Here’s an interesting video by a female HBDer named Tara McCarthy interviewing a self-described 160 IQ Jamaican:
I don’t doubt that the Jamaican is extremely bright, judging from the speed and fluency of his answers, the wisdom and open-mindedness of his opinions, and the nature of his career (computer programming in Japan) but only one in 30,000 Americans by definition have a deviation IQ of 160+ (U.S. norms), which is 159+ (white norms), on any given test.
In theory, only about one in 2.5 million black Americans should have an IQ this high, and the odds are even less in his birth country of Jamaica which has worse nutrition and less white admixture (which is relevant if you’re an HBDer), although the Gaussian curve is a statistical abstraction seldom perfectly observed in nature. Non-pathological Americans as a whole are forced to perfectly fit the Gaussian curve by IQ test designers, but subgroups like blacks and whites might depart from it at the extremes, depending on the nature of the test.
The host of the show has a kind of quiet intelligence and I bet a lot of the dirty old men in the HBD-o-sphere and alt-right are delighted to see a young attractive blue eyed woman embracing and normalizing their views. Meanwhile liberals are probably shaking in their boots.
Pumpkin Person 
otherwise known as “HBD chick”!
For those who don’t know you’re joking, she is NOT HBD chick.
i’m NOT joking.
most prominent (supposed) female HBD blogger + british = she’s HBD chick.
how do you know she’s not?
NOT trolling.
how do you know she’s not?
Because why wouldn’t she just admit it and increase her viewership? It’s not like she’s hosting a politically correct show and needs to hide her HBD views.
so your theory is…
british female HBDer gets jared taylor as an interview and is NOT the only female HBDer (who also happens to be british)?
i admit…
she’s A LOT better looking, and sounding, than i imagined.
She’s able to land big name guests because she’s good looking, not because she’s HBD chick.
then HBD chick must be REALLY PISSED OFF!
this no name is stealing my thunder!
No thats not her. I’ve seen HBD chick.
British accents are ugly.
So this is hbdchick interviewing jayman?
LOL
i remember HBDChick mentioning on her blog that she was married. This youtuber is not married I believe.
half-jew bourdain said in germany of all places…surprise?
no i think that’s the only solution. the whole world becomes coffee colored.
he did NOT appreciate his own profundity.
sexual racism is, ala freud, the ultimate cause of all other racism.
sad!
I always find it creepy when good looking whites are racist and I’ve always suspected the racism is often just lookism.
but if afro and melo aren’t you…
they’re counter-examples.
my taste may not be the exact average of white men, but it’s pretty close.
and in my case i never think consciously about skin color or whatever european features.
that’s the thing about sex.
it’s there.
or it’s NOT there.
they’re counter-examples.
Because they can get white women?
and in my case i never think consciously about skin color or whatever european features.
But you don’t find black looking black woman attractive. You’ve made that very clear.
yesss!
i AM a sexual racist.
in general
but even in deepest darkest black africa there are beautiful women…to me.
there are!
i recall a doc on ebola in congo.
she survived!
knock-out!
i wanted to shuck corn!
but that would’ve been a mesalliance even if i conned her into liking my john holmes.
she was physically attractive, but she didn’t even speak french.
AND NO! MOTHERFUCKER! BECAUSE I LIKE PALE, DRUG ADDICTED LESBIANS…DOES NOT MEAN THAT I THINK EVERYONE SHOULD.
AFRO LIKES HIS FELLOW MONKEY PEOPLE…LIKE THE ARMENIAN KIM KARDASHIAN.
MORE POWER TO HIM!
JUST DON’T CALL ME A “RACIST” BECAUSE I’M NOT DOWN WITH THAT.
“I always find it creepy when good looking whites are racist and I’ve always suspected the racism is often just lookism.”
Can you elaborate ?
Can you elaborate ?
A lot of good looking whites find non-whites ugly and don’t want ugly people in their country and thus support white nationalism.
Too bad I had my phone stolen because I really wanna call bullshit.
why don’t dem speakers at the dem national convention just NAME white pathologies?
because, as chomsky rightly observes, they’ve given up on poor white people.
why don’t they say…
the problems with america include…
1. obesity
2. professional wrestling
3. american cars
4. evangelical “christians”
5. facial hair
poor white people SUCK!
let’s get the wave going!
poor white people SUCK!
but why do they suck?
why?
why?
you see gross people.
you hate them.
maybe you look in the mirror and see a gross person.
maybe you hate yourself.
maybe you don’t care.
is it all down to the individual?
this is the fundamental DELUSION of america.
I can’t program.
I am sad.
160 IQ is high.
I did create a meta-model of intelligence.
I followed Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy that perception is all there is.
dear God!
if you can read and understand The Critique of Pure Reason then…
you can teach yourself ANY CS.
hard:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/535746bae4b049723f707ddf/t/53688455e4b0915380a2f39a/1399358550960/Critique+of+Pure+Reason
easy:
sorry.
hard:
easy:
Reading and understanding are not the same thing.
I often find the ‘texture’ or deeper meaning of a text is only revealed through other allusions or experiences years later.
Poetry is the artistic promulgation of that. You have to read alot of the classics before some of it makes more sense.
If perception is everything then that means we got intelligence tests all wrong. The mind is a map of reality and if that map has defects or if that map is high resolution then that means mental manipulation is all dependent of how well you see the world. Autists can’t see faces and schizos see things that don’t exist. It’s al about causality. Abstraction is the perception of multiple things at once. And relationships are perceptions of multiple things at once. we recognize differences and similarities. And we put them together in our minds and it is all happening is parallel. Culture simply means that the number of things in of heads need t be taken into consideration. Because “theory of mind” is about knowing what is in the heads of other people. The intel is the information that flows through your brain neurons. Creativity is putting it all together. So Kant is right that the map in the head is intelligence. because we can only know the map. And some people have better maps. This makes them capable of manipulating the world. And that makes them good at IQ tests. But IQ tests don’t measure every way you can manipulate the world because IQ tests cannot measure the total map inside a person. It is a quant test, not a quality test. The person with an IQ of 160 can handle multiple items in his head at the same time. I believe a computer could do the same. All the computer would have to do is make a map of a person or the environment and it would be able to act intelligence. It would be super cool If I was 160 because I could hold everything in my head without forgetting the steps needed to do projects.
i think peepee has bought into this uni-polar world of beauty where…
marlon bradon and ingrid bergman are the paradigms and all others…
are beautiful only to the extent that they approximate marlon and ingrid.
that’s NOT just the way it is.
i mean…
that’s the way it is for ME…
not other people.
beauty is NOT in the eye of the beholder, BUT…
it’s NOT objective either.
Even in non-white countries, lighter skin and more Caucasian features are considered more attractive, although this could partly be the legacy of colonialism.
“considered”? by women?
i know some kenyan women bleach their skin. ala michael jackson.
but do kenyan men actually care?
anyway. you have sock puppets on your blog who disagree.
and a tan DOES make most white people look BETTER…
but the reason isn’t as simple as darker skin is more attractive…
1. a tan is more than darker skin. the skin has a sheen. it’s burnt.
2. as the dermotologist in LA told me…a tan “destroys contrast”…that means that imperfections minor and major, variations in skin color…they’re rendered un-notice-able.
3. the class explanation is bullshit. what’s that? it used to be, supposedly, that fair skin marked high class…no need to work in the sun. then it meant…you can afford to take a month long vacation to hawaii every year.
class explains almost everything.
it does NOT explain this.
white folks with a tan or just a burn, if they can’t tan, are OBJECTIVELY more beautiful.
i’m lucky. basque genes maybe.
i’m sickly pale.
but sun.
i’m darker than afro.
She sounds so stupid, it’s awful.He seems to be a very nice – he listened to many videos she made – and an articulate. He was born in Canada and grown up in NY city in a white neighborhood. I don’t know more because i couldn’t listen more than 15 minutes.
As for his IQ, not discarding he could be a 4sigma, I remember that Mensa often measure IQ with Cattell test ie a sd24 meaning an IQ just above the 1% instead.
Are you a feminist ?
i fear peepee wants to believe that mixed race marriage is Cynical.
it isn’t.
marriage is un-Cynical.
mixed-race marriage is at least as un-Cynical as same-race marriage.
julia and winston SHOULD have been punished.
but not killed.
didn’t realize until recently steve porcaro of toto also wrote Human Nature:
Actually meant to post this. The original lyrics were beautiful
randy west described porn acting thus…
it’s like beating off, except you have a person.
this explains part of sexual racism in adults. it does not explain why puberty is the dividing line between self-segregation and incognizant-integration.
what do i mean?
i mean even if the other person is very physically attractive, if there’s nothing in common it’s like beating off, except you have a person.
afro doesn’t care.
when ai sexbots come out, he’ll buy a dozen.
sad!
Dr. Murray said this again and I thought it fit well here.
I listened to this whole interview. The Jamaican seemed super-smart but I still doubt his 160 IQ score. maybe more like 140.
If it’s a childhood IQ test then his adult score is probably lower, the means are different.
“only one in 30,000 Americans by definition have a deviation IQ of 160+ (U.S. norms), which is 159+ (white norms), on any given test.”
Far more people claim to have a 160+ IQ than you’d expect, given that 160 is commonly cited as being 4 standard deviations above the mean.
However, there’s a simple explanation which does not involve them lying. These people probably took the Cattell Culture Fair test, which is routinely used as the entry test for Mensa. The standard deviation on that test is 24, as opposed to the 15 which is used on the Wechsler tests that’s widely reference in research.
Because of the different s.d., a score of 160 on the Cattell test is just 2.5 standard deviations above the mean, not 4, so it’s much less rare than 160 on Wechsler.
Incidentally, the max possible score on the Cattell test is 161.
I know about the 24 SD used in the Cattell but I assumed that test is mostly used in the UK, which is not where the Jamaican was likely tested.
Genetic Variation is not normally distributed anyways, so there could be more people than a standard gaussian model, right?
Genetic Variation is not normally distributed
It’s not?
Well, no. There’s a bump on the left-hand tail due to conditions such as Down Syndrome that cause intellectual deficits. Also, a large population is often made up of multiple sub-populations (to some degree endogamous) that have different means and/or variances, causing the overall distribution to be uneven and perhaps multimodal. On top of that, the distribution could be skewed for some reason (e.g., part of the population has a higher fertility rate than another part). This these things typically won’t show up in an IQ test that’s standardized for that population, because of the way test constructors start with an _assumed_ normal curve, and then map ranked raw scores onto the curve.
But I think you know this.
Agreed – the Catell’s test is commonly used in Poland, which sometimes results in comical misunderstandings, when someone claims that “such and such actress is as bright as Einstein”
She is hideous looking
I agree. People think she’s attractive?
i was referring to what she looked like in a previous vid.
she’s whored it up big time in this one.
I find her cute, I rate her 65%. Don’t like the hairdo and ridiculously unnatural eyebrows. But she can get it.
Well no, after seeing more of her, she’s only 50% and she can’t get it.
I find her cute,
You can find her cute all you want. She would not find you cute.
That’s what you think. I’m pretty sure she wouldn’t mind getting blacked.
https://www.blacked.com/
the fact that Afro called her a 65% is more proof that not only does he have bad taste when it comes to homes but he has even worse taste when it comes to women.
when the best you can get is an ugly sephardic girl then obviously your experience with women has been very poor .
” blacked ”
that porn company was founded by a jew
its so sad that blacks like you need a 24/7 jewish media to make you desirable to sexually frustrated “white” women.
Like Robert says, afros reference for what is ‘normal’ seems to be whatever a paedophile obese gamma male jew tells him. I find that hilarious. But thats just me.
Wanna bet something dummy jimmy ?
she looks tired
Yeah philibuster, that’s just you and your fellow creeps.
This girl isn’t hideous, Dummy Jimmy just wants to pretend like he’s such a player that he only gets with models. But you’re not fooling anyone, an average girl like this is about the best he can get and it seldom happens.
Here’s my grading system:
0-25%: deformity, dirty looking
26-50%: minor deformity, looks clean
51-75%: no major imperfection but plain, uninspiring
76-100%: hot and saucy
I reconfirm the initial 65% I gave to this girl. My fiancée is a perfect 100% in my eyes, and judging from her instagram followership, most people would rate her over 80%. The two of us were stalking each other on social media before a common friend got us in touch, and that was the first time I had a cyber crush.
I can’t get with a girl I rate below 50%, but I guess most guys on here get with girls they rate 26-75% and they don’t get a lot of pussy.
Who Cares?
Big Brains Mean Much More. By Itself, IQ Means Little, If Nothing.
It Only Means Anything As Its Relation To Brain Size.
Your Brain Evolved A Plethora Of Skills For Survival Which Can’t Be Measured By An IQ Test.
Your Job, As A Human, Is Sexual Conquest.
Your Brain Evolved A Plethora Of Skills For Survival Which Can’t Be Measured By An IQ Test.
Why not? If you look at the Wechsler IQ scales, they measure a very wide variety of cognitive abilities. And g, the general intelligence factor IQ tests aim to measure, is by definition common to ALL cognitive abilities.
Many Times, High-Scorers On IQ Tests Have Average-Sized, Or Even Small (Einstein) Brains. A ‘Genius’ Can Merely Be Over-Specialized In One Area And Bereft In Others.
The Dramatic Increase In Human Brain Size Was Due To Large-Group Socialization And Language.
Many High-IQ ‘Geniuses’ Are Often Socially Illiterate. Social Skills And Larger Dunbar Numbers Are Most-Associated With Large Brains.
A Tell-Tale Example, Pumpkin, Is Your Favorite, Oprah, With Abnormally-Large Brain. Also, Turgenev The Writer Is Is On File, With An Abnormally Large Brain.
Many Tribal People Have Large Brains And Low-IQs
Anon might be on to something.
Ron Unz has a small head for example. In fact many jews do.
Brain size may be related to memory more than cog processing.
Wrong. Unz has a big head.
SO I spent all night thinking about it and its occurred to me that the reason africa is poor is because the Africans anticipated theyd be colonised and then thats why they didnt bother becoming advanced because it would be robbed anyway by the no good gentile straight white males.
Thats ricardian equivalence.
Philosopher, my point was that because whites were colonial powers in Third World countries, white phenotypes became more prestigious and beautiful to people around the World. I wasn’t suggesting colonialism was the primary reason.
What’s your explanation? People just instinctively know white is better because it is?
they all look alike.
this is my explanation as a white male.
that is, europeans have the greatest variation in coloration. that’s objective.
they also have the greatest variation (variance) in beauty.
they always win the ugly pageant and the beauty pageant.
I never said that phenotype was ‘better’. Just that your rebuttal was something a person who had a piano fall on them would say.
I never said that phenotype was ‘better’
But the point is it’s considered better.
Just that your rebuttal was something a person who had a piano fall on them would say.
Colonizers can influence the colonized? what a crazy idea. I don’t know what I was thinking (eye roll).
Not 60 years afterwards after a virulent nationalist movement under the aegis of a demonically anti white media/academia.
I don’t wake up in my bed and think about how the British make like fish and chips.
#make me like
Jamaican me craayyyzeee.
The reason jamaica is poor is because they anticipate they might be colonised by the gentile straight whites in north america. Thats why they are purposely sabotaging their country and burning down their building and shooting people in anticipation of being subjugated.
Thats called ‘scorched earth’ tactics. The russians were very good about this against Napoleon and Hitler.
Maybe the reason south africa is capitulating is because the lrgacy of colonialism is effecting their radar signals.
yesss!
i learned from Hidden Figures that jamaicans invented radar.
Hidden figures is scientific proof of bigfoot.
afro’s greatest hits.
speaking of women with short hair and little makeup. not anymore. but she was a ko.
*puke*