Scientists use the term Behavioral Modernity to describe a suite of sophisticated traits thought to have evolved around 50,000 years ago, marking the start of the Upper Paleolithic. For example Richard Klein noted that before 50,000 years ago, virtually everyone made artifacts out of stone, while after 50,000 years ago, folks suddenly started using bone, ivory, antler or shell. He cited this fact, among many others, as evidence of a genetic increase in intelligence that occurred in our species.
If using diverse materials to make artifacts is evidence of more intellect among cavemen, perhaps using diverse weapons to kill people is evidence of more intellect among slashers. In honor of Halloween, I decided to see how some of our favorite fictional slasher villains would stack up.
Jason

In Friday the 13th part II (1981) (the first film that features Jason as a slasher), Jason kills 8 people with 6 weapons (ice pick, barbed wire, hammer claw, machete, spear, and butcher knife). That’s a ratio of 6/8 or 0.75.
Michael Myers

In the original Halloween (1978), adult Myers kills 4 people (and two dogs) with at least 3 weapons (knife & phone chord): Score 2/4 = 0.5
Pam

She kills 8 people with 5 weapons (hunting knife, arrow, bow and arrow, machete, and axe). Score 5/8 = 0.63
Billy

In Silent Night Deadly Night (1983), he kills 8 people with 6 weapons (Christmas lights, knife, hammer, bow and arrow, deer horns, axe). Score 6/8 = 0.75.
Leatherface

In the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) he kills 4 people with 3 weapons (hammer, hook and saw). Score 3/4 = 0.75
Distribution of scores
Mean Behavioral Modernity Quotient = 0.68 (Standard Deviation = 0.1)
On a scale where British people average IQ 100 (standard deviation = 15), the criminally insane probably average about 76 (SD = 15?).
By equating the Behavioral Modernity mean and SD of the slashers (0.68 and 0.1) to the criminally insane IQ mean and SD (76 and 15), we get the following rough measures of non-verbal IQ:
Jason = IQ 87
Michael Myers = IQ 49
Pam = IQ 69
Billy = IQ 87
Leatherface = IQ 87
These numbers don’t seem to correlate at all with the intelligence of these characters. But a low correlation is to be expected given the small and fictional nature of the sample. More research on large data-sets of real life serial killers might give better results.
PP, Dont you have anything better to write about? 😦
A tip. Do an interview every month with one of your commentators.
Of course not. Pumpkin doesn’t care anymore.
If he did he would have actually listened the first ten thousand times I’ve corrected him on his datings for behavioral modernity.
He thinks bone tools have only been around for 50ky. That’s just disappointing.
I said before 50 kya virtually everyone made artifacts out of stone, so I acknowledge a few exceptions
Why are you criticising Puppy??? Are you insane?
Yes but it’s Halloween season so this is appropriate
Ev psycho is becoming more and more dumber
https://mobile.twitter.com/Mental_Elf/status/974663310904786944
Behavioral
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54748453
Hey Pumpkin, what can you refer me to, or link me with describing the correlation between brain size, head circumference and IQ? Have you written on this topic.
Thx
https://pumpkinperson.com/2019/01/04/what-is-the-correlation-between-iq-and-brain-size-and-how-causal-is-it/
lion’s latest post is ridiculous.
1. the only currently existing sytemic racism in the US is against whites. (but past racism has an effect today.)
2. his version of HBD is like a stick figure compared to a caravaggio.
HBDers make the same mistake over and over and over again. they assume that the current situation in a particular place is the situation everywhere and at all times.
at least dershowitz offerred the explanation for ashkenzi IQ as…all the smart european gentile males became priests and thus had no chirrens. during the industrial revolution the population of britain quintupled. could that have been dysgenic?
look at how northern europeans were 2,000 years ago and today how they look down on southern europeans.
[redacted by pp, nov 3, 2020]
then “success” isn’t one thing. jews are conspicuous in some fields and not in others. and i don’t mean sports. jewish “genius” has a “profile”. it’s the same with china people and very high VIQ…basically no china people.
as with sprinting and black dominance one might propose that games are the area with the lowest barriers to entry where talent + hard work pays off most reliably, and…
jews have done very well at chess. other games idk. i’ve heard whites still dominate certain types of video games.