my verbal and processing speed is 46 points. Most people have a somewhat balanced profile. But I do not. So this is why I think I have a learning disability. I do not know what it is but I am trying to find people to help me understand it. I am seeing my therapist of Friday and we and going to talk about emotional blockage. I will ask her if we can find someone that does disability testing.
Metaphor giddiness, vertigo & humour.
More seriously, the correlation among weight and height is certainly the same for Samoans. It is only if you had very fat short people and very skinny tall that the correlation would go down (or up with skinny short and fat tall) . You know that of course, you even said it once.
So your analogy is about causality and not correlation as you implied ( H is to W what Brain is to IQ).
Moreover, IQ is not an absolute value yet, it is only ranking, except some reaction time tests wich have abdolute value with a true 0.
The analogy is about both causation & correlation because the brain size-IQ correlation is about the same as the height-weight correlation (about 0.45 within sexes) and presumably both correlations are about the same within both Jews and Samoans
OK then, so if I remember well, you said H-W correlation is in general 0.4. Versus 0.45 here.
So the point is not that the Samoan are heavier than white people at a given height, but that the taller they are, the slightly heavier (compare to non Samoan) they get.
Then the analogy is : some races get more (weight or IQ) from what they’ve got (height or brain size).
Interesting analogy consequence. You could check it with this : If you grow more IQ for each brain-size gain, you must get a bigger sd in IQ and Weight – if we suppose the sd for the height and brain size is similar – than for other. It’s the opposite of the get rid of the dumb theory.
It doesn’t necessarily imply a greater weight or IQ SD in Samoans and Jews respectively. If a constant number of pounds/IQ points are added to Samoans/Jews for any given height/brain size, then their weight/IQ means will be higher without more variability, unless their height or brain size distribution is already more variable
No because in that case correlation would be the same. That was my first message.
My only point was that variable can X can be a major casual correlate (r = 0.45) of variable Y in both population A and population B, and yet A can average higher than B on X yet lower than B on Y. Not sure you can infer anything about SDs from that fact alone.
[Dear Pumpkin, you have never edit any of my comments, and this time, if you feel I’m insisting too much, don’t hesitate to do it. I love your intelligence and intellectual integrity, so I wouldn’t like to appear disputing you.]
I agree with you. If you’re just saying you could have different correlations between t two variables X & Y among different populations A & B, the difference being caused by whatever reason (included another variable), there is no possibility to infere anything about the SD in populations A & B.
But I understood your analogy as a bit more ambitious, and being about the increase of the correlation from 0.40 to 0.45 (among the variables X & Y). So it is about having a transformation function that goes from a given population A to a population B.
You could swap some people and get the same SD but it wouldn’t be a transformation function. So the only way to increase the correlation is to spread the people : you want the tall to be heavier and/or the short to be lighter. You want the one with bigger brain to be more intelligent and/or the other way around. That is exactly equivalent to increasing the SD. Because what is needed is that the increase in height/brain size, gives you a bigger increase in weight/IQ (if you only add a constant or a proportional factor of X to Y, you don’t increase the correlation among X and Y).
The hypothesis then would be rephrased that way : Saying that brain size causes intelligence should’nt be contradictory with the fact of jewish being more intelligent that other people for each given brain size. The reason is that jewish can, by natural selection, have increased the efficacy of their brain compared to gentile. If that hypothesis is true, then you should have a higher SD of IQ among jewish than among gentile.
In fact, for Samoan, I’ve just read that a theory is that when they get into their Island and starved, they had an interest in storing more fat and a genetic mutation that allows that spread. It’s not important if that theory is true. It just helps to illustrate the question. If 100% of the people had this genetic mutation, and lets say they would be all 20% more fat as a result of the new cause Z, the correlation would have staid the same (the ranking doesn’t change, only everyone is more fat). If the correlation went up, it’s because lots of people had this gene but not all. Some people became more fat for a given height. Then among the resulting population, B, the Samoan, the SD had to grow (compare to the population of origin A).
Bruno, i get how an increased correlation could increase the SD, but I’m assuming the same correlation in all races
I know i upgraded the correlation from 0.4 to 0.45 as i did more research, but I’m assuming for now that upgrade applies to all races equally
So if you make exceptions for weight with people that are big boned, have more fat capacity, thicker bones etc, really height is just one among many factors for weight, rather than the dispositive factor.
Most east asian men have small heads pumpkin, you realise that?
Yes, height’s just one of many factors that cause weight just like brain size is just one of many factors that cause IQ, but if you had to bet on who was heavier, a seven foot guy or a six foot guy, you’d put your money on the former. Same with brain size and IQ (excluding pathological cases)
When reared in first world countries at least, East Asian brains dwarf white brains.
Actually if you told me whether was a 6ft samoan person or a 7ft asian person, I would bet on the race.
Well if you know both race and height you can predict weight more precisely just like if you know both race and brain size, you can predict IQ more precisely. Though it’s still very rough guess.
I suppose the dispositive question is would I rather know a persons race, bone density, cholesterol level or height to guess weight.
”so the absence of larger brains makes the high Jewish IQ seem more cultural than biological.”
First basic lesson.
It’s doesn’t exist.
Why do you think like that*
Jeeesuisis!!!!
NYTIMES promoting that phrenological pseudo-science!!!!
”Why Jewish high IQ is linked to disease while East Asian high IQ is linked to brain size is something of a mystery, but may relate to the fact that Jewish IQ had to evolve with lightning speed and evolved in a much smaller population, or it may relate to verbal IQ vs spatial IQ. Who knows? So much research needs to be done and so few scientists are doing it.”
[what is the number of posts with this matter you already wrote**]
My pet-theory is that, first, if all jewish groups have comparatively higher prevalence of some genetic disorders [and diseases] so it’s may mean that it’s a result of general-jewy founder effect.
Second, if the european jews are the only who have over-selected for higher intelligence and many of this diseases are direct product of this higher intelligence, namely the capacity to faster reasoning and the type of selection among east asians has been more balanced, as well among europeans. In this way, this diseases must be more common among smarter jewish families than among less-smarter ones.
But when we compare east asian and european smart fraction with jewish smart fraction, the first and the second tend not to have higher incidence of genetic disorder, indeed, higher intelligence, on avg, correlates with better health. But there are subgroups of higher intelligence as well higher creativity. Seems at priori obvious to conclude that, while higher semantic/cognitive intelligence correlates with better health, it’s not exactly the same reality for higher creativity capacity, if higher creativity usually correlates with family historical of mental disorders.
Third, i read in somewhere that higher discrepancy between verbal and non-verbal cognitive intelligence is one of the signs of mental disorders, that it’s very common this discrepancies among all mental disorders. Also it’s inequivocal the correlation between left handedness and mental/general disorders, as well with higher intelligence/creativity, some examples, Oprah and Gates (**). And i read in more than one study that ashkenazim have more lefthanders than in other populations. Well, just look the number of: mentally disordered people [sociopathic for example] as well homossexuality among them. It’s a indication that they may have more lefties and this tend to correlates with a lot of things, very good and very bads.
Fourth, combining: higher endogamy, greater selection to higher intelligence and differential selection to personality type [sociopathic type** higher on openess/ambiguous thinking style**] while east asians and europeans has been selected to be tamed, more amalgamated.
Jews have many of these diseases from centuries of cousin marriage. People don’t know that jews are as in inbred as pakistanis.
These genetic diseases are from cousin marriages. But you are right that they may be more from the type of intelligence (verbal/social/parasitic) being chosen. I have said numerous times that most asian smart fraction people and at least half of white smart fraction individuals exhibit aspergers like Tesla or Gates or Buffet.
This is because whites and asians do not select for social intelligence in their societies but solving problems for Master. Jews never had a Master. They were nomads living under gentile barons and aristocrats for 1000 years. So they evolved deviousness and finding a way around Master.
In many ways jews are probably more evolved to survive than whites and asians, both collectively and individually. My theory of Masters pets explains it because its rooted in historical fact. Pumpkins theory is rooted in ‘I pulled down the window and looked outside and saw it was like that and therefore it is good. The End.’
I do agree that the nomadic life style of Jews and gypsies selected for certain personality traits that make them different from races grounded in a longterm society, but i think you underestimate the role of cold winters in shaping East Asian temperament
Jews evolved to thrive in existing western civilizations by doing jobs like money lending. But if transported back to hunter-gather times i doubt they could compete with East Asians
Mongols have roughly the same average IQ as other East Asians, is their IQ also a result of selection by the master ?
Mongolian phenotype is super older or they are descendant of other populations?
Mongol IQ evidence?
Men have bigger brains than women and also have better spatial skills, maybe this spatial skills require more areas of brain. Also it’s important analyse white, gray matters, for example, as well to compare specific areas by areas, and not just total size.
Pathological liars have significantly higher white than gray matter in their pre-frontal cortex, if i’m not saying any incorrect information.
”The implications are twofold. The sheer amount of white substance gives regular liars the ability to create stories much, very quickly, so quickly that it is hard to tell if they are lying or telling the truth. It also gives them more power to assess the responses and reactions of the people they are talking to, to see if the lie is working and make the necessary adjustments.
The reduced gray matter is also very important because it is the gray matter of the prefrontal lobes that helps to govern the choices we make. It is our moral center, and with gray matter reduced, researchers suggest that the brains of pathological liars are not only equipped to create tales and stories, but also to see nothing morally wrong in their constant lies.”
http://knowledgenuts.com/2015/01/03/liars-and-honest-people-have-entirely-different-brains/
“Dr. Drew Pinsky, who treated Fleiss for substance abuse, performed brain scans on her that showed significant frontal lobe dysfunction, which Pinsky surmised was behind her inability to empathize with people, and her affinity for doing so with birds.”
I think youre right. And I think Dr Pinsky found out why jews lie so much.
Philosopher do you have any scientific evidences jews lie more than other races? We all have our beliefs but in a scientific forum it’s important to back up our claims with real research, not anecdotes
Please be more responsible
PP so you have any evidence of otherwise?? Do you already read Kevin McDonald blog??
Or better
Who lies more than Jews?
Santo all races have bad people. White Gentiles are not so innocent themselves if you look through history.
High IQ races exploit lower IQ races. We’ve seen this for milions of years of human evolution, jews are just the latest group to gain power
So do you think I believe white”s” are always innocent??
Do you know you are justifying bad actions with “everyone already did this, leave them to do bad actions too”.
This matter seems too complex to you understand it.
Do you believe evilness is equally distributed among races and groups??
That collective narrative at least to non-Jewish populations seems already deadly wrong.
“white gentiles ARE not always innocent”
You are generalizing a well and even easily understood groups of people while we have little reliable information about Jews specially Ashkenazim. In the end of day, they are hyper tribalistic = all group faults is justified or “rationalized” and worst blaming others”/ it’s evil, immature and morally unacceptable.
I can judge “them” by how they have behaved and .. It’s not nothing good here.
Pumpkin should let Mikey guest blog.
I would be honoured to have mikey write a guest article
is there any evidence that mikey is mikey the commenter?
Mikey reminds me of a guy I grew up with. I havent seen him in 15 years. He tried to become a musician I think. Dunno what happened.
Remarkably some of the guys who wanted to become musicians I grew up with, actually became musicians and made an ok living. And I ended up following the textbook and being a corporate bureaucrat helping Master and sucking very badly at it.
I suspect I would have been a much better musician than consultant, banker, or financial regulator.
over 70% of America’s music industry is controlled by 3 companies. Most likely your buddy just gave up. Phil if you were born in the internet age of free information, you would be 1 million times better off.
Anyway I just talked to a guy today bout how I have my own business. He told me not to ever give up and always follow my ambition. Luckily i have done my research and know all about the age-crime /genius curve. As long as i stay healthy,fit and able to physically fight against younger men, along with only raising a 1st born son while simultaneously abandoning my other children.My ambition and productivity should stay hi well into my 60s and 70s.
*note a woman’s 1st born son is always born with the highest levels of testosterone,
and therefore the highest probability to pass on genes.
In other words SONS CARRY DIMINISHING RETURNS
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200807/men-do-everything-they-do-in-order-get-laid-i
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivers%E2%80%93Willard_hypothesis
*note a woman’s 1st born son is always born with the highest levels of testosterone
I’m pretty sure that’s BS. I don’t think there’s a lot of evidence for birth-order effects.The Trivers-Willard hypothesis has been disputed by a number of scholars (with that said, Robert Trivers is one of the most interesting characters in the history of science. You should read his autobiography that came out recently.)
Anyhow, I think you should take care of all your kids, if you can. Don’t you want them to love you???
Gondwanaman. I dont need their love. When i was 18 i made my decision to actively go out and get a woman pregnant. It took me in between 3 and 4 years later to succeed. Im simply doing whats best for my genes. I live in America, the land of no child left behind. They will survive to adulthood without me. I plan on raising a single one of my sons one day, to pass on the family business and the legacy. Until then im taking the shotgun approach towards making children.
Wow, that’s kinda cold and calculating, but whatever you have to do to spread your seed, right?
How many times do you have to nut in your girl to make her conceive?
It is cold and it is calculating, and your exactly right. Oh man listen i went on 4 dates in 4 days with her, and we had unprotected sex on that forth day and every single day afterward 2-3 times a day for about 3 months straight no break. we conceived about the 2nd week. but damnit man i had to make sure.
where did you meet her? what sign is she and what sign are you? i believe that she had s*x with you,because you are assertive,in good physical shape, use curse words and own a gun. girls are only willing to have s*x with men who are knot nice. that’s why i never have a gf and get rejected. what was your reaction when she got pregnant? so it realy is true that women get pregnant from having s*x with men?o. m. g.!
I think weight is an adaptation to a lack of winter. Winter culled the weak while starvation and bugs culled people in the tropics. South Asians have a high rate of diabetes, even when accounting for BMI. It is similar to the r/k correlation except humans in the tropics were selected for how well they could starve.
For the samoans its island giagnticism. All species of all types are much larger on islands for various ecological reasons, including humans.
For their % of the population, pacific islanders are extremely overrepresented in rugby union and rugby league and I suspect NFL
Islanders are mongloid peoples however and many of the pacifist and anti-psychopathic traits they inherit.
Wrong. Island species are typically /smaller/ than their continental cousins (Flores hobbits & Key Deer being two most famous examples). Unless, that is, the species engage in cannibalism (Kodiak bears & Pacific Islanders being two most famous examples).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_gigantism
A question I find interesting is why native Americans are disposed to drink, like celtic people.
Its very obvious the the rate of alcoholism in these communities is much higher than other enthnicities. Is it genetic?
Is it cultural?
Im pretty determinist so I lean towards genetics, or at least a disposition. But it could be something even more subtle – i propose both celtics and natives are more prone to depression. And they drink to cover it up.
Notice the way blacks dont drink. This is because they have the opposite to depression. Schizo tendencies and psychopathy.
I would suggest that celtics and native americans drink more because they are depressive. And they are depressive because it may be related to warrior genes. Trumpys brother died an alcholic. So imo, trumpys mother gave him the genetics for it.
There is probably no genetic relation directly, but indirectly through mood regulation. The best way to fight depression mon freres, is to fight. People snap out of it when their family is threatened physically. Time and again, you can rouse a man from the deepest pit by triggering warrior genes.
I should have been a psychiatrist.
Ireland and whooly irish peoples are maybe 2% of the Western white population. But the first ever UFC two weight champion and world heavyweight boxing champion (since stripped from him due to political correctness and talking about jews). This is as ‘odd’ as 1% of western populations being jews and 40% of forbes billionaires and nobel prize winners, and 50% of big tech founders/hedge funds/private equity.
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxingnewsonline.net%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F04%2Ftyson-fury.jpg&f=1
Put up a video on youtube about jews degrading culture and assaulting morality.
Gets the title taken off him.
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fphotos.laineygossip.com%2Farticles%2Fmel-gibson-open-06sept16-05.jpg&f=1
Made a record breaking movie about jews screwing christians.
Has a man follow him around with a camcorder everytime he gets drunk and blacklisted from Hollywood for 15 years. Comes back due to SHEER TALENT. AND VOWS TO MAKE THE PASSION PART 2 BECAUSE HE IS A LEGEND.
jews are < 40% of the forbes 400 and much more than 50% of hedge fund and pe billionaires. or maybe they're more now. n/a calculated jews and part jews were 36%. almost 100% of these are in media and finance.
when the finance/real estate and media fortunes are excluded from the 400 the jews are not especially over-represented.
western european gentiles and and ne asians are still the best creators of wealth.
yet another proof that pill is jewish.
sad!
So while everyone was fondling their teddy bears and sucking on the soothers, Mel Gibson was saying jews start all the wars and asault the West before anyone even had dial up internet.
How is it, that Mel Gibson knows the deal and every gentile in hollywood and the vast majority didnt in 2002?
Because of INSTINCT. HE CAN TELL BECAUSE HE IS IMMUNE FROM MIND CONTROL.
Ive talked at length how some types of people can’t be mind controlled, or not for long. Mel was john the baptist crying in the wilderness while all of you forsook him and laughed at his ‘rants’ while you were fondling your teddy bears.
I genuinely see Mel Gibson as a prophet of some sort. In my opinion Mel Gibson may have been sent by the Creator to be a visionary and artistic leader. Most people won’t accept anything unless its in a fucking hollywood movie.
No Jews do not start all wars. Jews opposed the Vietnam war.
Please take your medication before commenting. Scholarly discussion of Jews is welcome but you’re just promoting your ethnic genetic interests by smearing a rival race at every opportunity.
So Kissinger was not on medication then?
Kissinger didnt come until later
Or PP have a infantile brain or she is pure evil, as I think most hdds are.
So “Jews” opposed to Vietnam war… Ok. Any source??
New PP tactic: use terms like “scientific discussion… scholar discussion” to dismiss their opponents.
Would be interesting you write a post exposing your highlights about Jews, again, explaining your theories that deny ANY or MOST of Jewish participation in all this crap.
Sadly HBD blogs naturally attract some right wingers and right wingers attract anti-semites. And these anti-semites end up converting some right-wingers into anti-semites. Please figure out a way to keep out anti-semites from your blog.
Instinct don’t necessarily prevent people to not be manipulated by others because domestication don’t mean less instinct but changed instinct from natural to social mode. But yes we can say that more men lean natural instinct than social and it’s less prone to be manipulated BY social or emotional blackmail but not necessarily by natural instinct.
I would be shocked if Mel doesn’t think even MORE FORCEFULLY that jews control everything and are leading people to satan or a jim jones death cult.,
ONCE AGAIN. WE HAVE 130IQ+ HARVARD/YALE/OXFORD ETC ETC COOLIES AND HUNDREDS OF ACADEMICS AND SCIENTISTS IN THE WEST WHO DONATE MONEY TO AFRICA BUT CANT FIGURE OUT THEY ARE MIND CONTROLLED UNLIKE A WORKING CLASS ACTOR FROM AUSTRALIA WHO IS A DEVOUT CATHOLIC WHO SPENDS MOST OF HIS DAY WRITING FICTION STORIES.
IT MAKES YOU THINK.
you’re ignoring gibson’s father and his influence on mel. he was a jeopardy champion. not stupid.
So chomsky keeps saying its ‘the establishment’. Why doesnt anyone ask chomsky who is the establishment? The media the banks the millitary industrial blah blah. And who is the media, the banks, the MIC?
‘Straight white old gentiles’.
100% chomsky would say that if you burrowed at him. He would rather set himself on fire than admit Mel Gibson, a man that pretends to be other people for a living, got it right and he who writes 400 page books on the topic for a living can’t work it out.
MYSTIFYING!
Australia might be a good country onwhich to tests a lot of your theories about Jewish influence since their Jewish elite is so tiny.
I notice their “black” population (australoid) is not as successful as America’s
PP
Do a post articulating about your theories of “Jews are angels and don’t dominating, manipulating and destroying ‘white’ countries”. And please, personal opinions are first part of arguments, they are strongly required.
All powerful cultures manipulate and destroy less powerful cultures.
So if white culture become stronger again and decide eliminate black culture, generically speaking, you will accept this??
Their black population is also much more retarded and ugly-looking.
i agree. someone needs to take down chomsky. he agreed to an interview with ali g.
i could knock him out in a few minutes, but he’d never agree to a filmed interview.
you’re bragging about knocking out an old man?
So ‘170 IQ’ bill gates gets the complete opposite to the right answer and mel gets it before anyone else.
Tell me pumpkin who is more intelligent?, I guarantee each one of Mel’s 12 or whatever children won’t be growing up thinking about fucking africa.
The right answer is Mel Gibson, thats why he’s much better looking. Think about it.
peepee’s defense of nerds is motivated exclusively by her lesbianism. nerdy men aren’t competition for women.
Gates believes in HBD I’m 100% sure. His curing diseases is just a nerdy hobby for him (like me doing stats) and a way of getting great media coverage and securing his place in history
He’s actually a very aggressive incredibly arrogant nerd & sadly, i suspect he secretly looks down on blacks
There is no evidence anywhere that gates believes in HBD.
There’s evidence he’s a huge believer in IQ, and it’s rare for IQ people to not be HBDers
High tech geeks are probably the most HBD aware because they work in a very cognitively demanding environment where you can’t coast on affirmative action, so they see firsthand which races sink or swim
“There’s evidence he’s a huge believer in IQ, and it’s rare for IQ people to not be HBDers”
Most believers in IQ are autistic, is the stereotype.
Philosopher said that looking at his behavior, Gates is Aspergers.
Or
Most autists believe in IQ if compared with neurotypical populations.
The Philosopher is so wrong it hurts. I’m looking at some nerdastic software developing losers I knew from college right now on Facebook, and they are discussing the Bell Curve and the alt-right. Nerds (aka autists) love that shit.
Meanwhile the the multi-gender identifying, transracial, multi-hair colored stank armpit-hairy SJW bitch who also identifies with beluga whales and sheeps and dresses as a Furry is more schizo than probably anyone on the right.
The Philosopher IS WRONG WRONG WRONG STOP DISCUSSING THE SAME GODDAMN THING OVER AND OVR
Many people are obsessive about sport pumpkin. Doesn’t mean they are aware of HBD about blacks.
I can promise you more schizo people are aware about HBD than autists. Theres no academic studies on it gondwana, but all you have to do is walk into an engineering lecture in your local uni and then meet a local drug dealer and his clients for a chat.
If Bill Gates was HBD aware.
He wouldn’t be donating his life fortune to Africa. Its that simple.
That doesn’t follow logically philosopher. Indeed you could argue that if he believed in HBD he’d give MORE money to Africa because he’d feel they needed the most help. And regardless of HBD, Africans are still functioning way below their genetic potential (their test scores are much lower than their genetic cousins: African Americans) so you get more bang for your buck helping Africans as opposed to Americans, where the benefits of charity have diminishing returns.
By investing billions in Africa now, Gates feels he can go down in history as the guy who single handedly eradicated deadly diseases, thus ending suffering and death for generations of kids. What better legacy can he have? Just because it doesn’t advance your agenda, doesn’t mean he’s socially retarded. From the perspective of his goals, he’s quite shrewd.
“That doesn’t follow logically philosopher. Indeed you could argue that if he believed in HBD he’d give MORE money to Africa because he’d feel they needed the most help. ”
You miss the entire point of HBD knowledge. The reason africa is poor is because most of their population is predatory or quasi psychopathic and brutal/barbaric. If you knew that you wouldn’t want their population to quintuple in 50 years.
When I said Gates was HBD aware, I meant with respect to IQ. You might be right about him being an HBD denier when it comes to criminality and other personality traits since very little HBD research has been done there (aside from Rushton’s r/K theory). But the point of Gates’s charity is presumably to enhance his reputation and to challenge him intellectually, and on that level it’s working quite well.
I think you guys are missing a really important factor – the base percent of the brain that is dedicated towards abstract reasoning vs other stuff. For example, a gorilla brain size is ~1/3 the relative size of a human brain, but it has far less than 1/3 as much abstract reasoning.
If verbal IQ comes from a small share of the brain, useful IQ in modern society could be hugely boosted at the expense of a small decline in the percent of the brain dedicated to other purposes. E.g., if verbal IQ takes up 10% of the brain, doubling this would require a loss of only ~11% of non-verbal IQ brain mass.
Yes, i think jews were selected for symbolic IQ (verbal + mathematical) because civilization was already built so they didn’t need the spatial IQ to construct buildings & design weapons which was so important in the evolution of big brained East Asians
Agreed. Jews also tend to be significantly shorter and slighter of stature than Europeans, so there brains may also be larger on a relative basis.
So parsees may have a lower spatial skills…
Northern Italians were on the same stature than Jews at least in XIX century?? I read somewhere that polish Jews were the tallest among shekelnazim.
Gaucher disease increase intelligence only among ashkenazis??
Some personality traits correlate more with this sub-groups of shekelnazis who have relatives with this genetic disorders?? If compared with general Jewy pop and family without historical??
in his latest post professor shoe proves again that he’s either fake or stupid. nagle has zero understanding of the alt-right. she’s pathetic. the irish accent should be illegal.
peepee’s blog makes the world dumber.
the samoans and whites would have to be matched for lean body mass.
the samoans would still be heavy, as are blacks. blacks because of denser bones, samoans because of more voluminous bones and more muscle.
the polynesians are the world’s most robust people. i guess se asians are the world’s most gracile.
I agree that fat-free weight is a lot more analogous to IQ than total body weight, but i chose the latter cause its correlation with height is virtually identical to IQ’s correlation with brain size (don’t know fat-free weight’s correlation with height)
one sees this variation in robustness within chiner.
the manchurians and manchus are robust.
the hong kong chinese are gracile.
in general.
i worked with two taiwanese who were robust. the taiwanese come mostly from fujian, but these taiwanese may have been descendants of the elite chinese who left for taiwan after the revolution.
it’s obvious to anyone who’s dealt with jews.
they’re smart stupid people.
modulo nutrition/wealth this confirms the longitudinal height gradient.
http://shanghaiist.com/2015/07/01/average-heights-men-women.php
Theres a lot of very very influential people that read Sailer.
I remember Sailer quoted Maureen o Dowd in the NYT as using his phrases and terms. If she reads him, they must all talk about him. I suspect a lot of the elites that back trump got their intellectual grounding in Sailers writings.
Sailer really is a national treasure. He helped convert me from mainstream liberal to national socialist.
has chomsky got on board the trump train?
what do you think of this video peepee?
Two thumbs up! 🙂
Why
Cause black lesbians are cool!
I don’t like this one. But I “remember” two beautiful movies about lesbian : Boys don’t cry. In Texas, so wonderful. And another what, from Canada, When Night is Falling. I was in love with the lesbian professor of theology 🙂
Outrageously hot that second movie. Send me to space mountain!!!
peepee will be just as entertained if she has no commenters.
so all i have to say is…
God loves you peepee, even if you hate Him.
and…
my moustache is making you very sleepy. very sleepy.
Here is a IQ test for deductive reasoning. Basically a test to see if you would be a good detective or not. Im taking my time using pen and paper, and writing down my answers so i can come back to the test later. It took every ounce of my mental fiber just to figure out the 1st 2 puzzles. i have like 8 or more left.
https://www.123test.com/deductive-reasoning-test-figures/
one of the few songs that accurately depicts evolutionary psychology.
PP,
On a non-IQ related note, why do you think samoans evolved to be so muscular? I mean one would naturally assume land (inland/mountainous) based people from colder climes would be strong and muscular, but samoans being native to tiny islands in temperate climes being so muscular? What do you think the reason maybe for that? Or is it just extra muscle but no extra strength?
I have no idea, but it totally violates Allen’s rule. It’s funny how anytime there’s an exception to Rushton’s rule, critics claim it’s been debunked, yet when other scientific theories show anomalies, they’re just the exception that proves the rule.
Polynesians in general (at least Hawaiians/Samoans/Tongans) are some BIG mothafuckas. The ones I’ve met were somewhat tall (around 6’0″-6’2″) but BIG AS HELL. Like fat and muscular and over 400 pounds.
That’s the last group of people I would want to be in a physical altercation with. They even like rap music and gangsta black culture. I’m not sure how violent they are but they sure like to murder some fast food/buffets.
Pumpkin It’s quite obvious — East Asians generally have larger brains than Caucasoids, yet Ashkenazim and Whites in general have made better use with their brains.