Sometimes the younger generation of African Americans doesn’t appreciate the Genius of older black icons. They may think these elder icons are overrated.
One young woman attending a taping of The Oprah Winfrey Show had that attitude towards the great Toni Morrison, and Oprah was having none of it. Oprah got in her face like only Oprah can.
Toni Morrison: 1931 to 2019. RIP
Pumpkin Person 
What’s she say to Oprah?
Why did you ban my comment on what she said to oprah? How is that ‘insensitive’ explain.
Was it a legitimate answer or were you being a dick?
So stlll no answer on why the comment was moderated.
hahaha.
oprah is just mad that the younger negress doesn’t look like a [redacted by pp, sept 2, 2019]
oprah is so disgusting i can’t stand it.
now you tell me my sister…
and people think racism is bad why?
Prisoners are unbelievably racist. Apparently it maintains order.
Frankly Im surprised that Puppy can read Rushton or Steve Sailer and then at exact same time call random black celebs ‘legends’ and ‘geniuses’ because of what a supposedly high IQ tv talk show host said.
It just goes to show that the bar for evidence is much higher when a white person says it to puppy.
If a homeless black man smelling of urine walked up to puppy and told him he was the CEO of Citibank, Puppy would probably believe it. But not a homeless white man.
Imagine how low your social IQ must be to think rushton’s biggest fan has a pro-black bias.
Poor Puppy. Whenever I try to make sense of aspergers from an R/K perspective it doesn’t make sense. The model kind of predicts it. But in many ways it doesn’t. Especially the part about aspies and autistic retardates not being able to master their environment.
It doesn’t make senthhh.
It must be like the huntingtin model of playing chicken with genetics until you get as aspy as possible without going into retard ate territory
here’s the article from The Economist pill is citing.
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2015/03/05/a-faustian-bargain
unlike mere SNPs, repeat and copy number variation can have a maximum…past which one finds oprah non-revolting.
and by “dreadful” they mean a rare and bizarre illness…
but it’s better than dying from stomach cancer.
So this explains the contradication between chinas historically high pop size and their proposed K selection:
“Agriculture opened the way to an unprecendented expansion of food supplies and human populations that, in turn made cities and civilisation possible”.
Rushton, p22.
This also matches the historical knowledge we have of africa where there were barely any large towns or cities before Arabs and whites settled or made contact with blacks.
So in a way Rushton has shown that in an intertemporal sense, K selection can lead into R selection based purely on the success of the initial K selection making the organism a master of its environment and able to generate larger food surplus. But he doesn’t say that. Uncle Philosopher said that.
So I guess this also explains why RR has so many cognitive problems accepting the R/K dichtomy – maybe its not a dichotomy the longer the timespan you look.
Yes, R/K selection shift between one another. That is a phenomenon that will always occur. R selection allows all populations to breed more and have liberal social structures. That is why they end up annihilating K selected populations. Neanderthals were K-selected, humans are not. There is a clear distinction between Neanderthals and us. We’re extroverted, schizo, R selected people, whereas Neanderthals were introverted, autistic, and K selected.
I dunno if you’re really in touch with the black community, Pumpkin. There’s a lot of subconscious aspects to blacks that they deal with at all time that you need to keep in mind. One thing would be their worship of elderly or deceased family members. That is similar to their black ancestors animal worship.
Sorry, meant ancestor. Stupid autocorrect.
One thing I’ve noticed about humans in general is that most behavioral traits are almost impossible to try to control and most actions are already subconsciously determined. But it’s hard to tell since all people feign mental chess and mental success, if that makes sense. Most traits are just impulsive actions that happen because they’re there. And the more impulsive you are, the more those traits become actualized.
The moment someone starts over-thinking another person’s intentions they begin to go down the path of dumb and dumber.
Most people do have a reason or purpose for the actions they take, but they tend be one dimensional, selfish, or ego oriented. They are rarely if ever elaborate to the extent that most conspiracy theories try to take them.
i was thinking about that too.
unless you and LOADED let me fuck you to a hands free anal orgasm…
then RACISM!
and HOMOPHOBIA!
Case in point.
Mugabe lacks the self awareness to see the laziness of his response. Conspiracy theorists can only hand wave and stifle conversation.
Dumb people don’t know they’re dumb. Sad.
“Most people do have a reason or purpose for the actions they take, but they tend be one dimensional, selfish, or ego oriented. They are rarely if ever elaborate to the extent that most conspiracy theories try to take them.”
And that makes it easier for people who arent “most guys”.
“They are rarely if ever elaborate to the extent that most conspiracy theories try to take them”
But most people are willing to lie, get an educasion or socialize just to reach some meassily goals. If you are part of a 600 year old dynsaty with tradition and wisdom unheard of, as well as some para-psychology and incentive to do so for your kids, youll follow the familiy or get murdered by another clan member. Theres itehr components to why conspiracies get formed but to say that they are “too elaborate” isnt nescesarily true for all of the agents.
Oh yeah, excellent point, MeLo. If we gather enough information about the world, we find out that people are over-analyzing and coming up with overly-elaborate notions for how the world works.
Unfortunately, everything we know about the world comes from what we can explain in words…if a phenomenon exists that can’t be put together using our language-faculty portions of our brain, then it’s not something we can address directly or conceive of or even start to perceive in the intellectual sense. We may have intuition for it and thus act on it subconsciously, but the deeper we try to think of it, the more we become puzzled by it and lose our understanding of it.
Basically, the art of knowing is the art of knowing that all is all or nothing. Either you get an idea entirely or you don’t at all. Unfortunately, this throws everything off because we assume that you can attain knowledge of things partially without any consequence. However, most concepts are true to the idea that if you can conceive of its entirety, you can master it, but if you have some knowledge of it and don’t gain the entirety of the idea or concept that you wish to understand, you’ll end up with a confused state of mind that will be left searching for the full meaning of what you intended to understand.
If you can’t put into words what you want to understand, best leave it and try not to conceive of it at all because it will only taint your conceptions with misunderstanding. The more we put phenomenon that we can’t explain or conjure words up to describe into language-based concepts, the more we stray from the truth of the matter.
Loyalty and trust are the two craziest things in our society. Humans operate solely based on reciprocity. We believe that if something is human, we need to reciprocate with it to the fullest extent. So everything we do is just a way of gaining another’s trust and reaching our true potential. That’s why we do what we do in this world.
Honestly, when you start to understand that everything is crafted from the “golden rule,” you tolerate and resist bad behavior more often. We expect others to act the way we would want ourselves to act. And basically, superficial traits are a projection of how someone should act, while innate behaviors are ways in which a person wants to act. Unfortunately, life is just a projection of how others see us, conditioning ourselves to conform.
All behavior is basically a pattern, though the unfortunate part is that most patterns arise with different circumstances. Most people don’t like unique experiences because they have to do with a lack of pattern recognition. However, in a perfect world, we’d all be seeking novel experiences every time we did something. This is where existential crises stem from.
that study was so fake. a dozen siberians and arctic peoples’ skulls and only one chinese skull study…and it claimed the most advanced of ‘gina people, japs, have rr sized brains. but it wasn’t just pc. it was that this absurdity fit the climate/cranial capacity model. except it failed in the case of the aleuts…the aleutians are never very cold.
so you can see here: tall european bigger brain than south chinese…and europeans generally have the smallest facial skeleton…relative to rest of skull.
that’s a picture of two very rich men.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guo_Wengui
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Bass
and that shoe chicken example…
is there a human example?
a truly bizarre FACT:
in general small people live longer than large people and women live longer than men, but…
the world’s biggest men are also the longest lived (or a smidgen second after the swiss supposedly).
iceland (the most gender equal country) proves gender equality is good for men too?
iceland has the smallest gap in M vs F life expectancy of non-shit-hole muslim countries…only 2 years.
so if your wife makes 20% moe than you do that’s cool.
but if your wife makes 3x as much as you do…
you just feel like a man whore.
whereas if her husband makes all the money most women don’t mind because like being whores.
ignore the assumed dog perversion…
why does this one picture express everything mugabe has ever said?
pretend it’s a final exam question in an art citicism class at harvard…
what would you say?
i found this hint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyclqo_AV2M
NB: there IS a correct answer.
What does PP think of this?
polygenic scores are still in their infancy. They’re only about as accurate at predicting IQ as hat size.
Keep this one
Actually a commenter on RR’s blog showed that PGS had near perfect correlations to racial discrepancies in IQ.
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/5/htm?source=techstories.org
so does head size, but it’s still a weak correlation at the individual level. group level correlations tend to be much stronger than individual level because all the exceptions cancel out & you’re left with a high signal to noise ratio
“So does head size”
Source?
And how is that even relevant? We’re not discussing the correlation between two phenotypic traits instead we’re discussing genotypic differences in populations to the predicted phenotype of said populations.
I’m just using it as an example of how a biological variable (head size or polygenic score) can strongly correlate with IQ at the group level while only weakly correlating at the individual level. My source would be the cranial capacities & IQs Lynn gave for his 10 “races”
PP, it’s way more than PGS that’s the problem with the paper. What’re your thoughts?
The “corrections” for stratification don’t work; see the refs in Joseph’s article he just published yesterday.
https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/09/blueprint-genetic-determinism/
Also read Blueprint to see Plomin try to explain away his high PGS. It’s really funny.
Janssens and Joyner have also pointed out flaws in PGS as well. So I don’t see why we should take them seriously when they (1) explain so little variance; (2) are highly confounded; and (3) can’t get to function of the supposed genes that effect the trait in question.
This is just like the chopsticks example.
Also see Graham Coop’s newest article:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00892
“I’m just using it as an example of how a biological variable (head size or polygenic score) can strongly correlate with IQ at the group level while only weakly correlating at the individual level.”
I get that. I’m just wondering what could confound PGS on the individual level as the comparison between brain size and PGS that you are using doesn’t seem appropriate.
NB: they are NOT playing their own instruments in the vid.
reminds me of…
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow.
interesting how colletts address in may focused on the beauty of europeans…
but he didn’t make the next level touch.
europeans are mostly hideous.
it’s only that the very best looking europeans are the best looking.
reminds me…
extra-europe there are a very few marciano-walcott KOs…
all of them are japs.
there are a very small number of jap women who are KOs.
i’ve seen them.
this is why…
rome always wins…
in terms of body/physique vs talent vs heart…
MARCIANO IS THE GOAT…
AND IT ISN’T EVEN CLOSE!
Mike Tyson is the best boxer of all time.
yeah. that was funny, but seriously…
the (gay) prevailing aesthetic is the lower the body fat the better.
and this is TRUE. fat per se is gross.
it’s just that lean body mass and fat mass are NOT independent variables, so…
there ARE “fat” women and “fat” men who are sexy.
must say again…
the fat + sexy is VERY rare.
there’s only one girl irl in my experience it applied to.
a girl at the hill.
but the rarity makes it more attractive.
i mean…
it’s UN-believably hard to be fat and sexy at the same time.
it’s the same with an old woman.
the very fact that helen mirren is (was) still f—able is a yuge turn on…because rare.
the IDEAL straight white gentile man is…
The Right Stuff
and…
It’s a Wonderful Life
hint prime:
the peshat for the hard of seeing is a soldier helping bandage a dog’s leg.
most primitive level is…
man, dog is a metaphor for all the oppositions.
and yet…
why is the man helping the dog?
why is the dog injured?
why is there another dog in the upper right corner?
Only cucks deny climate change
Case in point:
Not gonna lie, for a 50-something woman Melania looks BAD (bad as in good, in the slang sense…)
I was shocked when I found out she was 50. She looks waaay younger.
She does look good for her age. But I wouldn’t be surprised if that was simply because of her money. Whites age terribly.
Dorothy Roberts is in her 60s. The old adage “black don’t crack” has a scientific basis.
Campiche et al (2019) write:
“There is differential manifestation of aging signs in different ethnic groups.
[…]
Our results show that Africans from the African continent show delayed signs of aging compared to Caucasians.
They found no differences in forehead wrinkles between Caucasians and Africans, though there was a difference in depth of forehead wrinkles. Blacks showed less advanced crow’s feet than whites, while also having less depth. There were no differences in mouth frown lines with the exception of depth and wrinkle surface and volume parameter, of which there was an increase in Caucasian subjects compared to African subjects. Though when it comes to the length, surface and vertical lines in African subjects they showed more advanced aging but there was no difference in depth between the races. Caucasians had bigger nasiolabial folds (smile or laugh lines) than Africans, regarding length, surface, depth and volume. Africans had deeper pores than Caucasians. Africans had a greater homogeneity than Caucasians when it came to skin color. (Note that the cohorts came from France and Mauritius.)”
Campiche et al (2019: 12) write:
“This is also in line with the fact that photoaging in African Americans does not appear until the late fifth or sixth decade of life.22 This may explain why aging in our Black African cohort from Mauritius is less pronounced than in the Caucasian cohort although the Black African cohort is older.
[…]
The difference in age between our Caucasian and Black African cohorts (median age 46 years vs 56 years) could bring into question the comparisons of the two cohorts. Nevertheless, we mostly found that Caucasians displayed more severe signs of aging than Black Africans which is in line with the common understanding that the onset of aging in fair skin starts earlier than in darkly pigmented skin and that there were differences in the appearance of lip lines and facial pores.”
So differences between the two ethnic groups come down to facial site, and measurement parameter. This study further buttresses the point that, at least when it comes to certain ethnic groups, whites age faster than blacks—even when the whites are younger than blacks (46 compared to 56 years, respectively).
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/05/12/black-and-white-skin/
But thats the thing: most 50-something white women in the public eye have some sort of plastic surgery (even a lot the men). But does Melania show indications of having had plastic surgery? I dont see any (like a weirdly stretched or alien eyes). Maybe im missing something.
*weirdly stretched face
She looks plastic to me. Like she’s had a lot of work done.
Italian women age really gracefully.
HH looks Italian. Could RR’s promotion of her theory be an example of EGI?
Nigga, she’s Brazilian
it’s just a function of skin and sun. oily dark skin ages more slowly. men have thicker skin so men’s skin ages more slowly.
other signs of aging are muscle atrophy and fat. the first lady’s eyes are fubar, but her body is fine.
if you can stand to look at old people’s bodies what you see is basically fat invading/replacing muscle.
and total muscle mass can increase even to the early 40s in trained individuals.
so if the first lady gave us her exercise routine you might see she’s not faded much in max lifts and mile time.
and again if you can stand to look at old people naked…you’d see that the lower body atrophies much faster than the upper body.
italian women age gracefully because not fat and the southern ones are swarthy so less sun damage.
but so much of purely aesthetic aging is just down to decades of inactivity/dis-suetude.
but then once one has reached a certain level of neglect what one has lost becomes impossible to restore.
best exercise for staying sexy is the squat.
it’s not just (((media))).
according to sailer, yaeger is still alive. and feeling like a loser. https://www.unz.com/isteve/charles-darwins-humblebrag/
the very idea that melo can brag about white women telling him brown boys are “better at sex”…
is an ABSTRACTION…
Melo is scared and confused. It might sound like he is saying random nonsense, but this is only a defensive behaviour. Think about what life would be like if you were not very bright: Everything in the newspapers or CNN would seem credible, even intellectually stimulating. Sleeping with hookers would eventually lead to STDs. His body and physiological state would be near collapse from a diet of Dunkin Donuts and Coca Cola. His family would be deeply embarrassed about him and try to keep him indoors as much as possible. All his ‘friends’ would laugh at him and tell jokes about him behind his back. It would basically be like Flowers for Algernon.
Life isn’t easy for Melo. But that is why those of us with more sense need to help our less fortunate colleagues with special needs navigate through oft treacherous terrain.
“mElO dUmB!!”
Philosopher angrily typed from his mother’s basement while shoving a handful of Doritos in his mouth and washing it down with Mountain Dew
Brown boys being better at sex is just a fact of life, like Russia gate or your low IQ.
The white women who’ve ventured far enough know this. That’s why they rarely go back.
that makes no sense.
the very idea of sex as sport is dumb.
Sex as sport? Are you retarded? If you don’t make an effort to please your women then there is no wonder why you’re a cuck
So many good games coming in the next 2 few months: Gears 5, Planet Zoo, Age of Empires 2 Definitive Edition, Borderlands 3. Oh my god, I think Ill have to quit my job to have more time to play.
I’m excited for cyber punk 2077 and ancestors a human odyssey
Yesss. That game looks so fucking cool.
Have you seen the newest trailer?
For which game? I’m usually not into futuristic games (besides fallout) but because they’re the same people who made Witcher ima give it a chance, plus I love open world rpgs
^^^an example of why mugabe is 10x sexier than y’all^^^
?? I get head while playing red dead redemption 2.
Mugabe is too decrepit for this blog.
so i’m totally down with video games which are basically a PIQ test…
but when i have to read books about it…
i quit.
this is a yuge problem with games as IQ test battery subtests…
two people who’ve just learned the rules…
vs two who’ve play-ed a long time…
it’s a WEAK correlation.
so you watch the best play and you think…
jesus f—ing christ that’s insane!
how does he do that?
it would only work if you control for experience (i.e. only include people who have’t played or only include obscure games few have played)
https://news.efinancialcareers.com/uk-en/323562/marty-chavez-demoted-from-cfo-goldman-sachs
Interesting story this. Apparently this Chavez character was the no.2 choice to be CEO of Goldman Sachs before a jew took the job. I think Chavez has a right to feel pissed off that he was passed over for being a latino and not jewish.
Course the article doesn’t say that. I’m just reading between the lines. It seems he was overqualified for the job based on merit.
He was also gay funnily enough. I’m not sure whether that helped him or hindered him in the jewish establishment. Its very hard sometimes trying to figure out what jews actually think about a certain demographic.
Someone here who doesn’t like Solomon :
https://dealbreaker.com/2019/09/goldman-sachs-marty-chavez-retiring-again
Blankfein is definitely a fag/pedo
“what jews think” isn’t a thing mossad agent.
“what jews pretend to think in order to increase their own power” is a thing.
un-mixed latinos are notoriously gay.
but they come with the yuge cache of successfully exploiting the indigenes for 500 years.
un-mixed europeans of latin america are another “market dominant minority”.
read this book and stop being a mossad agent:
but i did learn yesterday that indonesia (the world’s 4th most populous country) has only like 2.5m chinese.
the % chinese is actually a good correlate of GDP per capita.
so GDP per capita: singapore > malaysia > thailand > indonesia
this recapitulates the pattern in the new world and africa. namely, the whiter the richer.
Hispanics are always mixed.
and apparently i meant cachet not cache.
oh well.
reminds me of how so many saudi princes frequent bathhouses in nyc.
or so claimed peter theroux.
the theroux family is interesting. it can’t be down to genetic VIQ only.
how do peepee and other hereditardians explain the theroux family?
Just something I noticed about the current Fed Chair:
Between 1990 and 1993, Powell worked in the United States Department of the Treasury, at which time Nicholas F. Brady, the former chairman of Dillon, Read & Co., was the United States Secretary of the Treasury. In 1992, Powell became the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance after being nominated by George H. W. Bush.[15][17][14] During his stint at the Treasury, Powell oversaw the investigation and sanctioning of Salomon Brothers after one of its traders submitted false bids for a United States Treasury security.[18] Powell was also involved in the negotiations that made Warren Buffett the chairman of Salomon.[19]
In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work for Dillon, Read & Co
FYI, Dillon Read was the gentile Goldman Sachs. Plenty of Treasury Secretaries come from it. Notice the way the current Fed Chair had a direct role in taking down Solomon Brothers. Jerome Powell is establishment 101.
When I read finance history books like Liars Poker, or a book I bought recently -barbarians at the gate – Im reading it like a person who wants to know more about the elites, i.e. the people that tell the politicians what to do. The stories are incidental.
Rushton’s book is very solid. But a lot of people would be deterred from reading it because it reads like a Lit Review rather than a book. It would be great if a journalist rewrote the book to make it friendlier to people like Melo. Rushton only starts writing normally about 10 chapters in when discussing the Single Origination v Multiple Origination Theories of the races of man.
The conclusion of the book is anodyne – race behaviour is 50% genetic 50% environment roughly. Everybody should accept this.
“. race behaviour is 50% genetic 50% environment roughly. Everybody should accept this.“
Except anyone with even an elementary grasp on biology
Mugabe is 100% correct about reaction norms, as far as he defines it. I don’t see a contradiction between believing in it and also believing that some behaviors are based on genetics. Its not so different to epigenetic theory, which I also believe in. But biologists have to be politically correct and pretend everyone is a blank slate because [redacted by pp, sept 4, 2019].
You do realize most biologists are genetic reductionists correct?
you do realize that so many women eschew weight lifting because fear of looking like a man…
reality:
1. upper body muscle in a woman soon becomes gross.
2. lower body muscle in a woman almost never becomes gross..
because…
untrained women have about 2/3ds the lower body strength of men but only 1/3d the upper body strength.
a woman who can squat 300lbs is sexy.
a woman who can bench 300lbs is usually gross.
Dude you are fucking insane. Get a life.
and i speak from experience:
all of the post mario-cart/bond video games have been gay.
the non-gay point of video games is they’re a PIQ challenge.
so the old arcade games were like sports.
the mavens of kong were jocks.
not quite, but…
relative to today…
quite!
Do any of you remember when Mugabe said long haired women were unattractive?
Mugabe is a closet homosexual or a transvestite. There are no other options.
There are no other options.
LOL! As Mug of Pee himself would say.
Lol forreal I’ve never met somebody that was so obviously a faggot.
It’s as ironic as philo calling me a dumbass.
No self awareness yet dumb and dumber pride themselves on their “social IQ”
Sad.
But all the girls he consideres beautifull have had luscious hair (ingrid for instance)?
He used the non hair thing as a analogy and for humor.
I feel like im the only one who gets mugabe, but i think pp could if he tried to (but i dont recomend it).
What’s the analogy?
Mugabe is not complex.
What’s the link between working memory and fluid intelligence? Apparently, training it using strategies transfers to working memory capacity itself because of near transfer, but there’s no far transfer (because high WM capacity people use strategies).
Pumpkin, is there a way to measure short term auditory memory besides digit span or letter span? I kind of practiced them way too much, and I can’t find any other way to measure my memory properly.
Pumpkin, I did an OSPAN task, and I got pretty much the same score as I do on other Working Memory tests. Apparently this is a complex working memory task, and my strategy works for it- so, can this score be called my definitive score?
This is how dumb mugabe is:
it’s obvious at this point that melo is just pretending to be a retarded filipino. hahaha. very funny. melo = peepee.
the person who made this cartoon is either retarded or trolling low IQ people like melo.
the professor’s list has nothing to do with global warming.
and filipinos have nothing to say. they can’t stop shitting out babies.
it’s obvious at this point that melo is just pretending to be a retarded filipino. hahaha. very funny. melo = peepee.//
the person who made this cartoon is either retarded or trolling low IQ people like melo.
the professor’s list has nothing to do with global warming.
and filipinos have nothing to say. they can’t stop shitting out babies.
ALL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS ARE DUE TO TOO MANY PEOPLE.
melo’s an example of how mongolians brainwash dumb people like melo by making them think they’re smart.
Whatever you say faggot. Come back when your social IQ is as high as mine.
questioning people who say that everything will be better if something that hasnt been tried is to be tried seems to be something a smart person would do.
In this context it’s not. Making the world a better place should be accomplished no matter the reason. Try using some critical thinking for a change.