I’ve been a huge fan of this woman since she LOUDLY OPPOSED the Afghanistan War BEFORE IT BEGAN. Not only do I support her dovish foreign policy, but I agree with her support for unions. This may come as surprise for a free market capitalist, but if employers can organize and form a unified negotiating block (which is what a corporation is) logic dictates that workers can do the same. To suggest otherwise promotes supply/demand asymmetry which violates the free market.
And even though I believe the U.S. black-white IQ gap is at least 100% genetic, I support Marianne’s call for slavery reparations. Being smarter than another race does not give you the moral right to enslave them, and if Germans gave reparations to Jews over the Holocaust, why shouldn’t America give reparations to the descendants of American slaves? However one could argue that reparations have largely already been paid in the form of affirmative action and other social programs, so we would need a team of economists to do the math. However I believe that even if white Americans gave 100% of their wealth to black Americans, within a few generations, whites would once again be richer because HBD.
I strongly disagree with Marianne on a wealth tax for people worth over $50 million, not because I think the rich deserve all the money they have, but rather because once you own something, you should not have to pay taxes on it. This also applies to property tax which I also oppose.
The way to get the rich to pay their fair share is to tax capital gains and inherited wealth the same way you tax earned income and to strengthen unions so that corporations can’t get so rich in the first place.
Pumpkin Person 
when do you think the world ends? either completely or in a majority! societal collapse is inevitable but nuclear warfare might happen much sooner 2.
peepee is bringing down the average IQ of canada. sad. she needs to be sent back to somalia or whatever muslim black shithole country she comes from.
P = hG + sqrt(1 – h^2)E
suppose E(P1) = E(P2) – 1 SD
E(P1) = 0, by construction
E(P2) = -1 SD = h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1)
E(P1) – E(P2) = h*E(G1)
what does it mean to speak of the heritability of the difference? it means nothing. the question is what % of the difference is due to the difference between G1 and G2. so you’d have to divide by h*E(G1). only if E1 > 0 = E2 can this % be greater than 100%. but as everyone who isn’t incredibly bad at math knows E1 < 0.
The world will begin to end beginning 2027. A global super-pandemic far deadlier than covid will arise (from virii from melting permafrost to which we may not have a cure even in 2027) and wipe out 90% of the human population in 3-5 years.
With a.i and lab grown meat and artificial agriculture ( unconventional agriculture https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/06/23/artificial-photosynthesis-can-produce-food-without-sunshine )
advancing i dont see how 8-9 billion people will sustain in terms of jobs. There will be enough food, water, clothing and shelter to provide for even 10 billion people but not enough jobs for even 8 billion….in a few years.
1. nothing can be more than 100% genetic.
2. all the slaves are dead. germany has never paid anything to the descendants of holocaust survivors.
3. at this point i realized peepee was a mentally retarded negress for the bajillionth time, so i stopped reading. the retardation is just too much.
OMG you’re so dumb
If genotype gap exceeds phenotype gap the gap exceeds 100% genetic
Holocaust survivors were so old it was defacto given to descendants
OMG you’re so incredibly bad at math and a LIAR.
1. the only way the genotype gap could exceed the phenotype gap is if blacks have a BETTER environment than whites. you’d have to be a mentally retarded negress to believe that.
2. germany started paying reparation sin 1953. it wasn’t given to descendants and it still isn’t.
apologize immediately and admit you’re black and mentally retarded.
yet another example of peepee’s low IQ…two in such a short time. sad.
1. the only way the genotype gap could exceed the phenotype gap is if blacks have a BETTER environment than whites.
FALSE! Blacks would only need a better environment than whites of the same IQ genotype which is possible given affirmative action.
I am sorry Mug of Pee but you are not too bright.
2. germany started paying reparation sin 1953. it wasn’t given to descendants and it still isn’t.
IDIOT!
From 1945 to 2018, the German government paid approximately $86.8 billion in restitution and compensation to Holocaust victims and their heirs. Germany has also identified Nazi-looted objects – including art works, books, and objects within larger collections – and has returned 16,000 objects to survivors and their heirs over the last 20 years.
https://www.state.gov/reports/just-act-report-to-congress/germany/
human extinction will happen. it always does. Nietzsches eternal recurrence.
Why—after all of these years—do you still believe that it’s fruitful to think that G and E are separable into quantities when it’s been argued for decades that it’s simply impossible to do so?
Because it is possible. It’s called analysis of the variance. If you equalized the environment (for many kinds of environments) and the black-white gap disappeared or even reversed, that would prove it’s 0% genetic or even negative percent genetic. But if it completely remained or increased, that would prove it’s at least 100% genetic.
This is the simplest of logic.
Nope: analysis of causes > analysis of variance. Lewontin showed this 50 years ago. And there is the fact of the matter of Bart-Gunn’s (1996) results which showed after adjusting for social and economic differences between blacks and whites that IQ differences were basically eliminated, which is telling for the argument I’ve been mounting for years regarding social class differences in knowledge.
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/35/3/520/735787
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/35/3/525/735798
And there is the fact of the matter of Bart-Gunn’s (1996) results which showed after adjusting for social and economic differences between blacks and whites that IQ differences were basically eliminated,
RR, you can’t on the one hand argue G and E can’t be separated into different quantities and then endorse a study that did exactly that, just because it fits your bias. That’s completely hypocritical.
They didn’t compute h2 though. They showed the same 1 SD gap and then after adjusting for economic position, poverty, maternal education and learning experiences all but eliminated the gap. This result was also replicated.
In any case, that’s irrelevant to the claim that analysis of causes are much more preferably to analysis of variance.
They didn’t compute h2 though. They showed the same 1 SD gap and then after adjusting for economic position, poverty, maternal education and learning experiences all but eliminated the gap.
But their basic logic was:
genetic gap + environmental gap = phenotypic gap
By adjusting for poverty & other social conditions, they were arguing that if environmental gap = 0, then phenotypic gap = 0 and since the phenotypic gap = genetic gap + environment gap, solving the equation gives a genetic gap of 0.
I don’t agree with their conclusion but their logic is sound.
In any case, that’s irrelevant to the claim that analysis of causes are much more preferably to analysis of variance.
Well we already know that the only the only possible causes of the black-white IQ gap are genes and environment
“after adjusting for economic position, poverty, maternal education and learning experiences all but eliminated the gap. ”
“controlling for clothing size, height, body composition, maternal calorie consumption…Samoans are no heavier than Japanese! Wow, if we just give Samoans smaller clothes and stuff they will get skinny too!”
Pumpkin, blacks have AA but 85 IQ whites generally have the advantage of growing up with medium IQ white people. Some say city living is an IQ advantage.
Some guy is being sarcastic puppy.
No he’s not. You overrate your social intuition.
I feel like you two are probably talking about different parts of my comment.
Some guy, you are so right as usual!
I didn’t even read the sarcastic part of your comment because it was in quotes so I assumed you were quoting me and thus didn’t need to read myself. I thought pill was saying you were sarcastically claiming whites have better environments than blacks.
LOL wow. Thats serious autism.
It is some serious autism. What do you think it means that after those variables are controlled for that differences all but vanish?
“Well we already know that the only the only possible causes of the black-white IQ gap are genes and environment”
So why analyze variance and not causes? That’s basically the castle of sand that the whole hereditarian programme since Jensen in 1969 is based on. It’s based on a huge misunderstanding of heritability. Like Murray said, “60 percent of the intelligence comes from heredity” and that that heritability is “not 60 percent of the variation. It is 60 percent of the IQ in any given person” (quoted in Block, 1995).
Cause is very hard to analyze unless you can do an experiment. But one such experiment was the Minnesota transracial adoption study and it proved environment has virtually no effect on the black-white IQ gap.
Heritability assumes that G and E are (1) separable, (2) quantifiable, and (3) independent of each other. That model is laughably wrong.
So how do you explain the fact that when we put people with the same genes in different environments (MZ twins raised apart), their IQs correlate strongly but when we put people with different genes in the same environment (unrelated kids adopted by the same person), their IQs don’t correlate at all (by adulthood)?
>Minnesota transracial adoption study
the p hacking was extreme on that pp
IMO because the sample sizes were so low.
No it was the critics who did the p hacking
but the sample was still too low:
they did not have a constant variable of a control group large enough to be statistically significant.
(sample 2000 kid white adapted)
vs
(sample 2000 kids white non-adapted)
and
(sample 2000 kids black adapted)
vs
(sample 2000 kids black non-adapted)
“Heritability assumes that G and E are (1) separable, (2) quantifiable, and (3) independent of each other. That model is laughably wrong.”
What do you mean by “separable?” As far as I know, heritability estimates attempt to equalize environmental (or genetic) variation. I don’t think that’s the same as suggesting traits express themselves in a vacuum.
Since there is no privileged level of causation, wouldn’t a causal analysis be pointless?
“So how do you explain the fact that when we put people with the same genes in different environments (MZ twins raised apart), their IQs correlate strongly but when we put people with different genes in the same environment (unrelated kids adopted by the same person), their IQs don’t correlate at all (by adulthood)?”
Because he’s a blank slatist. He’ll hide behind “mind-brain” dualism and epigenetics and IQ test problems and developmental systems theory and holisticism and selective immigration and two studies written by a Leibowitzstein et al with a sample size of 15 that have never been replicated as long as it can be used to support blank slatism. Instead of just admitting that genetics matter, even if all those things show how complicated intelligence and development is.
“But one such experiment was the Minnesota transracial adoption study and it proved environment has virtually no effect on the black-white IQ gap.”
Yea Drew Thomas already addressed the attrition in the MISTRA and dissected Rushton and Jensen’s claims about Asian adoption studies, explained by the Flynn effect and adoption’s beneficial effect on IQ (which is undeniable now, see eg the earliest from Skeels and Skodak, 1949).
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1
“So how do you explain the fact that when we put people with the same genes in different environments (MZ twins raised apart), their IQs correlate strongly but when we put people with different genes in the same environment (unrelated kids adopted by the same person), their IQs don’t correlate at all (by adulthood)?”
Do you have a reference?
“No it was the critics who did the p hacking”
Who? Evidence?
“What do you think it means that after those variables are controlled for that differences all but vanish?”
It means that if you control for lots of things correlated with X you’re practically controlling for X. If you control for volume and density everything has the same mass, amazing. You can control for any two of those attributes and the third becomes meaningless.
It’s similar with your example, if you controlled for any 4 of the 5 attributes you mentioned they would probably explain most of the variation in the fifth attribute. That’s just what happens when you have a network of highly correlated attributes.
“after adjusting for economic position, poverty, maternal education and learning experiences all but eliminated the gap [in IQ]”
“It means that if you control for lots of things correlated with X you’re practically controlling for X.”
No, it doesn’t mean that at all. I take it to mean that those variables are what influences test scores what is the X that you think is “practically controlled for” in this instance?
IQ.
If you have four things that correlate say 0.4 with IQ, how highly do you think all of them combined correlates with IQ? 0.7? 0.8? If you control for 0.8 of IQ it’s not strange for a gap to shrink a lot.
This doesn’t tell us anything about what causes what, since you could just as easily do the reverse and say that controlling for IQ, poverty etc nearly eliminates the gap in economic position.
What are you talking about? Social and economic differences account for test scores in virtue of the item content that’s on the test. You’re not “practically controlling” for IQ when controlling those variables. That’s absurd.
Ceci’s study where he showed that when IQ is equated and social class is not showed that family background and social class, not IQ, explains the IQ-income relationship. Do you have an issue with that finding too?
So by adjusting for poverty and home environment, since that shows the gap all but closed, then this means that there is support for the argument I’ve been using for years on the causes of the test score gap between blacks and whites.
I don’t want to get into the weeds of every study, maybe Pumpkin already has. If you’re right I’m sure environmental interventions will fix the gap any day now.
https://reasonwithoutrestraint.com/the-causal-influence-of-cognitive-ability/
E(P1) – E(P2) = h*E(G1)…if blacks and whites have the same distribution of environments
and…
E(P1) – E(P2) = h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1) if they don’t.
(h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1))/(h*E(G1)) =
1 + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1)/(h*E(G1))
this can only be > 1 if E1 > 0 which then would also be > E2 by construction.
1 = black 2 = white
mugabe: but E(G1) 1 only if E1 > E2 = 0…which is not reality.
% environment = 1 – % genetic
but then you could have a % genetic 0.
P( I | E (G)) = 100%
What does the I and E(G) mean here?
mugabe: but E(G1) less than 0! you moron!
so what do you do about that?
anyway if the difference is greater than expected from genes alone then the difference is less than 100% genetic not greater than 100% genetic. that’s what people mean. maybe peepee just can’t speak english.
so the correct formula is:
% genetic = h*E(G1)/(h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1))…this will be > 1 only if E1 > E2 = 0…which is not reality.
% environment = 1 – % genetic
but then you could have a % genetic 0.
mugabe: but E(G1) less than 0! you moron!
so what do you do about that?
anyway if the difference is greater than expected from genes alone then the difference is less than 100% genetic not greater than 100% genetic. that’s what people mean. maybe peepee just can’t speak english.
so the correct formula is:
% genetic = h*E(G1)/(h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1))…this will be > 1 only if E1 > E2 = 0…which is not reality.
% environment = 1 – % genetic
but then you could have a % genetic less than 0 if E was so large that the less innately “smart” population actually scored higher, that is if h*E(G1) + sqrt(1 – h^2)*E(E1) > 0.
You’re overly complicating things as all low IQ people do.
If equalizing environment reduces the IQ gap, it’s less than 100% genetic. If it increases it, it’s more than 100%.
Mug of Pee has a degree in math and knows all about heritability, but the emperor has no clothes.
When confronted with a novel problem, all his education becomes useless and he resembles a dog chasing its own tail.
That’s because no amount of crysalized knowledge can substitute for fluid g.
Watching Mug of Pee do math reminds me of the scene in the WIZARD OF OZ where the Wizard is exposed as a tiny little man.
if instead of this:
And even though I believe the U.S. black-white IQ gap is at least 100% genetic…
this is impossible unless every black was adopted at birth by jews.
peepee had written:
And even though I believe the U.S. black-white IQ gap is not less than that predicted by genes alone…
then this would be true and the extent to which the gap exceeded that predicted by genes alone would be calculated with the first formula i gave.
BUT that’s not what she said…or meant to say.
his is impossible unless every black was adopted at birth by jews
First you said it was impossible for anything to be more than 100% genetic. Now that you were proven wrong you shift the goal posts by saying impossible unless raised by Jews. Also wrong. Their average environment need only exceed the environment of the average IQ 85 white American; it need not exceed the average environment of all U.S. whites.
Puppy is generally right. I think Mugabe places too much faith in the environment as some sort of panacea. Even if blacks were put into some eugenics program where they were raised by upper class jewish women, I don’t think their IQs would rise by more than another 5 points, max, dependant on how much white genes they had.
Rather than think of these really weird and contrived scenarios where blacks have lab condition perfect environments we simply need to just recognise that at this point in American history genes are more important for explaining the IQ gap.
What does it mean for the IQ gap to be predicted by genes?
Shutup RR. Go back to fucking Berkely. They love that stupid shit over there.
so it begins? the coup attempt was staged in order to start the purge? the original purge in the 30s was occasioned by the assassination of kirov, but most historians believe stalin had nothing to do with this assassination.
melo suggested this but only in the narrow sense of people who actually were disloyal might be revealed. but the great purge went way beyond that. almost all of its victims were innocent of what they were accused of.
once a chekist always a chekist. — putin
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-general-surovikin-arrested-wagner-203234652.html
Its basically ridiculous to speculate about russian politics. We know even less of russian internal parlour games than american ones. No matter what the IQ level, theres too little info to go on.
I hate being right all of the time about everything.
Philo is right, though. I gave up speculating because I’ll never know until 40 years from now when Russia is gone and pillaged.
”I strongly disagree with Marianne on a wealth tax for people worth over $50 million, not because I think the rich deserve all the money they have, but rather because once you own something, you should not have to pay taxes on it. This also applies to property tax which I also oppose.
The way to get the rich to pay their fair share is to tax capital gains and inherited wealth the same way you tax earned income and to strengthen unions so that corporations can’t get so rich in the first place.”
You disagree because you are a millionaire i strongly feel. When someone pays taxes on the income they earned, there is nothing wrong with paying tax on stuff they own.
C’mon peeps, I thought you were different to other people….
Puppy is…certain ways of thinking. He thinks taxing property is somehow ‘illegitimate’ even though that is basically the number 1 one most efficient way of taxing someone. Every economist in the modern day no matter what political party will agree taxing work discourages people from working. Taxing capital gains discourages people from investing. And so on.
Taxing property does not discourage people from attaining property. Therefore it is by far the most efficient and most lucrative way for the government to collect taxes. Its also the fairest way.
People have literally researched this question for centuries. Even the neoliberals who taught me economics in college agreed that taxing property is better than taxing income or even trading/gambling.
I guess this answers my question about what Pumpkin thought about a Land-value tax.
Marianna Williamson is the standout contender for the president this cycle. I said it 2 months ago if you read my comments. I was very impressed with her charisma and ability to argue.
Look, shes a jew which is seriously dont like but her policy prescriptions are basically exactly what I would do on economics and campaign finance.
Its very very ironic that the people at the top of the system like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers have the same background as challengers to the system like Bernie and Marianne. I find this really bizarre. Marxist analysis suggests that they should have the same goals and same beliefs. HBD suggests that they should literally be telling the same lies and suggest the US is controlling Israel crap.
Look, we have a raw deal here and the best solution is either jew Williamson on the left or mentally insane Kanye on the right.
Its very very ironic that the people at the top of the system like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers have the same background as challengers to the system like Bernie and Marianne. I find this really bizarre. Marxist analysis suggests that they should have the same goals and same beliefs.
Actually it makes perfect sense. The same intelligence that allows them to dominate society also allows the moral ones to question the ethics of doing so.
It’s analogous to how humans dominate and exploit other animals, yet we’re also the animal that saves animals and defends their basic rights, the only animal to think it’s wrong to kill and steal.
It’s analogous to how whites colonized and enslaved other races, yet whites also led the movement to abolish slavery.
The same intelligence allows both.
So even though intelligence evolved to serve primal Darwinian interests, it also gives us the abstract moral reasoning to break free of them.
This is why liberals have higher IQs when you control for ethnicity
Generally speaking higher intelligence has been a total disaster for all other species on earth including of course the earth itself.
Maybe unbeknownst to the challengers, their presence in the opposition takes away space from those who can actually change the system in a direction that the system doesn’t like. The challengers think that they are challenging a system that they perceive but in action it doesn’t have much of an impact. Like an organelle working in a cell without knowing it. Maybe, but not a certainty, just maybe.
Can you stop being a douche and post my comments!
Some of your comments are just too vulgar, crude and pointless to post. Try writing stuff that other people would actually want to read.
Thats not how truth is spread lmfao wtf
” I find this really bizarre”
We know you do, Philly. That’s why it’s evident you can’t handle nuance well.
Puppy told me in private conversations that calling black women ugly is ‘racist’. Telling the truth is ‘racist’. Whats more important? The truth or not being a ‘racist’.
The answer is the truth. All the data from dating sites shows black women are the least desired demographic. Even worse than asian men.
https://newsone.com/1247075/black-women-ugly-pyschology-today-satoshi-kanazawa/
The east asian psychologist kanazawa said it better than I could with statistical FACTS.
But I guess he is a ‘racist’ and therefore evil for telling the truth.
“All the data from dating sites shows black women are the least desired demographic. Even worse than asian men.”
I disagree with those data. I would date a black woman over an Asian man any day. But hopefully those are not the only choices.
This stuff about reperations….Its fucking retarded Puppy and makes me think not just that you have a super low social IQ but that your general reasoning and intelligence is RR level.
Only a total fucking idiot would even entertain the idea of reperations for slave descendants.
What are you going to do puppy? Are you going to get a cleaver and chop off 20% of black peoples bodies and give the torso the rest the money? Sometimes I read your comments and just wonder how someone can do complex math and have such pathetically low reasoning ability. Jesus christ. Even Anime wouldn’t suggest this.
Marianne was basically saying this because she’s a politician. If she was actually president she’d do what Biden did and get a committee to study the issue and conclude its ridiculous and bury the issue.
About 10% of the population believes in reperations, including blacks. Youre fucking retarded.
Actually I changed my mind about U.S. reparations last night because I remembered a commenter here made the argument that the descendants of slaves are much richer than their counterparts in Africa so you can’t really show slavery caused damages to them. However descendants of African slaves that were shipped to poor countries like India do deserve reparations from the Arabs/Indians who enslaved them.
If that’s all it took for you to so quickly change your mind, then you didn’t believe that in the first place. It’s irrelevant that they are richer than those who weren’t enslaved. They were enslaved for years and so we’re deprived of money, since they worked for free. It’s on the order of trillions of dollars that weren’t paid.
They were enslaved for years and so we’re deprived of money, since they worked for free. It’s on the order of trillions of dollars that weren’t paid.
I agree but by being moved to a country with a much higher standard of living, their descendants ended up enjoying trillions of dollars in benefits they would not have had in Africa. That’s a huge mitigating factor.
So the logic here is although they weren’t paid for their work for hundreds of years and were presumably denied trillions of dollars and the opportunity to build wealth for their descendants, the ACT ITSELF of enslaving people (which is morally wrong) led to them being richer than their descendants (a truism) means the reparations shouldn’t be paid? I don’t think that makes sense.
The two of you are total clowns making clown world arguments. Its like hearing two religious people debate whether St Paul or St Mark was more holier or had more superpowers. So ridiculous.
Slavery lead to a loss of sovereignty which is bad, but it didn’t damage them materially as a whole. Then again, the slaves that were bought could have had limited sovereignty in Africa since they were captured as slaves by other blacks but the slave trade just increased incentives for blacks capturing each other as slaves. So the way I see it, the sovereignty point is the only one of the 2 that holds true, and is monetarily incalculable so reparations aren’t applicable in the form of material wealth. Maybe an independent nation could have been carved out of America post-civil war for that.
Peeps this article is about west afrcians and it is mostly east afrcians that went to india and not all of them that went there were slaves. Also it was mostly british and islamic rulers in india (some of whom could be foreigners/part-foreigners in india like mughals and deccan sultans) who had them as slaves.
I was talking about blacks in general, not east vs west.
Why are you pulling numbers out of your ass?
“When it comes to reparations for black Americans, 77 percent of blacks agreed that descendants of enslaved people should receive reparations, while only 18 percent of whites agreed. About 3 in 10 US adults think that some form of reparations should be given to descendants of slavery, while about 68 percent believe that slavery descendants should not be paid, per Pew.”
If any politician openly endorsed reparations for blacks in a majority non-black district they would end their political career. Pew has a lot of weird survey results that frankly, I think are gamed. It said that 65% of americans support open borders when that is technically impossible. We know Trump became US president running on immigration as the number 1 issue so basically if you believe that rigged fake ass Berkely poll then Trump is totally unviable in the US.
Obviously you have a very low social and intellectual IQ so you aren’t able to think critically about bogus ‘studies’ and surverys.
Point me to a better poll or shut up.
OK, I’m going to say it without doing the research. The jews control Pew.
The jews control Pew.
Oh go to hell! The Jews did not rig the poll you idiot.
You didn’t need to say that, we all assume you believe that when it comes to everything.
Theres no other logical explanation for why a polling company would do a bogus and frankly, ridiculous poll on such a political issue. Its not even believable to Anime that 65% of the population want open borders or that 30% of americans want reperations. Only a total fucking idiot thinks these polls are legit.
Its run by jews. Just like the rest of the media. Theyre very smart. They control all the angles. Very ‘clever’ as Bruno would say.
That’s not how polling bias works. For 75 years Gallup did a poll asking who the most admired man in America was. Then in 2020 Donald Trump won. Did they rig the poll to rob Trump of the win? No. They just never did the poll again to prevent him from getting another win. A 75 year tradition trashed because it no longer served their agenda. That’s how media bias actually works. They don’t typically lie per se, they just selectively report or frame the debate in a biased way. Even tucker Carlson agrees with me on this.
No they also rig the polls. Trump even said it. The polls before the 2016 election showed Hilary easily beating Trump for example. FAKE NEWS!
I’m sorry puppy but your colleagues in the industry at this point in time are told by jews to run fake numbers. They’re called ‘suppression polls’. Google the term.
And Hillary DID beat Trump in the POPULAR vote, so polls reflecting Americans as a whole, were correct. But U.S. elections are decided by the electoral college, not the popular vote.
Look puppy. Its called social intelligence. They dont just rig the polls by the way. They rig official statistics about the economy, jobs, defense spending etc. I also think they rig it about attitudes to interracial marriage. I’d say 1/10 whites, maybe less would be happy if their child married a black. I bet Pew says 80% would be delighted.
And if you think americans are doing well like the statistics keep saying for 30 years….then youre a fucking gullible idiot too.
Other countries do it too. Frankly, anything from China polling or stats…basically its not much better than asking someone at the bus stop their opinion. Anything in the middle east is not even believed by the actual government workers.
Whatever dude. All you do is make crap up that can’t be verified, & if people don’t agree you say they’re socially unintelligent.
That’s like me claiming that purple dinosaurs lived on Neptune a million years ago, and if you don’t agree you’re scientifically illiterate.
I guess all the politicians who collectively spend billions on polling are all too socially dumb to know Jews just fabricate the data and don’t actually survey the public.
No the politicians get access to the real polling. Robert Rubin gets access to the real polling. They call it ‘internal polling’. Basically they can’t trust the official polling because its jewish.
And none of this fraudulent polling has ever leaked to the media, not even to alternative media like youtube. Not one single whistle blower has ever come forward ever?
You’re an idiot.
Fuck off.
Look I don’t want to keep bashing your…deficiencies…but you admitted you watch CNN. You supported reparations up until an hour ago when I made you realise how ridiculous it is. You think Bill Gates would win in a state of nature vs Devon Misdreaveaus. I mean I could go on and on about your certain deficiencies.
So its no surpise you back fraudulent polling and think its great ‘science’.
I remember when i used to bother debating RR and gypsyman instead of reading their dumbass studies I would literally just google the authors to see if they were jewish. Within 30 minutes I realised these jews were using circular references to each others papers. Thats called social intelligence Puppy.
Within 30 minutes I realised these jews were using circular references to each others papers. Thats called social intelligence Puppy.
No that’s called antisemitism.
I understand Jewish influence better than anyone, but dismissing any study that has a Jewish author is just psychotic.
Haha you know that applies to the Rushton/Lynn/Jensen/Templer/Kanazawa cabal, right? Like Lynn, where he referred to a “consensus” on cold winter theory going back to… Kanazawa, Templer and Arikawa, and Rushton.
“I used to read and then I learned the ethnicity of the authors and simply ignored the arguments.” Great logic there.
“Antisemitism” or being aware of the behaviours of high IQ gypsy people is the HALLMARK of advanced social intelligence. It literally takes people years to overcome brainwashing to be an “antisemite” or based on these people.
“You didn’t need to say that, we all assume you believe that when it comes to everything.”
LMAO, bruh, I’m fucking dead.
Why would Gallup even rig their polls? It’s not like that would change reality. Does it even cross his mind that perhaps sampling bias or some other statistical factor is causing the inaccuracy or inconsistency of the polls?
No. Because he’s fucking retarded.
Why do you ‘hate’ people and ‘hate taxes on property’ but are for giving transfers to blacks? Are you brainwashed like Bill Gates?
So you basically hate poor white people only.
So are you going to answer why you want to transfer wealth to blacks but not whites even though you are a ‘free market capitalist’ Bill?
Loaded is intellectually out of his depth on this blog. Definitely RR. And probably Melo.
Likewise Anime and Ganzir for autism.
The problem is that we don’t have tests to measure social IQ and create a composite score of intelligence.
What the hell did Ganzir ever do wrong? Yes he said he considers himself autistic and some weird taste in cartoon characters, but he also made a ton of intelligent comments.
He said that he didn’t know a man and a woman have sex when they are boyfriend and girlfriend.
youre quite seriously the most idiotic person ive ever met irl or online.
What’s the argument that the “black-white IQ gap is at least 100% genetic”? Why do you need the “at least” qualifier while making that claim?
Someone should bundle RR into the back of a van and bring him to Russia for an intense de-programming session. Thats what they do to escaped North Koreans. Literally 1 year of de-programming and telling them 2+2=4. Psychologically very dangerous if you dont do it properly.
You look at the stupid shit Melo says. He said the other day that this mercenary leader was pissed off with the generals as part of a ‘psyop’. Do you even know what a ‘psyop’ is?
You are willing to believe in that…but if you googled the studio heads, publishers and media executives and did basic wikipedia research you would realise within 1 day that the media is totally jew controlled.
Its called intelligence. Some people have it. Some people don’t.
“He said the other day that this mercenary leader was pissed off with the generals as part of a ‘psyop’. ”
Jesus Christ, you don’t even know what I believe. I said the mutiny/coup/whatever was possibly a psyop to lure out traitors within the Kremlin. Is it true? Who fucking knows! But it makes a hell of a lot more sense than your Jewspiracy bullshit.
Chris Langan would literally burst out laughing if you suggested he pay reperations to Devon Misdreaveus from da hood.
RR should be put down in kennel. I’m sorry. But thats how annoying he is.
Anyone notice Madonna looks like something out of a horror movie. Wow.
for example:
if Gnegro = -1 and Enegro = 0 then the difference is 100% genetic but less than 15 points unless h^2 = 100%.
if Gnegro = -1.41 and Enegro = 0 and h^2 = 0.5 then the difference is still 100% genetic but is now -1 SD.
if Gnegro = -1 and Enegro = -1 and h^2 = 0.5 then the difference is -1 SD but only 50% genetic.
cue peepee not unnuhstannin and throwing a fit in the macdonald’s because racism and microaggressions.
Oh I see what you’re doing.
You’re defining the percentage that’s genetic as:
independent genetic effect/ (independent genetic effect + independent environment effect)
So since the numerator is also part of the denominator, it can never be more than 100% of the denominator.
I was defining “percentage of the gap that’s genetic” as how big the gap would be if the races had the same environment so under my definition the genetic component could exceed 100% but I must admit, your way of defining it makes more sense.
Who cares?
People who aren’t the constant edge of a mental breakdown who can sit down and concentrate on a problem that isn’t immediate for a few minutes?
see!
peepee thinks i’ll have sex with her now even though she’s still getting it wrong because can’t speak english and incredibly bad at math.
no! you weren’t defining it in any way! i was TRYING to define it in a way that made your nonsensical claim make sense.
BUT it still is the EXACT opposite of what you meant!
I was defining “percentage of the gap that’s genetic” as how big the gap would be if the races had the same environment
WHICH WOULD ALWAYS BE 100% GENETIC!
DRRR!
DRRR!
DRRR!
try steelmanning and principle of charity for ESL student peepee…
I was defining “percentage of the gap that’s genetic” as how big the gap would be if the races had the same environment DIVIDED INTO THE ACTUAL GAP???
???
???
USE GOOGLE TRANSLATE FROM NOW ON PEEPEE!
WHICH WOULD ALWAYS BE 100% GENETIC!
My definition of “percent of the gap that is genetic” was simply the genotypic gap/phenotypic gap.
Your definition is genotypic gap / geneotypic gap + environmental gap
My definition allows for the gap to be more than 100% genetic while yours does not.
However I now think your definition is the correct one.
Now you might say these two formulas are the same since phenotypic gap = genetic gap + environmental gap
So the real distinction is the unit of measurement. We were both using Z scores but you were treating it more analogous to a physical scale.
And of course on a physical scale phenotypic gaps will always be bigger than their genetic component, but on a Z scale, not necessarily.
“My definition allows for the gap to be more than 100% genetic while yours does not.”
Doesn’t it, if the environmental gap is negative?
1 / (1 + (-0.1)) = 1.11
Puppy is Chris Langan a racist?
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/women-seeking-jobs-in-bill-gates-private-office-were-asked-sexually-explicit-questions-report-claims/ar-AA1ddqat?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=bad5bfa2443d413f972bfe509db6046e&ei=21
JESUS CHRIST.
This Bill Gates guy is a total pervert. Look at the questions he asked women in job interviews puppy.
Also the article states Epstein blackmailed bill gates over an affair he had with a russian.
I think bill gates is being targeted for some reason. Sure they say there is no smoke without fire and so bill may be guilty of some stuff they accuse him of but some additional stuff has been added to malign him i think. It is not like supermodels go to work at microsoft. And bill can easily have some of the best supermodels for himself with his money. Why hit on his employees?
Why do you take so long to moderate comments?
Because PP needs to take a lot of time out of his day to hit on genetically superior Asian women and watch old episodes of Oprah. Then he needs to take two hours to watch another horror movie. How about you LOADED?
Lol.
The time has come to end my tenure on this blog, until the end of the 2024 presidential cycle. This is my penultimate message. I will not be complicit in the propagation of rank cretinism. In addition to being the worst presidential candidate in American history, Marianne Williamson is the worst ashkenazim demagogue in human history. African American reparations are the most execrable policy in human history. They will open the floodgates to the deluge of third world subsaharan Africa reparations in a braying self mutilating expiatory ecstasy of the imbecilic holocaustianity adherents and the extirpation of the caucasoid phenotype, and by extension the human species, since the panegyrized thaumaturgic negroid martyrs do not have the capacity for the sustenance of an industrial civilization.
…the panegyrized thaumaturgic negroid martyrs do not have the capacity for the sustenance of an industrial civilization.
^^^my hero^^^
serbia must rule the world!
Society will collapse before the end of the year if the trajectory stays linear.
Pumpkin my bad 4 insulting you but if you want intellectuality 2 prevail then we must sacrifice views 4 truth! Only way things will change and intellect will flourish!