The video below, from The Oprah Winfrey show 20th anniversary DVD, paints a rare glimpse of Oprah’s talk show roots. In the mid 80s she was hired to host a local morning low budget talk show in Chicago, that was airing in the same time slot (and right down the street) from the great Phil Donahue, who at the time, was the number one (daytime) talk show in the country.
No one in their wildest dreams thought Oprah would ever beat Donahue. For he was the best in the country and she was black (which was considered really bad in the 1980s), female, and overweight.
“I don’t know another overweight jheri curl person who can say ‘I made it!'” laughs Oprah.
Not only did she make it, but she would go on to become the World’s ONLY black billionaire and the most influential woman on the planet.
Not bad for an overweight jheri curl!
When Oprah first arrived in Chicago she had so little clout she had to bribe strangers on the street to sit in her audience with heat and doughnuts.
My favorite part of the below clip is when she says “We were successful IMMEDIATELY! We were so successful, so quickly, it was STUNNING…”
Pumpkin Person 
Humans are basically opportunists. Self-sacrifice and group fitness are not something that’s relevant to the human mind. If it benefits the individual, then it’s keen enough to go through.
Simpler shit could not be said.
Oprah is just that….an opportunist. A remarkable one, actually. She saw multiple opportunities and took it with no shame, no guilt, and a fistful of pride when it was offered to her.
Human beings, to a remarkable extent, are only known for manipulating situations to their advantage. The idea of truth to a human is nonexistent. Until a human labels something as being true, it lives in ambiguity as a nonexistent entity. Humans basically frame the world and give it context. And humans then give validation towards other living things that can then give context to the actions of humans.
Brilliant way of devising a loop in which humans have access to control of anything around them.
Oprah isn’t an opportunist. She was chosen. The people that decide who will be the tv show host or presenter or lead actor/actress decide who gets the opportunities. Most of the time they will try to fit in at least 1 black person even if the context is completely not suitable. Lately they have now been promoting openly homosexual and soon transexual characters to be the talking heads on tv. Even the sports coverage now has female tv pundits who have no experience in the sport they are talking about.
Basically if you are black and have an IQ over 100, the world is your oyster. Barack Obama wouldn’t have got near the nomination if he was white with the exact same CV.
She wasn’t chosen shit-for-brains. She was the most qualified person for the job because her local Baltimore show was beating donahue in the Baltimore market so she was the only person who might be able to get some audience in chicago. Many white hosts were tried first but none of them worked. Oprah single-handedly took AM Chicago from dead last in the ratings to #1 overnight.
And you would never describe your God George Soros as being chosen, it’s only blacks that are described that way. Reality is successful people of all races and ethnic groups are given opportunities by more powerful people, yet you’re so incredibly racist that you see all 40 million African Americans as just mindless pawns of your Jewish Gods incapable of creating their own success.
Where is your data showing the world is your oyster if you’re a triple digit black? Blacks are 13% of America yet always much less than 1% of the Forbes 400 richest Americans. By contrast Jews are 2% of America yet 35% of the Forbes 400. Yes they’re overrepresented among celebs but that wasn’t true in Oprah’s day, and fame means nothing unless you turn it into real wealth and influence as Oprah did.
Oprah was 100% chosen. Nobody accidentally ends up on tv. Whereas Soros making money actually depends on objective metrics and real life events, Oprah was shunted into the role because she was black and could speak normally unlike most fat black women. They probably spent years interviewing and searching for the 1 black woman who could sound normal.
Oprah was given her first job in TV by some southern hick, she wasn’t chosen by the elite like soros. Nobody accidentally ends up at the London school of economics which is the gatekeeper to the financial elite
Oprah wasn’t chosen, but I think Phil’s world-is-your-oyster point is valid for blacks with >130 IQs. Most people (even conservatives) want to see qualified blacks and other minorities succeed, even if it’s at the expense of perfect meritocracy.
I grew up in suburban Los Angeles, and during the ’08 election I can’t count the number of times I heard something to the effect of “Yeah, I like McCain, but America really needs a black president.”
https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2019/09/07/israels-arab-citizens-could-hold-the-key-to-political-change
So this is actually a balanced article on the cause of the arabs living in Israel as second class citizens. This is probably the first article on this topic I’ve seen in (((western media))).
Puppy what are your thoughts on arabs being in the Israeli government. Do you agree with Netanyahu’ 2018 law which declared Israeli a ‘jewish state’? If so how do you marry that to your convictions that you are against racism?
I don’t agree with Netanyahu.
Pumpkin how do you hold all these contradictions together in your head? Youre liberal but support Israel’s right to subjugate arabs. Youre pro homosexual and yet you wouldn’t actually be open to living with one. You’re pro HBD and anti racist. You obsess about IQ but also call it a ‘social construction’.
LOL! I don’t support Israel’s treatment of Arabs. You just make shit up. And there’s no contradiction whatsoever between being pro-HBD & anti-racist. Jensen was the perfect example of both.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2019/08/31/iq-board-games-test-construction/#comment-140974
Look at these questions you asked only 4 days ago. And yet you lost the memo. You need to check your brain health philo. You might be in danger.
Puppy what are your thoughts on the replacement theory of ‘far right’ people the media seems to be mentioning more. If its true that (((certain politicial actors))) really want to try to replace the white population with losers like Melo and Loaded, where do you stand on that as a white person? Obviously this may effect your potential children and family relations as well. So would you still be open borders if you knew for a fact that it was true?
What do all these things have in common:
1) promotion of homosexuality
2) affirmative action
3) mass immigration
4) feminism
They all decrease white population size. So Occam’s razor…
This isn’t an answer Puppy. Do you or do you not agree with ‘replacement theory’ if it is indeed what is going on and if so, how do you square that with your anti racist, socially hippie pro establishment views.
Yes I believe the theory. But it has no effect on my views. Just because an aggressive elite wants to exploit racial tolerance for nefarious reasons is no reason for me to be racist
White fertility rates started to decrease BEFORE all these things… Italian fertility rates right now are extremely lower, specially among ethnic natives.. BUT, Italy is not a super progressive place anyway. Think about CAPITALISM [lack of support of middle class families + increasing of exploitation … $hit$hit$hit] + rural exodus.
I wouldn’t comment here ANYMORE but you’re so stupid and i’m always anxious to CORRECT bullshities & assholes.
1. Is not race based. Liberal/developed countries tend to have tolerance for homo sexuality. There’s plenty of gay blacks and I actually don’t see much discrimination as far as that’s concerned
2. This is why replacement theory is dumb. AA=more educated blacks. Higher education=less children.
3. Mass immigration does not decrease white population size. It just changes the proportion of population sizes.
4. This is just dumb. This is not race based. Feminism is a world wide movement.
homosexuality and AA don’t decrease the white population.
These are just transgressive/victim-group causes. That’s what they have in common.
mass immigration may not reduce white fertility rates. but it does decrease the white pop as a % share of the general pop in any country whites dominate.
So PP is right to include this in her list.
I agree with what you say, but replacement theory suggest white populations are decreasing universally. None of the suggested mechanisms are actually doing this.
The biggest threat to white fertility is their own intelligence, which all races will eventually succumb to if they actually increase in development.
Well reasoned Santo, but once looking into more socialist governments like Cuba, modern Germany, Denmark the Soviet states etc you see low fertility rates too. conservative centrist states like Iran or libanon also got low fertility rates. It has to do with cultural norms+capital-Distractions/media. cultural norms is conservatism and the media you consume. The media increases the marginal cost of having extra kids. Capital means the necessity of having kids, in the past kids were capital and insurance.
Iceland had a replacement fertility rate 10 years ago.
Thinking Mouse, i know Eastern Germany had already lower fertility rates as well ex URSS, but they were quite average like natality rates around 13, 2 per 1000… Romania by Ceausescu had very3 high fertility rate in 80’s. Urban places often drop fertility rates, specially without higher mortality rates. In the western case, excesses of capitalism (an excess itself) increasing standard living because super production of moslty unimportant products make Life expensive specially for middle classes.
How media distract young people to have kids??? Lower class people are those who consume more media…
Economy is the structure of society. I don’t deny cultural changes have some impact but no way all impact.
“Thinking Mouse, i know Eastern Germany had already lower fertility rates as well ex URSS, but they were quite average like natality rates around 13, 2 per 1000… ”
Im not suprised. If you knew about fertility rates in the 1930´s you probably know about the ones in the 1950-1990´s.
Romania by Ceausescu had very3 high fertility rate in 80’s. Urban places often drop fertility rates, specially without higher mortality rates.
Romania went crazy. If the west acted like romania did theyd probably be at like 2,9 children per woman.
“In the western case, excesses of capitalism (an excess itself) increasing standard living because super production of moslty unimportant products make Life expensive specially for middle classes.”
I forgot to add that, thats true. Thats porbably a big part on to how iceland managed to have above replacement fertility rates.
How media distract young people to have kids??? Lower class people are those who consume more media…
Economy is the structure of society. I don’t deny cultural changes have some impact but no way all impact.
By media i meant individuation, some people find relatively more enjoyment in having extra hobbies and “missions” compared to having a family and will invest less resources in kids, but also value their kids individuation, increasing the cost of the kids. Much of this is due to “moslty unimportant products”, which is why is said media.
I think we agree.
The negative correlation between individuation and fertility rates means dysgenics since low psychopathy, highly engaged imaginative and abstract high iq people get less kids, while high/medium iq psychopaths get more by gaining money and shagging women without condoms.
”Im not suprised. If you knew about fertility rates in the 1930´s you probably know about the ones in the 1950-1990´s.”
I don’t understand this part. In the 30’s Germany was in the nazi plague with ”ideal family number” around 5 kids [so smart isn’t* how a family and a nation can manage higher fertility rates in the modern or more structured environments*].
”Romania went crazy. If the west acted like romania did theyd probably be at like 2,9 children per woman.”
And now Romania have
lowest fertility rates
higher levels of migration
of well educated folks
and and
higher fertility rates of roma gypsy. Poor wallachians…
”I forgot to add that, thats true. Thats porbably a big part on to how iceland managed to have above replacement fertility rates.”
Yes, a country where harsh climate make expensiveness look like what it is in reality.
Today Robert Mugabe died. A fine statesman. A very high IQ leader. And someone that was intensely xenophobic to the white minority but was never held up by the jewish western media as an example of the universal behaviour of tribalism.
Not only that, but he fought against an economic and social elite furnished by jews while having blue eyes and a hitler moustache. Mugabe really is the african reincarnation of hitler.
The reality about mugabe is that he is a jesuit/zion chinese communist party puppet to strengthen the asiatic zion horde.
This might suprise Philo
From wikipeida:
“The British writer Peter Fleming visited Manchukuo in 1935, and while riding a train through the countryside of Manchukuo, a group of Japanese colonists mistook his Swiss traveling companion Kini for a Russian refugee, and began to beat her up.[79] It was only after Fleming was able to prove to the Japanese that she was Swiss, not Russian, that the Japanese stopped and apologized, saying that they would never had beaten her up if they had known she was Swiss, saying that they sincerely believed she was a Russian when they assaulted her.[79] Fleming observed that in Manchukuo: “you can beat White Russians up till you are blue in the face, because they are people without status in the world, citizens of nowhere”.[80] Fleming further noted that the Japanese in Manchukuo had a strong dislike of all white people, and because the Russians in Manchukuo were stateless without an embassy to issue protests if they were victimized, the Japanese liked to victimize them.”
Youll notice that monsters in east asian traditions have middle eastern/black/white eyes and noses.
Now they are retarded like this:
Yes Pumpkin, we need a Robert Mugabe IQ estimate.
okay i’ll try 🙂
People agree with me about Oprah looking almost exactly like a gorilla. Why are you trying to hide this? You think people can’t see it? Idiot.
Yawn. People have been using that insult against blacks since anthropoid apes were first discovered. The fact that she didn’t meet western beauty standards makes her success even more impressive
One big aspect of different crime rates between the races porbably is that the lower iq ones have a harder time concealing the evidence. or not.
I wonder what Oprah would think of this blog. She has probably been pretty strongly conditioned to regard any mention of race differences as irredeemably racist, which is understandable.
But maybe PP is nuanced enough about it that he’d get off the hook. Hope she discovers it some day.
PP nuanced?? No way
I think Pumpkin has previously stated Oprah is a highly manipulative sociopath (as are most billionaires). As such, she probably holds fairly racist/realistic views about humanity, but of course she dares not speak the truth on these views, lest she wants to see her whole media empire and professional career destroyed.
This is the type of retard Philo is:
Oprah Oprah Oprah Oprah….always oprah!!!!
Ow that mugabe is dead, anybody who tries to comment as him is clearly an imposter. Good riddance. The average IQ of this blog just shot up.