So I’ve been watching youtubers interview Steve Hsu. The first interview I saw was done by some Israeli, the second one I watched was by a guy of South Asian descent, and the third was some white guy who seemed to think he was Buddha.
Steve made a lot of important points, some of which I’ve discussed before.
When Steve first entered this field he feared that traits like height and IQ would be too non-additive to decode and too pleiotropic to edit. Pleiotropy is when a genomic variant affects more than one seemingly unrelated phenotype, for example one theory is that high IQ kids wear glasses because the genes for IQ also cause myopia.
Luckily, genetic architecture is overwhelmingly additive and with over 3 billion base-pairs in the genome, pleiotropy is not that bad.
The additive nature of the genome has been long understood by animal breeders and was formally explained in the famous Fisher Theorem in the 1930s. Put simply, phenotypes that are caused by additive genes are favored by natural selection because they’re easier to pass on. That’s because we get a random sample of mom and dad’s genes, so if a particular trait requires an interaction of several genes, it’s unlikely we’ll get all of them so what good are any of them? It’s thus much better to have every gene (genomic variant) having at least a small effect, independent of other genes in its nexus.
At least for white people living in the West, Steve can predict your height from your DNA with a correlation of r = 0.64. That’s actually quite incredible considering he’s limited to only common genetic variants (who knows how much additional variance there is in rare variants and non-additive ones). How high will the correlation get when the whole genome becomes cheap enough to sequence in huge numbers?
Unfortunately the correlation drops when he tries to predict height in South Asia. Let’s say you have a gene that causes you to like milk and milk makes you grow tall. This gene will help predict your height in the West but perhaps not in India where milk is scarce so maybe stuff like that is why the correlation declines.
Of course it could also be that races differ in genetic architecture but Steve assumes they are the same (not sure why this should be the default assumption since we know, for example, whites and East Asians have different genes for white skin)
If they are the same, then Steve needs some international samples to force the machine learning to find truly causal equations that transcend culture and I would like to try these equations on ancient DNA to find out whether the decline in height (and brain size) during the Holocene was genetic or environmental.
Right now Steve can only predict IQ (within countries) with an accuracy of around 0.4 (he says) but that’s only because in the age of wokeism, it’s virtually impossible to sequence large samples of people who have taken quality IQ tests. He can see the accuracy trend-line is still rising as sample size increases, unlike his height predictor which already has such large samples that it has plateaued.
Once IQ predictors become as good as height, we’ll see a massive increase in average IQ and height as rich couples will use surrogate mothers to produced 100 fertilized eggs and only the top 1% from each couples’ eggs will be chosen.
I feel bad for my nieces and nephews (and RR’s baby) because they’re about to become part of a genetic underclass. Already 10% of Denmark babies are born through in vitro insemination. Within the next 30 years, those who are not will find themselves six inches shorter and 30 IQ points dumber than the youngest adults. And on top of that they might also be more ugly and less healthy. It’s even conceivable that life span will increase to 300 years.
Already the pace of technological progress has been rapid over the last hundred years, despite the fact that genetic IQ has been static or declining. Now just imagine how fast technology will progress when cultural evolution is combined with artificial high speed biological evolution.
Pumpkin Person 
some people prefer being slaves. sounds like two rr references
Kramer and Paepke each co-signed Bankman-Fried’s unsecured personal recognizance bonds, pledging property worth $500,000.
Tell me you’ve never written a paper without telling me you’ve never written a paper.
im starting to feel paranoid that some of my comments are being edited. like there are one or two words missing from some of my sentences.
for example i was trying to say Shasta is a terrible drink instead of it being a good drink.
if this keeps happening i may have to pull the plug.
tell me you think “writing a paper” is writing a bunch of ridiculous nonsense and then sprinkling in citations to unrelated papers you’ve never read without telling me you think “writing a paper” is writing a bunch of ridiculous nonsense and then sprinkling in citations to unrelated papers you’ve never read.
Did you??
Terroni et al, the paradox of humans having minds even being animals
RR was the recent long comment you left about Asian Americans intended as your guest post?
No, it got way too long to post here so I just posted the cliff note arguments in the comments.
Fair enough. I just approved it as a comment.
You would be interested in this old book and paper I came across.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Temperament_and_Race.html?id=M9UZAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_entity&hl=en&gl=US&ovdme=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Click to access ED543381.pdf
Thanks!
but yes. in america at least, papers laden with citations are NOT required even in the humanities at upper division, graduate level…AND humanities citations (citations in the RR sense) are IN-APPROPRIATE to the humanities with the exception of linguistics.
papers in non-woke subjects only exist in two forms:
1. the “i’ve made a discovery” and these are the papers that helped.
2. the review paper.
BOTH of these are FOR PUBLICATION and…
1. have been REVIEWED by many.
2. RR has never PUBLISHED a paper in any journal.
3. RIDICULOUS number of citations is a RED FLAG the paper is bullshit, the author DISHONEST.
When you make claims that aren’t common knowledge you need to cite them.
Imagining this sloppy genetic enginering like the “facial harmonization” beautiful results…
Capitalism is all about shaming people to make money with their lowered self esteem.
Transhumanism
And PP, he talked about height and genes correlation and not being tall and genes correlation as seems you commented, about whitepee like to drink otherspecies milk and beingcome taller. Actually Czech people have a central european avg height but higher rate of lactosis intolerance.
even if theyre 30 points smarter their intelligence will be useless unless they live a really wealthy lifestyle.
essentially the highest IQ people will come from normal backgrounds and grow up without an intellectually rich environment which will make many of them useless or low-functioning for their corresponding intelligence.
it sounds grandiose to use myself as an example here but if i sacrificed my social intellect or experiences whatever have you for a higher IQ it would mostly give me results that are not valuable enough for me.
im sure if technology rises then there will be an ability that they have that will make them superior but a lot of them will be deadweight because almost all things have already been invented or discussed so they wont have an intellectual outlet like we do in the year 2023.
only thing i wished theyd invented was teleportation. all of this technology bullshit is a burden on our society we needed to be advanced and practical like the extraterrestrials probably are otherwise our outlook will remain bleak!
but its too late now. all of society is ridiculously constrained to the modern technologies and thus will never have a necessity to innovate further!
with this in motion we should see a detrimental outlook for the planets future!
LOADED is the most wise and intelligent personality.
not being sarcastic pill.
LOADED is correct that peepee is BY FAR the worst personality.
i think i just dont like neurotic people to be honest like you can be neurotic at times too so can i but we keep it predictable.
unpredictable neuroticism is disgusting and will lead to hurt.
LOADED!!!!
Well then youre being downgraded. I thought the belief in jewish superman was a one off, but saying Loaded is the most intelligent….I’m sorry but youre a dumbass.
He also believes blacks would score about as high as whites on IQ tests if both races were raised in Bermuda.
Dude is off his rocker.
I mean the lights are on but nobody’s home. And nobody’s been home for a very, very long time.
jewish superman?
no idea what you’re talking about.
He’s talking about Jesus, dumbass. MY IQ is SO MUCH higher than yours.
He also believes blacks would score about as high as whites on IQ tests if both races were raised in Bermuda.
because THEY DO!
No they don’t. You debated this with Lion and got ripped to shreds.
“because THEY DO!”
So how??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_illiteracy
PP, do you think the correlation between IQ and functional illiteracy is high??
(and RR’s baby)
I hadn’t seen such gratuitous evil as that comment since they made Velma Dinkley a swarthy lesbian.
At the rate of genomes being sequenced everyone on the plant will be sequenced by 2033.
We will be able to edit our biology in 20 years so anyone can become superior in intelligence because of nanotechnology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nootropic
Imagine a “superior intelligence” of homossepiens…
intelligence is simply ridding yourself of biases when you use heuristics. that can be measured.
its an intuitive thought although very likely that this is the best definition for intelligence there is.
oh and i just came up with it.
steve shoe is the ultimate autistic zombie.
and that’s not to mention the more basic EVIL of IVF.
Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral. These techniques (heterologous artificial insemination and fertilization) infringe the child’s right to be born of a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. They betray the spouses’ “right to become a father and a mother only through each other.”
IVF Is Morally Unacceptable
The blithe acceptance of the enormous number of abortions involved in the process of in vitro fertilization vividly illustrates how the replacement of the conjugal act by a technical procedure—in addition to being in contradiction with the respect that is due to procreation as something that cannot be reduced to mere reproduction—leads to a weakening of the respect owed to every human being.
steve shoe is a SATANIST and a CRIMINAL!
PERIOD!
Being a son of an unknown millionaire. How bad it is!!
1984 + World Brave World and you’re dumb in any scenario.
Brave-new-World
New-World-Brave
Brave-World-Beav
Wave-Brew-Norld
Putin killing thousand of innocent people and animals= no satanism
imagine it:
rr talks to a homeless person about “social justice” and “equity” and the conversation ends when rr starts screaming “racist” at the homeless man.
The RR Show
The RR Show
rr: i can’t believe that homeless man has never read jewstein & jewberg 2003. what a racist!
Lol. Okay, that was kind of funny.
Mug is literally the only user i liked on here simply because he is competent enough to not step on peoples boundaries.
i thought blacks were similar but i realized theyre actually a bunch of pussies.
Mug lives up to the hype. cool guy.
rr goes to eastern kentucky to talk to coal miners about “equity”…
hijinx ensue.
coalminer: but we’re black too! can’t you see?
rr: dasss racisss!
ever since i started using the internet people have leeched off me for whatever they could get.
obviously it had to be sustainable so people manipulated me as well as they could to get the maximum effect.
anyways the moral of the story is society needs to be destroyed in order to allow for a different more adaptable species to come out and do the right thing for its progeny.
Pumpkin what the fuck man. i just posted a comment asking for empathy and you failed me.
is this how you treat the people doing the most for u damn
Please, PP
Yea Hsu has financial incentives to say this.
The genome isn’t additive. Fisher’s assumption in that paper was that there were no interactions. That is, they have independent effects on the phenotype. Genes will make the same contribution no matter the environment. So there are no gene-environment or gene-gene actions. That’s laughably false.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810388105
These assumptions are what the behavioral genetic enterprise and twin studies have been built on. It’s why we keep looking for ways to justify high h2 estimates from twin studies, wkth GCTA, and now GWAS and PRS. Maybe, just maybe, the heritability isn’t there because it doesn’t exist at all.
GxE and GxG create new environments for genes:
Already we can see that there is no single command level, no single dominant factor in charge, but a self-organizing global pattern formed among myriad components responding to environmental changes. Together these factors vastly expand the transcriptome—that is, ways in which the network responds and genes are utilized, according to context. Genes are very much the followers, not the leaders in the decision making.
Furthermore, trying to account for variation, even at this level, by deciding what is genetic and what is environmental is already quite impossible. Environmental structures regulate gene transcription, and every gene transcript becomes the environment of other genes. The resolution of those in cell responses then changes the external environment with feedback consequences, and so on. It is those dynamic patterns rather
than their elements that are important. (Richardson, 2017: 124-125)
Nevermind the ethical and moral issues along with the empirical issues with embryo selection, PRS, and embryo selection and PRS, it’s quite clear that the GATTACA fantasy from hereditarians will stay a fantasy.
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/37/10/2229/6646556
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(22)00157-2/fulltext
https://anderson-review.ucla.edu/embryo-selection-polygenic-scoring-and-unrealistic-expectations/
Nevermind the fact that it has “limited utility.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957074/
“GxE and GxG create new environments for genes:”
Yup and that means there is enormous complexity in how phenotypic expression is realized.
But I wouldn’t say it’s impossible to tease apart the independent effects; it’s just that HBDers cannot do this with the tools they like to champion. And let’s be honest; they’re not really interested in doing things “the right way.”
As AI and machine learning become more advanced, we’ll be able to detect things like epistasis more accurately, and we can finally put a lot of these assumptions and questions to rest.
when using the internet or any other form of service from an outside influence you sacrifice control over the situation.
i love to say it but more tech will only harm society not enhance it.
machine learning will be useless. only 8 billion people in so many different environments. not enough data.
hitler: more germans please.
shoe: let’s fit people to the societies (the environments) they themselves (or rather the power elite) have created rather than the reverse because autism.
great example: the pima of arizona vs the pima of mexico, separated only by the us-mexico border and diabetes risk. shoe would deselect all the pima embryos because autism.
“But I wouldn’t say it’s impossible to tease apart the independent effects; it’s just that HBDers cannot do this with the tools they like to champion. And let’s be honest; they’re not really interested in doing things “the right way.””
You’re a mixed race infant communist who listens to whatever they shove on the radio… you can’t really understand why people from a completely different background do what they do.
What makes you think that behavioral geneticists have the tools to tease a part G and E? How do you think they tease them a part?
“You’re a mixed race infant communist who listens to whatever they shove on the radio”
I haven’t liked the radio since I was 13. And I can understand different points of view; I’m not Philo.
the only people who have interviewed me are psychiatrists and police officers.
its so sad that the only thing they would want out of me is knowledge on how to corrupt me even further and that no one else really cares about me either.
two different things going on but one feeding into the other. if that doesnt make sense then fuck man nothing will for any of you.
This became way too massive to post here, but I have cliff notes of the arguments which I will post below. I promise it’s worth the read. It chronicles early Asian immigration, the selectivity of Asian populations in the 1900s and 2000s, and then attempts to show that hereditarian ideas of Asian academic achievement fail.
P1: If the unique cultural and socioeconomic resources of Asian American immigrants have allowed them to achieve high levels of success, then hyper-selectivity is true.
P2: Empirical evidence shows that Asian immigrants and their children have achieved high levels of success, outperforming other racial and ethnic groups in the US in education and income.
C: Thus, the hyper-selectivity thesis is true.
P1: If Asian American immigrants possess unique cultural and socioeconomic resources which allow them to receive high levels of success, then hyper-selectivity is true.
P2: If Asian American immigrants have achieved high levels of success in the US, then they possess unique cultural and socioeconomic resources.
C: Thus, if Asian American immigrants have high levels of success in the US, then hyper-selectivity is true.
Now let me connect these two arguments:
P1: If hyper-selectivity is true, then the academic achievements of Asian Americans is not due solely to socioeconomic Status.
P2: If the academic achievements of Asian Americans isn’t solely due to socioeconomic status, then the achievement gap between groups cannot be fully explained by socioeconomic status (but it can be explained by effort, not cognitive ability).
P3: Hyper-selectivity is true (see arguments above).
C: Thus the achievement gap between Asians and other races cannot be fully explained by socioeconomic status (1, 2, and 3)
P4: (Using addition) Overwhelming evidence shows that Asian Americans outperform other races in America, regardless of socioeconomic status.
C2: So hyper-selectivity remains the best explanation of Asian American academic success, despite critics who state it’s solely due to socioeconomic status (2, 3, and 4 using addition).
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/02/16/on-asian-immigration-to-the-united-states-hyper-selectivity-and-hereditarian-musings-on-asian-academic-success/
definitely autistic.
because focus on one thing excluding all others, autistic people MAY appear intelligent when talking about that one thing.
BUT they have nothing to say outside it.
AND YES! this has been SELECTED FOR…though not deliberately…just as a result of technological progress and its consequent specialization of labor.
“He wasn’t a complete human being at all. He was a tiny bit of one, unnaturally developed; something in a bottle, an organ kept alive in a laboratory. I thought he was a sort of primitive savage, but he was something absolutely modern and up-to-date that only this ghastly age could produce. A tiny bit of a man pretending he was the whole.”
― Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited
“definitely autistic.”
Love the armchair psychiatrists on PP’s blog.
“AND YES! this has been SELECTED FOR…though not deliberately…just as a result of technological progress and its consequent specialization of labor.”
Immigration act of 1965 was a big part of it.
Immigration act of 1965 was a big part of it.
wtf does that mean?
A big part of the hyper-selectivity of Asian Americans.
still have no idea what that has to do with what i said.
explain it to me peepee.
“Yellow humans are on avg dumber because my baby is a beautiful black trophy for globalist multiculturalism altar”.
Japzilians are descendent from poorer rural workers and today they are disproportionately among the zilian”elitis”. The same boring pattern everywhere.
RR is so negrophile he became asianphobic.
“Yellow humans are on avg dumber because my baby is a beautiful black trophy for globalist multiculturalism altar”
I didn’t say this. If you can provide a quote in which you think I did, be my guest. Talking about a baby like that just makes you look like a piece of shit. I held these views long before 10 months ago.
Stop mentioning your baby RR. You realize that there are plenty of people on this blog (and the internet) who have no filter… unless you’re autistic.
Being brainwashed to the evil globalism as you was is being a cake of shit.
Sad. Can’t provide a quote of me saying that. You’re talking about “evil globalism” but aren’t you a mixed-race Brazilian?
Someone correctly said on avg wokeist people in US are very ignorant about the world but they pretend they dont just following every statement of their masters.
Your question is VERY INTERESTING.
It’s may mean something about your own personal reasons to be this pseudo leftist.
RR’s Logic
If you are mixed race why you dont support anti racial preservationist kalergian views and policies???
Could be too
If you are rich why you dont support Donald Trump or billionaires??
You cant be more mediocre than that.
Oftentimes, more rational people evolve beyond this low level of self transcendence. And i can be self preservationist without being a jerk about other people or identities.
By American standard, i’m ‘latino’, but my phenotype is mostly southern european because it reflects my predominant iberian ancestry. But i have specially by my mother side non white ancestry. A typical “whitezilian”.
Another gratuitous dishonesty from our friend rr
If i dont said i’m a gobalist so i’m not a globalist.
So big comment but whatever the selected region a random east asian person academically outperform a subsaharian descent person in the majority of times. The same for northern and central european. Even for latin american without predominant subsaharian ancestry. The evidence is global. Lynn ling is right.
And this is not racism. Racism is a convenient lie (generalization by assumption of causality between phenotypical racial traits and mental traits) not an incovenient truth (the reality of an intersectional or non paralel correlation between phenotypical racial traits and mental traits).
“So big comment but whatever the selected region a random east asian person academically outperform a subsaharian descent person in the majority of times. The same for northern and central european. Even for latin american without predominant subsaharian ancestry.”
Give me a source. You constantly make empirical claims yet never provide empirical data.
“The evidence is global. Lynn ling is right.””
What’s the response to what I wrote against Lynn that Lynn is right?
Edward scissorhands hair,
I dont need to do that here and even if i never posted these facts in academic manner it doesnt mean they are fake or not real. And anyway even if i post them here you will never change your… Mind.
RR deny subsaharian blacks on avg underperform academically in almost places they are. A smarter wokeist at least would accept this fact to argue about the likely (pred determined) wokeist reasons, like and specially racism.
“RR deny subsaharian blacks on avg underperform academically in almost places they are. A smarter wokeist at least would accept this fact to argue about the likely (pred determined) wokeist reasons, like and specially racism.”
You made a specific empirical claim—do you remember what you said?
Hyper selectivity for me means
Only the richest immigrated to US.
Reality: no way
Only place i have seeing possible hyper selectivity is in Britain with some groups of african immigrants, specially igbos, right RR???
“(It can be explained by effort not cognitive ability)”
RR is so but so clues he STILL doesnt understand that motivation and cognitive levels are often interconected, one being an outcome of other.
“Hyper selectivity for me means
Only the richest immigrated to US.”
Then you’re wrong.
“Only place i have seeing possible hyper selectivity is in Britain with some groups of african immigrants, specially igbos, right RR???”
That’s true, and it’s the case for American Asians, Nigerians to America and Cubans.
“RR is so but so clues he STILL doesnt understand that motivation and cognitive levels are often interconected, one being an outcome of other.”
Hsin and Xie showed the opposite of your (uncited) claim.
…
I problematized your concept of hyper selectivity. To be hyper selected it must be VERY something.
Its problably the case for Indian and Middle Eastern (American) Asians but not for East Asian Americans…
Shao Kan and Kung Lao showed if you like martial arts and you have some traits which help you to thrive on it so you can win the Mortal Kombat tournament.
Most people who master some specific domain tend to like it too much. They are interconected, clueless, like you and your passion trying to debunk heresytarianism. Do you love to write in your blog riiight???
Problably probubbly
You didn’t problematize anything, you’re straight up wrong.
“Its problably the case for Indian and Middle Eastern (American) Asians but not for East Asian Americans…”
It is the case for American Asians, those who are 1.5 and 2nd generation. I would give you references but I know you’re allergic. And there’s the fact that your other claim is straight up false.
Of course i did. Hyper selectivity means a VERY selectivity. You are assuming most American East Asians are descendent from immigrants with wealthy background??
I dont said Asian Americans, i said East Asian Americans, dishonest devil.
Hyper-selectivity refers to immigrants having a higher educational level than those who stayed and immigrants having a higher percentage of college graduates compared to their host country. They are descended from these people. “Asian Americans” comprises “East Asian Americans”, and in Lee and Zhou’s study in their book, they specifically describe Chinese and Taiwanese immigrants. But keep talking like you know anything about this issue.
Your self awareness is so low you still didn’t realize people are laughing at your extremely over-citation about other people’ works. It’s painfully ridiculous…
1. Hyper selectivity can mean anything as long as is being hyper selected (mister obvious is sponsoring this comment)
2. Even if East Asian Americans were hyper selected in the first and second generations, it doesn’t mean their avg IQ is lower as you are conjecturing. Average Japanese IQ based on 2,4 million students is around 104. I doubt Han Chinese and Korean IQ isway lower than that.
”Hyper-selectivity refers to immigrants having a higher educational level than those who stayed and immigrants having a higher percentage of college graduates compared to their host country.”
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/29/key-facts-about-asian-origin-groups-in-the-u-s/
”There are wide disparities in income among Asian origin groups. Asian households in the U.S. had a median annual income of $85,800 in 2019, higher than the $61,800 among all U.S. households. But only two Asian origin groups had household incomes that exceeded the median for Asian Americans overall: Indians ($119,000) and Filipinos ($90,400). Most of the other origin groups were well below the national median for Asian Americans, including the two with the lowest median household incomes – Burmese ($44,400) and Nepalese ($55,000).
As with education and income, poverty rates vary widely among Asians in the U.S. Asians Americans had a poverty rate of 10% in 2019, 3 percentage points lower than the overall U.S. poverty rate (13%). Mongolian and Burmese had the highest poverty rates among all Asian origin groups, at 25% – more than twice the national average and about four times the poverty rates among Indians (6%).”
”The differences in educational attainment among national origin groups PARTLY reflect the levels of education immigrants bring to the U.S. For example, three-quarters of Indian Americans had a bachelor’s degree or more education in 2019. Many of them already had a bachelor’s degree when they arrived in the U.S. with visas for high-skilled workers. Since 2001, half of H-1B visas – which require a bachelor’s degree or equivalent – have gone to Indians.”
”The share of Asian Americans ages 25 and older with at least a bachelor’s degree varies greatly by origin group. Those of Indian (75%), Malaysian (65%), Mongolian (60%) or Sri Lankan (60%) origin are more likely than other Asian origin groups to have at least a bachelor’s degree. By comparison, fewer than one-in-five Laotians (18%) and Bhutanese (15%) have at least a bachelor’s degree. Roughly a third of all Americans ages 25 and older had a bachelor’s degree or more education in 2019.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000949
Japanese north–south gradient in IQ predicts differences in stature, skin color, income, and homicide rate
rr is unaware that “academic success” is meaningless without specifying the time and place and the measure…because he is mentally retarded and evil. his hair says it all. aesthetics don’t lie.
This authoritative book shows how the gap between a group’s mean IQ and achievement can be precisely measured, and then partitioned between two factors — an important methodology with potential application for all ethnic groups. In this case, the author shows that Chinese Americans’ occupational achievements are generally far beyond their IQ — as if they had a mean IQ 21 points higher than they actually do. This unique approach to explaining group achievement emphasizes non-IQ factors such as historical origins, family, work ethic, educational tradition, personality traits, and social institutions.
More »
Putting aside the fact that IQ isn’t a cause, what do you think that means? You say that as if it goes against the Lee and Zhou thesis.
^^^dishonest clown troll^^^
time = what year is it? what epoch? what state of technical, scientific, and material progress?
place = what country is it? what edumacation system is it?
measure = what degrees? from what schools? in what subjects? grades? or scores on cumulative exams?
dunning kruger = rr = peepee = sad
Whatever the region around the globe a non selected group of african descent blacks live, exactly the same avg behaviours like high criminal rates, low academic performance, low avg empathy, high sexual impulsivity…
RR et charlatanigans use extremely posh academic-like jargonic language to obscure the truth, they have an evil agenda, knowing or not, to justify in “scientific” and “philosophical” way the new world order of the new stage of globalism: neoliberalism and wokeism as its official “secular religion”. To create a globalist order it’s important to create new Myths that justify it like the denialism of human racial groups reality and their intrinsic differences.
“Whatever the region around the globe a non selected group of african descent blacks live, exactly the same avg behaviours like high criminal rates, low academic performance, low avg empathy, high sexual impulsivity…”
Source? Remember that Cernovsky and Littman paper you blew off the other day? It showed findings opposite of Rushton because Rushton… Cherry-picked like you claim I did but didn’t provide evidence for. But I’ve come to expect uncited claims from you over the years
Pseudo intelectuals from academia always require citations while real intellectuals require arguments, explanations, development of thinking lines, ideas…
I felt so bad after Cherny and Lit had destroyed my fragile biases oh nooooo
You don’t even make arguments you merely make unevidenced claims.
santo, did you know that peepee’s IQ is a lot higher than bill gates’s because petals around the rose “puzzle”?
“You don’t even make arguments you merely make unevidenced claims.”
That’s all your “apriori” arguments are anyway. Just because Santocool doesn’t write them in the form of a syllogism doesn’t mean your arguments are any better.
And your empirical claims for every human having the same intelligence potential are based on flimsier evidence and data than the ample evidence for G from all sorts methodologies. That’s why it’s pointless to cite evidence against your claims. You’ll claim test bias, sample bias, etc. on any study showing racial IQ differences and if more evidence points towards your specific claims you’ll just cite those.
Where is the “ample evidence for G from all sorts of methodologies”? Hereditarians posit g as a brain property. So if there is “ample evidence”, then cite 3 papers.
“That’s why it’s pointless to cite evidence against your claims. You’ll claim test bias, sample bias,”
There is “ample evidence”, but it’s pointless to cite it?
“if more evidence points towards your specific claims you’ll just cite those.”
IQ-ists make a slew claims that don’t pass conceptually. They make numerous assumptions that haven’t been validated in any manner. So I’m justified in my dismissal of IQ-ist claims.
“There is “ample evidence”, but it’s pointless to cite it?”
yes you retard because as I just said you can always claim sample/test bias because of your apriori mind-body dualism.
Where’s the evidence?
Arguments about evidence??
Arguments are often needed in REALLY disputed claims. This fake like yourour philolsophy.
Every day i seeing my evidences walking in the streets and behaving exactly in the way i have perceived. I cant collect very similar observations just look at avg behaviours racial, Gender, sexual orientatiion by people from different background around the globe.
Since 60’s, globalists make any discussion about racial differences and hereditarianism a kind of supreme heresy. You have in your favor decades of full corruption of these related fields while left for us few scholars who are interested and commited to study about it. It exactly like what happened with heliocentrism in the time of Copernicus and Galileu. You re so delusional that you cant accept you are like the Catholic Church was in that period. You’re a modern obscurantist.
I can collect…
Mug, it’s not a psychological test?
If you make a claim, you need an argument to back it. It’s that simple.
change people to fit their society VS change society to fit people
hmmm!
the former is satanic.
the latter is not.
man (and all animals) are an end in themselves, NEVER a means to an end.
see pierre bezukhov’s closing soliloquy.
that was a mugabe citation. in case you didn’t catch it as such.
“ideology” is very important concept rr has yet to get autistic about.
start with marx’s definition of “ideology”, then you will see how it can be generalized.
at it’s most general it means: treating man made institutions as if they were NOT man made, but features of Nature, like the tides, or the moon, or tarantulas, or whatever…
rr doesn’t know he’s in a cul de sac. sad.
sadly…
there’s more where that came from…and by “that” i mean EtOH. — mogabe
the “many genes of small effect” shtick is OBVIOUSLY RETARDED as there are…
Seventeen years after the initial publication of the human genome, we still haven’t found all of our genes. The answer turns out to be more complex than anyone had imagined when the Human Genome Project began.
The two initial human genome papers reported 31,000 [2] and 26,588 protein-coding genes [3], and when the more complete draft of the genome appeared in 2004 [4], the authors estimated that a complete catalog would contain 24,000 protein-coding genes. The Ensembl human gene catalog described in that paper (version 34d) had 22,287 protein-coding genes and 34,214 transcripts.
https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-018-0564-x
shoe: but i can make superhumans with my company.
mugabe: no you can’t. you fucking GRIFTER!
and then i hear that voice in my head again…
“two extras in case of difficulty…and now i’m gonna give it up to chic anderson to call the race…”
Explaining for RR et his bests how human behavior works
Explaining for RR et his bests how human behavior works
Well, i was born in the late 1980s and lived in the city of my birth until the mid of 90’s. I remember during my first childhood i already was very imaginative, had special interests like playing with monsters and dinosaurs and didn’t remember being shy until my family and I moved to another city. Quite the opposite, i was a bold and precociously proud little boy. Then I became very shy living in the new city which I’m still now. But this change also coincided with my transition from first to second childhood. Whatever, what’s happened is that i became very shy, also influenced by the financial problems of my family at that time, my stuttering, my increasing self perception of being different and the non receptiveness of the new social environment. Summarizing, specially or predominantly because of my intrinsicities. All these factors in combination conspired to trigger a seemingly dormant predisposition of my scope, shyness. If I lived in very differently better environment, significantly more receptive or less hostile, I think I would have reacted in a different and possibly better way. Also it is interesting to highlight i’m relatively phenotypically similar to my mother (verbally gifted in our first language) as well my older brother, both of us are left handed and atheist but just me who is on lgbtard spectrum. My mid brother is phenotypically my father and also relatively more similar to him in behavior. From my mother’s side I have two uncles (one deceased), both with mental disorder, particularly social anxiety and my “surviving” maternal uncle also is a pathological liar.
This is a kind of autobiographical record which can help to understand human development and behavior and their influences.
In short, it seems my shyness* is not only environmental neither only genetic or biological. But if i didn’t had any predisposition to become shy, probably, i would have never did. So many people have experience very similar situations or contexts to mine but have reacted/react differently.
*Currently under good control.
This technology has a long way to go. Puppy saying it will be in place in 30 years is too optimistic. More like 70 years. Some of these genes for IQ are not additive. I suspect they will make people smart and the people will be like Ganzir and Bruno which is horrifying to many parents.
peepee believes is a negro superwoman.
“more ugly and less healthy.”
For a look at how far environmental influences go, look at the Weston Price stuff on facial structure. Only a single digit percentage of parents have the knowledge and ability to truly optimize physical development of their offspring. If you want to give your children an advantage in life, help them to develop into a beautiful person.
every time peepee blinks she loses ALL MEMORIES. the lights go out.
she is mentally retarded as noted by misdreavus.
https://humanvarieties.org/2013/05/03/hvgiq-bermuda/
You mean the Misdreavus that I systematically ripped to shreds to the point where he never showed his face again and deleted his social media.
That Misdreavus?
read the link peepee! share with the rr personality.
If mugli really think bermuda environment is magical in that way, my impression about him will be even lower. Tankie jewsuschristian neonazi and fake heresytarian, what???
Smart: rr you are environmentalist
RR: what is “environmentalism” ??
RR: you are hereditarianist, i”m not an environmentalist because myour thoughts are just facts…
What’s wrong with the article?
superman’s birth name is kal-el, intentionally hebraic.
and rr/pill/peepee believes in soros and robert rubin.
so “jewish superman” could mean a lot of things peepee.
and such an appellation for jesus is so utterly retarded i didn’t suspect pill was that low IQ.
so “jewish superman” could mean a lot of things peepee.
Which is what makes it such a g loaded problem. You have to infer from the context and the POV of Pill, who he’s talking about. Now obviously Pill didn’t mean Rubin & Soros because he’s the one who talks about them while you’re the one who believes Jesus had the superpower to rise from the dead which Pill has mocked you for in the past.
You either have the g to make all these connections or you don’t. You can’t train it, you can’t teach it, you can’t learn it in a book; you either have it, or you don’t.
And baby, you don’t.
And baby, you don’t.
indeed. sadly. plus you are a female.
it’s totally NOT obvious to anyone who doesn’t hate jesus and doesn’t have a LOW IQ like you peepee.
pill has also said the media is controlled by jews as the result of a conspiracy whereas (he claims) i think it has happened by accident.
pill has also said the media is controlled by jews as the result of a conspiracy whereas (he claims) i think it has happened by accident.
You’re overthinking it which is another sign of low g.
No have such thing low g. All people have often significant differences on their strenghts and weaknesses, specially people with higher IQ.
i find myself to be the most lucid commenter on this blog.
indeed. peepee loves horror and hates jesus for the same reason LOW IQ + psychopath.
Idiot.
You re more lucid when nobody is being compared to you.
peepee’s blog is a LOW IQ test for anti-christs.
peepee takes her blog WAY too seriously. WAY more seriously than anyone except the rr and pill personalities.
afro noted this too.
Believe it or not I don’t think Soros or Rubin agree on most things. So I wouldn’t lump them together.
They’re both super powerful brilliant Jews, but that’s where the similarities end. Soros probably opposed the Iraq War while Rubin strikes me as a neocon (though I have no evidence).
If you take the one percent best meal served in an average house in a city, there is a high chance it won’t be as good as the one percent best meal prepared in that city. Shitty cookers don’t improve that much.
And if you were to serve everyday those best meals, it could end being quite unhealthy and frankly disgusting.
So I don’t think that even with a 100% correlation and an ability to get the top 2sd of your best genes, you would find that huge of an improvement. But there will probably be lots of negative unintended consequences.
So super humans are not for tomorrow 😊
All they need to do is flip 100 bases out of the billions in your genome from negative to positive to cause a 1 SD increase in complex phenotypes.
Also, with healthy young surrogate mothers producing up to 100 eggs each, you’ll be choosing the top 1% of your unborn kids.
Think about the huge variation between the smartest & dumbest child in a typical large family and then imagine the variation if the family had 100 kids.
Even the dumbest parents can produce 1 smart kid if they have 100 embryos to choose from.
If Bill Gates really wants to help Africa, he should bring them this technology ASAP. But I suspect that’s not what he’s trying to do and the publicity would be brutal.
If Bill Gates wants to help Africa he would literally send condoms in the post to every household and fund it for 20 years.
It’s based on the false assumption that there are genes “for” traits, which doesn’t even make sense. To claim there is a gene/s “for” traits has one slide into genetic determinism which is, as we’ve known for decades, a false ideology. See my references above for why PGS for “IQ” won’t work.