Long before Ellen, Will & Grace or Modern Family, it was Oprah (and before her Donahue) and the genre of TV she popularized, that played the critical role bringing gays into the mainstream. Here she is way back in 1989 (before most of my readers were even born) discussing gay marriage.
Oprah really is the most influential woman in the World because virtually no single living person has done more to change the culture of America, and by extension, the World. It sounds bad to say now, but back in the 1980s people weren’t used to seeing a black looking black woman on TV. What few black celebs there were, were often mixed race or skin bleached, so to see an authentic dark skinned black woman with African features on TV was transformative. One Oprah fan told me that she didn’t watch for years because she thought “she is black, what kind of show can she have?” A TV station told the legendary King brothers (Oprah’s syndicators) that they could get a better rating with a potato than by putting a black woman on TV.
But if being overweight and hardcore black wasn’t taboo enough, Oprah shocked the world by discussing topics as forbidden as gay marriage, infidelity, food addiction, and above all, sexual abuse, leading millions of victims to recovery.
Even though at age three, Oprah was a preacher prodigy, raised to believe gays would go to hell, she slowly abandoned this dogma for a more inclusive spirituality that millions of her fans embraced.
A preacher at the age of 3
She was smart enough to know that as an overweight dark skinned black woman, she faced discrimination in the same way gays did, and with 20th century nutrition increasing the World’s brain size and IQ, an awakened public would soon embrace moral progress, causing gay suicide rates to plummet.
As Martin Luther King once observed, the arch of the moral universe is long, but bends towards justice.
Like all revolutionary leaders, Oprah got on the right side of history, way ahead of her time, just as she had with the Iraq war:
Pumpkin Person 
When I read Nietsche or Freud I might be getting 40% speculation, even pre-morbid schizophrenia is nietsches case…..but with the other 60% I have something to work with.
With the analytical people, when you look at it and you read his famous essay ‘on denoting’ i think its called. It doesn’t actually have a point. What is the point in saying ‘what is the point’ in a clearer way? How clear do you need a proposition to be. If you wanted it to be crystal clear convert it to numbers and go back to doing math.
I was looking at those PISA math problems that apparently only 1% of 16 year old brazilians can solve.
Man. Some of these I would have done in my head when I was younger. Even now, with a life at home drugged up schiz existence playing video games all day, all i need is a pen and paper for the last one.
Karlin won’t go on to say what naturally follows from his insight: i.e.
Many of these people exist because they are meant to serve. No other reason.
Why does a horse pull a cart?
Please provide an link to the questions. is it this?
Click to access pisa2012-2006-rel-items-maths-ENG.pdf
Here is the way nature works as told by me based on my experience (this is the same qualification most MSM writers use by the way too).
Anyway, when I was growing up there was a guy called Lee who was extremely effeminate to the point where everyone knew he was gay. He was never bullied.
The people who were bullied for being a ‘faggot’ or ‘queer’ were people who were assumed mainly straight but were wilting a bit here and there.
This shows nature acts through boys behaviours (instinct, like birds flocking together yadda yadda) to ‘toughen up’ boys. It is my belief that nature thinks homosexuality is malleable. And that is why ultra effeminate boys like Lee don’t get bullied. But people on the fence do.
This is something people knew in the 18th century as well by the way. But were ‘educated’ out of knowing and into la la land dear white people.
Funny that many learn to belive anti hereditarian beliefs when it comes to most traits while they learn radical hereditarianism when it comes to sexuality.
But saying that americans are anti-hereditarianism is questionable, as many think that they are “not smart enough”.
Epigenetics explained or one type of epigenetics.
Example: literacy or phenotypical expression of acquired fundamental cultural tools/language and vocabulary.
Most people were born or are hardwired to be capable to learn how to write and to read a vocabulary on their mother tongue.
Because we don’t born knowing [maybe, the next human evolution would be…] how to write or to read, we need to be teached by those who know.
People who are deprived from this elementary learnings will not express or develop the genes/or whatever intrinsic-biological which are designed to this symbol-pattern-association [language] skills. We don’t know, or i don’t know what are the real outcomes of this specific deprivation. We know older people who are/were illiterate can learn vocabulary, but most of the cases are from very poor socio-economic background, presumably those with ‘lower’ cognitive skills.
Unfortunately we can’t test the same person in different environments to know [i said PERSON] how s/h/xe would behave even we can deduct or draw some important lines based on people’s behavior. We can accurately detect those who have higher risk to commit a crime and those who never would be capable to do that based on their personality/ reactive-sensitive patterns.
Human intelligence evolution seems has been based on increasing horizontal learning potential via supression of instinctive behavioral mode, which already consist on inherited learning. Instincts are everything about biases, super faster, pre-determined answers, the end in itself. It’s can be very accurate when it’s correct but
it’s excessively if not absolutely stubborn
A primitive way to deal with information, very useful in truly primitive environments but not in reason-based social environments.
Instincts alone often don’t maximize both the potential of surviving and understanding, but the just the first, and surviving in short term. In long term, it’s impossible no have the understanding and outcomes of our actions.
more on the meaning of “aesthetics don’t lie.”
beauty is truth. truth beauty, that is all ye know on earth. and all ye need to know. — john keats.
watch this vid but the audio of this vid.
watch (turn off audio): https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=gLvg0rjI6jQ
listen (turn off the video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qssvnjj5Moo
even if you’re not a dog person…the irish setter is generally regarded as the hakuho of dog beauty.
this is odd because red hair is generally considered unattractive in humans.
as milo said, “prince harry might be the first hot ginger.”
but charles dance is pretty sexy to most white women…being 6’3″ doesn’t hurt.
ginger hunk charles dance:
britain IS special in the frequency of red hair. VERY special.
basically 90+% of people with red hair are british.
isaac newton
william the conqueror
shakespeare
thomas jefferson
all GINGERS.
all GENIUSES.
ashkenzim are much more likely to have red hair than blond hair. why?
Jewish gingers have british admixture
Jewish blonds have german admixture & sadly many Jews in germany didn’t survive
That’s why
Scandinavian Jews?
As a baby i was strawberry blond. I was an extremely beautiful baby. Relatives would drive miles just to hold me.
https://the-art-of-autism.com/poems-art-for-peace-2018-3rd-installment/
Iluminatti, i wish you like it.