On page 206 of Bias in Mental Testing, Arthur Jensen writes:
Not sure why Jensen considers all these correlations positive, unless zero is a positive number (I consider it neutral).
And I’m not sure why some commenters think weight lifting requires coordination when the correlation between strength (hand grip, chinning) and coordination (Pursuit rotor tacking, Mirror star tracing) is zero.
But maybe these are not the best measures of strength or coordination (mirror star tracing sounds more like a cognitive test than a physical one), but when I lift weights, I don’t feel like I’m using coordination. To me coordination is best measured by very fast paced tasks that require moving multiple body parts with exquisite timing.
Physical coordination probably correlates more with IQ than does any other physical ability. Daniel Seligman writes:
Contrary to certain stereotypes about athletes and intellectuals, physical coordination is positively correlated with IQ. Technical studies by the U.S. department of Labor report a 0.35 correlation between coordination and cognitive ability.
0.35 is very similar to the correlation between IQ and brain size; so there are at least two physical traits (brain size and coordination) that correlate moderately with IQ.
Some might argue that physical coordination is a part of intelligence since it’s largely a brain function. I define intelligence as the ability to use whatever physical traits one has as a tool to exploit whatever environment one’s in. I see coordination as one of those physical traits used as a tool by intelligence rather than part of intelligence itself, but it’s a meta-tool in that it controls the body which in turn controls the external environment.
The problem with including physical coordination in our definition of intelligence is that intelligence is only important because it’s what separates man from beast, and physical coordination fails to do that. Even if it were possible to put a man’s brain in a cheetah’s body, he would not be able to exploit the environment because his brain’s not evolved to control the cheetah’s body. But if a man’s brain could control what the cheetah did with its motor control, only then would the cheetah display the goal directed adaptive behavior we know as intelligence.
It’s like the Master Blaster character in Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome. If Master’s brain was literally put in Blaster’s body, he might not have the coordination to win so many fights, but by telling Blaster how to use his coordination, he has given him his mind.
Feelings control intelligence
Intelligence is often defined as the mental ability to problem solve, but something is only a problem if it’s bothering us (i.e. cause us to feel pain or discomfort). Hence, feelings define the problems we use our intelligence to solve.
Intelligence controls physical coordination
Once our intelligence decides what behavior will solve a problem most efficiently, our physical coordination must direct our muscle movements accordingly. One could argue coordination itself is a mental ability and thus part of intelligence however by definition, abilities are only mental if they don’t cluster with sensory or motor functions, and physical coordination clusters with the latter. Even though coordination is part of the brain, it’s not fully part of the mind. It’s more neurological than mental per se.
Physical coordination controls the body
This is true by definition
Body controls external reality
This is self-explanatory
diverticulitis caused by chronic anal sex in steam rooms is sad. said:
trinucleotide repeats cause huntington’s and other fatal ataxias, and they occur at younger and younger ages because age of onset is correlated with length of repeat and the repeat allele is unstable and often increases in length one generation to the next. so it could be one of their parents simply didn’t have enough repeats or would have shown symptoms had he/she lived longer. but all three siblings being afflicted with an autosomal dominant trait should happen only 12.5% of the time. anyway, aunt will be dead soon. and my brother and i are her heirs…i wonder if she has any money left. she used to own a condo in aspen.
huntington’s often has psychiatric symptoms, but always together with or only shortly before the physical symptoms. the other ataxias i haven’t read have any psychiatric issues. my grandfather developed manic depression very late, in his 50s, and after a heart attack, so it was likely due to brain damage from hypoxia during the heart attack.
the huntington’s mutant protein is produced throughout the body but is only damaging to a small subset of brain cells. these neurons die and the symptoms follow.
interesting is transgenic rats with huntington’s display less fear, greater extroversion before developing symptoms. in that case my brother is affected and i’m safe.
Oprah-me (true philosopher essential aesthetics prevail's) said:
Nothing new here… You belong to mental ill relatives, and you’re ill himself… But you think psychology ir psychiatry is fake, less when it’s about homossexuality…
A supposed heterossexual male to be obsessed with anus of homossexual males sound suspicious, at the least… And even worse when you no have a partner..
You insist here even you supposedly despise this blog…
so long it's been good to know ya. said:
but it would be interesting if it turned out this was a mutation which had substantial cognitive enhancing effects. gaucher’s is supposed to have such an effect, but it may not. it would be the first such allele with a substantial positive effect. aunt also graduated harvard.
no one knows why. said:
but even greater than 40 CAG repeats is not 100% penetrant. just 99%. that is, even if the carrier lives long enough there is a very small probability he will never develop symptoms. no one knows why.
i’ve mentioned this before.
The Philosopher said:
Huntingtons is related to brain growth. People with high CAG repeats tend to be a lot smarter. Think puppy is right that your family has a ‘tay-sachs problem’.
the belgian trappists make the world's best beer. said:
the “dynamic mutation” is another subtlety HBDers can’t grok or simply aren’t aware of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_mutation
this means that all families, all human genomes, slide toward pathological repeats, but in any one generation only a small percentage will show symptoms, because those who show symptoms are really bad at reproducing…a truncated distribution.
that is, it is impossible to eliminate trinucleotide repeat disorders via breeding…only via embryo testing.
The Philosopher said:
I think if you were the get every single 125+ IQ person and go through their family records you’d find 50% of them have some autism, schizophrenia, huntington, tay-sach or as yet not linked to intelligence brain diseases in their families.
Which shows evolution is not about promoting more intelligent humans per se.
so let it be written. so let it be done. thank you for shopping at walmart. said:
more likely slightly fewer “issues”.
The Philosopher said:
I think they did a study on high IQ and mating habits and found high IQ people lose their virginity much later. An autistic person would say thats because they chose it to be like that after consulting their actuary tables.
A normal person would infer that its probably because intelligence is linked to one of the mental deformities above.
inside a dog it's too dark to read. said:
no.
if true there are at least 4 other obvious reasons.
1. smart people are focused on school when they’re young.
2. smart people have smart parents who disapprove of sex for fun and teen mom is super trashy.
3. smart people aren’t as interested in sex, because they are interested in other things too.
4. smart people find dumb people UN-attractive. so the pool of fuck buddies is much smaller.
The Philosopher said:
My mother is an idiot and basically an animal with no ability to self reflect or see herself from another persons perspective. So im not sure my schizotypal/paranoid type symptoms are related to intelligence.
I do know that having a very high verbal IQ is linked neurosis. So I extrapolate a bit and conclude schiz type problems.
Oprah-me (true philosopher essential aesthetics prevail's) said:
Your mother look like you…
or that's what my psychology professors told me. said:
they aren’t. the overwhelming weight of evidence is IQ and psychiatric disorders of all kinds are unrelated, except for schizophrenia, where smart people have one quarter the risk of dumb people.
The Philosopher said:
I remember being in geography class and the teacher saying people have more babies because they need more workers and people to support them in old age blah blah blah actuary tables.
Then one of the guys said “maybe it because they like having sex”.
^^^^
Instinct FTW!!!!!
The Philosopher said:
Rubenstein has a really good series of 1 to 1 interviews with business leaders on Bloomberg.
If you look at his face you can tell he has a high verbal IQ. He has that kind of ‘snob look’.
Another interesting thing about Ruby is that hes a key person in the CFR. This is another example of why I think elites are on the whole more humane than the type of people that ran the soviet union or Pre-Nixonite America.
but every rich man wants his children to be doctors. hmmm. said:
more humane?
surely you’re joking mr feynman?
or you don’t know what “humane” means.
RaceRealist said:
If anyone has any knowledge on this – what do you think of intermittent fasting?
King meLo said:
In your expert opinion, is it better (in regards to losing weight) to fast every two days or 16 hours?
RaceRealist said:
Would you be weight training too, as to minimize muscle loss during weight (fat) loss?
I use fasting as a tool for the people I work with so they can understand what true hunger is. Most people eat because they are on a schedule – when normally eat is when your hunger hormones “go off” and make you feel “hungry.” So, let’s say person A eats every 3 hours. They have trained themselves to be hungry at those times. One of the main hunger hormones is ghrelin. You can control that hormone by fasting.
Personally, I do 16 hour fasts daily and I do a 24 hour fast once a week while cutting to speed up the fat loss process (I thought about flirting with an EC/A stack [ephedrin from Broncaid, caffeine and aspirin] but I was kinda scared. It revs your metabolism up so that you burn about 400 more kcal per day.)
When you say “fasting every two days”, do you mean 3 24 hour fasts a week? There are many different protocols. I think you should look into Brad Pilon’s Eat, Stop, Eat for the 24 hour fast two times a week and Martin Berkhan’s Leangains for a daily 16 hour fast to get strong as fuck while getting shredded.
King meLo said:
“Would you be weight training too, as to minimize muscle loss during weight (fat) loss?”
Oh it’s not for me. I’ve just been curious because I’ve seen it popping up more often in other forums. I’ve been doing the 16 simply because I feel way better physically when I regulate my eating habits. Within those 8 i still try to eat near 4,000 calories. I’m not out of shape. Though that may not last, as I’ve been drinking more lately
The Philosopher said:
Heartiste says autophagy works better when you do this. Im not an nutrition person so im agnostic.
RaceRealist said:
He’s right – autophagy is the mechanism in which old, degraded cells are eliminated by the body. It destroys those cells. Fasting is solid for way more than just the benefits of autophagy, of course.
see. not all southern italians are retarded. said:
the expert on this topic is a man of calabrian extraction named valter longo.
LOADED said:
People on the west coast lean towards schizo thinking patterns, the northeast is very autistic, even the immigrants from fuckin Latin American countries are autistic. The mideest is very old-timey and backwards. The South is a true melting pot, with a monoculture filled with black influence. None are good.
LOADED said:
Ive never lived in the NW, but Ive lived in every other region. America never used to be like this.
RaceRealist said:
PP – what the hell with these ads? I get taken to idiotic websites randomly on my phone while browsing your blog, literally at random without clicking on anything. Why?
pumpkinperson said:
You’re probably touching the screen before the screen finishes loading thus touching the add without realizing it.
LOADED said:
Pumpkin, why wasnt my comment posted?
pumpkinperson said:
Not sure which one you’re referring to. I know I found one of your comments vulgar so I moderated for that reason, but overall you get moderated far less often than most other commenters.
Billy said:
I’m not sure how a topic on physical coordination gets 341 posts, but if you’re moderating 341 posts I commend you.
RaceRealist said:
How many of the comments are about physical coordination, though?
LOADED said:
No, sorry, it was the one about America and my beliefs about how different people function.
I’ll abstain from commenting anything that might be vulgar. Sorry if I’ve done so in the past, haha.
LOADED said:
*midwest
LOADED said:
I think empathy is more lateral thinking than anything else. I think understanding peoples’ motives is rather a tricky thing to do and doesn’t necessarily involve patterns because people are very good at switching up their motives as to elude from being caught in their schemes. I think people require patterns to a certain degree, but when trying to find a motive behind something, you need to really position yourself in their shoes, and that requires you to think outside of a box and try to think subjectively. This can be done by thinking one step above a person, almost like chess, but also adjust to the pace the other person is going at to really beat them. Otherwise, people catch on to what you’re doing. Social interactions are mainly coming across as competent, dependable, and successful in pursuing a common goal. For the ones that don’t fit an altruistic framework, people have to play some sort of mental chess against the other person. That’s why we mentally masturbate, as to sharpen our tools to truly come out on top when it comes to mental and psychological warfare.
Ray Penver said:
Hi, PP! It’s me again
I wonder what would be your estimation of Isaac Newton’s IQ.
I know quite a bit about his life.
He’s considered the best physicist and scientist ever, one of the best mathematicians ever and one of the most influential people, too.
So, what do you think?
pumpkinperson said:
Good question. I need to think about it & then I’ll respond in an imminent article.
Ray Penver said:
Perfect!
banned by peepee said:
peepee’s mental illness is sad.
pumpkinperson said:
We’re both mentally ill. The difference is I have the self-awareness to realize it.
LOADED said:
Aesthetic value in our lives is what we search for the most, almost like a meaning to life. That is why the autistic mind exists. It is a pure machine trying to find aesthetics in everything when there are things that are not of a consistent quality. For everything to be perfect, all things have to have consistent quality. If there is an inconsistency that exists in the Universe, we fail to really rationalize and come up with any value for it. That is why we have heuristics. To manage our aesthetic principles. But some things lack comprehension and/or sufficient quality. Things like the Law of Attraction refers to building up things that are perfect in everyone’s worldview. It has to fit a puzzle. All thought and action, basically all perceptions, are independent. Therefore, we can conclude that the puzzle pieces must add up to make a whole. If anything lacks consistency and does not add up, it will be prevented from existing in our Universe because no such thing would have meaning and purpose. If it were to exist, it would exist almost as a contradictory force or a force that cannot be comprehended, almost like dark matter. I’m no physicist, but I can guarantee you that all entities that should not exist are incomprehensible to the mind and the objective forces that sustain us. That’s why emotions aren’t necessarily linked to comprehensible forces in this world because they exist as almost ethereal forces that are a blend of different, immeasurable things. Emotions are almost a great analogy for quantum physics. Things that exist without comprehensibility, sometimes contradicting themselves and sometimes existing as immeasurable forces that have no individual significance whatsoever.
LOADED said:
Like I said, I think everyone is unconsciously aware of everything that exists, but consciously, they lack the ability to actualize it. It’s as if they can’t detect the visual patterns of what’s going to happen. They already are aware of the underlying emotion behind it, but it’s not visually available to us just yet.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
People is guided by their personality traits, cognition is guided by ”personality”/individuality in the moral judgments. People with higher openness will be considerably more favorable to diversity even for preference for the unusual and people with higher agreeableness will highly favorable to politeness.
LOADED said:
Learning ie the most humbling experience a person can go through. Theres a great quote by Robert J Frost that sums it up well. Its an admission of a lack of knowledge. Its vulnerability. Criticism is therefore a struggle between the Ego and life itself. Truly beautiful.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
Pervertson Jr, is you*
I bet you’re [ANOTHER] white trash stupid who think is rational, isn’t*
The Philosopher said:
This dating show can’t stop showing 1 gay couple per episode. SO bad. Why can’t they do a separate dating show for gays and trannies and ladyboys and all those werid things and let normal people enjoy their dating show.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
Normal people, so you could not participate of party because your stupidity, celibacy and schizophreny.
Normal people = masses… yes, these insects are these you worship.
Unfortunately, capitalism is for people to consume garbage culture and enrich of minority of son of bitchies.
The Philosopher said:
Maybe theyll start showing animals dating. Can’t wait to see a chicken on a date with a raccoon. This is the type of logic these people are using.
The Philosopher said:
Maybe theyll start showing people on dates with children. That is where this agenda is going.
The Philosopher said:
Its amazing how liberals ruin everything. I bet if you watched this show in Israel it would involve 100% hetero couples and no animals.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
Israel, even i hate this country, as i hate any other, by different specific reasons [and by unitary underllying reason: unponderacy], is only one which have many progressive agendas… if you try to think hard and anallyse things better, you would know about it.
SammyKid said:
The role models we have are very important. They influence of our role models is the most important thing that takes place in our Universe. If people have any inflience over you, you automatically lose. Thats how the game of life works. My belief is that we are blank slatists, bit during early childhood and onwards into our teen years, we look for peoples qualities to inherit.
Loaded said:
Thisvis how cult leaders pass on their legacy. This would describe how Biblical prophets create a name for themselves. Being naned after someone ages before youre even born leaves a legacy for sure.
LOADED said:
Shit tests are highly indicative of this. People shit test each other literally all the time, and thats how communication is brought forward.
LOADED said:
Such an old-timeky practice, naming shit after people.
LOADED said:
We should have computer geberated nanes, though I think thatd look prole in nature.
LOADED said:
I think we all idealize some types of lives over others, and seek to emulate these types of lives. I don’t blame PP if he idealizes billionaires. They lives the best lives. They are the creme de la creme so I won’t every blame him for trying to reach that.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
They are the creme de la creme of ilusion castle of mundane humanity.
LOADED IS RIGHT said:
That’s exactly what everyone should believe in. I think that society needs people who strive to be the most successful in life. Narcissism is such an essential social trait to dominate. LOOK AT MY BANK ACCOUNT! LOOK AT THE CASH AMOUNT!
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
Exactly, we need parasitic people who don’t care about the consequences of their acts in the powder…
LOADED said:
I personally believe music is the most inspirational thing ever. I think that when people create something then observe and contemplate it, they receive the purest joy in the world. I think it obviously depends on the thing, but anything novel in this Universe created by a human is the most beautiful thing a person can do.
LOADED said:
I, like Christopher Langan, fully believe in the Law of Attraction. I think that we all have wants and needs that contradict each other, so some form of psychic power manipulates who has power and a say and who doesn’t. Especially when it comes to deciphering the motives and wants and the needs of everyone. They all exist. But there scattered around due to contradicting wants and needs.
LOADED said:
I come off as heavily pretentious online and irl, so don’t mind me, I’m just trying to fit in.
spontaneous human detonation said:
in the following vid at ca 40m, chomsky says EXACTLY what i said about heller. he says all the opinions were wrong, that the correct and original intent argument would side with dc, and the correct and original intent argument must conclude that the 2d amendment is simply 100% irrelevant today.
so suck it swank.
if i were a black woman i would think chomsky is reading my comments. said:
the precise cue point is 43:30 give or take a second.
Bruno said:
I love Chomsky but his argument is completely contradictory.
So the culture of gun was invented for gun makers not to get broken after civil war and didn’t exist before (cowboys were poor animal pushers that almost didn’t use guns!). And at the same time, the two reasons for 2nd amendment were 1) being able to form a militia to fight against British and 2) for people to attack Indians (occupying « vacant » territory) and to handle slaves in mainland and Caribbeans.
So Chomsky argument is completely contradictory :
1) the reasons he found in the constitution foster by themselves a gun culture
2) the first reason seems to provide a right for militia and the second for individuals (so it wouldn’t be either or (guns only if there is a militia formed by gvt, but it would be both : right to gun and right to forming militia)
And if the constituants wanted people to have gun to fight external or internal ennemies, this right prevails even if there is no foreign danger and if black weren’t dangerous n’y more ….
LOADED said:
Pumpkin, post that Isaac Newton article now.
Rahul said:
Pumpkin, why are RPM norms so different based on age, while the Matrix Reasoning scores are similar based on age? Are there some other factors in the RPM that aren’t there in WAIS matrix reasoning?
Billy said:
RPM tries to give you an IQ score while matrix reasoning is just matrix reasoning. I’m guessing the standards would be different for norming.
pumpkinperson said:
There are several versions of the WAIS & different countries have different norms so you need to be more specific
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
PP,
Do you find Oprah hot**
Do you would do sex with her*
pumpkinperson said:
Haha, my interest in her is scientific not sexual.
The Philosopher said:
I hope the blacks win every oscar this year and finally get the recognition they deserve as more than just diversity sops meant to appease certain danish demographics.
pumpkinperson said:
hollywood’s supposed to reflect the american experience. america’s 14% black. unless you think blacks are bad actors (which would contradict your view that they’re more socially intelligent), we should expect them to win 14% of the oscars in a free market.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
I hope mexican movie win, i watched it, very good Cuáron… specially certain scene…
The Philosopher said:
Has anyone ever thought of changing their race to get into harvard? I saw Elizabeth Warren tried that. I found that very amusing. As we all know race is a social construction so I don’t understand why more people aren’t trying it.
Actually many gentiles could pass for jews. ‘Identifying’ (even converting) to judaism must immediately increase your life chances at higher income, higher ed, and being a hollywood actor 4 or 5 fold.
there's all buttington's disease...rare outside minas gerais. said:
i once axed my uni swank department if i’d qualify as an hispanic. no! because some of my ancestors were actual spaniards.
The Philosopher said:
I didn’t take my anti-psychotic medications today because i didn’t want to spend most of my day sleeping but now I have a really annoying obsessional thought that won’t go away. I can understand now why people become alcoholics or drug addicts just to get rid of this.
Even if Im watching a movie or reading something Ill have a feeling that something is wrong and Ill need to ‘scratch the itch’ and that usually makes it much worse.
Bruno said:
Philo, how does this thought present itself ? Image ? Voice ? Sounds ? Feeling ? Abstract meaning ? As my internal mental state is completely void of any noise, I am very interested by people describing their mental environnement, ordinary or not.
LOADED said:
I assume that under the influence of drugs and alcohol, we become more easily conditioned by things. If you’re intoxicated, you’ll assume that everything you’re doing in that moment that was right to you will be right to you, but when things are going poorly for you, you assume all things of that nature are poor to you. Very illogically stated, but if you can decipher what I’m saying, I’d really be impressed.
Bruno said:
My question Loaded is not about feeling or moral judgment, nor IQ, but’strictly’about mental ontology : I’d like to know the kind of objects that one can encounter in most people mind .
Bruno said:
You would only need to tell about your grandma feeing Nazi germany or Russian progroms without claiming being Jewish. That statement is unverifiable by a University if you do only a little bit of research. Jewish being half of whites, you re multiplying your chances by 35 if all was equal. But it’s not, because Jewish have more legacy status and higher scores. So I would say it’s reasonable to think that you multiply by 3 your chances by claiming to have a fleeeing bubbe
nemonous said:
I wonder if you have seen this video before PP. I never knew someone had outright asked Bill Gates what his IQ was, and he actually had a sort of answer.
nemonous said:
Of course I should have search the blog before rushing to post something I found.
LOADED said:
You can tell he’s not an autist by his facial expressions. Look at the way his eyes shift to the left when he thinks. He’s very conscious about everything he says, always thinking about what he’s doing and what he’s saying. Brilliant psychopath, I bet.
pumpkinperson said:
Though his non-verbal social IQ seems very low. His hands are flying all over the place. Horrible body language, especially compared to Oprah who has the best body language I’ve ever seen.
LOADED said:
I think Michelle Obama should endorse her. Michelle Obama at VP and Oprah as el Presidente.
If Michelle Obama was VP and Oprah was President, I think we’d probably be living in a simulation. I think people have specific talents and that’s the only thing they’re good at. Fuck all that “g factor” bullshit where every talent correlates with another talent or trait. I think people can have flaws in their cognitive ability, tilt one side or another. I wouldn’t want to see a talk show host or a businessperson or anything like that a President.
LOADED said:
I think that only politicians or lawyers should become President. That’s been their whole job their entire lives and they probably have a better grasp on anything politically-related than even the most brilliant people. No philosopher-king bullshit. A philosopher is a philosopher and should keep his day-time job as such. No need to lead a country. Maybe advise the rulers or have some form of influence, but working two jobs is heinous.
RaceRealist said:
“I think Michelle Obama should endorse her. Michelle Obama at VP and Oprah as el Presidente.”
Whatever you’re smoking, pass it over here.
LOADED said:
Ayyy! RR with the W! You know I’ll definitely pass over that blunt I’m smoking right now!
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
”I think that only politicians or lawyers should become President. ”
Loaded is so autist, i thought he take the trophy of master-of-autism from HelloKitty…
Marchiafava–Bignami disease...aka southern italian syndrome said:
no non black non homosexual person does not find oprah REPULSIVE.
pumpkinperson said:
That statement shows low social IQ. Oprah built her empire by appealing to suburban white heterosexual women: the crown jewl of the white race & the group most coveted by advertisers & politicians.
pumpkinperson said:
Oprah used to brag that she had the best looking audience on TV. I had a friend in high school who would only agree to watch Oprah because he found the women in the audience so good looking. Of course they probably seat the best looking in the front row,
RaceRealist said:
“Ayyy! RR with the W! You know I’ll definitely pass over that blunt I’m smoking right now!”
Make that a joint and you got a deal, buddy.
LOADED said:
Santo, only a bold take would face such criticism. You even had me fooled for a second believing it.
Billy said:
Pumpkin, sir, maybe Oprah’s verbal IQ is 140, but she is certainly within the area of 125. I can’t see her breaking 130.
pumpkinperson said:
The average self-made billionaire is 130 & oprah’s likely well above that average because she’s the biggest brained & most influential self-made billionaire.
LOADED said:
Hell yeah, RR, rollin’ up doobies, playin’ some groovy 60s music. “AND HERE’S TO YOU, MRS. ROBINSON, JESUS LOVES YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL KNOW! WOAH WOAH WOAH!”
RaceRealist said:
I don’t listen to music when I partake – I read books. Just bought Biological Individuality: Integrating Biological, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives. Good stuff.
https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo26049219.html
LOADED said:
I bet he’s not even aware that he’s a psychopath. He’s definitely not a sociopath. I characterize sociopaths as deriving pleasure from mental stimulation and cognitive sadism, in a sense. Psychopaths are lot more status-striving, aggressive and always looking for power.
Even though I think sociopathy requires more intense brain activity, I think it turns into an obsession where people are very fixated on one task. Psychopathy is a little more restrained and can be taught. So I don’t particularly know.
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
”I bet he’s not even aware that he’s a psychopath.”
What i’m saying…
All psychopaths know who they are and they are proud about it..
Bruno said:
Toothy predatory grin while speaking charity ….
Rahul said:
I was talking about WAIS IV in America, and RPM standardized in Des Moines, Iowa. The average IQ Des Moines is probably 3 points higher in IQ than the average IQ of America.
pumpkinperson said:
How do you know what the WAIS-IV or RPM norms are and what specific differences are you seeing?
Rahul said:
Well, there was a pdf with the Ravens norms, and there’s also another paper which analyzed wais Iv average subtest scores per age.
it's sad how peepee has proved why her people should be hated. said:
nippo-brownzilians fought in this battle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Buttington.
pumpkinperson said:
I agree my people should be hated. I hate them myself.
blargho said:
Hey Pumpkin, what do you estimate this guy’s brain size to be? Looks huge but he was arrested for sick sex crimes….
https://tinyurl.com/y2azfc7y
OPRAH-ME [THE TRUE PHILOSOPHER] ESSENTIAL AESTHETICS PREVAIL's said:
Oprah has a higher size…
pumpkinperson said:
It’s certainly very big relative to his face, but his face could be unusually small. He’s very anatomically modern looking, in that what distinguishes our species from archaics is the highness of our crania and the protrusion of the braincase in front of the face. Perhaps whatever freak mutation or prenatal accident caused his sexual deviance also affected his brain shape.
Pingback: Strength and Neuromuscular Coordination « NotPoliticallyCorrect