Blogger n/a analyzed the ethnic background of Forbes 2013 listing’ of “The World’s Billionaires“:
| No. | % | |
| Northwestern European | 415 | 29.10 |
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 313 | 21.95 |
| Jewish | 249 | 17.46 |
| Middle Eastern or Central Asian | 120 | 8.42 |
| Eastern European | 95 | 6.66 |
| Southern European | 84 | 5.89 |
| (New World) Hispanic or Brazilian | 75 | 5.26 |
| South Asian | 69 | 4.84 |
| Black | 6 | 0.42 |
| total | 1426 | 100 |
So even though blacks are 15% of the World’s population, they are only 0.42% of the World’s richest. Thus their representation among the super rich is only 2.8% of their population share.
White (Gentiles) are 16% of the World’s population, but 41.65% of the World’s billionaires, thus their representation among the super rich is 260% of their population share.
Jews are only 0.2% of the World’s population, but 17.46% of the World’s richest. Thus their representation is 8,730% of their population share.
Pumpkin Person 
Jews and Middle Easterners comprise the same race with Europeans making the Caucasian race; you’re just talking about subraces of the Caucasian race.
True. I’m surprised Asian and Pacific Islander is considered one category while European is broken up geographically.
And if you want to make Jewish score even more apparent, you take ashkenazi Jewish 1.4% for around 16% (out of 18%).
Then you take the % of money owned by billionnaires. You would probably go around 28%.
So then you have a factor 200 (instead of 90). White would have a factor 2. So ashkenazi do 100 times better than non ashkenazim whites
I normally use Ashkenazi Jews instead of Jews, but since n/a did not make that distinction when analyzing the ethnic origin of worldwide billionaires, I didn’t either.
You re 0.2% must have included all Jews because there are 10/11 M Ashkenazim, 2/3 M sefardim and 3 M Midrashim. Probably 15M in total is 0.2% of ww.
But ashkenazim concentrate Nobel prizes and money. The rest of Jewish are the same as non Jewish white people.
In France we have 65% Sephardim, 30% ashkenazim and 5% mizrahim.
In the USA, they have 90% ashkenazim and 5% mizrahim and 5% Sephardim.
It’s like Indian in Europe and the USA, not the same. You got the european. We got the african(ized) .
If we assume that 100% of Jewish billionaires are Ashkenazi Jews, then Ashkenazi Jews are 17.46% of the World’s billionaires despite being 0.14% of the World, so they are represented at 12,741% of their population share, compared to whites who are represented at 260% and blacks who are represented at 2.8%.
I wouldn’t go that far. As of 2013, non-Jewish whites had 594 billionaires and Jews had 249. If we assume all those Jews were Ashkenazi and if you consider Ashkenazi a type of white, then 249 out of 843 white billionaires were Jewish. Assuming equal net-worth of Jewish and non-Jewish billionaires, then Jews have around 30% of white wealth. But their percentage would be much higher if you limited the analysis to just the United States, which is where it matters most.
Yes.
I checked for greatest scientific prizes.
Ashkenazim are over-represented 30 times compare to non Jewish whites. Sephardim and mizrahim are over-represented 6 times. But if you discount the cases when the mother was ashkenazim (lots of social workers in the 20 and 30 used to go to Italy and Greece and Middle East) wich is 2 cases out of 3, then they are over-represented by a factor 2. So it looks like even in science, other Jewish are above white people in terms of recognition.
And before the XIX century, all wealth and all philosophy and science was non ashkenazim. So the study of Jewish temperament, IQ and success should focus on those theee categories to better understand where does the avantage comes from ….
Within the U.S., Jews are far more more over-represented among U.S. Nobel Prizes in economics than they are in chemistry, literature, or peace.
https://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/jewish-nobel-prize-winners/
It makes sense that they would be better in economics than chemistry because the former requires math and verbal IQ where they do best, while the latter has a spatial component where they do much worse.
It’s surprising that they don’t do better in literature, but perhaps the great American novel is drawn from all aspects of American life, and Jews living mostly on the coasts, struggle to tell stories about the heartland. Or maybe their top writing talent is too busy writing movies and TV shows and literature is more subjective.
The lack of peace prizes may be because they’re too worried about Israel’s security to seek peaceful agreements like Carter did in the Middle East, or maybe because it’s less related to IQ, or maybe it’s just a joke, since Obama won it merely for being a black president.
So coming back to billionnaires, the educated guess is’that Ashkenazim have half of the white money. It means they are 100 times over-represented. When you imagine how much influence billionnaires have in shaping society in western countries, it makes thesis like philosopher one look far less exotic !
Interestingly, it’s the same for littérature and classical music composition in France .
If you take the best 200 writers, they are not more than 10 Jewish among them. That’s my first t’en French author.
1- Racine
2- Proust (Jewish)
3- Baudelaire
4- Balzac
5- Pascal
6- Rousseau
7 – Stendhal
8- Valéry
9- Flaubert
10 – Zola
Interesting. Perhaps great novels can not easily be monopolized by one group cause what makes them great is the diversity of voices & experiences they capture.
It’s intersting that literature is one of the few areas blacks have won the Nobel Prize. Some might say the subjective nature of literature makes it easier for judges to be politically correct, but i suspect it’s more than that
Its becaude whites hae empathy and jews do not. Try writi g a novel as a psychopah. Its very hard.
I wonder what pumpkin thinks of my theory that fiat money ensures a fe facto ariatocracy? Let me sell it out puppy wr all live on a monopoly game board but some people are the banker.
If you understand this then youd realise many third world doctators are ‘richer’ than anyone in the private sector.
With the exception of the jews running the us treasury.
If you understand this then youd realise many third world doctators are ‘richer’ than anyone in the private sector.
No, Robert Mugabe tried this in Zimbabwe and the result was hyperinflation and devaluing of his currency.
Robert Mugabe is richer than Bill Gates. All he has to do is throw make belief paper at any zimbabwean and he can do whatever he wants them to do. ‘Richer’ doesnt mean anything. Its what you can get other people to do at the end of the day. Thats why we have money.
He already tried that pill. It backfired spectacularly:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe
You’re more out of touch with reality than the “autistic” economists you attack.
State the currency they use in Zimbabwe right now Puppy.
Case closed.
Use of the Zimbabwean dollar as an official currency was effectively abandoned on 12 April 2009. It was demonetised in 2015, with outstanding accounts able to be reimbursed until April 30, 2016.[5][6] In place of the Zimbabwean dollar, currencies including the South African rand, Botswana pula, pound sterling, Indian rupee, euro, Japanese yen, Australian dollar, Chinese yuan, and the United States dollar are now regularly used
Case closed
But you keep denying HBD & thinking your magic negro Mugabe is more successful than bill gates
You’ve been brainwashed well
What does it mean to deny HBD?
Is HBD denial denying a genetic component to IQ? Or is it denying that racial differences in behavior have a genetic basis? Denying the MAOA or testosterone causes for crime? Please define “HBD denial”, because it is a vague phrase.
Central banks print fake money to
(A) tell people what to do and they do it whe they see the magic paper
(B) regulate interest rates…i.e the price of magic money
(C) dole out free ious to a certain cadre of people
A and b are unquestionable. Even friedman would admit those. But c is the one im trying to figure out..
When stali called tge first russian cebtral bank governor a bureacracrat maybe he literally meant that. That politicans tell the. What to do and not a landed elite.
Just replace land with the magic keyboard access to the cb
Its the sae thing. More complicated. More boring looking.
This is all assuming mankiw was telling lies in his textbook and banks print money from thin air
If mankiw is wrong, logically people that control magic money printing control the country.
If you believe mugabe you have this scenaro. Serfs are allowd to win their freedom in ‘capitalist’ systems. Unlike feudal societies. Thats the only difference.
In feudal socieites serfs cannot become barons no matter how much they scam and hustle.
What seems to have happened in the west is that jews actually managed to ruse above serfdom and ‘antisemitism’ to become the plantation owners.
Swanky who is an idiot, is right that viq (and marchant brain) was the evolutionary revolution to instigate this.
Most very rich people have ‘merchant brain’ ie psychopathy even if they are nominally politicans or royalty ot army generals etc.
Modern socieites select for ‘merchant brain’. This is either a boon or a blunder to the acerage perso depending on what ideologies you believe.
Adam smith said merchants male veryone rich. I dont think hes wrong….as long as everyone taxes or confiscates wealth from the merchant
♤♤
Make belief conservativrs like george will would ratger set themselves in fire abd publicly self castrate themselves than admit confiscation from our premier merchants is economically the logical choice.
This is simply because metchants tend to hoard magic ious rather than bombing them on people to run around and do stuff.
And so we come to the philosphers ultimatum:
1. All socieites tebd towards feudalism for whatever reason.
2. The best designed governments make sure the aristocracy is less steve schwarzmann and more elon musk.
3. Knowing that the overall tebdency is towards schwarzmann types.
In the last 5 posts ive explained how the conomy works more than 2000 pages of economic textbools and academic journals. But this hinges on banks really being this communist resource allocation hose.
Natural law iis the house view on what should be.
Its what the creator defaults to. I have no idea of the intention or evenif its an ‘intention’ in a human cognitive sense.
All i know is that these are the house rules. For whatever reason. I gave up a long time ago trying to moralise it ir understand it. Its very weird and bizzare. Alnost anti civilisation.
Ithe person that most cloesly said what the creator think is cona the barbarian.
This isnt a joke.
Human beings throw up a lot more genhis khans than king davids.
I dont even know if king david really existed.
The sadbess of philosophy is knowing that it cant be true no matter how much you wanted it to be. People dont recover from true enlightenment. Im not talking about reading jim jo es lectures in the hiffington post. True reality is hard to accept. This is the sadness of real non autistc philosophy.
Human beings werebt mean to see reality. This is why religion is so popular. Or sjwism or liberatarianism etc. Reality is a lot more like detroit than disneyland. The biggest irony is that the only people that can make detroit not dianeyland have to be substantially brainwadhed themseves.
This is why most white socities are founded in religion and not science.
I.m on the train looking at these two asian kids playing pokemon cards. Im jealous im not as ignornt as them. I was very happy in amke belief land as a child. Very happy.
Philosophy is ubderstanding children are happier than philosophers.
But terry tao and bill gates are just as happy.
Depression is not good.
Pingback: Who’s a Racist/Sexist/Homephobe? (Part 1 of 2) | Lela E. Buis
China created 257 billionaires in august 1 month alone. Your data is so out of doubt china has 898 billionaires. DUMB
kant defined “a priori” and believed synthetic a priori judgements were possible. melo doesn’t know this because he knows nothing about philosophy. sad.