Lion of the Blogosphere writes:
The genetically high IQ of Koreans means that North Korea can produce nuclear weapons (which is only a 1950s technology), while countries in Africa are never going to do that. It’s the HBD, stupid.
What a fascinating thing to say!
In my opinion, it’s virtually impossible for a country with a mean genetic IQ below 93 to make nuclear weapons. Below an average genetic IQ of 93 (white norms), there are simply not enough geniuses to figure it out, and what few there are wont have enough smart teachers to guide them.
My guess is all human races can make nuclear weapons except for those who pre-Carleton Coon anthropologists crudely defined as “negroid” (including bushmen, pygmies, and the unrelated australoids).
I think a people’s ancestors needed at least some exposure to the incredible cognitive demands of the last ice age to have the power to either end civilization (nuclear weapons) or create it.
Indeed it was only after humanity had their wits sharpened by the Wurm glaciation that civilization may have been possible because before that ice age, no human race had a mean (genetic) IQ of 93+.
According to quickhistories.com:
In ancient history, six distinct “cradles” of civilisation are usually identified. These are the regions which appear to have developed civilisation independently or semi-independently.
The six cradles of civilisation were: Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, China, Mexico and Peru.
One curiosity is that, with the exception of China, which emerged a little later, each of these societies emerged around 3000 BCE – as if history’s light was suddenly switched on.
As Michael Hart implied for agriculture, I suspect civilization was likely in climates that were in or near the Goldilocks zone: warm enough to work with, but cold enough to have selected for 93+ IQ.
Pumpkin Person 
Adding up the average IQ of my family by race.
My genetic potential by race would be near 97.
I am 113 the test.
Your parents are all on the avg of their respective ethnicities**
no, that is why I said I am 113, the number 97 should clue you into that being the number of genetic potential PP talks about.
The fact you spelled German as Geremy makes me seriously question whether you have 113. My dad spells like you.
Last time you said I was higher than 113.
PP said he knew the reason I had bad spelling but would not tell me.
and very likely he has ZERO native american ancestry.
for every 4 people in the US who claim it, maybe 1 has it.
Good point Mugabe
I’m Jewish Iqbayliyen on my dad’s side (E1B1B1). 145 IQ Mensa, 6″3, 21 years old.
All my family are around 134 IQ average. That’s probably (?) my genetic IQ, but I am taller than the rest of my family by 3 inches, so that could just be increased brain size but the same genetic IQ. Taller height tends to dramatically increased IQ, I have observed. 6ft seems to almost be a requirement for higher thought.
what does mean a genetic IQ of 93 and where do you get this figure from
By genetic IQ of 93, I mean that assuming the Phenotype = Genotype + environment model, one would score IQ 93 (white norms) if reared in the developed world.
I arrived at the figure of 93 because the lowest IQ groups to produce nuclear weapons (south Asians) appear to have the genetic potential to average in the 90s if reared in First World conditions
Pakistan has nukes…
I think you need a much higher iq to invent it though. Kind of funny how the only practical invention of von neumann and einstein was a nuke.
[redacted by pp, sept 1, 2017]
I know Pakistan has nukes. Dark caucasoids appear to have the genetic potential to average in the mid 90s when reared in the developed world, unless they’re extremely inbred and/or mixed with sub-Saharan populations.
But that doesn’t explain why they have nukes if its about IQ.
I’m not saying it’s ONLY about IQ, but rather a country needs a MINIMUM AVERAGE GENETIC IQ of 93 to creates nukes, because without a mean IQ at least this high, they’re unlikely to have enough geniuses
You realise countries can hire scientists, right?
pakistanis are extremely inbreds and without european tech they would probably never developed nuclear bomb by themselves
I’m not saying it’s ONLY about IQ, but rather a country needs a MINIMUM AVERAGE GENETIC IQ of 93 to creates nukes, because without a mean IQ at least this high, they’re unlikely to have enough geniuses
Don’t see the need for such… precision – might as well say everyone can do it except Sub-Saharan Africans. 🙂
might as well say everyone can do it except Sub-Saharan Africans
Or those resembling them: Australian aboriginals, Papuan New Guineans and Andaman islanders probably can’t do it either. Basically all the groups considered “black” or “negroid” in the broadest sense of the term.
Philosopher,
She meant creating nukes by themselves.
Can Arab countries (say excluding Syria or Lebanon) create the atomic bomb? Does Libya actually have this technology or was it just rumor?
Could a country that’s predominantly Indio (like greater than 50%, like Bolivia) create the bomb?
K
But she used NK as the example. NK has nukes because the soviets gave them the tech. Just like the chinese. Wasn’t NK engineers.
but von neumann and einstein did NOT invent the nuke. nor did their theories have ANYTHING to do with its development.
otto hahn (german gentile) discovered nuclear fission.
he discovered how much energy it released.
the chain reaction was discovered by fermi (italian gentile).
the difficulty in the a-bomb is getting enough u-235 or pu.
the calculation of the critical mass was also important.
The interesting thing about tech is that it is usually much easier to copy. In economics theres a whole idea that third world countries should always have faster grwoth just based on copying technology.
What they dont explain is how standing beside a train makes someone richer. This is the osmosis fallacy of modern economics. I believe i am one of the first ove ever seen on any forum or blog to ask how technology actually makes the masses richer
It doesnt. There is no mechanism. Cobb douglas is gay. This os why most third and 2nd world groqth rates come from psure population growth.
In myppinion the only way tech makes nations richer is through domestic resistribution or mercantalism in terms of trade. I would guess im just rediscovering something marx wrote 200 years ago with this line of thought actually.
“Another reason why white racialists may have lower IQs is that focusing on racial IQ differences shows a lack of compassion for low IQ races, and such coldness may indicate low IQ, because if the emotional part of your brain is lacking, the cognitive part of your brain is probably lacking too, because the brain is all one organ. I’ve previously discussed this scene from The Iron Lady which tried to link Margaret Thatcher’s lack of compassion for the poor to the onset of dementia, showing her go on a hysterical rant against the less fortunate”.
#Pumpkin Person Greatest Hits
Thatcher was a clown.
But she was a diligent and smart clown.
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpousadaluadecristal.com.br%2Ftestimonials%2Fmedium%2Fmaggie-thatcher-dead-jokes-6714.jpg&f=1
I was in Britain when Thacther died. The media refused to show the mass celebrations. In truth, Thacthers dementia meant she was dead 15 years previously.
When you look at videos of her funeral there is hardly anyone there. Its because she was actually what caused britain to become poor. And so, Niall Ferguson defending Thacther economic policy is ridiculous.
You should watch The Irony Lady, philosopher. Perhaps the most brilliant biopic ever made. Very creative narrative structure by the female screenplay writer Abi Morgan and incredible performance by Meryl Streep as Thatcher. The film is an amazing display of what female minds can accomplish artistically.
I will have a look someday.
Yes, was very good. Just saw it there. I will watch Frost/Nixon tomorrow.
I don’t doubt her policies were economically shallow, as is most free market thinking. Free market economics are a seductive blind alley for the sharp mind that wants to understand the mechanisms of economy thoroughly, it takes a long time to go from understanding the market mechanisms at work on a smaller level to understanding Keynes at the higher level. But socially Thatcher was arguably a great force of pride for Britain, people remember her as strong if nothing else.
The ideal politician gives his people something to take pride in whilst also catering to the economic needs of the nation. To reconcile strength and economic competence. The right would lose too much face right now to adopt competent economic policies, but renewal in that direction is in order.
This is something I keep coming back to. The inability of aspergers people to understand that as you magnify outwards, a phenomenon grows in entropy. This is the same in physics, linguistics and theology. They just can’t see the big picture.
I suggest because they are bred not to be able to see it.
a paradox is that asperger’s economics serves master and thus serves the status and material ambitions of economists.
the asperger’s economist is advances socially precisely because he has no social intelligence.
would economic policies be more realistic and effective if engineers were the economists, if there were no academic departments of economics?
Maybe introducing a totally different group of autists unfamiliar with the literature and unaffected by the dogmas of the academia would result in a more or less objective analysis of the subject matter producing a truthful rendition of the facts.
Keynes was a mostly economics-illiterate Mathematician, maybe he stands as the model for successful economics analysis.
Of course, first you go Thatcher, then you go full ZIO.
Not good. The slippery slope to joining a satanic death cult is all too easy. People think Im crazy when I say most of the english speaking west is in a LITERAL death cult.
Just like people thought people in Russia were crazy about the gulags and show trials or people in Chile were crazy that the government would hire death squads to murder whole families and secretly bury the bodies in mass pits or that Khmer Rouge Year Zero was a euphemism for mass slaughter.
All these things happened less than 60 years ago. Think about what that means for the possibility I’m right.
all western euro countries are still >= 80% european. i predict that so-called “far-right” parties will gain power before the frog boils to death. [redacted by pp, sept 1, 2017]
blut und boden is just another way of saying “genes and environment” determine a national character, not “ideas”.
if france’s indigenes were replaced with haitians it would cease being french.
immigration from poland and other eastern european countries is far less a concern than non-european immigration. belgium has about a half million italians that came to work in its coal mines. this isn’t much of a problem for the flemish or walloons.
I hope youre right. Im pretty sure eastern europe and southern europe wont roll over. But not the germanic nations who are too nice.
Count the new generations and this 80% will be reduced to 70%,60% or less in some countries.
Yes, urban western Europe is much less than 80% white already.
Dick Advocaat is Holland manager? Wow. That man is ancient and was never good at any role. The Dutch have tons of great managers to choose and they chose him.
Lion is retarded. He reminds me of some of the guys youd see doing Phds. Just very slow.
LOL! No he’s extremely smart, just very biased on some topics that we wont discuss. But an insightful blogger who gets straight to the point. If you look at all the most successful bloggers, we all tend to be unbelievably intelligent. And indeed one would tend to be to dominate a field as competitive as internet blogging.
unbelievably intelligent…
Are you smarter than Lion of the Blogosphere?
I doubt I’d score as well on the SAT/GRE/LSAT as he did, but I don’t know how he’d do on the Wechsler. He seems to have a large verbal > performance split judging by what he’s said about his video game talent. On the other hand he’s a good visual artist so his performance IQ might be higher than Daniel Seligman’s (who had so much in common with Lion).
On the other hand Lion comes from Staten Island which is a sign of low IQ genes, but they’re Jewish low IQ genes so how low can they be?
He seems slow. I bet of you threw a pen at his head hed react 10 minutes afterwards.
HBD is just a three letter word – to give it to the blacks.
Lion’s major flaw — he speaks highly of East Asians for the wrong reasons — HBDers who live in the West understand East Asians are incompatible with Western values.
This blog attracts some of the most mentally ill people on earth. Fine line between genius and insanity.
I get very offended when pumpkin mentions he is very intelligent and it takes a lot of talent and intelligence to be an internet blogger.
Any fool can start a blog, but to be one of the top bloggers generally takes high IQ
I like my blog. (I also like pumpkins blog)
Usually you need find a popular ideology. The rest you can improvise some insights and write properly. But I doubt smarter bloggers are popular. The principle is the same to any type of entertainment or activity. Smarter your blog is specially to its language or country less people will read it, at priori.
About Lion I don’t doubt if a large reaction of their readers are Jews if he tend to attract co-inter-nationals as well hbdeara.
Fraction and not reaction
peepee is the only black lesbian with an IQ over 0.
Invent nuclear weapons and use them against other human groups is one of the most dumbest things ever to so with this type of material. But don’t care, they have”higher IQ”, they know what they are doing. It’s everything on control.
making an a-bomb is not hard. if i had $100m i could do it using mexicans i hired at the home depot parking lot.
I think there may be a strong chance anime is a very very high IQ troll.
The mark of a genius is to take joy in simple play.
Cardcaptors Opening English HD
Hamtaro Opening USA
The commenter Lazy Glossophiliac actually made a very similar point several years ago:
In regards to North Korea: how’s that Sudanese nuclear weapons program coming along? Any 100-story hotels put up with the help of local engineering talent? Come to think of it, did even any of Dubai’s high-rise projects use local engineering talent? If the US government ever became so displeased with Congo-Brazzaville as to wish to contain it, how many troops would it need to use? 400? 4,000? 40,000? How long would they have to stay? How much money would have to be spent on this?
HBD is mostly an Anglo Prole phenomenon, because the Anglos are by far the most contradicting of imperialists, who neither destroy nor assimilate their subjects due to a lack of ruthlessness and a lack of culture.
Although I find HBD with a grain a truth, it is nothing but useless drivel and a pseudo intellectual-circle jerking in the Anglo Sphere given its capitalistic nature. Anglo Elites need 3rd world low IQ inferiors the same way Walmart needs legions of low level employees to operate its business empire.
Just reading up on Chinese history when Western imperialists namely the Portuguese and the British set soil on China, the agendas from these 2 entities couldn’t be more different than night and day with a demographic that was significantly more intelligent than those of Africa and the Americas. The Portuguese brought religion and foreign culture to the Chinese, and intermarried with them. The British could hardly budge an inch in this department. Neither was Hong Kong of any meaningful value to the British who only brought Anglo commerce into China.
Not ‘anglos’ but specifically brits. A mix of anglo (german/jutes?) and local british island blood probably produced a people that are less prone to use physical violence than other europeans. Infact so much that they used infected cloth as gifts to native americans to kill them. They couldnt just get themselves to kill the native americans directly as much as other europeans did.
I’m watching frost/nixon and Ron Howard (who is a gigantic liberal), portrays Nixon like Frank Grimes but with extreme avarice. I’m not sure that is historically accurate, but its very funny!
I think Nixon even with Ron Howard directing is still quite sympathetic. Theres a moment one hour in where he asks if Frost was about to marry a singer, and clarified if she was black and shook his head. At which point everyone goes silent in sanctimony. This silence exists mostly in liberals minds around the question of genetics. Because they are in a trance.
The other key part which supports my theory that Watergate was a coup is when Frost repeately quotes a transcript where NIxon repeately tells people to bribe Mark Hunt, a ‘burglar’ to shut up. It implies Hunt was being troublesome.
Mark Hunt was also seen in Dallas on the JFKs assasination according to CIA sources Talbot talked to. He also admitted on his deathbed to his son he was involved in the assassination. This is all in the Devils Chessboard.
Hunt was Allen Dulles right hand man or in his inner coterie.
We also know deep throat was the deputy director of the FBI. We know the Wash Po has been the deep states mind control ray gun since the 50s and Operation Norhwoods.
Put it all together and you get a complicated picture whereby some mixture of jews and some gentile elites wanted to get rid of Nixon.
I wanted to watch this movie as I believe Nixons coup is the most important event in 20th century history, as it was the changing of the guard to the Zionists from the protestant elite of America.
Nixons’s soliloquy about being a modest man and never being accepted or respected by the 400, the snobs, the elites makes sense in that context of being toppled. Frost actually agrees with Nixon that there is a glass ceiling of a sort no matter what you achieve.
Nixons social commentary on things like what peoples shows say about them etc reminds me of myself. Always analysing, sorting and labelling things. Very deep thinker.
i think there is a tape where nixon agrees to the burglary.
so he was a crook. bot hitch and chomsky both regarded watergate as a coup.
nixon and g h w bush were the last republicans who weren’t insane on economic issues.
g h w bush raised taxes after promising he never would in his acceptance speech at the GOP convention. “read my lips”. that took courage which no establishment republican has today.
Yes, genetically superior mongoloids and caucasoids can create nukes, not [redacted by pp, sept 2, 2017] negroid who is btw the only race who never created any kind of civilisation.
Interesting article.
Nixon was right, He was not a natural politician. But he is a heart warming example of meritocracy. You can be a modest person and rise up through bloody mindedness, willpower and spicy zest of paranoid personality disorder.
Watergate was not the first time he was scheming. You imagine he learned a lot of tricks from his mentor Dulles who handpicked him for a career.
Again detailed in Devils Chessboard, the most important history book of the last 100 years.
The extent of a countries religiosity may be linked to how susceptible they are to silver tongued gamma male preachers like jews.
But that wouldn’t explain Italy. You imagine Italians have to be the most socially intelligent of major Western nations which is why they have always had the best interior ministers and select anti immigration politicians down the line.
Italy will survive longer than Germany as a nation.
Remember – Hitler copied most of his ideology from Mussolini. Mussolini came first.
Italys long decline might be an example of people selecting for social intelligence rather than engineering excellence in Britain/Germany. You get more corruption and bribery. But you never let jews own 50% of wealth as in the UK and Germany. Notice the way Rothschild never got going in Naples after he sent his son there unlike Vienna, Frankfurt, Paris and London. Italian philosophers tend to be more infatuated with social phenomena. Germans about abstractions and dictionaries.
all europeans outside italy and greece have an inferiority complex. they know that they’re barbarians. they don’t know how to be civilized. so they overdue it in the mimicking of what they think is civilized behavior.
anecdote: there’s a statue in manhattan of columbus. some are calling for its removal. who’s opposing it? italian americans. columbus was an italian.
taking this bs to its extreme washington dc would have to change its name. columbia university and colombia the country would have to change their names.
the Spanish aren’t really Europeans, and the Frenchmen are sort of trying to have the best of the both worlds of Southern and Northern Europe.
if it’s hbd then italians are immune to jewish influence because they are so similar to jews genetically. iirc the 50% of ashkenazi dna from europe is from italy.
Italian Jews had a better experience with life than let’s say German Jews, despite the latter being more successful in things like banking and science.
Anglosphere countries are where the money is, which is why Jews and East Asians are found in large numbers.
This post scarcity world as a result of the glut produced by the Anglosphere — Southern Europeans knew a long time ago, that consumerism wasn’t the good life.
If having enough geniuses supply was the only a question, an IQ test immigration policy with a life-tax exemption or scholarship would do the job of getting the +150 IQ people (at least in attractive countries). There must be a second condition : having an infrastructure that foster develoment. This criteria entails that somehow, you’ve got a segregated places and/or casts with average IQ above 110 to allow the flux of knowledge and wealth to happen. That is far more difficult to get. Creating a NYC or a Silicon Valley. I’m impressed by the irish people. 80% of their migrants have a master or phD degree and they have been importing brain power massively since 20 years now. And it has served them well ! It looks like the easiest way for big countries is having a highly segregated society. Falling apart (as Murray said) makes more sense in this regard than national union. It would be ironic i HBD termes Trump would be wrong in helping the good average american guy and Clinton would be right in treating them as deplorables and favouring the top 0.1% …
They already did that in the many european countries in the medieval ages and early 20th century America. These high IQ people were called ‘jews’.
100% I would rather my country be infested with malaria than take on 150IQ jews for the odd social media website or hollywood movie.
proposition:
in a genuine democracy almost every measure or candidate would win 80% support or more.
but mass media and education convinces people to focus on non-issues or otherwise think in a way which is bad for them, against their own interests.
discuss amongst youselves.
Where there is no minorities yes.
Switzerland has direct referenda on laws. The Economist was very angry they voted to ban minarets and stop open borders to Namibia. Very angry. Rothschild is very upset the Swiss have the gall to say to Namibian Non or Nein.
In my opinion Israel should be forced to take on 10 congolese for every Syrian refugee Norway takes as according to the Economist’s own articles on immigration which I can link to if you want, that will make them richer diverse and more innovative.
Workers do exhausting work. They are drained of energy to have time to think. Media gives them a release from tension by relaxation or stimulation. All troubles can be alieved with by delivering the right emotional state. Media has been studying the psychology of people for a long time. Their basic drives and the categories of personality that determine behavior threw identity. Analytics are super advanced now that we have computers and the internet. Targeted advertising is now the next big thing. The old media is now in competition with the new media. The prediction that Hillary would win was played everywhere in the news. But then Trump won and collectively the left collapsed into super confusion and dread. The old media and the establishment need to project an image that things are working. They need to do this because of what has been learned from the entire history of media. Instability is bad and stability is good. The radio was used by FDR to prevent a communist revolution. 30 million died in Russia after 1920 to 1940. Hitler used media to control the masses. America needed to use the media to keep capitalism stable. They needed to know the psychology of the human being to control it so the darkest side of man would not emerge. The danger of a free society is that ideas can be used to manipulate the masses into a mob. A mob destroys the civility of a nation. The cost of keeping a society stable is in the control of ideas.
The control of ideas is always a battle. It is why all civilizations are hierarchically structured. And it is why different factions fight to control the narrative. The way the US is run, people are elected that will follow orders of the corporations and the intelligence agencies. The US is a corporatocracy and the media plays to this. Consumerism was invented in the 1950’s because of the great depression. The goal is to keep as many people employed as possible and to never let the economy falter. Controls are set in place to regulate everything so there are never any extremes in the system. But the results are never perfect and people are only partially predictable. The media saw Hillary as the stable candidate because she would obey orders. Trump won because his ideas penetrated into the minds of the people of the states he won. Like Pensivenia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The system does not want to change because change is seen as bad. Things would get worse because people up top see things working and do not want to rock the boat. The self-interest of the individual is sacrificed for the collective interest of the system. Trump saw that the system did not work for many people and that is where he began his campaign. The media projects the status quo. They tell people what ever will distract them from important issues because if they knew the important issues then the system would change and the people behind the media do not want instability.
Trump has destabilized many of the controls that were in place by the establishment. Trump used his superior intelligence to awaken the self-interests of his followers. I voted for Trump because I saw him on the TV at the senior center my aunt walks to each day. He said, “I promise I will never let you down”. – The media is desperately trying to stop him because they want the system to stay the way it is. Because of the disruption caused by Trump being elected president people are thinking ideas that were not given to them by the media. They do not know what controls they can put in place to pacify people away from these new destabilizing ideas.
Kind of bizarre how you can be lucid sometimes. This is a good analysis.
holy fuck that was amazing
[redacted by pp, sept 3, 2017]
here’s a map showing the dates of jewish expulsions. at the beginning of ww ii there were only about 200k jews in germany proper. almost all of europe’s jews lived in eastern europe. why? they had been expelled from western europe.
what was the difference between the nazis’ and previous explusions?
the nazis couldn’t expel the jews in their territory, because they were surrounded by the allied armies and navies.
self-defense is recognized as a legitimate reason for violence. when the alternative is to be killed or maimed then the victim has the right to use violence.
What was it that the Jews were doing or going to do that extermination of them could be called self-defence?
The expulsion could have taken place before Germany was surrounded. They did control Poland, France, Italy, Spain and the Bulkiness in 1941. The Mediterranian was under the control of the Italian navie before 1941 I would think? What was it that really delayed the expulsion? The route to Palestine was completely open a long time.
I think Hitler was just lazy and single minded. He fucked up the invasion of Russia because he sucked at planning. By attacking Russia with poor planning FDR saw this as opportunistic for the allies. And since Mien Kunf already mentioned the Jews this showed his feelings from the very beginning after world war one. He had every opportunity to transport the Jews to Palestine but was filled with hate too much. His attempt to unify Europe as the new Roman empire with pagan occult practices splintered Germany with the Berlin Wall. Reactionary movements always fail. Hitler invaded country after country because he did not know what else to do. There was no plan because reactionism only thinks tactically not strategically. The master race thing is not a plan. It is an idealism. It makes people feel better and Hitler had his scientists working on mind control. But that is not a reason to invade country after country. World domination makes no sense. It’s like Warner brother Pinky and the Brain. There is no reason to rule the world. Once Hitler started invading neighboring countries that is all he could think of doing. Which makes no sense until you realize Nazism and the Third Reich were just reactionary movements. “do something, do anything because we cannot do nothing”. The “just do something” politics of “making it up as you go” cannot achieve much in the end. That is why Hitler never sent the Jews to Palestine. The goals of Germany at the time were ill-defined and patch together.
Globus – Europa [HD]
In my opinion, specific tribes of Middle Eastern Jews are the smartest people to have ever walked the earth, Ashkenazim (Whites mixed with pure Jews) following close behind.
Iqbayli Jews. All my family are 134+ IQ. Ashkenazim are between this and White IQ.
Specific Arab tribes are also very very clever, but the majority of Arab tribes are borderline retarded, some even being mixed with sub-Saharan (Yemeni tribes). Arabs are very tribal even to this day, and so are Jews, so it’s bad practice to measure Arabs as an entire ‘group’ when the genetics of their individual peoples are so different.
Which country are you from ?
Algeria, Tizi Ouzou in Kabyle, live in UK
Why are you saying Arabs? Those are Berber tribes. There are no arab genes in North Africa. Arabs are only in Arabian Peninsula in the middle east. If you’re really a Kabyle you’d know they are Berbers with their own Berber culture, language, genes and flag.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/08/31/myth-30-iq-communication-range/#.WatmB6a5eSF
This Culture of Critique is a very good book. Have you actually read it pumpkin?
I would find it difficult to believe you have based on the things youve said.
Nothing I’ve said is inconsistent with kevin macdonald theory
Have you read the book?
No but I’m very familiar with his theory and nothing I’ve said is inconsistent with it.
A lot of the things you say are inconsistent with it. In the same way Bill Gates is.
Name one thing I’ve said that’s inconsistent with it.
You seem to think anyone who says or does anything positive towards blacks is brainwashed by Jews, as if 100% of blacks are such awful people that brainwashing is required to like any of them.
^^^
BINGO!
BINGO!
Do you not think blacks might have some genuine gifts that make them worthy of admiration (i.e. charisma, athleticism, rhythm, sexual potency)?
“Do you not think blacks might have some genuine gifts that make them worthy of admiration (i.e. charisma, athleticism, rhythm, sexual potency)?”
Bullshit, they are worthless ^^
I think MacDonald is right that jews subverted academia first, before the media and then of course, government/courts.
But I suppose the conclusion you have to draw is that gentiles lower verbal IQ allowed them to commit the intellectual fraud and as a group evolutionary strategy, they simply used their strengths to argue chimera in open battle.
To a large degree in the 1940s, a gentile unlike now was free top argue with Boas and his cult and obviously those that did, did not win.
It was interesting finding out Boasian anthropology seems to have preceded the Frankfurt ‘philosophers’ in the way Zion changed the way (low VIQ) whites see their reality.
Also, I really do not consider Arabs stupid by birth. They are stupid, yes, but I think it’s a consequence of poisonous ideas. If indoctrinated from birth, anyone afflicted with Islam will be mentally unable to question as they have been indoctrinated into a cult from which there is no return and to question what simply ‘is’ is a grave sin in the eyes of god and the community.
I would compare it to the dark ages of China. While Chinese are very clever, the situation at the time stifled all creativity/knowledge/intellectual pursuits due to a poisonous idea/culture.
Arabs that are not Muslim have far higher IQs and I’d go so far as to say they are smarter or as smart as whites.
I am talking about Quraysh Arabs, not sub-Saharan ‘Arabs’ like Yemeni or half of Saudi Arabia. Those Arabs are sub-human.
They are really just as clever if not smarter than whites if you remove the Islamic poison from their minds.
There is allot about Islam I think is anti-human. I tried to explain this some time ago in comments here. But some people called me an Islamaphobe. First of all, Muhamid was a war lord and that is was all right to kill people to spread the faith. They still believe in stonings. And when they say Ala is merciful what that means is that merciful for infidels to be killed if they do not convert. The Christian God is merciful in the exact opposite way, not by killing non-believers but by showing kindness to people that hate you.
The only part of the religion I respect is Sufism. Because it is Islamic mysticism. Believing in mysticism makes you passive and devoted to an eternal spirit of inclusivity. You do not need to fight anyone and prays is not a ritual but a way to purify oneself and become indwelt by the divine presence. Having a divine presence inside you, you are less likely to hate infidels and see them as needing the same connection you have so they will be converted by experiencing divinity and not by converting them with a blade into their chest.
In a video on by the computing forever youtube channel he read an article that 1,000 girls went missing in Germany and are suspected to have been kidnaped to become child brides to Muslims that have entered the country. This is not a good situation at all. Stories I hear from the net say Muslims from time to time sexually assault girls at swimming pools because of what they say is that they are having a sexual emergency. Many parts of Europe are not safe to go because you could get raped. In Sweden the had out bracelets to girls that say please don’t rape me. This bracelet is supposed to protect them from Muslims that want to rape them. This is not to say all Muslims are like this but I think at least 10 percent are extremists.
The extreme 10 percent I have also heard do not believe women have souls.
Notice the way jews are doing the censorship stiflement and imposing a cult on whites in the West as well Fenoopy. This is why over the past 20 years, the most famous invention has been a social media website and an online cataloguing service called Amazon.
Sad!
why would a man say such things? why is asking this very question not permitted?
They were all tested and their average IQ (by the time) is 130.
[I’m not fan of Flynn deflation because IQ is a relative value (ranking) and not absolute value and it is impossible to know if people have gain in g or s or something else. Woodley of menie has even good arguments to say that IQ has been going down since the 19th century using Galton and Swedish physicans psychometrics data on processing speed and working memory. We should take the IQ as they were at the time]
1 Hjalmar Schacht 143
2 Arthur Seyss-Inquart 141
3 Hermann Goering 138
4 Karl Doenitz 138
5 Franz von Papen 134
6 Eric Raeder 134
7 Dr. Hans Frank 130
8 Hans Fritsche 130
9 Baldur von Schirach 130
10 Joachim von Ribbentrop 129
11 Wilhelm Keitel 129
12 Albert Speer 128
13 Alfred Jodl 127
14 Alfred Rosenberg 127
15 Constantin von Neurath 125
16 Walther Funk 124
17 Wilhelm Frick 124
18 Rudolf Hess 120
19 Fritz Sauckel 118
20 Ernst Kaltenbrunner 113
21 Julius Streicher 106
There is no genious and the highest IQ are in finance or hold the highest rank. So this data goes in the sense of Pumpkin theories.
Else, I doubt jewish where expelled because they hurted society but because they weren’t christian. They were no muslim, no budhist ,in Europe.
I’m not fan of Flynn deflation because IQ is a relative value (ranking) and not absolute value and it is impossible to know if people have gain in g or s or something else.
Well even if you don’t think the Flynn effect reflects a genuine increase in intelligence, and thus feel no need to correct for people taking old tests at the time they were normed, it’s still necessary to correct for it in when people take old tests long after they’ve been normed, otherwise you’re ranking is with respect to the wrong cohort.
Woodley of menie has even good arguments to say that IQ has been going down since the 19th century using Galton and Swedish physicans psychometrics data on processing speed and working memory. We should take the IQ as they were at the time
I’ve seen no convincing evidence that working memory has significantly decreased. Reaction time probably has, but it may just be an artifact of increased height (more distance for nerve impulses to travel), increased weight (heavier arms move slower) and less physical fitness (people today are slow, tired, drugged out and sluggish, despite being bright)
Brain size has likely increased at least 1.3 SD since Victorian times, suggesting at least a 0.45(1.3 SD) of the Flynn effect reflects a real increase in phenotypic intelligence
Yes, I agree. Logic on your side, Pumpkin.
Now I’m remembering something that Woodley of Menie could use :
Taxi driver in Lonon were the best paid in the world (NY being at the opposite end). The reason was that to get the free licence, you had to pass an exam called The knowledge consisting of remembering 25 000 streets.
After this massive memory effort, the hippocampi and increased the volume of gray matter. In other study, they found that the IQ had gone down 2 points on average after 5 years dedicated to storing this knowledge.
So it may be possible that bigger brains could serve to use computers, have more dexterous fingers, being more sensitive to porn movies on screens etc. without increasing g.
Naturally, the burden of the proof relies on the one making such an hypothesis. But it is not completely inamaginable.
Click to access 4398.full.pdf
I’ve never seen a study where overall brain size increased as a result of intellectual stimulation. Besides the increased brain size over the 20th century is observed at birth, and thus caused by improvements to the BIOLOGICAL environment, not culture. That doesn’t necessarily mean its related to g, but it does mean it’s related to real intelligence.
The poignant thing about this speech is that today, to many in the alt right, arab world and eastern europe, these words will resonate throughout history.
I predict in 20 years, the Nazis will be seen much more sympathetically by those 3 groups and people will understand why.
The nazi loved the muslim :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Waffen_Mountain_Division_of_the_SS_Handschar_(1st_Croatian)
The true founder of palestinian state was himself a nazi :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini
They have been dozens of followers. Lots of former nazi banker in switzeland have helped Islam.
There is also a jewish old lady, who is even more conspirationist than you are, and she thinks there is a european union and international projects to create an Eurabia in order to islamize europe and kill the jews. She admitted that her theories are sort of “protocol of the elders of Bruxelles”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_Ye%27or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurabia
Pumpkin, are we sure that the brain size gain is at birth ? It would be interesting to compare data on evolution of brain size at birth and at adult age. And even to know wich part of the brain has really grown (for both stage).
If we had either a bigger cranial capacity or a bigger prefrontal cortex at birth, that would be it. At adult age (20 yo), that would be something good too.
If, on the contrary its the other parts of the brain, that are bigger, and at adult age only, that wouldn’t tell us much I guess about “g”.
It would be wonderful if there was a paper presenting those data clearly. That is not complicated, or is it ?
Well Lynn cites a study claiming the head circumference of British 1-year-olds increased 1.5 cm over 50 years. I strongly suggest you read Lynn’s landmark 1989 paper. He argued that the Flynn effect in school kids is 100% explained by nutrition. I think that’s an overestimate, but it’s fascinating nonetheless.
Lynn also believes we’re getting genetically dumber, but thinks good nutrition trumps bad genes.
Bruno, you should also check out this paper by Lynn, where he notices that the Flynn effect is just as large, if not larger on infant tests.
Thankq Pumpkin. Thats exactly my intuition except I think in most country dysgebic tendencies now are stronger than nutrition gains … We lost 20% of our brain with agriculture. We took back half of it. And now it is down again. I d like to have cranial capacity and frontal cortex data too to better evaluate the recent gain morphology.
I’m actually not convinced there’s been dysgenics, mostly cause digit span, which is not sensetive to nutrition gains, has not changed over the 20th century
Lost 20% of our brain with agriculture? Hard to believe.
Agriculture caused massive malnutrition that shrunk our brains and height, but we’ve probably recovered it during the 20th century.
I’ve not read the first one from Lynn yet. I read a study about height saying their is dysgenics everywhere and people would be shorter if it werent for nutrition. One a rare spot of eugenic evolution is the Netherlands were there is a positive correlation among stature and fertility and that would explain why male are +15 cm taller when US/French etc are +6 cm only. For spanish, it is because of the nutrition evolution wich was greater (dictorship time after civil war).All that seems very similar to what Lynn wrote about IQ.
Hope you’re right.
Iran is very close to a nuclear weapon, like a year if it wished to do so. But Iran has 100 mio+ population and no army to be afraid off. The US and SA can’t rly wage a war against them.
It is speculated that both countries (NK and Iran) have the variola virus so any invasion could result in a world wide catastrophe. It’s not the nukes!
damn, I meant 80 and perspectively 100+
I’m surprised biological warfare hasn’t become more of a thing already.
Spill the beans pumpkin. You are a data hoarder and it seems people are eager to leave all kind of data in here, I’m pretty sure by now you have the avg iq of the native americans by latitude, is there sth interesting?
Actually you don’t get that much useful data running a blog like this because my readership is so self-selected and so selective about what they report
Pumpkin, what is the total race mix of the 6 first civilizations ? Even using guesstimates for Egyptian to know in wich proportion asian/white/black people contributed to this area …. (maybe the world would have been more high IQ and scientific oriented with Neanderthal winning the war against homo sapiens sapiens).
All civilization was created by mongoloids & dark caucasoids
I d like to consume cranial capacity and head teacher-on cortex data too to better evaluate the recent addition morphology. Well Lynn cites a survey claiming the head teacher circumference of British 1-year-olds increased 1.5 cm over 50 years.