Pumpkin Person is officially endorsing Green Party candidate Jill Stein for President of the United States. Just watched this brilliant and moral woman and her fabulous VP pick Ajamu Baraka on CNN, and wow, what a breath of fresh air they were.
With a few exceptions, there’s been a complete media blackout of this woman preventing her to rise in the polls, which is why it’s so important for bloggers to endorse her. I watch cable news all the time, and tonight was the first time I’d ever even seen her.
What a shame it will be if Americans are denied an opportunity to see this excellent candidate debate Trump and Hillary because she doesn’t get the requisite 15% support needed to be in the debates.
But what few media appearances she’s been allowed to make have gained rave reviews.
Let’s watch Jill Stein in action:
And here’s Jill and Ajamu thanking us for watching their CNN town hall meeting:
Pumpkin Person 
She may be high IQ but her policies are very low IQ: wireless Internet gives you cancer, vaccinations cause autism, genetically-modified food is the devil, etc. She is also a climate-change extremist, who would probably be happy to officially forbid any dissent on climate issues. In brief, a typically shrill and self-righteous SWPL with an IQ of maybe 125-130, yet with startlingly low-IQ opinions.
And anyway you’re Canadian, right? So who cares? And what’s up with your boy-wonder PM pushing women around? He seems scary. Did you see that twitter photo of a photographer taking a picture of Trudeau signing his own photograph? Very meta, but in a creepy way.
God, vaccines don’t cause autism.
>An issue that is likely to be of concern to some readers regards the very stringent approach our committee has taken. For the majority of adverse events the committee was asked to examine, the committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship. Some might interpret that to mean either of the following statements:
>Because the committee did not find convincing evidence that the vaccine does cause the adverse event, the vaccine is safe.
>Because the committee did not find convincing evidence that the vaccine does not cause the adverse event, the vaccine is unsafe.
>Neither of these interpretations is correct. “Inadequate to accept or reject” means just that—inadequate. If there is evidence in either direction that is suggestive but not sufficiently strong about the causal relationship, it will be reflected in the weight-of-evidence assessments of the epidemiologic or the mechanistic data. However suggestive those assessments might be, in the end the committee concluded that the evidence was inadequate to accept or reject a causal association.
http://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/15#631
Here are a whole bunch of new articles.
http://www.immunize.org/journalarticles/conc_multi.asp
http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/mobile/article.aspx?articleid=1919642
Also see Barton (2013) and Matson (2012).
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/new-meta-analysis-confirms-no-association-between-vaccines-and-autism
An expanded definition of autism is the reason why. People really still believe that garbage
Climate change is natural. It’s fear mongering. Man made climate change don’t real.
Why this policies are “lower IQ”??
“Wireless cause cancer”
Or “eat eggs cause cardiovascular diseases”
“liberals” tend to be weak in cause & effect { correlation & causality }
Even many things they believe are epicenticaky wrong this doesn’t mean that all of it will be wrong.
“Vaccination cause autism?
There are some relates about it but well if vaccination cause autism this protect against schizophrenia?? 😉
“Genetically modified food is devil”
Monsanto as well most of mega corporations are evil. They only want money and power.
I’m more cautious about industrialized food.
To be extremist about climate change don’t seems soooooo bad
Worst and classical stupid is to deny the human role in the environmental destructions OR justify it.
Regarding Canada, it is now the lesser of 2 evils of the North American countries.
America is strictly a capitalistic country, and you know what happens when a corporate chain completely shuts down and layoffs all of its workers. Furthermore, I’m reading up on studies and it shows that American youths are just unprepared for the world. They are less educated than their Canadian peers. I checked out a vocational school in Montreal, and it seems like it cares for it students’ learning process, whereas in America, such a school is about siphoning money from them, and then leaving them in the dust.
No leader will save it, because of years and years of deliberate mismanagement and greed.
It’s going to get very ugly for America!
I agree with your old premise that identifying as a social liberal or conservative is a mini-IQ test. Accordingly, which candidate you endorse as a blogger (especially an anonymous blogger with nothing on the line) is essentially it’s own IQ test. The more intelligent you are, the more likely you are to endorse Stein. The less intelligent you are, the more likely you are to endorse Trump. I for one have never been surprised by Trump’s astonishing popularity with the less politically informed for an obvious reason: most people are not very intelligent. It really is that simple.
Bill Maher is fond of pointing out that as bad as politicians are, the masses are so stupid that they essentially deserve what they get. It’s a shame that he’s probably right. If Americans were collectively smarter, we’d have better options. Instead we have the options you’d expect a country with an average IQ of 97 to have.
The media blackout surrounding Jill Stein couldn’t be less surprising. Hilary supporters obviously don’t want her getting more attention since she’ll eat into Hilary’s votes and Trump supporters are repulsed by everything she stands for. And obviously the majority of the media falls into one camp or the other and essentially answers to no one other than their network owners, who generally have even stronger ties to non-green political parties.
This explain why IQ tests are not perfect intelligence tests.
Real smart people in politics know that
Politics is a big circus
Both opposite sides or entire poliical/ideological spectrum have some good and bad points
The “higher IQ” crowds are far to be pretty good THINKERS because capitalism has selected the quality of WORKERS.
If intelligence is the capacity to adapt to the novel situations and not status quo so to vote for Trump just because he supposedly want to reduce the mass immigration to the USA is a way to adapt to the novel situations because we and all of livng beings to adapt to survive, this is the end of finality and how much self aware about what you are dong, where you are and how knowledgeable you are about people, quintessentially smarter you will be…. And seems most of “higher IQ” people simply are not very self aware, don’t know where they are and who is your enemies, neutral and “friends’…. Because they are very good WORKERS but not so good THINKERS.
I agree, Tez.
It’s ironic that the Trumpkins/Alt-Right rave about Black IQs non-stop but never look in the Goddamn mirror.
I agree with you. The amount of misinformation I see is sad, especially when they use the guise of a race-realist.
They think that because they’re white their IQ is high. Idiots.
I think politics is a sham, voting does nothing if it did it wouldn’t be legal.
PP, plz.
It’s either Trumpstein or Shillary. I’m leaning towards Trumpstein winning. Nothing will change. Etc etc.
Also Stein is, obviously, a Jew. Why would I want a Jew openly running my country (I know the Jews run it in the shadows but that’s besides the point).
She had no chance PP.
Americans posting on this blog, is THIS who you want as President?
http://static1.squarespace.com/static/55efd193e4b0fe570119ac34/55fa6329e4b0af27e34abc19/573c18cac6fc087da45a5a40/1464250985994/Screen+Shot+2016-05-18+at+10.18.18.png?format=1000w
What a bizarre view for someone who normally writes such sensible material to take. As Trump would say: Sad!
In all seriousness though do you not think that the reality of HBD has favorable implications for anti-immigrant, anti-SJW, and anti-“diversity” political views?
You really think Trump isn’t like the rest?
As Trumpstein would say, sad!
He’s a good goy for Israel.
I am a race realist and a nationalist, but I am not a raving anti-Semite nor do I have a particularly negative view of Israel. The only real negative impact Israel has on us is, possibly, through influencing certain aspects of our foreign policy. However, Trump does not endorse neoconservative or neoliberal interventionism. Given this, his views on Israel are irrelevant, other than possibly suggesting how he will act in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is an issue I “side with” Israel on.
oh please, here we go with the bullshit segments of HBD…..
it’s “Appamotox” as Mugabe would say.
Yes, HBD would lend itself to an IQ-centric society, with less immigration from various groups. That being said, where is Nationalism justified? (hint, it’s not)
If we were to go completely HBD, we’d say get all the Immigrants we can from Asia and Punjab, since they are NE Asian and Aryan respectively and help our IQ themselves and through our offspring.
directed towards Sean, not RR.
P.S.
even if you believe in EGIs, it should make us “more aware” of our behavioral tendencies!
@Sean Last
“I am a race realist and a nationalist, but I am not a raving anti-Semite nor do I have a particularly negative view of Israel.”
Hmm. So you’re a race-realist and a nationalist, yet you think Israel is fine? Why don’t you have a negative view of Israel? The Jews shouldn’t even have a homeland, per their own books, until their Messiah comes back.
“The only real negative impact Israel has on us is, possibly, through influencing certain aspects of our foreign policy. ”
You can’t be serious…. Not like we and they helped create IS. Not like they siphon billions of tax-payer dollars from us every year. Not like they are using us to further the strife in the Middle East to cause more migration so they can expand for Greater Israel. Nope, The only “possibility” (are you even being serious right now?) is that they influence “certain aspects” of our foreign policy.
And Trumpsteinbergwitzman will be right there, helping his pal, Bibi.
“Trump does not endorse neoconservative or neoliberal interventionism. ”
Ahahahahahahah. Bro, I’m laughing my ass off right now.
Remember Bush in the run up to the election in 2000? He was Ron Paul-like. Then whoops!!! Israel carried out 9/11 then Sadaam “had WMDs” and we destroyed the Middle East for Israel to clear out for Greater Israel.
Trump will be just as bad, if not a worse war hawk than Hillary, Obama, or Bush will ever be.
Hint: He doesn’t want us to “look weak”, yet he wants to be a noninterventionist. Can’t have both, gotta choose one.
“Given this, his views on Israel are irrelevant”
Oh man, you Trump supporters are hilarious!!
How are they irrelevant? His bosses in Israel are going to tell him to attack Iran when the time comes, and like a good goy, he will do it. He LOVES Israel, his daughter and son married Jews and converted. His grandson is a Jew. He can flee to Israel at any time with his Jew family and be protected like the good goy that he is. “Trump’s views on Israel are irrelevant”! Thanks for the laugh bro.
“other than possibly suggesting how he will act in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is an issue I “side with” Israel on.”
So you’re a good goy too.
1) Israel shouldn’t have a homeland. It’s in their books that they are not to return to Canaan or create a new Home until their Messiah comes.
2) As a nationalist, shouldn’t the Palestinians also have a Nation? Seems extremely hypocritical to me that you think they don’t deserve a homeland.
Don’t even get me started on all of those false flag attacks a few years ago that the Jews did to the Palestinians. “O-oy vey!! A young Jewish boy was shoahed by a Palestinian!!!” Set off a small battle. A few weeks later “Hehehehe stupid goyim. It didn’t happen!!!”
Hamas is run by Israel by the way.
One last thing.
You say you’re a race-realist, yet support Israel. They hate us. Jews, ethnic interests, etc. This is a basic facet of race-realism. Maybe you didn’t get the memo.
William,
Well said. However, this guy seems confused. He says he’s a nationalist but to me it seems like he doesn’t believe the Palestinians should have a Nation. Then he says he’s a race-realist, yet it seems he sides with the Jews who siphon money from us and have our people die in wars for them.
Yes, back Israel! More blood for Israel!
Race realism does not equate a hatred for jews. Every individual has ethnic genetic interests.
Melo,
I know that. I’m just saying, Sean Last says he’s a race-realist, but he likes Jews. He should know that Jews have much stronger genetic interests, in my opinion (maybe the Arabs eek them out) due to inbreeding. But it’s like he’s dismissing Israel as “not a problem” when a lot of our problems as a country can be traced back to Israel and the Jews.
“Sean Last says he’s a race-realist, but he likes Jews. He should know that Jews have much stronger genetic interests,”
That statement^ does not make any sense whatsoever. I am a race realist and have no real problem with jews. Jew’s “suppression” of whites is due to EGi whites do the same to blacks it’s not even a racism thing either it’s just individuals prefer their “own kind”. Now your criticism would make sense if he said he was a white nationalist.
Melo,
Meh. I see where you’re coming from. Though, anyone who knows even the basics of race-realism should know that Jews have a much stronger genetic interest, which then has them screw over their host population. Expulsion from over 100 locations. That says it all really.
If Jews didn’t undermine us and all that good stuff, I’d have no problem with them at all. But I’m not an idiot, I see what’s going on and I can put 2 and 2 together, which make 4 and not 5 as Obama says.
Knowing that EGI is true (https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/16/ethnic-genetic-interests-and-group-selection-does-exist-a-reply-to-jayman-2/), anyone who is a race-realist should immediately know what this means for populations and how they view others (barring media indoctrination as is currently happening in the West, the East doesn’t have that problem).
All I’m saying is, is that any politically-minded, race-realist shouldn’t like Jews. Since that person knows politics and race-realism, 2 and 2 should be put together and that’s what you get.
MeLo-
I do think it’s true that Jews do have stronger Genetic Interests with one another, or should theoretically (I differ from RR in that I do believe it is not inherent in Jews to have a desire to kill Whites, Jews do better with us, than without us).
I read a genetic study that found the combination of breaking into a new Ethnicity just 1000 years ago, combined with isolation/inbreeding has made all Jews VERY closely related to each other. As much as 3rd cousins with one another!
I’ll see if I can find the link.
I’ve seen that study before. But Razib says that they aren’t that inbred.
It was “Oy vey! Jews are 30th cousins”
http://www.livescience.com/47755-european-jews-are-30th-cousins.html
Jews definitely do better with us. They can’t live without us.
That last comment was of course in reference to solely Ashkenazis.
and yes, RR is correct that it’s ironic that a “Nationalist” doesn’t want the Palestinians to have a state!
“Though, anyone who knows even the basics of race-realism should know that Jews have a much stronger genetic interest,”
Why? because they’re inbred? I guess that’s sensible but, judaism is a religion not a race. it just has ethnic roots to it, ashkenazis look almost completely white. Secondly wouldn’t this be a stronger case for them having a homeland? or Should we just exterminate the jews that way they wont harm white people again?
“Expulsion from over 100 locations. That says it all really.”
Yes people do not like it when A more intelligent group prospers over them especially in their own “turf”
“All I’m saying is, is that any politically-minded, race-realist shouldn’t like Jews.”
Complete garbage, why don’t you whine some more? You sound like a nigger trying to blame his stupidity on whitey. Even if jews are more ethnically aggressive, to make generalizations like that is fucking illogical. You sound just like a nazi.
“That last comment was of course in reference to solely Ashkenazis.”
I figured as much, jews are not that inbred.
“Why? because they’re inbred? I guess that’s sensible but, judaism is a religion not a race. it just has ethnic roots to it, ashkenazis look almost completely white. Secondly wouldn’t this be a stronger case for them having a homeland? or Should we just exterminate the jews that way they wont harm white people again?”
Of course it’s a religion and not a race. But converts aren’t looked at the same as regular Jews. You know they cluster separately. The Jews are supposed to be wandering until their Messiah comes back. Only then can they make a State. Even then, as you can see, the Jews need us. They can’t function without us.
“Yes people do not like it when A more intelligent group prospers over them especially in their own “turf””
What is usury?
“Complete garbage, why don’t you whine some more? You sound like a nigger trying to blame his stupidity on whitey. Even if jews are more ethnically aggressive, to make generalizations like that is fucking illogical. You sound just like a nazi.”
Jewish behavior is pathological. Jung wrote about it. Kevin Macdonald wrote about it. How is it illogical to make generalizations like that? Blacks commit more crime than Whites. Whites are more intelligent than blacks. Wear African descended blacks are better sprinters. Caucasoids and Asians are better at strength. Those are generalizations and they are true.
I prefer the term “National Socialist”.
Jews aren’t that inbred, you’re right. But Ashkenazi Jews are, more so. This is part of the reason why they’re so ethnocentric.
Other than Palestinian oppression, I see no reason why people would group non-Ashkenazis with Ashkenazis.
They’re simply not the same, have very different histories, etc.
They all share a common lineage though. Mizrahi Jews, and Sephardics do.
MeLo-
Ashkenazis were initially persecuted for religion, then as the persecution increased, they had some rough natural selection, then intelligence increased, after which they were persecuted for that.
Yes, it was intelligence, but Jews were “Banksters” too. Intelligent people can do bad stuff, and resentment from others comes easy.
RR- but the elements of Jews that you hate, didn’t come from that lineage. It came specifically from their activities in Europe.
Willie yes I know. But all Jews way back share a common lineage. The European Jews through usury is what I dislike. And it’s still continuing today. Our ancestors weren’t stupid.
Generalizations: ” ALL Jews are like that”
The correct would “averagezitation” or correct proportion
Really know what the percent of Jews who are totally aware about ita permissive attitudes
The worst “they” tend to do is to use the kindness to their own selfish and sociopathic goals
Even we know that is not ALL are like that most people even us are vulnerable to think in that way
Thanks for clarifying for me Santo.
Never forget that Jesus was Sephardic/Mizrahi……
he’s had a HUGE influence on Civilization, it really was perhaps one of the most important parts to it.
Jesus may have been Phonecian.
Don’t matter if Jewdaism is religion or race or a ethno religion… Matters it’s attitudes.
This explain why “civilization” is this trash 😋
“But converts aren’t looked at the same as regular Jews.”
So you’re telling me if a white guy with a big nose converted he wouldn’t be treated the same? The only way people are actually able to look out for their EGI is through appearance, There is no way for them to magically detect different lineages, so they have to rely on phenotype.
“The Jews are supposed to be wandering until their Messiah comes back. Only then can they make a State.”
Why in the hell would we follow what their religious book says?
“How is it illogical to make generalizations like that?”
Because you can’t just hate the few off the actions of the many it’s ignorant, and i feel it only serves to induce prejudice. Ya blacks are dumb but not all of them and I definitely don’t hate them for it.
MeLo- as I’ve said, I’m a Judeophile…I’ve explained my reasons in discussions with Mugabe….
that being said, in a quest for “Nationalism”, Israel is running a state that is beyond Apartheid South Africa with regards to the Palestinians. They’ve cut off water to them, they force them to live in slums, crowded ones at that.
At least in Apartheid South Africa, there were large tracts of land/whole provinces where a Black could theoretically farm and have full rights as citizens.
Gaza? Nope.
West Bank? *Doesn’t really have any Palestinian land anymore*.
Bibi needs to resign in disgrace. That being said, Hamas is corrupt and ridicolous, and I don’t like them either.
Israel is one of only two de Jure Ethnostates (the other being Liberia), this is NOT something that is seen as a positive in the modern day!
MeLo-
look into Israel and the Palestinians.
Worse than Apartheid South Africa.
I’m not a racial anti-semite, my DNA test has turned up some Sephardic and Ashkenazi ancestry.
But I’m willing to call a spade a spade.
Pro-Israel, just not pro-Netanyahu.
”Never forget that Jesus was Sephardic/Mizrahi……”
jewsuis ”was” ashkenazzi (in the plural, 😉 )
”he’s had a HUGE influence on Civilization, it really was perhaps one of the most important parts to it.”
explain why ”just” in the XIX people started to ”believe” that ”man” evolved from nature and not from the divin
In the 0 year, no there this subdivisions of jewish ppl
Santoculto-
yes, but that’s like saying a Black who existed before Caucasians broke off wasn’t really Black.
(He was)
“phenotypically Negroid”, as PP said.
Santoculto- religion is perhaps, in theory, the most important non-evolutionary aspect driving people’s lives.
Isn’t your own name a religious reference of some sort?!?!?!?
”Santoculto- religion is perhaps, in theory, the most important non-evolutionary aspect driving people’s lives.
Isn’t your own name a religious reference of some sort?!?!?!?”
Religion is culture, culture is religion, i thought you’re talking about culture, evolved first.
Just because ”Santo”**
”Santoculto-
yes, but that’s like saying a Black who existed before Caucasians broke off wasn’t really Black.
(He was)”
I don’t think ”Jesus” really existed
and i don’t think even he had existed this is not remotely important.
Jesus is a character
or you believe he was a paranormal human*
Jesus was the X-man of the Palestine, 😉
“Israel is running a state that is beyond Apartheid South Africa with regards to the Palestinians. They’ve cut off water to them, they force them to live in slums, crowded ones at that. Israel is one of only two de Jure Ethnostates (the other being Liberia), this is NOT something that is seen as a positive in the modern day!”
I understand all if that, but it still doesn’t invalidate my point. Anti semitism does not equate with HBD, neither is it the appropriate reaction to the situation because it oversimplifies the main issue. I am by no means pro Israel.
MeLo- no, it’s not justification for that type of thing, you’re right. HBD might tell us that Jews are behaving more “primitively” than others, in spite of high IQ. PP says Israeli Ashkenazis score lower than American Jews because they are more “ethnocentric”/”tribal”, however American Jews love Israel, too. It’s been said that even large chunks of the most progressive of them suddenly lose this when it comes to Israel.
I mean do you have sources?
MeLo-
Dem Sen. Chuck Schumer back out of the Iran deal.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/why-senator-chuck-schumer-is-opposing-the-iran-deal/400736/
Bibi attempts to get Florida Jews (Jews are mostly Democrat) to go against Obama because he is anti-Israel, etc.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/20/netanyahu-star-new-election-ad-airing-in-florida.html
IQ seems is correlated with the capacity of the brain to internalize novel cognitively techcnical informations caused by human “self” domestication. So greater % of higher IQ people seems are more domesticated and less instinctive. Instinctive people have less brain to”learn’ / internalize novel rules/informations but they will be comparatively more naturalistic/instinctive smart. Explain partially Trump supporters and never Trump supporters.
I find it ironic that on unz.com, all of these brilliant writers never say a negative thing about trump.
It gets on my nerves. Iliana Mercer is the worst with that. Say one negative thing about Trump and you get jumped on.
My fave is how he’s attracted to his daughter. Sick fuck. He also loves Israel. Like all the rest.
And what generally happen she NEVER said anything realistically wrong about his tribe…
Mercer posts are always to blame some peripheral aspects of the western decadence
And obviously many gullible whitey readers believe biblically…
If you’re an immigration restrictionist, Trump is your best bet, whatever his other flaws.
I actually think he’s got a proven record as a scam artist, but if elected, he would have strong pressure to actually beef up border security, etc. Even if not elected he’s pushed the center of political gravity on the right well toward restrictionism. The next Marco Rubio can’t push for amnesty.
He’ll probably find ways to divert huge amounts of money into his pockets…but he may be the best chance.
@SFG
Drumpf won’t do a thing. I’d love for his policies to come to fruition but I’m not gullible enough to believe it.
Clever sillies tend to be the people who believe that new emperor clothe is amazing … And the new emperor clothe today is “vote for Trump is ultimately dumb and low class”.
http://www.amren.com/news/2016/08/evidence-of-contemporary-polygenic-selection-on-the-big-g-of-national-cognitive-ability/
Fertility or fecundity?
“IQ” correlates with lower fertility but “higher IQ people” tend to be less fecund or less biologically fertile??
Some people have less kids because they are biologically less fertile?? “or” some people simply rationalize that less kids are less expensive?
I was wondering that as well, are lower IQ people actually more fertile through genetics or is it just because of their high impulsitivity?
According Rushton ”et all” twins pregnancy is more common among black Africans, and less common among East Asians and this tends to reflect differences in IQ is not*
People who are more prone to have twins tend to score lower or below-average in cognitive tests*
High impulsivity is a behavioral cause obviously
”Greater” (”more evolved” 😉 ) ‘intelligence’ is directly causal to the lower fertility potential* Or is correlated*
Santo is right.
I’m right why??
I do agree, though, her running mate is nuts.
Such extreme leftist views on race are not good for anyone.
-Cuck.
What are his views on race?
That the post-Charlie Hebdo march of world leaders was a “White power March”
that Obama is a closet White supremacist, etc.
or rather, that Obama doesn’t talk about racism enough and should avoid Economic conferences abroad because Blacks are so underrepresented in such things.
Is elite supremacism the greater disgrace of humankind
Santo does bring up an interesting point (or at least he reminded me of it);
it seems the reason that so many Economic Leftists have turned to progressive views of race, is that the reason race is perceived as positive or negative, is the wealth of that race. I.E. Blacks are almost universally poor and powerless.
Here in the states many ‘run of the mill’ White folk love Jews because they are celebrities, and wealthy (even if this is a subconsciousness bias).
I.E. it’s part of the “progressive cause” to help “poor people” and eradicate massive wealth gaps……
I.E. the most acute being Black and White.
However, they are leaving behind so many others they should want to help in this process.
Willie,
i don’t understand your point.
Liberals like poor.
Blacks=Poor
Liberals hence like Blacks.
I don’t think ”liberals” like poor,
the ”Sanders supporters” variety generally DISLIKE rich THAN necessarily like poor.
Certain variety of the ”Liberals” see themselves in the ”loser side” of natural selection/food chain, so they want to ”fight” to their side if most of them are self-interested and against ”naturalistic way of life/select”…
no doubt that ”liberalism” want to transcende usual naturalistic way of life = select for superficial quality like: beauty, material wealth, etc…
and ”they” are far to be wrong.
the great debate is
how conciliate naturalistic/pragmatically cold transcendence (superficial quality) with philosophical/ideal transcendence (intrinsic quality)**
example, most of conservatives, specially men, laugh about ”inner-beauty”, very liberal concept. Why**
Because they tend to interact with the world following/searching for superficial qualitative attributes, basically phenotype/body, the continuity of old-style selection
Conservatives tend to have lower emotional intelligence, even at the point to say ”no there such thing emotional intelligence”.
While, at priore, and in the perfect temperature and pressure, ”liberals” tend to select for behavior, so race no have meaningful importance… it’s just the ”color do skin”, what matter is the character, is not*
Go libertarian.
For each his own.
Pretty HBD, right?
Gary Johnson 2016.
if only he wasn’t open borders…
I’ll probably be voting for Hillary, though (*sigh*)
Go libertarian.
Willie,
He’s pro-TPP too.
ah. Of course.
Rand Paul would’ve been better.
Nationalism is not inherently supported HBD, and only a low-IQ alt-reicher would think so.
People from the dumbest groups on earth can be Nationalists….
think about it………………
an Alt-Reicher thinking, lol
cue the;
“ur stoopid and rong! Tromp is going to kell the Koloreds cuz they is eval and steeling frm us”
“HBD”
“Nashionelism”
Bro I’ve seen the most delusional statements from what these people think Drumpfstein is going to do. It’s comical. Andrew Anglin is the worst offender of this. Him and his ‘Stormer Troll Army’ (what faggots) think he’s the ‘God Emperor’. What’s with this worship of him? Sounds pretty gay to me.
I look for Trumpstein in the opportunistic way and not because I like him.
But he can be even more illusional than I’m thought.
Lets say I went into a coma the night before election day and woke up 2 years later.
If I didn’t read the newspaper, or watch TV, and none of my friends, family or coworkers talked politics, would I even be able to tell if Trump or Hillary won?
https://books.google.com.br/books?id=6jNniq7Ji7YC&pg=PA315&lpg=PA315&dq=jews+and+verbal+giftedness&source=bl&ots=05lZjG4OcV&sig=sl1uM1R2LXui2g0VbzOCawhsqT8&hl=pt-BR&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQ_Le6oc7OAhVBhpAKHYA4Aa4Q6AEIITAA#v=onepage&q=jews%20and%20verbal%20giftedness&f=false
People say that ”jews” no have greater achievements before XIX… but this book say otherwise
this part seems interesting
Pumpkin,
If memory serves, you’ve said in the past that black conservatives should be the stupidest of blacks, because not only are they conservative (negatively correlated with intellect), but they vote against their genetic interests as well. Forgive me if this is an unfair representation of your views.
I disagree for two reasons. 1) a black person voting conservative rejects the herd mentality of that ethnic group to vote democrat, demonstrating the ability to think independently. 2) More importantly, liberal policies are not in fact in the genetic interest of the black community.
The liberal policies that you presume play to blacks advantage, such as welfare programs, do indeed work well in the short term. But over the long term they have crippled the black community. The best (or rather, worst) example is the aid to single mothers programs. Begun in the 50s and expanded in the 60s under LBJ, these programs systematically disincentivised marriage in the black community, which in turn led to greater rates of single motherhood. Kids raised without dads are far more likely to flunk out of school, get involved in crime, and bear fatherless kids themselves. Over the last 50 years, this has shattered the black community and is why, despite five decades of racial reconciliation, the black American is worse off today than he was at the end of Jim Crow.
It takes a sober mind to look past the short-term benefit of welfare aid and see the long-term disadvantages associated with dependency. Therefore, I’d wager that conservative blacks are some of the very smartest of their race.
I’d be obliged to hear your thoughts on the matter.
Excellent & timely comment with trumps recent black outreach. I’ll respond in my next post, but right now, I’m off to get drunk
I made this comment to PP not too long ago:
Conservative Blacks are smarter than Liberal blacks. The reverse holds true for Whites.
But the White elites of both political camps are smarter than their voting base.
What’s also interesting and ironic, is that liberal blacks are actually very conservative in their way of life, more so than their conservative counterparts. They are the most uninteresting group of people with the least amount of worldliness. Because to many smart and educated people, dumb people are boring and incurious about the world.
That’s one of Trump’s “failure to adapt” type things.
He really could have done his Black appeal better.
Instead of denying that he knew who David Puke was, couldn’t he have just said “I denounce David Duke, but I also denounce ‘Model Minority'(Asian Nationalist) and ‘La Raza’ “, he would have pissed off Asian and Hispanics, but they hate him anyway, and such remarks would be enough for the Alt-Right too, while doing nothing to alienate Blacks.
Just an idea…
PP you got brought up here.
“So, intelligence is heritable because it isn’t highly adaptive. This would seem to refute Pumpkin Person, who claims intelligence is the very ability to adapt to circumstances.”
http://www.unz.com/gnxp/why-its-not-surprising-west-africans-dominate-sprinting/
Comment number 51
Great discovery! I never would have known about that had you not mentioned it. Thanks.
Steve Seiler define race such a ”enlarged family”, but not.
Race is a invariably restricted diversity of similar and stabilized overlap of phenotypes that are expressed at collective levels.
I agree with this. All co-ethnics are related on the magnitude of 2nd cousins.
But you can have a mixed race population with similar kin degrees… just look to the ”real friends”, similar situation.
brazilian mixed race people ARE NOT the same than ethiopians… at least by now
ethiopians are old, relatively isolated and phenotypically stabilized group, sub-race, a proto-race, ”phenotypically identified and invariably restricted”, very blonde ethiopians are non-existent,
other example, baltids tend to be rare among spaniards, portugueses, italians.
brazilian mixed race people tend to be phenotypically unstable… ”they” (we) are a recent overlap of the different races and its subraces… a plurality of subraces is not the same than a subrace itself… in the same way a plurality of fruits is no the same than a apple.
usually subraces tend to more genetically dominant than frankly mixed race populations, of course, depending the pairs of mixing, for example, if a polish woman marry a southern french man, and have kids, one of them can born with slightly-to-significative baltid features and other son can born with more mediterranid features.
the probability to have a baltid is higher between a polish couple than a polish/southern french couple.
the degree of phenotypical randomness will tend to be lower than when you marry a mixed race person.
indians are also a mixed subrace people with certain degree of phenotypical stabilization.
Race itself is not enlarged family, enlarged family IS one feature of the race, a effect.
Race is what i already talked above.
invariably restricted diversity of similar and stabilized overlap of phenotypes that are expressed at collective levels.
Other question is that
nationalities, specially in the modern states, are not the same than subraces
we already knew about it, i thought.
When I debated Marsha about Jews wanting to kill Whites, VIA EGIs, that’s one thing that came up……..
that Jews, at least Ashkenazis, are 60% Hybridized, 60% European, and the other 40% is SW Asian/very close….she said it was what we’ve been ‘programmed- culturally’,
but is that even *biological*? Nope.
EGIs, exist, but not in terms of nationality, culture, or anything of that sort, perhaps phenotypes, but considering traits are also distributed Gaussian, EGIs would be weak when it comes to race/ethnicity, only a slight ‘preference’.’
(see the table further down on the page);
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Racialism
I can’t take the link seriously.
I would assume that the table itself- the raw data is correct.
Although many conclusions are probably wrong.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/figure/fig1/
”60% Hybridized, 60% European, and the other 40% is SW Asian/very close”
what*
and the other*
I think both,
it’s cultural but is not possible not to be biological too, no chance.
Culture is the way humans find to pass their partially-learned — life-strategy to the next generations/their sons and
culture organize and drive the invariably amalgamated instinct we have…
culture get together a plurality of individuals into a collectivity, just like this
It explain the rule of older relatives in almost cultures, without this transference, culture is likely to become disorganized (people will be free to do what we want to do, it’s not exactly bad… at priore) and also vulnerable, the expiral of the cultural death, what has happened among western nations
just like this
is not happening a intergenerational transference inter-generations. The new church in the highly technological society is the technology itself via internet, tv, etc
Young (and non-philosophically gifted nor more instinctive) people in ”western” ”learn” its behavioral rules from tv and not from relatives, who also are dependent from other ways than itself to learn about the world and to infer minimally correct factual conclusions -and- actions.
Summarizing
most people on the west are DEPENDENT from others to understand in the minimally correct way how the world work, ”dependent-‘thinkers” ”.
culture look like a walking stick to someone who can’t think independently and minimally correct.
I’m amused Pumpkin Person leans this far to the left. 😉
Generally I’m reluctant to vote for extreme lefties or righties because they tend to be poor administrators. That’s separate from the actual policies they promote–I’m in favor of national health insurance, for example.
I’m extremely left on foreign policy, and borderline libertarian on economic issues. But foreign policy trumps economic issues for me because they’re life or death and affect the whole world.
Ron Paul’s foreign policy was best. Trump will be a war hawk, for Iran specifically. Notice how the countries getting attacked and the ones we always have “problems with” and all of these “terror groups” come out of surround Israel? It’s the plan for them to expand for Greater Israel.
http://www.unz.com/article/war-is-realizing-the-israelizing-of-the-world/
The Green Party say they wish to create a peaceful, egalitarian, democratic world in which all of humanity enjoys a high quality of life on a climate stable planet whose ecosystems and the biodiversity they harbor are secure, healthy and intact for present and future generations. These are laudible goals. Unfortunately, the Green Party’s policies, if they were ever able to enact them, would swiftly bring about the collapse of American civilization at the very least, plunge the rest of the world into the biggest economic depression in history, bring about environmental destruction on an unprecedented scale, probably cause the starvation of many millions of people and very likely lead to widespread armed conflict.
Unfortunately, the Green Party’s policies, if they were ever able to enact them, would swiftly bring about the collapse of American civilization at the very least, plunge the rest of the world into the biggest economic depression in history, bring about environmental destruction on an unprecedented scale, probably cause the starvation of many millions of people and very likely lead to widespread armed conflict.
What policies in particular, and why?
Well, let’s just look at one policy (because there are *many* and my time is limited).
The Greens call for a ban on chemical fertilizers.
Half of the nitrogen in your body is there because of nitrogen fertilizer created by the Haber–Bosch process, where hydrogen is combined with molecular nitrogen at high temperature under high pressure to form ammonia. Half of humanity exists because of this process.
If the Greens succeeded in banning chemical fertilizer, agricultural yields would immediately drop by about 50%. In order to prevent half of the US population from starving to death, land used for agriculture would have to double from ~45% to ~90% of the nation’s land area. That would mean deforestation on a grand scale, which would be disastrous to all the wildlife that depend on the existence of US forests for habitat. It would also mean the release into the atmosphere of gigatonnes of carbon currently sequestered in those forests.
Because food would be harder to produce (because it would have to be sown and harvested across twice the area), it would be more expensive, which would leave Americans poorer. Due to increased demand for it, land prices would also be pushed higher, which would make everything that uses land (like houses) more expensive. This effect would serve to impoverish Americans further. The net impact, from an economic perspective, would be contractionary.
The Greens’ policy to ban GMO crops would exacerbate the above scenario. The resulting lower yields would lead to expanded agricultural (and thus environmental) footprint, higher food prices and lower household incomes.
The Greens’ policy to ban pesticides would also exacerbate the above scenario via the same mechanisms.
Obviously, even if just the aforementioned Green policies were implemented worldwide, it would be a human and environmental disaster.
It really is a supreme irony that the Green party calls itself Green. They’re anything but.
The problem with the system now, the Capitalist system, is the Thatcheristic policy on monetary things.
The government pumping stimulus, via zero interest loans, into the economy, is making it okay for large companies NOT to take risk, and not to hire people, and ironically keeps inflation near zero.
This is the exact criticism of socialism, yet it’s already happening.
God knows these right wingers can barely string together a sentence….
so I have to talk about this with left wingers…
the velocity of money cratered in japan, and it’s cratering in les etats unis merdeux.
…
the stock market is supported in part by “buy back recapitalizations”…
but the main reason for its recent all time highs is that bond yields suck.
it’s always ok not to take risk peepee.
that businesses can substitute leverage for real growth is a very small part of the problem.
…
why did you give up the santa claus shtick?
“but the main reason for its recent all time highs is that bond yields suck.”
Duh. Italy recently put out a very lengthy 50 year bond.
“that businesses can substitute leverage for real growth is a very small part of the problem.”
There could be something a prole like me is not seeing below the surface.
i’ve heard about this borrowing to buy back shares, but it must be a small minority of s&p 500 companies according to this chart:
it appears that these companies are being just as stupid as krugman says the federal government is being…not borrowing and investing when the money is cheap.
here’s another article:
According to Bloomberg data, the debt-to-Ebitda, debt-to-equity, and debt-to-assets ratios for the S&P 500 Index are all well below their historical averages since 1990. The U.S. is not alone. All three ratios for the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index are also well below their historical averages since 1995 (for both the S&P 500 and ACWI ex-USA, the first year for which data is available).
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2016-02-08/about-that-29-trillion-in-corporate-debt
but certainly investors should take advantage of the very low margin rates and try to find the tangent point on the efficient frontier. but most of them are too fucking retarded to do this.
when the largest company by market cap ever is a toy maker, AAPL…
this explains it.
that is, whatever the business enterprise it has nothing more it can do. all of them are…
1. about as automated as they can be or their executives know they can be, or they’ve outsourced to countries with super cheap labor.
2. they have nothing new to offer, just the old more cheaply…if that.
so i expect material progress for the next 20 years, if there is any, will largely be in deflation. this is what has happened to japan. the whole world is being japanified.
3. even the drug companies’ pipelines are dry…medical miracles are NOT on the horizon.