Long before Ellen, Will & Grace or Modern Family, it was Oprah (and before her Donahue) and the genre of TV she popularized, that played the critical role bringing gays into the mainstream. Here she is way back in 1989 (before most of my readers were even born) discussing gay marriage.
Oprah really is the most influential woman in the World because virtually no single living person has done more to change the culture of America, and by extension, the World. It sounds bad to say now, but back in the 1980s people weren’t used to seeing a black looking black woman on TV. What few black celebs there were, were often mixed race or skin bleached, so to see an authentic dark skinned black woman with African features on TV was transformative. One Oprah fan told me that she didn’t watch for years because she thought “she is black, what kind of show can she have?” A TV station told the legendary King brothers (Oprah’s syndicators) that they could get a better rating with a potato than by putting a black woman on TV.
But if being overweight and hardcore black wasn’t taboo enough, Oprah shocked the world by discussing topics as forbidden as gay marriage, infidelity, food addiction, and above all, sexual abuse, leading millions of victims to recovery.
Even though at age three, Oprah was a preacher prodigy, raised to believe gays would go to hell, she slowly abandoned this dogma for a more inclusive spirituality that millions of her fans embraced.
A preacher at the age of 3
She was smart enough to know that as an overweight dark skinned black woman, she faced discrimination in the same way gays did, and with 20th century nutrition increasing the World’s brain size and IQ, an awakened public would soon embrace moral progress, causing gay suicide rates to plummet.
As Martin Luther King once observed, the arch of the moral universe is long, but bends towards justice.
Like all revolutionary leaders, Oprah got on the right side of history, way ahead of her time, just as she had with the Iraq war:
Pumpkin Person 
oprah is patient zero for hiv. she gave it to the chimp who gave it to gaetan dugas.
I had a light skinned Afro-multiracial professor who made us watch the musical about Patient Zero (perhaps at the behest of her flaming gay male TA) for film class. It was like a gay porn. We also watched another movie that had nothing to do with gays, but when the camera focused on the face of a blond blue eyed guy, she said it was homo erotica (because gays like Nordic guys?)
more trolling.
there was no musical about patient zero. what a disgusting idea.
yes there is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Patience
1. notice the color matching.
2. notice the camaraderie.
it’s a double tragedy. first was the psychiatric tragedy of the compulsion to sodomize or be sodomized. then was the tragedy of a fatal illness, a long lasting and wasting illness, not like a heart attack or typhus. more like tb.
200+ sexual partners per year was the average for the first cases. not 200+ sexual acts but sexual acts with 200+ different people.
what they did was evil, but the only victim was themselves. very weird.
they were possessed with the demon of sodom.
Since 2007 repeating shitself….
i’ve finally figured it out. peepee whole blog is just a giant troll. one day after pill figured it out and peepee hid his comments.
causing gay suicide rates to plummet
when peepee doesn’t know the facts she just makes them up. misdreavus knows because he’s a homo.
billionaires who actually have opinions and aren’t brainwashed would never give interviews today. one un-pc statement and they lose a lot. only billionaires like carl icahn whose billions are very liquid can say what they think.
I saw a Microsoft research video on language and personality.
People that use “I, he, she, they” are more socially oriented / more story driven.
People that use a class of words called “functional words” are more analytical.
So two kinds of thinking exist socially oriented / more story driven and analytical.
—————–
Here is a diagram of what the different brain regions do.
By Dario Nardi – unrelated to Microsoft research.
My mom is mentally delayed. I asked her psychiatrist. She told me so. I notice how she does not understand what I say and is not interested. She lacks curiosity.
I almost had a girlfriend in 2009. I was unable to see her because my mom would not take me to the picnic party at the park.
I have high verbal and perceptual IQ but low processing speed. The wais-4 is meant to be a diagnostic tool. Accordingly, I should meet the criteria for a non-verbal learning disorder. And this means my brain should be different.
Looking into personality types the closest fit for me is INFP. This type is one of the most philosophical types and “True too self” types. They want to find the meaning in life that hides behind a dark world.
I can’t believe children were exposed to such a hateful cartoon. In France, the teacher would be in jail for showing that.
Maybe Oprah being attracted to woman helped her escape her family social conservative values coupled with being a media executive independently of IQ.
I didn’t know that 77% of English were against the war and yet they would be heavily involved. It’s a good point for
France that we didn’t let us involved in this and has to suffer USA bullying. Villepin attacking the USA in the ONU was unprecedented for an occidental country at that time.
And it’s not like we don’t have a very huge Ashkenazim influence here …
Maybe Oprah being attracted to woman
G-man thinks she’s lesbian. Her biographers dismiss that as a silly rumor that started in the late 90s . I’m agnostic.
I didn’t know that 77% of English were against the war and yet they would be heavily involved. It’s a good point for
France that we didn’t let us involved in this and has to suffer USA bullying.
Not only did France have the good sense to oppose the war, but French Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien kept Canada out of the war too. So the French saved two countries from that war! At the time some Americans were so disgusted with the French that they renamed French fries “Freedom fries”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_fries
Ahead of her time, less about eighties fashion style…
Debate about prejudice is very old, sorry Pugkin!!
RR,
“Researchers found that a small variation, involving only a single different molecule in its string of DNA, on a gene called HMGA2 on chromosome 12 can alter IQ by as much as 1.29 points and can also increase the overall volume of the brain by 0.58 percent of the average brain size.”
https://www.medicaldaily.com/breakthrough-discovery-links-tiny-genetic-variations-brain-size-iq-and-disorders-240146
Maybe IQ genes are an smaller share of the total genome than hieght genes are.
I guess meLo might like this as well.
Eh, any action that requires thought is influenced by the variation of genes involving brain development.
The article is kind of old and at this point I’m more interested in cognition and consciousness as a whole.
maybe santo is becoming a genuine leftist like pill and me.
fake leftist: we need a trans black jew president.
genuine leftist: we need canadian health care, ubi, an end to college loans, etc.. trans is a mental illness much like [redacted by pp, sept 16, 2018]
A genuine stupid who believe in sides??
Not really, leftism is a jewish thing, i never will follow some jewish creation, sorry!
Only the Jewish diaspora is leftwing & only on social issues. Israel is super duper rightwing.
You’re only left on economic issues.
You’re a moderate on foreign policy & a low IQ racist homophobe on social issues
Not a genuine leftist one… majority of jewish mafia is fake about almost thing they push for goym to believe. Even when they prove their ”communist consciousness”, the irreflexive continuity of jewish tribe and perverse overuse of anti-semitism as an emotional tactic are mostly untouchable among them.
No there a single honest leftist jew who are if not against its own tribe at least critical in the same level majority of white liberals are. Even the most honest leftist jew you eventually can find, still will be less, in this fundamental aspect, than white liberals/leftists.
Genuine leftism, at least, never was absolutely anti-white, otherwise, it was just like a dictatorship but from the left or jacob-bin side.
New leftism is a combination of both communist tactics in many different fronts: international revolution but via cultural hegemony. But it’s not to make proletarians equal to their burgeioise patrons but to make them exceptionally ignorant and servant, eliminating the middle class. In other words, it’s all about power and capitalism using socialism against itself, and the master minds of this extreme evilness everyone with a healthy mental immune system know who are.
I hate it when people state mental ilness as it is an thing that is rigid or has to be solved. Its just cuase and effect (with probabilities), the rest is subjective opinion.
Puppy why are you doing a parody of yourself? Let me do your parodies please. Its disrespectful.
I don’t think this is a parody. None of Pumpkin’s articles are. His posts are always well-informed.
Oprah studies
america can only be saved by a blind and deaf trans black jewish woman with one leg.
Do you mean a continent??
HBD sumo questions:
1. why is takayasu so hairy? his dad is japanese and his mom is filipino, but filipinos aren’t hairy…unless they’re part spanish…a teeny tiny percentage of filipinos. (takayasu is still in the running half way through the september basho.)
2. of the last 87 yushos, 78 have been won by mongolians. mongolia has a population of only 3m. why are there no chinese or koreans in the makuuchi? mongolia is a poor country, but so is most of china, and there are at least as many giant chinese as giant mongolians.
is it that the chinese and the japanese hate each other? and the koreans hate everyone?
asians HATE diversity in asia. but they rove it in baizuo countries.
also interesting regarding filipinos is how well they do in the US.
pinkermartin explained this as … almost all of them are actually chinese filipinos.
not my experience. chinese are maybe 15% of thailand’s population but US filipinos are…almost none of them are chinese.
i assume that chinese are like 1% of filipinos.
i just saw a picture of myself. i thought, “wow. i look like that guy with super high t women want when they’re ovulating, but otherwise go with the mr rogers type.”
Poor boy…
one claim of duesberg (who was a genuinely distinguished scientist, not just a scientist) has been proven…
AIDS has not affected african demographics as it was predicted it would.
duesberg’s theory explains why the high risk groups are high risk. this includes all of the 4H. it doesn’t explain why HAART works.
that nobel laureate mullis and nobel candidate duesberg are denialists shows how important freedom of speech and freedom to speak without consequences is important.
the first amendment was radical in its day. it should be even more radical.
private punishment of opinion, however hateful, is evil.
how important freedom of speech and freedom to speak without consequences is
important.FREEDOM is a empty word, in its pure concept, liberty is basically anarchy, the correct is RESPONSIBILITY of speech, something only MATURE people seems have.
freedom of speech is important.
freedom to speak without any consequence is nonsense.
more juvenile englishman jive — all actions have consequences.
no one should be fired, not hired, not admitted, expelled, not promoted, banned from social media, etc. because of what he thinks. it may be he will be disliked, but that’s it.
the only vocalizations and other communications for which there should be consequences of the above type are threats and nuisances. as soon as social media platforms start editing they are open to all manner of law suits.
What about freedom of association.
Why should I not be allowed to ban people from my social media accounts?
Why do retards cry “freedom of speech” when people remove comments on their own videos because of harassment.
no one should be fired, not hired, not admitted, expelled, not promoted, banned from social media, etc. because of what he thinks.
No one is fired for thinking anything. They are fired for conduct.
Give me a break. 95% of getting a job is whether “you’ll fit in around here.” Once you out yourself as not ‘fitting in,’ don’t be surprised if you get fired.
95% of getting a job is whether “you’ll fit in around here.”
for once you agree with me you dumbass guinea.
italians and italian americans who aren’t down with alfred rosenburg are suspicious.
why?
1. because until about 1500 italy was still the center of the world. not figuratively or nostalgically or chauvinistically or whatever…REALLY…
banking was actually invented by italian gentiles.
2. they are the only remaining “white ethnic” in the US…so they hate WASPs. and all the movies promoting them are about criminals. (they should be proud of that! as crime goes…the italians make an art of it.)
3. stand up straight!
italy will save the EU or it will not be saved.
we all want a pope who’s a MAN. the whole world wants rome to lead.
do it faggots!
He love italian men…
”People who love footbal or socker tend to be TRASH”
the first amendment was radical in its day. it should be even more radical.
No it wasn’t. The original intent was the narrow ‘freedom of speech’ from English common law.
The Alien and Sedition Acts, passed not long after ratification, are enough to silence any assertion that the original understanding of the first amendment was anything like the WARREN COURT’S interpretation of the first amendment.
LIE!
As a result of the jurisprudence of the Warren Court in the mid-to-late 20th century, the Court has moved towards a baseline default rule under which freedom of speech is generally presumed to be protected, unless a specific exception applies.
deal with it!
i agree.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts
What part of this act is about censorship? Theres the bit about saying false statements about the government. Notice it is not all statements. Many countries in wartime don’t allow that. It was during a war. What an idiot.
By that standard FDR was as bad as Hitler and Stalin because he had concentration camps too.
i almost said something similar.
libel and slander are civil matters. not criminal.
BUT in the US false statements about powerful people seriatim or “toto” are IGNORED.
because:
1. prosecuting such cases is very NOT economical.
2. government and government officials SHOULD be subject to withering abuse at all times.
swank’s right about that.
The Supreme Court declined to rule on the constitutionality of any federal law regarding the Free Speech Clause until the 20th century. For example, the Supreme Court never ruled on the Alien and Sedition Acts; three Supreme Court justices riding circuit presided over sedition trials without indicating any reservations.[49] The leading critics of the law, Vice President Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, argued for the Acts’ unconstitutionality based on the First Amendment and other Constitutional provisions.[50] Jefferson succeeded Adams as president, in part due to the unpopularity of the latter’s sedition prosecutions; he and his party quickly overturned the Acts and pardoned those imprisoned by them.[51] In the majority opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964),[52] the Court noted the importance of this public debate as a precedent in First Amendment law and ruled that the Acts had been unconstitutional: “Although the Sedition Act was never tested in this Court, the attack upon its validity has carried the day in the court of history.”[53][54]
the WARREN COURT. OPENLY STATING that it is NOT relying on original intent, but instead on the “court of history” i.e. “society.” Jefferson and Madison were in the MINORITY, in their day, regarding the first amendment.
muggy is wrong about the law because free speech.
madison is THE foremost authority on original intent.
do you even know when you’re lying? is it a tick? do you have tourette’s?
madison is THE foremost authority on original intent.
oh, is that why his interpretations of the constitution dominated early American jurisprudence? oh wait…that’s Alexander Hamilton through John Marshall.
the first amendment originally meant and was intended to mean something different.
NOPE!
just more (((lies))).
black’s interpretation was CORRECT.
AND it was not just “sexualist” it was also ORIGINAL INTENT!
DEAL WITH IT!
By Swanks idiot logic, internment camps for specific races are now legal.
Phil Donahue, Oprah’s predecessor and by all accounts the originator of the melodramatic talk show genre (his show had a 29-year run starting in the late ’60s), was an early and vocal opponent of military intervention in Iraq. So much so, that his gig at MSNBC was canceled just weeks before the actual invasion. Some might say that he wasn’t smart to harp (unlike the real Harpo) daily on the issue but, given that the invasion hadn’t yet taken place, he probably thought that this the was time to sway public opinion. (After the actual invasion, any opposition would be viewed as being against the troops.) Also, as an elderly man pushing 70, he probably figured he had little to lose.
Given that the Catholic sex abuse issue is in the news again, with some higher-ups asking the Pope himself to resign, it’s noteworthy that Donahue essentially introduced this issue to a national audience on his show in the 1980s. This was long before the issue blew up in the media in the early 2000s.
I didn’t know Donahue popularized that issue too. Good for him. He likely saved many kids from abuse.
Yes I remember. Donahue showed great courage & integrity during the run-up to war & before that, his daytime talk show paved the way for Oprah & the counterculture that followed. I rank him as the 34th most influential living person of all time:
Thanks Pumpkin!
You’re welcome 🙂
mullis and i have the same theory. except mine is total. his is just about science, or bio-science.
i would’ve thought…if you try to publish a dumb paper in a journal like Nature
(most prestigious journal) it won’t get published. but if you try to publish a good paper in there like i later tried to publish PCR, the invention of PCR, in the same journal (for which mullis won the nobel prize) then..uh..they didn’t take it.
up there. there isn’t an “up there” there. the academy of sciences is just a bunch of idiots just like everybody else. there are no old wise men up on the top making sure that we don’t do something really dumb.
https://archive.esquire.com/image/spread/19940701/36/thumb
Transsexualism is a perypheral mental DISORDER. All ilnesses are disorders, not all disorders which are ilnesses, there are, as always, a spectrum between contextual order and disorder.
BissexualiTY look like on the same parity with heterossexualISM..
So transexuality is weird, but being attracted to other men is fine. Gotcha.
Reading issues since 2010…
At least this man is not a loser schizopathic as you, it’s fine.
Next try, try think, i’m bored about your instincts being tossed here, this blog is becoming pneumonatic with your morbid immaturity.
What about people that like feet or exposing themselves in public? Can wise judge Santo rule on these categories please?
Or people who repeating itself, irrelevantly, thousand times in certain blog.
You and your boyfriend must thanks to Pugkin the space xe gave to you.
People that like feet already have civil rights. People who like exposing themselves in public are infringing on the rights of others and thus not comparable to gays.
Im not arguing about law puppy, im arguing about peoples thoughts on whether these things are icky.
Yes it’s icky. What’s your point?
SO you finally admit it. FINALLY.
Facts are not values
Values are what we decide to do it with a fact..
There are people who confuse value as an fact, often those on the leftilt side, and people who confuse fact as a value, often on the rightilt side.
Both wrong..
Since a one decade we have here two guys who commit this rightilt fallacy repeating it ad exhausting..
Does PP think like Santo the trans is a mental disorder like Santo does, if not explain?
Phil makes the distinction that gay and trans are both equally a mental disorder and not a mental disorder because of persons feeling ickiness towards both. Meaning that a mental disorder is a social construct (ickiness). Santo finds trans icky but not gays.
What is PP’s construct of mental disorder? (phil ags on about)
”Icky” your new favorite word.
”Does PP think like Santo the trans is a mental disorder like Santo does, if not explain?”
I don’t understand this… i explained…
”Phil makes the distinction that gay and trans are both equally a mental disorder and not a mental disorder because of persons feeling ickiness towards both.”
Pill arguments can summarized in just one: instincts, which’s wrong because instincts is a pre-determined answer without a question. Instincts are always a incomplete or insufficient reasoning for those who have reason.
Based on what MEDIOCRE people feel or think, majority of gifted people would be described as ill…
”Meaning that a mental disorder is a social construct (ickiness).”
It’s not, when the levels of disorder is not higher to be a nuclear [schizophrenia] or elementar [Alzheimer].
Nuclear mental disorder have higher levels of progressive deterioration of mental activity;
Elementar mental disorder [that affect consciousness or another fundamental aspect directly] have absolute levels of progressive deterioration of mental activity;
Perypheral mental disorder often no have any causal direct role on progressive deterioration of mental activity.
”Santo finds trans icky but not gays.”
I don’t find,
i find
– LUXURIOUS to argue ”muuuh, i was born in WRONG body”;
– Wasteless to dedicate a entire new sector of medicine [plastic surgery] to attend people’s misunderstood;
– Regressive because it’s imply on back to binnary thinking, the denial of androgyny..
And, personally i don’t find attractive a transsexual person.
“You’re a moderate on foreign policy & a low IQ racist homophobe on social issues”
Genuine question puppy. What do you think people who are not black/mixed raced, non autistic, and have an IQ >140 think about the world?
unless they’re a sociopath & few people above 140 are, they would agree that racism & homophobia are wrong, while still believing HBD & opposing immigration. They would support most civil rights for gays but possibly oppose gay adoption because it devalues the traditional family.
”oppose gay adoption because it devalues the traditional family.”
traditional family is devaluable itself since always, specially when fathers don’t understand their sons.
Any type of adoption, about humans or nonhuman living beings, must be responsible. It’s not because a couple is gay or not, that they can’t adopt if they want.
If the one of the couple have moral mental issues…
So you would be happy if someone with a known history of exposing themselves in public or was a transexual adopted one of your family members?
I just told you why I’m not okay with public exposure. Damn you’re dumb.
Then what about a transexual person adopting?
There are good, avg and evil transexual person, welcome to the sunlight pill, out of cave.
When you says that blacks on avg have lower adaptative skills to complex/perplex societies but there are valuable exception and that nothing is always permanent and/or can be changed, less about their fundamental or general behavioral/physical–elementar rules, and that individual charater matter, you’re saying the truth.
When you says that blacks ARE nonhuman monkeys, evil and dumb and whites ARE completely otherwise you’re more dramatically wrong than a mexican soap opera, even at least this last tend to be recreationally funny.
Lets use the example of religious christian Europe.
Were the priests in on it? Most of them no. They believed.
Were the barons and mid level lords in on it? No. But it suited them that people were docile anyway.
Were the kings/queens in on it? Some of them didn’t believe it and knew it was a sham.
The Pope? Sometimes it was obvious he knew the whole thing was a sham.
Theres a certain inertia which you are right to talk about. Once you brainwash kids in it – people like Martin Luther take different interpretations of said sham all of their own.
Its the same with this social justice stuff except the main difference is that social justice is argued to appeal to reason. When if you reason it out, its the opposite. Do most 6 major media corporation heads and executive producers know its a sham. Definitely. They know it like Stephen jay gould knows it. But they say it because it suits them. In israel, it doesn’t suit them. So they conveniently forget about it there.
It’s not brainwashing if it’s true. It’s education. Now if the media tried to push pedophilia, we would have rebelled, but they were able to sell us gay rights because that’s on the right side of moral progress, even if the motive for pushing it was tribal.
But because you’re a cold blooded pure evil psychopath, in your eyes all moral progress is brainwashing. Genuine morality is a concept your brain’s not wired to process. If we did an MRI scan the physical damage to your brain would be immediately obvious to forensic neurologists
In France, media and « intellectuals » pushed for paedophilia in the 70 and it worked. There were lots of declared paedophiles in TV. Only when women right and fight against rape had grown, there were unease with that theme. Now it’s the most evil crime (along with racism and certain wwii historical claims)
Would you have called me a psychopath for questioning the church 100 years ago?
Pill suffer from very basic problem most supposed-amorally people have… He promote amorality for other people but total morality for himself. It’s happen because most people tend to promote their own ideals, or subjective ideals. Conserfs often have subjective ideals which are similar to objective ideals, but because we are never totally objective, and primarily subjective/self, the best ideal we can build is between our truth and the given reality.
My example [the best way to explain things]
I’m homossexual, my subjective ideal would be to overpromote the good side of THIS MY FACET [because i’m not just homossexual] and because positivity look like a good way to overpromote a higher self-esteem [but with a lot of issues]. The problem is that homossexuality have a lot of huge issues, and we know that, primarily speaking, it’s a disorder, a perypheral, different than a schizophrenia, a nuclear mental disorder. The objective ideal would be ”i’m homossexual, homossexuality have a lot of challenges, at priori, it’s appear to be less risky try to be heterossexual = less discrimination/rested immunological psychological states or higher self esteem due less diary or permanent expectation of disrespect, less stupid judgments of others, less chances to get a STD… but, this is my facet, a very important one, maybe i can conciliate my world with this reality, without fight against this-myself, accepting the dark sides of homossexuality but also the good sides i can find [and yes, i have found.
Now if the media tried to push pedophilia, we would have rebelled, but they were able to sell us gay rights because that’s on the right side of moral progress, even if the motive for pushing it was tribal.
Jive.
They were able to sell us X because they were able to construct a narrative about X that appealed to the masses. That’s it. That’s all.
Using popular opinion to gauge ‘moral progress’ is like deciding which foods are healthy based on which ones children like the most.
And it’s not so simple as ‘it’s not brainwashing if it’s true.’
For instance, what is the REAL effect of teaching white and black americans about slavery?
The slave trade and the institution are both widely agreed upon historical facts. Yet, the effect of teaching these facts likely only reinforces the current racial hierarchy. How could one gain more esteem for a group of people that one’s own group enslaved fairly recently?
the Trilateral Commission – the nongovernmental policy group from which the Carter Administration was largely drawn – issued stern warnings in 1975 that there is too much democracy, in part due to the failures of the institutions responsible for “the indoctrination of the young.” On the right, an important 1971 memorandum by Lewis Powell, directed to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the main business lobby, wailed that radicals were taking over everything – universities, media, government, etc. – and called on the business community to use its economic power to reverse the attack on our prized way of life – which he knew well. As a lobbyist for the tobacco industry, he was quite familiar with the workings of the nanny state for the rich that he called “the free market.”
the only real “conspiracy” is that elites hate everyone who is not elite.
all conspiracies that have turned out to be true bear this out.
the US gov’t syphilis trials
the US gov’t digging up dead bodies to test radiation
the CIA’s brainstormed plan to hijack airliners and blame Cuba
US gov’t poisoning alcohol during prohibition
the CIA directly attempting to influence public opinion via assets in various media outlets
the US gov’t lying to get us involved in at least two of the three ‘almost wars,’ i.e. Vietnam and the Gulf War (recruiting false testimony no less)
more recent ones involve a big pharma company illegally promoting unsafe drugs, bribing doctors, etc and the fact that the US gov’t pays big $$$ for sports leagues/teams/athletes to be ‘patriotic.’
so yes, the brainwashing or attempted brainwashing and subjugation of the populace is real…but those doing it are doing it on behalf of ‘moral progress.’ they think they are doing god’s work.
the homo issue has been framed as a difference in attraction. but it’s also a difference in repulsion.
that is, if i were an effeminate man and found women unattractive i would still find the thought of gay sex repulsive…unless i was evil.
even famous gay married milo has said the same. “it feels wrong.”
it’s a perversion just like afro’s lifestyle.
”i would still find the thought of gay sex repulsive…unless i was evil.”
Perversion is you have a big brain but a schizoautist-like, petsociopath, it’s sad!!
All the time the same stupid thing.
First of all, nobody cares if you BELIEVE or WANT TO BE like that given reality.
Morally speaking, homossexuality have nothing wrong, it’s not a crime.
Factually speaking, it’s a perypheral disorder, if homossexuality was a legitimate disease, i would like to be cured, but not.
Again, the same repetition of failled subjective ideals passing as absolute [objective and subjective, dialogically well-harmonized].
I don’t want you normalize homossexuality in your head because your perspective of dar side of what homossexuality is, it’s not wrong, otherwise… the problem is, your perspective is not complete…
Higher consciousness is look for all elements of given reality, in the immediate now, to start to produce a good judgment.
In the ideal society, if this is absolutely desirable [existential depression or melancholy make hyper-eugenics look like frivolous], it’s no doubt certain disorders will be eliminated as homossexuality. But, i believe, in the another track, bissexuality is in the same pair of heterossexuality, and homoaffective feelings will persist even will become a common place because it’s rational don’t avoid affection between friends.
Another huge moral problem your infantile mind can get is
you attack homossexuality, attacking homossexual people, as if one is another.
A feature is not an individual.
I want goulds explanation for why evolution stopped 40000 years ago and only in humans. To me its easier to believe the world was created by god in 7 days than believing in a process called evolution, which is there for no reason, and stops suddenly never to work again on humans. The second story is more of a ghost story.
This is the best i could find, but maybe RR got some better links.
Just seen a first movie from Jim Cummings Thunder Road. The story of a well to do texan policeman who’s big problem is his 85 IQ coupled with an incredible energy. Narcism and cyclothymia are more of a consequence of him being crushed by all small puzzles life throw at him at that looks like mysteries, threats and injustice from his brain, than his being very handsome.
Great movie about the white under-average intelligence guy. It seems that it’s a new theme.
Do they actually state his IQ in the film or is it just an estimate on your part?
It’s an estimate. At no moment in the movie, they explicitly implied he was a « congenital » dumb but it shows obviously from the character behaviour. I don’t think the director had a theory but he must be good at observing people and he must have met many like that.
Measuring the head of the actor wouldn’t inform on the character IQ dear Philo.
Besides I don’t know where you found I was interested in peoples head size. That’s more of a Pumpkin interest. I am just annoyed in movie theater when people sitting behind me murmure against the bad luck they had and try to change their seats location 😉
The director read pumpkins blog and casted someone with a small head to fit the role bruno. Thats basic casting 101.
Bad luck, the is the director 🙂
I don’t know how big is his head, but he is quite good looking. People were commenting on his good face more than anything else here in Paris.
Interestingly the Variety crititcs interpret the character actions, not by his low IQ, but by white privilege (?!).
His black colleague is a much more accomplished person and with his black wife, helps the character a lot. He is not a typical magic negroe because he is on the same standing (or better) than his colleague. His motivation have more to do with being religious than truly In empathy. The variety critics doesn’t allude to him to throw his white privilege theory.
Bruno measured his head.
Can you imagine being related to a pornstar in your immediate family? In some countries in the middle east or south asia people would possibly hire a hitman to take out their daughter.
Meanwhile in jew controlled america women are encouraged to do porn and sleep with swamp monsters and ufos.
Same failled arguments since always…. incredible!!!
Was listening to scriabin and i thought of a good video i could do talking about various topics in politics, science, philosophy and of course psychology in a 2 min clip.
It would be a series of questions.
What explains why rain man is the worlds foremost philosopher?
What explains why the middle east is a battleground?
What explains why some people do certain actions more than others?
As you all know the answer it wouldnt be interesting to you. But id pose a series of these questions/paradoxes. If i actually said the answer it would mean [redacted by pp, sept 18, 2018]
The reason conservatives and liberals disagree on right and wrong so much is that different things make them feel (icky).
What makes conservatives feel icky does not make liberals feel icky.
What makes liberals feel icky does not make conservatives feel icky.
Thus moral disagreement.
If intelligence is adaptation or anything which helps to promote it, and specially anything which is mental, so why personality would not be part of intelligence**
Personality is our reactive mental system, personality disorders would be just like potential to ”lower” emotional/sensitive intelligence, in this case, more about balance than quantitative levels, even i believe personality, as part of mental system/intelligence, would be quantitative, because its supportive nature.
Quantity, at individual perspective, as a dimensional and or ”supporter” value and quality as the compositional and/or the behavioral value.
Quantity as space and quality as time/behavior/movement as well compositional because the way a given element is organized is always a behavior, a sensitive one too.
Santo’s attitude is so annoying:
your favorite new word
poor boy
Fuck: who taunts/denigrates people like this?
And he is surprised why I/others are rude to him. He’s rude first. Fucking get a clue Santo.
I am not rude, Santo is passive aggressive and it pisses people off.
There is no reason for Santo to be passive aggressive just because he can’t understand what I am saying. If he can’t understand then shut the fuck up. I am not the one being rude, You Fucking Are.
please limit your comments to comments on my comments.
Iluminattikitty,
i said ”poor boy” not about you, even you may believe it’s about you.
And yes, it was a observation but i think autists were mostly logical..
English is your mother tongue, appreciate the correct way to write it and if you want people bear attention about what you’re writing organize your thoughts. I don’t understand just one part of your comment, isn’t**
A lot of reading//emotional issues here.
Yes, this blog is not just like on secret garden.
Another thing Kitty,
If i was in the blog where there are haterfull people saying all homossexuals are horrible beings why or what i must be polite**
Yes, about you, i apologize you don’t deserve all this, sorry!
there are only two non-low IQ reasons to moderate comments.
1. the comments aren’t comments but advertisements.
2. the comments reveal the identity of someone including the commenter himself.
3. if a commenter is making “so” many comments like that mongolian AG at shoe’s blog or like myself at this blog on occasion. but then such a commenter might merely have his comment count clipped. he shouldn’t be banned.
n/a is the ONLY blogger who got this and he was a “heritage american” like me.
coincidence?
if a blogger deviates from the above his blog is a fraud and he’s a stalinist cunt. unfortunately people like n/a and me and madison are much less than 1% of the population and even less outside the US.
but i agree with pill that concentration of media ownership needs govt action.
#3 is the main reason i moderate you & pill. You just keep repeating the same opinions over & over again.
You also alienate other commenters & might potentially alienate the experts i rely on for my research.
Only the first part – that which focuses on tragedy and epic (as a quasi-dramatic art, given its definition in Ch 23) – survives. The lost second part addressed comedy.
eco was accounted the world’s second greatest living intellectual by one publication. https://foreignpolicy.com/2005/10/15/prospectfp-top-100-public-intellectuals-results/
now for great moments in sumo.
fast forward to 5:00.
japan is a very man-ly country.
Gosh
he love watch fatty males flirting one each other…
weird.
gym rats like rr and swank may scoff at sumos. i would too…
except…
1. i expect sumos really are near powerlifter strength in the legs.
2. sumo does require skill and very fast reaction time and circus level balance. the fattest guy doesn’t always win.
3. sumos aren’t actually that fat compared to american football offensive linemen. a sumo of over 400 lbs is rare.
At Nuremberg he was sentenced to death and executed by hanging for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
crimes against humanity vs heroic acts FOR humanity. which was it?
master tells blaster to promote gayness, anti-roman-ism, and bodybuilding.
arnold’s father was SS. NOT a joke. he was a literal nazi. but arnold hated his father.
that rr and swank want arnold inside them is very telling.
italians want to be recognized as aryans…in the US and the EU.
they were so recognized by the nazis. ABSOLUTELY.
the EU is an anti-democratic organization led by germans who have been brainwashed by jews.
germans and brits and vikings are like the autistic children of italians and greeks and conquistadors who hate their parents…
but for no good reason.
And what’s the point of promoting gays? To genocide the white race by brainwashing them into not breeding?
i’ll respond when you admit you ARE a black woman.
No, its to normalise weirdness and social discord.
It won’t stop with the gays, or the trannies, or the public exposers, or the pimps or the etc etc It will keep going..
The second strain of support much like, it is with the economy more generally, is gentile elites who have a disporportionate amount of gay offspring. I have a pet theory that homosexuality is in someway related to feminine upbringing or environs.
What’s the point of normalizing weirdness pill? Who benefits & how? At least the alt-right’s white genocide theory makes sense.
I don’t get why people feel the need to promote something, especially if people have no control over it. You don’t decide to be gay (ironic I know), so how the hell are you supposed to commit homosexual acts in the first place.
How do you normalize things that are abnormal? That’s a statistical impossibility.
People barrely have control of something they are, even when people HAVE a control, it’s mean they NO have a control of their self-control.
Thats interesting. If you looked at Europe from say 1AD-1600AD youd say the intellectual centre was southern europe.
A lot of this was based mainly on trade in the Med.
Once the ports and spanish opened new routes, the northern economies for whatever reason capitalised on these new passages better and developed faster than the southerners did.
(Or maybe not. I think going from whats in present day africa to basic sewage, aquaducts and paved roads is a bigger jump than going from renaissance Italy to Industrial Britain).
pill groks it.
the very fact that judicial appointments are a big deal means the law is a joke.
if the law school graduates and their profs weren’t 100% perverts judicial appointments would be like “who cares?” BORING!
the law is a joke because if you make the King laugh hard enough he may see things your way.
the alternative is the King doing violence whenever and wherever he sees fit.
the gay/lez rhetoric fails to take account of a much larger fraction of the population.
those who find sexual relationships BORING or not worth the effort.
these people are not necessarily “asexual”.
they’re just lazy.
or Cynics!
the capital “C” is so important inside me.
BUT when a girl calls you a “low IQ racist homophobe” that means she wants you inside her. 100%.
when i was in hs there was a light blakc girl who with a yuge crush on me. she was very good looking too.
i pretended i didn’t notice.
whereas mass media says fuck her and leave her.
penis and vagina marriage is it.
everything else is santo.
those who find sexual relationships BORING or not worth the effort.
the unattractive, in other words.
says the midget who claims attractive is whatever the cult says it is.
swank contradicts herself for the thousandth time. sad!
No contradiction….
That attractiveness is a moving, arbitrary target doesn’t mean that there aren’t winners and losers in every time and place.
It’s just that the cause of this is how obedient people are and has nothing to do with any kind of raw biological attraction to one particular phenotype.
It wouldn’t make sense for women to be attracted to one phenotype…it would make more sense for them to associate winner with whatever phenotype seems to be winning in the moment, i.e. women are starfuckers but the brain still would be the main erogenous zone.
Swank what are your thoughts on certain facial proportions being valued by most people? I think there was an study in africa were people whom never had any large exposure to europeans were the sample. It was shown africans had an very similar hiearchy of attractiveness within european populations, meaning that blacks would understand which whites were valued the best in white cultures. IF attractiveness was learned, wouldnt the africans then not create the same hierarchy as europeans out of an different education?
There seems to be universally preffered traits for most people.
there’s a purely economic reason for sharing in hunter gatherer societies.
1. unlike dogs humans are not very good at hunting. humans hunted in packs too but usually failed. it’s the same in gathering. i scratch your back. you scratch mine.
2. the successful hunter or gatherer will hunt or gather much more than he needs for the day, and in tropical africa things don’t keep. this means there was sharing or the food spoiled. there was no putting up.
even in the frozen north meat would have spoiled in the summer.
there was simply no means of accumulating, storing wealth until seeds became a staple.
it’s pretty obvious swank is a bi-textual.
I think there was an study in africa were people whom never had any large exposure to europeans were the sample. It was shown africans had an very similar hiearchy of attractiveness within european populations, meaning that blacks would understand which whites were valued the best in white cultures.
link the study.
Herodotus of Greece believed that “[t]he Ethiopians to whom Cambyses sent these gifts are reputed to be the tallest and most beautiful of all peoples.”
aesthetics = people magazine. is people magazine timeless and universal?
actually seeds in the old world, potatoes in peru, and livestock. those peoples who don’t farm but own animals are called “pastoralists”. the jews were originally a pastoralist people according to the OT. so there was inequality in ancient mongolia for example though there was no farming. some owned more animals than others. one of the reasons for feudalism was that a horse is was very expensive. knights needed lots of land for their horses. inequality is seen in peoples in new guinea and borneo where wealth is measured in pigs. these peoples may be primitive but they are not technically hunter gatherers.
i meant aesthetics are mysterious in that it it isn’t always clear what the evolutionary purpose is or even if there is one. aesthetics is indicative of many things but not reducible to those things.
I didnt find the study, maybe it doenst exist…
Dont you think there are atleast some universally preffered traits? or do you think it doenst matter as those traits are so few and inqonsequentiall to the fact of most traits being choosed by culture?
Dont you think there are atleast some universally preffered traits?
I don’t know, “be human” sounds plausible enough.
Man is distinguished by his ability to learn. A human being can train himself in any direction he wants, he can direct his impulses in any direction.
That’s very adaptive.
Rather than being attracted to one specific phenotype, women are simply attracted to whatever they learn is “winning.” The same goes for men!
Irrelevant regurgitation as always… YOU’re a boring..
Pugkin love black males and not such a weird as you.
Compare you with Denzel Washington.
from an evopsych perspective:
1. what women want is often contradictory.
2. she wants the rich guy. (but rich guys are rare by definition.)
3. she wants the guy who looks like he‘s had great success as a hunter.
4. she wants the guy who looks like he will have great success as a hunter.
5. she wants the guy with a brain.
i don’t have that problem. she’d agree to live in a hut in siberia with me. that’s my level of sexy.
except she’s never the girl i like.
i’m into “old drug addicted lesbians”.
btw, pretty sure beer girl followed bourdain down the worm hole from this world to the next.
sad!
truly!
she was very pretty.
Evo-psych is nonsense.
Women do what they’re told, like most everyone else. They like what they’re told to like.
that was part of the point swank.
we need to meet at the manhole.
autism is destroyed by AIDS.
basically women and men qua savages are attracted to the same thing.
the bans is no more than 72. (wtf does that mean? is it related to ms pacman?)
she’s pretty. you’re pretty.
that’s the way it used to be.
and at age 13.
“pretty” may have some bullshit correlates like a strong immune system and the ability to hunt or bear chillens but ultimately these can’t explain much.
aesthetics don’t lie.
but they are mysterious.
and this is pill’s DEEP point.
your gut is usually wiser than your brain.
autists have no gut.
you’re simply restating the clever silly theory:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19733444
and the rebuttal:
Clever sillies was invented by a bunch of countryside RELIGIOUS/clever sillies people, well…
aesthetics don’t lie.
but they are mysterious.
no they aren’t.
you like what you are told to like.
what you see repeatedly associated with positive qualities = what you like.
aesthetics = visual cultural programming
every culture does the same thing.
(1) set up arbitrary hierarchy according to “material conditions” justified by whatever ideology
(2) part of the ideology is that this cultural programming is forever/natural/hereditary/biological
despite the fact that every “civilized” culture does this and, as time goes on, the “noble blood” explanations are found to be spurious and an excuse for an arbitrary hierarchy, people are sure that — in the present — well, by golly, we’ve got it right this time. it’s the truth, this time.
Drawing on the ideas of Kanazawa, my suggested explanation for this association between intelligence and personality is that an increasing relative level of IQ brings with it a tendency differentially to over-use general intelligence in problem-solving, and to over-ride those instinctive and spontaneous forms of evolved behaviour which could be termed common sense
“Drawing on the ideas of a retard, I believe that higher IQ brings with it a tendency to THINK TOO MUCH and ignore or refuse to accept those things which could be called OBEDIENCE CULTURAL PROGRAMMING.”
the problem with Terrence Tao high IQ types is that they require logical systems, which results in having models of the world that are completely internally consistent but poorly map.
because people are irrational, stupid, obedient, and above all else cowardly. they believe and follow rules “because I said so,” i.e. POWER, i.e. VIOLENCE.
And then the rebuttal assumes that a heritable component to these “weird” beliefs suggests that there’s an “evolutionary explanation.”
Why?
Culture runs across generations.
If there were an evolutionarily adaptive mechanism behind the phenomenon, why would the behavior exhibit high heritability?
In my opinion, high IQ people are less motivated to pursue their genetic interests (less tribal, greedy, materialistic, power hungry, sexual, maternal & homophobic) than low IQ people, causing them to appear to lack common sense, but in reality, they simply have higher & more abstract goals. Part of Trump’s appeal is he has goals & priorities the common man can relate to.
How can you say that things that are unnatural and completely the creation of culture are “genetic interests?” Greed, materialism, etc. etc. those are learned vices and behaviors that arise from civilization.
People collect money because they are told to do so. People become materialistic because they are told that material items = good. People juxtapose arbitrary “aesthetic” standards to their libidos because they are told who is good and bad to have sex with, etc. etc.
Because prehistorically, being greedy meant more food & resources for you & your tribe, thus helping your genes replicate.
But i agree people also do what they’re told. That’s probably another evolved trait, since following the tribe increased survival.
Because prehistorically, being greedy meant more food & resources for you & your tribe, thus helping your genes replicate.
no it didn’t. the early nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes weren’t in an environment where surplus resource allocation made sense or was practicable.
greed is wholly a product of sedentary, i.e. “civilized” life.
That’s probably another evolved trait, since following the tribe increased survival.
likely wrong on that score as well, even leadership is distributed communistically:
“So great is the contrast with human hunter-gatherers that it is widely argued by palaeoanthropologists that resistance to being dominated was a key factor driving the evolutionary emergence of human consciousness, language, kinship and social organization.”
“Anthropologists maintain that hunter/gatherers don’t have permanent leaders; instead, the person taking the initiative at any one time depends on the task being performed.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer
Civilization really does dehumanize, if these findings are to be believed.
So if a caveman killed a large animal, he just ate a tiny piece of it & left the rest for other tribes & vultures? He didn’t try to drag it back to camp for his kids & tribe to feast on?
“Anthropologists maintain that hunter/gatherers don’t have permanent leaders; instead, the person taking the initiative at any one time depends on the task being performed.”
We evolved to listen to whoever is the leader at a given time. In other words, follow the group
oh.
the band was no larger than 72.
that is, prior to the ag revolution humans lived in small groups which had very little inequality if any. so how much a man was worth wasn’t a thing. he could hunt or he couldn’t. he could resist disease or couldn’t.
The inequality was mostly between tribes, not within them. Even today much inequality is between dynasties. There’s obviously more inequality today because money can be passed down in a way food can’t
He didn’t try to drag it back to camp for his kids & tribe to feast on?
yes he shared it with everyone…that isn’t greed.
In other words, follow the group
blindly following the group isn’t it.
if resistance to being dominated was the primary driver of human consciousness, it’s only follow the group if it treats me fairly.
It is greed if the people you share with are only members of your tribe.
99% of the time the group does you treat you better than the alternatives & saves you from being dominated by other tribes or animals, so those who followed the group instinctively out-survived those who questioned group think.
Highly intelligent people tend to be more cooperative than competitive because cooperation estimulate more intelligence, specially abstract one, than competitive which estimulate emotional/reactive or noncognitive skills.
Or, they are more adapted to cooperative societies than to competitive societies, of course.
greed: a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (such as money) than is needed
sharing it with your tribe isn’t greed.
so the cavemen said “we’ve eaten all the meat we need. Let’s share the rest with those poor starving neanderthals and grizzly bears”
A caveman who thought that way wouldn’t be around too long because one of the benefits of greed is starving your enemies.
”The inequality was mostly between tribes, not within them. ”
Really***
Highly intelligent people is more adapted to FULL-”modern’ environments because their cognitive skills are already evolved-to-this environments.
Significant social inequality started during the transition in the neolitic when laboral stratification burst as well its quality.
”Highly intelligent people are not adapted to ancient human environments”
seems, they are more adapted exactly to environment before-complex societies OR parasitic-like societies, dominated by greedy elites exactly because DIRECT and equal cooperation is highly required.
Highly…. err… are more cognitively adapted to modern societies but not so psychologically… complex skills are required but also the capacity of social manipulation.
the ideology in my country is…
1. all men care about is the way she looks.
2. all women care about is how much he’s worth.
this affects both men and women in terms of how they understand their own “textualism”.
and it’s 100% crap.
100%.
male gold diggers are legion.
but they’re under the radar because ideology.
”1. all men care about is the way she looks.”
So men are responsible for dysgenia, directly, because a lot of very intelligent people are not pre-designed barbies.
lots of women find richard gere “icky”…
but that’s not the point.
whoever was cast in the role of julian kaye (stallone is a midget) would be gross to most women.
because women.
yes! richard gere is my man-crush. he’s up there with trump and galifianakis.
trump did 54…
to raise money…he claimed.
some disco is good.
The Anima is the collective of all female representations in the male psyche. She appears in dreams in one form or another but never as what has been seen in daily life but as a new person never yet seen. So she is a real being and has a presence. This is what males are attracted too by what they know is already inside them and encounter when awake. It may be instinct but it is simply the recognition within self.
The Secret to Leaving Comments Online
「AMV」Anime Mix- Breathe again
Emotional control requires the same mechanism as intelligence itself. (control)
Self-awareness increases intelligence because of increased control.
And awareness of self is experiencing the energy inside of you (that is emotion)
More awareness is more control. More intelligence encompasses emotion. (energy)
Puppy is confusing someone with bill gates, with all the people that have high IQs. I would say straight out nerds with no libido, no instinct and really poor social cognition are a slight majority of smart people. But there are smart people that are normal like the footballer Frank Lampard, or James Woods or Sharon Stone.
Not all smart people have to have the mind of ants.
Actually its a bit of a contradiction to say someone is smart because hes an ant.
I think high IQ people are more socially intelligent on average, but they often use their intelligence for abstract goals that average IQ people would consider foolish
I think puppy would be very surprised at amount of smart people with dark triad traits. Particularly the amount of non white/asian high IQ people with them. I remember talking to a north african descended ‘french’ portfolio manager at a CFA event. You could tell he was smart immediately, but also calculating. And not in the calculus way.
I knew a guy that worked for Rothschild as a banker….not a nice guy. Quite scary. His degree was in aircraft engineering. Im betting he was the least autistic person in the entire engineering department.
Bill Gates at work. Already you can see the genius that led to his high IQ decision to triple africas population.
1. Listen to Russell talk about his father. I would bet the elites of today, are nowhere near the IQ range of victorian elites. Funnily enough. I suspect there were smarter people alive in those times than today, but on average because of nutrition and sanitation, people are smarter. It says a lot about ‘repressive’ victorian society, that its elite were not bloodthirsty lesbians like Hillary.
2. What he says in the 8 minute mark is very poignant.
3. This list of what would make the world better seems more like a ‘how to stop ww3’ list, than a list of things that make sense. For example, he says he hates communism, then says countries around the world should have similar wealth under a world government. (?!)
I don’t like Russel as a philosopher. Hes actually more remember now as a mathematician. But what he and Wittgenstein did to philosophy was to basically nullify it for 80 years in the West.
The only other philosophical tradition that emerged in the West in this period was the Frankfurt postmodernism ‘its all a dream woooooo’ school. That stuff has infected all the other humanities subjects even though its basically ‘white people can’t be objective’.
People probably had more genetic potential for high intelligence in those days, but because of malnutrition & disease, fewer people reached their potential