
Despite being more evolved, Asian foreign exchange student can’t land the white girl who bunks under him in John Hughes’s adorable 80s classic Sixteen Candles
Way back in 1980s, when many North Americans were first learning about East Asians through weird and exotic comical stereotypes in movies like Sixteen Candles:
It was against this backdrop that scholar J.P. Rushton proclaimed “Orientals” the most advanced of the three main races, in part because they diverged from the human evolutionary tree more recently than the rest of us.
“One theoretical possibility is that evolution is progressive, and that some populations are more advanced than others,” said Rushton.
At the time of Rushton’s ground breaking research, DNA science was in its infancy. Now a quarter century later, it seems Rushton was right. Research from 2013 shows East Asians are a genetically very young race, suggesting they might be genetically less primitive than the rest of us:
The study also found that Europeans had more harmful mutations than Africans did, due to their race being “diluted” twice over 30,000 years ago which caused “bad” mutations to build up in the European population. Bustamante calls this a “genetic echo.” Most Non-Africans descended from a small group of migrants who left the African continent 50,000 to 100,000 years ago.
The study also revealed that Native Americas showed less genetic diversity than Europeans. Its proof that the part of the world they lived in was the last to be settled. They are descendents of the Yakruts of Eastern Siberia who entered North America about 10,000 years ago.
The researchers study proved that life did start in Africa with Africans having the greatest amount of genetic diversity, followed by Middle Easterners, then Europeans, South Asians and finally East Asians.
There is no such thing as ‘superior’. Only when you look at certain traits.
““One theoretical possibility is that evolution is progressive, and that some populations are more advanced than others,” said Rushton.”
I argued about evolution speed elsewhere with someone who has no idea what they’re talking about. He says that Europeans are more evolved than Africans. That’s so stupid. Here’s who people like that sound like saying there are more evolved humans than another.
“Something must have happened to weaken the selective pressure drastically. We cannot escape the conclusion that man’s evolution towards manness has suddenly come to a halt.” – Ernst Mayr
“There’s been no biological change in humans in 40,000 of 50,000 years. Everything we call culture and civilization we’ve built with the same body and brain.” – Steven Jay Gould
Sounds similar to me. Evolution doesn’t increase or decrease for certain groups. That’s a retarded notion.
Seems East Asians lack empathy too.
East Asians’ lack of pro-social behavior is what made the West superior, and China, an irrelevant “center of the world” or backwater. And its citizens generally hate one another, which is why China will not take the center stage in the future. Ever visit a Chinatown? Its residents repel each other like polar opposites. Despite their higher IQs, most East Asians live in low trust societies.
What does “more evolved” mean anyway? How do you quantify this?
More evolve = More dynamic in nature
East Asians are the least dynamic of the higher functioning groups. I’ve said this many times.
Euros, Middle Easterners, South Asians and East Asians, in the order from most evolved to less evolved.
Behavioral profiles of Whites are the most varied. East Asians are the least varied.
And the idea of the polymath (someone who is multi talented in several disparate fields) has no place with East Asians.
More evolved seems like more worked/ selected/ distant from the basal populations.
African subsaarians tends to display more “primate like” behavior for example the American elections. Almost of African Americans has voed in Obama just or specially because he’s visible afro descendent. This kind of extreme tribal behavior is common nonhuman fauna. No rationality there.
They also look visibly more primate like while Europeans tend to look much less primates specially the gracilized and progressive ones.
Unless PP is suggesting that East Asians still have time to evolve, which is a form of dynamic energy, but it doesn’t appear this way.
Europeans are phenotypically evolved
Jews are mentally evolved
East Asians are biologically evolved
Susaharian Africans are sexually evolved
“It was against this backdrop that scholar J.P. Rushton proclaimed “Orientals” the most advanced of the three main races, in part because they diverged from the human evolutionary tree more recently than the rest of us.”
PP go in depth on how that makes East Asians more evolved please. You defended your point very well on African IQ, which I will respond to later.
Race realist
I’ve blogged in depth about it
https://pumpkinperson.com/2014/10/11/is-evolution-progressive/
https://pumpkinperson.com/2014/12/21/are-some-populations-more-evolved-than-others/
I still don’t buy it. You say that evolution is progressive, but it isn’t always.
Other ways for evolution include – as you know – migration, mutation and genetic drift which may make them less suitable for their environment.
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a3
Evolution isn’t a linear process.
I still think there is no way to quantify ‘more evolved’.
I still don’t buy it. You say that evolution is progressive, but it isn’t always
but you asked if East Asians are more evolved.
Yes they are because they occupy a more advances branch on our evolutionary tree
Of course more evolved doesn’t always mean progress…sometimes evolution goes backwards
”Evolution isn’t a linear process.”
Or evolution –generally— isn’t a linear process but can be…
but usually evolution tend to be a synonimous to the ”progress”.
clay (human* 😉 ) will becoming a jar
we have basal/primary human populations and a distant-from-the-evolutionary basis populations
For example, what is the % of primates who have proeminent chin and zero prognatism*
seems nonexistent among them
but this traits are common among europeans
Europeans also no have this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_spot
on avg all macro-human populations no have a complete ADVANTAGEOUS constelations of biological (behavioral) traits, specially in the dynamics we have lived.
To say ”east asians” are evolved after all ”progress” that caucasian”s” has done since a long time and based on anthropological evidence of absence of many common primate phenotypical traits seems slightly … politically correct
And I don’t care what your GRE scores were
Your wechsler scores prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you’re not intelligent
So stop monopolizing my time so i can attend to my other commenters
”So stop monopolizing my time so i can attend to my other commenters”
but but
you respect the common right to the free speech
=(
i remember…
Whos talking about GRE scores?
“but you asked if East Asians are more evolved.”
They aren’t more evolved.
“Yes they are because they occupy a more advances branch on our evolutionary tree”
“But I can’t help but notice that the most intelligent populations seem to be descendanded from more splits and forks in the evolutionary tree. ”
Meaningless. Groups with high intelligence need a bigger population size to infer mutations. This is why the Inuit have a brain size the same as East Asians but an IQ of only 91 because they don’t have a big population size to get mutations for higher IQ.
“Of course more evolved doesn’t always mean progress…sometimes evolution goes backwards”
Then it wouldn’t be “more evolved” if it’s backward. The point about evolution not always being progressive, as you say, is that species can get mutations not suitable to their environment, showing that evolution is not always a progressive phenomena.
Santo,
“on avg all macro-human populations no have a complete ADVANTAGEOUS constelations of biological (behavioral) traits, specially in the dynamics we have lived.”
Right. There are superior groups for their environment, but to attempt quantify a superior group is retarded. Because one group may not survive as well in a certain environment in comparison to another group. The term superiority when talking about human races is retarded. Superiority only arises for humans when talking about one or a few traits.
“To say ”east asians” are evolved after all ”progress” that caucasian”s” has done since a long time and based on anthropological evidence of absence of many common primate phenotypical traits seems slightly … politically correct”
They aren’t. Just because they’re the newest branch on the tree doesn’t mean they’re more evolved.
Saying a race is more evolved is like saying that evolution has stopped, or slowed for that matter, for a few groups. Some quotes from anti-evolutionists:
To say there are people more evolved is the opposite end of the spectrum of of denying human evolution. Have you read the 10000 Year Explosion, PP?
Meaningless. Groups with high intelligence need a bigger population size to infer mutations. This is why the Inuit have a brain size the same as East Asians but an IQ of only 91 because they don’t have a big population size to get mutations for higher IQ.
A more evolved group can be less intelligent than a less evolved group, because how evolved you are is not measured by IQ, it’s measured by how much taxonomic change has occurred between each group and their common ancestor.
To say there are people more evolved is the opposite end of the spectrum of of denying human evolution.
Do you believe humans are more evolved than crocodiles?
Have you read the 10000 Year Explosion, PP?
Unfortunately.
Whos talking about GRE scores?
Trumpocalypse (aka “Mug of Pee”/Jizzela)
”Meaningless. Groups with high intelligence need a bigger population size to infer mutations. This is why the Inuit have a brain size the same as East Asians but an IQ of only 91 because they don’t have a big population size to get mutations for higher IQ.”
This was already proved**
I thought groups need just select to the higher intelligence, don’t need increase their population size,
Parsees and ashkenazis…
Inuit and other americo-mongolid groups don’t evolved to the higher intelligence just because they don’t select for, period.
”Right. There are superior groups for their environment, but to attempt quantify a superior group is retarded. Because one group may not survive as well in a certain environment in comparison to another group. The term superiority when talking about human races is retarded. Superiority only arises for humans when talking about one or a few traits.”
Yes this is the mister Pritchard syndrome what i already talked here…
What i also talked, there are some inter-group superiority but
it’s pretty nuanced
pretty relative
and likely to change, this is not fixed
”Saying a race is more evolved is like saying that evolution has stopped, or slowed for that matter, for a few groups.”
I don’t think that one cancel other.
Seems is not ”like saying that evolution has stopped” but that evolution tend to be assymetrical among races and species.
But it’s complicated
for example
what was the most evolved dinossaurs**
thyranossaurus rex**
compsognathus
what is the most evolved plant*
Based on phenotypical traits by now white europeans are the most evolved, on general, because *seems* their lack or absence of many primary/primate-like traits and yes, they have the least primate-looking.
But it is politically incorrect to say, 😉
And because most people can’t accept it without emotional histeria.
In the end what matter is
intelligence/wisdom
kindness
health
and
carpe diem
😉
Jay Gould***
”To say there are people more evolved is the opposite end of the spectrum of of denying human evolution.”
”Do you believe humans are more evolved than crocodiles?”
“A more evolved group can be less intelligent than a less evolved group, because how evolved you are is not measured by IQ, it’s measured by how much taxonomic change has occurred between each group and their common ancestor.”
So you admit that there is no way to quantify ‘genetically superior’ (whatever that means)? The fact that groups have a common ancestor proves the non-linearity of evolution.
“Do you believe humans are more evolved than crocodiles?”
Yes. But humans and crocodiles are two different taxa.
“Unfortunately.”
What’s wrong with it? I’m reading it right now and it’s great.
Santo,
“I thought groups need just select to the higher intelligence, don’t need increase their population size,”
Ashkenazi Jews are an anomaly, they gained their intelligence in…. 400 years if I remember what Cochran and Harpending said correctly.
“Inuit and other americo-mongolid groups don’t evolved to the higher intelligence just because they don’t select for, period.”
I have a theory that the Mesoamericans had a higher ceiling as they came into the Americas which is why they were able to build the civs they had but due to faster evolution in a hotter climate intelligence obviously decreased.
The point about Inuits is to show that a since they have the same brain size as East Asians (a group they share a common ancestor with) that a bigger population size is needed to select for higher intelligence.
“Based on phenotypical traits by now white europeans are the most evolved, on general, because *seems* their lack or absence of many primary/primate-like traits and yes, they have the least primate-looking.”
I get that. But it’s clear the primitive-like traits still persist in Africa due to the climate.
So you admit that there is no way to quantify ‘genetically superior’ (whatever that means)? The fact that groups have a common ancestor proves the non-linearity of evolution.
Genetically superior is hard to quantify, but more evolved is easy to roughly quantify, and more evolved correlates with superiority.
Yes. But humans and crocodiles are two different taxa.
Not sure what your point is. The important thing is you admit that two extant life forms can differ in their level of evolutionary development. So just apply the same logic to the much smaller differences within the human species.
”The point about Inuits is to show that a since they have the same brain size as East Asians (a group they share a common ancestor with) that a bigger population size is needed to select for higher intelligence.”
exactly
why**
Ashkenazi and other groups can be anomalies but in this case the exception don’t necessarily prove the rule.
In the environment, extreme cold, where inuit has lived complex higher intelligence seems a excess than a gift.
Intelligence or any other trait is selected or not via necessity, you know.
What i tried to say here is very simple
”select for intelligence don’t need any other motivation than select for intelligence”
then, greater population size or not is not absolutely important,
and if is easy to spray certain advantageous traits in little populations than in bigger, by obvious mathematical reasons, so this explanation seems, at least to me, insuficient to explain why, although the same brain size, amerids have scored lower than east asians.
Intelligence is not just bigger brains, even it is important too, we already know
so why this insistence about it*
Maybe brain size evolved first than their complexity among humans or maybe, just among east asians.
peepee’s lying about my WISC scores again.
made at age 9.
that’s all she does…LIE!
peepee has yet to produce a single IQ score report, let alone one from past age 12.
peepee’s IQ is OBVIOULSY low.
that’s why misdreavus, pincher martin, swank nasty, afro-sapiens have long since left.
poor peepee: low IQ, trandgendered, non-white, …
peepee’s lying about my WISC scores again.
I didn’t lie about anything, your IQ is just too low to keep up.
You said your best score on the WISC was vocab.
You’re too genetically stupid to understand having a BEST score means you obtained a maximum of one 19
Because 19 is the maximum score you moron
Anyone with more than one 19 doesn’t have a best score, they have mutiple best scores
You are dumb
How many ways do we have to say it?
Unfortunately my highest score was 18.
You’ve seen them before if you can guess who I am.
Well I was being generous when I said MugOfPee’s best score was 19. It might have been 19 or even 15…but the mere fact that he had a best score means he could not have made 19 (the maximum)on more than one subtest, else there would have been a tie for best score.
For example, black national merit finalist ruhkukah obtained TWO 19s on the Wechsler (information and Vocab) and thus did not have a best score.
And yes, we can guess who you are.
no alphabet
+
no fork
=
INFERIOR
It could be true that East Asians are genetically healthier. But in terms of their cognitive and behavioral aspects, they are less evolved.
Less genetic diversity may mean that the founder effect was more restrict. But this is not synonymous to “evolution” itself.
Then Jews are primitives??? They have higher proportion of harmful mutations, 😉
Jews are like a mixture of primitive semites and high functioning Meds.
Jews are very dynamic like Whites, hence their success in various fields. But they appear tribal or destructive, which makes their achievements negative, instead of positive.
Ashkenazi demography is like a whites in miniature.
If healthier were synonymous to more evolved then athletes would be more evolved than us
“scholar J.P. Rushton”
is that supposed to be a joke?
He is a scholar.
like dr phil.
Is Dr. Phil a specialist in his field? Or does he just write shitty diet books and have a shitty show?
Is J. P. Rushton a specialist in his field? Or does he just write shitty diet books and have a shitty show?
both Rushton AND Dr. Phil, MUCH smarter than you.
Yes he was a specialist in his field, no he didn’t write shitty diet books (he’s a great writer) and the times he’s been on TV he’s always held his cool and showed his extreme intellect.
They are nothing alike.
Whites has selected for a bunch of recessive traits.
Ab and b blood type are more common on central Asia. Two recent blood type mutations
Central Asians are more genetically evolved??
I’m still trying to understand what genetic distance really mean
Aboriginals have the highest genetic distant from Africans. Then they are more evolved than us??
Do we can create a pretty smart population with aboriginal traits?? Or physiognomy is absolutely right?
Ron Unz wrote about how China s high iq resulted from an unforgiving purely socially Darwinian society with high upward and downward social mobility and limited religious bs. I don’t see how diversity has much to do with iq but maybe an imperfect correlation at best.
Diversity also has different meanings because India has many more sexually isolated populations than Europe ever had but somehow Indians are less diverse.
What do “bad mutations” mean? If they accumulate in the unforgiving European ice age cold , how are they bad?
What was the life expectancy around the world before industrial era?? East Asians would live more? Africans still are in the first stage of demographic/socio economic transition and they have the lowest life expectancy, around 50’s years old. What is the life expectancy among reminiscent hunter gatherers communities??
that’s nice peepee.
I’m not PumpkinPerson.
He thinks we’re the same person
Autistics can’t tell the difference between sock puppets & different people
I’m Pumpkin Person
In your dreams 🙂
or in my nightmares, =(
so misdreavus was autistic too pp?
autistics are very bad liars pp.
Would be interesting analyse skin color/reflectance in the INTRA-racial perspective, i mean, analysing within euro-caucasoid and other populations.
We know that southern european elites appears to be more lighter than underclasses. How contrasting is this possible reality*
also analyse facial robustness and iq.
hey all.
i mean peepee.
peepee got a role in a canadian porno.
and she worked hard for it.
she’s gonna be a big star.
East asians tends to have bigger brains than western europeans and subsaharian africans AND they also tend to have lower stature, namely than northern europeans and bantus. Higher encephalization quotient*
Based on this perspective, ethiopians would be the most ”stupid”, lol
http://scitechdaily.com/bird-brains-have-significantly-more-neurons-than-primate-brains-of-the-same-mass/
Maybe the ”number of neurons” have a great role in intelligence differences than only brain size, or nut.
God who cares you fucking faggot…
ALL SPORTS ARE GAY…BUT SOME SPORTS ARE LESS GAY THAN OTHERS.
MAKING ANY EFFORT TO WIN AT SOME TOTALLY USELESS ACTIVITY IS SOMETHING STONE AGE MEN WOULD HAVE CONTEMNED…RIGHTLY!
THE LESS GAY SPORTS ARE THOSE WHICH REQUIRE THE LEAST EFFORT TO BE GOOD AT.
WHAT ARE THEY?
IDK.
CAPABLANCA IS THE GREATEST CHESS PLAYER EVER, AND HE MADE NO EFFORT…
BUT OTHER GREAT CHESS PLAYERS LIVED FOR CHESS…
SO WHAT ABOUT BRIDGE AND BACKGAMMON?
IDK.
A 2006 study stated that Capablanca was the most accurate of all the World Champions when compared with computer analysis of World Championship match games.[97][98] However, this analysis was criticized for using a second-rank chess program, Crafty, modified to limit its calculations to six moves by each side, and for favoring players whose style matched that of the program.[99] A 2011 computer analysis by Bratko and Guid using Rybka 2 and Rybka 3 found similar results to the 2006 Crafty analysis for Capablanca.
shut up
http://www.iflscience.com/brain/human-brains-structurally-same-non-human-primate-brains/
nothing peepee says can be taken seriously, because…
1. peepee is a girl.
2. peepee is not white.
3. peepee has a very low IQ and is autistic.
If my IQ is very low, what does that say about yours?
You’re the only person here who got only one (at the most) 19s on the wechsler.
i’m the only person here who isn’t you peepee-tard.
and you have yet to give any IQ score for yourself!
i’m still waiting…
i’m the only person here who isn’t you peepee-tard.
and you have yet to give any IQ score for yourself!
aim steal wading…
No, you’re the only person here who isn’t smart, though i can see how you’d confuse that with not being me.
I can’t take you seriously if you think that you and PP are the only ones who comment here.
more evidence that peepee is genetically inferior and “asian”.
she has still yet to provide an IQ score.
Peepee did release scores & they were higher than yours
You got the fewest 19s on the wechsler of anyone here
peepee is lying.
as usual.
st eel w8ing!
the “IQ scores” peepee thinks she “released”
WERE A TOTAL JOKE.
How were they a joke? I’ve shown far more proof of my scores than you have, including a photo of the original score report.
that was NOT a score report peepee-tard.
it was a dog license with dog crossed out and cat written in in crayon.
and even if it were, you were still a child.
saint
eel
w
8
ing!
Damn you’re stupid
That was the most authentic score report you’ll ever find.
You’re just jealous because everyone here with known Wechsler scores got MULTIPLE 19s, and you got ONE…at the most.
You said Vocab was your best score. The maximum scaled score is 19. Ergo, for vocab to be your best score, all other others scores must have been below 19.
You’re genetically inferior and you know it.
no transsexual (peepee is one) has an IQ above 100.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1005755/pg1
I thought this ”interesting” and also depressing
Kalergy must be happy in some place in the hell
the human of the future will be based on this
– mixed
– emotionally retarded
– depend on technology
the human of the future will be brazilian***
=(
thanks joos*
saint
eel
wading
Do an IQ analysis of Eminem. Blithe personality aside, he’s a lyrical genius.
He has a negro-like attitude. Most whites I see with a negro-like attitude are on the left side of the Curve. Tons of blacks are great with words due to high verbal IQ, but they’re idiots in mostly all other facets.
Eminem’s iq is reporting said to be around 140. And most highly successful rappers are usually at least above 105 (ex. Lil Wayne is 119)
Thanks for the info, source?
PP might say Eminem is a genius in the sense he adapted do his black environment. You could call him the Oprah of rap, as he has conquered a scene (most records ever sold by a rapper) that was/is historically dominated by his non-ethnos (blacks).
But people don’t ‘adapt’ to a black environment, they gravitate towards it due to a low IQ. White women who date/sleep with blacks? Low IQ. Whites who gravitate towards black culture? Low IQ.
If you are in a black environment and have no outs, it becomes an adapt or face physical repercussions (he was beat up a lot).
Also, perhaps adapt is not the right word…maybe mimic, which you do see in a lot of higher IQ blacks: Act blackish with da homeboys, like an oreo when with your fratty uni friends.
I just watched an interview of him w/ Anderson Cooper: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z42vDV2q6II
He doesn’t come off as too intelligent. Perhaps you are right >_<
I imagine higher IQ can change personas easily (dynamic) while lower IQ people kind of can only act in one way (static).
“Tons of blacks are great with words due to high verbal IQ, but they’re idiots in mostly all other facets.”
but isn´t verbal ability the most important? You need verbal ability almost in every situation. But what percentage of people e.g. need to solve mathematical equations in their every day life?
The most important is logical thinking skills. Verbal is absolutely complementary but is not the fundamental.
Just look to the fantasy-prone dogmatic groups: Leftists, religious people…
Blacks seems tends to have greater fluid verbal skills and lower crystallized verbal skills, comparative and absolutely speaking.
They tend to be essentially and minimally logical on their mode thinking, socially extrovered and good to talk, debate specially the brighter of them and even the not so brighter. This explain why Afrodescendents tend to appear verbally brighter but not showed in vocabulary, grammar skills., in verbal IQ.
Hormonal fever dragged long term sustainable behavior among many to most blacks. They have in their biology the environment where they has been adapted. So you have a high speed intrinsic way of life trying to adapt in the lowered intrinsic way of life, pre requisite to the “civilization” adaptation/conformation.
Civilization select for ants.
Eminen is intelligent he is the highest selling rap artist, he acts, he is good at comdey and apparently his true passion was comicbooks, i have heard his drawing skills are pretty decent. He has shiwn a complex mastery over multisyllabic and internal rhymes and his storytelling is very descriptive.
Yes, I’ve been meaning to do Eminem for over a year. You’re not the first person to suggest him.
I don’t listen to rap, but I’ve heard that Immortal Technique is super smart. Judge for yourself:
http://genius.com/Immortal-technique-dance-with-the-devil-lyrics
Immortal technique is imcredibly smart. I belive he has one of the top ten biggest vocabularies among rap artists. He is also quite wealthy from his music which is rare in the underground rap scene.
You dont listen to rap yet you know who immortal technique is? Hes not very known at all he is only famous on a underground level. You also linked to genius.com a well known rap forum
Melo — Yes, that is strange. Some of my college friends were listening to him once. I’ve only heard the “Dance with the Devil” song. This was seven years ago. I still remembered his name.
Another strange thing. My brother, who also isn’t a rap fan, sometimes listens to Death Grips, which is a crazy band.
“dance with the devil” is a great song and truly capitulates what storytelling is all about in relevance to rap. It makes since now, because that particular song is really famous, it’s almost on par with “stan”. I have heard of death grips but I haven’t actually listened to them.
PP, please estimate this rapper’s IQ:
Hipsters love Eminem and Immortal Technique. MF DOOM is also very popular with the hipster crowd.
clever sillies love it** wow
Actually people who DONT like eminem are hipsters. Eminem is liked by just about every white person around. He is really skilled but he is easily the most overrated rapper of alll time
Explain why ordinary white tend to be trash.
I’ve known hipsters who were into Eminem, but you are probably correct. Eminem is too popular to be a hipster-interest.
Hipsters also used to love Tyler, the Creator, although I’m not sure if they still do.
How does liking eminem make white people trash?
“Hipsters also used to love Tyler, the Creator, although I’m not sure if they still do.”
Really? i always thought tyler was more or less the “angsty skateboarder” crowd
Considering the correlation between IQ and musical talent, you might find it interesting that the “perfect pitch” talent is far more common among East Asians. Go figure.
I wonder if that is an artifact of their language being tonal, or because of that ability their language leaned tonal. Chikin and Egh story
Seems east Asians have less proportion of savant types specially the divergent thinkers but greater proportion of people with above average mental concentration skills : “oriental patience”.
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-06-upfront-personal-scientists-human-brain.html
Can you precisely explain what “genetically superior” mean ? Or may be it’s just a clickbait title ?
If East Asians are genetically superior, does it imply that Blacks are genetically inferior ?
Usually I don’t like the terms superior/inferior in terms of race because it depends on what context. Eurasians seem to be better at civilization building, but tropical people seem to do better in more primitive environments.
The problem about vague conception of superiority is that we are talking about populations who are in different space and time. And because there are multiple perspectives/ parameters to be compared. There are different ways to be “genetically superior”. Other problem is that we while individuals restricted in our respective space and time no have any conclusively long term power about the population or groups where we live. So culture work like that.
Santo-
You do understand how a Parliamentary system works, right?
The President has no choice but to appoint a PM (or in this case Chancellor) whose party manages to control the legislature. He had no choice but to appoint Merkel, who I assume is the reason for this post.
”Santo-
You do understand how a Parliamentary system works, right?”
no.
he have the choice…
Is the following graphic true? I find it incredibly depressing that as a whole, humanity is just not that smart:
Yes it is. The average for the world is 90.
Also see Templer’s and Arakawa 2006 for more information.
https://scontent-gru2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13906699_286859625039355_6047587862134337377_n.jpg?oh=8340b15cab3e8ae22cc6281153715adf&oe=5852D24D
With all due respect, pumpkinperson, wouldn’t it be better to say that Asians have a *niche*that relies more on brains than Caucasians and Blacks.
Which even, so is still debatable because the greatest “leaps” of human evolution (Ape to man) occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Black homeland.
*Which is still debatable*
With all due respect, pumpkinperson, wouldn’t it be better to say that Asians have a *niche*that relies more on brains than Caucasians and Blacks.
Which even, so is still debatable because the greatest “leaps” of human evolution (Ape to man) occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Black homeland.
Please post my comment.
Thanks.
*Which is still debatable*
Pumpkinperson is baiting Mugabe again.
“Trolling”
it’s hilarious!
Pumpkin,
If memory serves, you’ve said in the past that black conservatives should be the stupidest of blacks, because not only are they conservative (negatively correlated with intellect), but they vote against their genetic interests as well. Forgive me if this is an unfair representation of your views.
I disagree for two reasons. 1) a black person voting conservative rejects the herd mentality of that ethnic group to vote democrat, demonstrating the ability to think independently. 2) More importantly, liberal policies are not in fact in the genetic interest of the black community.
The liberal policies that you presume play to blacks advantage, such as welfare programs, do indeed work well in the short term. But over the long term they have crippled the black community. The best (or rather, worst) example is the aid to single mothers programs. Begun in the 50s and expanded in the 60s under LBJ, these programs systematically disincentivised marriage in the black community, which in turn led to greater rates of single motherhood. Kids raised without dads are far more likely to flunk out of school, get involved in crime, and bear fatherless kids themselves. Over the last 50 years, this has shattered the black community and is why, despite five decades of racial reconciliation, the black American is worse off today than he was at the end of Jim Crow.
It takes a sober mind to look past the short-term benefit of welfare aid and see the long-term disadvantages associated with dependency. Therefore, I’d wager that conservative blacks are some of the very smartest of their race.
I’d be obliged to hear your thoughts on the matter.
I have a very cynical theory on NE Asians and “HBD awareness”
It is apparent in many major cities in the U.S. Korean-Americans are the primary owners of liquor shops in the poorer- the Blacker areas of the city.
In the Rodney King riots in LA; 1992, Koreans were on the “front lines” protecting their shops which were in Black areas.
Why is that?
Koreans believe that Blacks have lower impulse control and “can’t help” but by booze and cigarettes. The elasticity of demand is very low and hence it is profitable for Koreans to sell Booze and Cigarettes in dangerous areas.
They know that they are “messing up” Blacks, but they sadly may be less inclined to care because they are so distantly genetically related.
They are also risking harm to themselves as we saw in the 1992 riots, but the profit potential > risk.
This is just my theory and you’re welcome to disagree.
Excellent theory
NE Asians are very distant from blacks both genetically & phenotypically so ethnic genetic interests heat up
Even though our very own Afrisapiens is extremely attractive & educated, tragically in Northeast Asia many females would find him horrific & men would kung fu him for daring to look at their daughters or sisters . Even obama was disrespected in NE Asia
It’s because to the rest of the world, Obama looks like a moron.
Ahah, I went on holiday in Bali and I drove the Japanese and Korean chicks crazy, and their men are physically inoffensive.
I drove the Japanese and Korean chicks crazy
Fantastic! 8 years of president obama has done wonders to minimize racism overseas
It was in 2010.
East Asian men are the definition of beta. Look at how a lot of Western men lust after East Asians.
John Derbyshire gets shit on by the AmRen commenters often for marrying an Asian.
“It was in 2010.”
“He only did it in two years!!”
“He only did it in two years!!”
And he hasn’t just had yellow chicks catching black fever, the funniest thing about traveling while black in Asia is that random people in the streets come and want to take pictures with you, the guide told us that they then showed the pictures to their friends saying they’ve seen a rapper or a soccer superstar.
Obama really did amazing things…
“Obama really did amazing things…”
Please, enlighten me.
That was in response to PP
More seriously, we can’t say he’s been worse than Dubya. From an European perspective, his health reform looks more than needed and the symbol he represented was a positive historical message. Then he’s just man, he ruled 4 years with the congress against him. He sucked in international politics (We Europeans resent that he didn’t care at all about Europe) and he couldn’t do a lot about the state of race relations, especially since the very fact that the president was black contributed to alienate a significant share of the white population.
Now that he’s off duty, I hope I’ll be able to meet him one day.
They aren’t subjected to the West’s political correctness.
Well if you’re bringing up politics it seems that Asians typically prefer that democratic candidates get elected, both internationally and domestically. For instance, more Asians voted Democrat in 2012 than Hispanics did (73% and 71%, respectively)
That is partially because they realize subsidies (welfare) is a lot of what enables these behaviors in ghetto Blacks, or rather, allows them to survive. Welfare is in these liquor store owners’ best interest.
It is also possible that they believe Republicans are racist against them, but that remains to be seen widespread.
Internationally, even in less “politically correct” cultures, Clinton was preferred to Hillary, even by supporters of say, Le Pen, because they realize Trump’s “nationalism” is not in THEIR best interests, only in Americans best interests.
Racial nationalism will probably never be strong in Europe, only ethnic nationalism.
Brexit was mainly a result of the varying Caucasian and European subrace squabbling amongst themselves.
*Clinton was preferred to Trump
In other words people will probably attack what is most genetically distant from them even if, in the big scheme of things, they are closely related to them.
I.E. Chollos bullying a lighter skinned Mexican in 99% Chollo East LA.
Rednecks bullying a White kid with curly Black hair in 97% White Appalachia.
Although it may seem silly to us, that’s the most genetically distant one would have to interact with daily.
Pingback: Chinese IQ, Immigrant Hyper-Selectivityand East Asian “Genetic Superiority” « NotPoliticallyCorrect