Earlier this month, the literary world was rocked by the death of Toni Morrison. She was 88. In 1993 Morrison won the Nobel Prize in literature, making her arguably the most academically accomplished African American of all time; certainly of her generation.
Morrison was part of the Silent Generation, one of the 58 million Americans born from 1925 to 1945. As much as 16% of this generation was black (9.28 million).
Today the correlation between IQ and academic success is only about 0.55, but in the mid-20th century, when Morrison was coming of age, it was a potent 0.7 and was likely about the same in the black population.
It was once suggested by Garth Zeitzman that when estimating IQ from the 0.7 correlation between IQ and academic achievement, the academic Nobel Prize is the pinnacle of the latter.
Thus if there were a perfect correlation between IQ and academic success, Morrison’s IQ would be 78 points above the black mean (one in 9.28 million), but given a correlation of 0.7 in Morrison’s day, we’d expect:
Morrison’s IQ = (0.7)78 + U.S. black mean
Morrison’s IQ = 55 + 85
Morrison’s IQ = 140 ( 95% confidence interval 119 to 161)
Further evidence of Morrison having a 140 IQ is her schooling a BBC reporter on the difference between a porch and a terrace, the fact that she has a very good long-term memory for her childhood (according to Fran Lebowitz), the fact that she excelled at typing when young, and like her biggest fan Oprah, she learned to read by age three.
Indeed Oprah was such a huge fan that she chose not one, not two, but four Morrison books for her coveted book club, and loved Beloved so much she bought the movie rights.
Winner of the Pulitzer Prize in fiction, Beloved is based on the true story of Margaret Garner, an escaped 19th century slave who loved her baby so much, she killed it rather than allow it to live a life of slavery. In Morrison’s brilliant vision, once slavery is over, the baby returns as a flesh and blood ghost to live with her now free mother (played by Oprah in the movie).
It’s a testament to Morrison’s high IQ writing style that Beloved is considered way too difficult for university undergads, and Oprah was warned by director Jodie Foster that it was way too literary a novel to ever become a film.
Nonetheless, it became arguably the most underrated film of all time.
I’ve never read the book, but I loved the film for its sheer beauty, originality, haunting score, and how the simplicity of the 19th century characters captured the Flynn effect, especially the mesmerizing scene of the escaped slave men clumsily dancing to Baby Sugg’s preaching.
Or the white girl Amy Denver who dreams of going to Boston to buy “the pertiest velvet”.
There was a childlike innocence about the characters that revealed the Flynn effect, juxtaposed against the stunning beauty of pre-industrialized America with its vast wilderness, traveled by horse and canoe.
Sadly, despite being promoted by Oprah and directed by Jonathan Demme, the film flopped at the box office, perhaps because the average moviegoer is too low in IQ and too high in psychopathy to appreciate such emotional non-linear symbolism.
Morrison’s first book was The Bluest Eye, inspired by a beautiful little black girl Morrison knew as a child. The girl became an atheist after her years of praying for blue eyes went unanswered. So powerful was racism that this girl would rather look like a freak than accept her natural black beauty.
Like a lot of black Americans who were raised in segregated times, there was an anger lurking beneath Morrison’s soft-spoken eloquence.
In one book she imagined a U.S. town without white folks.
“What would it be like if they just weren’t there?” Morrison asked.
The title of the book: Paradise.
When a white interviewer asked Morrison why she didn’t include more white characters, she reacted with a calm yet defensive rage.
Despite the fact that Morrison was a Nobel Prize winning literary giant who exudes gravitas with every breath, there’s something about the white woman’s smug gaze that made even Morrison look small.
A character in the film Beloved said it best, when describing a white man riding a horse:
There’s a look that white folks get. Righteous look…
To learn more about this American legend, I strongly recomend the following BBC documentary:
Pumpkin Person 
LOW!
“Beloved is considered way too difficult for university undergads”
Says who?
“but I loved the film for its sheer beauty, originality, haunting score, and how the simplicity of the 19th century characters captured the Flynn effect”
What do you actually know about good film making?
Beloved is considered way too difficult for university undergads at indian universities, which are like pre-school in developed countries. it’s the first time indians learn not to shit in the street.
sad.
If only trump was smart enough to do something about this.
you don’t get the joke.
paki = indian = south asian…the rest of the world doesn’t care.
a spanish actor playing a south asian.
Says who?
Can’t find the original source where I read that, but I found a cool web page that ranks books by their difficulty. Beloved gets a 9 out of 10 in toughness.
As for film making, I always thought I’d be a great director but I’m sure a lot of people think that and turn out to be wrong.
I got a buddy who’s a pretty good amateur actor/director/writer
Ima ask him if he’s seen this movie
Oh boo fucking hoo. Leave it to a dumb nigress to bitch. There was nothing wrong segregation. in fact , under segregation blacks were less overepresented in crime and their families were more in tact. Negroes like her serve as useful pawns to be used by the Jews to destroy white society.
I read Bluest Eye as a high school junior. I liked it a lot, and I think it’d hold up if I read it now. She was obviously very talented.
Judging by her appearance on Colbert, it looks like her attitudes hadn’t evolved much since the 1960s. Sort of a shame.
It’s too bad when intelligent people are intellectually dishonest.
“It’s too bad when intelligent people are intellectually dishonest.”
Weird. That’s how I feel about you.
Sure you’re not mistaking me for someone else?
I am. My bad dude
no biggie
I don’t fault her for denying race exists. Scientists can’t even agree on what a species is or how many species are in the genus homo, so can we expect non-scientists to know if race (a much more subtle distinction) is meaningful.
Race is a subjective biological demarcation. Species isn’t far off.
I was faulting her for saying that whites have a “serious problem” with racism. That interview was probably 25 years ago, but I doubt her position has changed much.
Racism has been an extreme minority position amongst whites for at least 30 years.
Organisms are members of their own species if they can produce fertile offspring. I’ve read that as a general rule, a breeding group can be classified as its own subspecies if one can differentiate between its members and their cousins with a 90+% success rate. Races are arbitrarily categorized, but I think that it’s fair to consider East Asians and Africans as belonging to their own subspecies, as you can sort them with 100% accuracy.
This whole post is ludicrous. Calculating IQs from mainstream Jewish bullshit then telling us its “intellectual” get the fuck out of here with your Redacted by pp, sept 11, 2019]bullshit.
but i assume she was NOT talented at all. she just wrote “white man bad! white man bad!” over and over and was rewarded for it.
all nobel prizes are political, but the literature prize is the most politcal.
i expect all new world black authors just write about “racism” and the african ones just write about how all africa’s problems are from colonialism.
they’re just pawns of the mongolians and virtue signalling europeans.
affirmative action makes all black accomplishments suspect.
affirmative action only makes black > white achievement suspect, not black > other black & no other U.S. black has won an academic nobel prize
they’re just pawns of the mongolians and virtue signalling europeans
She’s not nessecarily a pawn if she’s helping herself & her people in the process. The virtue signaling Europeans are arguably the true pawns because they’re participating in their own genocide (though part of virtue signaling is self-sacrifice)
When blacks are pro-white they’re seen as pawns by the black left. When they’re anti-white they’re seen as pawns by the alt-right. The first view might have been true 40 years ago. The second view confuses a pawn with a partner.
Blacks are not ‘partners’ with jews. Definitely not seen by then as equal. Look at how jews treat blacks in Israel.
Israel & being seen as equal are not the point. They’re two groups that limplicitly united in the U.S. to defeat a common rival. It’s a mutually beneficial relationship, though the higher IQ group always benefits a lot more on average
Most average blacks have no idea how much jews fund and organise their ‘civil rights’ causes. Blacks are unwitting pawns most of the time.
You don’t get it. If you’re a pawn for someone who is advancing your interests, then you’re not a pawn, you’re just an unwitting beneficiary of mutually beneficial activism.
It’s only those who are tricked into fighting someone else’s battle (like most Americans who want to attack Iran or were pro-Iraq war) that are pawns, but the civil rights movement is a black movement (even if jews pushed & benefited from it too)
Now you could say the blacks that push for immigration are pawns, since that’s something that likely harms black interests
Puppy, if jews didn’t exist there would be no civil rights movement and certainly anything as politically potent. Therefore blacks are pawns. It doesn’t matter if you think they benefit. Jews are promoting them for very peculiar and narrow reasons.
You’re being too literal & missing the spirit of the word. Pawn implies I benefit at your expense, not just that I benefit. There’s a subtle distinction you’re missing. If we both benefit you’re not my pawn, you’re my less powerful teammate.
It’s like when a billionaire invests in a small business & increases its value. The small business owner is not a pawn if he makes more money too.
and this is true even of apartheid south africa. the ANC and mandela were a (((front))).
i don’t know about zim. ZANU-PF may have been funded and supplied by the soviets.
while “pawns” might be too derisive [redacted by pp, aug 26, 2019], it’s more fair than “partners.”
people like to make a big deal out of MLK being spied on by the FBI. but it’s also true he was supported by the CIA via the Ford Foundation. malcolm x wasn’t, and so had to be destroyed.
blacks don’t have much power themselves. their political success is patronage.
Blacks don’t have much power but no group has increased their power as rapidly as blacks & ashkenazi Jews. You’re just bitter because they’re using power to take away yours. That’s why you guys call them pawns
What power do blacks have PP?
The last president was black dipshit.
I meant what power do blacks have now dipshit?
They have power in entertainment dipshit.
Rap is the most popular music genre.Blacks also dominate the most popular sports.
obama had no power dipshit. rap and all entertainment is controlled by mongolians. and blacks are a small minority of team owners, coaches, and managers. blacks have zero power. if they think they do, like peepee, they never will have any power.
Obama had the power to stop a war with Iran & get health passed. Oprah had the power to decide a close election. Blacks are dramatically underrepresented among thought leaders and billionaires, but they’re over-represented in pop-culture. They’re nowhere near as powerful as Jews or even whites overall, but they’re a lot more powerful than Native Americans. Powerful enough to get affirmative action (with the help of Jews and liberal whites of course) and wield moral authority.
No jews have power in entertainment, not blacks. Jews are the reason blacks are in entertainment moron.
It doesn’t matter pill. The very fact that Jews need blacks to have power gives blacks some modest degree of power. Far more power than they’ve had in any other time or place. It doesn’t matter why they’re in entertainment. Anyone with a platform to reach millions of people has power and as long as they don’t use their power to undermine Jewish power, they get to keep their platform as long as they stay profitable.
Queer melo, that is not power dipshit.
Queer name,
If you have influence you have power. What dumb and dumber don’t get is that it’s not jews with the influence. The young generation isn’t looking up to jews, they look up to black athletes and entertainment stars. If jews could do that themselves they wouldn’t “use” blacks.
Queer melo, that is not power. Lata mangeshkar is the most popular singer in India, it doesn’t mean she is the most powerful.
[redacted by pp, aug 26, 2019] There are a lot of normal people who would fin Morrison super boring or even pretentious.
Then there are high IQ people that see her as a magic negro.
[redacted by pp, aug 26, 2019]
I get that but I still think there’d be a positive correlation between IQ & liking morrison’s book, at least if you control for race. If you don’t control for race the correlation might be negative since her biggest fans are likely black
You really are stupid aren’t you. “Positive IQ and liking her book”
You are fucking retarded.
Puppy. I have a question. Do you actually read this stuff or are you just praising this author to ‘be a good little liberal’?
I’ve never read any of her books.
But I loved the film adaptation of Beloved for reasons I explained in the article & I loved the original cover art for The Bluest Eye
i guarantee disproportionately more whites have read morrison than blacks.
[redacted by pp, aug 26, 2019]
mongolians exploit whites’ altruism.
https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2019/08/22/the-japanification-of-bond-markets
Interest rates are at historical lows everywhere because the wealth distribution is at historical inequalities everywhere. Its not rocket science. Only politics and Master stop journalists and so on from making the casual inference in the media.
inequality is only part of it.
the rest of the developed world has followed japan’s lead. has japan become more unequal since 1990?
what has happened is labor forces have peaked. what the mechanism is exactly i don’t know but working age population peaked in 2000 in japan.
Also, we’re nowhere near productive capacity (especially in the 3rd world), which prevents inflation by keeping materials and manufacturing costs super low.
Actually the problem in Japan isn’t inequality per se. Its that most of the economic surplus is going to corporations which buy tons of japanese treasuries or other low yielding investments. Basically the corporations are hoarding resources and the political class is similar enough to the corporate class.
Pizzagate is really suspicious. I think its a paedo ring. I’m quite certain of it. The only factor against is that the emails also mention that women are involved and as we know, women are rarely paedophiles.
Why would top level people in politics do these acts in such a publicity prone industry? Maybe because the media is totally controlled by said people.
patrick byrne says he and others were subject to “political espionage” for the sake of…
drum roll…
blackmail.
he hasn’t named X and Y, just Z = comey.
so maybe buffett is now hip to mongolia.
I read the Bluest Eye in high school – maybe 10th grade. I never understood, emotionally, where the inferiority complex came from. It’s the same issue black people have with their need to define “light-skin” and “dark-skin.” But because I lack that tribal disposition, and would have likely been the House Negro, even I as a kid just scoffed at the nonsense.
Also, she talks about race – her books are about race – and she has the gall to feel insulted by being questioned why she has no inclusive resolution to her message (having more white characters, presumably in a positive, conciliatory light). Whereas white people don’t bleat about race in that way – it’s not something they toil over, which could be a valid criticism. That white woman deserved to be smug, because at the end of the day, it’s all just whining.
but the aufhebung is NOT “diversity”.
even a 100% UN-racist society with whites and blacks…
black people would write about race and nothing else.
My belief is that the deep state in its present form is more or less headed by the Council on Foreign Relations. But within the spy agencies you might get rogue elements, where unscrupulous people use the amazing tools given to them to blackmail rich people or whatnot. I also think Mossad are a key actor. I’m more than 90% certain the supercomputer the NSA have to monitor everything is doing it on behalf of the true ‘rulers’ of the US and not President Trump.
[redacted by pp, aug 26, 2019]
The people that truly run the West use politicians as a front or in many cases like Unz said, have blackmailed them to be almost like prisoners of their public offices. This is why closet homosexuals like Marco Rubio or Cory Booker always get pushed into the mainstream as people with clean records and no skeletons in the closet could go rogue.
I am pretty sure a lot of these people are ashkenazi jewish. But there might be remnants of the 400 left like the rockefeller clan who direct things alongside the people at the ((CFR)).
yes. what unz said was…
…it’s not that politicians (and other formally powerful people) are blackmailed…
it’s that blackmail-able people are promoted to positions of formal power.
byrne was a member of the CFR iirc.
I think my description above is a really good guess for someone that isn’t even american. I bet I’d get a B or better. Its a pity a Deep State person isn’t around to confirm it. I guess its one of those tests where the answer is always changing anyways.
There was definitely a divide in the Deep State over Trump. Namely, there really is a faction that don’t like Trump and wanted to kill two birds with 1 stone by throwing the Russia crap at him.
And then the faction or coalition of interests that supported trump….which I nothing about much.
two birds?
putin is pure evil, but russia has never been a threat beyond its nukes.
Melos little mind will explode now after reading all this.
I’m pretty sure most people including myself have become desensitized to your stupidity.
I think the funniest part about all of this is dumb and dumber truly believe they make profound and factual statements. So here I am still waiting, as usual.
PP should try to debate Taleb.
I’m also kind of interested in what pumpkin would think of that
Taleb provided so few details that his results are meaningless. Those who have provided more details give very different results:
https://humanvarieties.org/2016/01/31/iq-and-permanent-income-sizing-up-the-iq-paradox/
http://www.jsmp.dk/posts/2019-06-16-talebiq/
Hey pumpkin how do I post images where The actual picture shows up instead of just a link to it?
By deleting the part of the link after jpg or png iirc
Thanks bruh I’ll test it out later.
So did Trump really say the US should try nuking a hurricane to stop it? Young Turks suggests he got the idea from the movie Sharknado which he was supposed to appear in one of the sequels but pulled out when he ran for president.
If its true Trump really is too incompetent to be in office, as much as I agree with him on borders and trade.
Similarly when Trump hired that private detective to investigate Obamas birth cert – was he for real? I always thought it was just a savvy political move to stake a hard right position with the base.
On the other hand Trump is right about some conspiracy theories namely the fact that Obama really did wiretap his phones and that the whole Russia thing is fake news.
Epstein left a will worth $577m. Considering he was once dubbed a billionaire, I assume he must have spent quite a lot on legal costs over the years following his first indictment. Did he leave it to Mossad? It wouldn’t surprise me at all that Mossad had charitable status in the US.
Once again Forbes is right & our little dumb dumb was wrong:
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/noahkirsch/2019/07/08/why-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-is-not-a-billionaire/amp/
lion’s been getting his low IQ autism on.
https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/if-super-high-iq-people-are-so-smart-why-cant-they/
https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2019/08/26/the-inappropriately-excluded/
the headline claim may be true. idk. but the guys explaining why they’re true, lion and ferguson demonstrate themselves to be LOW IQ AUTISTS.
nerd/autist vs genuinely smart person is revealed in sport.
there was a half white, half filipino in college who asked me to play chess and then ping-pong because gay crush on me…”i played ping pong for the school” he said.
i beat him at both over and over again.
it was sad.
and he was tall and robust…unlike melo.
double sad.
Pure East Asians would MASSACRE you at ping pong. It would be a blood bath I would pay to see
Puppy do they have ping pong in North Korea?
Eh. I would dominate all of my East Asian friends when it came to reaction time and hand eye coordination. I blame video games.
and he was tall and robust
In other words it was you who had a crush on him
Yeah that was kinda gay, wasnt it😂
“sport.”
“chess and then ping-pong “
Hahahaha.
He finally admits that he’s dumber than most blacks.
THE WORLD’S TOP RANKED TABLE TENNIS PLAYER IN 2018 IS NOT…
A ‘GINA PERSON!
SAD!
can you imagine how INFERIOR and small brained ‘gina people would have to be NOT to monopolize the top 10 or top 25…considering no one else gives a shit about ping pong?
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
Non-asians don’t care about ping pong because they genetically suck at it.
65% of the best players are Asian including #1:
https://pumpkinperson.com/2019/02/02/physical-speed-vs-mental-speed/
the very fact that negroes can play ping pong at a top 20 level means the models used by psycholgists are VERY VERY NOT RIGHT.
NOT EVEN APPROXIMATELY CORRECT.
There are no blacks in the top 20:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Table_Tennis_Federation
my favorite “luck” song:
highest ranking #18. current #23.
in january 2018 the highest ranked male player was a europoid.
try again peepee-tard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadri_Aruna
it’s also obvious that tall people and people with long legs are at a disadvantage.
it’s not about reaction time.
so an andaman pygmy could be trained to win the gold medal in ping pong.
just-so stories. Others argue height’s an advantage:
At 6-1, his height gives him more leverage for acceleration, thus his more powerful shots. Many call his forehand as one of the most powerful in the sport.
hundreds of people have made the top 20 at one point or another, but the 10 best of all time are 80% East Asian and 0% black
https://sport.one/the-top-10-greatest-male-table-tennis-players/
test
https://ibb.co/kKhjwYP
Wait a minute, did you post something Naruto related? Would not expect to see that here of all places LOL
Lol ya it’s the akatsuki reacting to something. I was a huge naruto fan growing up. Hate the shit now.
Well since my shit won’t go though id appreciate it if pumpkin would guide me step by step on how to post pictures. This shit is retarded
go to bing.com. do a bing image search of whatever you want a picture of. Click on the picture. Click on it again so it gets bigger. It should then have a url that ends with the letters jpg. Copy and paste that url in your comment:
Well I tried that but every picture I brought up didnt have a Jpg in its link.
One more time for the boys back home
Did I do it?
you did it!
HURRAH!!!
Apparently it’s because I was using google and not bing. Most of the pictures on google do not have jpg in their urls even when i click for a larger image.
Hahahahaha and he still wont admit he’s a dummy. Even deal knew how to post pics.
Deal is very smart. She just doesn’t share your politics because low in psychopathy & Native American
Someone who didn’t know how to post a picture is still smarter than someone who denies russiagate.
Facts.
Mug of Pee didn’t know how to post pics until I told him
^^^LIE^^^
peepee is a compulsive liar.
It’s true. Your long-term memory is slipping
Hey Pumpkin, what do you think of this chart:
Click to access psat-nmsqt-understanding-scores.pdf
Do you think that the national percentiles (the chart on the left) could represent an IQ equivalent?
Hey Pumpkin, what do you think of this chart:
Click to access psat-nmsqt-understanding-scores.pdf
Do you think that the national percentiles (chart on the left) are equivalent to IQ percentiles, or do you think that they are grossly inflated, and if so, by how much?
They’re supposed to be nationally representative (though HS dropouts are excluded) so they should be roughly IQ percentiles (U.S. norms) but it’s strange how little they differ from the norms of actual PSAT takers.
They differ more for 11th grade students. Do you think that the average PSAT testee represents the average American student with an IQ of 100? How would you go about adjusting either chart?
complete opposite of duh chroof peepee.
1. all genuinely high IQ negroes (like robeson) are marxists. and by “marxists” i don’t mean what fox news and other retards mean (which is nothing). i mean they’re students of marx and engels and agree with them.
2. such blacks will never be promoted as great authors for the same reason white authors of such “orientation” will never be.
3. in subjective fields like literature black accomplishment is fake. and most white and ‘gina person accomplishment is too.
when a nigerian proves some long standing conjecture in number theory…but even this is not totally objective apparently, viz. the abc conjecture.
and actually long arms can be an advantage in ping pong and this is associated with height and long legs. but the table is 30″/76cm.
so the ideal ping pong player is short with short legs too. but has long arms.
india should start recruiting andaman pygmies with long arms for ping pong.
after all, indians can’t win any athletic competition.
i predict that and andaman pygmy with weirdly long arms will win the olympic gold medal in ping pong in the next olympics.
The fact that india’s the world’s most malnourished country might have something to do with that.
But when reared in the first world, an indian was the best ping pong player in america
https://www.espn.com/olympics/story/_/id/23923722/this-kanak-jha-america-table-tennis-phenom
churchill
pitt the younger
ataturk
these are disconfirmation of peepee’s first nations theory of alcohol’s effect on the brain.
So misreading rushtons book and it’s very good so far but a bit dry. The book is kind of like reading an academic lit review.
#im reading
The chapter ‘race and racism in history’s. Wow. There is a lot of material out there about race I never knew existed. Universally it seems all races of man viewed Africans as low in intelligence since records began. This is really damning stuff.
Because it easy to say whites are racist based on their claims of the last 200 years. But it’s much harder to say the whole world is racist since the year 32ad where he quotes a Greek doctor gallen calling blacks stupid.
For me this is the ‘smoking gun’ of hbd. Hbd people should talk about this evidence more than the stuff about ‘IQ’, or later European theories of aryans and social darwinism.
If something is a universal view held for hundreds of years …..its the smoking gun.
The quote from Gallen is from an Arab manuscript that was done by a Arab who hated blacks. He accused blacks of having big dicks. Gallen himself thought of Aristotle and other Greeks as very correct and good. Aristotle, Hippocrates and many others considered warm climates and southern lands to be associated with intelligence and organisation, but Aristotle thought that there was a caveat of southern populations also being lazier and more servile. Chinese and Arabs have always entertained black inferiority but there were HBD debates in the Arab world, there wasn’t consensus in the Arab world. Did you buy the book?
In japan there was a 6’2 black samurai (huge for medieval Japanese who were shorter than today) who reached some of the highest ranks in Japanese society. Please google it, its pretty bizarre.
One problem with rushton’s book is he depends heavily on the writings of Bernard Lewis who was a huge neocon & considered the intellectual father of the Iraq war. Lewis had a vested interest in making arabs look racist which I don’t doubt they were, but I’d rather hear it from someone less biased
Many more problems exist with Rushton’s book than that.
And Rushton was the definition of biased. Constance Hilliard has a solid expose of hereditarians in her book Straightening the Bell Curve.
I think Rushton’s biggest blinder was surveying blacks, whites and Asians at a shopping mall on their sex frequency.
What a clown.
Rushton was biased but Jensen was beyond reproach. Even Flynn has the highest respect for Jensen
I’m glad you admit that Rushton was biased (it’s very clear he was).
What you you mean by “Jensen was beyond reproach”?
He didn’t have a racist or biased bone in his body. He was a man of towering scientific integrity.
OK, I think after looking at Ruston’s data and reading the arguments its clear that asians are smarter than whites and generally more K selected on about 50 different chronometric indicators.
But it seems most of it is in performance and spatial IQ. I have no idea why this is.
Obviously if you include jews in the white category that means whites have the highest verbal IQs…which might explain some of the cultural achievement mismatches with our ‘intellectual superior’ asian colleagues.
The other thing I find interesting about Rushton’s work so far is how he doesn’t mention jews at all. Every time he quotes his opponents, he is usually mentioning a jew. Its rather sad that he thinks he can’t mention it because it would be more iconoclastic than saying blacks are dumb.
Its a pity Afro isn’t around. If he read the book, there can be no doubt in any sane person’s mind, that blacks are R selected – with all the advantages that has in motor skills and music and whatnot.
The higher spatial IQ was caused by surviving cold winters where you need to build shelter, sew clothes, make fire, hunt large animals & find your way home before it freezes.
By contrast Jews have lower spatial IQ than whites because they evolved for capitalism which is all about math & verbal
Just-so stories.
you know that flushton was a lawyer for his client right? and you know he couldn’t claim whites were the best right? you know he had to use the asian stuff as a shield against accusations of white supremacism from you know who right?
an equally good case can be made that ne asians are inferior to western europeans and are NOT k selected. not long ago ‘gina had the same tfr as mali. http://www.china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_TFR_1.htm
but iirc the case for the mongoloid PIQ > VIQ is solid. no way to explain it except hbd.
whereas jewish VIQ has cultural explanations.
I believe East Asians have higher spatial IQs because their agricultural systems relied heavily on mathematical and spatial applications more than any other part of the world. You can see they didn’t make a lot of advancements in mathematics or in astronomy or any field of importance in STEM other than engineering. They engineered the best things but were limited to just that. Anyways, yeah, I read somewhere that Asians were able to acquire spatial superiority due to the system of counting rice in their fields and stuff.
interesting that your comments should intervene…as you are a self-identified indian.
let me say this…
1. i have spilled more EtOH than you will ever consume.
2. i appreciate the gita and the upanishads more than you ever will.
because…
A…
REE…
ANNE.
sad!
In a way its true that knowing all this changes nothing, in the sense that in a just world we treat the individual on merits. But that argument is lacking because a great deal of political and public policy decision, like immigration policy, are based on group averages.
no. pill needs to go back on his medication.
And who invented all that? White people did. Not only do they have external politics applied to people of different races but they also politick within their own race. Never has the white man come to terms with meritocracy. For them, meritocracy will never exist and they basically applied that same institutional foundation for people of other races. Simply put, whites never had and never saw the value in a meritocracy. Not a single white can claim they want meritocratic foundations in our society. A white would advocate for as much meritocratic behaviors as a Jew would.
The other result is that statistically speaking, melo is likely to have a higher IQ than even a Cameroonian. So if Melo believes in Russia, who the fuck knows what the limit of obviously contrived nonsense an average cameroonian would fall for.
maybe i confused “austronesians” with “australasians”.
the former refers to people like manny pacquiao and the smoking baby, the latter to abos.
but it doesn;t matter.
THE FACT IS THAT ‘GINA PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO EUROPEANS GENETICALLY THAN THEY ARE TO FILIPINOS AND OTHER MALAYS…
MALAY = INDIGENE OF THE MALAY ARCHIPELAGO
this is typical behavior of melo’s people:
“GINA PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO EUROPEANS GENETICALLY THAN THEY ARE TO FILIPINOS AND OTHER MALAYS”
Source?
My father was from the Philippines. He was running around on the street until a white veteran married his mom, which explains his enormous social IQ. He basically had to become a con man to survive.
Filipinos are basically dark skinned East asians. Mix that with white it’s no wonder every retard thinks I’m hispanic.
recall tom hagen.
i am tom hagen to rr’s fredo, to…
melo’s guy selling fruit when vito goes down…
pill’s meyer lansky…
this is sad.
RR is definitely Michael, but if I’m anybody I’m Sonny.
I have a huge temper and an enormous penis. I’d get shot up after whoopin the guy abusing my sister.
You know how I know that this guy, the Philosopher, is a fucking fraud…it’s because he doesn’t take the time to read, understand, and respond to the ideas of others. All his comments are just opinionated statements that rely heavily on his intuition, never actual empirical formations of how the world functions. His intuitions are outdated and he doesn’t have a clue how the world is changing rapidly, just as most whites on the Internet don’t. They think that institutional knowledge suffices. In the case of this guy, the Philosopher, you see that he’ll point out the quirks in other peoples’ style of writing and communicating, never actually address the issue at hand. He’s too much of a pussy to actually get to the heart of the matter and try to rebut someone’s argument.
Philosopher isn’t white
Then what the hell is he?
Loaded,
I’ve been saying this for a while now. Philosopher has no self awareness. He prides himself on abilities that are nonexistent
Why do you think Russiagate is a myth? Trying understand the mental gymnastics behind this.
Actually blacks aren’t the lowest, aborigines and Melo are down there as well.
Australoids are black if you go by evolutionary taxonomy
Why does a guy call himself an SJW ironically on an alt right blog?
Because I am a social justice warrior. I’m fighting for gentiles peoples civil rights. Such as the right to exclude illegal immigrants.
Pill do you ever feel jealous of asperger people that got really rich from their obsession? There’s not much money in obsessing over Jews.
They already have that right.
However, any rational person agrees that what’s happening with ICE is fucked up.
the same is true for the people who did that study on cranial capacity.
it was politically impossible for them to find the truth so they didn’t.
the only people with brains possible as large as europeans are aleuts.
even mongolians and siberians average less than averages i’ve posted here for british…who don;t have the biggest brains in europe.
but on a height adjusted basis ne asians do have larger brains.
but it seems this is due to a small minority of yuge headed ne asians. casual observations shows ne asians have smaller heads.
because head size and brain size are not just correlated with height, but also with bulk, robustness…hence the yuge brains of cro-magnons, neanderthals, and the strangely large brains of the tropical people the polynesians.
No rushton’s canial capacity study was scrutinized by critics who recalculated everything. Asian Americans have bigger cranial capacity than whites even before body size adjustments (at least in the army & assuming lee & pearson’s regression formula from 1904 was valid in the 1980s), though the Asian advantage was driven entirely by women
what’re the odds that you get moon and daltrey on the same team?
or is their supposed genius all down to townshend?
recall…
The Who’s genius can only be fully appreciated at EAR BLEED volume.
so gay i forgot this…
you can hear it!
he beats the drumbs to death!
but moon was NOT a sine qua non.
after moon was dead…
again…TURN IT UP…
I appreciate the Philosopher, though. One thing I would have to say is that he mainly makes generalizations of the world out of intuition. Whites don’t do that. They stick to the code of gathering information from personal experience. No, not the experiences of others, not any logically contrived information, only their personal experiences. If they meet an Indian, their whole belief of who and what Indians are basically comes from that single encounter. Whites suck at imagination when it comes to race and behavioral analysis.
In general, from a cognitive perspective, whites, though less than Asians, have less mental flexibility, meaning their thoughts and ideas are rigidly built up in their brain and have a tough time trying to adapt their mind to a change in the world. This is probably due to being on the higher end of the autism spectrum as a population. Once an idea is formed in their head about something, it’s hard for them to break out of it. You don’t see the same thing in populations higher on the schizo end of the spectrum, actually. Their worldviews are constantly changing and their always gathering new information about how the world works. So in a sense, adaptation is not the same as intelligence, at least not for whites or Asians.
Pumpkin did a whole article on Asians having lower autism rates. Well, maybe he should of looked into their rates of other mental illnesses, which are arguably under-diagnosed for various reasons, yet are still apparent throughout their societies. Asians seek out visually and emotionally stimulating context through media as a way of dropping out from the world. They’re a very isolated and behaviorally addicted people who can’t handle stress. I am no scientist but I have done independent scientific research about hormones in the human body and it seems as though Asians can’t handle stress well, particularly that from the stress hormone cortisol. I suspect east Asians have very low cortisol levels, apparent from their facial structures to their morphology all the way down to their cognitive and behavioral profile. They thrive in low-cortisol environments. Bump up their cortisol levels and they start acting like an Alzheimer’s patient.
Asians have very bad stress tolerance, that’s without a doubt. They may also have higher likelihood of developing schizophrenia due to their prenatal environment as well as their genetics. Bipolar is very common in East Asians. This can be verified by the criminally-addictive behavior many East Asians have. All in all, East Asians are not a superior race. They are defeated by their lack of cognitive complexity and more importantly, a dearth of resilience.
I’ve always said…give a white man the same T levels as a black man and they’ll start acting far more egregiously than a black man ever would. Same holds true for East Asians. Unfortunately, with whites, we’re actually seeing that! For some reason, we’re seeing an amplification of white people acting egregiously across the world. I think this can be attributed to T levels coming back to normal in the last half-decade or so…
I dunno, but I sure hope that we can brainwash whitey into thinking the same way they did a few years back. The white man has no moral integrity and no inhibitions. They’ll do whatever to get their piece of the pie and more. White genocide isn’t coming from outside, people, it’s an inside job! White people are their own biggest enemies and the sooner they find that out, the sooner they can start addressing their problems.
According to RR blacks and whites have the same level of testosterone.
pill should give more evidence that he actually has a degree in econ.
i only took 2 econ courses, intro micro and intro macro, A+ in both and one of the teachers tried to recruit me/groom me to the gay religion of econ.
but pill’s point is that a smaller fraction of earnings are retained earnings because businesses have become feudal lords not world changers/improvers.
this is (((graeber)))’s explanation of bullshitization.
____________________>
____________________>>> = http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0UIDyL7yupE/TmUX6NKHM9I/AAAAAAAAGS4/v02Qasn9nqA/s1600/Mugabe%2B1.jpg
>
He went to Istanbul for treatment, where he was diagnosed with cirrhosis of the liver. Throughout most of his life, he had been a heavy drinker, often consuming half a liter of rakı a day.
Pitt became known as a “three-bottle man” in reference to his heavy consumption of port wine.
and churchill woke up for a scotch and drank all day.
the point is NOT that alcoholism can’t savage the brain.
the point is the effect on the brain varies a lot and is mediated by nutrition.
to such an extent that…
there are examples of people performing at the very highest level who were drunks and had been drunks for decades.
One thing about rushtons methodology doesn’t make sense – revising for body size. This is like saying basketball players skill should be ‘adjusted’ for height. It doesn’t make much sense to correct a trait that is inherently linked to another trait. So maybe the Asian advantage means nothing.
Puppy comment on this?
No it makes sense.
If you don’t adjust for body size, elephants have bigger brains than people.
But if you do adjust for body size, humans have brains 7.6 times larger than expected for a mammal our size. This is by far the highest ratio ever observed in nature & we are by far the smartest species
So if comparing species requires body size adjustments, comparing races might too.
The reason is that bigger animals need more brain mass just to coordinate the extra bulk, so controlling for body size may remove one source of brain size variation unrelated to intelligence
The comparisons among animal is fine. But if you were asking who was the most skillful basketball player or the best bodybuilder you would look at absolutes.. if as you say a person has a higher iq if they have a bigger brain then by definition whites would be smarter. Doesn’t matter about body shape or size.
You look at absolutes when it comes to performance (i.e. test score) but not nessecarilily on the physicality that caused the performance.
For example if I wanted to predict who was the best long distance runner, I wouldn’t just look at height, I would look at height adjusted for weight because the latter correlates better with long distance running performance
Of course in humans it’s unclear whether adjusting for body size increases the brain size correlation with IQ. It’s also unclear if whites have bigger absolute brains because in the single best study (U.S. army, ) Asians had bigger absolute brains too
If brain size is related to iq. The mass of the body is irrelevant. Rushtons datasets show asians have slightly bigger or similar brain sizes unadjusted for body size. This seems the key finding.
Anyway If taller people have bigger brains it should follow they are smartest. We know that’s not always true. So brain size isn’t the best indicator then. Just one of many proxies.
An iq test is better or the technique rushton talks about where they measure the amount of neurons seems more accurate than putting measuring tape around someone’s head.
The mass of the body might be relevant because given equal brain size, a more muscular person will have less brain mass left over for mental tasks, because much of it is used to coordinate the extra bulk
Why still talk about brain/body size when Herculano-Houzel blew that up?
She didn’t blow anything up except her career. Nobody talks about her except for you
At an absolute scale. Whites will have most people in the extreme high end of intelligence even accounting for east Asia massive population. This is simply a property of being bigger and taller which itself may be linked to historically better nutrition.
At least in the U.S. (army) Asians seem to have bigger brains both in absolute sense & especially after body size adjustments
I haven’t seen data to support this narrative. Edward Dutton also believes in this, but he doesn’t provide a source; which is curious, because Dutton was part of the study that showed Europeans do have higher traits for individualistic thinking compared to Asians. Asians having lower frequencies of traits for individuality and inquisitiveness could easily imply a high potency of creativity in intelligence that they lack. However, he chooses that higher standard deviation hypothesis. Asians also seem to have lower verbal IQs than whites, but again, that’s thrown to the wayside for the higher standard deviation hypothesis; a higher verbal IQ could also explain the creativity gap, I believe.
Lots of people on this blog talk shit that they can’t back up. Like bro, you ain’t a champion of anything other than obsolete facts and talking shit. Like learn to understand what’s actually happening around you instead of trying to build your own world that is a direct contradiction to the truth. Let’s put everything aside and just critically think for once.
Also, Ian, you’ve got no culture. Unfortunately, there’s nothing you can identify with culturally. You scum-motherfuckers from white countries always thinking that you can appreciate culture more than anyone else because you don’t have one. That’s not how it works, buddy. You are a cultureless, brazen asshole who thinks he can claim intellectual ownership of anything he thinks he’s worthy of understanding…wow! Just….wow!
shitting in the street is NOT a culture. reincarnation and karma are dumb ideas. the caste system is satanic. you suck at cricket. deal with it!
for melo,
this is a typical filipino:
i’ve posted this before:
north chinese aren’t here, but japs and dog barbecuers and other ne asians are closer to europeans and native amaricans than to malays and indo-‘gina people.
“this is a typical filipino:”
Actually this is:
However, Filipinos I wouldn’t even consider a race or even an ethnicity (maybe) there is such considerable variation. I look like a whiter version of the above, while some of course look like negritos.
I appreciate the source, it’s interesting because Fiipinos are phenotypically more like East asians which is what matters to Selection. Also I’m not exactly sure the point of the picture or the tree. I don’t really care about my race, as it is inconsequential to my individual intelligence or beliefs.
I’ve said it once I’d say it again that could actually be me in your picture and I’d still be more intelligent than you. The proof is in our exchanges. But as you say, dumb people don’t know they’re dumb, so I don’t expect you to get it.
It’s funny you think I admire Indian culture. I’m self-identified Pakistani, you libtard. On top of that, I admire culture based more on chronology than geography. I don’t care about ancient Indian culture. Whoever does is probably wasting their tijme significantly! I only care about the advancements of the future. So stop putting me in a box, you old piece of shit! I know you’re just jealous I’m young and can take on the world unlike your backwards ass.
if i were a paki i would self-identify as an islamophobe and i would shave my back hair.
major religions of the world in reverse order of dumbness (so excluding minor religions like scientology and mormonism):
1. eastern orthodox christianity
2. roman christianity
3. orthodox judaism
4. protestantism
5. taoism
6. zen buddhism
7. tibetan buddhism
8. theravada biddhism
9. hinduism (the vedanta school is the best)
10. shiah islam
11. sunni islam
12. non-orthodox judaism
13. capitalism
Ian’s a pathetic motherfucker. [redacted by pp, aug 30, 2019] At this point, you sound like a madman shouting your New Age truths to the world. At least that’s how I see you. Try to be more pleasant and understanding that your world is long gone. It’s time for you to make room for the new and the bold and the brave who will actually change this world for the better! Ian, please….reach out to a psychiatrist and find out what’s happening to you, please. You’ll feel a lot better in the monring.
*morning
‘gina people: Han Imperial Library…At the time of inventory contained 596 works
greeks: The Royal Library of Alexandria, Egypt, fl. 3rd century BC (c. 295 BC).
Founded by Ptolemy, this library was said to have amassed an estimated 400,000 manuscripts…
iran: The Academy of Gondishapur in western Iran, established during the Persian Sassanid Empire in the 3rd through 6th centuries.
The breadth of this institution was enormous and included a university, teaching hospital, and a library filled with over 400,000 titles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_libraries_in_the_ancient_world#Italy
sad!
It’s a testament to Morrison’s high IQ writing style that Beloved is considered way too difficult for university undergads,
No, that’s a testament to the stupidity of university undergrads