[Note from PP, Nov 14, 2020: The following is a guest post by commenter “illuminaticatblog” and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pumpkin Person]
I have several problems at once. Autism, psychosis, emotional neglect. They all mash up into some schizoid temperament. The reason I act the way I do is that I am trying to keep stable from all this chaos I need under control.
autists are literalists, they take in what everything is as-is.
schizos read into noise things that are not there.
schizos see intentions/hidden meanings in it all
Schizoids take the hidden meaning literally not personally. They analyze it rather than believe it. They do not think the psychosis is real. That is the difference between the schizoid and schizophrenic. Analysis is not the same as logic. Logic alone does not evaluate in order to organize. This is the difference between the schizoid and the autist.
Schizoids do not have conspiracies (synthesis). Analysis categorizes the psychosis patterns. Schizoids have emotional problems. The reason for the analysis is to keep emotionally stable. Instead of or acting out emotionally. Prolonged emotional stress, obsession, trauma lead to complexes. Groups of associations related to a core issue. This happens randomly so in schizophrenics hidden meanings get caught up in the emotions one relates to complexes. Random connections ensue. Schizoids have the least random complexes because they put all emotion into mental organization.
I try not to act on my emotions. I analyze things a huge amount. What makes me different yet the same as a schizoid is that I rationalize more but much less than neurotypicals. Full-blown schizoids rationalize the least of any mental condition but to do this they must suppress emotional attachment to anything irrational. Not emotion itself but what science and philosophy say is irrational. That means rationalizations need emotional temperance instead of embracing them.
I guess that I still rationalize things but have my psychosis almost under control. The random noise seems to have meaning but I am not creating anything from it I am categorizing from it. Simply does this meaning reflect what is actually in reality? What are all the options?
In my magic practices. I’ve seen what happens because of intention. I controlled the hallucinations like in a lucid dream. I accepted the messages that I let guide me. I did what they told me. I wrote it all down and accepted the contract. Then the hallucinations happened. I’ve tried this several times. And it worked twice. This could be considered schizophrenic because it was an episode but this can be induced in non-schizophrenics. Schizos because they see the messages or feel them get them everywhere all the time like being watched. I tapped into that.
It is important to watch your emotions carefully. Like posture, you need to keep them perfectly aligned and not sit down too much. Slouched emotions are not good. This will help with psychosis. And thinking through things.
Pumpkin Person 
Thanks for the article illuminaticat. Here is a fun personality test you’ll like:
(dunno if you’ve watched Rick and Morty)
https://www.idrlabs.com/rick-and-morty-pathology/test.php
Bet you’ll score highest in the Birdman category.
those yuge piles were for the progress.
that is, they had economic/political purposes, purposes other than consumption and conspicuous consumption.
Take care about overdiagnosis. Rationalize means you are trying instead analysing things objectively making sense about your personal opinions pretending they are perfect reflection of non subjective reality. Like the covidmorons trying to rationalize their wrong beliefs about covid-19. But of course absolute objective analysis is nearly impossible specially about personal like stuff.
the west is taking all the south asian geniuses…and some of its retards (LOADED).
won’t this make south asian poorer than it would have been?
Ok sure thing Ron Perlman.
Try this, illuminati. I’ve found it pretty helpful.
Depression is often described as a complex multi-faceted syndrome with no single cause and no simple treatment. If I am correct (and I must admit that this is a very big if), then this sort of statement is just wrong. I am claiming that depression does have a single, fairly simple, root cause. The only real difficulty in solving the problem is that the process of slipping into the state where you are not deciding things is an unconscious process. It is hard to stop it by an act of will or out of understanding because you just don’t notice it when it happens. That’s why, I believe, depression is a hard problem to fix with talk therapy. You can have lots of realizations and insights about yourself, but understanding why you have a particular set of dysfunctional thoughts and feelings is not really the point. The point is to not have thoughts and feelings in general in an uncontrolled unconscious manner. At some point, then, it occurred to me that directly training my unconscious might be an interesting try. I am not an expert on depression, but, after all, it is happening in my own head and who knows more about what’s happening in my own head than I do? I will now describe what I did and predict what will happen to you if you follow along.
THE RULES OF SNAP CLUB
This game is simple and fun and easy to do. I am rashly claiming that it will fix your depression. It’s easy enough to try.
The rules are as follows:
1. DO ANYTHING YOU WANT ANYTIME YOU WANT.
I think that you will agree that Rule #1 is easy to follow. For example, if you are feeling terrible and you just want to lie in bed all weekend, go ahead and do that. You are still obeying Rule #1.
2. IF YOU DECIDE TO DO SOMETHING, JUST AT THE MOMENT WHEN YOU DECIDE, SNAP YOUR FINGERS.
A word about Rule #2. I don’t mean that you should decide to do something in the future like “I’m going to exercise more.” I am talking about deciding to do something immediately before you physically do it. For instance, if you are sitting, you might or might not decide to stand up at some point. If you decide to stand up, at the moment when you actually decide to stand up, SNAP YOUR FINGERS and then stand up. Notice that no will power is involved. If you don’t feel like standing up, then don’t. But, by definition, the SNAP will immediately precede an action on your part because I’m telling you to just wait until you’re about to do it and then SNAP at that moment. Suppose, for example, that you are feeling terrible as described above. No matter how terrible you are feeling, you will occasionally turn your head, roll over, go to the bathroom to pee or do something. To play the game, you just have to precede turning your head with a decision to turn your head and SNAP just before you turn your head. You are then obeying Rule #1 and Rule #2.
https://psychcentralforums.com/depression-success-stories/361192-how-i-understood-then-escaped.html
“Schizoids take the hidden meaning literally not personally. They analyze it rather than believe it. They do not think the psychosis is real. That is the difference between the schizoid and schizophrenic.”
I’ve read that intelligence seems to be protective against psychosis, lowering the chance of decompensation from “premorbidly psychotic” disorders to actual psychosis. That’s probably because, inter alia, higher intelligence increases your ability to rationally explain the noise in the signal, which the overactive psychotic mind is so eager to find. “Paranoia” is etymologically derived from “beyond mind,” so it describes a condition in which the mind detects patterns beyond those present. If psychosis, then, metaphorically opens the floodgates for information into the mind, then higher intelligence acts like a sanitation filter with higher capacity. In a neurotypical person, their cognitive style serves as a dam, a priori preventing paranoid patterns from entering their mind.
Cognitive control is correlated with intelligence and with better management of long term psychotic disease.
There are two types of correlation and of course causality
Paralel and intersectional
Paralel correlation example: ice cream comsuption per capita and human development index
Intersectional correlation example: sexually transmitted infections rates and non-heterossexuality
Causality example: a very selfish and insensible people is very likely to exhibit anti social behaviors
In the first no there any significant relation between the variables. In the second there is a significant relation without any cause & effect one like “if i’m gay then i Will contract STI anyway because i’m gay”.
In the late the prevalence, constancy or expressive stability of certain category of characteristics It’s a major reason or cause for related behavioral outcomes.
Cognitive control is the adaptativeness. PP think adapt in human context is become a billionaire. But adaptativeness is your capacity to resist or thrive whatever the environment you are. Some people call it resiliency ability. Others call it grit (I suppose). Adapt is not just or exactly try to emulate (mostly imposed) underlying and explicit laws of your environments but first of all to adapt based on what you have, what god gave to you. Because IQdiocy cult many Interesting and important facets of human intelligence has been overlooked. A homeless person can be very well adapted to her deprived environment. There are many ways to adapt. Indeed no other way to analyse human intelligence than in natura being constantly tested.
Its crazy to know Im the most neurotypical person on this blog. And anyone who denies that is throwing themselves into a pit of fire radiated by dishonesty.
Neurotypical = avg Joey
Santo it sounds like you have twelve cocks stuffed in your mouth every time you open it. Shut the fuck up and be humbled you idiot.
What RR believes
https://mobile.twitter.com/Abebab/status/1311589200773480449
Is scientology really less of a fraud than, say, ultra-orthodox Judaism? Both are super weird.
Funny how you’re only allowed to criticize one of them, though.
*more
I’m a fucking retard.
Religion, baby
KitCat,
IluminattiCat
Do you have this???
My thoughts are not scattered they are blocked. It is like stuttering. My brain just stops. I am not incoherent. I just stop. I have to get back to where I was. It takes time. I do not know what to say so I stop and lock up waiting to get my thoughts out. This is to do with my thinking. I can’t think and it is frustrating. Nothing to do with communicating. I communicate fine. Thought block is different from scattered thoughts.
AI only has an IQ of around 50. From my knowledge AI has a very deep and extensive amount of knowledge or information readily available to it but I assume the fifty IQ score comes from its fluid intelligence and ability to integrate the information and then solve problems using the generalized pieces of information it comes across.
Very interesting.