In light of the fact that the most prolific and horrific commenter on this blog (Mugabe, aka chocolate babies)claims to have scored 800 on all three sections of the old GRE, I wanted to explore this test further. Some people believe him; others are very skeptical. Some ask why I tolerate him at all. The reason is I’m a horror fan, and thus have high tolerance for freakish behavior. The other reason is I LOVE HIS AVATAR!
It’s hilariously ironic to have someone with the avatar of a black man expressing such aggressively alt-right opinions, and even though there’s the stereotype of blacks being less smart, the particular black avatar he chose looks fiercely intelligent, and I’ve finally figured out why. It’s because it looks like a black Ben Stein, who is rumoured to have a freakishly high IQ.
Enough about Mugabe. Let’s talk about the GRE.
The GRE and the SSS (the super self-selected)
During the late 20th century, Americans who took the SAT, were self-selected to have an above average IQ (108; U.S. norms), but those who were academically ambitious and confident enough to take both the SAT, and then several years later, the GRE, appear to have been far more self-selected for IQ than I could have ever imagined. Indeed based on their verbal SAT distribution (see image below), they had a mean IQ of 120 and an SD of 14, compared to the general U.S. distribution with a mean of 100 and an SD of 15. I will refer to this group as the super self-selected (SSS).
Perfect verbal score on old GRE = IQ 158 (U.S. norms); IQ 157 (U.S. white norms)
Now among the SSS, the GRE verbal (circa 1990) had a mean and SD of 510.1 and 107.7 respectively (see image above), so assuming a normal curve, only one in 261 of these highly self-selected people would score a perfect 800 (a Z score of 2.69 with respect to the SSS). But because the SSS has a mean IQ of 120 and an SD of 14, a Z score of 2.69 equates to an IQ of 2.69(14) + 120 = 158 (U.S. norms)
Perfect verbal score AND perfect quantitative score on old GRE = IQ 162 (U.S. norms); IQ 161 (U.S. white norms)
Now of those one in 261 SSS who scored 800 on the GRE Verbal (Z = 2.69), how many would score 800 again on the GRE Quantitative? Well, given a 0.56 correlation between GRE V and GRE Q in this population, the expected Q score of someone with a Z score of 2.69 on V, would of course be 0.56(2.69) = 1.51 (standard error = 0.83).
Given that the GRE Q has a mean and SD of 573.4 and 125.6 respectively in this population, a score of 800 has a Z score of 1.8, which is 0.35 standard errors higher than the expected Q score of an 800 V, which means that only one in 2.71 of them should repeat their 800 on the Q section. Since scoring 800 on V is already a one in 261 performance (in the SSS), getting another 800 on Q becomes a one in 261(2.71) = 707 performance.
Assuming a normal curve, one in 707 is an incredible three standard deviations above average, but because the SSS has a mean IQ of 120 and an SD of 14, it equates to an IQ of 3(14) + 120 = 162 (U.S. norms)
Perfect score on ALL THREE SECTIONS of the old GRE = IQ 164 (U.S. norms); IQ 165 (U.S. white norms)
Now of the one in 707 SSS who scored 800 on both GRE V and GRE Q, how many did it yet again on the analytical section? Given that the correlation, in the SSS, between GRE V and GRE A is 0.65, and the correlation between GRE Q and GRE A is 0.73, and the correlation between GRE V and GRE Q is 0.56, the following multiple regression equation can be derived:
Expected Z on GRE A = 0.53(Z on GRE Q) + 0.35(Z on GRE V)
Applying this formula to someone with a perfect V (Z = 2.69) and a perfect Q (Z = 1.8), gives:
Expected Z on GRE A = 0.53(1.8) + 0.35(2.69)
Expected Z on GRE A = 0.954 + 0.942
Expected Z on GRE A = 1.9 (standard error = 0.62)
Now in the SSS, the GRE A has a mean of 579.7 and an SD of 117.6, so a score of 800 has a Z score of 1.87, which is 0.05 Standard errors below the expected score of someone who scored 800 on V and Q. What this means is that of the one in 707 SSS who scored perfect on BOTH V and Q, one in 1.9 would also score perfect on A.
Thus, those who achieve the perfect trifecta have a rarity of one in 707(1.9) = 1,343, within an already highly filtered group. In a normal curve, one in 1,343 is 3.17 standard deviations above the mean, but because the SSS has a mean IQ of 120 and SD of 14, it equates to:
IQ = 3.17(14) + 120
IQ = 44 + 120
IQ = 164 (U.S. norms)
In theory, if all American young adults in the late 20th century had taken the GRE, only about one in 100,000 should have scored perfect on all three sections, and only about one in 136,000 white American young adults should have done so.
Expelled: No intelligence allowed was a horrible movie. If the cell is a machine then humans are machines. And if a God made us we are just an experiment like rats in a cage (like the nazi scene in the movie). There can be no afterlife because machines have no souls. Complete bullshit.
Buddhism explains things much better because the soul is just the interference pattern of our medium. We are not the medium itself. If we were the medium itself that would be materialism, an ectoplasmic ghost. When we die we are not the atoms that float away. Our interference pattern just relocates. On the internet, if a router is full the information goes around it. That is what the soul is.
Humans become intelligent because we learn how the world works through experimentation. If God experimented to make the first cell they at best that god would be pantheistic. Because how could God move atoms into what a cell is without fingers? And if God has fingers, he could have prevented the holocaust but did not. Deism is as cruel as evolution without God. Ben Stein is intelligent but not smart.
the avatar looks smart because of glasses and suit 🙂
and also pressed lips with forward chin.
I don’t get it if Magic Negroes really have magical powers, why don’t they use their powers to disinvent racism.
As we all know racism was invented because it has no rational basis.
……
……
Yeah thats right.
NO.
It is YOU WHO IS LYING!!!!
correlation table headers are shifted. fyi…
Yes it’s a poorly formatted table. I didn’t create it.
To be fair, there’s no contradiction between believing that black people are on average less intelligent than white people, and believing that some black people are “fiercely intelligent.” Gobineau, whose theories on race are ancestral to those of the segregationist and the Nazis, and Galton, who pioneered the measuring tradition continued by Jensen, Lynn, Rushton, etc., both were quite explicit in arguing that though the average IQ of black people was lower, three were some highly intelligent black people, though people of such high intelligence were fewer in the black population than in the white population.
Anyone have a problem with video game addiction? I beat that 6 years ago but I’m so bored between contracts now I have a dire need to download the new AOE II expansion.
It looks fooking great – new civs, revamped graphics, new tech tree and so on.
Jesus, last time I played that was when I still had a dial up modem and a fookin cable line that gave out whenever someone called the house or someone tripped over the wire. URGHH!!!!
I remember I dreamed I was still playing the mother hucking games months after I crushed it.
Such creations of man!
Lawdy, how easy it is to be an addict to something these days.
There is no doubt I learned much of my historical knowledge from AOE.
Even the classics in AOE 1. Gotta love those double entry bookkeeping phoenicians.
Video Games CV
– Virtually unbeatable in Pro Evo 4
– Beat Sephiroth in Kingdom Hearts II
– Various World Records in Colin McRae Dirt
– 100% completion of Oblivion sans vampire quest glitch
– Completed over 300 odd games
I think some of the hardest games I’ve played were the later Syphon Filter series, that Ninja Raiden one for PS3 and those Medal of Honour bonus levels with the Return to Wolfenstein element. Very tough nuts. The older games were generally tougher on average…things like Jungle Strike on Sega or that bloody Donkey Kong game (not the one you guys know…the one below) but were tricky in purpose, not due to glitches or bad balance which is another category I’m leaving out
Do Do Do, Do DO DO Do, do do do.
I think they discontinued the Strike series. They were probably my favourite early games.
One of my favourite maps. 1 very large advancing army.
3 militia armies to post at whatever points in the map you want. And you’re the general and can intervene directly whenever you can.
Just a fooking blast that mission was. And the celebration radio/video messages of each battle really dragged you into it.
Get Civ VI. When I get some time I’m DLing it.
One does not simply get addicted to video games.
I have civrev for PS3, it’s simplistic but fun. Skyrim>oblivion…that’s right I said it, come at me bro! Ninja gaiden was a bitch, medal of honor rising sun was my shit. Play some dark souls then you’ll know if you are truly an alphamale.
This mission is a pain in the fucking head.
Rising Sun was solid. My fave is Medal of Honor: Frontline. Great game.
Civ V was solid. I sunk like 120 hours into it in 2 years. Going to get Civ VI during my work and school vacation.
Waiting on FF XV next week. Can’t wait.
I loved MOH Pacific Assault in the Jungle.
You can direct AI team members in that one. And u got a medic. Its great.
And MOH Airborne.
Rising Sun and Frontline I played as well. I think frontline was the D Day one. Yeah that was the bomb. I remember a North African one too.
Never played the CIV series….
This little gem was I think the first proper RTS
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/dune/images/1/12/Big-a4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120613113336
There is no save function midgame on PS 1 so I had to leave the tv on for hours if I was going out.
Lawdy Lawdy, have mercy!
Is it getting hot in here, or is it just me?
“This mission is a pain in the fucking head.”
I loved that game, the german voiceovers were entertaining
“Rising Sun was solid. My fave is Medal of Honor: Frontline. Great game.
Civ V was solid. I sunk like 120 hours into it in 2 years. Going to get Civ VI during my work and school vacation.”
I think there was a mission in singapore or something where you got to steal a person’s clothes and pretend to be a high ranking military personnel, it was easily my favorite. I have yet to play civ 5 i need to get a decent gaming computer. I’ma get skyrim and MW3 again this weekend.
“And MOH Airborne.
Rising Sun and Frontline I played as well. I think frontline was the D Day one. Yeah that was the bomb. I remember a North African one too.
Never played the CIV series….”
The airborne game seems to have really good background graphics and teh CIV series is basically the same as Age of Empires
Cossacks. This was a very good AOE like game I got one day. I think it was developed by a Russian studio, but with some tweaks and a bigger budget could have been an even better game than AOE.
FUCKIN HELL ME SOO HAWNY!!!
Seems like they actually went ahead and completely revamped it recently. Jesus that looks sweet.
If I start playing any of these games, I will regress to being a basement troll shitting in a bedpan within a week….
I’m already a basement troll..without a basement. Which game is that?
“the philosopher” exemplifies that there is no such thing as schizophrenia.
the so-called “schizophrenic” is just someone who is so wrapped up in himself, in his own “little world”, that he can’t see how his behavior/utterances may be judged crazy by other people.
binet’s test had the sole purpose of identifying the retarded. since binet psychologists have had the model that intelligence is a continuum between retarded and genius.
but their model for mental health is still of the binet kind. one is either sane or insane.
the Cynic is the extreme right of the mental health bell curve, but his behavior often overlaps with that of the insane, and thus he often appears mad.
Mugabe
You don’t understand what you’re talking about.
Schiz is not binary. True.
Schiz is not psychosis. True.
Schiz can arise as a personality disorder. True
3 types of schiz personality disorders:
Schizoid, Schizotypal and Para Schizo.
Schizophrenia/Psychosis>Schiz Disorder>OCD/GAD=Neurobal=Delta Male>Aspergers>Savantism>Autistic Retard
Michael Jackson was not schizophrenic.
He was not ‘mad’ because social constructionism or some other bullshit.
Narcissists don’t have self awareness either and people don’t call them crazy even though they’re eccentric.
Dump Michael Jackson into Siberia, and people still think he’s as ‘off’ as dumping him into the Ganges during the cow festival. Its not perception. Its a neurochemistry.
He is schizotypal. Jewgle it
Perhaps this will help:
Schiz/Psychosis (<2% of pop)<Schiz Disorder (sth like 2-3%)Delta Male (30%)>Aspy (2-3%)>Savant (1%)>Autist Retard (1%)
Those conditions are not features of a bell curve with technical arbitrary cutoffs. Not symmetrical. Because the right side is an artificial creation of Master, like orcs were made from elves by Sauron.
You can tell where someone falls into each of these buckets if you don’t wear rainjackets indoors.
Donkey Kong? are you serious?
my brother not only has an msc in civil engineering…
he has a “real world accomplishment”…
a few years ago he was the best Donkey Kong player in the world.
he was always great at video games, but he was motivated by The King of Kong to prove how good he was.
Your brother?
That means… Aha…
that means that if you type my real name into google you’ll find nothing.
click “images”. i’m not there.
i have zero internet “trace”.
True. I know your name though.
And your age.
Please respect the anonymity & privacy of commenters.
Thanks
I would never tell anyone. Don’t worry. I’m not a sociopath like destructure. I just troll here pretty much. I’m not a fucking sociopath.
you’ve confused my brother with me.
Nope. Destructure is wrong. I know your REAL name. Don’t care though. Wouldn’t tell anyone like I said.
the last time “destructure” commented here was when? only destructure would know.
those who were commenting here at the same time wouldn’t remember.
well…
unless they were really really desperate to suck my cock.
“Deal with it!” is a fag? or a girl?
I’m an alpha male.
so “Deal with it!” expects me to believe that he’s read comments years back? why?…
whyyyyyyyyyyyyy?
totally gay!
the only rational explanation is the one i’ve given before…
“Deal with it!” = peepee.
i wasn’t the one who made the “richest people in sweden” wiki, but it IS hilarious!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Swedes_by_net_worth
…
and NO you fucking schizo british-iranian-sock puppet. i have never declared my love of cock…the reason being…i don’t love cock.
I assure you he’s not me. Thousands of people read my blog, he could be any man on earth
I’m not iranian. That would make me 100 times more likely to be a full on Jew basher.
I have a more nuanced view of Jews.
What does that make me?
Not Iranian.
Roses are red, violets are blue
I am schizophrenic and so am I.
STOP LYING
Robert Mugabe is also kind of primitive and ugly looking…even for an African guy.
Anyhow, while these scores are very impressive, I wonder what are Mugabe’s (the commenter) real life achievements? And would they correspond well with his obvious raw brain power?
Mugabe’s comments have grown on me even though at first I thought they made no sense. I’ve sensed Mugabe’s IQ was very high just based on the knowledge in his comments, along with their witticisms and conciseness. And I’ve always assumed his vulgarity was meant to be ironic.
He has no accomplishments. He lives in a trailer and sports a mullet.
Its pretty obvious Mugabe from his comments:
Fact 1: Refers to himself as prole and hates finer aesthetic i.e. smart white/jew people things.
Fact 2: Has an interest in finance
Fact 3: Interviewed for DB consultancy shop
Fact 4: Background in chemistry
Fact 5: Mentions some latin ancestry
Fact 6: Seems angry all the time
Fact 7: Interest in soccer
Fact 8: High ability family bloodline
All those things are unusual for an average American in the 1 man.
Language suggests he is a man.
I think he mentioned he was gay once, but gays don’t have that tone so I don’t know.
I would say Mugabe is based around New York….due to Fact 8 and Fact 2/3.
I would say Mugabe’s interest in soccer means he is more than a few percent mixed heritage with Latino/Latin European background…..
…..I would say…..Mugabe’s schiz has prevented him from achieving really top level things (Fact 6), in the same way it has for me.
Yo no soy coolie.
You’re completely off-base here… Dude, you have the gift of gab but you lack LOGIC.
Well I’m not 100% right if that’s what you mean by lack of logic.
no. i’m far from new york.
but you’re half right.
my dad was born in nyc. his parents were born and grew up in nyc. as did their parents. there’s a mansion and a street in nyc named after my family. my granddad was an english prof at columbia for a while. my family name is very concentrated in the ne. there’s a portfolio manager at legg mason in nyc with my family name who looks just like my dad. google searches of my family name show that those who have it in america tend to occupy what might be called the upper upper middle class or petit rich. but as running bear has correctly pointed out, that’s not me. my mom’s family is from the deep south. her dad was an invigilated prodigy at mental arithmetic, a bookmaker, moonshiner, and felon. two of her cousins on her dad’s side became professors. one is in Who’s Who for fluid dynamics and turned down a professorship at stanford, because it rejected his more than qualified daughter. the other was a prof of romance languages.
so “Deal with it!” isn’t a racist, but he is a classist.
so american.
You’re obsessed with race though. Why? Cuz you’re bitter. Liberate yourself from hate.
liberate yourself from stupid.
Mugabe’s comments have grown on me even though at first I thought they made no sense.
Yes, he’s definitely an acquired taste.
Mugabe is damn smart. When he’s not going on his insane ramblings against ‘pee pee’ (funny stuff), I enjoy his comments. I also enjoy the back and forths on the IQ test threads between you and him.
Mugabe’s a good commenter when he’s not rambling on and on.
Mugabe is damn smart. When he’s not going on his insane ramblings against ‘pee pee’ (funny stuff)
But I think the “insanity” would really hurt him on the Wechsler, though Mugabe would argue it’s because the Wechsler has too much subjectivity. But without subjective scoring, you can’t really measure the most subtle parts of intelligence. If a computer can score the test, than a robot can do well.
what i assume you refer to as “real life accomplishments” are…
1. not up to the individual in whole or in part…(especially in the US and the anglo-sphere in general. the individualist ideology results in societies which are extremely conformist…like everything american it’s a lie and self-contradictory.)
2. not accomplishments at all if they add no years to one’s life or leisure or beauty. cocaine and whores wouldn’t make my life better.
lion and jews in general and americans in general are incapable of examining “status” or “success” critically. for them it means how much money they make. if they’re boring people with nothing interesting to say they still imagine that high income gets them something. what that something is i have no idea.
if one is born fairly well off by world and historical standards all the shit one has to put up with for “real life accomplishments” in the US, at least, is not even close to worth it.
lagom ar bast.
my great ambition was to be a medicinal chemist. top salary isn’t that high, much less than $200k per year like hiawatha’s…but the good one can do is priceless. in ‘mer’ca one must teach in order to pay for his PhD. i’ve always thought teaching was theft, and my professor ran out of funding. he hasn’t had any grad students since i left. i applied to my local state school, but it rejected my application and refused to say why. this again emphasizes #1. i sat the gmat and scored 770 only to learn that no business school worth attending would admit me, because i lacked the experience they wanted. so then i moved on to pass all the remaining actuarial exams on my first try only to be failed on the new subjective part of the SoA’s curriculum (which no one fails) and the society of actuaries refused to say why. again an example of #1.
all of the smart people i knew in hs have achieved whatever success they’ve achieved mediated by higher education.
i know what’s it like to be a nigger.
the SoA is an interesting case, because i asked someone i know who has won prizes for his writing to read what i’d submitted. he found nothing wrong with it.
his conclusion was that the problem was the one which smart people often complain of but which is rarely the reality…
the people who graded my submissions couldn’t understand what i’d written, not because it made no sense, but because they simply lacked the VIQ to understand it.
given it was the society of actuaries, this is another example of SLDR.
If you can be an actuary, you could probably be a data scientist. Why not switch over? I was thinking about retraining for that recently myself. No professional certs and fees needed per se.
You can then easily go into Wall Street, corporates, government jobs or Tech. Even insurance is moving that way.
Big Data is probably the hottest career right now. They would hire a guy wearing nothing but a barrel around his waist at this point.
i agree that might be possible…
if i lived in london.
1. not up to the individual in whole or in part…(especially in the US and the anglo-sphere in general. the individualist ideology results in societies which are extremely conformist…like everything american it’s a lie and self-contradictory.)
Well this goes back to your reaction norms argument, but applied to success, instead of IQ. I think if you cloned self-made U.S. billionaires and the self-made U.S. homeless, and raised them in a very different time and place, the success gap between their clones would close precipitously, yet would still remain large.
Society determines success, but so too does the individual.
2. not accomplishments at all if they add no years to one’s life or leisure or beauty. cocaine and whores wouldn’t make my life better.
Money probably can add many years to your life, leisure and beauty, and to the lives of those you care about, though the obsessive pursuit of money probably subtracts from all three.
lion and jews in general and americans in general are incapable of examining “status” or “success” critically. for them it means how much money they make.
Actually lion’s more concerned with “social class” than money. He sees money as just a means to getting status. I see it as highly valuable in its own right, but I also think you can be poor (by American standards) and still have a great life.
Pumpkin= liberal media
mugabe=trump
Unintentional propagation through critical publicity.
Mugabe’s intelligence> pumpkin’s.
Pumpkin= liberal media
mugabe=trump
Unintentional propagation through critical publicity.
Mugabe’s intelligence> pumpkin’s.
LOL! What makes you think the propagation is unintentional?
Oh he is very much like Trump in how he uses controversy to get attention.
And I’m very much like the media who uses that controversy to increase my ratings
The difference is, the media is now stuck with Trump as president while I have yet to be usurped by Mugabe.
Pumpkin’s intelligence > liberal media’s
So your analogy is accurate, but you’ve misunderstood it
“LOL! What makes you think the propagation is unintentional?”
So you intentionally propagate a madman? It’s what I mean, any publicity is good publicity in the eyes of trump/mugabe.
“Oh he is very much like Trump in how he uses controversy to get attention.
And I’m very much like the media who uses that controversy to increase my ratings””
How do you know he increases your ratings? There’s a difference between a casual and regular reader. Most casual readers probably do not understand anything he says. Mugabe’s intelligence>trump
“The difference is, the media is now stuck with Trump as president while I have yet to be usurped by Mugabe.”
You were usurped by him long ago. Every other post you make is about him, he spams your comment section, and he treats you like your his bitch. Despite all of this you still play into his game by giving him the attention he thrives on. Do you feel that? It’s his cock poking your brain.
He hasn’t usurped anyhing. At the end of the day, it’s still my blog, I set the agenda, and my readership keeps going way up
But you’re right; i give him too much attention & am too tolerant of his insults. In my eyes I was taking the high road & being secure enough to allow free speech, but from a ghetto perspective , allowing any disrespect to go unchallenged is being a weak little bitch
“You were usurped by him long ago. Every other post you make is about him, he spams your comment section, and he treats you like your his bitch. Despite all of this you still play into his game by giving him the attention he thrives on. Do you feel that? It’s his cock poking your brain.”
I lold.
“But you’re right; i give him too much attention & am too tolerant of his insults. In my eyes I was taking the high road & being secure enough to allow free speech, but from a ghetto perspective , allowing any disrespect to go unchallenged is being a weak little bitch”
It’s your blog, but it’s about him. I’m not telling you to go all “ghetto” on us and throw a temper tantrum back at him every time he insults you. I just think you’re enabling him, simultaneously he garners attention and gains the spotlight. He’s a histrionic. He can get annoying but he’s irrelevant to me I just figured you should know that the energy you devote to him is benefiting his “mentality” in a parasitic way towards you.
Oh i know he benefits emotionally. Trolls thrive on attention. But as Deal with It! said, part of what makes this blog unique is all the odd characters it attracts & he’s the most extreme example, so i thought readers might find a post about the GRE more entertaining if I included him; plus he knows a lot about the GRE so I wanted him to comment on it. When life throws you a lemmon, you make lemmonade 🙂
But I’m moving on to other topics in my next posts
I can understand that. Like i said he doesnt bother me besides just annoying me every now and then. If i had a blog he wouldve given me cancer by now
I don’t know much about the real Mugabe, but it seems like Zimbabwe has been worse under his dictatorship.
An African has been telling Americans that electing Trump is a big mistake. He says Trump will turn America into a complete dysfunctional state that one finds in many parts of Africa.
Already, people in NYC has been complaining about the gridlock in one of the most busiest sections of Manhattan. Businesses have been losing money and it’s the holiday season between now and the New Year. Furthermore, taxpayers are funding the protection of him and his family with the police.
I’ve never been to New York. How big is Trump in New York? Generally speaking, is Trump someone everyone would know even without the presidential run?
Even back in 2005, Trump ranked as one of the 100 most worshipped people in American history. Today he’d be in the top 10; possibly top 5.
The intelligentsia hates him but the common man sees him as a comic book hero
He has a few buildings located in the city with a lot of foot traffic. His place of residence at the Trump Tower is now heavily fortified, which is not far from Rockefeller Center. It is one of the busiest sections of Manhattan, especially when it comes to tourists during the holiday season. A gridlock would effect the shops and restaurants nearby. A few have claimed that business is down at least 20% ever since the gridlock.
yes. trump has been deliberately famous since the 80s. his game isn’t real estate development. his game is self-promotion. he’s the brand.
An African has been telling Americans that electing Trump is a big mistake. He says Trump will turn America into a complete dysfunctional state that one finds in many parts of Africa.
I’ve had similar concerns. Trump is the first Forbes 400 President, & one of the biggest problems with African leaders is their tendency to profit from public office.
Trump is unwilling to admit the huge conflict of interest of having his daughter’s husband in the White House while his daughter runs his multibillion dollar global empire.
Of course all Presidents profit from the office to a huge degree but Trump could take it to a whole new level
It’s not an issue, if he promises a stronger America with greater prosperity for all. But all tyrants throughout history have made such a promise and most have broken it.
We have 4 years to watch what he does. But I don’t have the patience and tolerance anymore, because my vision of America is that it has finally run its course, and is no longer the country what many people want. Globalization has a lot to do with it.
Don’t be so down JS. People said the same thing in the Depression, or after Stalin/Hitler carved up Europe.
Sometimes we have to fall down to learn how to pick ourselves back up again and be more robust.
Now everyone knows the mainstream media is Pravda and HBD is on the verge of mainstream status, mean like people accept alpha male/beta male distinctions today.
Its quite exciting actually in a way, although very dark at times.
If you read my comments, I’m not a proponent of American values, so it doesn’t effect me. I can no longer tolerate it, is my issue.
Just as academics are more concerned with knowledge acquisition than material acquisition, the latter symbolic of America, which is no longer sustainable, I see it as a non-issue. What bothers me is that the status quo wants to bring back a dead corpse.
What Americans don’t understand in today’s global era, the word is “fungible”.
the following multiple regression equation can be derived…
please give me a link. you calculate 1 in 1,343 or 7.4 in 10,000. in my simulation that was on the lower end. the average was about 11 in 10,000.
robert mugabe is a black nationalist. just because he’s black doesn’t mean he can’t be alt-right. and yes…look at his cv…listen to him…he’s definitely in the 1% of black africans intellectually. in his case the market dominant minority wasn’t jews. it was british gentile.
and if one assumes SLDR then 7.4 in 10,000 is a huge overestimate of the frequency.
please give me a link. you calculate 1 in 1,343 or 7.4 in 10,000. in my simulation that was on the lower end. the average was about 11 in 10,000.
What the hell are you doing a simulation for? You don’t know how to calculate standardized regression coefficients from a correlation matrix, or calculate the standard error there of?
To paraphrase Judge Judy, “where’d you get your math degree? A cereal box?”
give me a link fucktard. “multilinear regression for a multivariate normal distribution”
i never studied regression.
Nobody gave me a link! I had to pull myself up by my bootstraps using brains alone, though a Promethean told me about the method.
As the Pronethean said, math is the ultimate IQ test because everything can be derived from the basics.
If you need a tutor, then you have no talent.
I’ll give you a hint. In simple regression the standardized coefficient is simply the slope of the line of best fit.
But in multiple regression, we have two predictors so we have a plane of best fit and that plane has 2 slopes
as i suspected. you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I know precisely what I’m talking about. I’m talking about how to get the coefficients to determine the mean A score from a known V & Q score.
Once you know the mean A score of people with a perfect V & Q score, you determine the standard deviation (known in this context as the standard error of the prediction) & assuming a normal distribution around the predicted point on the plane of best fit, that tells you how many with perfect Vs & Qs will also get a perfect A.
And once you know the standardized coefficients of V & Q for predicting A, you must know how much of the variance the multiple regression equation explains. This is given by multiplying V’s correlation with A by the V coefficient and also multiply Q’s correlation with A by the Q coefficient, and then summing these two products.
Once you know how much of the variance is explained, the square root of that value subtracted from 1 is the standard error of the estimate, or the standard deviation of the analytical Z score for people with a given V and Q Z-score.
>mugabe
one might think he could simply call up the ETS and get an answer.
i did, and the answer was, “we don’t know. we don’t keep stats on the combined score.” very hard to believe. actually impossible. but that’s what i was told.
somewhere the ETS has all the scores of everyone who ever sat the old GRE. all they have to do is count the number of 2400s.
so dumb.
somewhere the ETS has all the scores of everyone who ever sat the old GRE. all they have to do is count the number of 2400s.
Keith Raniere of the Mega society was able to convince ETS to give him the distribution of the COMPOSITE score of the 5 million people who took the SAT from 1984 through 1988. The ETS is probably tight-lipped about such data because it’s potentially worth money.
by myself today. why?
my local family gathers at my aunt’s house, and her husband is an HBDer…so i don’t attend. how many times has he said, “it’s like height”?
of course he has some “personal” motivation for saying that as he was a biology major.
he’s also an example of how most wealth is inherited and how politics trumps all in ‘mer’ca.
he worked at ATF for a long time and finally was at the top. then he quit because of an incompetent politically appointee.
he inherited < $1m iirc. just some land and real estate. but enough that he has more than enough.
so lion says…autistically…
…I need a good salary to afford to live in DC…
1. you can work in DC and not live in DC.
2. you have $600k in liquid wealth. buy a house in the ex-urbs and commute. you’ll live like a king on $20k per year. what does a confirmed bachelor need? except gin?
3. i don’t get it. but that may be because i live in a trailer and sport a mullet.
speaking of mullets…
in the 90s i remarked (in an upon reflection i thought hyperbolic manner) that all three of the braves’ starting pitchers would make it to the hall of fame.
i was right.
maddux, smoltz, glavine…
in like flynn.
cue it billy-bob!
funny thing…that interview in manhattan for the db consultancy…
i also had two interviews in nj, but the manhattan folks wanted me most…so they had their local branch give me a personality test after my interview…
i guess i failed it.
but i did mention in a prole manner…”high rent”…but then the immediate superior of the hiring manager said…”why don’t you have better grades?”
it was in midtown.
oh…
and i mentioned i was a braves fan…
death!
Manhattan wasn’t expensive in 1995. This being said, America is a projectile of empty consumerism, until it falls like the Roman Empire…
Ahhh….I remember those ’95 Braves. Last time any Atlanta team was worth shit.
Personality is actually more important than aptitude and to be fair, they’ve done you a favour there if they felt your personality wasn’t a good fit.
Same when I was a banker. One can have 30 IQ points on most of my colleagues or work 3 times harder, but being the wrong fit for the culture or the nature of the work is the most important issue.
Most of the more demanding of the clients (and therefore, the bulk of one’s work) are OCD freaks and ADHD cowboy types who require patience, a dash of autism and great social skills. I don’t have that.
Client relationships, yessa masta and touching people’s legs is not for me.
I was very angry when they let go of me because it was a stepping stone to the big time in PE.
But they did me a favour. Its so obvious now. In a way I was using the bank/CFA study as an excuse not to develop myself in other ways. I think a lot of people in bureaucracies or on ‘the path’ as they say are really hiding in the weeds – not setting up a business, not doing an artistic pursuit, not approaching women, not getting involved in causes they believe in.
Its unfortunate one has to do a stint on the SELL side before one can go into the real finance side, which I would have liked intellectually. But themz the rulzez and like Pumpers says, intelligence is about – adaptation.
So now I’m in a situation I actually love best deep down – I make the rules and the money the way I likes it. Life is more exciting that way.
I sincerely still think there is much opportunity money wise out there for everyone with a high IQ. I know this has changed a bit in the last 20 years but it’s still very possible. Most people are actually hobbled by lack of risk taking/testosterone, more than subpar IQ.
Making money isn’t really a focus anyway. I want to make enough to give me a passive income to cover my lifestyle, which I believe I can do within 5 years. I don’t need money to get laid. I’ll never marry. I don’t have kids. And I can get the more expensive things I want by proxy purchase or bargain hunting.
It’s all about TIME. What are you going to do with it. You get MONEY TO BUY TIME. HOW DO YOU MAX OUT TIME IS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION.
i’ll comment on the rest later, but…
in the US the CFA isn’t worth a “hill of beans” unless one has an MBA from an elite school…or is already employed by an elite firm.
“the philosopher” makes the broader point in ways he’s unaware of…
london is the financial capital of the world!
i considered doing the CFA…at the same time i considered doing the IBD master distiller…
meaningless for me…
truck drivers make more…at least in the US right now…and it’s not like the competition is stiff…
just another example of the absurd in-efficiency of the “free market”.
that is,
the absurd in-efficiency of the “free market” in allocating human capital.
Human capital allocates itself. Relying on a deity to do it….
Truck drivers are going to be automated.
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-fi-automated-trucks-labor-20160924/
Although many CFA holders too!!! Hahahaha
Click to access Accenture-Wealth-Management-Rise-of-Robo-Advice.pdf
You hate Zion because you’re an Iranian Muslim living in Britain.
Deal with it!, can you tell us a bit about how you know so much about this blog.
Are you a former regular who posted under a different name either here or on LOTB?
Besides Santo — this blog is riddled with one or two of the same. You know whom I’m talking about.
Ranking in Sweden Name Citizenship Net worth (USD) Sources of wealth
1 Edwin Bergström Sweden 1 USD Gay
so un-pc but so hilarious.
where are all the sitting bulls to object to The Great Flydini?
regarding lawyers…
i did the College Bowl and…
i qualified for my school’s team via an intramural team competition. in this competition there was a guy who answered all the questions for his team. the other three never said anything. it was absurd. and his team won…iirc.
when we were on the same team at the regionals we answered the same number of questions.
this guy went on to earn a jd from an un-prestigious law school…UC davis…
but because he was a russian major he now works for one of the “magic circle” law firms in its moscow branch.
in VIQ this guy was my equal.
in math/nat sci/non-V…maybe not so much.
and if “Deal with it!” says…
“why’d he’d go to that shitty law school?”
i don’t know. i was surprised.
the two possibilities i’ve thought of are:
1. it paid his way.
2. despite his 99th percentile VIQ he did poorly on the LSAT or had mediocre grades.
both of these seem un-likely…so it’s a mystery…
like 7-Up and bourbon and raleigh’s and bailing at 25k feet.
and this guy made the point that america does NOT segregate its talent very well. in the context of my uni…like me…he was a freak!
“why’d he’d go to that shitty law school?”
Closer to home? Cheaper? A lot of people don’t see the point of attending a prestigious college (and some experts agree). LOTB attended a law school that was beneath his ability because his parents didn’t think it mattered, and he’s devoted his blog to advising others to avoid the same “mistake”.
Lion is an interesting case. He does seem very logical in a way top lawyers and law students are but he doesn’t seem like a trivia buff.
Anyway, attending a prestigious law school matters a lot more than attending a prestigious undergrad school. Your law school’s prestige and law school grades determine the rest of your career. Lion graduated in the top 10 % at ASU Law in the pre-2008 economy and still couldn’t get a BIGLAW position. He would’ve been a shoe-in for at least some firms with median grades at a T14 law school. No wonder he’s bitter! I’d be too.
Yea your buddy Vladimir is alpha as fuck.
it was allen & overy securities law.
I’ll be retaking the LSAT on December 3. I hope to improve on my paltry score from the first time I took it.
It makes no sense to me…800 SAT verbal…98% Verbal GRE…decent GMAT…high Wechsler Verbal Comprehension…shitty LSAT (been scoring around 164 on practice tests).
What’s the deal? Maybe I don’t even wanna be a lawyer. Like Mugabe said, most are pushy strivers/sociopaths anyhow.
And that 164 is after months of studying. Feel like crap that I won’t be doing better than this.
unlike the GRE general there are stats on perfect scores on the LSAT and GMAT…
on both…at most 1 in a 1,000…very rare.
isn’t the LSAT a lot like the old GRE analytic? lots of logic problems? or is that just the way it used to be?
Wasn’t the old GRE Analytic both logic games and logical reasoning type questions? Because that’s what the LSAT is (plus reading comprehension.)
yeah. but the “logical reasoning” questions are fucking easy.
so the LSAT hasn’t changed?
“Deal with it!”claims he scored 171.
and on top of that he fakes being an injun.
no chance…even for a negro.
the first nations are there!
bullshit!
watch and get it! even though it’s ridiculous.
sports.mearsonlineauctions.com/ItemImages/000035/d95eb1db-c6a7-4b3e-bffb-093afc0eaffc_lg.jpeg
It makes no sense to me…800 SAT verbal…98% Verbal GRE…decent GMAT…high Wechsler Verbal Comprehension…shitty LSAT (been scoring around 164 on practice tests).
I would expect the Wechsler working memory index (especially the arithmetic subtest) to be perhaps at least as predictive of LSAT scores as the verbal comprehension index.
The LSAT is very good at testing subtlety and LOGIC. WAIS VIQ, on the other hand, is about how many useless words and trivia you can fit in your brain. So you’d probably score in 150s range. Has nothing to do with working memory. Top law students are extremely subtle and logical.
Only the information and Vocab subtests of the WAIS measure knowledge/trivia
And working memory is in some ways the opposite of subtlety. More like brute mental force
Good legal arguments require lots of subtlety but whether the LSAT does, i don’t know
I was scoring in the 175-180 range on practice tests. I CHOKED on test day! Why? Couldn’t sleep two nights before the test. Disaster.
I couldn’t sleep for two nights beforehand as well, and scored a 180.
1500 on the SAT I.
I always felt like a lot of people scored well on the sats who were not the smart when I talked to them. I’ve rarely felt that way about the LSAT
always felt like a lot of people scored well on the sats who were not the smart when I talked to them. I’ve rarely felt that way about the LSAT
Yes, but that might be because high LSAT people regress to a higher mean (college grads) than high SAT people (high school grads), and not because the LSAT is a better IQ test.
SAT is a joke but it used to be harder back in the day. The pre-1995 SAT had an insanely high ceiling and analogies which are more g-loaded.
Only 6 more days. I’ve resigned myself to 164. Whatever. I’ll still be able to get into good schools 🙂
why won’t peepee post it?
fuck!
my cue to 5:20 didn’t work!
ff to 5:20! puh-leeze.
the very word “meritocracy”…
what’s its origin?
do y’all know?
an appetizer…the son of the man who coined the term wrote this…entertaining book…
the coiner of the term HATED meritocracy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_of_the_Meritocracy
watch The American Ruling Class…it’s worth it! really!
unlike jeronimo the young burt reynolds was…
1. part injun.
2. a sexbot.
looks a lot like the young brando.
Btw from LSAC’s website…
“The correlations between UGPA and first-year law school grades ranged from .06 to .43 (median is .26). However, correlations between LSAT scores combined with undergraduate grade-point averages and first-year law school grades ranged from .31 to .64 (median is .48).”
http://www.lsac.org/jd/lsat/your-score/law-school-performance
In light of my previous comments, I should add the following…..
WE should be careful to not overhype any given test. Smart people aren’t smart on every single test. And there are other reasons for why someone might struggle on a test that have nothing to do with intelligence. The best way to assess verbal intelligence is to talk to a person.
Nixon seemed like a genius. He was superbly articulate and not in the way most people conceive of “articulate”. He was extremely precise. Contrast this with writers of fiction. Most fiction writers have a big vocabulary but none are as precise as Nixon, the lawyer!
Russian/classicists/philosophy = very high V. There are a lot of reasons one may end up going mid tier uni….e.g. your parents don’t have a fucking clue, social reasons to be with friends, lack of finance. When you’re young you make more mistakes. When you have semi-illiterate parents with no secondary education, you make even more.
A meritocratic system should be designed to help one correct mistakes, in time, should they desire. Not to stamp ‘smart’ ‘dumb’, ‘mediocre’ on people’s foreheads after a pen and paper exercise for life.
e.g. CHINA
As for meritocracy, the Beeb did a similar doc for the UK.
I expect people of very high ability to find a way anyway to be honest, despite the structural barriers. Intelligence is about adaptation. Not following the instruction manual. Anything else is defeatism.
If you don’t crack it on ‘the path’: Set up a fucking business. Meet like minded people/network etc.
I never went to an Ivy or Oxbridge which rules me out of Goldman, McKinsey, Blackstone, and many such firms immediately.
But I eventually did interview at Bain, JP Morgan and McKinsey last year coming from a Tier 2 school.
What they said makes sense: They cannot go to every single college in Alabama or Romania to seek out the brightest 1%. They don’t have resources. They know Ivy/Oxbridge have a lot of nepo hires or endowment kids. But it’s far more efficient that turning over every stone in the garden. Within the 1% of aptitude and cultural fit, most will funnel into the I/O.
They assume very superior people will find a way through networking, as a technical/’expert’ hire, project work in a corporation and so on.
Lloyd Blankfein made it into Goldman as a commodities salesman in a boutique before his firm was bought by Goldman. Tons of people have weird career trajectories that smite of opportunism. Some morons would call it ‘luck’.
If you can’t find a way past the barrier, you are not thinking creatively.
As the Americans say…Can Do Attitude.
As for CFA:
1. The curriculum is just very useful to know anyway for personal investing.
2. I think it does help with some mid tier employers, and top ones at the margin.
3. It is reaching a tipping point in ‘pre-requisitibility’ in certain strata in finance – namely: long only, some hedge funds, wealth management/advisory and investment consultancies like Towers Watson or similar shop you interviewed with.
The CFA should really split it into an asset management and corp finance stream. Straddling the two is stupid. That is basically the two types of finance anyway. Most top Master Degrees are structured so.
Well Risk Management is the other type, but there’s the FRM,quant or actuarial path for that.
America is a sham and here are few reasons why meritocracy doesn’t work, besides the fact that Jews have usurped everything that make them wealthier than gentiles.
I don’t vouch for more meritocracy in America for these reasons:
More wealthy Whites in America, signifies a Greater Prole Americana.
More wealthy East Asians are a waste as usual.
More wealthy blacks, and we get OJ Simpson and Kanye West, basically more blacks wasting money like drunken sailors.
Lawdee Lawdee,
How am I gonna resist those games?
Donkey Kong isn’t a competitive game dumbledoreass.
How am I gonna resist?
Oh Muhcy on mah sole!
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/lotr/images/b/ba/Smeagol_5.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20060310225156
https://www.msc.org/multimedia/images/certified-species/sole-dover-common
Just finished the Ruling Class Doc you put up.
Probably one of the best documentaries I’ve seen.
Banjo underrated instrument.
Must easier to go staccato on 7th scales with Banjo
I love my 7ths. Sounds nice and sour.
Some needs to do a documentary about how music killed the banjo and xylophone.
Sunny!
Hahahaha. What a great song.
once again peepee has demonstrated that she cannot grasp the difference between mathematics and numerology.
the correct answer is exactly 0.057711830005688%. why the simulation overestimated the frequency idk. the answer to my question is NOT easy to find. the formula is NOT obvious.
E(X|Y,Z) = 1/(1 – rho(Y,Z)^2)*((rho(X,Y) – rho(Y,Z)*rho(X,Z))*y + (rho(X,Z) – rho(X,Y)*rho(Y,Z))*z)
VAR(X|Y,Z) = rho(X,Y)^2 + rho(X,Z)^2 – rho(X,Y)rho(X,Z)rho(Y,Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_normal_distribution#Conditional_distributions
probability of scoring 800 on V = 0.36%
on A given that he has scored 800 on V = 43.54%
on Q given that he has scored 800 on V and A = 37.30%
P(X,Y,Z) = P(Z)P(Y|Z)P(X|Y,Z)
probability of scoring 800 on V = 0.36%
I arrived at a very similar figure
on A given that he has scored 800 on V = 43.54%
I would have arrived at a very similar figure, had I done it in that sequence
on Q given that he has scored 800 on V and A = 37.30%
I arrived at a 53% chance of scoring 800 on A given a score of 800 on both V and Q
that should’ve been…
VAR(X|Y,Z) = rho(X,Y)^2 + rho(X,Z)^2 – 2*rho(X,Y)rho(X,Z)rho(Y,Z)
this also proves again that prometheans are morons.
this also proves again that prometheans are morons.
Uh, no. If there are any mistakes in my numbers (and I don’t think there are), they are entirely my own. A Promethean merely told me about multiple regression, he didn’t endorse any of my actual calculations.
You appear to have used an entirely different technique, but there’s more than one way to solve the same math problem (though we shouldn’t arrive at different answers)
The Philosopher claims to be a schizo with high VIQ. I believe the latter but he has shown no signs of schizophrenia. He just seems like a slightly odd guy. Nothing too crazy. Is there even such a thing as a high functioning schizo? Maybe if treated with meds. Is the philosopher on meds?
psychiatry in the anglo-sphere is a business, and at the same time the anglo-sphere individualist ideology always finds the locus of pathology in the individual. if your life sucks, it’s because you suck. put the two together and you have the highest rate of psychiatric diagnoses in the world…most of them fraudulent.
i take 4 medications
In Canada and America, people brag about their mental illness. At least certain kinds. No one brags about schizophrenia or autism but people will be forthcoming about depression, anxiety (not social anxiety though), claustrophobia and the other less serious ones… What’s behind this behavior? Some kind of tortured genius signalling? It’s as if the sufferers think their illness frivolous.
i haven’t noticed that, but it’s the same reason homos come out of the closet. part of selling psychiatry is de-stigmatizing mental illness. people who’ve been sold want to show how virtuous they are by not being ashamed of their illness, real or imagined.
depression and anxiety are the biggest scams. drugs may help, but that doesn’t mean they’re real illnesses. some people may get depressed or anxious for no good reason, but they’re a tiny minority. it’s much easier to change the individual, adapt him to his situation, than to change society.
i don’t know what the source is but:

certainly child psychiatry is much bigger in the US and anglo-sphere than anywhere else. if your kid has issues, it’s not your fault. adult psychiatry i don’t know. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122490928
Mugabe/Deal With Dildo
Yeah in the same way there’s such thing as high functioning autist commonly known as aspergers.
Schiz has not been studied nearly as much as autist due to the fact that many psychiatrists and their children have it in small doses or full blown.
If I was a psychiatrist what side of the spectrum would I study? Hmmmm. Tough one.
If you think my mentioning my place on the schiz spectrum makes people more likely to be open to my rather taboo ideas, you must think I’m operating some 4D persuasion game that I’m not aware of. People think the ideas are crazy alone.
It is obviously better that I don’t. But since the S-A spectrum is a very powerful model for predicting how people interpret their world, it has to be remarked upon, even in my case, because indeed I do not see things as others see them. I had previously not remarked on it until Pumpkin released a post some time ago on the topic.
From above:
Schiz is not binary. True.
Schiz is not psychosis. True.
Schiz can arise as a personality disorder. True
3 types of schiz personality disorders:
Schizoid, Schizotypal and Para Schizo.
The spectrum is maybe:
Schizophrenia/Psychosis>Schiz Personality Disorder>OCD/GAD=Neurobal=Delta Male>Aspergers>Savantism>Autistic Retardate
Michael Jackson was not schizophrenic in the Hollywood sense. Bill Gates is not autistic in the Rain Man sense either.
Madness is not quite social constructionism, pharmaceutical marketing campaign or some other bullshit.
Whether one regularly medicates for a personality disorder, to be honest should be a personal decision, that I have chosen at this point not to take.
Trump mentioned above that I’m not self aware and thats why I seem crazy….Narcissists don’t have self awareness either and people don’t call them crazy even though they’re eccentric.
Dump Michael Jackson into Siberia, and people still think he’s as ‘off’ as dumping him into the Ganges during the cow festival. It’s not perception. It’s a neurochemistry.
He is a classic schizotypal. Jewgle it.
He can still make millions and have a good time. He was still coherent. Many people with social intelligence liked him deeply. But nobody is going to slam his fist on a boardroom table and say: “Gat Michael in. Michael what’s your opinion on the last quarterly data”
On GAD/Depression: I think they are illnesses. But I also think certain civilised societies demands cause them. Notice how half black/half white men suffer more from it….primitive brain clash with white brain=phenotype out of sync in a white man’s world.
They may be happier on the plains.
Likewise….hahahaha….can you join the dots?
The reason incidence of mental illness has shot up is largely the same as the reason heroin addiction has gone up in USA.
Which comment writer on the Lion’s blogosphere seem deranged to you?
I’m thinking Lion needs reassurance/advice from his readers who are truly in their own alternative universe.
PP’s blog has given me insight on one thing: Smart people have been manipulating dumb people since the dawn of time.
Regarding Donald Trump’s IQ, I clock it at 110. During his campaign, he probably got a lot of feedback from his 2 oldest children who are at least in the 120 range, which helped him a lot.
Regarding the Anglo-Sphere, Englishmen were and are less darwinistic than their Continental cousins. They were foolish to embrace primitives and are smart enough to counteract it with HBD.
Mugabe wrote the SAT before 1995? I think so. Makes his 1560 very impressive.
scratch all that.
the simulation is the only way to do it.
regression works for points, but 800, 800, 800 is NOT a point.
one is not looking for the distribution of X given Y = 800 and Z = 800, one is looking for the distribution for X given that Y >= 800 and Z >= 800.
so for example the equations i gave above give different answers depending on which two sections one chooses to regress the third on.
the simulation has given between 5 and 21 per 10,000.
1 19
2 17
3 6
4 9
5 12
6 8
7 9
8 11
9 19
10 13
11 10
12 14
13 12
14 8
15 17
avg 12.2666666667
regression works for points, but 800, 800, 800 is NOT a point.
one is not looking for the distribution of X given Y = 800 and Z = 800, one is looking for the distribution for X given that Y >= 800 and Z >= 800
Yeah, I thought of that distinction, but I figured 800 is so extreme that virtually everyone who was >= 800 was not much more than 800
Had I used multiple regression on >800 V and Q scores instead of =800 V and Q scores, the expected A score would have been a bit higher, and the standard deviation would have been a bit larger, so the end result is a perfect A (given perfect V and Q) would have been somewhat less rare than I predicted.
On the other hand, as you noted, SLODR, would make all predictions more rare than I predicted, so it might cancel out.
the equations above can be used to generate the third random score however. i did this and the results were the same as using all that eigen stuff…11-12 per 10,000.
the following problem might arise with different correlations or different ceiling z scores:
one could have two 800s and using regression conclude, erroneously, that scoring 800 on the third section given these two 800s was less likely than scoring 800 on the third section.
the data on income vs life expectancy is a bit of a mystery. it must be calculated based on income and mortality at various ages. the problem with this is sick people usually don’t make a lot of money.
mortality rates decreased during the great depression and in greece during ww ii when food was scarce.
per capita gdp is not especially well correlated with life expectancy past a low threshold. http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/wp-content/uploads/life-expectancy-v-gdp.png
In countries where there is a big earnings gap between rich and poor, life expectancy is lower while mental illness, obesity and drug and alcohol abuse are all more common…The real surprise is that it’s not only the poor who suffer. The population as a whole do less well if the gap is wider. The nations with the smallest wealth gap and the lowest incidence of health and social problems are the Japanese and the Scandinavians. The biological explanation for this is uncertain, but possibly mediated by the hormonal effects of perpetual anxiety about status and position, or loss of them. Economics affects health but not always as you might expect…There is evidence that in periods of economic expansion people smoke and drink more, sleep less, work longer, experience more stress, and suffer more industrial injures – all bad for health. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/the-real-reason-swedes-live-longer-1948730.html
so it appears that the difference in life expectancy between rich and poor in the US is larger than it is elsewhere and is NOT due directly to the difference in income, but rather to the mindset of sociopaths like running bear which is fed to the masses by their evil masters every day. it’s the american way, and it kills people…including “the winners”. there is also the phenomenon that the correlation of income and IQ produces another correlation between eating healthfully and exercising. americans spend a smaller % of their income on food than any other people. i think the number of people so poor that they can’t eat healthfully is small. as dean ornish noted, “this a third world diet.”
the US is also unique in its poor’s lack of access to health care. this should increase the difference.
the recent small increase in mortality among middle aged white non-graduates supports the above quote…the increase in mortality was not due to obesity, as one might expect, nor to any disease…it was entirely due to drugs, alcohol, and suicide!
let’s ask the philosophaster if the chavs get the same care the toffs get in blighty.
another point of trivia: monks live as long as women, yet they’re all poor.
Poor is a lifestyle not a diet or a good doctor. This is where an anthropological approach is better than a quant one, where the people that wear rain jackets indoors will never get it from the numbers alone.
Monks live long cos they don’t fight, they don’t compete, they’re on high quality welfare, they don’t do drugs, they don’t drink much, they don’t have cortisol. Cortisol is possibly worse than smoking: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/a-stressful-workplace-could-take-33-years-off-your-life-expectancy-study-finds-a6713011.html
In the UK the proles live better lives than America, because welfare is not withdrawn after a period, healthcare is free, the poor are not as low IQ as in America and regulation of the environment, food, medicine, payday lending and so on exposes them to less toxins and cortisol. QED.
you are correct sir.
it is my belief…i have no proof…that the so called “successful” are less stressed by all the shit and hard work that’s usually required to be “successful”. this is a personality trait independent of IQ.
so either they are blessed with an un-reactive physiology or in some parallel universe where all that shit is different they would be stressed. either way they’re lucky.
me? very very reactive physiology as far as i can tell. just talking on the phone sends my bp to the ceiling. long hard work has made me physically ill several times. on two occasions it was life threatening…pneumonia. less than 8 hours of sleep and i’m physically ill…stomach pain, diarrhea, and i want to vomit.
and i’m hardly alone:
1. morning people make better marks in school and make more money.
2. they have significantly lower IQs than night people.
the world is built for average. night people are the minority. when the exceptional “succeed”…it is exceptional.
I don’t get more than 6 hours of sleep. It’s often just 4-5 hours. 8 hours makes me tired. I was reading biographies of famous people the other day and noticed a common theme. The most prolific and well-regarded inventors/scientists/entrepreneurs etc had incredible mental energy. They were workaholics. For instance, Newton only needed 3-4 hours of sleep daily.
http://amolife.com/personality/great-people-sleep-less.html
Sleep less or more is not enough or uniquely causal with mental energy. So… imnsonia people would be geniuses… 😉
Mental energy or ”flow mental state” tend to happen obviously when people are awake, 😉
You can sleep more and ”still” have greater mental energy, of course, correlations…
Hyper-vigilance tend to produce hyper-perceptiveness, pre-conditions to the creative jumps.
Newton also was fervorous religious isn’t* And believe that the word of bible is factual tend to correlate with lower intelligence, and logically correlated…
Night people tend to be dark triad personality.
Some ”people” think like that
”if a sleep less and many ”great[ers]” sleep less, so i’m a genius”
”if a giant is a man, and i’m a man, so i’m a giant”
noooooo
waaaayyyy
Notice the way ‘loser’ is not related to bank balance, awards, prizes, IQ, achievement or even fame, height and good looks.
It is a completely predictive variable of testosterone.
The thug on the street corner in Chicago has low IQ, no money, no future, no community praise, no fame, and in many cases ugly.
But nobody will call him a ‘loser’.
The middle aged office manager worried about deadlines, donating to Stop Racism! , paying attention to his kids, and so on…..maybe.
Loser is an instinctive designation according to Darwin’s Algorithm.
It is not a social construction.
Being seen to be a loser is directly inversely proportional to how much women lust fr you.
Testosterone predicts survival+replication the most among males in a deregulated env..
Ergo, one of the best metrics is women. Their hearts, vaginas and minds are Nature’s intention of you…and the human race…..
As Freud said, the only seemingly foolproof way of hacking the pleasure principle without side effect is being a lothario….
You cannot say anything about human nature without taking the Red Pill.
de botton claims “loser” is an americanism.
our president elect likes the winner/loser distinction too.
the very use of the term contains so much ideology:
1. if you’ve lost it’s 100% down to you.
2. the game is worth playing.
3. the game is fair.
4. winning the game is virtue. losing is vice.
5. everyone can be a winner…even though this is a contradiction in terms.
6. americans are such status whores that they must hate those who lack status as if they had rabies.
7. the US may be unique afaik in world history. just as hitler revaluated all values into aryan and jew, america has done the same with rich and poor. as shitting bull has said elsewhere…even if the poor weren’t innately bad people, poverty tands to make them bad people…even virtue is for sale.
…poverty tends to make…
but the individualist ideology and its pseudo-science hereditism, will have none of it. if your life has been shit and you’re shit, it’s your fault.
the “winning-ism” and the individualist ideology of the US along with its perverted “propositional nation” bullshit…results in its absurdly high incarceration rate…even for women like peepee. there are now 8x as many women in US prisons as there were in 1980.
and the above is pertinent to my own life. my dad was a good prosecutor, but when the reaganites started with “lock ’em up and throw away the key” he quit. why? because it was evil. he’d have become da, and my parents together would’ve been in the 1% of income…didn’t happen.
america is for winners…
Philosopher write only gargabes**
PP is from Anglo Canada, which is why people here complain about the Anglosphere. And no one here has any real insights on French Canada, other than the fact there is a lower gini coefficient, higher quality of life and less competition. Anglo Capitalists want you to believe the western world revolves around competition for useless, yet abundant resources. The reason why foolish Americans are now shaken to the core: Globalization has allowed 3rd world nations to take that privilege away from them.
Basic income is coming to Ontario. Anglo Canada isn’t as bad as USA. Anglo Canadians aren’t as greedy.
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2016/10/07/basic-income-is-coming-to-ontario-now-what.html
Well yeah, no group of people are as greedy as American Jews.
Americans have no class, but lifestyle criteria. You can be a wealthy or poor prole and live in Manhattan, feasting and flaunting, while a poor intellectual type is living in some place remote, trying to achieve some kind of lifestyle resembling a form of consumerism that defines America. Lion’s class doesn’t exist. I told him many times. Americans are all proles whose main objective is the pure pursuit of money.
Recently in New York, there was a gruesome murder that would come out of a horror movie that PP loves to watch. A wealthy Jew’s adopted prole son stabbed another guy to death in a fancy apartment after partying for the whole night in an upper class neighborhood in Manhattan and then tried to bury him along the Jersey Shore line. He turns out to be a neighbor of Donald Trump’s son and the Jewish dude knows Donald Trump. Now how do you define class in Manhattan? You can’t, it’s either you have money or you don’t.
And most American intellectuals/academics are all about profit and not knowledge for reasons that America is 100% capitalism and 0% self actualization. The entire system is set up to be only about money. There is no other country in the world, where people of all walks of life hoards all kind of useless junk, because the general trend is that collectibles are investments that can be turned into a buck.
Mugabe/JV talks about Canadians having no class, simply because Canada is entirely the middle class. The United States is the only country that has no class, but only proles with education and proles without or few of it. It’s all about lifestyle with Americans. You have poor people who live in public housing who shop at places where the wealthy shop…this is only an American phenomenon.
have i?
i was just basing it on peepee. one data point.
and hockey.
and rob ford…who was from a rich family i believe. hard to tell.
and their horrible accents.
i went to a fight, and a hockey game broke out.
but you’re right of course JS. americans have no class. they used to feel ashamed of it…hence henry james’s “americo-european myth”. now they just want everyone to be an american…which they have sadly had some success in accomplishing.
American proles define status with lifestyle only, the more money = the more hedonism = hence the more status. Ivy League Investment bankers party with state college-frat boys. It’s all about the money. Lion is wrong about Proles vs SWPLs.
And about the Ivy League, its graduates don’t care for learning, they want money, no questions asked!
Americans are class unaware. People marry up or marry down, because they want money.
and that radio show Q…utter garbage.
but i remember a french canadian woman actuary who was hired at about the same time i was…SCHUH-WING!
Anglo Canada is less happy than French Canada, no surprise to you that the entire Anglosphere is misery. So why do people continue to live under Britain’s psychopathic tradition of colonialism? It’s all about money.
and come on!
australia, nz, canada…
it’s where all the stupid brits went or were sent against their will.
being british is bad enough. being british and stupid is super bad. the brits can’t even play football or cricket or rugby or tennis…all games they invented.
but the afrikaners are super prole too, so it’s a western branch of the germanic languages thing.
Brit Scurvy Lepers are terrible people. They hate everyone and themselves. The dumb Limey bastards still have not integrated any of their colonial subjects for hundreds of years and the Scots, Welsh and Irish, their unlovely neighbors. Spaniards have defeated all their enemies, by forcing them to join the Spanish matrix. It’s 2016, Spain’s flamenco singing gypsies the gitanos are now essentially extinct and now Spanish.
and british people age like…super fast…have you noticed? the gallagher bros have aged fairly well…because they’re irish.
and the >= 800 is not just theoretical. on the old GRE, iirc, it was possible to miss 4 questions and still make an 800 on the verbal. so a perfect raw score on the verbal would have been even more SDs than its already high number. (but how many GRE takers do have english as a second language?) the ETS has this info, but refuses to divulge it. why? if it’s worth money…to whom are they selling it?
Fidel Castro was a great man. RIP.
the cuban economy was deliberately sabotaged by the US…the embargo.
so one wonders how the island would have fared without it…and how it would have fared without the revolution.
among latin american countries…cuba’s gdp per capita (PPP) is ahead of mexico’s, behind the even whiter uruguay and the chicago boys’ chile.
just more proof that:
1. race trumps economic policy…except for north korea.
2. communism/socialism was never an economic failure. this is a huge lie…told so often that the bewildered herd believes it must be true…a “truism”.
Instead Jew-united States is a big satan, i doubt US sabotaged cuban economy, embargo and nothing more…
US is sabotaging Iranian economy* No way.
Do yourself and no cry…
One of the fundamental reason that there are second and third world countries in capitalistic world is
RACE
in big letters
Even capitalism///material-ism is intrinsically evil, this is the true…
So capitalism itself is not the reason to their own fail in many countries.
Why US is in decadence,
”capitalism fault”**
No
psychopaths in the power, as always has been.
materialism attrack $$/material-leaning people to the top, the disgrace to the capitalism.
communism attrack different type of psychotrashes, those who are more purely inclined to the power than to the material power.
we agree on every point except that the embargo wasn’t sabotage.
Deal is retarded…
Fidelito should have died a long time ago.
I have little impression that many dumb people would like to be a ”lawyer”.
People who apply justice can be cretin.
A person who cry the death of this garbage is not in the perfect moral and mental conditions to advocate the defense or accusation of anyone.
But do not worry, the ” IQ ” is everything …
IQ is another cultural shit invented by the eternal Anglo-Saxon barbarians. Nowhere else have cognitive tests been as successful as in the Anglo-sphere. But I have the feeling that soon China will overcome them.
He was a great… a great piece of shit, just like any other dictator.
He had half a century to improve Cuba, to revolutionize it, how a true genius would be capable, and what he did **
It was dependent on Soviet aid until its end.
He made propaganda of his supposed social and economic achievements, and yet Cuba was already an exceptional country by Central American standards before the revolution.
He could have approached the United States, made concessions and agreements shortly after the end of the Soviet Union,
He has never adapted to new situations, and the result is this rusty country.
An old psychopath who should have been murdered at the same time as Guevara.
The Anglo-Sphere is now the cultural desert or de-civilization of the West.
It all started with Francis Bacon of England — An intellectual and a philosopher, but he eventually became a sociopath, the pursuit of money and base pleasure ruined him for good…sound like America and the rest of the English speaking world.
Descartes and Bacon, a Frenchman and an Anglo-Saxon, both intellectuals lived in the same time, and look how different their people have become.
and all this time i though santa claus was a retard…because he was brazilian.
i was wrong.
IQ is another cultural shit invented by the eternal Anglo-Saxon barbarians.
EXACTLY!
Great day. All commies need to go.
that’s not it.
the brits don’t age prematurely…
they age badly.
there are some f—ing gorgeous women in their late 40s in spain and italy…not in the uk…vomit!
and it’s not just a fair skin vs olive complexion thing…it’s NOT just sun damage…the irish age well…and among them are “the fairest of them all”.
most attractive “coloration” per se, at least in a woman…
black hair, pale skin, freckles, light blue eyes…aka…irish!
but “coloration”…like penis size…is only a very small part of what makes someone sexually attractive.
SCHUH-WING!
Eat or be eaten, that’s the question.!!!
how’s the gay conversion therapy coming santa claus?
Chocolate babies and their
irrelevant commients, as usual…
Now, Mugabi is
Heidegger nonsense fan,
Fidel Castro scout boy,
If you have some respect here, it’s falling downhill hispanish.
Chocolate babies is that guy who are ”manly” only online… in the real life he is a nervous chicken, 😉
Stupid…
stupid does..
Brazil = land of the trashiest proles
”Brazil = land of the trashiest proles”
Many brazilians behave like gypsy romas…
”Brazil = land of the trashiest proles”
Just because most of brazilian proles are NEGROS
Are you racist***
You’re retarded, i don’t know you call Mugabi, your commie friend, a retarded, if you are the same shit, 😉
These tests (GRE and SAT) sometimes make me want to bang my head against a wall.
Based on all of the speculation I’ve heard here from PP and the empirical results we know that even the old SAT correlated roughly .86 to IQ tests, this implies that for example a result of 1250 (High enough to get into Mensa) actually implies an IQ of 125 (Close but no cigar) and it weirds me out that there’s such an oversight.
Food for thought.
I mean does nobody have anything to say about this?
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1993/5/7/report-discloses-sats-admit-rate-pa/?page=1
This report suggests that the average IQ at Harvard for an undergraduate in the mid 90’s was in the 140’s. And yet both regressions and estimates by PP suggest this is wrong, correlation with IQ tests suggest this is wrong, and empirical data on later undergraduates (Which I assume are not much stupider than their predecessors) also suggest that this is wrong.
I mean help me out here PP, it looks like the SAT severely over-estimates the IQ’s of those that take it.
Overestimates the official IQs of those who do well, but the corollary is it must underestimate those who do poorly.
although studies suggest the SAT correlates highly with conventional IQ tests, the degree of regression Ivy League students show suggests the correlation is mediocre. I’m planning another post on this very, very soon.
I guess the implication being that people who score exceptionally high on the SAT/GRE take your pick of academically-oriented pseudo IQ tests are perhaps not so clever as they believe, though they are exceptionally bright nonetheless.
https://fb-s-c-a.akamaihd.net/h-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-0/s261x260/15219384_582563581945084_6680988086342368604_n.jpg?oh=8c85fdc5962aa3fed9412cb2becd1d85&oe=58FAE186&__gda__=1488841050_5099eae7f515d4979bba863142fdddbb
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
translating… via google translat…ing
”I say nothing, i just shoot.”