
cnn.com reports:
Your brain consists of two types of tissue, gray matter and white matter. In your first decade of life, the gray matter grows and expands rapidly as many new synapses, or connections between nerves, are being made. The gray matter grows as you learn and are exposed to new experiences as a child.
Then, as your body prepares for puberty, your brain starts to prune back some of that gray matter and amp up its production of white matter, which allows different parts of the brain to share information better and faster, said Dr. Jess Shatkin, a child and adolescent psychiatrist at the Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center….”The brain volume, the total volume, doesn’t really change, but we lose about 1% of gray matter starting around 13 and we gain about 1% of white matter at the same time, and that trade off keeps going,” Shatkin said.
However it seems that in both autism and schizophrenia, this process goes wrong, with autistics ending up with not enough white matter and schizophrenics ending up with not enough gray matter.
Webb MD states:
Researchers say white and gray matter are both necessary for general intelligence, but they perform different functions. Gray matter represents information processing centers in the brain, and white matter represents the network or connections between those processing centers.
The lack of white matter might explain why autistics tend to have narrow interests. If white matter allows different brain parts to share information, which is needed for broad interests, those lacking this may be forced to focus on a single topic.
This may also explain why autistics lack social skills. Reading people requires integrating verbal and non-verbal cues and thus using different parts of the brain at once.
Perhaps this research also reveals why autistics tend to come from high IQ families (or at least higher class ones) or why high people often show a dash of autism. Having a lot of gray matter is linked to high IQ, but if your kid inherits only your gray matter genes without the developmental timing to prune that gray to make room for white matter, he might be severely autitsic.
Meanwhile the high white to gray ratio of schizophrenics may help explain their delusions. Sharing information between unrelated brain parts might lead to a lot of creative theories, but if you lack the gray matter to test these theories with logic, you soon could lose contact with reality.
Research into gray and white matter is further evidence of Crespi and Badcock’s theory that autism is the opposite of schizophrenia.
It also supports Simon Barron Cohen’s extreme male brain theory of autism, in that males tend to have higher gray/white matter ratios than females.
I have trouble integrating sound and sight. I cannot talk and look at the same time. It’s distracting. I suppose that I can watch video clips and understand persons but it may be complicated. Autism is a spectrum. The condition is not black and white. Different autists are wired up differently. Both grey and white matter. I may only have some parts of my brain that function incorrectly but other parts function much better than average. I understand people well it is just a sensory problem not a social intelligence problem. The point is I am unsymmetrical in some way, even accounting for lateralization. But I am intuitive well still having impairments. A therapist I saw said I was intelligent in a different way than normal.
Pumpkin, it seems like short term memory storage capacity can be improved? But what real world benefits does it have if far transfer effects are not found?
I think the verbal IQ to understand Marxist economics needs to be really high. Its not just interpreting the way they use their often idiosyncratic terms, but what the arguments actually are being made.
I find translating the terms into simpler terms can help a bit, but there are still a lot of propositions that entail paradoxes or interact with each other in unruly ways (both in real life and as a concept in your mind as a model representation).
https://www.unz.com/isteve/1992-article-on-jeffrey-epstein/
So Sailer seems to be inferring Epstein was a ‘catch me if you can’ conman of many personas type.
Puppy will like the part where its confirmed Epstein had a high quantitative IQ.
But from all these stories and various other things I’ve read, Epstein must have had a top 2% social IQ to go from groundskeepers son to ponzi scheme person.
BTW in my opinion, high social IQ and math IQ don’t ever go together for gentiles. But for jews its quite notable in the record – I think its genetic or based on genetic evolutionary role as ‘the merchant’.
“I’m looking forward to Elizabeth Warren being the Democratic nominee so we can finally have that National Conversation about Affirmative Action that Democrats have been wanting to have for 50 years.” – Steve Sailer
For those of you who have given up on Trumpy, don’t forget that the 2020 election will involve him debating someone like Kamala Harris or some other jew puppet. Very high probability a lot of ‘truth bombs’ are going to be said on national tv about ‘social justice’.
campaign trumpy does not equal trumpy in office. its not 2015/16 anymore when will you understand this fact? he went to ohio recently and lectured people about chiner stealing “intellectual property” and that we need to increase immigration for when the good jobs come back. fukc trumpy fuck the gop fuck the establishment on both sides. he’s been a hapless ineffectual cuck and i wouldn’t be surprised if the gop outright replaced him as the nominee
It’ll be super predictable and irritating, but I don’t trust Trump’s ability to respond to it. Sure, his aides can prepare some canned responses for the debates, but he’s such a moron I have no faith in anything he does.
In all likelihood, I’ll still vote for him, though.
Why will you still vote for him?
How idiotic does someone how to be to think socialism is a bad thing? I’m so sick and tired of rich people getting all the breaks while we’re just left to rot. Trickle down economics does not work and it never will
I’m assuming Biden will win the Dem nominee.
I pretty much agree with what you said, and I think Biden is even LESS friendly to low SES folks than Trump is. AFAICT Biden is pro-Nafta and pro-mass immigration, both of which screw poor people. And I doubt he’d push living wage legislation in office.
This is mostly based on anecdote. I’ve yet to meet a Biden supporter in the wild. I’d be shocked if Bernie or Warren don’t win the dem nominee. The joe Rohan podcast helped a lot with Bernies public image.
If one of those two won would you vote for them? What about Yang?
Mass immigration does not affect the poor like people think it does. It’s at the bottom of the list as far as political policies go when it comes to being detrimental to the poor. Outsourcing and automation are worse just to name a couple. Mass immigration is fine if it’s legal
Joe Rogan**
Yeah, outsourcing and automation are bad. Sorta what I was getting at with Nafta.
I’d vote for Yang. Less sure about what I’d do if it were Sanders or Warren. I was super right-wing up until a year or so ago, so I haven’t given ideas like free college tuition and free medical care much thought. They’re definitely inside the present-day Overton window, so there’s probably a pretty good case to be made for them.
Very interesting. It shouldn’t be that difficult to test that correlation for Psy.
Poor Puppy. So dim. So gullible.
I bet if a black celebrity started molesting only white children and spent millions trying to fight the authorities and the victims, Puppy would side with the paedophile.
Oh wait….Puppy already sided with Michael Jackson.
Actually it was you who thought Jacko was innocent. I’ve been 100% positive he was guilty from day one. Sadly like many schizophrenics you seem to have early onset dementia
Im shocked at Philo mental performance lately. I think he might be in real danger…
melo reminds me of thai ladyboys.
why so many ladyboys in thailand? a thai woman claimed thai culture was feminine.
yes melo. long hair and makeup and heels and jewellery are UN-Cynical and therefore disgusting/filipino-ish.
old norse women vs filipino ladyboys is sad.
Mugabe likes short haired women because it reminds him of that time he had to wear a dress for his uncle and sit on his lap.
peepee only posts my worst comments.
my mother’s mother and her mother were less made-up/be-jewelled than my mom was/is…and my mom is very UN-meretricious.
the point is…heterosexual men don’t need cues…women by themselves un-made are schwing! and this is what makes transvestites and transgenders and filipino ladyboys so utterly disgusting and evil.
Is anxiety more of an autistic or schizoid trait?
Mug of gee can you please (please) link the paper regarding south koreans having lower brain weights than englishmen from autopsies.
Or am i hallucinating again like i did that one time regarding the Indian caste IQ study?
Mug of pee bickers on about japanese not having large enough brians in the beals et al study but there are other studies that show japanese being almost equal to koreans.
Despite being 5 cm smaller on avarage!
The japanese studies are older though, so their brains might be even bigger today!
Theres regional differences in japan too (generally a north-south cline, corresponding to more ainu/jomon and tungistic admixture, and less south east asian/pre han-expansion south chinese), with the ainu being intermediate between japanese and artic/tungistic/mongol peoples (if the beals et al study regarding artic/tungistic/mongol is to be belived).
https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19768354.2015.1018943
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000415
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000415
if a woman is less attractive to you because she has short hair…
you’re fag.
both women and men with long hair and facial hair are gross because UN-Cynical.
Mugabe doesn’t like women in make up because it reminds him that they’re not men.
If you just leave before the next morning you don’t have to worry about it.
My gf barely needs make up. I can actually look at her in the morning.
My father said something similar about my mom.
i was thinking about how sad it was to be a black woman like peepee in canada.
#1 unbelievably horny because black.
#2 unbelievably ugly because black woman.
#conclusion SAD!
because mongolian, enoch talks about how lighter skin is a universal beauty standard, not down to colonialism, etc..
but that’s just one aspect of the beauty standard AND it’s not light skin per se.
it’s the much greater variety that comes with lighter skin.
that is, lighter skin increases the variance of beauty.
because darker skin “destroys contrast”…hides minor blemishes.
Lighter skin is usually attractive on females. Mostly because it’s paedomorphic. It’s the opposite for males. Hence why us brown boys get all the pussy.
AND what i’ve always heard is…
1. ca 2000 male models started to get a lot lighter and the women didn’t, BUT…
2. women prefer dark. men light. ceteris paribus.
why even the full osama and a cheeser are UN-Cynical in the original diogenic sense.
because a beard gets dirty. a beard is ONLY excusable when the hair can’t be cut either. the osama beard + long hair is gross and it feels dirty.
same with cheesers.
1. cheesers are ugly.
2. cheesers are dirty.
i remember i had a professor i used to fap about.
i was reading a blog and the author mentioned she’d become a blue-haired lesbian.
she’s still working as a professor of philosophy, so i sent her this email:
dear dyke,
like hannah arendt we both know you love my cock.
because not effeminate mongolian man.
i fantasize about meeting you and meat-ing you at a motel 6.
your red, engorged, bulbous, juicy pussy vs my meat cleaver.
then the cops come.
and you say, “too much pleasure! go away!”
and then your legs tremble and you exclaim, “how could any woman have sex with jordan peterson? it makes no sense!”
Hi, Pumpkin! What do you make of this study that links autism to high prenatal estrogen? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190729094538.htm
I’m confused. I thought it was linked to testosterone hence the extreme male brain theory
The study suggests that an excess of both testosterone and estrogens is linked to autism but estrogens are more predictive. It also surprisingly states “Contrary to popular belief that associates oestrogens with feminization, prenatal oestrogens have effects on brain growth and also masculinize the brain in many mammals.” That lines up with extreme male brain theory.
Also, where would you consider artists to lie within the neuro-spectrum? You say creativity is schizotypical but most artists seem to also have an “austistic” obsessiveness about their work. Or do all great geniuses have a mosaic brain?
I saw a study about higher scoring on creative achievement and divergent thinking and it found a correlation of both with higher scores on systemizing and empathizing index. It’s mean highly creative people are on avg more aspie and schizo than avg people.
I’m try to understand
A higher strogen exposure virtually cancel higher androgen exposure or both can express at the same time ??
Remember higher level of androgyny on asperger and autistic spectrum..
So schizophrenic spectrum means lower estrogen and androgen exposure??
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25191299
That’s actually quite interesting because I think that estrogens, androgens, etc. are the core basis of the way we live our lives, but they fluctuate everyday according to the weather or maybe other things. I think finding out how our endocrine system works would be the key to determining how the human mind works.
I agree LOADED. Dabbling in anabolics and practicing semen retention has made realize just how powerful androgens, and by extension pheromones, can be.
Excellent article pp, based on my research on the matter I have come to conclude the same although you seem to explain it much more clearly. Indeed this may very well be the case. The correlation of high IQ and incidents of autism and schizophrenia and high creativity are simply hard to ignore. It appears that grey to white matter ratio is the key in maintaining a well balanced brain while increasing overall size will give you the best of both worlds.
I’m glad you enjoyed it ph! Autism is an interesting disorder because although autism seems to lower IQ dramatically, super high IQ people seem to show more autistic traits or have more autistic relatives or at least it seems that way
Autism seems to be very closely aligned with a lack of interest in people and greater interest in things though one could be inclined to be like this yet not show any impairment in social intelligence(which seems to be the root cause/side effect of autism).
So I would say there are 3 types of people that exhibit autistic traits to full blown autism. First there is the type that seems to have heavily impaired cognitive faculties across the board but particularly on the social side(which seems to be a prerequisite for autism). Then we have high functioning autistic people or aspergers(though the term seems to no longer be used), these people only have impairments in their social intelligence but have better than average overall IQ, in some cases extremely high IQ. Finally we have the non social types, who seem to have a lack of interest in people but can readily interact with them with little to no difficulty. This last group often get confused with autistic people but they actually aren’t. In fact the typical male brain is designed to be more interested in things than people and the typical female brain is designed to be more interested in people than things. These people are in essence on the high end of a neurotypical male brain and have a lack of interest in people that may in some cases be confused with autism.
So where am i getting at, having a brain with a high IQ and be highly proficient in all things related to top tier academic fields basically comes at a cost. That cost is likely going to be on the social side though it is of course perfectly feasible that one can be highly proficient across the board even socially(this IMO will invariably require a much larger than average brain size, I cannot see how one can squeeze cognitively taxing things like visual IQ AND social intelligence into a small or average sized brain). So you get people who exhibit autistic traits due to a lack of interest in people but are otherwise very intelligent and you get people that exhibit autistic traits due to some fundamental brain deficiency(not simply due to lack of practice or use) but still possess a high IQ. Either way autism and high IQ seem to be somewhat linked perhaps even causally too(though the causal link may be slight).
Of course it may well be a lot more complicated than that as general intelligence is dependent on more things than just brain size, or even white matter and grey matter volume. Relative size of various brain regions matter too, level of myelination and efficiency of the circuitry and as i found out recently mitochondrial DNA matters as well(seems to be related to efficiency of energy release).
Schizophrenics see too much in patterns while autists too little. I may be reiterating what might’ve been said before but schizos are overly-analytical while autists have little to no analytical abilities. They can only observe what is going on around them and report back objectively.
This is one reason why autists may have such underdeveloped and nonexistent language skills, pattern recognition, and analytical tools to examine things with. That is always why true autists have such low IQs.
Asperger’s is the holy substitute that is there for true autism, which is a combination of schizo and autism-like tendencies.
You’ll see that Asperger’s is probably a mix of abnormal white and grey matter growth, either too much or too little of both. That’s where the spectrum of intelligence lies for Asperger’s people.
AS no longer exists in the most recent DSM because of lumpers. It’s unfortunate that they’re now grouping people who can max out Wechsler Comprehension but have affective problems with nonverbal tards.