A commenter named “Ray” writes in the comment section:
…I’d like to ask you if you can estimate the IQ of a cousin of me based on his intellectual milestones:
-Prior to his 1st birthday he spoke very well and he was very inquisitive
-At age 3 he learned to read and write on his own (my aunt taught him the alphabet, but she never taught him to read per se).
-At age 6 he was reading a college textbook on ondontology and he grasped a great deal of it, though he got bored afterwards-
-At age 6 he used to read textbooks on mathematics (prealgebra), social studies, Spanish Literature and 6th grade physics, chemistry and biology
-At age 12 he began reading Marx’s “Das Kapital” and became obsesed with economics and political philosophy afterwardsHe’s currently 17, an avid reader and very well-versed in philosophy, economics and biology (genetics).
Based on this what would you think his IQ is? It’s clear that he has an astounding verbal IQ, though he is depressed because there are better students in math than him.
I hope you answer 🙂
I’ll focus on the three least ambiguous data points.
Research suggests that at first toddlers “will be able to mutter only about four to six words, but at around 18 months, a real spurt in vocabulary will take place, and your Chatty Cathy’s list of go-to words will increase to about 50.”
It sounds like your cousin had acquired the speaking skills of a 1.5-year-old by age 0.9 or so, which would imply he was functioning at 167% of his chronological age and thus a ratio IQ of 167 (1.5/0.9 = 1.67)
Meanwhile reading and writing are not typically acquired until age six, so having achieved this at three implies he was functioning at 200% of his chronological age and thus a 200 ratio IQ (6/3 = 2.00)
Lastly, doing grade six (age 11) physics at age six implies a ratio IQ of 183 (11/6 = 1.83) though doing physics of any kind seems way beyond even 11-year-olds.
Averaging all three ratio IQs together (unlike deviation IQs, ratio IQs can be averaged) gives a ratio IQ of 183.
However ratio IQs are only normally distributed from IQ 50 to 150 (though with a slightly inflated mean and SD).

Source: Bias in Mental Testing by Arthur Jensen
Above 150 there is an excess of scores, perhaps because the variance is greater at some ages than others and this becomes noticeable at extremes or perhaps because the linear relationship between age and cognitive development is limited to a narrow range, causing the ratio to become meaningless beyond these limits.
Modern IQ tests get around this problem by forcing scores to fit the bell curve. So since it’s known that only one in 72,000 to 109,000 have ratio IQs in the 180s we can locate the normalized IQ (sigma 15) that fits this rarity, and we end up with an IQ of 164.
Of course this would only reflect your cousin’s early childhood IQ. Given only about a 0.62 correlation between early childhood IQ and late adolescent IQ, the typical IQ 164 child regresses into an IQ 140 young adult ((164 – 100)(0.62)) + 100 = 140 with 95% of cases ranging from 117 to 163.
However by age 10, IQ begins to solidify, and the fact that your cousin was enjoying Marx by age 12 implies his (verbal) IQ had remained above 140 (top 0.5%). Charles Murray notes that just under 10% of even young adults can score high enough on the verbal SAT to likely understand traditional college reading and I’ve found that the top 10% of young adult verbal skill equates to the top 0.5% of age 12 verbal skill. And Marx might be a lot harder than even traditional college material so I might be dramatically underestimating your cuz.
But even 140 (white norms) is incredibly high. It might not sound that impressive when you hear that Harvard’s average SAT score equated to an IQ of 143, but just as your cousin’s childhood IQ of 164 might have regressed to an adult IQ of 140, Harvard’s SAT derived IQ of 143 likely regresses to an IQ in the 120s on official IQ tests.
So even 140 is enough to tower at even the most elite universities on the planet (at least in the non-STEM departments).
140 is to IQ as 6’6″ is to height: Head and shoulders above the competition.
And you could estimate this readers IQ on the basis of his sharing 25% dna with his 140 IQ cousin and being a reader of your blog 😉
Thank you for your answer PP!
This might be interesting for you, he did an online Mensa IQ online (Raven’s progressive matrices) and for some reason he scored 125 (as your regression predicted). The test was iqtest.dk
He’s not American (We are from Costa Rica), so he doesn’t have to take the SAT, although he want to take it anyways only to know how well he’d do if he took it.
He said me that he doesn’t want to pay 50$-100$ for taking the test, so he will estimate what would be his score based on the practice tests of Khanacademy.org (they are linked to College Board, so the difficulty of the questions is similar).
When he finish, I’ll give you his score range, if you are interested ;D
Yes that would be quite interesting
Took the test at iqtest.dk, and scored 140. I was measured at 139 in elementary school so it’s probably a pretty good estimate.
Verbal IQ in the 140s but performance IQ in the 120s. I wouldn’t say iqtest.dk is measuring full scale IQ.
I re-took the iqtest.dk after last looking at it about 5 years ago. I scored 117. Very accurate.
So in regards to my earlier comment, even if the Elites were not actively depopulating the planet, our “current” form of capitalism is not perpetually sustainable anyway. All countries on the planet operate as corporations looking to maximise their profits, thus all countries are on the same developmental track only following the most optimal strategies to earn money. The most profitable exports are oil and entertainment. Now we use the most developed country on the planet, as determined by GDP per capita, the country of Macau as a model to empirically prove our current form of capitalism is not perpetually sustainable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macau
Macau is one of only 8 countries on the planet with $0 in debt, and also the highest income among those 8 countries. Macau has a population of 650,900 in an area of 30.5 km2 (11.8 sq mi), it is the most densely populated region in the world.
Macau is the gambling capital of the world. Its economy is heavily dependent on gambling and tourism, and in 2006 it surpassed Las Vegas as the world’s largest gambling center by revenue. It has a very high Human Development Index and the fourth-highest life expectancy in the world. Macau is among the world’s richest regions and its GDP per capita by purchasing power parity was higher than that of any country in the world. In 2015, Macau was ranked as the fastest growing metropolitan area in the world by the Brookings Institution.
However this economic model is not perpetually sustainable as it does not reach the replacement fertility rate. Replacement fertility is the total fertility rate at which women give birth to enough babies to sustain population levels. The global average for the replacement total fertility rate (leading to a stable global population) is 2.33 children per woman.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate
Macau’s fertility rate in the year 2016 was 1.31 children per woman and in 2017 0.95 children per woman, and has been below replacement levels since its rapid growth 1970’s. Economic development itself is the greatest contraception.
Just as eventually the Sun’s energy will eventually burn out, just as the worlds oil supply will eventually run, eventually the world population will be so culled that there will be no more migrants, no more immigrants and no more tourists bringing new money and human capital into countries. What happens then? At this point I will tell you exactly what is going to happen, and what is not going to happen.
We are not going to tear down the cities, or get rid of technology and go back to sustenance farming in order to create a surplus of humans to simply repeat the industrialization, and development process all over again. This is based that on the fact that humans have never in history de-volved a society.
What is going to happen is the government/corporations will simply manufacture the sustainable amount of humans. Governments/corporations will use a combination of techniques that have already been implemented thru-out history, selective breeding, breeder fathers, breeder mothers, genetic modification and cloning to accomplish this goal. The government/corporations will use media profiles, surveys, polls, census data, phycology tests, IQ tests, any and all data possible to manufacture average humans whom simply blend in with the non manufactured humans so as to not cause a public panic. Fertility records will be doctored, regulated, and on a need to know basis.
Corporations currently manufacture everything except humans. Corporations eventually manufacturing humans is in fact a necessity for future populations to sustain themselves and for Capitalism to sustain itself.
Now of course plenty of people will reproduce the natural way, however eventually, every human on Earth will be a descendant of at least 1 corporation/government entity.
If I were to write a book it would be on this subject, I specialize in the study of fertility just as Pumpkin specializes in the study of IQ.
“The Elites have already tried complete population control and failed multiple times. For example,The eugenics program, China’s 1 child policy. Every attempt at complete control has failed miserably. As I have explained before, no population’s fertility rate that dips below the replacement rate of 2 children per woman, climbs back up, government intervention has no effect, it simply plummets until the population goes extinct or emigrates elsewhere. Women have never given up their newfound rights and lives, to become birth mothers for the sake of a stable population,no matter what program the governments tries.The reason the migrant crisis is going on is because no government has been able to completely control a population, they lowered their numbers, the numbers became too low, and they cannot bring them back up so their only option is to bring in new citizens from someplace else. Once the world population has lowered and there are no more immigrants capable of coming in. The Elite will once again attempt to completely control a smaller population, and it will again fail, like it has every time before.
The Elite will never stop trying to control every aspect of the commoners life. So far total control over a group of human beings has shown to be impossible. Even under slavery in the plantation days, a small % of slaves always ran away or revolted, even under such oppressive circumstances total control was shown to be impossible.
Now because of the Elite’s absurd thinking we are all, including themselves paying the price.
in short their goal as of now is de-population. Once it has reached the desired levels of 500 million to a couple billion as stated by world leaders, and The Georgia Guide stones, they will try once again at complete control.
However what the elite do not understand is that their own offspring are just as effected by the de-population as the commoner. I have cross-referenced the fertility of the new money, millennial/generation z millionaires and billionaires, with the old money, and the royal families of the world. The Old Money would average about 6 children per family, during the 50’s 60’s 70’s just like the commoner, and now in modern times all 3 demographics, New money Old money, and royal families, all have
had their fertility drop to near abysmal levels.
I’ll share one example The Swedish royal family fertility began to decline around the 1850’s and now it has died out this generation due to having a single heir 1 princess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kings_of_Sweden_family_tree
The fertility levels of the Elite are the same as everyone else’s these days 0-1 children because the Elite and their children, eat the same food, breathe the same air, consume the same drugs, and live under the same chem trail sprayed, polluted environment we do. However it is more than just that. I also cross referenced the % of male children being born vs female. Before the global fertility crisis the elite were having significantly more sons than daughters. Now the Elite are having much more daughters than sons, and the commoners are having more sons than daughters, with the average fertility rate of 0-1 children being the same for each group.
This offspring ratio dimorphism happens because of the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis. Which has been empirically proven to be true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivers–Willard_hypothesis
“In polyandrous species where some females mate with multiple males (and others get no matings) and males mate with one/few females (i.e., “sex-role reversed” species), these predictions from the Trivers–Willard hypothesis are reversed: parents in good condition will invest in daughters in order to have a daughter that can out-compete other females to attract multiple males, whereas parents in poor condition will avoid investing in daughters who are likely to get out-competed and will instead invest in sons in order to gain at least some grandchildren.” this is exactly what is happening to the elite families
Although this does not function properly with humans because we are not naturally polyandrous. So under this man made polyandry, where rich people have more daughters their reproductive success lowers not increases.
So now we have a situation were poor people need daughters but they get sons and rich people need sons but they get daughters.
We are now living in an accidently created man made Polyandrous society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry
Very lengthy. I see some interesting stuff here but you might wanna consider multiple posts for short attention-span people like me. Or create your own blog.
i guess my own blog would work. Pumpkin if I email you, would you walk me thru how to create a blog setup like yours?
it’s very simple. just create a wordpress account and wordpress will walk you through. learn through trial and error.
Is it necessarily a regression that occurs? Couldn’t your IQ increase from childhood? I definitely feel smarter now than when I was 16.
By definition most people are normal, so it’s more likely your IQ will move towards the norm than away from it.
If there is a regression to the mean, how does that affect the bell curve?
As in is there a bell curve for childhood IQ score?
The bell curve stays the same for kids & adults, but people change in their place on the curve as they develop.
Ah, okay. Thanks.
When you write that Harvard students would regress on a clinical IQ test, you assume this because the correlation between SAT and WAIS is about 0.7? So a SAT score in the rarity of 143 would equal around IQ 130? But is that really correct for a group? My knowledge in statistics is very limited, but doesn’t a correlation of 0.7 just mean the scores are more spread out (upwards and downwards)? So the mean could still be 143 but with a wider variation?
In a standardized bivariate normal distribution, the more spread out the scores get, the less steep the regression line gets, & the flatter the regression line, the closer its mean y coordinates are to 0 (the population mean)
Think of the 10 best basketball players in America. Are they the 10 tallest people in America? They’re all extremely tall, but nowhere near the top 10. They’ve regressed to the mean given the imperfect correlation between basketball & height.
It’s because they have been chosen at least partly on the sat. Imagine Harvard wouldn’t know the sat score when they select people. And then after they select them, they discovered they are at 1 in 250 level (140). Then, they probably wouldn’t regress to the mean even with a Wechsler test because they wouldn’t have been selected by the SAT (they still would somewhat, because there is probably a correlation among Say and GPA independent of g, that would be linked to industriousness and maybe a mixture of social anxiety and narcissism wich have students selected more prone to prepare intensively than they are intelligent). But it would be far less.
A perfect example would be google engineers. If you give them the SAT, they probably would score the same, or even less than with a Wechsler test. Because they haven’t been selected at all on Sat.
Makes sense ?
By Michael “Mikey Blayze” Graham
Global Fertility, Populaion Control, Capitalism Sustainability and New World Mating System
REPORT
“The Power Elite”, the small group of people who have a disproportionately large amount of control or influence (over society, politics, wealth, global affairs, etc) throughout History have tried complete and total population control using depopulation for at least the past 150 years and have failed not only multiple times, every time. For example ,The Eugenics Program, China’s 1 Child Policy, and Chattel Slavery. Every attempt at complete control has failed miserably.
The Elite will never stop trying to control every aspect of the commoners life. So far total control over a group of human beings has shown to be impossible. Even under Chattel Slavery in the plantation days, a small % of slaves always ran away or revolted, even under such oppressive circumstances total control was shown to be impossible. Even today as shown by the number of documented and undocumented prison escapes, total control is an impossible goal. However as much control as possible is needed for sustained economic development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prison_escapes
Why exactly do the “Power Elite” want de-population and population control?
A Nations fertility rate naturally decreases as wealth and its measures such as Gross Domestic Product, the total value of goods produced and services provided in a country during one year increase. This is because women in society move out of the home and into the work force to contribute to the economy. Since All 211 countries on the planet operate under some form of a Capitalist Economic System. A Nation will want to maximise its profits. Therefore as many women as possible will be incentivised to work instead of produce babies. Eventually a Nation’s native population will continue to decline into extinction until it brings in immigrants to replensih its numbers and sustain the economy. The point at which this change occurs is determined by The Replacement Fertility. Replacement Fertility is the total fertility rate at which women give birth to enough babies to sustain population levels. The global average for the replacement total fertility rate (leading to a stable global population) is 2.1 – 2.33 children per woman. The terms Fertility Rate and Birth Rate can be used interchangeably.
No population’s fertility rate that drops below the replacement rate of 2.1 – 2.33 children per woman, has climbed back up, numerous government intervention programs have had no effect whatsoever, the fertility rate simply plummets into extinction until immigrants come in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_rate
210 out of the 211 countries on planet Earth have declining ferility. Some countries for example, the United States and Isreal have an inflated fertiliy rate shown on their census due to mass immigration and families bringing their children with them. The only country on the planet with a perpetually self sustaining population is Niger.
Niger’s fertility rate has stablized at just over 7 children per woman since the start of its fertility census due to over 85% of its inhabitants living as subsistence farmers. The women stay home and give birth while the men work the farmland. On the substinence farm children are an econimic benefit instead of a drain, incentivising women to produce more babies which is why this economic system is perpetually sustainable.
Our current system of Capitalism is not perpetually self sutainable and The Power Elite know this, hence the need for de-population and population control.
The Power Elite have chosen to artifically hasten the natural fertility decline economic development brings by way of a de-population agenda. Using vaccines, pesticides, chem trails, violence, forced sterilization and many other culling tacticts. Simply put a smaller global population is easier to control and for The Power Elite, their mindset is “The sooner the better.”
However what The Power Elite either do not understand or simply do not care about is that their own offspring are just as effected by their de-population agenda as the commoner. I have cross-referenced the fertility of the New Money, Millennial and Generation Z millionaires and billionaires, with the Old Money, and the royal families of the world. The Old Money would average about 6 children per family, during the 1950’s 60’s 70’s just like the commoner, and now in modern times all 3 demographics, New money, Old money, and royal families, all have had their fertility drop to near abysmal levels.
For example The Swedish royal family fertility began to decline around the 1850’s and now it has died out this generation due to having a single heir 1 princess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kings_of_Sweden_family_tree
The fertility levels of the Elite are the same as everyone else in very wealthy developed nations. 0-1 children because the Elite and their children, eat the same food, breathe the same air, consume the same drugs, and live under the same chem trail sprayed, polluted environment as the commoners. However it is more than just that. I also cross referenced the % of male children being born vs female. Before the global fertility crisis the elite were having significantly more sons than daughters. Now the Elite are having much more daughters than sons, and the commoners are having more sons than daughters, with the average fertility rate of 0-1 children being the same for each group.
This offspring ratio dimorphism happens because of the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis. Which has been empirically proven to be true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivers–Willard_hypothesis
“In polyandrous species where some females mate with multiple males (and others get no matings) and males mate with one/few females (i.e., “sex-role reversed” species), these predictions from the Trivers–Willard hypothesis are reversed: parents in good condition will invest in daughters in order to have a daughter that can out-compete other females to attract multiple males, whereas parents in poor condition will avoid investing in daughters who are likely to get out-competed and will instead invest in sons in order to gain at least some grandchildren.” this is exactly what is happening to the elite families
Although this does not function properly with humans because we are not naturally polyandrous. So under our current system of man made polyandry, The Power Elite have created they are having more daughters which is lowering their reproductive success not increasing it. Reproductive success is defined as an individual’s production of offspring per breeding event or lifetime.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_success
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry
So now wealthy developed nations are in a situation were commoners are better off genetically having daughers but concieve sons and The Power Elite are better off genetically with sons but concieve daughters. Thus by accelerating the natural fertility decline, The Power Elite have orchestrated their own genetic demise.
However just because their genes die out does not mean their idealogies will, in fact quite the opposite. Just as a wealthy developed nation must replace its native members with gentically different immigrants to keep the system going, so too will The Power Elite replace its former members to keep the system going.
I will now explain in more clear and precise detail even further how our Capitalist population is not perpetually self sustainable. The most profitable export as determined by measures of wealth such as gross domestic product, is entertainment. Since entertainment is also a perpetual resource. Every country on the planet will attempt to maximize its entertainment value and thus model itself after the most developed country on the planet, as determined by GDP per capita by purchasing power parity, the country of Macau.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macau
Macau is one of only 8 countries on the planet with $0 in debt, and also the highest income among those 8 countries. Macau has a population of 650,900 in an area of 30.5 km2 (11.8 sq mi), it is the most densely populated region in the world.
Macau is the gambling capital of the world. Its economy is heavily dependent on gambling and tourism, and in 2006 it surpassed Las Vegas as the world’s largest gambling center by revenue. It has a very high Human Development Index and the fourth-highest life expectancy in the world. In 2015, Macau was ranked as the fastest growing metropolitan area in the world by the Brookings Institution.
However this economic model is not perpetually sustainable as it does not reach the replacement fertility rate. Again the Replacement Fertility is the total fertility rate at which women give birth to enough babies to sustain population levels. The global average for the replacement total fertility rate (leading to a stable global population) is 2.1 – 2.33 children per woman.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate
Macau’s fertility rate in the year 2016 was 1.31 children per woman and in 2017 0.95 children per woman, and has been below replacement levels since its rapid growth 1970’s. Economic development itself is the greatest contraception.
Once The Power Elite lowered the population to controllable levels how will they sustain it under Capitalism? How will the Elite make Capitalism perpetually self sustainable?
Eventually there will be no more migrants, no more immigrants and no more tourists bringing new money and human capital into countries. What happens then? At this point I will tell you exactly what is going to happen, and what is not going to happen.
We are not going to tear down the cities, or get rid of technology and go back to sustenance farming in order to create a surplus of humans to simply repeat the industrialization, and development process all over again. This is based that on the fact that humans have never in history de-volved a society.
What is going to happen is the government/corporations will simply manufacture the sustainable amount of humans. Governments/corporations will use a combination of techniques that have already been implemented thru-out history, selective breeding, breeder fathers, breeder mothers, genetic modification and cloning to accomplish this goal. The government/corporations will use media profiles, surveys, polls, census data, phycology tests, IQ tests, any and all data possible to manufacture average humans whom simply blend in with the non manufactured humans so as to not cause a public panic. Fertility records will be doctored, regulated, and on a need to know basis.
Corporations currently manufacture everything except humans. Corporations eventually manufacturing humans is in fact a necessity for future populations to sustain themselves and for Capitalism to sustain itself.
Now of course plenty of people will reproduce the natural way, however eventually, every human on Earth will be a descendant of at least 1 corporation/government entity.
People will think you are a troll if you keep copying and pasting the same refrain Mike.
Puppy mentioned college reading material. I think they actually tested American graduates once on basic reading and math skills pre and post college and they found college doesn’t improve it at all. I read that in an article somewhere.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article24608056.html
Think this is one of them.
But there is actually a study done on basic reading and math skills and it also showed American colleges don’t ‘teach’ people how to be better.
My personal experience is that I became a lot better at critical thinking after I started a blog and possibly got worse at critical thinking listening to my economics lecturer tell me mass immigration is good for native workers in the dumbest fuckin model and empirical evidence Ill ever see.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article223414935.html#storylink=trendingstories
This is some good policy by Trump. Its a good example of how jews can actually make good policy even when they have bad intentions. (i.e. releasing more blacks into the wild)
Bruno are you a gaillet jaune? Or are you one of the ponces that supports Manchuko puppet Macron? You never state what side you are on. Its like you’re hiding something.
My background is very similar to Macron. My empathy is for Gilet Jaune. My brain tells me that social help should be lavishly given to ethnic French, included black from Caribbean and Indian Ocean,, but conditioned by sterilization after first child to halve the bottom half of population progressively. I think it’s too late to get rid of the 10 millions African. So they should be offered the same policy. If all help were cut, 80% would go away. Migrants are not the same in France than in the UK. Here, it’s families with social dificulties.
For people paying income tax, there should be a 10 points exemption (not capital income nor inheritance) for each child above the second until total exemption (12 children). I would tax capital revenue and transmission much more irrespective of international pressure because the market is local.
I would say it’s the kind of mild eugenist policies, with a social caring aspect, Singapour tried to enforce .
The media needs to start referring to african americans by the more politically correct term ‘persons of magical descent’. Very insensitive.
A token black guy in films who fills the stereotype of being impossibly old, wise and sometimes able to actually perform magic. Usually the magical negro is there to give guidance to the main white hero, which may explain why the magical negro stereotype is most popular in movies geared toward a white audience.
Some examples of recent popular negros are:
Chef from South Park, Morgan Freeman, Oracle from the Matrix and Barack Obama.
Some non- black magical negros:
Mr. Miyagi, Jackie Chan, Pai Mei
Hero: Oh no! I have to defeat my enemy and save the world from certain destruction!
Abraham: don’ worry chile, im a wise ole sage heeuh tah help ya through alla yo struggles.
Hero: Thank you magical negro, I suddenly feel a lot better. See you at the end of the movie! (walks off to begin quest)
Abraham: crazy chile’ (smiles and shakes head reminescing, then disappears in a cloud of smoke)
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=magical%20negro
HAHAHAHAHAHA
So what’s the point pill? They convince everyone that blacks are magical & then what? How do the elites benefit?
Is the goal to get whites to fall so in love with blacks that they stop mating with other whites & a more controllable mixed race population replaces the white one?
That is what we are seeing in the United States Pumpkin, you live in Canada. There’s not many African Americans running around. Chances are the only Africans you know of are college educated older professionals.
You have to live here to know what Pill is talking about.
That is what we are seeing in the United States Pumpkin
That’s why I’m asking him if he believes the white genocide theory (i.e. multiculturalism, feminism, gays, are all just part of one big scheme to stop whites from reproducing). I asked him before if gays were promoted as a form of white genocide & he denied it so i don’t know if pill even has a cogent theory.
It has nothing to do with control. It’s just virtue signaling.
Yeah, there is a white genocide, but you all do not understand that its an inside job done by other white gentiles. Competition usually occurs inside races, not between them. Thats why blacks enslaved other blacks. Intracompetition>>>>intercompetition. Plain and simple.
You always think very literally about things. No its not that per se. The propaganda first and foremost is there to make whites less tribal and to basically lose all common sense. For example, why nation states exist.
At heart, its an intellectual argument that whites shouldn’t be tribal and therefore dangerous to jewish social, economic and sexual interests presented in colourful psychological packaging. If it wasn’t blacks, jews would probably be promoting latinos in a similar fashion. Theres always a whipping boy.
Because your conspiracy theory makes more sense if you literally believe in the white genocide theory:
promoting blacks in media = more whites willing to date blacks & thus fewer white babies
promoting gays in media = more whites becoming gay and thus fewer white babies
promoting feminism = more white women working and fewer white babies
promoting hip-hop = more blacks having promiscuous sex and more black babies
promoting immigration = more non-white babies
promoting secularism = less religion & thus fewer white babies
Most of white fertility problem is due two general things
whites are mostly materialist, so they will not sacrifice themselves to raise more than one kid on avg
thanks CAPITALISM
whites are mostly stupid, unthinkers… from the left and from the right…
thanks stupid selection for mental slaves
AND, joos use all ”whites sins” commited against minorities as homossexuals/sexual diversity AND majorities as the women against them, because white culture has been historically evil, thanks for stupid whites who can’t think in reasonal ways and start to believe earlier in all types of bullshits possible, specially jewsusism.
BUT has less ”kids” today, and with a society where infant mortality dropped to very lower rates is not bad at all, because humans has promoted, or better, SPECIALLY WHITE MAELES, the death of environment everywhere…
Yes, most of environmentalists are whites, BUT most of anti-environments or son of the bitchies are WHITES, and i no doubt many them are jews.
Ever noticed why most crime is black-on-black and white-on-white? Because we are enemies with those with the closest phenotypes to us. Not just based on pigmentation, but cognituve traits, personalities, etc. That is the sole reason we form groups, to diversify the characteristics as much as possible. That is why we have leaders. Noticed how violence is decreasing as our communities diversify? Theres a reason for that. Homogenous societies are the most dangerous. Its consequences include self cucking and female empowerment. Look at Scandinavia, Japan, etc. Diversity in phenotypes is gpod for a society, not bad. Youd have to be a moron to believe ofherwise.
Ok, so diversity is not essential, nor is it beneficial. But diversity is bad as as the level of homogeneity some countries are experiencing. Just my take on it. Truth hurts.
This is a small list of highest distinguished scholars (24) from the most elite University. It would be good to draw some patterns :
https://www.harvard.edu/about-harvard/harvard-glance/about-faculty/university-professorships
I think Barry Mazur is a genious-intelligence that have helped creative people achieve genious results by providing them his brain power. So for that, high achievement (Low average medal field level) + Pygmalion effect. And he works with Elkies, in math55 classes (wich have not been very fruitful paradoxically)
Sorry for the off-topic but I would be interested to know if you could address this essay by NNT:
View at Medium.com
Or do an NNT IQ estimate😆
Within the next 7 days. And maybe much sooner
Or maybe wait for this…
this retard also no have a PONDERATION…
do you think he is rational*
No way…
”Mensa members: typically high “IQ” losers in Birkenstocks.”
Personal ideological motivation identified on just one sentence of this TRASH pseudo-philosopher…
we have a ”caucasian problem”, first of all
RATIO-NALITY
most people even don’t know they no have this in desirable levels… and this people is a majority…
I asked a person that had a (now defunct) website devoted to geniuses and their IQ estimations what my IQ is based on the following biographical data:
1. According to my mother, I learned how to read and write on my own without instruction when I was four and a half.
2. When I was six and a half years old I was tested for the first grade elementary school. The person who tested me, I presume a psychologist, advised my mother that I should skip a class.
The person estimated that my IQ is just above 140. To add further thing about me that I think are relevant: I’m a massive introvert and have always had difficulties with making friends. I’m the only one in my high school that has developed taste for classical music. My high school language teacher commended me for my broad vocabulary. I’m a philosophy/linguistics major and am now working on a PhD in philosophy and teaching myself Mandarin.
Did he overestimate or underestimate my IQ?
PhDs average at least 120, with philosophy PhDs averaging higher still. Add to that your childhood precocity and bilingualism and you’re probably well above 130.
Does he share ancestry with Oprah?? look at that cranial capacity!!
They don’t even look happy to be viral memes. Maybe because they know they’re freaks.
I’m pretty sure Thick Neck guy has some kind of chromosomal abnormality but I forget what it’s called.
we all know its a white genocide. Next topic
Mug of Pee strongly disagrees. He thinks it’s just the rich dividing & conquering the majority through identity politics, to keep them from uniting against the rich
We know that the man is wrong, let him believe in his delusions so we can move on.
There is no white genocide
No a genocide is a side effect. The elites don’t really care about population control in my opinion. They are only concerned about what happens in the present and near present, not 200 years from now. Its a bit like cigarette companies promoting cigarettes …. i.e. most of the customers will die much quicker but they still promote them, right?
“They are only concerned about what happens in the present and near present, not 200 years from now. Its a bit like cigarette companies promoting cigarettes”
Well said. But there are some agents that think longer term than others, say, the CCP, or royal families or rothchilds.
“There is no white genocide”
Agreed.
ONLY WAY to humankind evolve will be ELIMINATING CONSERFTARDS, peacefully OR not… it’s become very clear to me a horizon where they are, on very avg, the biggest force against the advancement of humanity in all its ways, EVEN or FUNDAMENTALLY the spiritual one, and it’s absolutely needed extract them, these PRIMATES, the earlier and always old-fashioned version of humanity. I’m not saying that leftilts are even better than them, just stupid but in different way.. BUT, leftilts, we like it or not, are the genuine heirs of iluminism over CONSERF delusional psychotic, parasitic and primitive cultural systems…
Improving advanced human beings, and eliminating primitive ones, fundamentally by absolute lack of character, and yes, most of truly degenerated human beings… ARE… CONSERFS AND RELIGIOUS.
They are the rocks of HEALTHY human advacement. It’s not negotiable, it’s just what human history has been, they, and its evil elites, always in the power, and then, huge hiatus of absolute philosophical alienations of all types.
Arent some forms of conservatism good for material and scientific gain? For example if women were baby factories we would have several factors more men to innovate etc.
Women are baby factories, “sigh” Capitalism turns the baby factories into workers, thus lowering the population below replacement, thus creating the need for immigrants, and after the immigrant population runs out companies and governments turn to cloning.
Iran, USSR, Cuba, China and even Angola (relative to other African nations) contradict that it’s capitalism, or liberalism. It’s about what jobs/education women have and medicine/contraceptives.
JEESUS…
do you believe ”men” [a minority of men are ‘inovative”] are absolutely-eternally more creative than ”women” and or it’s impossible to select highly creative women**
you sound a evil robot, just that, expected..
Conserfism is a false prudence against advancements less when they are promoting them… and when the advancement is primarily due to conserfism, for example, industrial revolution, the society become a food chain, again…
it’s always a fake advancement because it’s will be used for their parasitic classes, aka, ”elites”.
Most conserfs are intellectually and spritually sub-humans, or they are a mutated version, a surrealist, those who believe in bullshit specially mythologies, or they are materialistic atheists OR self-theists, most of them the worse of humankind.
I think I’m starting to grasp what you are having to say. But you have much nuance and reinterpretation of commonly used words, so care would be warranted for future understanding. The reason is suspect I partially grasp what you say is becuase you tend to talk about your worldview inhabiting both deductive reasoning and life experiences, kinda integrating them. I get the latter aspect but not the former, sometimes.
My question was not directed as my view conflicting with yours but merely as an hypothetical to get into your consideration of things and how they sustain their coherence. I should have released my question to: when do you think conservatism is true?
But I suspect I alreqdy got the awnser to that. And the awnser would be when they contradict the liberals wrongdoing.
A new question, what is progress? Is there an end to it? Do you believe in some destiny or god?
My worldview is A worldview but not based on material surface and always at existential essence, it’s mean, at universal ways, what is ideally right or wrong, based on human self-consciousness perspective, full-blown on-it and not what humans on very avg are indexed to behave.
Your hypothetical view is to treat woman as, unfortunately, reproductive cows, as this animal has been treated into the absolute subservience to human macro-pestilence. It’ totally dehumanizing, morally wrong, AND intellectually
what i said
most males are highly creative
so what
the fact macro human conjunture have favored males in cognitive skills it’ barrely mean: women are absolutely inferior; no have highly creative and truly talented ladies or it’s impossible to change this if we wanted..
For each ”5” geniuses of masculine pop we much more criminals, from the bottom of society to the top. Your view look like you think males are absolute superior, only gays can think like that, in deep ways.
”when do you think conservatism is true?”
when*
”A new question, what is progress? Is there an end to it? Do you believe in some destiny or god?”
Progress: any type of sucessive arrangement of changes, exemple, an eruption of vulcan…
”Is there an end to it?”
Ask this for science which search for totality of reality… specially in IDEAL ways, when it’s not corrupted by capitalism or comunism [i mean, in few piece of time].
Philosophy was born when human found the reality of totality, the sensation that the reality is not just where its instincts are self-reinforced.
No, destiny is just the confirmation of long term of predictability of things, specially human behavior.
I believe that the idea of god may be useful but the mythological crap is just the over-dominance of artistic/metaphorical narrative into society.
JESUS CHRISTUS HELP ME
”most males ARE NOT hgilyhg creatuf”
”For each ”5” geniuses of masculine pop we much more criminals, from the bottom of society to the top.”
[redacted by pp, Jan 3, 2019]. This is not true.
”This is not true”
no**
geniuses are super rare
criminals are not so rare
most criminals are males
take it
Thats different from what you said earlier santo
Also most of the criminals are men yes, but they do it for socio-economic reasons.
huge hiatus WITH absolute…
Also Illuminaticat and Thinking Mouse are the same person.
no they’re not
Hahaha. Thats such a bad judgement its unbelievable.
Illuminaticat,Animekitty, and thinking mouse are all the same person.
Illuminaticat/Animekitty share no identity with thinking mouse.
mouse is east Asian, I (cat) am northern European 1/4 native American.
我不是东亚人!
LOADED>>>>>Donald Trump.
Fuvk you all, long live King LOADED.
King meLo****
Ayyyy!
Ayyy yourself my nig.
More contemptible filth from afro.
He’s not Afro.
My readers are really bad at judging identity. I’m starting to think that most of my readers are on the autism spectrum, with pill & mug of pee being the most extreme cases.
“with pill & mug of pee being the most extreme cases”
hahaha