The largest study ever of American ethnic IQ differences in a representative sample is the Coleman study. Here we saw 5 different ethno-racial groups compared at multiple ages on 5 different mental tests. The study involved 645,000 students from 4000 public schools. All test scores were expressed using a scale where the Americans on the whole average 50 with a standard deviation of 10.
Because American Indians and Oriental Americans come from non-English homes I decided to use the non-verbal test as the most valid measure of general intelligence. And because the environmental inequality between these races compounds every year like compound interest, I decided to compare them in the first grade before environment has had much time to cause differences.
The other reason for using the non-verbal test is it consists of conceptual problems like figure series which are neither verbal nor spatial but purely abstract and thus a pure measure of general intelligence that is not significantly biased towards verbal or spatial thinkers.
I wanted the scores to be expressed as IQs using white norms so the white mean of 54.1 was equated to IQ 100 and the white SD was equated to 15.
I don’t in fact know the white SD on these tests but historically the white SD is about 97% as large as the American SD so I assume it was 9.7.
Using these parameters, we get the following IQs:
Oriental Americans: 104
White Americans: 100 (by definition)
American Indians: 98
Mexican Americans: 94
Puerto Ricans: 87
The American Negro: 83
Estimated score of the American pure Negro: 78*
What these numbers suggest is that when anatomically modern humans evolved in Sub-Saharan Africa about 200,000 years ago, we had an average IQ of about 78, however leaving the tropics to survive the cold ice age caused massive natural selection for IQ. Indeed by the end of the Last Glacial Maximum, commenter Melo discovered that brain size in Europe had reached 1512 cc (60 cc higher than it was before humans left Africa).
Assuming a within-sex, within ethnic brain size standard deviation of 91 cc, and assuming a brain size IQ correlation of 0.4, this 0.65 SD increase in brain size implies a 0.65/0.4 = 1.63 SD increase in IQ (24 points). Not all that different from the 22 point IQ gap between white Americans and the estimated IQ of full-blooded African Americans.
The fact that there’s virtually no IQ gap between white Americans and American Indians suggests human intelligence (like human brain size) peaked at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum.
Then as Native Americans headed South, the warm hospitable climate required less intelligence and we see a rare example of backwards evolution, thus explaining why despite white admixture, the Mexican Americans score lower than their indigenous cousins in the U.S..
Puerto-Ricans, like Africans Americans, are hybridized blacks but with slightly more white admixture, thus explaining why they score a bit higher too.
Meanwhile the incredible scores of Oriental Americans is not at all explained by selective immigration. Indeed in the 1960s, most Orientals were descended from railroad indentured laborers and thus, if anything, were below the average of their home countries. Rather, the high East Asian IQ can be explained by Northern Siberia being the coldest (and thus most cognitively demanding) place modern humans ever lived in large numbers
*estimated by assuming American blacks are 75% whites and thus dividing their deviation from whites by 0.75.
Pumpkin Person 
“And because the environmental inequality between these races compounds every year like compound interest, I decided to compare them in the first grade before environment has had much time to cause differences.”
Why? We know that there are factors that could explain a lion’s share of the gap. Eg
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8625720/
See also
Click to access w17610.pdf
“What these numbers suggest”
These numbers don’t “suggest” anything like what you’re—predictably—trying to say. Like I said last week, one conclusion of the report was that underprivileged black life learned better in integrated classrooms, and this was one of the many reasons why segregation was abolished—the same segregation that Jensen fought so hard to keep. And then the authors of Children of the Dream found the same.
“Meanwhile the incredible scores of Oriental Americans is not at all explained by selective immigration. Indeed in the 1960s, most Orientals were descended from railroad indentured laborers and thus, if anything, were below the average of their home countries. Rather, the high East Asian IQ can be explained by Northern Siberia being the coldest (and thus most cognitively demanding) place modern humans ever lived in large numbers”
Wrong.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2578933
And the fact of the matter is, hyper-selectivity—where Asian immigrants import class-specific cultural frames of mind, along with them being more highly educated than those who stay behind—explains Asian American achievement.
You should read Erika Lee’s The Making of Asian America and Jennifer Lee’s and Min Zhou’s The Asian American Achievement Paradox.
“however leaving the tropics to survive the cold ice age caused massive natural selection for IQ.”
Kevin Bird showed that hereditarian claims of natural selection on “IQ” between blacks and whites isn’t supported using PGS. And another racist hereditarian card falls.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.24216
But according to you, natural selection is not a thing so Bird testing for it must be pseudoscience.
He merely used the standard tests for polygenic selection. So it shows in my eyes, even giving hereditarian assumptions that the hypothesis is clearly flawed.
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412
Polygenic studies are still in their infancy and Bird admits his study had many limitations:
Before further discussion of the results, several important limitations
should be made clear. First, the low genetic and phenotypic variance
explained by lead SNPs and the lower sample size of within-family
analyses reduces the power for both tests of polygenic selection
(CP and EA). While the results presented here are more consistent
with neutral evolution rather than divergent natural selection, it is not
possible to rule out that data sets with more power could present dif-
ferent results. Additionally, although within-family effect sizes are rec-
ommended over between-family effect sizes, if the within-family
effect sizes are re-estimated for SNPs ascertained by a between-
family GWAS, there is still likely to be some level of confounding from
population structure (Cox et al., 2019; Zaidi & Mathieson, 2020). Sec-
ond, I am not able to account for the complete gap in scores and
attainment between groups without full coverage of genetic variation
that contributes to group differences. Analyses presented here only
partially account for the gap in scores, or make assumptions that the
unobserved genetic variants will have similar distribution to the
observed genetic variants. Third, the effect sizes used here were esti-
mated for European samples from this meta-analysis and then applied
to the independent and more diverse 1000 Genomes Projects sam-
ples, which have no corresponding phenotype data. Finally, without
environmental measurements and corresponding phenotype data for
the 1000 Genomes Project samples, it is not possible to test for gene-
by-environment interactions or gene-by-gene interactions.
The fact of the matter is, Bird showed that there is no “selection for” IQ-related genes, falsifying the hereditarian hypothesis using their own assumptions. You’re merely grasping for straws.
I don’t buy it and one of the reasons I don’t buy it we know very little about the genes for intelligence, particularly those that were causal during the Out of Africa exodus and of course those are the most relevant.
Sounds like we just have to wait another X amount of years, right? By then, GWAS/PGS will be noted as a failure (as people have rightly argued for years), but by then the new toy on the block will be around. Just like Richard Lerner said, it’s a game of “whack-a-mole”—hereditarianism will never die because people have vested interests in it.
Nevermind the fact that the so-called “taboo” on their “research” hereditarians talk about so much is nonexistent.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346142767_The_Mythical_Taboo_on_Race_and_Intelligence
But of course, scientific racism in psychology won’t be ended by new science. Wonder why that is?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959354320925176
Peeps, i know this article is partly as a response to my comment that head size alone doesnt determine intelligence.
This is the kind of info you should use to counter my point. Kudos. Not just more articles about head size. You could also use pisa scores etc
Also, i am interested in seeing how you will counter my points about relatively fewer achievements of Orientals over whites and specifically ashkenajis. Speaking of ashkenazis, could you post more data/articles about iq score comparisons between orientals and ashkenazis in america or elsewhere.
Also, this statement was funny: ”And because the environmental inequality between these races compounds every year like compound interest…”. Use more humor in your articles peeps. Makes it a more interesting read.
although pisa scores also depend on the quality of schools especially government schools in a country. Govt (government or publicly funded) schools in countries like india are very bad compared to those in china. So pisa scores between countries with equally good scores should be considered more.
Have you heard of all of the Chinese cheating rings that have gotten busted in America and China for standardized tests? What about how Lynn completely ignored numerous Chinese IQ studies that went against his a priori bias? What about how China only selects 4 of the highest scoring provinces for inclusion in PISA?
Sinophobic. I see. But if these chineses were jewish blacks???
Haha how is it “sinophobic” to call out the ways the Chinese cheat?
I didn’t but good to know.
Surprised by the Indian Americans scoring highly. I think they mean south asians puppy rather than native americans. That would be a lot more believable.
South Asians kind of break your cold weather hypothesis because they have high natural IQs like the jews.
I am south-asian and i have to say they are not as smart as jews. Not just because of absence of exposure to weather as cold as that which jews were exposed to but jews also underwent ‘filtering’ (unable to think of a better word now) to select for smartness over thousands of years span.
Indians have a phenotype in terms of body shape that is either basically East Asian or at least between East Asian and Caucasian. They should actually be expected to have a higher IQ than Middle Easterners or Hispanics who are more phenotypically Caucasian but still dark. The fact that their IQs are higher than blacks is not really a knock against cold winter, as much as it shows that a lack of cold winter or a large amount of UV radiation will lower the intelligence even in phenotypically high IQ people.
Also I’m pretty sure the average IQ of India is way below 100, which is far lower than morphologically similar races in areas with cold winters. Better nutrition and plumbing will not make up for the huge gap.`
Also, AFAIK, Jews don’t really have too different bodies from whites. They don’t have increased general levels of neoteny which is basically the Rushton progressive evolution indicator… besides being slightly shorter and not being fans of manual labor.
“a lack of cold winter or a large amount of UV radiation will lower the intelligence even in phenotypically high IQ people.”
What’s the argument for this claim?
The argument is seeing it empirically verified across the world.
Yea that’s just ad hoc bullshit to save the CWT and hereditarianism from falsification. Just like the Inuit population size claim. Bird refuted hereditarianism, using their own assumptions.
Cold climate and high intelligence is a correlation not a causation. It’s not “cold climate make people light skinned and smarter”. Caucasian light skin was mostly resulted from sexual selection. If was true that cold climate has a direct influence on it so why the ancestrals of east asians included peoples like siberians and their relatives in american arctic, the inuits, don’t developed the same very fair skin like europeans?? Because their already moderately light skin is enough to live in cold places. I don’t get only their diets that helps them to survive around the polar circle. Even europeans who live in arctic places need to take vitamin from a natural or synthetic source to not becoming deficient on it. About intelligence, high IQ is a direct product of civilization or better, high IQ caused the civilization and then civilized environments pressure people to adapt based on their circumstances even thought it hasn’t been homogeneously like that start from the assumption these places since agriculture invention has been exceptionally inequal. Migration to different places helped to increase human intelligence. Colder places are far distant from where humans originated first and very different too, as well temperated places. All these factors logically contributed to increase human intelligence but not enough to very high human intelligence like three IQ digits. It’s a matter of necessity and because IQ is mostly about its verbal part: vocabulary, grammar, mathematics (abstract thinking), it wasnt necessary know to write, read, do complex math or think about concepts before the dawn of civilization even thought it wasnt less challenging based on what archaic humans have to survive and adapt in terms of cognitive, cultural and technological tools.
I think Santo might be right. Especially about the natives of the arctic which puppy never explains. But white skin is probably selected by the environment in my opinion in order for it to appear in the first place. Then it became sexually selected for.
Anyways, you guys are wrong. Theres just too much evidence that when south asians are raised in 1st world conditions they have the same cognitive profile as east asians but maybe a bit better at social intelligence.
Most of these child geniuses these days are south asians. Theres something in the south asian genotype. South asians have been ceos of all the top tech cos, banks and management consultancies. Its basically impossible for that to happen without genetics.
The Indians in America are almost more intelligent than Ashkenazi Jews. They’re joining the Forbes 400, CEO of Microsoft, driving Jews out of medical field, dominating physics departments in top universites. However the Indians in the Caribbean are almost less intelligent than African Americans.
South asians that settle in the caribbean and Africa always rise to the top in those places. They seem to be very upwardly mobile wherever they settle. Britains PM is an indian. Theres too much evidence puppy. You need to abandon cold winter theory unless you can explain them + inuit + south americans.
They rise to the top in Africa & Caribbean because the competition is black people. They rise to the top in the U.S. because hyper-selective immigration. India itself is a Third World country.
Inuits did not experience much more cold than Europeans and probably score as high or higher than whites on non-verbal pre-school tests.
Mathematics was invented by indians stolen by arabs when they invaded the subcontinent and exported to Europe. I don’t believe only cold climate ncreased human intelligence but it probably was one of the factors. Anyway the universal factor is how difficult is to adapt and in the pre historical period there are no easy environment. I was reading that book. I stopped when Harari started to talk how human races have no genetic or biological differences in behavior and intelligence. I just can’t read pseudoscience. But still is interesting by the non propaganda or actual historical knowledge this book contains.
”Inuits did not experience much more cold than Europeans”
…
Indian subcontinent has been heavily populated since the dawn of human civilizations. Big population = more favorable mutations to high intelligence?? Hypothesis often used to explain inuit not so intelligence and long time adapting to cold climate?
Good point Santo!
India is the most densely populated place on Earth. Population density arguably increases IQ by adding more mutations as you say, but also by increasing competition as Melo noted.
I wonder why PP accepts hyper-selectivity for one group but not another (Asians)? I mean, it’s crystal clear. Combine the standardized test cheating in China and America, and their selective placement of which provinces to put in PISA to inflate their scores, and it’s clear that the educated are who are coming, and this then explains the educational success of 1.5 and 2nd generation immigrants.
Because hyper-selectivity only occurs when people want to leave their country for a much better one. China is a much more developed country than India so the incentive for the best and brightest to leave is much less.
Further, the data I posted was from the 1960s when Chinese Americans were descended from indentured railroad servants so if anything, were selected for low IQ.
Did you read Hirschman and Wong (1987) when I cited it the other day? Japanese immigrants before the 60s were selected; they had similar levels of achievement to white Americans. Sure, not all were selected in the manner I’m saying, but there are other aspects of the immigrant experience that would attest to such score differences, as they argue in the paper.
Do you reject the claim that Asian immigrants after 1964 were highly selected? It’s pretty much a known fact and it’s why they excel in America today. Jane Joon (2007) has a good paper on the issue, and of course Lee and Zhou’s work on this matter is paramount to any type of discussion on Asian American achievement. And Hsin and Xie showed thsg academic effort, not “cognitive ability” explains the Asian-White achievement gap.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1407309111
I’ll write something for your blog soon on Asian-White achievement gap and selective migration.
As long as you write it EXCLUSIVELY for my blog. I don’t want to see a duplicate appearing on your blog.
Fine.
Peeps,
Denser populated regions also means lesser fresh air, more pollution, more infections which also lead to repressed intelligence.
Peeps, also indian Americans drink more than Chinese Americans which also affects iq.
Also peeps, I think you are mistaken that only the brightest Indians emigrate to the west. I know 7-8 people who emigrated to the states and none of them were even school toppers or something and some of them weren’t even their class toppers.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-civil-service
Name, we are talking about since thousand years ago indian subcontinent has sustained a big population, a main feature of all complete civilization. Even thought the caste system may have contributed negatively to raise avg indian intelligence in contrast to chinese milenar meritocratic system. Anyway seems indian genotypical avg IQ is around 90, not bad at all.
in order to achieve anything in this world the first thing you need is creditability telling yourself you have that without acknowledging the problem of skepticism of how people will treat you will result in counterproductive results.
I found this lightskinned East Indian woman to have a very high “IQ”.
https://scontent.feat1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/54385141_1269616913190149_1658588534308601856_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=9267fe&_nc_ohc=3RR3Iyk_h0cAX99GBCv&_nc_ht=scontent.feat1-1.fna&oh=00_AfCFFcLDWWlrkQM5nqpWwEDioYhM-6E53nys_15bO0jfdw&oe=640B8128
exactly!
rr is afraid that looking at gay sex will turn him gay.
it won’t.
but it might PROVE…
that the “g-spot” is a thing…like a burmese ruby…basically it doesn’t exist…
Lmao, what the hell are you talking about?
The non-verbal favours east asians. There is a well known imbalance there where east asians score high on non-verbal vs verbal tasks.
I watched the Bernie Madoff documentary on netflix. Man, these jews are like walking stereotypes at this stage. What was crazy about Madoff was that he targeted jews at the start. However I didn’t know they actually recovered $14b/$19b that was stolen. The trustee did a great job on that I must say. The other notable thing was that his right hand man was an italian who barely graduated high school like RR.
Source??
“The other reason for using the non-verbal test is it consists of conceptual problems like figure series which are neither verbal nor spatial but purely abstract and thus a pure measure of general intelligence”
It’s not, silly.
“we see a rare example of backwards evolution”
Rare?
“thus explaining why despite white admixture, the Mexican Americans score lower than their indigenous cousins in the U.S”
Avg mexican american is among the poorest of mexicans and then more amerindian than european.
Do you knew inuits tend to have a better spatial intelligence, right?
“Indeed in the 1960s, most Orientals were descended from railroad indentured laborers and thus, if anything, were below the average of their home countries. Rather, the high East Asian IQ can be explained by Northern Siberia being the coldest (and thus most cognitively demanding) place modern humans ever lived in large numbers”
In that time, majority of chinese are very poor if compared to american. It’s common when people who were graduated in so called prestigious fields in underdeveloped countries emigrate to developed ones work in less prestigious jobs due to huge difference between standard living. You’re assuming east asian intelligence was sculpted by the last glaciation and didn’t changed since. I don’t think they reached avg IQ 100 or more in that time but throught the appex of their civilization. The biggest difference between three and two IQ digits is the amount of abstract thinking and symbolic or semantic storage capacity an individual can support. It’s not really necessary to adapt well in natural environments. The imost recent increase of IQ is mostly due to the emergence of written language.
“a 0.65/0.4 = 1.63 SD increase in IQ (24 points).”
Why are you dividing instead of multiplying here? I sort of understand the reasoning if you were trying to convert the height of NBA players to IQ, but I’m not sure why you’re doing that here.
“Then as Native Americans headed South, the warm hospitable climate required less intelligence and we see a rare example of backwards evolution”
Southern Native Americans are more intelligent than their northern counterparts. That’s why they developed a civilization relatively more complex than any other in an environment notoriously difficult for forming societies. Even the Amazon rainforest was largely built by the Native inhabitants through hundreds of years of selective breeding on plants and animals that benefitted humans.
Plus, Native North Americans have an average brain size of 1300cc.
Why are you dividing instead of multiplying here? I sort of understand the reasoning if you were trying to convert the height of NBA players to IQ, but I’m not sure why you’re doing that here.
The NBA is selected for basketball performance which is a proxy for height which is a proxy for IQ. So in that case we would multiply their height Z score by the height vs IQ correlation because the IQ, being only a proxy of a proxy of the selected variable, should be less extreme than height which in turn should be less extreme than basketball performance.
Now if we assume cold climates require more survival skills (which I know you disagree with), then we’d divide the brain size Z score because IQ is a proxy for survival skills and brain size is just a proxy for IQ so obviously, the proxy would be less selected than the more directly selected variable and dividing makes the more directly selected variables more extreme (the more direct the selection, the more extreme the selected variables become)
On the other hand, if you believe that the correlation between latitude and brain size (which even HBD deniers accept) is caused by thermo-regulation and not be the cold requiring more survival skills, then you would multiply because in that case brain size is closer to the directly selected variable and IQ is just the spandrel.
Or it could be both, in which case we wouldn’t multiply or divide since they cancel each other out.
Southern Native Americans are more intelligent than their northern counterparts. That’s why they developed a civilization relatively more complex than any other in an environment notoriously difficult for forming societies. Even the Amazon rainforest was largely built by the Native inhabitants through hundreds of years of selective breeding on plants and animals that benefitted humans.
An alternative theory is that Southern Native Americans (like Middle Easterners who also created an independent civilization) were a goldilocks people. Cold adapted enough to be smart, but in a warm enough location for exploiting the land.
Or they could indeed just be smarter, which a progressive evolutionary model would predict given how recent they are.
Plus, Native North Americans have an average brain size of 1300cc.
When?
You’re right; my bad. I had that backward.
“dividing makes the more directly selected variables more extreme ”
So, IQ is more directly selected than brain size because of its direct relation to survival skills, in the same way that height is selected in NBA players more than IQ because of its direct relation to Basketball skills. Thus, if there was a change in IQ that you assumed caused an increase in brain size, you would multiply this effect size by the correlation. Whereas if there was a change in brain size, you’d divide.
Conversely, if you thought Brain size was more directly selected, you would expect IQ to be less extreme, and thus you’d multiply any brain growth by the correlation. Is that correct? Or am I overthinking this?
“When?”
100 years ago. I’m talking about the Morton sample from the Desilva dataset.
Puppy is just making up the theory now to suit his preconceived notions of cold = smart (except south america and india). If the theory has so many holes in it, its time to dispose of it.
India’s average IQ is low (see Rushton)
https://vdare.com/articles/indians-aren-t-that-intelligent-on-average
South Americans were intelligent enough to create a civilization because they had exposure to the ice age before heading South
*other places had independent civilizations too* (none in Europe, by the way)
Oh they just had exposure to the cold too.
*Inuit living in cold for thousands of years. Don’t have the highest IQ*
Oh just population size.
When will PP give up on CWT and r/K selection? Rebecca Sear has demolished Lynn’s IQs, Rushton’s theory has been dead for 30 years. PP just lives in the past.
“Hereditarianism” is nothing more than a giant ad hoc hypothesis, explaining away anomalies while generating nothing new.
Given that IQ & civilization creation are imperfect measures of genetic intelligence, and where races live today is an imperfect measure of ancestral exposure to cold, it’s hardly surprising that one can cherry pick some exceptions that prove the rule. The same can be done with Allen’s Rule and Bergmann’s Rule but then you don’t believe in those either.
That’s such a ridiculous claim. Wicherts et al show why it’s ridiculous. What you’re saying is of course ad hoc bullshit. I said the same years ago, but now I know better. What do you know about the architecture and the overall knowledge base that the Maya accumulated over thousands of years? How is that congruent with your just-so story? Just because they were “exposed” to cold winters thousands of years previously has any bearing on the accomplishments of a completely different group of people? Yea, it’s ad hoc.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222545421_Evolution_brain_size_and_the_national_IQ_of_peoples_around_3000_years_BC
What you’re saying is of course ad hoc bullshit.
So is natural selection according to you so I’m in good company.
Yea, neither lead to predictions. ToNS doesn’t lead to any predictions as to which gene(s) is/are the cause of T. I’ve argued exhaustively that since the hereditarian hypothesis’ basis is both on neo-Darwinian assumptions, and a certain model of the gene, that it’s already bound to fail.
Rushton writing for a white nationalist rag like vdare. Speaking at AmRen. Speaking at the Preserving Western Civilization conference, wonder what his motivations were…
You’re not wrong about Rushton’s motives, but Jensen’s motives are beyond reproach.
Thinking that welfare policies will lead to “the genetic enslavement of a substantial segment of our population”, we can “estimate a person’s genetic standing on intelligence from his score on an IQ test” using heritability estimates (straight nonsense), and of course “the best thing the black community could do would be to limit the birth-rate among the least-able members, which of course is a eugenic proposal”.
Nevermind his ties to racists during the 60s and 70s, as John Jackson has considerably noted in his blogs and academic papers.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-86095-001
What do you have against eugenics? People practice it all the time when they choose a mate who has a good job or when they get tested for diseases before having kids.
One reason is that there is uncertainty, since genetics is probabilistic, not deterministic and of course genetic determinist/reductionist (read: hereditarianism) ideas will attempt to hold more value than social goings-on. It could lead to discrimination of people with diseases/traits now.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15168670/
At the end of the day, eugenics is wrong and shouldn’t make a comeback. Not even “through the backdoor.”
“Rushton writing for a white nationalist rag like vdare. Speaking at AmRen. Speaking at the Preserving Western Civilization conference, wonder what his motivations were…”
The truth sometimes has a nationalist and racist bias.
You know… the reason why dogs don’t have the same rights as humans.
They just don’t deserve them because of their innate qualities. 99.9% of us are human supremacists except the crazy animal-lovers.
Too bad Rushton wasn’t speaking “truth”—he peddled outdated and outright false racist bullshit for 30 years. His work before he became a disillusioned racist is pretty decent, but I doubt you know or care about it.
RR is so fucking stupid. So what if he wrote for Amren. Even if he wrote for Nazi motherfucker magazine it wouldn’t change whether it was true or not.
In fact you and Rushton have something in common…you both drill for oil.
Only people who think non human animals are absolutely inferior and then don’t deserve compassion are exactly like most non human animals think about themselves… that’s why these people tend to be dumb and or evil, useless since ever, even more useless now with so many urgent and big problems threatening all of us. It’s funny when these same subhumans talk about how morally superior your precious race is… people who are always in contradictions generally have reasoning and memory deficit. I actually think dogs deserve more rights than LOTS of SEPIENS (of all breeds) i see walking erect in the streets… specially that crazy santa jewsus believers.
I thought Rushton dug for gold, not drilled for oil?
Rushton was married to Elizabeth Weis and they did publish together (eg Rushton and Rushton, 2002), and she caused some controversy on Twitter last year with her views on the repatriation of indigenous skulls. But Rushton did have an illegitimate son with a black woman, as Ed Dutton notes in his great biography of Rushton (that’s like the only good thing I have to say abkht Dutton).
Philosopher do you even have a girlfriend.
it is better not to “transition” or commit suicide than to…
1. have chirren out of wedlock.
OR
2. have a gf of another race. gross. just as gross as professional nazi andrew anglin’s gf. just gross.
?
rr: i’m so autistic only a negress would let me do it with her…but i’m not even married and therefore i’m going to hell unless i repent.
mugabe: indeed!
it IS better to “transition” or commit suicide than to…
1. have chirren out of wedlock.
OR
2. have a gf (let alone a babymomma) of another race. gross. just as gross as professional nazi andrew anglin’s gf. just gross.
the pope: the only penance rr can do at this point is to cut his balls off. but given he’s addicted to steroids this won’t make any difference to his appearance with clothes on.
mugabe: HEAR! HEAR!
it’s SAD that rr thinks he has a girlfriend.
rr is a disillusioned racist.
he hates white people…
especially northern italians and non-albanian italians.
Do you still watch CNN?
No. What have I missed?
What’s funny is that CNN is about to be in control of a major Trump donor.
One of the largest myths that pervade American political discourse is the idea that the media is mainly controlled by the left wing.
Western media is ”libertarian”.
Not going to lie: I’ve been looking at data like this for over half my life now and it still bums me out every now and then. Oh well, life isn’t fair and I don’t plan on having any children (unrelated to race/eugenics reasons) so the results are basically entirely academic to me on an individual level.
I do want to add that if you take this at face value, the the pernicious effects of racism on a group’s success in society is very real despite right-wing hereditarians resistance to the idea ut we just focus on the wrong group.
Racism explains maybe 10% max of black failure.
Not going to lie, I’m shocked you would entertain the possibility of it having any effect at all.
PP I know you’re into horror films. Did you hear about these guys making a Winnie the Pooh horror film? The original Winnie the Pooh book is so old that it’s in the public domain, so they don’t need to get the trademark to legally make it.
Peeps love,
A friend of mine during his school days was packed a boiled egg ( or hard boiled egg in north american speak) in his lunch box every single day. He has a big head now and nobody among his ancestors has a big head. Do you think consumption of boiled eggs every day led to him developing a big head than others. Eggs have high choline that helps in growth of white matter in the brain as far as I know.
Answer me peeps otherwise I am going to tell everyone what your ethnicity is, I figured it out…
You always ask these really dumb questions. I think you are delayed intellectually.
You should have been fed an egg everyday growing up.
I was in the gym near a massive hulk [n word redacted by pp, Feb 8, 2023] once. The guy looked like something out of a lord of the rings movie. Anyways the girls in the gym seemed to really like him. Girls kind of like the orc look I think.
I would say you can be really ugly but if youre tall and muscly, you will still get a lot of women.
In the lord of the rings, the orcs side with Sauron who is basically the epitome of evil. The orcs themselves millenia ago were once elves who were mutilated and selectively bred for muscle mass and violent personalities.
Its a very interesting story in my opinion that kind of relates to HBD.
I was never into it because I had Rushton. Rushton was my Lord of the Rings.
Hayao Miyazaki doesn’t like LotR because it glorifies violence and also because he said the orcs/Uruk Hai represented Asians or other groups besides whites. Which may be partially true, but they basically represent low IQ or “r-selected” cannibalistic barbarians that always threaten to destroy civilization if given the chance. Or simply that impulse within every human/organism.
I think Hayao Miyazaki is just being a whiny commie who has a chip on his shoulder about being Asian and them not producing nearly the amount and importance in art, culture, and progressive civilizational accomplishments.
JRR Tolkien might have been HBD aware. In the 1920s and 30s eugenics and race science were popular science topics. People read books about it. It wouldn’t surprise me at all.
In Harry Potter there are high IQ creatures called goblins that run the banking system in the wizarding world…
A lot of drama going on on social media about Hogwarts Legacy.
Don’t really mind that I’m giving JKR money. I mean, some racist people work at whole foods, but I’m still going to shop there, even if it directly puts money in their pocket.
Nah, what I’m really pissed about is how poorly optimized it is for ray tracing. The game looks gorgeous with the reflections, shadows, and ambient occlusion, but I can’t enjoy any of that once a cut scene starts. There is no way my 3070 is already obsolete. I’ve heard it may have something to do with Denuvo, but we’ll see once the day 1 patch drops.
IQ is just dividing things into parts.
organized causality.
arranging things meaningfully.
steps goals subgoals.
breaking it down and building it up.
dealing with many pieces
This would be objective, no bell curves or anything.
the mugabe and the chomsk agree…i just found this yesterday.
cue to 28:55 for the HARD CORE RIDICULE OF RR AND ANAL PHILOSOPHY.
Chomsky cannot feel his own heartbeat.
Neither do I but did he even read Jung?
Consciousness is flow – it is energy in a medium.
the background space of the universe there being would be one unified whole.
all energy would be felt by the being of total reality.
like we feel the energy in us.
peepee: you’ve always been good to the cat-person personality.
do you like my dog?
soary…27: 55.
sadly…
LOL.
RR says this person and Aristotle have the same intelligence.
if rr’s babymomma looks like alicia keys then we should give him a party!
BUT alicia keys is half italian…unlike rr…
this is albanian ENVY!
inter-racial sex is like sex outside marriage or contraception…
UN-Cynical.
and therefore…
EVIL.
and alicia keys went back on the ranch…
she married a man who was half and half and smart and 6’+ tall.
all love is narcissism.
all sex is masturbation.
OBVIOUSLY.
All love/sex is narcissism/masturbation for YOU because you have an erotic identity disorder, probably caused by the same genetic mutation that caused your high GRE and bad social judgement. There is nothing sexier than yourself because you have a sexual target error; sexual attraction turned inward.
A much rarer erotic identity disorder is the sexually-motivated desire to become an amputee. A subset of men are erotically driven to have particular limbs amputated (usually, but not always, one of their legs). These men often admit sexual fantasies about being amputees, and tellingly, they are usually very attracted to amputees—just as autogynephiles (who want to be women) are usually very attracted to women. This erotic identity disorder (technical name: apotemnophilia) is much rarer than autogynephilia, presumably because attraction to amputees is much rarer than attraction to women. Apotemnophilia is an erotic identity disorder because sexual desire for amputees has been inverted to the self, causing a sexual desire for oneself as an amputee.
https://www.science20.com/j_michael_bailey/was_michael_jackson_pedophile
i confused “charles nelson reilly” with “paul lynde”.
it’s almost as if…
animals don’t have minds…
VEGEMITE SANDWICH!
my dog is sick and tired of rr.
cats are impressed by your love of them. but they hate you.
dogs actually love you.
Even cats can’t escape from your autism. Jeez
pissing people off that have your best interests in mind is a mental illness.
rr cannot imagine that intelligence is more than memorizing arguments.
what he calls expertise is not the same as being able to hold multiple relationships in one’s mind at once.
does he think drawing is not an objective measure of this?
yes.
I would like to see really interesting arguments that complexize this IQ debate but again disappointed not just by the IQists but also by anti-IQcists…
they dont hate you. they just have a different ‘love language’ (i find this word corny….cant believe i am speaking this) than dogs have.
Cats are more likely to share their food with you than dogs are, but are also more likely to abandon you if your house burns down or something, than dogs.
the HUNGER…
i know from black + white…but i can’t say…or peepee would just make fun of me forever.
the reason for the suffering in this world is because the persons to inhabit this world at this very time are shy to admit that having many personas is wrong.
rr: but kevin bird said in the Journal of Retardation Studies…
mugabe: STFU and just watch pornhub.
rr: but that’ll make me gay.
mugabe: sad.
Peeps,
Not related to the article or to each other :
1) Which ethnicity (not race) do you think is the greatest?
2) Why do you think black people have/evolved prognathism and curly hair? I think because they evolved in rainforests which have small berry fruits/ tubers? more prevalent than larger fruits and evolved curly hair to prevent sweat being retained on the scalp/in the hair on the head? What do you think?
3) Why arent you talking to me properly? Is it because i spoke bad against isl*m and m*slims? I ask this because i noticed you speaking less to me after my those comments.