The other day I listened to a beautiful interview with Susan Orlean on CBC radio about libraries and all they meant to her growing up. As a child, the primary way Orlean bonded with her mother was going to the library.
Sadly her mother would get dementia causing all those precious memories to fade.
Especially before the internet, a library stored the culture’s memories, much like the human brain stores our individual memories, so Orlean would see the tragic burning of Los Angeles Central Library in 1986 as a metaphor for her mother’s dementia.
You can listen to the full interview here.
so iirc [redacted by pp, dec 3, 2018] are slightly more likely to be incarcerated.
and i know that [redacted by pp, dec 3, 2018] in prison doesn’t mean the same thing.
it’s fine if a girl doesn’t dig [redacted by pp, dec 3, 2018].
but no digging [redacted by pp, dec 3, 2018] is not the same as wanting to go down on girls.
You redacted this to the point it wasnt even worth publishing it.
i’ve consumed an entire bottle of ardbeg tonight. not as peaty as i expected. totally abuse-able.
have you ever considered that AIDS was worth it?
nothing really matters.
anyone can see.
nothing really matters.
nothing really matters to me…
[redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]…
the make-up was thick to cover the KS.
Pumpkin has seen the light. Praise Oprah.
I think if they polled the following 3 communities you would see the autist schiz spectrum and its relevance to actual reality: Science Nerds, Random persons from the public and conspiracy theory ‘nuts’. The questions they would ask should be:
1. Is race an optical illusion/genetic.
2. Does the president or national leader on tv actually make the political decisions of a country?
3. Do blacks bring crime?
4. Are women into ‘sexist pigs’?
5. Does gender exist.
6. Is academia brainwashing.
On this little poll, you would get most ‘science nerds’ agreeing with the conventional wisdom than even the random person from the street. I promise you. In fact I might even do an informal poll someday among people i know.
On this little poll, you would get most ‘science nerds’ agreeing with the conventional wisdom than even the random person from the street. I promise you.
You would get more educated people in general agreeing with conventional wisdom, not science nerds only. If you asked those questions to social science PhDs, they would be even more politically correct than science nerds.
Well said…
1. Is race an optical illusion/genetic.?
no
2. Does the president or national leader on tv actually make the political decisions of a country?
no
3. Do blacks bring crime?
yes
4. Are women into ‘sexist pigs’?
yes
5. Does gender exist.
yes
6. Is academia brainwashing.
yes
The amount of people that believe the president runs the country really exemplifies why the national IQ dropped from 103 at its peak to its current 98.
Mikey unsuprisngly gets all the right answers. Mikey is the most honest black person possibly in human history.
1.
Yes, Its an colour pallet with some Holes in it.
2.
No.
3.
Ceteris paribus (as far as i know) they trend to commit 2-3x more violent crime, why im not entierly sure. There might be factors that im not controling for though. I generally dont like looking at independent effects in complex interactive models, but can accept studies looking into independent effects as an way to inspire future research about constelations of variables. Other types of crime have blacks do less per capita.
4.
Theres an epistatic effekt. It doesnt have an independent effect on attractieness, in some cases its negative, especially when we talk about degrees of sexism.
5.
Retarded semantics.
6.
For most people, so id say “yes”.
You cheated and looked at Mikeys answers first before answering.
No the true way of cheating is reading your prior comments.
So you admit you cheated.
Well, you belive that individuals belief in ideology has some effect on physiognomy so “cheating” wouldnt invalidate the test as its intended to test physiognomy.
Also i didnt awnser all of the questions correct so its seems wierd that id cheat to only get an half good score.
1. Race as a concept is subjective. People still differ genetically and physically by conventional categories of geographic ancestry
2. Of course not.
3. Most poor migrants of any ethnicity have a predisposition for crime, ceteris paribus.
4. Women are into confidant and intelligent men who can please the sexually. These traits are not always mutually exclusive to being a sexist pig
5. Obviously. What kind of question is that?
6. Short answer, yes. Longer answer, not in the way you think it is. Even though I am a capitalist, I believe it has ruined academia. secondly, anyone could possibly use science as a means to a political end. Both sides of the spectrum are guilty of this.
“Women are into confidant and intelligent men who can please the sexually. These traits are not always mutually exclusive to being a sexist pig”
That seems better than my awnser. The thing is that i think sexism sometimes can allude to fake (but appearing as true) confidence, though i suspect it would be negatively correlated to confidence.
As I said 2 years ago. Science nerds look ugly, aesthetically because they actually are a type of retard.
Good looks correlate with social intelligence and ‘common sense’ intelligence way more than being able to differentiate a natural log function in your head.
One can be considered both nerdy looking and very attractive.
Keep telling yourself that puppy.
Nice try. But i don’t have a dog in this fight. I’m a freak not a geek.
On average nerds might be ugly but lots of exceptions.
no.
a woman can be a nerd (to an extent) and still be sexy. but i hate timid, mousy, japanese type women. just gross.
if by “look like a nerd” is meant not dressing and grooming oneself in a fashionable manner, then peepee is right. but that’s not what pill means.
pill is referring to the ways people look which is BEYOND THEIR CONTROL.
So he’s talking about ugly people then, not necessarily nerds.
Nerds are a kind of savantism. I was way uglier when i was a teen nerd. But i was always into conspiracy stuff even as a straight A student. This meant women still found me attractive despite being a pliant idiot.
Philosopher/puppyperson
The very instinctive 19th century Europeans didnt manage to stop african population growth nor Zion. They had every opportunity.
I mean cmon, they had no environmental concerns, were 30% of the global population, had around 80% of industrial output, an minimalist education system with an focus to productivity an national sovereignty. Had armies that numbered in the tens of millions, had complete naval supremacy. Owned almost all valuable land outside of south and east Asia, where they still dominated in trade. It seems like white people are never going to return to that, yet you stay optimistic?
What was the domestic flaw? I recall you saying it is that the gradual conning from Zion that made euros never notice it, but i dont buy that, becuase Zion had been attacked in imperial Russia and Wilhem was anti Zion. So you think they conquered the Anglos and Soviets, working as middlemen in both societies? That would make sense.
“So you think they conquered the Anglos and Soviets, working as middlemen in both societies? That would make sense.”
Yes. But the way they conquered the anglos and Russians is a pretty awesome example of why they rule the world today. Both presented unique challenges in terms of pre existing culture, education and existing Master overclasses.
One thing I always openly admit is that jews are more intelligent than gentiles of either germanic or slavic persuasion. This is obvious to me.
“and existing Master overclasses.”
Didnt you say that the British elite was superior in intelligence? Why wouldnt they or The French manage to understand the implications despite their advesrcaries (including the USSR with stalins “doctors plot”) being open about it?
“One thing I always openly admit is that jews are more intelligent than gentiles of either germanic or slavic persuasion. This is obvious to me.”
Dont you think larger population and better education would render the european elite smarter?
Hoiw did it happen in those countries? Give us an history lesson…
Also who is this ‘philosopher’ you keep mentioning.
This dude:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_II,_German_Emperor#Anti-England,_anti-Semitic,_and_anti-Free_Mason_Views
Puppy what is a ‘freak’. I wont a detailed picture.
God the comments underneath this.
This is why jews rule the west. People are so fucking retarded. And i dont mean in that they are ‘racist’ ‘rednecks’ who voted for trump like my weekly jewish media download told me. I mean the opposite, that they never question what they look at.
And so, ive been thinking about why its so easy to fool people which I will discuss later.
Bill Gates has a pronounced humpback. Look at it. Its from being at a computer too long.
Theres a rumour that Obama is gay and it names this black dude as one of his lovers. Im not sure I buy that. Hilary being lesbian is a lot more realistic to me and has waaay more evidence going for it. Namely Bill Clinton admitted it to Miss Arkansas in bed with her.
look at the douche on rogan today, Dr. Ben Goertzel. i didn’t listen i just saw how he looked and knew he had nothing interesting to say. yet he may have a high IQ. he’s a brazilian jew on his third marriage.
long hair + hat indoors + hat with pattern + shirt with printed pattern = UN-Cynic = retard.
i wonder how jewish he really is. he looks part brownzilian.
pill adds SMV to IQ. this follows from “aesthetics don’t lie.”
i do know that even if they may sometimes lie, they do say more about a person than just how good looking he is.
and “aesthetics” includes taste.
SMV = sexual market value
as with intelligence, SMV is NOT one dimensional, despite the wishes of psychologists.
in general people are matched for everything. physical appearance, IQ, class, etc.
contrary to popular opinion: stupidity is a boner shrinker.
Theres several archetypes in sexyness, not only one.
the way it works is:
there’s a concrete reality of attraction and then there’s all the stories people tell themselves about why she’s so or he’s so attractive.
men say to themselves: “she’s so good looking.”
women say: “he’s so good looking but he it’s ‘really’ his personality.”
the reality is wiser than it’s analysis.
humans are slaves to nature.
attraction is a master.
the superman is attractive to all and attracted to none.
except dogs.
Whats the deal with dogs? I cant connect the dots…
It sounds like you say that dogs live in an life not obfuscated by human pathologies, since they cant use their brains to bullshit themselves about life, but still are smart enough to have an spirit, but also are very optimal in other emotional processes that inform their intelligence and give them an proclivity to live an Cynic lifestyle. You also like them becuase they were bred to be beautifull by Cynic humans? and therefore approach an archetype that most people dont realise fully, thus [redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
concrete reality vs abstractions an example:
how many women get boob jobs?
the ideal female physique is not flat chested, but it’s not dolly parton either. and the shape is important. size by itself is meaningless.
dick size should be more important to women than boob size is to men.
but then you never hear people talk about the vulva. or about penis beauty.
some vulvas are a lot better looking than others.
and now women are having labia reduction surgery imagining that men just want a slit like a butt down there. it’s not the most attractive. but there are some out of control labia minora.
…
but this is just porn talk. only gay men can bitch about the beauty of their partner’s genitals. that’s how un-free sex is in the post-savage world.
the ideal vulva is a slight hypertrophy of normal and symmetric.
it’s the same for dicks, i imagine.
peepee claims to be “prole”.
yet peepee is not from a white trash background, because she’s not white.
and she’s from an urban background.
urban is better than rural.
but suburban is better than both.
in terms of IQ.
generally.
I was just agreeing with your characterization of me because I don’t care much about social class.
I’m probably not prole on my German side. My great-grandfather for example was an eminent professor of languages.
Whats the other side? Trinidadian?
the multi-dimensional class system in the US is impossible for a canadian shitholer immigrant to understand.
in the mother country, blighty, it is possible to be poor AND upper class at the same time.
it’s RARE, but it happens.
in the US it’s even rarer. it probably doesn’t exist.
but ultimately, just like aesthetics…
class doesn’t lie.
you talk. i talk. we know.
is class just money + time?
probably.
but it seems like something CONCRETE.
when you talk to people.
THE YUGE POINT IS…
THE IDEAL SOCIETY IS ONE WHERE EVERYONE HAS THE MANNERS AND DICTION OF THE BRITISH UPPER CLASS…
REALLY!
IS BLIGHTY TOO POOR TO AFFORD THAT?
IS AM-BLIGHTY TOO POOR?
READ IT AND GROK:
here’s another picture of a must read book.
in 1850 the british aristocracy were the richest and the most powerful “group” on earth.
not anymore.
Ill add this to my reading list.
I would add that people hire social class more than qualifications in most of the organisations ive gone to. Even the most meritocratic process, which was the public sector organisation i initially joined after college, still had some biases towards people of higher social class. That said I imagine the grad scheme had more northerners (who are seen as lower class in the UK) than other graduate schemes in canary wharf.
On the question of whether people should be allowed to discriminate on social class…..theres no easy answer. At the end of the day a lot of workplaces are like social clubs. If you don’t belong, you’ll be alienated….so best to join birds of the same flock unless you have some sort of overriding financial reason.
#1 son rule for black women and the rest…
STOP FUCKING WITH YOUR HAIR.
IF YOUR WORLDVIEW DOESN’T INCLUDE OBESE BUCK-TOOTHED RETARDED WHITE PEOPLE, THEN…
YOU’RE AN OBESE BUCK-TOOTHED RETARDED WHITE PERSON.
the difference between a nerd in the pejorative/pill sense and a nerd in other non-hateful senses is that the other nerd is a SAVAGE manque.
if you can’t imagine yourself as a savage, then…
SENTINEL ISLAND KILLS YOU.
china people and europe people are superior to all others because cold climate…
says flushton.
but how dumb would they have to be not to think, “i’m cold. i should move south.”?
i make a point of not eating pork, because pigs are smart and because they’re usually treated horribly in the US.
but i would feel ZERO remorse in killing a boar on a desert island. ZERO.
i mean maybe for a moment.
white dudes took black music and IMPROVED it!
listening to this it’s no wonder the british empire was a quarter of the earth…plus.
you have to be a motherfucker to sing that way.
white man sexy and black man sexy are different creatures.
the SQ is just as bullshit as the IQ.
but there is no yellow man sexy. it doesn’t exist.
mercury
morrison
daltrey
these are so obvious all other lead vocalists SUCK in the rock genre.
my fav of that indian/persian fag is…you know already…
mercury was TRULY GREAT!
white men want him to give them AIDS!
Just finished watching downfall, a movie I would heartily recommend.[redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
Im wrong puppy. I have no problem saying one of my conspiracy theories according to the above evidence is wrong. [redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
The movie is one of the best i’ve ever seen by the way. The acting is superb. I thought the one thing which was a bit naff was to use the blond children throughout the movie to symbolise ‘aryans’. Of course the Nazi regime was very explicit about race and background. The opening scene shows how Hitler picked his secretary based on her being from Bavaria. This woman was actually still alive up until a few years ago and speaks before and after the movie about how she was so young and idealistic. Its a very intense film.
I would have guessed Puppy had germanic ancestry. Puppy knows where I live so he can probably guess that im related to the ‘eternal’ white thrash tribe of western europe and its more than likely where i get my tribalism from actually.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_trash
This is an article on white thrash. What it doesn’t mention is that most white thrash americans in the south were of scots-irish descent, or basically the same ‘breeding pool’ that donald trumps mother, who actually spoke scots gaelic as her first language.
If they actually drew the link you could then see why Ireland and Scotland were and are, respectively, the basket cases of western europe.
One of the lines in the article mentions a weakness to alcohol.
This is something native americans also have. And it may be related to not being as domesticated as say, southern english people or other germanics.
Cults 2
The other aspect of brainwashing I wanted to mention was that in my opinion it has less to do with whether you are smart of not and much more to do with what puppy calls Badcocks model ‘the autist-schiz’ spectrum or basically the domesticated and undomesticated human being.
People of the highest IQs actually usually follow the conventional wisdom on morality because the centres of learning, universities and so forth are usually controlled by the cult directly. This is the case historically in all human cultures. The cult controls the centres of learning and the parasites perpetuate themselves by inducting potential competitors into the cult more wholeheartedly.
This gets broken up by the invention of rationalism and science where people for the first time are given license to see reality and not what Rabbi Tim Wise says and most importantly FEEL GOOD ABOUT QUESTIONING IT AND NOT THINK ITS EVIL TO QUESTION.
Anyways, with ‘the scientific method’ you suddenly allow cult members to produce knowledge thats not sanctioned by the priests (I use the term priest loosely – in modern western societies its synonymous for ‘journalist’ or ‘talk show host’). And thats how the west kind of is very different to everything that went before and indeed what came to replace it in the 1960s [redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
Its possible that Weber is right that protestant calvinism was the exact right hue of bullshit to allow rationalism to flower and it wouldn’t have worked if say a warrior religion was there. What is obvious is that those nations that adopted calvinism and those that stuck with catholicism say very diverging paths despite the catholic empires like Spain and Italy starting off much further in resources, land, power and discoveries in the civilisation race.
The swedish kingdom could accumalate an army half of that of spains during the 30 years war. Infact the Danish and Swedish kingdoms outpaced the entire Iberia having an an population 5x larger than the scandinavian kingdoms, and the Spanish empire arounf 13x times more people. The thirty years war was truly something…
Questions
Is it better to be brainwashed (as far as i can tell, its better to be brainwashed from a mental health, social standing and economic standpoint).
Will science destroy cults? (Not that i can see).
[redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
Is it human to believe in fairy tales (yes, and if you don’t believe in any ideology you are probably a psychopath of some sort).
^^ Enjoy all that before anti-psychotics reduce me to posting pictures of naked black men as they turn my brain into mush.
One thing Ill talk about later is how cults treat people who are ‘undesirables’ or ‘untouchables’ – i.e. people with genetic, intellectual, sexual or mental health deficiencies – and how their treatment of ‘the freaks’ effects society.
I am a freak.
Probably more than what puppy admits to above.
Im starting to get bored of playing video games all day. Its amazing how Ive come to this point. I blame puppy.
Always have a plan b, anc c, and d. But thats about all you need 😉
Everyone knows Lindsay Graham is homosexual. His dog probably knows. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual. I just defined veryone knows as everyone. So why dont americans get that hes homosexal. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual. So why do most americans not get that hes homosexual.
Puppy person should do slam poetry.
HOMOSEXUALITY IS A ____
(Jew) Something to be celebrated
(Normal Man) Weird
(Religious Person) Sin
(Santo) Part of evolution
Hmmmm
Hard to figure this one out.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/yougov-poll-homosexuality-half-young-people-10458032.html
Awnser: (Santo) Part of evolution
Also the normal man alternative is congruent with the other alternatives.
Homosexuality is not different by definition
Before birth, the hypothalamus is exposed to estrogen (gay male) or testosterone (gay female)
Kitty,my definition is only a (bad) joke
National Geographic explains the biology of homosexuality
begins at 00:50
I think that’s more of a liberal thing to tolerate hosexuality
the difference between doing evil and being evil is…
someone may do evil thinking they are doing good or may do evil in the service of a greater good. that someone is not evil.
an evil person does evil for his own (individual, personal, etc.) gratification.
hitler was not evil in this sense.
[redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]
You still haven’t defined what evil is. Your definition is circular since it includes the word you’re defining.
it’s not circular at all fucktard.
dumass shitholer!
“evil” is a noun and an adjective. it is an adjective applied to deeds and events and to people.
in my title “what does ‘evil’ mean?” i am referring to the adjectival use for a person.
LEARN ENGLISH!
“A fat person is a person with fat”
-the wit & wisdom of mug of pee
fat is a noun and an adjective.
fat as noun is an essential nutrient.
fat people…
they can be cool or disgusting.
but if you’re not a professional sumo fat is not cool.
NOTHING REALLY MATTERS TO ME…
[redacted by pp, dec 5, 2018]labeling hitler “evil” is way to distract the 99% from the inherent evil of anyone or small group having as much power as hitler had.
afaik there is zero evidence that hitler was a bad person. that is, he loved animals and didn’t molest children and treated his subordinates with kindness.
it’s a horrible reality…maybe…but folks like hitler and stalin who come from nothing…they’re charming…people LIKE them…maybe once they’re in power they turn into cunts…but i doubt it.
the best explanation for hitler and stalin is they were sincere, committed ideologues and they were charismatic, like-able, charming people…and they weren’t faking…they were just being themselves…honest.
hitler was from austria so he may have had an accent.
stalin was from georgia he DID have a YUGE accent.
nerds imagine that bill gates in another life could have been napolean…
nein meine herren!
it’s a totally different thing…politics.
you have to have charisma.
nixon had no charisma but his super high IQ doesn’t explain his success.
he was LUCKY that ike picked him.
look at shoe’s and unz’s hagiography of feynman.
and shoe’s hagi of so many physicists.
THIS IS NOT THE BEHAVIOR OF THOSE WHOSE FIELD IS USEFUL..NOT!…IT’S LIKE THE BOOSTING OF PHILOSOPHERS…
so you wonder…maybe theoretical physics is mostly bullshit?
so now girls under 30 make more than boys and girls are more likely to graduate from college.
yet girls bitch about the scarcity of good men.
girls obey.
my two majors were 50/50 males and lesbians. math and chemistry.
but girls hate physics and engineering. hate.
but they’re down with finance and accounting iirc.
norm’s answer to the gay issue is…
THEY’RE STRAIGHT.
A bit OT but I have a question that perhaps a commenter can answer. Anyone here ever taken the self-scoring IQ test authored by the late Victor Serebriakoff? Just curious as to how accurate the scores might be. I see that the publishing date was 1996 so not sure how or if this would distort the results significantly. Many reviewers claim their scores on it matches their WAIS score. Thanks