Commenter JS wrote:
American proles define status with lifestyle only, the more money = the more hedonism = hence the more status. Ivy League Investment bankers party with state college-frat boys. It’s all about the money. Lion is wrong about Proles vs SWPLs.
And about the Ivy League, its graduates don’t care for learning, they want money, no questions asked!
Americans are class unaware. People marry up or marry down, because they want money.
I’ve never found the concept of social class as traditionally defined, particularly useful for describing America, mostly because social class is all about inherited status, old money and sophistication, and America’s greatest heroes are rags to riches success stories and plain spoken people who can relate to the common man. And although America has less economic mobility than other developed countries, Americans like to see themselves as the land of opportunity, and actively reject the idea of a caste system or monarchy.
One of the reasons Hillary lost the election is people don’t want the Clintons or anyone else to become a political dynasty because that goes against everything America likes to think it stands for. One of the reasons Trump won is that despite his wealth, he reflected the populism and vulgarity of the common man.
Also, if you look at America’s most successful demographic (Ashkenazi Jews), they came to the United States with very little wealth, and only achieved their current status within the last several decades.
Thus instead of the idea of social class, I’ve repeatedly argued that what best explains the American hierarchy are three types of power: popularity, intellectual influence, and money. Whoever has the highest Z score on a composite of all three are the “winners” in America. These three types of capital are not mutually exclusive and one type can be exchanged for another type: Giving billions of dollars to charity, as Bill Gates did, decreases his economic capital (money) but increased his political capital (popularity). Giving speeches to Wall Street, as Hillary did, cost her political capital, but increased her wealth.
Popularity: The ability to win hearts
This type of power is exemplified by sitting U.S. presidents who are virtually always the most worshipped man in America, other high profile politicians, and First Ladies. Surprisingly, with the exception of Oprah, and sometimes Ellen and Angelina Jolie, celebrities generally don’t show up that much when Americans are asked (without prompting) to name who they most admire. Also interesting is the fact that blacks are dramatically overrepresented in this type of power, especially after controlling for IQ. This might be because blacks are genetically better at more charismatic occupations like politics, entertainment and sports, as part of an evolved strategy for getting numerous mates (J.P. Rushton argued blacks evolved to have higher birth rates at the expense of survival rates), or it could be because they carry a certain moral authority because of slavery, or perhaps blacks are promoted to more visible positions as a form of tokenism. Likely all three factors play a role.
Interestingly, Jews tend to be quite unexceptional on this type of power after controlling for IQ (Bernie Sanders being a notable exception) either because they lack charisma, anti-Semitism, or because the don’t want to be the public face of power, preferring instead a behind the scenes role.
People who are considered proles also can also do extremely well at this type of power (Sarah Palin and perhaps even Trump, being the most obvious examples).
Intellectual influence: The ability to win minds
This type of power is exemplified by columnists for The New York Times, members of Thinktanks who shape government policy, and professors who write policy books that are read by Senators and Presidents. Ashkenazi Jews are DRAMATICALLY overrepresented in this type of power, even after controlling for IQ. Despite being 2% of America they are 50% of the most influential pundits. By contrast blacks are 13% of America, but only 2% of the most influential pundits. Proles virtually never achieve this type of power.
Money: the ability to win wallets
This type of power is self-explanatory. The richest people wield incredible power because they can buy politicians, media outlets, and Think Tanks. Once again, Ashkenazi Jews are dramatically overrepresented , (36% of the 400 richest Americans despite being 2% of America) and blacks have probably never been more than 0.5% of the Forbes 400, despite being 13% of America. This might be because prehistorically, economic success was all about having the adaptability to acquire enough resources to survive, but according to Rushton’s theory, blacks evolved a strategy where survival rates were sacrificed to increase birth rates. By contrast nerdy guys like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckergberg, who prehistorically would not have got the most mates, evolved because they were so good at surviving that they were the only ones left to mate with.
Of course IQ alone can’t explain the extreme disparity we see in racial wealth; differences in ethnic networking likely also play a part. It could be that blacks, being the World’s oldest phenotype and lineage, are the most genetically diverse, and thus have the least in-group favouritism (look at all the black on black crime). By contrast, Ashkenazi Jews, being an extremely new race, are much more genetically homogenous, allowing more in-group altruism. See ethnic genetic interests.
Pumpkin Person 
or because they don’t want to be the public face of power, preferring instead a behind the scenes role.
People who are considered proles
alsocan also…this is peepee’s first post which is evidence for her being older than 12.
would you rather be chomsky or bruce kovner?
chomsky has < $2m in wealth from what i've read.
the funny thing about trump’s proleness is…
is it that he’s prole, or is it that he’s honest…brutally honest?
trump’s election is…in a strange way…a vindication of tail gunner joe. look it up. from mccarthy to trump…
And even if there were only one Communist in the State Department, that would still be one Communist too many.
People think Trump’s prole because he looks and sounds like a drunk guy at a sports bar.
In one of the Apprentice episode, the contestants had the privilage to have dinner at Trump’s home. It was full of golden decoration which is extremely prole. He seems to have no culture and any feeling for art or literature. Well I can understand that as a rich man he never suffered, and art is a reflection of suffering.
America is such a crude place that I don’t envy anyone who’s rich, influential or whatever. I just don’t. It’s crude, prole and culturally barren. For many immigrants, it’s a safe haven from their 3rd world hellholes. This is relatively speaking, America is a great nation for those who come from destitution. My relatives in Europe would never come here to establish a long term residence.
On Lion’s blog, I said I could never live anywhere else outside of Manhattan within the United States. Manhattan is crude enough, but greater America is sans civilization.
And yes, Manhattan is very Jewish. But I’m not stepping on them. Jews become litigious if you get entangled with them. I don’t. Gentile Peasants of greater America display another form of sociopathy.
PP: Mugabe thinks America has a rigid class system. I say Americans have no class, as in classy or in class distinction. There are many wealthy people in America who are tactless, hedonistic, and no different from those who have less money and exhibit the same bad behavior.
In Manhattan, there are a few country club places, where only the wealthy dines and anyone who doesn’t live in certain address cannot get in, but that’s about it. You can be a guy from the ghetto who just got paid from work, and decides to splurge your entire paycheck on an expensive restaurant, sitting next to millionaires. This only happens in America.
What’s bad about that? Do you really have so much contempt for “lower class” people that you refuse to sit next to them? What you described is the selling point of America.
I have contempt for many Americans across all income levels, because they are parochial.
You don’t think Europeans are parochial? Lol people are ultimately the same the world over. That’s more true now than ever with the Internet and rampant globalization.-
America’s modus opera tells the world, it is the most powerful — the enforcer in the world, and the average American lives in the bubble.
then we agree JS.
the US does have a rigid “class” system in terms of income and wealth, but money doesn’t buy class…especially in america…the so called “episcopacy”, the northeastern wasp establishment, was the closest the US ever came to an aristocracy, and they no longer have any power at all.
america isn’t a country. it’s just a business.
And this is good old Boston,
The home of the bean and the cod,
Where the Lowells talk only to Cabots,
And the Cabots talk only to God.
There’s nothing superior about a fucking Frenchman.
The French have their proles. They’re just invisible to us from this side of the Atlantic. Get real!
PP,
your blog attrack trash is it*
He makes interesting comments. Yes, Europe’s proles are more cultured.
JS,
russian/european proles are more cultured**
I don’t think so… maybe the ”french charm” creates this illusion.
”He makes interesting comments.”
Well if are you who are saying….
😉
Perhaps not of East Euro, but the proles of Western Europe are less prole than American bourgeois.
They are more educated slaves… i understand, =)
White Americans with money and an inkling of class wants to aspire to the Old World, which shunned them in the 1st place.
America is now seeing more Old World Immigrants because
1) the dumber ones enjoy America’s lack of tact, it’s loose, sloppy organization
2) its offers more opportunities to become more degenerate
“lolyer” is…
1. an arrant racist. he hates blacks and quebecers.
2. an arrant classist. he hates poor white people.
yet he spouts the bromides of the jew-stablishment, “liberate yourself from hate.”
i’m starting to think custer should’ve won the battle of little big horn.
the almost unbelievable power of #2 again.
#2 is a #2. or a #jew. if you know what i mean.
Power is about control of information.
Who writes the textbooks, who controls the media, how public NARR is spun, what ideals we strive towards, how history is warped and controlled to expound the new NARR, the new ‘eternal’ enemy in Persia, Muscovy and Samarkand and so on.
That is why, I believe the internet will destroy Power type 2 of Zion, and eventually power type 3 in the longer run, whilst reducing Magic Negro effect in Power 1.
Sailer is correct: Jews have little charisma or testosterone to win the high school dance…so they teamed up with Martin Luther King types to get civil rights. His so called Hi-Lo Tag Team. Accept Sailer doesn’t realise its also Hi-Lo Testosterone the other way. Its a complementary pair.
What structurally induces a fissure in the Sailer strategy will be:
1. Transparent information and weakening of public NARR control.
2. Blacks testosterone levels continuing to rise (80% of black women single mothers now!!!!) causing social havoc and repudiation i.e. much like Huntingtin production’s CAG cycles in every generation causes mental illness, early dementia, Parkinsons….*
3. Whites coming to vote and think racially together.
*Nature is a Markowitz frontier algo…it keeps pushing up IQ and testosterone to the point of diminishing and eventually negative returns in every environment.
there is no evidence that blacks differ in testosterone levels than whites.
On the nature of the ‘prole’
Cause it’s a bittersweet symphony this life
Trying to make ends meet, you’re a slave to the money then you die
I’ll take you down the only road I’ve ever been down
You know the one that takes you to the places where all the veins meet, yeah
No change, I can’t change, I can’t change, I can’t change,
but I’m here in my mold, I am here in my mold
But I’m a million different people from one day to the next
I can’t change my mold, no, no, no, no, no, no, no
aha, wrong link.
Maybe a delete post and edit post function would be great.
”Also, if you look at America’s most successful demographic (Ashkenazi Jews), they came to the United States with very little wealth, and only achieved their current status within the last several decades.”
Source**
Kikes or the western ”europigs”*
PP,
you already wrote about this subject. Do you remember*
Yes, I’ve wrote about it several times
written**
It’s different this time: We came to the real purpose of America.
Americans’ pursuit of money is to achieve specific lifestyles, usually those of the middle class, which other developed countries have in place already.
There is no class in America, except the definition of money, and what you want to do with it. America doesn’t care for Old Money the way Europe perceives it.
There is class-hierarchy in USA and it is defined by money, period.
But every empire have their protected castes.
The idea that USA is not a caste- based society because money can promote social ascension is wrong because what define caste is not money itself but the power and social meaning of it, and in de-humanized/macro-societies as USA, power and social meaning of the powerful classtes are respectively their meaning and their definition:
high social classes — social meaning = power.
You don’t need to have the greatest fortune of all: Bill Gates or other new absurdly billionaires,
You need have the power of the most important social and economic gears. This make you powerful.
You need to be indirectly absurdly rich to have the power.
If you have their hands in the money of others even the big sharks, so you can be treated yourself as a ”God” of this mundane and grotesque inhuman world, aka, always-idiocracy.
The idea that USA promoted the dream of common people is partially right, not because their own exceptionality but because the lack of progressive social ascension in the old world.
Americans are very hedonistic, so hedonism/consumerism is what Americans happy. Most only care about money. Many upper class in America act like trash.
Sometimes it’s not because the other lack something you have, partially developed, that you will be considerably better than the first.
Also there is a neutral/ideal parameter to be considered. This perfect parameter make most of human achievements in the social sphere pale and coarse.
USA was very similar with Russia this days, even in the 20’s, 30’s, very socially inequal society.
Europe has been very little social ascension in the way most people think ”social ascension” must be, partially because the Bourgeois victory over royalty, has been a long-term, a long process and the individual capacity to surpass all of social layers in life is more exception than the rule even in ascendent societies, and many of this social ascension over generations of the same families has been promoted by government and not exactly or only by greedy individuals.
I ask why Southern Euros are happier than Americans, despite having less money for petty pleasures.
It’s culture.
Americans might claim they have more stuff, more stimulation in their life, making them more dynamic. But America’s dynamic environment, most do not take the advantage.
They are deceived by their material things. They really believe material things = happiness.
Americans including the academics at the Ivory Towers are either so stupid or willfully ignoring the fact that eliminating social equities in America is with a well rounded education, not with more money or jobs. Many moneyed Americans act like low class garbage people.
Again **** Americans only care about money. American professors only care about their cushy jobs, because they fear more competition that takes away their positions, and their knowledge are meaningless to society for all the reasons above.
* social inequities
Off topic
Asexual reproduction or self-sexual reproduction*
Non-heterossexuality ”can be” the manifestion of the vestigial self-sexual reproductive impulses (aka, ”asexual”) among sexual species because instead the sexual projection to their ”missing-half” resulting in sexual reproductive impulses, they/we tend to self-project sexual pleasure and as a result the desire to the same-sex/same-self.
In topic, but not related to the money discussion.
PP says Ashkenazim have more in-group altruism, when compared to blacks, because they are a more recent group with less genetic variance. This becomes a false fact, when you take East Asians into consideration.
PP says Ashkenazim have more in-group altruism, when compared to blacks, because they are a more recent group with less genetic variance. This becomes a false fact, when you take East Asians into consideration.
How so?
East Asians have less genetic variance than Ashkenazim. By far, they are less altruistic (at least they appear to be) than Jews and have less in group cooperation. Jews are successful in America, because of these reasons. Anyone who believes the fact that America is meritocratic and equal is of course foolish to think so. The country always operated on tribal and genetic interests, and it seems to regress into more of it, given our recent politics.
East Asians have less genetic variance than Ashkenazim
Mongoloids probably have less genetic variance than Caucasoids, but Ashkenazem are an extremely new form of Caucasoid so they might be newer than any race of Mongoloid
That might be true, yet the cultures of all Caucasoids from the brown types to the Ashkenazim emphasize charitable/atruistic causes, which are sorely lacking among the Mongoloids. And Mongoloids are quite recent in existence. Some people classified Mongoloids not as a race, but a hodge podge of genetic material found in Africa and Europe, which are consistent among their members.
The bottom line: Jews are successful, because of their tribal nature. The WASP elites in America did not suddenly handed a silver platter to them and said you guys can have it. Now Jews play the same game, of maintaining the status quo.
Their alliance with White gentiles is a matter of convenience and status promotion. Jews used to ally with blacks and became successful from it. Now they cast black people aside, because blacks are of no use to them and ally with White gentiles for their next agenda.
One thing that separates Jews from White gentiles is their ability to maintain an “open mind” of associating with different people to achieve their agendas. Hence, Jews are never conservative, but radical.
Also the term “gentile”, I believe hearing from Jews, basically signifies non-Jewish Whites in a negative way of being “genteel” or nice. It has less significance when defining black and Asian people.
Wow.
That etymology of ‘gentile’ would explain a lot.
Link?
I kept asserting that whites are the nice guys. And you wouldn’t accept it.
I though “nice” was a symptom of autism (child-like mind)
It is, whites and east asians are the most autistic races.
There are probably more autistic whites/asians than there are blacks in total working in STEM fields.
The difference between Whites and Asians from the Machiavellian quote of Orson Welles:
“…in 30 years of warfare, terror and bloodshed under the Borgias, Italy produced Michaelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance, while in Switzerland 500 years of brotherly love and peace only produced the cuckoo clock”.
Maybe a coincidence**
This must be better analysed. Maybe swiss people are better to produce better societies than to produce ”better’ individuals*
And a ”entire story” of warfare, ”Africa” produced……
….
As always, IQ and behavioral profile are needed to be taken into consideration. Aggressive people who are also smart, move and shake society, while passive and smart people do not, like comparing Southern Euros and East Asians. Aristotle vs Confucius is a good analogy.
I say Southern Euro region is still a model for the West:
Nordic, Anglos and Continental Euros are still indebted to Southern Europeans. They’ve learned enough about Ancient Greece and Rome. Italian Renaissance — they are still learning.
But one thing they have not really learned: The multiculturalism history of Spain — a good model to take a lesson for today’s world.
Northern Euros and Anglos are socially inferior!!!
You are northern european hater… no doubt.
Tell me what northern europeans ”are” good** in nothing*
Move society…
many times to the worst directions.
Why not
– be ”collectively” friendly
and
– creative in the same time*
”But one thing they have not really learned: The multiculturalism history of Spain — a good model to take a lesson for today’s world.”
JS,
no doubt you internalize this Story in your head and none will be capable to change your thoughts…
why**
stupidity tend to be extremely difficult to take off the head.
Again and my last again about this subject and the next i will less polite with you:
”Spain” Did not have a multiculturalism project. It was not because ” Spain ” was superior to other countries that ‘she’ was well successfull in producing a multicultural society. It was precisely because of their weaknesses that Spain was invaded and dominated for centuries by foreign peoples and then when they were expelled, many Spaniards had already mingled, seems, with these foreigners. Spain, before the Muslim invasion, was mono-cultural, or with small cultural differences between its regions. During the Moorish invasion, Spain was bi-cultural, part invaded versus the uninvaded and un-dominated part. With the reconquista Spain returned to being like any other modern European country, mono-cultural, with some idiotic cultural variations like the ” torada ” in Catalonia and some original and very good cultural manifestations like the gypsy flamenco in Andalusia. The gypsies went to Spain what blacks have been to the US, two socially dysfunctional peoples with endemic manifestation of musical talents, as well as with evolutionary veins of cicadas.
Santo mi hermano — Of course historical experiences are applied in today’s world.
Vale, we need to speak of today:
Spain has been far more successful in integrating Muslims, and other minorities. It’s the only Euro country with a good track record. Of course, this talent comes from its history which has provided the experience.
Gypsies in Andalusia are now essentially Spanish, almost fully assimilated. They are also doing better economically, because the gov’t has allow them to play flamenco and other musical festivals without any intervention, where they make a lot of money from the tourists and they keep for themselves. Can minorities in Anglo countries really make a lot of money from their inherent talents in their own ghetto neighborhoods? Anglo nations put a stigma on poor people and segregate them without any dignity.
The Muslim immigrants in Spain are also more integrated than the rest of Europe, because Spanish gov’t insist Muslims broker a deal with Spanish society — you live here, you must find a way to make peace with your Spanish neighbors. Anglo Society do nothing of this sort, they just allow them to come in and tell them to do whatever they want and then the conflicts occur…the same with Muslims in Northern Euro and France.
Also, Santo — Spanish Christians in the Middle Ages — many knew Arabic from associating with Muslim neighbors.
How do you think Anglo Joo, Christian intellectuals learn Arabic in the Middle Ages? They traveled to Spain to learn from Spanish Christians or the Spanish Christians would visit Oxford University to teach them.
I quit.
I told you Northern Euro and Anglos are socially inferior compared to Southern Euros…so what’s the issue? They are less socialized than Southern Euros — they’re older, more socialized, have greater legacy of glory, less prone to degenerate problems like drug and alcohol addiction….of course, Northerners created the concept of modern urbanization as we know it. But this does not make them better.
Ancient romans and greeks wasn’t the same than italians and greek today, period.
EVEN they share the same genetic legacy, is not the same for culture…, period.
So a modern greek CAN’T take the ancient greek achievements as if was their own.
Even a individual classical greek would can’t take the Aristoteles individuals achievements as if was their own.
”legacy of glory” = Roman Empire**
that you agree that it’s similar with American Empire*
Many reasonable people say bad things about southern europe, of course, there are good things too, but the bad is there and tend to be quite bad to their own way…
Again, tell me, northern europeans are subhumans** they are dumber in everything*
”Socially inferior”
You can’t compare the infected spider behavior with the ”healthy” spider…
even we know Southern Europe is going to the same hole, with less immigrants, but it’s not because they are superior than northern europeans, otherwise, because most people want to live in BETTER places as Sweden and France.
You are all the time despising the multiple perspectives this subject requires.
Standard living = Northern Europe trump Southern, obvious, any geography book tell you…
Quality of life**
Maybe Southern Europe trump Northern Europe…
… because southern europeans, on avg, creates a superior social environment**
Not so, because they are less cognitively smart than northern ones, their countries or regions has been less industrialized, less urbanized, less modernized…
and less urbanized environments seems less toxic than urbanized ones*
but the leftist virus seems quite spread among southern european youths.
I’m showing a chain of inter-conected facts and you are showing your personal and mono-narrative distorting the historical, social, cultural, moral and economic facts about this subject.
Qualitative/quantitative research on southern euro countries are not accurate to say the least, because many researchers are from the Anglosphere/Northern nations and cannot get a precise picture when they study these groups, who have a culture of insularity, and are less concerned with explicit information or sharing it. But Southern Euros are smart enough to function properly than anyone south of them.
Northern Euros are socially inferior, because they cannot integrate other people successfully seen with their immigrants, and they are also too individualistic and not collectivist enough with poor familial structure, which is needed for survival — also socially inferior and more importantly– because they are prone to hedonism at a greater frequency with drugs and alcohol, which is why their societies are now degenerating faster and why all these immigrants are cleaning up after their mess. Wealth and industrialization are not good predictors as to why these countries are dying because of the immigration gone wrong. Northern Euros have a weaker familial structure and collectivist mentality, hence why outsiders come into their countries to do things for them, instead they should be doing for themselves.
You guys shit on America all the time but the truth is every society has its “losers”. Some people who don’t thrive in one society move to another that suits them more. No environment will work for 100% of the people. You have to find what works for you and go there.
That’s correct. I see America as a cultural desert with a main emphasis of a consumerist society. I’m not interested in the money part. And now it will get worse for most Americans…a lack of culture, a lack of intellectual capacity and a lack of curiosity of the world, most important…many lack social capital due to the lack of the other things. I can live in Madrid, because I have friends there.
* it is believed that many Americans are now sweating in the cold, after going cold turkey, because you can only consume up to a certain amount. To make matters worse, many have no money, after spending so much on junk. They are stuck in their boring country, with nothing else. America is 100% consumerist and nothing else. This ideology is falling apart and Americans are now confused and afraid.
I have repulse to the term ”America”, America is a continent, USA sound better… None call Russia, ”Europe”, none call China, ”Asia”.
None need to say shit about USA, it’s just the reality. But differently than JS who are quite biased about this country i know recognize both their weaknesses and their qualities, but generally their weaknesses surpass their qualities.
Real losers have great fear to be treated like that, real ”winners” don’t give a schutzz…
If we live in ancient projected matrix, a bizarre version of the reality, with tons of true and lies, so the real winners don’t waste your time with fakeries.
We are in the social game, those who understand that it IS a game, can do whatever they want, if they want. If i want i could become very popular, i know what is necessary to do and i have talent enough to do it, but i can’t. Maybe i try it in the future, but by now, real reality via aesthetic consciousness is more beautiful, deep and valuable than almost of the falkeries human complex societies are made.
the first part is correct. the last part is incorrect. all other developed countries have much more restrictive immigration than the US. by the time one knows what would have worked for him it may be too late. when one knows what will work for him it may be too expensive.
“Deal with it!” has himself had to incur $100k in debt to get off the res. what would he have done if he’d finished at the bottom of his class.
every society has “losers”, but a society can be judged by how well off those who are worst off are. any amount of inequality can be justified if it also helps those who are worst off. this is sometimes called “the veil of ignorance”.
If you’re smart enough, you’ll figure out a way. I know a guy who’s doing his Masters in Germany. He hated Canada and had enough sense to GTFO..
You’re a retard who faints at the very idea of work. You’ll lose EVERYWHERE.
My sentiments as well.
right i’m a…
lazy retarded bitter prole racist white trash piece of shit who lives in a trailer and sports a mullet…
yet i should…
“liberate myself from hatred”.
the above exemplifies the problem…
even america’s smarter frostbacks are stupid.
doing his Masters in Germany…
the tuition is free, but the room and board aren’t…how’d he pay for it? and your friend is young enough…i assume…once you’ve been stymied in a top AMERICAN organic chem PhD “program”…what’re you supposed to do? you’re too old.
the US is an open air prison.
the schizosopher is agreeing with whom?
and talk about stress…
moving to a foreign country…
having to learn the language…
but you’ll always have an accent…
it’s almost like suicide.
The gamma is an intelligent man with a feminine brain.
It refuses pain.
It lies to itself continually.
If you are what your test scores and claims infer you are…there should be no reason one should be in a trailer…
If you have a well off family with abilities you claim they have…
You shouldn’t be in a trailer….
Unless that is what one genuinely wants to do.
But the rage shows, that is not what one’s ideal station in life is…
Ergo, these bromides about ‘class’ and the once upon a time in america land fairy tales about social constructionism of institutional class racism against Mugamma are doolittle danke schons.
is english you’re native language?
schizosopher is a paki? 99% yes!
i have never lived in a trailer. i have never had a mullet.
i have no tattoos and no “piercings”.
should i move to pakistan? would they even let me in?
for all the opportunity?
opportunity to do what?
to have 100 children by 100 different mothers?
gamma = “the philosopher”
at the end…i’d be no worse…you’d be dead.
men idolize what they don’t have…
and claim it as their own.
for the gay jew-loving sailor…on testosterone…
In reality, large, representative US samples show minimal or no black-white differences in T. Using NHANES III data, Rohrmann et al. find elevated estrogen but not testosterone in black males.
it is also worthy of note that despite the gay white male stereotype…white men are the LEAST likely to be homosexual. look it up.
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2009/10/can-racial-differences-in-circulating.html
he’s got a beautiful body man…he’s an all the way big dude!
the truth about “the philosopher”…he’s strongly attracted to back men…because they’re “jungle”…he’s just as turned on by malaysians…
look it up
I like that blogger, but I think he just wants whites to be the best at everything and is in denial of the sexual superiority of blacks.
According to Rushton:
One study of matched groups of 50 black and 50 white male college students in California found that testosterone levels were 19 percent higher in blacks than in whites (Ross, Bernstein, Judd, Hanisch, Pike, & Henderson, 1986). A 3 percent difference favoring blacks has been found among an older group of 3,654 white and 525 black U.S. male Vietnam era military veterans (Ellis & Nyborg, 1992).
The incidence of cancer of the prostate provides indirect evidence. Numerous medical surveys show that Oriental populations experience less than half the U.S. incidence whereas U.S. blacks have a much higher lifetime risk than U.S. whites (Hixson, 1992; Polednak, 1989).
The Philasterbator doesn’t know the first thing about testosterone.. His schizo brain can’t follow a straight line. It’s all based on “feels” for him.
and let’s do female external genitalia too…it’s never talked about…but it’s an issue too…for men…that’s right girls…we care about “size” too.
an interesting side effect of “complete androgen insensitivity syndrome”, the XY female phenomenon, is something called “vaginal hypoplasia”…
that is…the only reason why women have external genitalia is the result of male hormones…
maybe i’m just in the closet…but….
i don’t want a slit…just like i don’t want a “teeny weeny”.
i want her to have something “down there”…but not so much that it’s like an east german…if you know what i mean.
Muguber doesn’t understand the difference between Free Test Levels and Androgen Receptivity…
Some studies even have east asians at similar FT levels as other races….
For SHAME.
As for Pakistani…wrong. So far we’ve ruled out British, Iranian, black, jew and sephardic jew. Only another ~8CH~30 permutations to go boyz.
“Is english you’re native language”
Probably not yours.
egyptian?
it’s coming to me now through the ether…
your first name is farooq, and you come from an effendi family.
Rushton is wrong. That Ross study is one study, here is a meta analysis showing that testosterone is 2.5 to 4.9 percent higher in blacks than Whites.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24648111
I would assume that the higher rates of prostate cancer come from the tight side of the curve.
My guess is North African or Mulatto
The Schizolosopher is definitely non-white!
Btw I think peepee is Southeast Asian, as in Filipino, Thai, etc. Why? Because she seems quite objective when it comes to other groups like South Asians, whites, Jews, blacks, etc. However, she fawns over East Asians. So wouldn’t it make more sense that she’s East Asian? NO! Her poor grades in school, emotional troubles, and prole interests like Oprah and horror invite the inference that she likely grew up in a lower middle class family. That doesn’t mean she can’t be East Asian but makes it less likely. Also, she has never talked about Southeast Asians. Why? Because she doesn’t want to reveal herself! Of course!
Will peepee post this?
there are no se asian lesbians though. just like there are no first nations lawyers!
another possibility. the putin obsession + nationalism + marxism + “i can make any woman attracted to me” + my father was a “soldier” = the philosopher was born in the soviet union, and his putin thing is not a sign of insanity but of real terror instilled in him when he was very young.
he may look like georgy malenkov (georgy on the left, molotov on the right, stalin in the middle):
i spoke too soon.
http://www.trbimg.com/img-53257ac4/turbine/bal-the-10-best-lawyers-in-tv-and-film-2011053-010-altthumbnail
He intimated that he’s mulatto or something along those lines in a recent post. Once in a post, out of the blue, he mentioned Iranians in a positive light. So, I was almost sure he’s Iranians and Armenians but he denies it. I still think he’s of MENA extraction. If not, he could be almost anything else. His testosterone indicates low testosterone and he’s basically admitted that he’s not “smooth” but it’s always implied. He’s moral in the sense that even his lies are often tempered by elements of truth spread randomly. He’s a good guy!
His testosterone obsession indicates low testosterone**
i know who you are too “Deal with it!”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenna_Talackova
that must be hard to deal with.
random johnny depp photo? He is also of 3/2048 African descent.
I’ve debunked the mullatto meme a while back 4 comment threads in a row. Short of launching into n word rants, I don’t see how you could infer an affinity to magic negroes in my comments. You could make a better argument I was an irked Saffer white who left after apartheid came down to go to London, as many of the Saffers I met have.
As for testosterone, much the same way nerds would be interested in IQ or bodybuilders obsess about it. That is not to say I am not a nerd. And that is not to say I have the testosterone of an east asian nun.
”Rushton is wrong. That Ross study is one study, here is a meta analysis showing that testosterone is 2.5 to 4.9 percent higher in blacks than Whites.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24648111
I would assume that the higher rates of prostate cancer come from the tight side of the curve.”
Exactly
”free testosterone levels were significantly higher in black than in white men”
I have avg total testosterone and lower free testosterone.
”Eggalitards” are wrong again…
He is not ”smart enough” to improve their NATIVE (??) english!!
Im the only filipino here. I intend to keep it that way lmao
Artificial Intelligence is the future.
(made a new video on my blog)
Elon Musk and NVIDIA CEO Jen Hsun Huang
I truly enjoy your blog..there is still no way to add replies ..don’t you want that? using your formula, if the whole Universe was a quantum Computer then it’s IQ would be 1456..or in other word God’s IQ is 1456…or God shows 1456 points of its IQ in this Universe
W and cheney both have roots in 17th c america…but they were puppets of #2.
as i’ve said before…guys like W and cheney should have the most power in the US…if they’re independent thinkers aware of their now rare level of “american-ness”…but they’re just too stupid.
“nation of immigrants” is a contradiction in terms. the people whose ancestors were here first should have certain “privileges”, injuns included. they used to have them. W and cheney are examples.
in retrospect George H W Bush was the best of the last 5 presidents.
the last gasp of the wasp establishment.
I would say Obama hands down. But each to his own.
Georgie Senior had a kiddy problem:
http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_sex_coverup/franklin.htm
you’re not only “schizo” you’re CREDULOUS!
there used to be two types of republicans…maybe not anymore…
1. the republican who really believed that lower taxes, less government was good…for the poorest of the poor. (my type of republican!)
2. the republican who didn’t believe anything except…rich people good…poor people bad.
of course in the uk and canada “republican” means someone who wants to guillotine the queen.
He really was a paedo. You can tell just on physiognomy. Paedos look a certain way. Dropped earlobes, facial asymmetry…
https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/minor-physical-anomalies-prenatal-pedophilia
The incidental evidence in those news stories makes it obvious.
Paedophilia is massive thing at elite levels.
Look at epstein’s black book or the Hollywood child sex scandals.
Massive fetish.
Philosopher,
many people who have organic disorders have assymetrical faces, period.
Anglo America should not have existed in the 1st place. Or what Mugabe have said, the New World is just ungovernable.
But but…in reality degenerate Anglos opened the barbarian floodgates for a dime. Spain ruined her colonies and left them for good. America implodes with its founders.
santa claus is right about “barbarians”. “barbarian” originally referred to non-greeks but then came to mean “non-roman”.
although what is now england was part of the roman empire…as soon as the romans left, the angles, saxons, jutes, and frisians conquered england…and these four tribes were all from places which rome never conquered.
that is, had it not been for the conquest…the english would be speaking a romance language today…just like the french and spanish. even the vikings who conquered england again in 1066 had stopped speaking old norse…they spoke french.
england is to europe what america is to the world. the ideal of the “english gentleman” was an “over-compensation” for england’s innate prole-ness.
A man who has not been in Italy, is always conscious of an inferiority, from his not having seen what it is expected a man should see.
Yes, yes, my lord, but it’s more of the effeminate Protestantism that binds the limey gamma to his inferiority.
Englishmen are proles, mainly because they have a tradition of being sedentary manual laborers without any sophistication. The Italians became sedentary and skilled artisans by contrast.
Continental Euros were by nature more nomadic, free spirited and friendlier…at least longer, when it came to Spain…Spaniards are the most free spirited of the Continental Euros.
What constitutes appropriate ‘class’ behaviour then JS?
Reading the classics, enjoying red wine with dinner, talking about geopolitics in the study?, a taste in aesthetic? A fascination with other cultures?…#stuffintellectualwhitemenlike
Many scientists, comp programmers, and engineers are the only upwardly mobile way to jump bottom to mid/upper quintiles.
Most of these people whack off to anime, read comic books, dress in hawaii shorts and hoodies and have the palette sophistication of a grade school down syndrome child.
Or the other upwardly group – aa hires….aha, certainly not white gentile behaviours and tastes. Mr talented mulatto is going to be flashin de mixtapes and playing de basketballs and talking institutional racism till the sun goes de down.
Or the grubby striver feminists laying down on their way up – vacuous, artificial, bandwagon babes.
So perhaps you’re right…america misses its christian heritage which ironed out at least a distinct middle class set of behaviours and norms.
America’s Ivory Tower is no different from its Main St residents, except they need to distinguish themselves from the mere mortals by being well read and holding an advanced degree. They hate Wall St..BUT the Ivory Tower is all about money, status striving and materialism within the confines of the college campus. It’s the Wall St of higher education.
Class in America is synonymous with the income brackets that the IRS sets to extort its taxpayers.
If you have a physical allergy to working.. you deserve to lose. If on top of that, you also have a shitty personality, then you will lose in every environment, period. That’s Mugabe.
I watched this many many years ago. This was how I discovered Bernays piece in the puzzle. Probably one of the most important parts to unravelling the Illusion.
‘Rac-ism’, Martin Trojan Horse King, Blank Slate, Skinner’s Operant Conditioning, Teddy Bear Anchoring, HBD, SP-A Spectrum, Testosterone Hierarchy, Our Pravda (Unz), Allen Dulles/Beria and the Mythology of Modern History came in the years since. Been a ride. The final frontier is trying to figure out what replaces the interloper, Zion….perhaps we can live symbiotically with Zion….but Zion is too emboldened….The Catholic Church took 350 years to destroy after Galileo…Due to fkng Teddy Bear Anchoring alone.
“or because the don’t want to be the public face of power, preferring instead a behind the scenes role.”
Lol. You answered your own question. “Behind the scenes role” because they don’t get blamed, the fallgoys do.
“lolyer” also said, “east asians are evil.”
along with, “liberate yourself from hate.”
i guess i’m not “subtle” enough to understand why this isn’t a contradiction.
Chocolatti,
you to do the same contradictions… 😉
amen!!!
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
”Paris have crime, got it”
Leftoids are hypnotizable people who were recruited to hate white people via indoctrination or nurture on ignorance… they are the outer party, any similarity is not by mere coincidence.
But seems most people can be ”hypnotizable” if they were promoted as the new elite or new hegemonic narrative, well, ”power corrupt majority of people”.
The sensation to have macro-control about others is irresistible for many.
The Goldstein is not Trump, is the white man itself.
Narrative stablishment most part of the time use ”different” words to talk about the reality in the current ”west”…
and…
most of ”conservatives” accept it and start to use the chosen words avoiding real discussions about real things, as for example, instead ”conservatives versus liberals”, ”whites versus jews” or versus blacks, but not… why**
one of the reasons is that conservatives itself look for themselves as conservatives first and whites second or third-ly.
Of course None of this would have been possible if
whites, on avg, wasn’t so DES-UNITE
intellectually and morally stupid…
The ”modern” world is basically a combination of many ”dystopian scenarios” by some romances…
1984
inner or deeper party,
outer party, the useful idiots and asshole opportunistics,
”and” the proles,
of course, there is a outlier class, the contextual opposition (conservatives or gently known ”conservs”) and the universal opposition (many them who are the wisest of human boings)
Brave New World with drug popularity (somma) and sexual promiscuity, also within outer party… and the genetic engineering coming…
Most hbds think with the genetic engineering THAT ”western elite”, or any other dumb elites, all the problems in the world will be solved
OR
the human-beast problems in the world will reach new level of sofistication and stupidity…
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-one-lifespan/201211/openness-experience-and-intellectual-ability
Sorry, a mistake, hihihihi
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.755560
PP’s favorite Canadian – Rob Ford together with President Elect Trump, before he was president. Too bad he’s dead not to see him elected:
2 Anglo Proles and now you know why Anglo Proles are rancid!!!
Pumpkinperson, why do you assume a Gaussian distribution when most psychometrician say the IQ distribution is log normal. So that 164 IQ (sd15) is not 1 in 100 000 but more like 1 in 15 000 IQ.
It s also a pitty that scholastic tests aren’t build to better correlate with IQ. Il would be better if students wouldn’t have to spend two years of hard work to try to master the test tricks.
Pumpkinperson, why do you assume a Gaussian distribution when most psychometrician say the IQ distribution is log normal. So that 164 IQ (sd15) is not 1 in 100 000 but more like 1 in 15 000 IQ.
Childhood ratio IQs might be log-normal because of sudden cognitive growth spurts, but we don’t know if cognitive abilities in adults are log-normal, and modern IQ tests are FORCED to fit a normal curve.
I understand that IQ don’t have to be gaussian ny construction, when you have determined the two first sd which are gaussian (1 in 6 and 1 in 40) , you can keep the same absolute number is the raw score sd to distribute IQ based on this score, and generally, the 3 sd is not 1 in 750 but 1 in 500 and the 4 sd (160IQ) is more 1 in 5000-10000 instead of 1 in 35 000.
Dont hesitate to correct me please if i misunderstand something.
I understand that IQ don’t have to be gaussian ny construction, when you have determined the two first sd which are gaussian (1 in 6 and 1 in 40) , you can keep the same absolute number is the raw score sd to distribute IQ based on this score, and generally, the 3 sd is not 1 in 750 but 1 in 500 and the 4 sd (160IQ) is more 1 in 5000-10000 instead of 1 in 35 000.
Many IQ tests do not have items that are all evenly spaced in difficulty for the full range of items so they are ordinal scales, not true interval scales, let alone true ratio scales. Only if the latter two are used can you observe if the distribution is Gaussian.