I did a google search for photos of different generations posing left to right from oldest to youngest, for the same picture and I was impressed by how perfectly Microsoft’s How Old Do I Look app was able to rank them (yellow age squares were added by app):
Guessing age is one of those intuitive tasks that were once thought to be beyond the capacity of computers, but with the advent of machine learning, artificial intelligence is progressing rapidly.
Pumpkin Person 
I remember back in the day Pumpkin was posting about how men today evolved to pursue status and power because historicaly its been the best route to reproductive success and that men are not actively purseing sperm donation thru artificial insemination. Well im here to tell you Pumpkin, your dead wrong motherfucker! after all these years of trying to reproduce naturaly AND artificialy I’m finnaly on track to do the latter with this gay female couple. They chose me as to be their donor for obvious reasons AND because a lesbian friend of mine reffered me. were setting up the schedules now to meet up and nut in soft cup (this stuff is done over the internet ofc) hopefuly soon ill be a succsses in natural AND artfificial selection
Way to go Mikey!
Perhaps the ultimate measure of genetic superiority is how much one’s sperm would sell for on eBay
That……fuck. Might actually be true. Think if Justin Bieber sold his sperm on ebay. You dont think it would be worth millions? Supply and demand motherfucker.
I mean think about it. If your sperm was on a public market how valuable would it be? Pumpkin i know that was a funny joke but your on to something here!
I Mean were all guys here and were measuring genetic fitness by what? Intelligence, finances, popularity in the world, but arent we biased? we are. We dont decide who is geneticaly fit, females do! But not once does it ever occur to us that maybe just maybe science, riches and political power are just nerdy things we men like to do in our spare time because were not getting laid? You dont see a bunch of hyper intelligent women getting together and discussing who is geneticaly superior and whos not because theyre out getting laid right now as we speak, and if they’re not they could if they wanted to at any time. But here we are discussing scientific theory and comparing our brain sizes, because lets face it we CANT get laid any time we want. Instead we shouldnt be so got damn biased in our measurements. IQ measures intelligence. NOT genetic superiority. Female choice Measures genetic superiority! There i said it crucify me if you want but its not my genes being thrown under the buss here.
My sperm would be overvalued because I’m a celeb. People would pay big bucks just for all the status that comes with being the mother of pumpkin’s baby. But for non-famous people, highly valued sperm means you have the genetic traits parents are looking for in an offspring and that’s a good measure of genetic superiority.
Even your name is in third person. I wouldnt be surprised if your real life persona is completely different from this online one and your actually some well known actor.
“highly valued sperm means you have the genetic traits parents are looking for.” what are you man allergic to gender? replace the word parents with women and all of the sudden that statement makes sense.
peepee thinks the american elite aren’t stupid. this should change her mind.
today the supreme court of washington state upheld the conviction of a 17 year old for dissemination of child pornography. what exactly did this 17 year old do? he took a picture of his junk and sent it to one other person.
No doubt there are many stupid people in American (((elites but they tend to be evil, a different type of stupid.
The more I think about this the more the pieces start to fit together. There seems to be some sort of ‘battle of the sexes’, that drives human evolution towards a higher intelligence. Here me out on this one. It seems a sort of reverse sexual selection has happened in humans in that women are not at all attracted to male intelligence but nonetheless hi IQ men have managed to impregnate them anyway time and time again and so humans incurred what i call a ‘reverse runaway sexual selection’. It seems that males WERE OUT SMARTING FEMALE CHOICE! EUREKA! thats whats been driving our higher intelligence! Dont you see? Its not that women are attracted to intelligence, its that men use intelligence in the same way bulls use horns! In the past Pumpkin has argued that historicaly IQ allowed us to outsmart other males. Im arguing historicaly IQ allowed us to outsmart FEmales! In the past Pumpkin argued that in modern day. Intelligence no longer enhances reproductive success. Well Pumpkin your flat out wrong! Modern day sperm donors are popping out babies at the rate of ancient kings. Look at the list of the most prolific fathers in history if you dont believe me. you’l see the names of sperm donors right next to royalty.
Historically the main reason smart men passed on the most genes is they were probably the ones who were able to keep themselves and their families alive. Dumb guys probably got more sex and still do, and now that survival is no longer a factor, the genetically unfit are the most genetically fit.
Then how do you explain the huge reproductive success of sperm donors, who have overwhelmingly hi IQ”s
I’ve noticed that the older the men get, the dumber (& younger) he wants his partner to be. And the older a woman gets, the least willing she is to get a dumber partner.
As consequence, the more liberal a society gets – people having baby later in life with first, second, nth partner – the lesser the probabilty to transmit high IQ genes : because the high IQ men will mixed their genes with lesser intelligent wife and high IQ women won’t reproduce. For the sociely as a all, it may be minor (like loosing 1 IQ point on average each 30 years, but that’s compensated by nutrition).
But I’m pretty sure that for the very high IQ genes (>150), this dysgenic effect of late mariage, given male & women symetric preferences, is huge.
Mikeys theory makes sense. Very good.
Thank you. and bruno what your saying is true. since hi IQ women arent reproducing but hi IQ men are. It simply means that the avg intelligence of women will stay the same but over time the avg intelligence of men will skyrocket. Of course this change takes hundreds of years to happen atleast AND assuming our modern environment stays the same. Theres already a small but significant gap between mens and womens intelligence and its only going to get wider.
A kind of genetic canalisation*
Maybe you are analysing the effect of current dysgenic trends that is very strong for higher IQ women but not for men and giving for this a type of intentionality, ”higher IQ men are doing this in intentional way”, and i think don’t seems to be like that. But bear in mind that seems ”female intelligence genes” are also very important, any big imbalance might be unhealthy if i really understand what you said.
Maybe this dysgenic trends is greater for higher verbal IQ men than for higher quantitative IQ or non-verbal.
You do realize there is a sperm donor with 30 plus kids who is also a virgin? Google him. Thats a pretty convincing argument for hi IQ donors doing this on purpose. also maybe high verbal IQ men are trending greater. Hopefully we can trust Pumpkin to crunch the numbers and give hardcore data in his next post.
Families without a ‘dynasty’ or strong tribal unit regulating genetics and marriage are human livestock for the cattle ranch that is civilization.
well said fenoopy.
mass media in the “free world” is just as effective as it is in the dprk. the US is the last redoubt of free speech and alternatives to msm. this is the only thing the US has going for it.
it does appear that the whole world is headed toward permanent enslavement by an unelected global elite. it maintains its power by simulating democracy and never ending propaganda. a solution is breaking up the mass media oligopoly, proportional representation, campaign finance restrictions, make it illegal for any mass media companies to be owned by foreigners.
i wonder if canadians know that their minds are controlled by the (gentile) thomson family.
also explain how dumb guys could have more sex if they dont live for very long. You have forgotten that we males have no menopause and we remain fertile thru out our entire lives. Therefore by your own logic HI IQ men would have more sex because they’re living longer yet you state otherwise. Get your shit together man.
Culture of Critique is a very good book. I didn’t know the NAACP was funded by jews and had a jewish president up until 1975. Or that their whole legal department was only jews for decades.
And of course Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg funded the NAACP.
When I said civil rights was a trojan horse, I didn’t even think it literally was a front operation like this.
Hahahah. Hilary on video saying shes staying in the 2008 race with Obama implying she was hoping [redacted by pp, Sept 15, 2017]
Hahahahah. I havent laughed that much in a long time.
It almost seemed like she was trying to incite someone
Incredible footage.
Well I always mention Hillary as a textbook example of a pyschopath. The secret service bodyguards to Bill hated her. One of them wrote a tell all book about Hillary.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/06/secret-service-agents-book-claims-clinton-has-volcanic-leadership-style.html
Read these other anecdotes from other secret service the journalist interviewed.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424927/hillary-clinton-bane-secret-service-deroy-murdock
She is Grade A toxic.
The election is over, no need to keep on talking about her. Make your comments topic related
^Aspy
I understand your feelings, =(
http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/on-schizophrenia/
This was a very good article on Unz today. Theres an excerpt from his son at the end talking about his onset.
I don’t have this type of schiz, but I’ve met people that have.
I sometimes think schiz is like you are dreaming and everything is fluid and suggestive. Ive had dreams when I was younger like this guy’s onset. I think many people have schiz episodes like this type because the ‘barrier’ that seperates the sub conconcious from concious is loose like in ‘sleep paralysis’ episodes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_paralysis
There was an interesting conversaton I had with a former co worker once and I told him about A-S theory and he made a great point that people take drugs to feel like they have a certain type of schizophrenia. And then I made the corollary that if that is true, people who are already prone to schiz will go fully psychotic and not come back from a trip.
I’ve taken coke before and it has no effect on me beyond grinding my teeth. This is because when someone people take coke they go paranoid, whereas I already have this crappy brain chemistry.
But when I take alcohol I feel normal again pre onset. And I think about my obsessions and they dont feel important or as threatening anymore. I am just like I was 7 years ago.
phil r u on meds my friend became. schitz a few years ago
My brother is a visual thinker.
I struggle to try to think up anything at all.
I told myself I was good at open-ended problem-solving.
I am more abstract that way.
When I think of all the time I have wasted because of immaturity I feel said.
I see invisible things in my mind.
I have no problems rotating items on tests.
But I see nothing
Mediation seems to be helping out with my emotions.
I rarely feel my own heartbeat.
It feels incredible.
Are You A Visual Thinker?
”I see invisible things in my mind.”
”I have no problems rotating items on tests.”
I prefer rotate tests than items, easier, 😉
Having absolutely no image access and no memory recall at all, there is a mental experience that Budhsit struggles all their life to achieve without success – Wunien and Zen – that I can instantly reach.
This state of mind consist of pure thoughtlessness, or living in the present. I just stop my internal voice and then I don’t have any conscious mental process at all. it’s just the consequence of having a mental process that can only pass through vocalizing and where there are neither images, sounds nor recall in my mind.
Schizophrenics have a jungle. I have a desert. I believe it’s asperger like but to the extreme.
While a relative of a pathological liar/psychotic maternal uncle I also have a hyperactive default network. There is a study I read recently that found this feature among schizophrenics and relatives and it’s quite interesting and true at least for me. I’m always connected with my self world, via imagination. I literally created a parallel world with characters (mostly females) and even a country but differently than my mentally ill uncle I know that this world I created don’t exist and subsequently I don’t try to convince other people that this world is real. I know that when I’m too much connected with my default network I become more paranoid and when I off it I feel I’m interacting in first person with the exterior reality and I feel the necessity to on it again even I know it’s tend to be detrimental with my real life.
“This state of mind consist of pure thoughtlessness, or living in the present.”
I have had anxiety for 7 years now and have only recently been able to manage it. I do not need to stop anything I just need to let go of my need to metalize anything. Or control my thoughts. Anxiety made me feel I needed to be constantly active. It is my emotions that determine if I have zen or not.
If i’m not interacting with anyone or anything, I don’t have emotions. Emotions never pop up in my mind without an external imput. I believe it’s because of not having episodic memory (or recall). I’m not equipped to understand the mind of someone bothered emotions, either on the schizo side or in the autistic side, I believe.
Good that Pumpkin’s blog attracts lots of non neuro-typic people, one of the cool nerdy-slumish-freakish’s ark.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/908851137524015104?p=v
Stupidity on the right. When “left wing/jacobin” is right.
Maybe I’m off wing.
Industrial revolution has been disastrous for
Environment
Working classes
Specially in ita first two centuries but still today.
People who work hard and too much and receive very little foe that.
On other hand we have people who work less and soft and receive at least the triple of those who work hard.
I’m not advocating to put working class above elites because while a hierarchical model human societies inevitably will need a differentiated group of people who manage and direct it. The problem is not have a elite, it’s this elite be evil and stupid and that’s exactly what we have, the worst possible scenario.
Seems for right wing people XVIII and XIX centuries don’t exist.
“To” manage and direct it.
peepee should watch the 5 part charlie rose bannon interview on charlierose.com.
the individualist ideology serves globalism and multiculturalism.
bannon has yet to reach level 5. he doesn’t realize that people and ideas are interchangeable.
one of the tenets of the individualist ideology is that the characteristics of a society are merely the characteristics of its individual members, is that the whole is the sum of its parts.
the prev ailing ideology is false. those who promote it are motivated by greed.
another way of putting this is that the individualist ideology assumes (falsely) that society and culture don’t exist.
the prevailing ideology is as ridiculous as scientology.
there are two phenomena. the individualist ideology denies the second.
1. individual differences…which only exist in the context of a society.
2. societal differences. the characteristics of a society are an “emergent” phenomenon. they are not predictable from the characteristics of its individual members…which don’t exist.
without the individualist ideology (which is false) there is no globalization or european union.
the rich (and thus powerful) want cheap labor. their position is greed, but they justify their position as “there is no such thing as society. any who think otherwise are racists!”
it’s obvious if you think about it.
peepee says, “i only let mugabe post his alt-right nonsense, because i love his avatar.”
there’s a lot of nonsense on the alt-right, but my nonsense is not nonsense.
globalism and multi-culturalism/multi-racialism and democracy…you have to choose.
i choose democracy.
Spent nearly 2 hours on an epic game of age of empires 3. Ahhhh this is the life of a basement troll.
Hahaha.
So Ill watch this hypernormalisation to see what its about then. Why not.
Roberts doc on the paedo medical scientist was very good.
The century of Self is probably one of the cornerstone docs that influence how I see society. Good old (((Edward Bernays))) and his proto mind control advertising.
Bernays was Freud’s nephew. If you read culture of critique, MacDonald makes the case that Freud was purposely trying to sexualise and deregulate sexually western society as he wanted whites to have low investment parenting styles and atomised individuals. He thought strong families and parents led to anti-semitism and thats why he wanted permissive parents and liberal purple haired goons as kids.
…..He makes a more persuasive case Freud was operating a cult, as psycho analysis has no empirical research and is tautologically driven (“Why would you question our assumptions, you must have unresolved issues…”.).
As you all know I respect Freud’s work but not all of it. But some of it is very insightful. For example the notion of id (instinct), subconscious, and ego (conscious). I think that has held up.
Freud believed the unconscious was a cesspool where all the horrible things about ourselves flushed down into. This is why Carl Jung broke ties with him. Because Jung’s psychology involved both good and bad. It is believed that Freud was ISTJ. The functions of that type are basic animal instincts (Si) and induction (Te). There was no reason to sexually degrade society because the unconscious already held evil, vile, occult, animal desires. Freud told Jung to never bring it to the surface because it was too dangerous. Freud’s view was incomplete alinement with what Christians call a fallen nature. So Jung let go his ties with Freud. Freud’s unconscious was filled with such things as to view humanity as totally corrupted. But this did not follow from Jungs Deductive (Ti) methods of psychoanalysis.
Interesting.
First 2 minutes:
“Instead they constructed a simpler version of the world, in order to hang onto power”
If he doesn’t talk about how academia in the past 30 years has been stupefied to down syndrome level I’ll scream.
(FYI: Read a research paper from the 1950s or 60s and compare it today, its astonishing – either you assume IQ has dropped wholesale – which is what I think has happened – or you make an alternative but equally plausible case that the academic elite i.e. jews, select for retards to publish thrash as anyone getting near the truth about race, crime, economy, sex, gender, family, religion etc etc must be stopped at all costs!)
When I say there is a conspiracy, I mean exactly that. The academic elites purposely teach nonsense to stop the truth about national socialism ever and it utility ever coming through.
When you say the purpose of academia is to brainwash the masses, does that include Marxism, which is one of the most important ideas you learn in university?
You don’t learn marxism in university. I covered an entire undergrad in econ and learned scientology.
Nothing i learned (a) made sense (b) was empirically true.
In the social sciences you learn Marxism
So the question becomes why does academia teach Marxism? Are they so intelligent that they’re able to think for themselves, or does Marxism benefit the elite in some way? Perhaps Marxism is a divide and conquer way of getting whites to fight among themselves based on social class, thus weakening their racial cohesion?
Not economics anyway. I doubt you cover it in psych either, did you?
[redacted by pp, sept 16, 2017] marxism is the one idea no one learns at university. this proves peepee is a hs student. sad!
or peepee went to college in north korea?
I was an economics major who took philosophy, anthropology, literature and history courses in college. Marxism was only discussed briefly in a handful of these classes.
I always laugh at College Republicans who talk about “Marxist indoctrination” in the classroom.
I always ask: were you forced to take such classes? There’s plenty of business school classes where they completely reject Marx. Or if you want a rigorous college education, major in STEM, where Marx is irrelevant…
Pumpkin should blog about how knowing statistics doesn’t stop the entire academic community from saying there is no such thing as race.
Notice the way you can have any data or math or model in the world and you will still be a retard if you allow high verbal people to mind control you and ‘think’ certain topics are taboo or ‘evil’ in your mind.
“I am evil because I think blacks are bad” – this is something that is embedded in every white person who grew up watching tv in the 1990s onwards.
Try it. Say the word nigger out loud (not in your head).
Do you feel a negative emotion?
Why: Judaism.
Now try: Hitler was good.
Do you see the images in your head goyim? You think 60m other people didn’t think of the exact same of similar pictures when you said the word Hitler?
Hahahaha.
half an hour in and Curtis ‘explanations’ like Kissinger dividing up the middle east for ‘balance of power’ and not to protect Israel is very annoying.
Standard retard crap about how the USSR collapsed cos theyz twwy twy to contwoll everything !!! You Know. So Stupid. You know?
Hope he says something useful instead of ignoring why whites fled New York in the 70s.
So far this doc reminds how profoundly weird and bizarre peoples explanations of things have to be when you refuse to talk about tribes of man – blacks, jews in particular.
Its like explaining a football match by talking about another sport.
yes. but his point that politics has been supplanted by an unelected global elite is correct. he also correct that this will be harder to overthrow than past despotisms.
Modern explanations for world events:
“Today man city beat watford 6-0 by employing a mass butterfly stroke before switching to a breastroke at half time”
“In 2017 the murder crime rate rose 250% because police had the first serve in a thrilling 3 love set”.
“The real median wage of workers has stagnated since 1979 because politicans missed 2 conversion on the back of several tries.”
Just ridiculous.
more evidence that the american elite is stupid. will this change peepee’s mind?
Im going to stop bitching about the detail of this doc now as its painful and just watch it for the factoids on mid east history.
But a larger issue I’d like to raise whilst simultaneously boasting about how brilliant I am is the issue of listening to a lower ability person talking about how something works. VERY FUCKING ANNOYING.
I can tell this mans ability just by seeing how he interprets facts and the questions he asked.
A consistent problem some people have is the lack of instinct or intuition about ‘size or magnitude of a force’. I say this to mean something like:
(a) We lost the game because a player was sent off and gave away a penalty
(b) We lost the game because not enough fans paid for attendance and the player was sent of and gave away a penalty
(c) We lost the game because while we had a sending off and pen given against, we had enough players left to win and didn’t try hard enough.
You either ‘feel’ the right answer to the above, or you can’t intuitively ‘feel’ what is the best ‘weight’ on the arguments, knowing the context of the squad, manager, tactics, football history etc etc.
I genuinely think most people don’t have this sense of ‘weight’. For example Robert. Who keeps asking me for badge numbers, handwritten statements and membership lists to the Jewish World Domination Invitation Only Club.
The bizarre thing is I bet robert can ‘weigh’ physical items in his head abstractly, but when you ask him why a team lost, he’ll give you nonsense like ‘the players were thinking about their holidays too much while they were playing’.
I grew up in a house with no books except the bible. My father is ‘intellectually impaired’. My mother never even finished primary education. My sister dealt drugs in school. So if I can figure it out what the fuck is their excuse?!
Honestly, the vast majority of people Ive met in my life or seen on tv or read in blogs, books comment sections don’t have this.
So you get endless speculating, or lists of factors where everything is equally valid.
Its very annoying.
Some people have developed statistics to help them, which is fine. But most things in life you can’t collect surveys on or go to an NSA computer and read their thoughts. You have to ‘feel’ what was the deciding influence or how the influence melted into each other.
Every argument is essentially deciding what is the greater force.
yes pill. “aesthetics” don’t lie. and people lie to themselves when they convince themselves that aesthetics are meaningless. the bulk of the evidence favors HBD, but not all of it. and to go ahead with eugenics without knowing why it works or being sure that it will work is a bad decision.
I think this is down to the way people think. Minds focused upon the bigger picture will always understand weight. Minds that focus on details will often completely misunderstand weight and get lost in irrelevant details.
Maybe some people will argue that this is ‘higher creativity/schizo’ but I disagree. I think lack of ability to focus on the most important parts of a pattern is simply poor pattern spotting ability aka low IQ/stupidity. High IQ often leads to low creativity simply because in the process of always spotting the most important parts of a pattern the irrelevant parts are completely disregarded and not given any thought, closing off the potential thought patterns in those directions.
Higher IQ people with lack of higher creativity tend to have bigger semantic memories but surprisingly lower analytical skills if compared with ita Crystallized arsenal. It’s a type of unbalance between fluid/analytical-critical and crystalized/memory. They trust too much on what their memories internalize. And seems obvious too the psychological weaknesses as lack of self knowledge (intellectual independence, honesty and humility). They have bigger cognitive arsenal but their psychological sides are instinctive as of any other non human living being. They can’t control or evaluate precisely how their emotions judge. My opinion.
I think that is just lack of wisdom and higher IQ people that achieve wisdom must go through two pressures. The first, great misery, the second, access to readily available knowledge and experience.
There are this profile too but we are talking about lack of creativity among them firstly.
There is
pill is again misrepresenting “robert”‘s opinions.
he is also assuming that people say what they really think in public or in documentaries.
there are things one is not allowed to say or think.
people “adapt” to this by changing what they think. so they come up with elaborate and ridiculous explanations for the facts in order to avoid the obvious which they are not allowed to think. when it is adaptive to be blind, the blind are adaptive. this is the opposite of adaptation, and demonstrates how meaningless the word is as peepee uses it. in a criminal society like the US and UK, adapting to reality is bad for you. believing is falsehoods is adaptive.
1984 was not about stalinism. it was about britain.
this applies only to the livestock class.
The thing about law is that it is a game where you arent arguing size of the forces, but that certain arguments can ‘trip a wire’ and re-route the argument into a smaller arena or end the argument immediately.
The difference between philosophy and law, is that in philosophy there are no trip wires outside of pro forma logic, which seems to be innate.
This is why when a good philosopher and good lawyer debate a topic, the lawyer will revert to technicalities or trip wire gambits, rather than confronting the force of the argument. The harsh truth is that if you argue like a lawyer e.g. a certain previous french-haitian commenter, you have never actually thought about the FORCE of the underlying phenomenon. THE WHOLE TIME YOU THOUGHT ABOUT TRIP WIRES INSTEAD OF THINKING, WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON.
if it comes to pass that individual psychological traits can be predicted with the same algorithm for everyone, rank a sample from every population fairly accurately, directly from the genome then the trip wires don’t matter. the HBDers will have proved their case.
I disavow the KKK, the alt right, the white nationalists, Gerard Butler, Citizen Kane’s makeup artist and every single eskimo between the ages of 14 and 23 and a half.
pill is correct. academia selects for retarded people. a special kind of retarded people. but it’s not just academia. it’s the whole system. and it’s true of all systems to varying degrees. the rich and powerful want servants. they don’t want competitors.
and every institution is like the roman church. those who make it to the top are true believers and thus stupid, or sociopaths. there is no danger that the pope will be a secret muslim. get it? but 99% of people are sociopaths, in the sense that they are incapable of seeing human institutions as contingent and factitious. they see them as natural. that they could be very different from what they are is a thought they can’t think.
http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/marshall-steinbaum-why-are-economists-giving-piketty-cold-shoulder
i am incredibly garbage at math but have super-genius pattern spotting. either math is based upon memory/schooling, or my 83 point sub-human berber iq is letting me down
https://books.google.com.br/books?id=I2cWBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=karlsson+schizophrenia&source=bl&ots=-eMRSd_5eS&sig=1USR5yWhOWxDwNQiI46z4a_Ywuw&hl=pt-BR&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwju3K_Xr6zWAhVB2xoKHYlGB40Q6AEIajAN#v=onepage&q=karlsson%20schizophrenia&f=false
Interestingly in some studies psychotic historical families tend to have disproportionate rate of gifted people. Seems psychosis rates tend to be found in both upper and under classes.
Bear in mind that icelandic society and specially until the recent past may be a different society than for example USA and with relatively different selective pressures.
iceland is my idea of the perfect country. i wonder if they have more genetic problems because they have such a limited stock. but they’re not pure vikings. the vikings brought celtic slaves to iceland. i would guess they have fewer genetic issues than pakistanis in britain. pakis love to marry their cousins. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/591577/British-Pakistanis-13-times-more-disabled-children
heterosis, or hybrid vigor, seems to have steeply diminishing returns.