For comments unrelated to my recent articles, The RISE and fall and RISE of brain SIZE, The genetic IQ and brain size of the 13 races, How smart was Homo Erectus?, and Estimating the IQ of Cro-Magnon Man from brain size and drawings, please post here.
Please feel free to post in this thread about any topic at all.
Leftoids aee The outer party via 1984 [b]romance.
the jewish propaganda on NPR.
http://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/
jews have no shame and no self-awareness.
The stereotype is that Jews are master manipulators, which implies good Theory of Mind, which implies good self-awareness.
On the other hand, there is a theory that Jews tend to have Asperger’s syndrome, which is consistent with their incredibly unique profile of high verbal, high math, and low spatial and with their historic inability to get along with other peoples.
But I doubt a high Asperger’s group could be so politically and culturally influential, unless their high level of general intelligence so negates any Theory of Mind deficits.
jared,
you’re making the FALSE assumption that the jews are just like everyone else, except that they are high, low, in the middle or whatever on various traits of the population in general.
1. psychology is a pseudo-science.
2. when psychology is used outside of a national group in a given time and place, it’s pseudo-science…
on top of…
pseudo-science.
those japs are so superior…
ROVE JET!
“psychology is a pseudo-science.”
One of the truest things ever said on this blog.
the problem with claiming that jews are self-aware when they do shows like the one above is that one will be called “paranoid”.
so i just assume jews do this and are totally unaware of their own bias.
the above one hour show on National Public Radio is just a means of saying, “free speech for all except ‘anti-semites’.” it’s just another means whereby jews in the media portray themselves as victims rather than what they really are in contemporary america. if it were intentional then the jews responsible wouldn’t be autistic, they’d be evil.
but not all jews are like this. gilad atzmon is self-aware.
so apparently was howard zinn to some extent at least.
The late historian Howard Zinn called Wiesel’s refusal to include the suffering of non-Jews at the hands of the Nazis at the Holocaust Museum, along with exhibits documenting Jewish suffering, one of the most “shameful moments” in recent memory. In that episode, Wiesel described the inclusion of the terrible affliction of non-Jews by the Nazis in the Museum as an attempt to “falsify reality” and that such calls were tantamount to “stealing the Holocaust from us.”
PP,
maybe it’s not exactly a full self awareness but partial, and partial self awareness, above the normie mean, i thought generally mean tons of psychopathy.
”“psychology is a pseudo-science.”
One of the truest things ever said on this blog.”
So what do you study psychology**
BUGabby said it thirty third time in this year…
Psychology is a pseudo-science, so why europeans become self-hating so quickly*
this arrogance and ignorance of many people on ”anti-system” sphere via nowhere is nonsense.
”The stereotype is that Jews are master manipulators, which implies good Theory of Mind, which implies good self-awareness.”
I thought to be great manipulators you need to be subtle thinkers and higher levels of theory of mind may implies in higher levels of emotional subtleties OR perceptiveness, 😉
Frankfurt skull or Tavistock institute to desconstruct the older order just
fractionate the overgeneralizations europeans and co. has been since a long time.
someone say
”apples are not oranges”
subtle thinkers can say
”but apples and oranges are fruits… they share a lot of common traits… it’s wrong, too simplistic to say apples are not oranges”.
”On the other hand, there is a theory that Jews tend to have Asperger’s syndrome”
You need choice, or joos have good theory of mind or joos ”tend to have asperger”.
I remember a comment by Hbd Chick saying that they are more prone to have ADHD. well, where some disorder other disorders will be more common than among neurotypical groups.
”which is consistent with their incredibly unique profile of high verbal, high math, and low spatial and with their historic inability to get along with other peoples.”
Autistics have problem with other people, on avg, not because they are nasty with them ,but the otherwise, i don’t know how common is this pattern.
Some people are so good that other not-so good people (normies) tend to look for them as a inferior breed or as prey.
where some disorder THERE other disorders will be more common than among neurotypical groups
culture = ancient bad use of psychology of the masses, 😉
given that “deplorables” can organize and can buy guns…
why haven’t they done anything yet?
the board rooms and davos and the congress and the president are defended…
weakly…
1,000 machine gun carrying deplorables could storm the state of the union and kill everyone inside.
why haven’t they done this yet?
(some puerto ricans did something similar once:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Capitol_shooting_incident_%281954%29)
because ultimately they’re all pussies.
“theory of mind” is jive made up by autistic people.
1. few people have any understanding, let alone theory, of THEIR OWN mind…especially autistics.
2. autistics are concentrated in psychology and psychiatry. they have zero understanding of their own mind, so little that they can make the assumption that everyone has a perfect understanding of his own mind…
and NOT see themselves making this assumption.
3. mind is NOT private. there is no my mind and your mind. there is only mind, full stop!
this is exactly what makes communication possible.
So many garbage…
i don’t where i could get…
”1. few people have any understanding, let alone theory, of THEIR OWN mind…especially autistics.”
source*
At the very moment that you are saying it, right from your navel, you do not understand how that your brilliant mind may be able to produce it.
Chama said:
”I’ve never met anyone in my life who could easily identify another person’s feelings, and I have met A LOT of people.
What kind of criteria is this?
People misunderstand one another ALL THE TIME, as a result of incorrectly identifying someone’s feelings, or not noticing the other person’s feelings at all.
I’ve learned that trying to guess another person’s feelings and reacting based upon that is almost always the wrong thing to do. I think most problems could be solved if people stopped thinking they were so freakin good at “mind reading” and instead actually asked others how they felt. This definition for empathy has got to be one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read.
–and if NT’s are supposedly so great at all this, then why is it that I’m misunderstood at every turn? Despite some awkward body language, and lack of eye contact, shouldn’t they be able to use this superpower-level empathy to figure out what autistics are feeling? It sounds fishy to me.”
http://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=252959&start=75
”This definition for empathy has got to be one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read. ”
I disagree in this part, but the rest of this comment is great, at least for me.
”2. autistics are concentrated in psychology and psychiatry. they have zero understanding of their own mind, so little that they can make the assumption that everyone has a perfect understanding of his own mind…”
Directly extracted from his navel. Most psychologists are not autistic.
”they have zero understanding of their own mind”
People who over-generalize without full knowledge of what they’re talking about, are generally considered stupid.
I wonder how many autistic people you must have lived *
”3. mind is NOT private. there is no my mind and your mind. there is only mind, full stop!”
So, my mind is your mind, and your mind is my mind**
So, your mind is the PP mind**
Or it was ”there is only mind… a universe mind…”
I honestly sometimes think pumpkin has the general knowledge of a mountain man sometimes.
To suggest jews are autistic is beyond stupidity. They are the exact opposite mostly. Bernie madoff, jordan belfort, steve wynn, sheldon adelson, that massive hollywood producer fraud person. I could list 200 well known jewish scammers, not to mention half of wall street. the inability to lie is a prerequisite to autism.
Of course the greatest lie of all its “race-ism”. Which our great grandparents wouldnt have even seen as an issue or intellectual had a concept for.
You can thank hollywood for your deep psyhological priming to curtsy at high test blacks no matter how many imes your windows are smashed.
Or open borders.
Zion controls your mind, your financial system, your politicians.
The only way to rid ourseves of the ILLUSION is to do what hitler tried initially. Make people aware of Zion and nothing more. Simple awareness would lead to the whole horror crashig down. An 80iq person can be remarkably rational about genetic slef interest without low verbal, autist feminine minded people blacklisting him from society as white trash.
With clarity we can have solutions.
To suggest jews are autistic is beyond stupidity. They are the exact opposite mostly.
When it comes to their Theory of Mind they’re the exact opposite of autistic, and since lack of Theory of Mind is the most defining autistic trait, I agree it’s stupid. But I understand why it’s a popular theory because when it comes to high verbal, high math, yet low spatial they do fit the Asperger profile, and like autistics, they’ve historically had trouble gaining social acceptance.
the inability to lie is a prerequisite to autism
No, the inability to lie WELL is a sign of autism. Autistics lie all the time, they just don’t realize how transparent their lies are. And they don’t realize when others are just PRETENDING to believing them.
”lack of Theory of Mind is the most defining autistic trait”
Lack**
Autistics tend to scores lower in theory of mind and not lack of it, i mean, seems the avg scores for theory of mind (neuro-typicals) is ~26, autistics tend to scores 2 points below, and not 0 scores.
people who score extremely lower in theory of mind tend to have severe mental retardation, seems.
Now we must to know if it’s a real feature in the real world. Many of this ”autistic” traits are not defined via neutral observation, analysis and judgment but based on neuro-typical mean, supposedly the ideal mean.
Just like if average iq 100 is the ”ideal mean” and avg IQ 130 is excessive or avg IQ 90 is hypo-sufficient.
”yet low spatial”
Some studies suggest many autistics no have low spatial IQ and even many aspies.
” and like autistics, they’ve historically had trouble gaining social acceptance.”
What is happening now. ”Jews” gaining ”social acceptance” but when people really start to throught out of matrix bubble they will perceiving that ”the jews” are not so perfectly perfect as the yellow propaganda showed.
I used the ”facial recognition mean” and not ”theory of mind”, well, similar.
Autists feel bad lying. Its not just lack of Daniel Day Lewis acting skill. I can’t figure out whether this is because their rule following-ity meant they took to the lying is bad line since pre-school quickly or because they are reflecting the traits of the uber-citizen that they were selected for, more generally.
Lying is a very R selected personality trait. By R selected I mean survival. Blacks lie almost habitually about everything. Hence “dindu nuffin”. East Asians lie least.
Lying is also associated more with females than males. Which could bolster the masculine brain theory of autism of Baron-Cohen.
But blacks are the most masculine race. East Asians the most feminine.
Maybe blacks don’t need to lie to survive when they have the majority, like Kinshasa can just beat their opponents brains out with a 2×4. Women have to lie to survive cos they have no physical strength and power.
“Masculine/feminine”. Definition needs updating. Words that don’t mean much no more ain’t got not use, damnit!!!. I recognise this as a genderqueer, binary, transfat, late jurassic period, cis-haemophiliac aborigine sha-man.
“Do you understand the words that-a coming out -a my mouth?”
That was what we call in the basement troll self-help community, a hole in one reference. Took me 2 seconds.
Where is my bevy of cocktail waitress that my blasian loins now require?
Ohhhh, that was a slam dunk from Pluto.
Donald Sterling – seemingly the only jew in america that didn’t get the memo on magic negroes.
I’m very “autistic” in this part because I don’t know or understand what is the rational value to lie. Of course there are such “white lies”, to lie considerably or not so to don’t hurt the feeling of other people.
To lie is like “create a stupid problem for you if the world is already populated by problems”. Less problem to be solved= better.
There are two types of deception in this perspective: Conscious and subconscious. People who cheat at conscious way generally they know what, why they are lying. And there are the people, very common, who lie having a subconscious understanding of his actions. Useful idiots, normies, many to most people are subconscious liars, invariably speaking.
Men lie more about circumstances and women lie more about themselves, or not, on avg of course. I don’t know if woken lie more, before i also think they lie more than men biit now i changed my point of view slightly.
Women lie more about people, men lie more about stuff and circumstances.
Just reading the end of the other thread.
Trump: Pair matching will be discredited in time. Sexual market liberalisation =harems. High iq women wabt muscularty and testosterone not phds in chemistry.
As for your list of donors, if people like jake sullivan and dan penor were asked which country theyd pick to take a first nuke from russia, they would say usa over israel. These people are “national security advisors”.
But they are foreign agents who should be executed for treason.
Just like racists are patriots.
Nsas are foreign agents.
Cuckolds are statesmen.
The alt rigt idea to bracket jews is a fairly blunt instrument. Not all jews are zionists. But its sadly the only way to keep chipping away at the illusion.
Msm is crumbling. Next the millitary will wake up. You never know. Maybe somebody will organise a joint base jump and let the jews throw all the blackmail files to the public. But calling all the call options simultaneously = system overload.
Maybe peole will actually think the blackmail is fake because jews fake some of the slime too nowadays.
All youll have to say in 15 years: The jews made up i banged my secretary. close the border.
Pump
if dark caucosoids are smart enough to keep expelling jews throught history, surely that deserve s genetic intelligence bonus?
That is the joke.
Mcbain, you suck.
Has to do with cro magnon, but not his iq so posting here.
Thankfully you don’t say the white nationalist canard of “cro magnons were the original whites” or whatever they say. Greg Johnson believes that garbage. Some “race-realist ‘. As Razib says, most of them are race-mythists. It’s funny how they get on others for identity politics when they do the same making myths to tug at heart strings. Most of them are hypocrites and don’t even genetics. Was arguing with some stormfront idiot the other day who was going on about Freya and light religion or something like that. He said the Aryans were from northern Europe. I showed Razib’s our magnificent Bastard Race post, this idiot links to some back water website that had outdated garbage. God, white nationalists make HBders as a whole loop bad because they just use it to push their agenda, facts be damned.
Like, do people really still believe the multiregional hypothesis today? To deny OoA, you’d have to deny tons of evidence and willingly go and look for what you want to be proven wrong. That’s not how science works but these retards don’t get it. White nationalists have to have low average intelligence. They believe the dumbest shit. It really is mind boggling.
Multiregional theory seems very partially correct. Humans came from Africa and they were colonizing other continents. Parallel to this, new human subspecies were appearing and those human beings who were colonizing these new lands ended up mixing with them. By now ”make sense” at least for me.
Freud’s Civilisation and Its Discontents is top level writing. A very heavy read on a flight, but intensely rich.
I haven’t read too much more of his works, but if this is anything to go by, his oeuvre is a goldmine. A very impressive mind indeed.
“the philosopher” is a concern troll.
freud was a jewish salesman obsessed with sex. really fucking obsessed. nothing more.
at least ron jeremy worked for it.
try reading this and then stfu:
Freud was a hack; people take him seriously?
Explain for us what you understand of this book** =)
preferably via topics and coerent language.
Santo is now the best commentator here, imho.
New Santo is better than Old Santo 🙂
maybe it has to do with a change in President…
RR-
Your comment should read;
“Freud was a fraud”.
Change**
Temer is the ex-president(o) of miss Roussev.
willie is retarded.
You’re retarded Moogabi,
explain for us what you understand of Heidegger masterpiece**
no cry.
No not trolling.
I never said I hated jews. Not all jews are zionists.
I daresay, zionists brainfuck prole Jews as much as whites. They wouldn’t have minded throwing them under the bus for the world domination gambit let’s just say. Gammas that they are.
(And those poor poor Ethiopian Jews).
I was going to write a clarification that his sexual animus theories are not necessarily wrong or right, just very hard to prove either way and so should be seen as conjectures. His passion in them is unwarranted, I agree. This may have been coloured by the fact most of his patients may have been sexually repressed being upper middle class Germanics.
I personally think though that there is something to the ‘penis envy’ theory (hence feminism) or his explanation of the formation of the anal personality type.
His analysis of the Pleasure principle and its methods of optimisation by people is very significant in this essay. And the evolution of the mind since childhood.
I have not read his other works. To be honest he could have dunked those pages in toilet water and published but we would still know something brilliant was lurking in there from this essay.
I was minded to call Freud a fraud myself due to his limited patient work, meagre results and small samples. It would be best to think of him kind of like a Charles Babbage in that field. It’s very rudimentary. Much looks outdated and plain stupid today. But the logic behind it is impressive.
We are creatures of our data input. The brain was hardly studied academically in those times.
In my experience, mental health understanding has not progressed terribly much since the 60s anyway even with stats and controlled experiments because psychology bans interesting experiments out of humane considerations and bans publishing results of natural interesting experiments like open borders out of “humane” considerations.
One reason why people brand psychology as a psuedo science is because it is forced to be to maintain the Illusion.
You see, if we were to understand, in a wider public fashion how the mind works, why we would understand the tools of the Extractors themselves! And that would be dangerous.
I’m pretty sure proper psychological experimentation takes place in dark bunkers in the desert. Let’s just say the people that worked on MK ULTRA and Northwoods under Dulles didn’t go into “implicit bias” research. Ahahahahahaha.
Read Sirhan Sirhan’s own account of his assassination of Bob Kennedy 30 years after being locked up…MK ULTRA was a success.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirhan_Sirhan
It is the unyielding intention of the gamma – in his priestly, journalist, propagandist and Extractor forms to control the minds of the populace. His holy grail will be to control the mind of alpha, schizo and genius without blackmail and bribery. How many thousands have simply disappeared in his quest for satanic knowledge?
”In my experience, mental health understanding has not progressed terribly much since the 60s anyway even with stats and controlled experiments because psychology bans interesting experiments out of humane considerations and bans publishing results of natural interesting experiments like open borders out of “humane” considerations.”
Other retarded ”ethics is a rock in the path of science”…
do you no have any drope of shame to call yourself ”philosopher”** any*
psychology and science never was totally dependend on ”experiments”…
before to do ”experiments” most of ”scientists” should/must use their ”privileged” analytical power, doing a sweep delaying the possibility to use real lives in their ”ethical” experiments, and not just by noble reasons but also to expand their knowledge and or understanding of the piece they are working… BUT NOT.
Name the 5 most referenced psychological experiments in psyc textbooks.
Now read the APAs ethics guidelines.
Now ask yourself if Zimbardo, Skinner et al could get funding for those things today.
P. Zimbardo:
“Hello. Thanks for your time ladies and gentleman of the grant committee. I’d like to lock up 5 students in a makeshift prison and make 5 guards. I want these people to be normies. I want them to have no criminal records. In fact I want them to know that there is no reason for locking them up. I want to videotape what happens. And for replicability, do it multiple times in other locations.”
“Committee: psychology and science never was totally dependend on ”experiments”…
before to do ”experiments” most of ”scientists” should/must use their ”privileged” analytical power, doing a sweep delaying the possibility to use real lives in their ”ethical” experiments, and not just by noble reasons but also to expand their knowledge and or understanding of the piece they are working… BUT NOT.
QED
… before the ”autistic” here i’m….
people who are too much ”experiment”-dependent are not smart enough to think for themselves FIRST, to use their neurons BEFORE to use and kill non-human animals and receive their ”academic titles” or to use humans as guinea pigs.
Your comment don’t make sense, the ethics is such thing that is not prevalent in sciences, specially in the ”scientific” experiments….
hello**
http://www.redebrasilatual.com.br/politica/2016/09/manifestacoes-por-todo-o-brasil-seguem-pedindo-por-fora-temer-4572.html/juiz-de-fora-temer/image_large
Leftists are trained (as a adorable dogs) or is just my impression *
It’s not pathological altruism.
It’s human training, stupid!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_training
michael moore endorses trump…
an example of how people can claim they are in-line, but their words betray them…
and how the dumb are for trump, the smart are for hillary,…
the very smart are for trump.
listening to this will likely cause willie to commit suicide…if he has a conscience.
Donald Trump is a racist bigot and a sexual predator. He should be behind bars.
please tell me that’s a joke.
the ovination of man ^^^^^^.
Why would it be? Trump is literally retarded.
yeah that’s it. that’s the ticket.
1. trump builds trump tower. trump recovers from bankruptcy.
2. trump has most popular tv show.
3. trump destroys all challengers to the GOP nomination with much less money.
and all this time he was “literally retarded”.
and, guy….I received my autosomal DNA test results this Monday.
94% European.
Middle East, Black, and Chinese admixture but no Ciboney/Amerind.
I suppose you were correct.
Yes. Trump isn’t smart, america is just stupid.
1. He goes bankrupt better than anyone else. The fact he even went bankrupt, and so quickly is a sign of his incompetence.
2. “Most popular show” is completely meaningless.
3. The GOP are retarded too.
Trump is like a Caucasian Oprah??? 😲
Trump has most popular tv show… Oprah level of brilliance
As Joey like to say
Wow
Not joking. I am Canadian and hate Trump. Everyone at my university hates Trump. I used to disagree but Ive realized Trump doesn’t have the right temperament. He’s unstable.
so you’re a young woman.
or a young man who wants the surgery.
i get it.
my guess is:
1. all the women accusing trump are lying.
2. all the women who’ve accused bill clinton are telling the truth.
when trump was younger he wasn’t bad looking and he’s 6’3″ and robust and he’s always been rich.
much more likely is the women were groping him.
Obviously the women are lying…..the ‘armrest’ defense of Katrina Pierson holds weight.
But if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Trump is the classical flamboyant super rich, buffon, he’s the Silvio Berlusconi of Uass… Hillári is different, she’s a sociopatic bitch, she’s extremely dishonest about herself, to say at least, while Trump, Trumpstein or not, is at least very sincere about himself, yup, he’s that buffon man you’re saying, transparent old guy with little general knowledge (sign of cosmopolitan intellectualitet)
Few people really know how crétin is the ”miss” Clinton.
University en masse is USELESS, the wrong thing to do, most part of people who ”study” in university is just to give to them their precious diploma and over-inflates their self-perceptions(deceptions).
School don’t learn nothing, even because most part of things we ”learn” just happen when we want… what we want ”to learn”.
The effect of education is nearly to same to the effect of psychotherapies…
without awareness of the patient, no have any progress.
”the same”
I judged Trump too hastily in the beginning.
He’s not bad when it comes to policy…
BUT
the man is unhinged.
Probably some super creative schizo the likes of which PP blogs about.
Not bad when it comes to policy? He’ll go if he to war with Iran for the Jews. I guess that’s not bad policy.
SOME policy ideas, I mean.
Yeah he’s a Neocon.
I don’t see why Mugabe and Philospher lick this guy’s boots.
*philosopher*
global warming demonstrates everything that’s wrong with she-male phonies like chomsky.
i heard some douche on bill maher say, “the earth hasn’t warmed since 2000.”
of course maher is a retard so he said, “whaaaaat?!”
1. the earth is in an ice age right now.
2. for most of earth’s history there have been NO glaciers except at the top of the highest mountains.
3. so the problem has nothing to do with “ruining the planet”. the problem, if there is one, is in the speed of the change…but whichever it is it is NOT a threat to human survival AT ALL.
4. in the late 70s many climate scientists were predicting a new ice age…how’s that?…wasn’t there LOTS of man made CO2 in the atmosphere by then?
5. BY FAR the biggest man made problem is…too many fucking people and all the farm land and ranch land they need to feed themselves…but except in africa even that is “on the mend”. brazil’s TFR is 1.81.
CHOMSKY’S EITHER SENILE OR JUST NOT VERY SMART.
Climate change is a fact. Whether it is human caused or not is irrelevant. We all have an obligation take care of the planet we live on.
what did i say? ah yes…
1. the earth is in an ice age right now.
2. for most of earth’s history there have been NO glaciers except at the top of the highest mountains.
worry about the concentration of power and one world government by unelected rich people.
don’t worry about global warming.
Why? It’s not like that’ll ever happen.
it has already pretty much happened fucktard.
How so?
it is the CEOs of large mulitnationals. the world bank. the imf. the us state department and military. trade agreements. absence of capital restrictions.
it’s not a conspiracy theory. it’s un-democratic, but it’s also distributed over thousands of people.
the free flow of capital. open borders, “free trade”, etc. make all but a few countries powerless, because their economies can be destroyed in a trice if they don’t get with the program.
james carville alluded to what really has become “the new world order”:
I used to think that if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the president or the pope or as a .400 baseball hitter. But now I would like to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.
the PRC, russia, iran, north korea are among the few remaining hold outs.
trump has only three policies. this is a common source of misunderstanding by the trump haters. immigration restriction and expulsion of illegals. renegotiation of trade agreements in the interest of american workers rather than profits. and the destruction of political correctness. the rest is just talk.
the significance of these policies and trump’s candidacy is greater than the policies themselves and greater than trump. these policies have majority support, but until trump, the professional politicians would intentionally minimize or never talk about them. the reason is that the american elite is very much against these policies.
that is, the significance of the trump campaign is that he has exposed for all those with eyes to see and who didn’t know it before…
the american ruling class does not have the interests of the american people at heart. the US is effectively an oligarchy in a war against its own population.
trump sounds more like chomsky than any politician except sanders.
he is the far left candidate. but trump haters are so fucking retarded they can’t see it.
Wealthy people will always rule the world, it is the disproportions that are….inexcusable. Trump is retarded he has no ability to articulate himself in an intellectual manner, and the logic he comes up with is akin to a grade schoolers, I don’t hate his politics necessarily, I just hate how dumb he has approached this entire election. What idiot didn’t already know about the disproportionate wealth? What, you think somewhere there is a room full of rich people rubbing their hands in an evil way and laughing maniacally?
It isn’t a conspiracy it’s just greed doing what greed does best. Trump is too stupid to be liberal. We needed a liberal trump not a conservative one.
“What, you think somewhere there is a room full of rich people rubbing their hands in an evil way and laughing maniacally?”
Yes.
The cringe.
It’s obviously an oversimplification, but to not believe that there is a small cabal of ultra rich people screwing over us (goyim) is very hard to believe. History tells us as much.
How the hell does it do that?
“In the Western world until the 19th century, the largely Christian populations obeyed a religiously-motivated prohibition on charging interest on loans, with the role of banker historically falling on Jewish businessmen who were sometimes even specifically licensed by sovereigns to charge interest. To assume that the disproportionate number of Jews involved in finance proves they’re engaging in a Zionist conspiracy through manipulation of capitalism is to ignore the historic role of Jews in banking due to the Christian prohibition against usury. This is reflected in Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice” where the villain Shylock is a Jewish money lender demanding the exorbitant price of a pound of flesh for defaulting on his loan”
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/International_Jewish_conspiracy
”Rational” weakpaedia is pure bullshit with some sparsed correct statements, the rest is just like to read ”Che Guevara newspeak”.
not really, they’re just very liberal
Santo, correct.
Melo, >Wikipedia
It’s true that Jews are disproportionately involved in financing, see Cochran, Hardy, and Harpending, “A Natural History of Jewish Intelligence”. However, the coup during 1913 proves my point. The rich are disproportionately Jews. The Jews screw over the goyim in goyim countries (their host countries). That’s part of the reason why Jews were selected for higher intelligence in short period of time. In the series “Brainwash” Cochran goes through how this change occurred.
But the fact remains, Jews are overrepresented and nepotism is the cause. They screw over goyim all the time, which has lead to their expulsion in over 100 locations in 1800 years, and will occur again once the goyim know.
It’s not that they screw over goys they screw over anyone not jewish, and it still doesn’t confirm a conspiracy it’s just a combination of greed and EGI.
No, santo is not correct, rational wiki is incredibly accurate. You, him and others like you only disregard it because of it’s liberal focus.
You haven’t inspected the totality of the evidence so it’s weird you are so confident. You realize there is a scientific consensus on global warming right? And it’s overwhelming. Btw the global cooling thing was a a fringe theory even in the 70s.
can you read?
try it some time.
read what i wrote.
You realize there is a scientific consensus on global warming right? And it’s overwhelming.
you realize that saying that makes you retarded? right?
do you even know what science is? have you ever met a scientist?
since “the sky is falling” bullshit, climate science funding has increased by 10x.
science in the US, at least, is professors applying for grants and publishing so they can get tenure and gain status.
most scientists are morally retarded sheeple.
”since “the sky is falling” bullshit, climate science funding has increased by 10x.”
because most scientists are morally retarded sheeple… climate change caused by anthropomorphic reasons is wrong*
”science in the US, at least, is professors applying for grants and publishing so they can get tenure and gain status.
most scientists are morally retarded sheeple.”
in this part i agree, because it’s obvious.
I’m going to dissect your post point by point
1. the earth is in an ice age right now.
– Bullshit, unsubstantiated claim
2. for most of earth’s history there have been NO glaciers except at the top of the highest mountains.
– doesn’t matter. What matters is the earth is getting warmer.
3. so the problem has nothing to do with “ruining the planet”. the problem, if there is one, is in the speed of the change…but whichever it is it is NOT a threat to human survival AT ALL.
– Not sure. Jury is still out but it’s probably bad for a large percentage of the population. Certainly the threat isn’t imminent per se but our grand children will suffer at least in some parts of the world.
4. in the late 70s many climate scientists were predicting a new ice age…how’s that?…wasn’t there LOTS of man made CO2 in the atmosphere by then?
– Bullshit. More were writing about global warming than about global cooling in the 70s. It’s a myth what you wrote.
5. BY FAR the biggest man made problem is…too many fucking people and all the farm land and ranch land they need to feed themselves…but except in africa even that is “on the mend”. brazil’s TFR is 1.81.
– overpopulation is a problem and it ties in nicely with global warming and is even cause of the latter.
FUCKTARD!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age
Within a long-term ice age, individual pulses of cold climate are termed “glacial periods” (or alternatively “glacials” or “glaciations” or colloquially as “ice age”), and intermittent warm periods are called “interglacials”….ice age implies the presence of extensive ice sheets in both northern and southern hemispheres.[1] By this definition, we are in an interglacial period—the Holocene—of the ice age that began 2.6 million years ago at the start of the Pleistocene epoch, because the Greenland, Arctic, and Antarctic ice sheets still exist.
overpopulation is a problem. it’s the ONLY problem.
if the earth had as many as it did in 1 AD, everyone could fly his own jet and the planet would be no worse for it.
Not sure.
fucktard. you’re saying humans couldn’t live in a world as warm as the world has been for most of its history.
so dinosaurs could live in a much warmer world, but humans couldn’t?
#autism hurts.
“Though some temperatures during that period were in the same range as today, they were confined to the northern hemisphere and the summer months.
What’s more, the cause is understood (orbital forcing similar to what controlled the Ice Ages), just as today’s cause is understood (CO2 emissions), and these causes are very different. NOAA has a page on this that contains the following quote:
In summary, the mid-Holocene, roughly 6,000 years ago, was generally warmer than today, but only in summer and only in the northern hemisphere. More over, we clearly know the cause of this natural warming, and know without doubt that this proven “astronomical” climate forcing mechanism cannot be responsible for the warming over the last 100 years.
As an aside, it’s worth noting that even if the Holocene had been as warm as or warmer than today, it would do nothing to undermine the theories and data that indicate today’s warming is rapid and anthropogenic.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Concurring
Earth is most definitely in an ice age right now. It’s when both the caps are covered in ice. They’re melting because we’re coming out of the ice age.
That’s so trivial. It doesn’t advance your argument at all lol. It’s just semantic wordplay
The bottom line is the earth is getting warmer every year and this has deleterious consequences for a great percentage of our population.
Everything else is irrelevant!
Oh one more thing…
Earth is getting warmer due to human activity!
That’s it!
Why don’t any of these climate models use THE SUN as a variable and ONLY human activity? Seems kinda strange to leave out the Sun as a variable, dont you think?
The sun is irrelevant. Didn’t the whole in the Ozone layer close up? Seems kind of strange that the only climate change denialists are uneducated conservatives.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_warming
”3. so the problem has nothing to do with “ruining the planet”. the problem, if there is one, is in the speed of the change…but whichever it is it is NOT a threat to human survival AT ALL.”
welcome to Kiribati…
How long the island or archipelago of Kiribati has emerged from the waters*
– doesn’t matter. What matters is the earth is getting warmer.
and why does that matter?
The process of global warming is bad not just because of the temperature change.
http://www.climatehotmap.org/global-warming-effects/health.html
here’s another example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_forests_of_the_Cretaceous
I have a highly analytical mind…
Everyone shut the fuck up
I just got raped
Holly shit
It was bad
It was really really bad
What the fuck am I supposed to do now?
Call the cops. l
They wont do anything. The men who raped me are way too powerful. The cops only punish the poor and powerless.
I’m going to have to deal with this shit my own way.
And the best part is, it’s all going to be fucking legal
I got a 170 IQ.
They FUCKED with the WRONG BITCH!
Literally.
marsha is hilarious.
how exactly does one rape a whore?
Lmfao mugabe hit that shit on the head. What an obvious ploy for attention XD
how exactly does one rape a whore?
The same way one rapes anyone else, you evil, moronic, sub-human piece of shit.
I hope you burn in hell, but something tells me, you’re already there.
let’s do it marsha.
it’ll be deep and wide…
oh believe me!
Oh my God what happened?
I got invited to a party.
But not just any party, this was the FUCKING ASSHOLES who run in New York city and the world.
I’m talking billionaires, FUCKING politicians, big media, all the ASSHOLES you FUCKING worship
And yet not a single man in the room turned me on sexually, so I go to the balcony to have a cigarette (I’ve started smoking again)
BIG MISTAKE
Three HUGE guys follow me out
BIG GUYS
BIG BIG BIG FUCKING GUYS
BIG GUYS ALWAYS HANG OUT IN PACKS
Now I’m a big girl
6’3″ and 200 lbs, and in heels I’m taller than God
But these guys made me feel TINY
They must have been 6’8″ and 400 lbs,
So one of them says to me “are you working tonight?”
Someone must have told them I was a prostitute, don’t know who
I told him “Fuck off. I don’t FUCK low IQ corporate MBA gorillas”
“Oh yeah,” he says, and I see him pulling down his pants and underwear to rape me, and I walk over and headbutt him to the floor, and that’s when his two friends tackled me, and before I knew it, all three of them were FUCKING raping me
And the most disgusting part was, some of the people in the party saw what was going on.
THESE ARE THE MOST POWERFUL FUCKING PEOPLE IN THE FUCKING WORLD
And instead of helping me, they stepped on to the balcony and watched
THEY FUCKING WATCHED AS I LAY THERE SCREAMING AND CRYING
The people who run the World are not the high IQ geniuses you portray them as, they’re FUCKING MONSTERS!!!!!!!!!!
YOU FUCKING BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After I fuck these guys over I’m getting out of this fucking city
Time for some possum living.
”What the fuck am I supposed to do now?”
To confess to a priest….
Trump is correct.
Donald Trump is a left wing seizure in the plutocrat system. He would be assassinated if he became president like Kennedy or ousted in a coup like Nixon, because its clear they can’t blackmail him or brainwash him.
We always laugh at places like Russia and China that are brazenly plutocratic. Do you know that most of the people in those countries don’t even see it? Look at Western polling of Putin or Xinping’s approval ratings. Even most North Koreans don’t see it.
They have an ILLUSION there too.
You may even argue they are more populist because they serve their genetic brothers…hence the popularity ratings. Wanna guess how Hillary would poll? Or Blair? Or Cameron? Or Merkel by Russian/Chinese pollsters?
Our Extractors are if not more psychopathic and conniving, then at least the only major world power axis who serve a foreign tribe (Israel).
1. 9-11 was an inside job by Mossad, the House of Saud and the necon/cuckold establishment for Israeli lebensraum in the Middle East. There are many demolition experts including the American civil engineering association that have published reports questioning the official 9-11 Commission narrative. WTC 7 was demolished on its own without a plane hit. The pentagon attack was not a plane. A photo taken 20 mins after the attack shows no plane debris. http://911review.com/attack/pentagon/
2. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a hoax that lead to Vietnam and Agent Orange on children. Ellsberg discolsed this.
3. The early 2000s anthrax scare was a hoax traced back to CIA labs (and the story was buried).
4. Our media is a pretty decrepit propaganda system that Goebbels would have felt was unsophisticated for the 30s. Bernays would be disgusted. Read Ron Unz series of essays.
5. The Blank Slate is a hoax to protect the Extractors (who are mostly jewish) from race pogroms.
6. Rac-ism is a hoax. All tribes act in their self interest. That is the natural order. The zionists understand this. Hence the blood only citizenship and wall around their country.
7. Iraq War WMD is a fraud.
8. Most W European “mainstream” politicians are not allowed talk about immigration because the plan is to eliminate the white voter. Tony Blair’s senior advisor wrote about this in a book last year.
9. The EU is a plan for a USA of Europe to make control easier. It has never protected anyone from war. Nuclear weapons has. They are explicit about this if asked directly.
10. Al Qaeda and ISIS are funded by the House of Saud (Wikileaks). Saud in turn funds Netanyahu (wikileaks) in Israeli elections. We can conclude that Saud, Zion, and the compromised WASPS in the West run the Western axis of global power.
11. Tax havens could be banned tomorrow without much military hassle. They exist for Extractors to avoid taxation. (about 1/3 of global wealth is offshore – read Treasure Islands book). That’s why Hilter avoided invading Switzerland even though it had untold treasures.
12. The plan is a global government, indirect or directly, under Zion. None of the elites protest this in closed rooms. The CFR is pretty much a Kafkaesque version of how the “ruling council of the elders of Zion” would look i.e. 70% zionist ashkenazi jew.
13. Population growth in Africa is a bigger problem than global warming. Trumplypse is right that overpopulation causes all environmental problems fundamentally. The absolute worst place in the world to have this problem is in Kinshasa. In time, many places in Europe will resemble Detroit, Rio, or Capetown. I would be more worried by rape as a woman than water levels. As a man I would be more worried of the Struggle of The Will.
14. We can still turn this around. Donald Trump has changed so much in just 7 months. Their illusion is fading.
15. Be thankful. You have been born in interesting times.
16. Snowden relates that they really do want to monitor our minds. You see our emails, videos we watch and like, messages, browsing…are our thoughts. The supercomputer was built to control your minds. In time minority report will be possible, people like me will just, disappear. Everyone will be bred to become an ant person, like in East Asia.
17. Their favoured attack is sexual defamation – Assange, Holland, Strauss Kahn, Spitzer, Trump, and in time, you should you protest against Zion.
I have cracked it. Add your own observations to this list.
”15. Be thankful. You have been born in interesting times.”
bullshit.
this times is not different than others… the same idiocracy.
moral and intellectual idiots in the power.
Why not look at morals from an evolutionary perspective? Why does it have to be from philosophy? EO Wilson said in Sociobiology that morality will be taken from philosophers for the time being and be biologicized. That’s already happening now. If we can explain morality with biology, why not do so?
They are not idiots.
There are degenerates, paedophiles, cuckolds, traitors, psychopaths, rapists, criminals, hypnotists, warmongers…but not stupid.
I daresay they’ve been too successful. American white men are now mostly obese, low testosterone, discriminated against in academia/work/culture and pumped with drugs and schlock culture even though they built the country.
The Narrative of reality is reversed completely!
They’ve managed to turn Martin “depraved sex addict” L King into a “national hero” (to low T whites more than blacks almost). MLK had probably a 105 IQ with his sociology degree from Crozier College and profession as preacher. Without (((white media)))), he would be forgotten. He plagiarized his PHD…..in theology.
HE IS THE ORIGINAL MAGIC NEGRO.
An archetype by which the HIVE was to copy and paste Morgan Freeman into every movie, every black man with an IQ over 100 into every workplace, and his rise preceded the crime wave of the 70s-90s. He is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FRAUD PERPETUATED ON THE PSYCHE OF THE CIVILIZED. HE IS A JOKE OF ZION ON THE GENTILE.
He also has the eyes of a paranoid schizo like me. So I have some empathy with his blight. Zion figured he was more useful as a martyr than a closet communist with a deplorable sexual history waiting to be unearthed.
Happy Martin Luther King Day.
Let’s abolish all white men from the constitution. Ahahahahahah.
Golly gee Billy, I guess I’m on fire today, huh?
Our Blasian fruitcake leaves off one important aspect of Dr. King;
Oration ability/charisma.
Regardless of he wrote the speeches, his delivery was awe inspiring. Blacks are, according to Rushton, more outgoing. Hence, despite low IQs, Blacks do WELL as entertainers. Not a “magic negro” or an evil Jew effect.
*regardless of if he wrote*
Will, yep. Negros are more extroverted, East Asians are more introverted, whites in the middle, in my opinion skewing a bit more towards introversion.
Then there is the fact of the correlation between intelligence and extroversian and introversion. High IQ populations are more introverted while it’s the reverse for extroverted populations.
”Why not look at morals from an evolutionary perspective? ”
Why not look for more than one perspective and choice for the best*
I agree Santo. There is no reason why the evolutionary thought of morals could be correct as well as the philosophical kind of morality.
The fact we are animals don’t mean we tend to be irrational animals, even most part of time most of us act irrational ways.
Unfortunately many to most people who are more morally-leaning are not quite rational.
is david rockefeller senile (he’s 101) or has he lost his power over the cfr?
why would he allow this absurd over-representation of jews?
American white men are now mostly obese, low testosterone, discriminated against in academia/work/culture and pumped with drugs and schlock culture even though they built the country.
but according to the HBD shills like peepee, it’s all “genetic”. never mind that these people were NOT fat and low t 50 years ago. never mind that “diversity is our strength” really means “kill white men”. never mind that what you get as a result is that a greater and greater fraction of white men in positions of power are effeminate. never mind. never mind. down the memory hole.
HBDers do the work of the jews, and they don’t even know it. pathetic and despicable.
they don’t know it, but they are doing it.
Some HBDers are indeed useful idiots for the very political movements THEY oppose, especially those who invoke very recent evolution making whites the way they are.
I prefer models based on very ancient evolution
if they’d use the word…
“globalist” would be as black a label as “racist”.
the problem with globalism is…
1. if the global leaders get it wrong there’s no recourse…political diversity is always better than uniformity…even if it leads to wars…even if a lot countries suck…
2. global government, by its very nature, CANNOT be democratic.
for those who get it the above video…who’s the enemy?
the globalists.
“globalist” should be pejorated. it should be an INSULT.
it’s got nothing to do with trump himself.
trump-ism is the exact opposite of a “cult of personality”.
“Entertainer”.
Good.
The civil rights movement was more about Jews getting into boardrooms and country clubs than about the blacks and their right to learn calculus, side by side with white children.
When the Illusion starts fading, you will all look back on MLK as a kind of perverted joke.
Possibly as perverted as the beatings he inflicted on women and his crony’s gang rapes.
There must have been 15000 black preachers like him in the South before him. But he had purdy mouth and a (((megaphone)))).
****
Purty soon you peoples is gonner realise who the real baaaad guys are. And they ain’t the nice white protestants with their groomed hair, their line dancin and their NGOS in Africa, an OCD, no sireee bob!
They’the people with long noses and thin lips with greasy faces and the big black loud people with angry sadistic feelins.
Ur huh. Yep, 1/3 of black men are either are or were or will be in prison, on parole, awaiting trial or at large. It ain’t much better in Brazil, Africa, Europe or the Carribean either.
Oohhh say it aint so, mister! Didn’t (((Hollywood)))) tell me they is all like, magical? And if we gave them enough lovin and cash, they would be theoretical phys-cists and and, arty professors? You mean to say people’s minds look exactly as they are?!! Gosh, why, that would mean nature made it easy for us, huh?
Thats not what they taught us in school!!
But honey….who taught you in school…..who taught you in school. Who wrote your textbooks. Who approved them? Who….
Honey, aesthetics don’t lie. Otherwise we’d be…. well we’d be all dead!!!! Hahahah.
***
Trust autopilot. Override your weak narrative functions.
He won’t let you down even if he’s been drugged and suppressed since your childhood with your “education”, he’s still better than joining a Jim Jones cult.
He’s the expert. Hundreds of thousands of years. Satisfaction guaranteed. No kool aid with arsenic.
“recent evolution making whites the way they are.”
Racial phenotypes are recent.
http://www.unz.com/gnxp/our-magnificent-bastard-race/
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/130423-european-genetic-history-dna-archaeology-science/
Talking about anything past 6500 ya is a different breeding population.
Don’t confuse phenotype with breeding population. The morphology for some races is WAY WAY older than 6500 years.
RR- exactly.
I was just trying to point out that if extroversion and ability to be a great orator are correlated, than in an odd way, IQ and oration abilities are negatively correlated.
Black over representation in media is probably explained by this.
Philosopher-
Beverly Hills is 60% Jewish….you are correct about Hollywood deserving brackets.
But personality of a host is also key in ratings, obviously.
Hence assuming they’re anti-White and hate us, they’d pick a Black over all the other types of non-Whites, and Blacks do a good job,….it would seem, I believe PP did a pie chart showing they were over represented as TV pundits, and such.
sorry for the word salad.
I must be a schizo too it seems 🙂
Blacks get oscars for being black.
Denzel Washington has played the same role for 40 years.
Can you imagine Denzel playing a retarded southerner with his box of chocolates?, a gay lawyer or a frat house jerkboy?
Most blacks play blacks in movies. What I mean by this is: the role is in essence a black man role (black women are absent in movies)
Blacks get tv presenting jobs because they’re gregarious and extroverted. That’s a fair point which I accept. They are also naturally talented comedians.
But Hollywood movie and TV shows keep pushing black physicists, wise old men, loyal comrades and other numbnut stuff when the reality is 1/3 of black men are going to be in a jumpsuit on some occasion. That is a shocking stat reality most people are totally unaware of.
Making supergirl’s boyfriend black was the last straw. The same with Star Wars.
The message: Black man replaces white man as sexual option.
The reality: Many white people are victims of black crime.
Now you know why Will Smith’s career is in big trouble because they can’t cast him as a leading man with a white woman without the movie tanking from disgusted cinemagoers sick of Zion’s creepy obsession with destroying white men. The Birth of a Nation got the same revenue as some indie college age flick recently.
Zion’s black iron battering ram is turning into a rubber dildo.
“Don’t confuse phenotype with breeding population. The morphology for some races is WAY WAY older than 6500 years.”
This doesn’t mean that Europeans or East Asians are any older than 6500 years old. Even then, as I’ve shown from Peter Frost (except he’s off by 4k years), they didn’t become a distinct breeding population until after the last glacial maximum. I have a paper on “Natives” where in the middle of the abstract it talks about how Asians shared a common ancestor with Europeans on the Y chromosome. Hmmm… Anyway, the modern races are recent as are the phenotypes we racially code. Just because the morphology existed before doesn’t mean the races did!! That doesn’t mean that Africans are any older either, because they aren’t!
Extroverts tend to be overconfident, over-proud, over-stubborn…
A kind of cool psychosis ”or” megalomania…
the problem itself is not to be over-confident, or over-proud…
it’s you’re not factually/morally correct about it and be irrationally nasty with other people = usually among extroverted…
Introverts are not so good than extroverts because some of the great advantages to be extroverts are considerably lost in this case…
the best is to be ambiverted, but the problem, as usual among human psyque is that most of intermediary profiles are very correlated with mental disorders.
The price of the spiritual emancipation is usually high among quite self-aware creatures.
”They are not idiots.
There are degenerates, paedophiles, cuckolds, traitors, psychopaths, rapists, criminals, hypnotists, warmongers…but not stupid.”
Correcting ”morally idiot”
and it have nothing to do with hypocritical religious puritanism.
personality: character, self-steem and temperament.
character is central.
”I daresay they’ve been too successful. American white men are now mostly obese, low testosterone, discriminated against in academia/work/culture and pumped with drugs and schlock culture even though they built the country.”
Suckers.
”The Narrative of reality is reversed completely!”
The narrative of conservative reality, you want to mean.
The real narrative of reality is a combination of all political/ideological spectrum.
”They’ve managed to turn Martin “depraved sex addict” L King into a “national hero” (to low T whites more than blacks almost). MLK had probably a 105 IQ with his sociology degree from Crozier College and profession as preacher. Without (((white media)))), he would be forgotten. He plagiarized his PHD…..in theology.
HE IS THE ORIGINAL MAGIC NEGRO.”
A fabricated (anti-)hero of (((media))).
”An archetype by which the HIVE was to copy and paste Morgan Freeman into every movie, every black man with an IQ over 100 into every workplace, and his rise preceded the crime wave of the 70s-90s. He is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FRAUD PERPETUATED ON THE PSYCHE OF THE CIVILIZED. HE IS A JOKE OF ZION ON THE GENTILE.”
I agree.
”He also has the eyes of a paranoid schizo like me. So I have some empathy with his blight. Zion figured he was more useful as a martyr than a closet communist with a deplorable sexual history waiting to be unearthed.”
You already was diagnosed*
Wow. Just wow.
A lot has happened in my life in the last 2-3 months, so I don’t really have the chance to comment here anymore. Nonetheless, I think this blog may go down in the history of Internet as the most important blog ever.
The level of discussion in the comments sections, while occasionally unhinged and incoherent, discusses the most important things in the world today. I approve of the Trump/election commentary. And the unhinged nature of the proceedings are actually a thing of beauty. And unlike the other alt-right sites, these discussions are discussed in the context of the most important variable of human performance: IQ. So much of the discussion here would go completely over the heads of my friends/family, even the really, really smart ones, and I like that, too.
I just love the fact that so many taboos are broken here in the name of the truth. It brings a tear to my eye. The only other blogs that really come close (and are updated regularly) are Robert Lindsay’s blog and Lion of the Blogosphere. And Robert Lindsay is a redacted so I don’t comment there.
insult against Robert redacted by PP, oct 28,2016
You consider this site “alt right”?
Actually, alt-right probably isn’t the right term for Pumpkin. But most websites that openly allow commenters to express nationalistic/racial supremacist/EGI doctrines I include as alt-right.
See the comments in the following post: http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/06/what-is-neo-reaction.html. People seem to have varying definition of what the alt-right is, and some even conflate it with “Neo-reaction”. I think the both “alt-right” and “neo-reaction” are very ambiguous terms.
Well I consider the alright, for lack of a bigger term “neonazi”, pro-white, ultra nationalist and, from what I see, hating other races.
Look at that dolt Richard Spencer. “Muh Europe is a nation”. Ha! Sure buddy, ignore all the wars. He says he hopes to see Europe “never fighting with each other. To never fight other Europeans”. Yea pal, change human nature. Most of these altright types use da feelz instead of facts. Most altright types have extreme confirmation bias and don’t follow the data, they only follow their feelings to data that will reinforce their idiotic, untrue, and as Razib says, myth-making notions.
That makes sense. And that’s why I like Pumpkin, HBD Chick, Jayman, Razib, West Hunter, etc.- they focus on the facts of human evolution, not non-white hatred.
Same here. I don’t really concern myself with the aut-right. They mostly have no idea about human evolution. They believe Europeans have been European since 40kya, except the modern European phenotype coalesced recently, about 6500 ya. All the racial types we code are recent.
They use the data for their agenda; I read this stuff to learn more about how we evolved and why we do the things we do due to how we evolved. I don’t let politics drive my research into human evolution.
Sorry, that stab at Robert Lindsay was because I’m kinda pissed off I’m still banned there.
why were you banned?
Your economic views?
You’re one of the most tame commentators here.
I had to redact that. But I’m so honored you’re enjoying the discussions we all have here
Though don’t praise this blog too much. Misdreavus and Mugabe already think you’re my sock puppet, which I take as a huge complement given your outstanding verbal IQ.
I’ve banned myself from Lion. Lion is jewish and never allows me to comment on politics with reference to Zionists. He mods anything I say about the media, donors, geopolitics, neconservatives, the economy etc etc.
Its like talking about anime without reference to Japan on his blog.
me too.
he posts some comments and not others and the dividing line is NOT when it’s about the jews or not.
apparently, like you, he’s just a concern troll.
as a result his commenters are all prole morons.
Yeah that’s my only problem with Lion. He encourages provocative theories about every ethnic group but his own
He’s getting better at allowing some criticism of his people, but he relentlessly defends even the mildest critiques
I always know someone’s criticized Jews when I see Lion is active in the comment section
Got a specific link? I love watching Jews try to defend Jews, it’s funny because there’s really no defending it once the goyim do really know.
lion is a retard.
in his post today he says he’s selling all his stocks.
has he never heard of selling ES, buying ZB, buying puts on SPY, buying calls on TLT…
think of the commissions he’s wasting. what a retard.
and he bought some shitty consumer robot company rather than FANUC as his bet on automation.
lion proves not all jews know money.
PP you’d enjoy this.
https://aryanskynet.wordpress.com/2016/10/28/the-devils-marxists/
Please consider a post estimating the IQ of Oliver Stone. There’s a lot about him that really stands out as being indicative of a towering intellect.
His Nixon biopic was great.
From my perspective, Natural Born Killers and JFK stand out as his best work. But I’ve enjoyed pretty much everything of his that I’ve seen. I hold him in very high regard as a director and in even higher regard as an intellectual.
My opinion of him as an intellectual is based on the interviews where he discusses American history and geopolitics. He’s kind of the opposite of a typical American political pundit in that he has no obvious allegiances to a political party, despite identifying as a progressive. And as a director, he remains a pure dramatist to the point of it obscuring his own political views at times. Liberals criticized him for making Bush too sympathetic a character in W. but he says in this interview that he hates Bush intensely and was very depressed during his presidency. It says a lot about him that he never allows his biopics of unsympathetic characters to be pure hatchet jobs.
I also like that he’s a Jew who criticizes Israel and the American Jewish lobby. To use your own example of a pass/fail IQ test, this reveals a certain intellect in its own right: he sides with the powerless as opposed to the powerful. That’s the essence of a social liberal, no doubt.
stone’s dad was a jew. his mom was a gentile. just like kasparov. (“kasparov” is a russified version of his mother’s armenian name “kasparian”.)
in america the half jews are both given license to criticize jews and are more likely to do so as being jewish is not always part of their identity.
http://www.rockco.com/who-we-are#
Look at this Trumpy.
I don’t know if these bios firm names ring a bell if you aren’t from the industry.
Looking at their CVs, its safe to say this a crack team managing “$3bn” in assets for David Rockefeller’s family office and “a few endowments”.
But this team looks more like they are selected to manage hundreds of billions in assets.
The CEO is also a Rothschild Cap Management adviser.
And lo…
http://www.ritcap.com/non-executive-director-profiles
This board has the Duke of Wellington, the founder of London’s largest wealth management network, the LSE accounting professor as CFO, the former Merrill Lynch CEO, and its investment team is also a crack team, managing “a few billion”.
Rockefeller isn’t senile. Why do you think he went into banking instead of oil like his grandfather? What do you need to be successful in banking? Hint: Be friendly with jews.
JPM’s CEO knows how this game is played. Married a jewess. Or marry your daughter off to jews like Trump and Hilary did. Blood is the tie that binds.
http://listverse.com/2014/11/26/10-royal-families-riddled-with-incest/
Now imagine if Jews were banned from banking. Maybe the CFR wouldn’t be so Zionist.
And Ivanka would be married to a WASP.
and yet hitler and his party and their great popularity prior to the war is “explained” by…
populism!
can’t have the people deciding, ’cause the people are stupid hicks. they might not like the jews.
and henry ford is explained how? he was an idiot. just like trump. right?
it’s funny how savages in melanesia are derided for their taboos and cargo cults when the US has many taboos and everyone is working for money, not working to produce.
the biggest taboo in america even has its own latinate six syllable word…
an-ti-sem-i-tis-m.
one might have thought that following their extermination in europe the jews would have learned.
but they didn’t learn, because the jews are not conspiring much more than any parasitic infection conspires to kill its host.
how smart can an infection be?
the case of rabies is very interesting.
1. rabies without immediate treatment is the deadliest infection there is.
2. it can take years to develop after entering the body.
3. later the animal cannot swallow without paroxysms of the throat, thus saliva carrying the virus builds up in the mouth.
4. the animal is violent once the virus has reached its brain and thus likely to bight all comers.
5. thus the virus has evolved a means of controlling its host’s behavior in such a way as to ensure its own propagation.
the rabies virus does not conspire.
one might have thought that following their extermination in europe the jews would have learned
Oh but they did learn, at least if you believe Kevin MacDonald. They learned Jews are much safer in multiethnic societies which might partly explain why Jews outside of Israel tend to be more racially liberal than WASPs, even controlling for IQ, I suspect.
Not all of course. Many Jews are racially conservative. They’re a diverse people like every other.
this dog’s mind is no longer his own:
What do you think of Steven Pinkers response to Macdonald?
please give a link.
i find pinker nauseating. he’s another example of the jewish stereotype.
and macdonald is a simpleton.
and macdonald is a simpleton
When it comes to Jews you agree with him on almost everything.
Mugabe here.
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/pinker.htm
That’s Kevin’s response in there as well in red. I love Pinker. Great writer. But he denies racial iq differences, yet wrote a book called the Blank Slate. I find it hard to believe someone who champions Jewish intelligence doesn’t believe that the black-white IQ gap is genetic. I think he’s doing it to protect his cushy job at Harvard. He has to know the truth.
when it comes to jews i don’t agree with macdonald on anything.
psychology is just astrology and evolutionary psychology is even worse.
it does seem very odd that the richest man in the history of the world…according to Forbes…
john davison rockefeller…
was worth $300b inflation adjusted in 1900…
yet his grandson david is supposedly worth only $3b.
that was some MASSIVE bad investments…
or it’s a LIE.
If I recall Forbes’s method of adjusting wealth was to adjust for size of GDP at the time the person lived. They were criticised for NOT simply adjusting for inflation. When the latter is done, Gates is the richest of all time, which makes sense given his 170 IQ (1590 old SAT).
i doubt “the philosopher” is black but his use of the term “jumper” to mean “sweater” and his familiarity with finance and banking suggest strongly that he is british and may have worked in The City at one point.
getting a job in high finance isn’t nearly as hard for a brit as it is for an american, because the british economy is so dominated by finance.
It is for
(a) the son of a mildly intellectually disabled soldier with no secondary education
(b) the son of a woman with no primary education and intense schizo mental illness
(c) who is also not British
(d) a paranoid schizophrenic himself.
I’m not black. I have said that 14 times already. Someone of my profile was never going to be black. How can you not figure that out by my image choice and verbal style. Even high level blacks don’t write like this.
If I could put a steel electric fence around Africa I would.
Read this Trumpy:
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/08/explosive-q-on-clinton-foundation-fbi.html
Is this FBI informer legit?
I won’t say anything to bias your analysis. It’s a long read. You will not want to stop.
This is a very informative thread, much knowledge I’ve deduced myself from general knowledge.
i’m the one who’s always said you weren’t black…guy!
but i haven’t read all your comments, so far all i knew peepee wasn’t making it up.
so it’s clear that peepee not only has an IQ of 40, is a compulsive liar, but is also paranoid. not a big surprise.
I thought he was black because William & melo thought he was. I think it’s because philosopher started a sentence with the words “as a black guy”
I’ll get the link
It was the 4th paragraph in this comment by philosopher that might have started the rumour he was black
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/06/11/the-irony-of-intelligence/#comment-27635
Philosopher wrote “as a black man I’m surprised”. But perhaps he was referring to someone else or was being facetious
my dad is a cunt, but he did finish top of his law school class and…
charles “the cross burner” murray was a year behind him. libertarian vp candidate bill weld and forbes 400er bruce kovner were in his class.
what’s the deal with kovner?
the way he tells the story in the year book he sounds like he got lucky, but he’s a republican…of the never trump variety.
if your story is true, or just peepee’s true life story, it’s another example of how artificial a construct class is.
you’re a concern troll.
that “report” is a joke.
jeethuth chrith…
I remember that too pp
He said he was blasian. It think Korean?
Wtf is a concern troll? Camacho is a crazy guy!
a “concern troll” is someone who pretends to agree but brings up exception after exception in an attempt to change the minds of those he is pretending to agree with.
Camacho is a crazy guy!
thank you kind sir.
“the philosopher” pretends to be an anti-semite yet expresses admiration for freud and soros (on lion’s blog).
he claims to be an SCZ case yet the only legit crazy thing he’s ever said was that he had “visions of putin” and that putin was controlling lion somehow. (again on lion’s blog).
decide what you are. are you a man or a woman caitlyn the philosopher?
I don’t understand how anyone can admire Freud. He was a total loon and pervert. The interesting thing is that a moderately smart lunatic could become very accomplished in those days. The bar has been raised in the modern hyper competitive world. It’s become virtually impossible to truly distinguish oneself. My theory is that in individualist cultures, this leads to alienation and criminal behaviour. This is especially true for men because we have a natural competitive streak and the rage to be somebody.
ohhhhhh, he thought I was black lol. Either that or he’s a troll/liar.
Pump
That sentence should be interpreted, “as a black man, I’m surprised you blah blah”. I was saying he was a black man therefore X. Considering my overall comments in that thread were decidedly “racist” and against blacks, within that context you should easily be able to tell I meant him.
Trumpy
Did you read the AMA by the “FBI Informer” or not? I’d like to know whether you think he is a legit top level informant.
**
How can you have a view that Zionism is bad for humanity and respect Soros, Freud, Marx? Easy – they have good ideas.
I’m against black immigration and AA too but I enjoy some of their contribution to music, comedy and sport nevertheless.
Anyways, point of fact Soros was against the Iraq war, is against neoliberalism, says the media should be regulated to tell the truth, and has added a lot to my understanding of the world. Watch his Open Society lectures on youtube. I don’t think he is a neocohen – at all. He argues for financial regulation, which is not what a lot of hedgies argue for publicly.
I think he genuinely believes in Popper’s vision. Now whether a man of his ability believes in the Blank Slate, I find that very hard to believe. I think he regresses it back to the Rawlsian Veil though to counteract this.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/219455
Bad boy. Jewish media doesn’t like him for being anti-Zionist.
From wiki:
“Soros has stated that he helped in the confiscation of Jewish property on multiple occasions, but that he felt no feeling of guilt for his actions, explaining: “In a funny way, it’s just like in markets – that if I weren’t there… someone else would be taking it away anyhow… So I had no sense of guilt”.[23] Of the Nazi occupation of Hungary, Soros would write in 2000 (in the foreword to the publication of his father’s autobiography): “It is a sacrilegious thing to say, but these ten months were one of the happiest times in my life”.[24] Soros said that he “grew up in a Jewish, anti-Semitic home,” and that his parents were “uncomfortable with their religious roots.” They changed their name from Schwartz (“black” in German) to Soros (a successor in Hungarian) in 1936 to disassociate themselves from the Jewish community.”
These last 2 paras were put in by zionists in his wiki early life to make him not seem like one of the Boys, because I hadn’t seen then a few months back. And it bolsters the idea he is not a zionist. He was also only 14 at the time which isn’t mentioned. I was an impressionable lad then. He funds Palestinians FFS!!!!
His emails don’t betray a puppetmaster.
He is a liberal humanitarian zealot.
He seems to have funded the Panama Papers tax evasion exposure (which implicated Rothschild entities) and the Luxembourg drop too. He also funds many anti-poverty programmes. Most plutocrats throw money at university stadiums, anti-aging research and art centres because they hate the ordinary man and their charity must benefit them or their progeny.
My hunch is that conservatives have Soros as some sort of mastermind Zionist. When in truth, its the opposite. He is a mastermind liberal. A fairly conventional liberal.
Outside of my closed border beliefs, I’m a fairly conventional liberal myself.
As for Freud, see my comment above. He is a brilliant mind. Read his essay Civilization and its Discontents. If you can’t see it, you are blind.
**
You should be looking at Sheldon Adelson. He is Trump’s biggest donor, despite the fact he is the biggest open Zionist around since Sharon.
”I don’t understand how anyone can admire Freud. He was a total loon and pervert. The interesting thing is that a moderately smart lunatic could become very accomplished in those days. The bar has been raised in the modern hyper competitive world. It’s become virtually impossible to truly distinguish oneself. My theory is that in individualist cultures, this leads to alienation and criminal behaviour. This is especially true for men because we have a natural competitive streak and the rage to be somebody.”
Fraud was one of first beneficiary of jewish nepotism.
But, i thought we need to be more cautious to condemn him before analyse all of their ideas. Fraud over-abused greek mythology and metaphors, without contextualize into the real world. Their ideas are at least interesting, but seems far to be factually correct. He saw some remote patterns and correlate them without verify factually the veracity of this patterns, for example, the ”anal period” during childhood.
”I thought he was black because William & melo”
me too, =(
did you say ‘as a Black guy I would’
or just ‘as a Black guy’.
Words matter.
i’m a zionist. i want all the jews to go back to israel.
soros is an arrant globalist. this contradicts his claim to advocate an open society in two ways:
1. one world government can only operate in secret and anti-democratically. geography and peoples are too varied for a one size fits all government aka a global closed society.
2. monopolies are less efficient than businesses in a competitive industries. many sovereign states competing with one another makes them all better. many experiments done simultaneously means solutions will be found much faster.
for those who don’t know what is meant by an open society, it means that the principle of kaizen should be applied to government and that all ideologies are therefore false…just waiting to be disconfirmed. the idea of the open society follows from popper’s idea of falsifiability. another word for “open society” is pragmatism or social evolution.
Trumpy
Did you read the AMA by the “FBI Informer” or not? I’d like to know whether you think he is a legit top level informant.
of course it’s not legit.
I never said I was a follower of globalism either.
As a conventional liberal, like say Bernie Sanders before he ran for president, I’m for closed borders and nation states.
Liberalism has much more in common with the anti-imperial movements post WW2, than conservatism has.
It is a sad state of affairs that liberals have been co-opted into imperialism.
They cannot see Israel and Saud are imperialists no different from Victorian Britain or France in older times.
To their credit, the only real anti-Zionist calls for boycotts, sanctions and bans on Israel come from the “loony” left. Hopefully, their ideas can be aided by the alt-right to gain traction.
The altright hates Zion because it doesn’t want the Jews to be the master race.
The BDS movement hates Zion because its imperialist, inhumane and facist.
I genuinely think we can make an accord here. Compared to most other problems in the world, the Eye of Zion is more problematic than the quarrels between Rohan and Gondor.
Are there any large datasets out there (~1000 samples) related to iq? Like a list of features describing individuals (educational attainment, race, sat score, height, political views) and an iq score of that individual. Looking to apply my machine learning skills by writing a program that can estimate the iq of an individual.
I tried that on a data set i have of about 200 Canadians
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/05/17/revised-formula-for-estimating-iq-from-bio-demographics/
Awesome! Yea that post was really interesting. I’m thinking something that could also be useful for hiring managers. Ideally using features that would be listed on a resume (prestige of school attended for example, maybe even number of different words used) to estimate their general aptitude without actually assessing them. Any thoughts? I’ll look at that data set.
you’re not going to find anything.
IQ is positively correlated with everything good and negatively correlated with everything bad…
but the correlations are all going to be weak, feeble, pathetic, etc.
peepee and the HBDers don’t get this.
though one bad thing which IQ has a very strong negative correlation with is SCZ. this may be because of class-ism on the part of psychiatrists or it may be that the same hypothetical disease entity expresses itself differently among the high IQ. mathematicians tend to be weird, but john nash’s SCZ is very uncommon among people with what i would guess was his general intelligence level…of course it’s possible he just had a specific talent for math. and it’s clear from reading what he’s written that ted kaczynski was not a case of SCZ.
But high creativity is correlated with eccentricity and mental illness. Wouldn’t SCZ in a smart person make him more creative? Bipolar disorder is the classic example that comes to mind. A lot of creative types have it.
my limited understanding of psychosis, paranoia, bizarre delusions is that all seem to require a lack of what psychiatrists call “insight”.
oscar wilde said…
a gentleman is never rude…un-intentionally.
so very smart people can believe seemingly crazy things, can behave in a seemingly crazy manner. the difference is that such know that their beliefs or behavior will be regarded by many as crazy.
or as robert blake said on The Late Late Show…
if you know you’re crazy, you aren’t crazy.
and robert blake is crazy, just not in any medical sense.
Schizo is not uniform like autism.
There are different types of schizo – schizoid (Elliot Roger), schizotypal (Michael Jackson is a good example) and of course paranoid schizo (Stalin).
You do not need to be fully schizophrenic to have these personality disorders.
Just like aspergers is not full on autism which prohibits any work.
Full on autism and full on schizophrenia are probably correlated with low IQ. Schizo is the “black mans disease” after all. But they are creative in fashion, music, comedy and so on.
Autism is the East Asian man’s “disease”. They have no creativity, but excellent analytical tendency.
Positively good for what, for whom*
and, blue collar crimes tend to be very impactant and almost of the blue collar criminals score higher in IQ tests.
Schizophrenia is older than autism** it appear during the human adaptation to the language*
”and it’s clear from reading what he’s written that ted kaczynski was not a case of SCZ.”
High functioning schizophrenia. High IQ supposedly make people
more logical
BELIEVE they are more logical
maybe, it’s not exactly to be, but believe you’re
or emotional stability…
high iq correlated very well with emotional stability.
one of the most characteristic traits of schizophrenics seems is the certainty of the uncertainty…
isn’t* 😉
low IQ schizophrenics seems are more prone to believe in their mind distortions…
avg, reasonably high and higher IQ doesn’t…
The schizo is quite simply the most animal, primitive mind.
It is needed in Kinshasa where you could have your head beat in while you sleep.
Thats why blacks have it more.
Somebody whose instinct is to always see threat is going to live in agony, but live, he will.
”The schizo is quite simply the most animal, primitive mind.”
why*
Its pretty obvious schizo is R selected and autism, K selected. They are almost comical parodies of the R selected and K selected mind.
Schizophrenia is universal among humans is not* even in hunter gatherers*
and autism*
Interesting distinction. It seems to make sense. Also, the crazy person who knows he’s crazy is in some sense bounded by his self-awareness while an unaware crazy person can be as crazy as he wants.
it’s got nothing to do with level of craziness.
the person who is aware that what he believes or does may be thought crazy is not crazy…
AT ALL.
It’s just a semantic issue. “Crazy” the way you’ve defined it precludes smart people. To me, Robert Blake seems crazier than normal but I would say he is less crazy than a full blown schizo because he’s self-aware.
It’s just semantics! Words are just concepts!
That’s not quite true. You can be semi-aware or at least, confused.
I have a number of delusions that feel like they’re true even though when I sit down to think about it, and write it down it’s ridiculous when others read it and tell me.
BUT I STILL FEEL THEY ARE TRUE.
I saw a few weeks back you had something similar going on with you accusing Pumpkin of giving your phone number to someone.
I bet now you think it was rash and stupid. Which is “sane”. But in the heat of your schizo smog, you felt it was true even though a part of you thought it was absurd.
And when you are run down or anxious again, you may even start thinking it really was her.
I sometimes get limousine window vision. And then within a few minutes, the thoughts come.
I have a weird conundrum in that I have a reasoning capability that means I will exceed the vast majority of people, but when I entertain delusions that say, Person A is a rape victim, I can (a) convince people that it might be true (b) not take people talking me down seriously cos they is stoopid (c) draw on my past predictive successes in other areas to fortify my delusion instead of dissipating the tension, rage and eventual lashing out.
The content of the delusion matters. Delusion in you think the front door is unlocked is different from say, thinking your friend’s gf is having a threesome with illegal immigrants. The accusation matters. Is it unhinged? Racy? Threatening?
I got thrown out of a house share not so long ago for lashing out at one of the girls for repeatedly poisoning my food. I really believed it.
Likewise as I write this, I still feel Person A was raped.
I cannot explain how agonising it is. They are only feelings, but I can’t accept they’re wrong, otherwise I feel like I’m a sitting duck.
The only difference between myself and my mother then is that I can entertain the notion I’m wrong. But other than that, I feel it just as strongly. Or rejig the conspiracy to work around the debunkings. Depending on the content of the delusion, I can never be wrong.
”It’s just semantics! Words are just concepts!”
Not exactly…
concepts are meaning….
words is like double understanding of certain phenomena
first we understand in subconscious way
second we fix this understanding via associative symbols…
verbal memorization is the secondary memorization, the first is the non-verbal, or not…
just other kick!!!
“Crazy” the way you’ve defined it precludes smart people.
only if you don’t count depression or ocd as crazy. i was just talking about psychosis.
the point is that if someone is aware that what he does or believes may be thought crazy then it’s not just that he isn’t crazy…
what he does or believes won’t be crazy either.
that is, someone who believes that alien vampires are eating his brain will not be aware that other people think this is crazy. someone who goes streaking at some televised event knows what he’s doing. someone who shows up without clothes because he’s forgotten them doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Not that he’s crazy because he “wants” to be; his craziness lies outside his agency. But he can be infinitely crazy. So it might be more of a magnitude difference than a difference in kind. That is to say the smart schizo is simply less schizo, otherwise called high functioning in the psychological community.
Some men are born aristocratic without money. The truly intelligent are necessarily alienated for every social interaction assumes a degree of common experience between its participants. An indigent aristocrat has very little in common with anyone. Alienation is his natural feeling.
”Some men are born aristocratic without money. The truly intelligent are necessarily alienated for every social interaction assumes a degree of common experience between its participants. An indigent aristocrat has very little in common with anyone. Alienation is his natural feeling.”
I’m elitist, i mean, absolutely elitist (no money, no material, the ”supremacism” is ourselves…
danke you!!!!
Dilma is soo…..
fantastic, she even know to do the heart with his hands. I’m afraid of this kind of people, sorry.
go out satan!!!! =(
i couldn’t find the snippet, but i did find this from 1996!
he was a trumpista before trump.
God damn it! the whole thing is worth watching, but here’s the trump speech from 1996!
How does “Moogabi” feel about Alex Jones?
Alex Jones is a conspiracy type, runs a youtube channel dedicated to it.
His wife is Jewish, and part of his motivation appears to be steering away conspiracy theorist types away from blaming the Jews for the conspiracies themselves.
His show has been called a “Kosher conspiracy zone”.
His like a (((Stefan Molyneux))) with an IQ > 80
*he is like a….
it doesn’t matter whether jews conspire or cheat or don’t.
it’s irrelevant to serious anti-semites, nazis, like me.
i don’t care.
It obviously DOES make a difference, whether you know it or not.
Do you hate Blacks as much?
Or Latrinos?
NO
it’s about the influence Jews have.
There’s a reason Jared Taylor is basically universally regarded as a fucktard, or rather, the most fucktarded person to graduate Yale.
kind of like Lion I guess, but I’ve never read Lion.
Alex Jones is far to be stupid, seems
yep, he seems invent that reptlian story just to divide the ”anti-system” coalition in even more atomized sectors.
he say
– reptilians are nazis
– racism is bad
blablabla
he attract part of the leftist anti-system with psychotic-prone steroids.
Never are the jooishches, are that basterd aliens!!!
every divisive and fabricated sector of pseudo-opposition have some OTHER fundamental cause of western melodrama (mexican soap opera), less (((th’em)), 😉
alex jones’s wife is jewish?
he’s just an entertainer.
conspiracy theory people are morons, but one should always expect the worst.
If you were truly clever…
HBD can support the idea;
that Jewish nepotism has the scientific explanation of EGIs.
#autismisgood
Yes jewish nepotism has scientific explanation of EGIs but it don’t prove that it’s not quite psychopathic and/or conscious nasty.
Yea she is (was). They got divorced last year.
Most of these conspiracy types are demented clowns.
Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Stef Molyneux, Marc Faber (although he has one gem every 200 sentences), Europacific Capital man, Max Keiser, Jim Cramer, Glenn Beck, Russell Brand (although he has a good heart) etc
Jim Rogers is obviously not a clown, but keeps talking his book. I don’t think he seriously believes someone should go into farming. Soros would not associate with an idiot like that as managing partner in his quantum fund.
Mike Cernovich does very good investigative journalism instead of just sitting around “interpreting” the news for us.
Stick to reading books, looking at data, reading what the elite read to make money (i.e. financial press). Don’t depend on someone else to interpret facts and spoonfeed you. Even I’m just one guy with a large flashlight in a very big room, and I’m half blind with delusion.
let’s do it again with the comment peepee won’t post…for mysterious reasons…
there ARE two classifications of ideologies current and historic.
1. the individualist ideology.
this ideology really has become THE individualist ideology in that its contemporary expression is “FULL-ON”/100%/”NO FUCKING AROUND”…contemporary american “libertarianism”/”randianism”/koch bros/etc.
and that this ideology has “matured” is to its credit. it’s got its period before the second big division of ideologies…
2. the corporatist ideology.
none have gone FULL-ON corporatist yet, so at the present time this is really a name for a mere SET of ideologie-S.
————————-
both of these are FALSE ideologies, but #1 has gone to the extreme while #2 has only emphasized certain subsets like worker/owner (Marx) or race/gender/sexual orientation/etc. (contemporary liberal americans).
—————————-
i remember reading The Great Soviet Encyclopedia on marxism…
it described the ideology of the USSR as the final result of the…
EVOLUTION of ideologies…
its ideology was the one true ideology…
surprise!
of course it wasn’t, but…
the “economic failure” of the soviet union is like…what’s it like? ah yes!
it wasn’t like anything, because it NEVER happened.
let’s do it!
AGAIN!
As far as I can tell the individualist ideology is a very recent phenomenon historically and arguably doesn’t really exist outside of Anglo-Sphere Zion (for a reason?). I’m open to the idea it is “more mature”, but I would argue libertarians seem to be the most socially inept.
I would even argue that its close cousin, neoliberalism, was created to psychologically detach the WASP elite from their brethren so Zion could take over. Generally, even elites in places like Afghanistan have even some elements of noblesse oblige enough not to want to exterminate their own people for profit.
What you mean with “corporatism” is collectivism.
Who, Whom?
Collectivism has existed long before individualism. Ancient sparta is a good example. Sparta wouldn’t have countenanced letting a middle eastern tribe control their academy or money temples.
Therefore collectivism is more viable in the same way lone wolves, or splintered societies are apt to divide and conquer by the most powerful collectivist forces, like Zion.
While we may laugh at the ant people of the PRC, I would tend to put money on them surviving long term, than say Western Whites as a race who are “rugged individuals”.
Ideologies are created and promulgated for Extractor control…even “individualist” ones.
Individualism doesn’t exist organically in history because it is a response to a set of conditions and environmental permutations (state collectivism/civilisation) that allows this particular strain of thought to pretend its an offshoot. In reality it is more a disgruntled teenager rebelling from the safety of his parent’s bedroom and the policeman’s truncheon. Like its followers outside of the Extractor class.
Have I cracked it?
New left was invented to foment conflicts within western societies, making the world so bad and having only the global/jewish ”socialism” as a answer for all problems… created by themselves.
Time to be creative now.
If we could redesign the US/European Curriculum what would it look like?
(A good objection is that education should be localised,even regional, but just for sake of argument)
I would say the following subjects should be mandatory once adequate literary/numeracy levels are achieved:
1. Nutrition/Athletic Performance – how to read food labels, optimise diet for optimum mental/physical performance, supplements and contraindications, bulk/cut weight, create diet plan, diets for kids/oldies/preggies, hormones etc.
2. Personal finance – Stupidity of active investing/trading for vast majority of people, ETFs/asset allocation, DC pension management including SIPPs/annuities/insurance bonds and their US equivalents, tax management, insurance policy appraisal (my favourite), credit appraisal & sourcing, basic real estate appraisal, retirement planning.
3. Stats/Data analytics – Standalone modules in data analytics, stat theory, interpreting data and journal articles, probability math, using simulation. Coding for data analytics.
4. Comp Sci
5. Foreign language
6. Real history – the pedagogy would be different. People would be given a real historical scenario and asked to used theory, prior fact and general ecology/economic theory or other to predict how events turned out.
8. Mixed Martial Arts and firearm proficiency (more useful in America where there are dangerous blacks).
Advanced:
9. Philosophy – Ethics, Political Theory, Epistemology, Mind, Aesthetics, Logic basically anything except “analytical” semanticology.
10. Data collection/Personal Research/Mosaic Theory. Primary Induction methods for the individual.
11. Psychology – R/K mating and how to become ‘selected’, NLP/hypnosis/brainwashing methods and countermeasures, operant conditioning, Cognitive Biases of humans and appropriate coping strategies, Coping with deficits in quant, verbal, social intelligence, Mental Health Management & Coping with mental illness, nootropics and pharma solutions.
12 Operations Research
I bet the vast majority of people have about 5% of this covered to an adequate degree.
More importantly I would ban:
1. Religious teaching
2. All ideological teaching
3. Fake history
”Logic basically anything except “analytical” semanticology”
what is it*
First, why you put quotes in the adjective analytical *
Second, what the term ‘semanticology’ mean *
I don’t know if you know but humans only understand the reality in their reached levels via meaning of words. So someone who use words that s/he don’t know the meaning and real-word aplicability/contextuality, usually become a prey of someone who know == mental slaves. In other words, understanding of meaning words is not just to understanding of meaning words but also to fight against try of attacks by those who are good to manipulate it.
i will wait for your answers.
Slight correction
”understanding of the meaning words is not just the understand of the meanings world”.
I actually think that’s a valid point in a certain sense.
But generally its a road to nowhere. It just regresses to ‘what is blue’.
The point of language is not to define, but to express. If I speak cantonese, and only hong kong chinese understand me, I don’t lose sleep that the dutch would get it.
The meanings of concrete-nature words are universal, the cow is a cow in anywhere, what may can change just slightly is not the ”concept/what is it but the ”utilitarian” concept/ it serve– is useful for what…
Even many abstract-nature words are universal in most places.
Language is to define and to express if the definition is itself a expression.
No, you’re despising one of the most important genuine philosophical principles, the very relevance to understand the symbols ”we” invented to understand in more deep way the reality we are interacting.
you don’t answer my questions, i still waiting for it…
explain me for me what your pejoractivized concept ”analytical semanticology” mean and its contextual/real world aplicabilities with exemplifications.
You’re making an assumption words are concrete.
They’re liquid.
That’s why I’ve always said I work much better with liquid than blocks.
You still can’t answer satisfactorily ‘what is blue’.
Go ahead, define blue.
Notice how other languages have compound or multiple words with different “variations sur la meme chose”? In some languages you can have 5 different words for a certain thing each highlighting a particular property of the thing. Some people purposely change the meaning of words.
Are you “gay”? Or happy?
Locke – substance and properties.
Isolate the substance of “chair”.
What image comes up in your mind?
Now do you think I have the exact same image?
Now try “freedom”.
QED
”You’re making an assumption words are concrete.
They’re liquid.”
I already give examples to you
a cow is not a liquid concept…
Words, even abstract ones, are never entirely liquid.
subjectivity is not entirely conclusive because many times it’s just a incomplete objectivity, vague assumptions, indeed, subjectivities are fractionated objectivities…
”You still can’t answer satisfactorily ‘what is blue’.
Go ahead, define blue.”
Your pretend to be sarcastic example is not satisfatory to be used in this conversation, specially because blue is the symbol/word for the color, a concrete assumption.
”Notice how other languages have compound or multiple words with different “variations sur la meme chose”? In some languages you can have 5 different words for a certain thing each highlighting a particular property of the thing. Some people purposely change the meaning of words.”
Just tell me, what you understand of my previous comment*
”Are you “gay”? Or happy?”
the fact that there are a diversity of frivolous or excessive, not so frivolous and useful words among human languages don’t prove your point, very vague/little developed.
”Locke – substance and properties.
Isolate the substance of “chair”.
What image comes up in your mind?”
I don’t understand this sentence.
Freedom is not liquid or semantic changeable by the flavor of the wind.
Try poli-faceted concept…
freedom can be in all sizes, flavours, colors… and this diversity is not fluid in this concept,
freedom is freedom,
bigger or little,
blue or red,
what is eventually and/or possibly more liquid is their contextual application, but its semantic roots don’t change.
How do you know what “Blue” really is? (philosophy nonsense that no one thinks about.)
Autists should be banned from philosophy. Your brain is not built to work with liquid at all. Thankfully nobody reads that post Russell junk because its for retarded people.
“the fact that there are a diversity of frivolous or excessive, not so frivolous and useful words among human languages don’t prove your point, very vague/little developed.”
But it does completely. You could even argue most words started off as slang. Most classicists know that. Even english is a pidgin slapdash dialect of older germanic languages and latin.
What is “frivolous” to you is your subjective judgement. Define frivolous.
How many people used the word gay as slur to mean homosexual and not happy as its older “objective” meaning. When does a word become “objective” and not “frivolous” anymore? Is there a champagne bottle smashed on the word in the dictionary before it sets sail on its maiden conversation for new use?
Hard as it is for you to believe, there is no central word authority or repository that invented language that everyone has to follow stringently or be sent to Siberia. Even grammar is liquid.
Language is not efficient. It wasn’t particularly meant to be. I can say the same sentence in even less words.
Language is flexible for maximum expression.
Verstanden?
If I want to add verbiage for artistic flair than why not?
DOES NOT COMPUTE ERROR 356 INEFFICIENT MUST PUT HEAD IN COLD WATER.
Speaking to someone in Shakespeare’s time would be an ordeal. This is why most people must read him alongside cliffnotes. Yet Shakespeare can still be understood today.
Our words are pistaches of older images seen in new lights.
What is “objective” language? That’s a ridiculous concept. More rule following stoopidity. What is the most objective language in the world? Why doesn’t everyone use that?
People who are not autistic ‘get the drift’. They don’t need to be spoonfed words and translations and have a panel of experts vote on whether your interpretation is what is really meant or not. Just because there is not panel of judges doesn’t mean there’s no “real” meaning and the conversation failed in its effect.
The fact Wittgenstein spent 30 years pointing out how he can’t understand philosophers writing is a bit comical to anyone not autistic. In a sane world he would have been laughed out of the building and told to stick with the bolts and screws like those in his head.
1. Cow was a form of money in many medieval societies for example. They would have said chattel or an older derivative. The impression someone would have in non-autistic “efficiency” speech when using that word in like slang, metaphor, art or an analogy is not concrete either.
2. Blue is not a “concrete” assumption. It doesn’t even exist to most lifeforms or many human beings with blindness or other disability even as an objective phenomenon.
For all we know, people have different hues of colour depending on retina quality, age and so forth. We also use blue to mean sad or joyless. Or in urban speech, without heroin or left hanging sexually. We still get by.
It’s very annoying having to contort into autist micro-logic to explain something most people ‘get’ instinctually. Like holding up a smiley face and saying that means happy.
Because aspergers people can’t feel when another person ‘gets’ something or not or dresses like a retard because they can’t tell what people think, they assume that language as to be bullet proof like computer code for any meaning or communication to happen between two non-robots.
Regression always to the Blue Problem.
We use blue to get by. I’m not worried whether a blind person or autistic person doesn’t get it. I wasn’t writing for him.
I will answer your usual bizarre schizophrenic refutation “Philosopher”… When I had using a computer.
A pseudo intellectual as you “Philosopher” must be prohibited to think.
Smell bad…
”Autists should be banned from philosophy. Your brain is not built to work with liquid at all. Thankfully nobody reads that post Russell junk because its for retarded people.”
Philo,
you’re schizo, isn’t** (or just other lie*)
who are you to talk other person ”retarded”**
wait, seems have shadow behind you!!!
Your brain Philo IS too liquid to be concrete,
you should write science fiction stories, perhaps a Nobel prize for literature * what do you think* Do not forget to put a Jewish surname.
You are a common case of confusion intellectual identity: you think that is a rational thinker, but in fact you are a writer, seems, no so good writer.
Its widespread discrimination against autistic people is shameful. And I’m not autistic, there is an autistic here, tell to him everything you ‘think’ about them. I’m not autistic, despite having ‘autistic traits”, as almost everyone has, to a greater or lesser extent.
Actually I have the impression that most of the great philosophers had a bit of autism, if we may say so, like that, like I have, 😉 . A good mix of literal and metaphorical thinking and a good USE of it, what matter.
”But it does completely. You could even argue most words started off as slang. Most classicists know that. Even english is a pidgin slapdash dialect of older germanic languages and latin.
What is “frivolous” to you is your subjective judgement. Define frivolous.”
Don’t prove your point your stupid schizo!!! You’re not arguing about your point of views, you’re using examples about my statement, lol.
There is a dictionary where you will find the meaning of this word.
”define frivolous”, JEEZZ
homossexual, gay, fag, imagine more 20 words to define people who are attracted to the same sex. = excessive, frivolous.
language is subjectively liquid specially for
stupid = don’t understand well the words s/he is using
psychopath = manipulate it specially against the stupid to take selfish advantages
gay, homossexual, fag,
the concept is the same,
what’s matter is the concept, is the association of the symbol with the REAL identity, it’s not liquid or niilistic subjective in anyplace.
”Hard as it is for you to believe, there is no central word authority or repository that invented language that everyone has to follow stringently or be sent to Siberia. ”
psychotic moment.
always the mediocre as you schizo think like that
CONFORM to the mediocrity
the world is like that, accept it, accept the STUPID mistakes of proto-psychotic humans and good night!!!
exactly because i know very well that
most human retards don’t understand the words they are using,
many of those who understand manipulate those who don’t understand, at conscious or subconscious way,
language is the instrument of power BUT should be the instrument to the reason and harmony,
that i ”believe” semantic precision is one of the most important political statements to start to fight definitively against any social injustice.
”Language is not efficient. It wasn’t particularly meant to be. I can say the same sentence in even less words.”
Humans are dumb enough to be inept to use it in efficient way, language is a not a being to be efficient or not, the human/subject that is.
say none sentences, would be a great job for you, a shy light of reason by your part.
”What is “objective” language? That’s a ridiculous concept. More rule following stoopidity. What is the most objective language in the world? Why doesn’t everyone use that?”
burn dictionaries, schizophrenia hurts#
7 billion metastastic human creeps
and just very few of them are very intelligent enough to understand, very well done, my SIMPLE points…
language was invented to increase the objective understanding of reality. Deny the urgency to objectivity in human language is not just extremely dumb but very dangerous…
again, it’s just like deny almost of the pillars that has sustained all rational thinking of man.
”People who are not autistic ‘get the drift’. They don’t need to be spoonfed words and translations and have a panel of experts vote on whether your interpretation is what is really meant or not. Just because there is not panel of judges doesn’t mean there’s no “real” meaning and the conversation failed in its effect.”
You created a new pseudo-science, autisticology…
His sentences are poorly written, and you must have English as mother language. You write bad, confuse and vague. The typical pseudo-philosopher, prefabricated in massified universities.
Human intuition is great at certain levels and become mostly wrong at advanced/abstract levels.
To understand concretudes (less schizos, 😉 ): to see a cow, to see a sky, even with distortions, humans are great, quite balanced in their sensorial capture of reality they are interacting and their intuition work very well at sensory levels. But to translate it to the verbal manner and abstract-verbal manner, and in the fast mode, humans are terrible.Binnary thinking born when the simple, fast and intuitive capture of the reality is wrongly translated to the verbal-abstract understanding. People loose refferences, but wait, this references already there, in the concrete world, they use it
…
without re-think, because the abstract world is not a real world, but can be very important to increase the knowledge, understanding and even the power of the tiny world we are.
How often do you review your thinking, your sentences here**
nothing**
most people also don’t re-think your thoughts**
stop to say ”non-autistic people think like that”, ”autistic people think like that”
is becoming grossly stupid.
”The fact Wittgenstein spent 30 years pointing out how he can’t understand philosophers writing is a bit comical to anyone not autistic. In a sane world he would have been laughed out of the building and told to stick with the bolts and screws like those in his head.”
Many to most of historically recognized ”philosophers” weren’t philosophers, those who follow wisdom/harmony, even in their written, lol.
”philosophy” has been used as a FRIVOLOUS human activity, those ”thinker” who live socially atomized, creating non-concrete political, social or economic systems (libertarians**) or someone who think philosophy is ”write beautifully but without any substance”.
the ideal of philosophy is the wisdom, and most of self-declared philosophers are far to be wise people.
”1. Cow was a form of money in many medieval societies for example. They would have said chattel or an older derivative. The impression someone would have in non-autistic “efficiency” speech when using that word in like slang, metaphor, art or an analogy is not concrete either.”
Don’t prove your point creepy!!
proof that his head is melting so much liquid. do you have hydrocephaly*
”2. Blue is not a “concrete” assumption. It doesn’t even exist to most lifeforms or many human beings with blindness or other disability even as an objective phenomenon.
For all we know, people have different hues of colour depending on retina quality, age and so forth. We also use blue to mean sad or joyless. Or in urban speech, without heroin or left hanging sexually. We still get by.”
Don’t prove you point creepy!!!
Expression is a ”non-thing”, expressions are abstractions, for example, emotions, even there is a entire concrete mechanism behind it.
Blue IS a concrete reality as cow, i can see a blue color, there a tons of different types of blue, but there is.
but sadness no have color, even sadness have a expression.
what my sensorial system can interact is concrete, even there are a spectrum between concrete and ‘imaterial”. maybe emotions can be understand as quite concrete too.
but the very idea of concretude, by my point of view here, is based on matter ”or” organism.
abstract is everything that is not immediately perceived/concrete/ that flees from the right now.
”It’s very annoying having to contort into autist micro-logic to explain something most people ‘get’ instinctually. Like holding up a smiley face and saying that means happy.”
instinct make people dumb, creepy and problematic as you…
i will repeat…
do you think i’m autistic but in fact i’m quite the opposite, even i have some characteristic trends that are common among autism spectrum like literal thinking.
i inherited partially speaking some morbid psychological traits of my maternal uncle and he is pre-psychotic, he invent stories about fake hollywood girlfriends, just to start… i inherited the good aspects of their morbid psychological profile, 😉
your ”autism detection” is with faulty.
” I wasn’t writing for him.”
you’re writing for your imaginary friends, 😉
do you also invent stories of fake famous girlfriends**
Recaptulating…
i’m not autistic, stop to write as if i’m,
language IS to objective understanding of the world, association between symbol and real identity, yes, creep dumbs as you make this ideal ”objective understanding”, quite difficult,
there are a spectrum between concrete and imaterial things,
language distortions are used to manipulate people or even to common people manipulate one each other, generally to conform, even at family levels, so solve this problem, stop to liquidify language to be used for clever assholes, and real social justice and long term sustainable will be not just a dream,
you’re a not that master of ”theory of mind” you think that is… because you think rigidly ”i’m paranoid = i’m the opposite of autistics = genius of theory of mind”… indeed, autistics and schizos often have different profiles, but their social deficits can be in the same level of ineptitude,
i’m more near to your psychosis than you think, 😉 (boo) and a real perceptive people, not your case, would have notice some of my tendencies,
you’re far to be dumb, as i’m insulting you, BUT there are two path to the intelligence and only one them to the reason:
– above avg good to argue, ”rationalized” your thoughts,
– be definitively right about your point of views (path to the reason).
you’re a not bad in the first path… the otherwise.
but in the second, you’re following the COMMON PLACE in modern ”philosophy”
”the truth is what you decide it’s truth”
mental age***
a literal day dreaming teenager with self-label of philosopher**
insurance policy appraisal (my favourite)
why? life insurance is a scam with the exception of term for people with dependents. rates are way too low to make life annuities worth it. and if they were worth it, as in the early 80s, it would have been better just to buy long term bonds.
indexing has worked thus far…but not in japan…the whole developed world’s markets are going to go the way of japan’s. at this time it’s better to go full-on extraction. high-yield bonds, high “shareholder yield” stocks, private equity, BDCs,
beaten down banks, mortgage REITs, buy write funds, etc.
there’s never going to be any growth again.
this doesn’t contradict the advice i’ve given before peepee.
my theory is:
1. the long bond will have a ytm < 2% for most of the coming 20 years. the short rate will be < 1% forever. thus leverage is the only sure way to make bank in the coming decades.
2. there will be no economic growth in the developed world ever again. the stock markets of the world will go up and down but in the end sideways forever. there might be some exceptions in emerging markets, but thus far the growth in the chinese economy has been very poorly reflected in the growth of the chinese stock market. india may be different, but its market is quite pricey at present.
investor ab is essentially a private equity firm like blackstone or carlyle, but it specializes in sweden. FANUC is a jap company but unlike the jap market, it always goes up, and will continue to go up. it’s only competitor is a much smaller and much more expensive german company, KUKA.
i’ve done very well recently with DNB, Svenska H, Intesa, Caixa…i don’t expect they’ll grow much ever, but they pay fat dividends. i also hold Nordea and Swedbank.
most of so called “alpha” comes from asset allocation iirc.
so “the philosopher” is right that one should index, but only in a sense. he must index only after he’s decided the %s he’s going to give to each asset class.
that is, simply buying a total world stock index fund and a total world bond index fund is going to suck in the decades to come.
but once you’ve decided on the asset class allocation and geography, then ETFs or vg OEFs or deeply discounted CEFs are the way to go.
my best performing security over the preceding 12 months was the i-shares new zealand fund. it’s an index fund, but i had to decide on it rather than some other country index fund…which is active management of a sort. vg has no country funds, let alone a new zealand fund.
i own CAF. that’s the best option for small time retail investors like me who want some exposure to the PRC. and yet it’s an absurdly expensive and actively managed fund. so how can it still be the best? because as of today it sells at a 16.36% discount to its NAV, and has always had a huge discount. http://www.morningstar.com/cefs/xnys/caf/quote.html
so there are some important exceptions to the indexing mantra…
and of course indexing can only work as long as a significant portion of investors are NOT doing it. indexing is basically a “free ride” in a market which is made efficient by active managers.
Yes that is why I said ETF/asset allocation in the same breath.
Also think about industry coverage ETFs.
I’ve found the Lyxor Healthcare ETF a real beaut. Healthcare is going to boom, even in countries with public systems. Without saying too much related to my former role, its a dead cert (aha).
I have my eye on a Fintech ETF as well.
https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/232231/fintech-etfs-head-to-head-finq-vs-finx
You generally want exposure to inflation busters and demographics over the long run – Healthcare, property related industries, essentially things with very inelastic supply relative to open borders demand.
While yield remains low, managing ‘real’ inflation (as Marc Faber explained – stuff that people buy not in the typical CPI like education, healthcare, cosmetic enhancements…haha), is actually going to give more alpha than yield hunting in my opinion.
The rentiers will keep crap zoning laws in place to boost property assets/yields. Short of banning soft drinks, a sugar tax, and illegal immigrants, healthcare is going to go through the roof.
As for insurance, you can get insurance on anything. I think annuities are dumb – layering TIPPs would work better if you wanted to hedge out credit and inflation risk and still give those assets to kids if you die.
They thing about insurance is that actuaries create policies to cover the statistical normal distribution of events (usually) meaning on any given customer they make a profit (i.e. premium + inv yield + excess > expected loss). But not every potential policy holder is a profit centre no matter how much you engineer it.
If the potential consumer is persistent and dogged, knows his own risk profile quantitatively and shops around, you can find plans with some customising that leave you ahead.
Think about health insurance, income insurance, gadget insurance, and so on. Managing expected loss is a big part of everyday life not really covered by most personal finance ‘experts’ who have 100x more to say on useless stock.fund picking.
orwell in the liquor store:
in the liquor stores in my city at least there are often pretty young women (or pretty young men) behind small tables giving out free samples of some new liquor.
so there’s this fairly good physical specimen (a young woman) trying to sell New Amsterdam‘s flavored vodkas.
i’m half drunk, so i engage.
that bottle…it’s in the shape of the new world trade center, “the freedom tower”.
…
because new amsterdam is what new york used to be.
then she says, peepee-like…
since when?! KNEE-SLAPPER!
i said…
since the dutch sold it to the british in the 17th century.
she says…
well they don’t tell us everything.
I think you live in a place like Portland, Oregon or some other place near the Pacific. You seem to live in a chilled out place.
said peepee.
No that’s not me either.
Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.
funny thing is, i don’t “actually” know if the bottle was modeled on “the freedom tower”. i’ve just seen the freedom tower over tom keene’s ginormous shoulder and thought…of course!
New Amsterdam bottle:
“freedom tower”:
btw, in accord with the linear height IQ relation…
tom keene and paul volker are fucking giants.
but tom keene is also a huge drunk!
Tom Keene is probably my favourite financial journalist and pundit. Hes a CFA as well which most fin journalists wouldn’t be able to do if they had a gun to their head. Great guy. Get a selfie!
the picture of tom keene standing next to michael bloomberg…
a picture’s worth a million words.
but i can’t find it.
but here are two pictures…combine them to get the picture…
i forgot to click on the picture before…
this dog’s mind is not his own…
a better picture of “the freedom tower”…
1776 feet right?
A bunch of useless comments made by a demented clown…
What are you waiting for to commit suicide *
If the potential consumer is persistent and dogged, knows his own risk profile quantitatively and shops around, you can find plans with some customising that leave you ahead.
maybe in the UK. but definitely NOT in the US.
and only maybe.
almost certainly NOT!
life insurance companies prey on ignorance.
how’d that happen?…
after my second interview with the pension (DB) consultancy in nj…(i told them to fuck off over the phone in islip.)
i was driving over the brooklyn bridge…and it came on the radio…NPR…part of http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/vote/list100.html
and i AM from that WHITE-OPIA…
i have an accent…
it sounds like the cook from a black and white western…or like bill gates…
and NIKE is my uni’s father…
let’s do it!
http://www.npr.org/2000/05/15/1074173/smells-like-teen-spirit
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/03/sports/ncaafootball/oregon-football-complex-is-glittering-monument-to-ducks-ambitions.html
let’s do it!
bill walton motherfuckers!
MAY D B COOPER LIVE…
FOREVER!
EVEN THOUGH…
D B COOPER/DAN COOPER…
WAS…
A…
CANADIAN!!!
100%
CERTAINTY!
…
TRY HARDER PEEPEE!
I’m not PEEPEE! I’m an independent, analytical thinker who works in a very prestigious profession and lives in a dynamic Canadian city!
and is peepee.
No it’s just some troll. You’re being played.
I’m not peepee! Do you realize how high my occupational status is? I literally stand on top of you. I’m GOD among Men!!
you’re not peepee…
just like Zombie isn’t…
PRO IRA…HA! HA! HA!
IN YOUR HEAD…
I R A…
SINN FEIN!
LET’S DO IT!
Someone tell ”anal”**
OR, si, sii,
analYTICAL
sorry
Cooper was not the first to attempt air piracy for personal gain. In early November 1971, for example, a Canadian man named Paul Joseph Cini hijacked an Air Canada DC-8 over Montana, but was overpowered by the crew when he put down his shotgun to strap on the parachute he had brought with him.
typical!
blame canada…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOR38552MJA
reminds me of the recently…supposedly exonerated canadian flight attendant…aka PATIENT ZERO…
GAETAN DUGAS.
peepee is so impressionable…
she doesn’t even know when americans are trying to “control her brain”.
what will it take to shake peepee from her worship of america and jewish cock and oprah’s clit?
unsolved mystery!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0bd_1184765135&comments=1
who knew that sociopath and autistic could combine in one person?
peepee!
so sad…
well peepee can always e-migrate…
she can leave canada for sentinel island…her homeland.
You’re just jealous because I have a normal human brain and you don’t. You thought that because of strange interests, I was just as fucked up as you, and are pissed that I’m not. Everyone here, even those with low IQs, are cognitively superior to you because your Theory of Mind is badly impaired by schizophrenia.
You complained I was making a category mistake by applying IQ scores to Homo Erectus because they don’t have a human brain, but the same applies to you. Giving you an IQ test is also a category mistake because your lack of Theory of Mind means you’ll never achieve behavioral modernity and everyone here is taking advantage of you and laughing at you.
But you’re not just inferior mentally. Your incredibly short legs, grotesquely long torso, and oversized head has caused you to become the town outcast who is not even welcome to walk your dog in the park.
Especially superior to you are the highly evolved East Asians who laugh at your stupidity and are thrilled to find a white man that they are physically superior to also:
my God chinks are hideous.
they are just so un-believably fucking ugly.
He sucks well, at least… 😉
Mugabe, they’re “more evolved” (even though east Asians and Europeans split ~6500 ya, so how are they ‘more evolved’?). So I guess being “more evolved” comes with being ugly.
Ain’t no beauty like a southern Italian. Fact.
”So I guess being “more evolved” comes with being ugly.”
So ”more evolved” = ”more” ”beauty”**
😉
”Ain’t no beauty like a southern Italian. Fact.”
”beauty” is not subjective*
And character is less important than ”beauty”*
eeee…(I)
arrrr…(R)
aaaaaaah…(A)
they are…
fightin’…
LISTEN!
eeeArrraaa*
for…
EVER…
let it ring…
the words of gandhi…
who wouldn’t prefer his own bad government to that of an alien power…
the chinks don’t have a chance!
not…
a…
chance!
it’s the same old team since since 1916…
why?
why didn’t the IRA hook up with the CPSU?
ha! ha!
it’s…
TOTALLY OBVIOUS!
let’s do it!
funny…
the best soviet (video) anthem is posted by a paki…chemist!
the chink coppied it from him…
let’s stop chinking around peepee.
ONCE A CHECKIST…
ALWAYS A CHECKIST…
ALWAYS A CHECKIST…
ALWAYS A CHECKIST…
……………………………..
LET’S DO IT!
contrary to peeppee’s worship of capital…and her worship of the solid yellow painting…
THE PRC LEADERSHIP ARE SOLID….
MARXISTS!
FROM Deng Xiaoping TO Xi Jinping…
THESE ARE MARXIST MOTHERFUCKERS!
NOT WHAT I WISH THEY WERE…
WHAT THEY REALLY ARE!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!