Obama has realized that if he wants to maintain his enormous popularity among liberals, he can no longer just sit on the sidelines as Trump tramples all over his legacy. At the same time, the last thing he wants to do is ruin his retirement and risk his pristine reputation by getting into a mud fight, since no one benefits more from those than Trump. Thus he seems to have found a middle ground of mild criticism.
Trump reacted with a zinger about falling asleep.
When Obama fans heard about this, they went absolutely ballistic.
It’s not surprising they would become so angry. They consider Obama to be the greatest public speaker of all time, so to have a man they consider unworthy of shining Obama’s shoes, not only destroy Obama’s legacy, but mock even his greatest talent, just adds insult to injury.
Why are they so psychologically invested in Obama? Because white liberals pride themselves in supporting the underdogs and thus being very pro-black, but for years they’ve struggled to find a black they can get excited about. Rap stars and athletes are too uneducated for their elitist tastes. Even Oprah struck some of them as tacky for celebrating diets and materialism, and being loved by Midwestern housewives.
In Obama they found a black who looked, acted, and had the credentials of the white liberal elite, and thus he became their messiah. By contrast, Trump is everything they hate (tacky materialism, uneducated speaking style, white working class fans) and is also a “racist” white conservative, making him the ultimate villain.
Pumpkin Person 
iirc hitch and chomsky AGREED with pill regarding nixon. i suspect swank does too.
and hitch was a holocaust denier apparently.
pill’s point (i presume) is NOT that nixon wasn’t a crook. he was NOT framed.
the point is they’re ALL crooks.
but nixon was treated differently.
I agree on that point. My point was only that Woodward & Bernstein played a role in him being removed. pill thinks they were irrelevant, and history would have played out exactly the same way without them.
Hey, got an off topic question for you. I’ve noticed before that you have used the correlation of IQ to brain size as a gradient of sorts between the two thus allowing you to find a relationship between them. For example you’ve mentioned that for a correlation of 0.4, for every 1 standard deviation increase in brain size we get 0.4 standard deviation increase in IQ. That to me seems more like the beta coefficient or standardized regression coefficient. For beta to equal to correlation the two variables need to have the same standard deviation. This is obviously not the case as they don’t even have the same units. So either they are using beta and your assumption is correct or they are not using beta in which case the relationship of IQ to brain size is somewhat different to what you assume it is. I suspect if there is some sort of standardization of the data(conversion to unit-less data) then maybe you would be right, but not sure how that would be done while there is no indication that this is what they have done in these studies.
Also found a study you might find interesting:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799952/
Note that they used healthy students from Washington University in St Louis(a top tier school) and that the average ICV(cranial capacity) done by MRI for men is 1675 cc. I would suspect that the average IQ there would be at least 120 which means that they would have brains at least 2 SD bigger than the average. This would fall in line with the reported average from various studies ranging from 1440 to 1490 cc. I am assuming that the students were predominantly White with perhaps some Asians.
If one assumes a bivariate normal distribution, then the correlation between x and y when both are expressed as Z scores is equal to the slope of the regression line, so a 1 SD increase in brain size predicts a 0.4 SD increase in IQ and vice versa.
If the Washington students average IQ 120 (+1.33 SD), I’d expect their brain size to be only +1.33(0.4) = 0.53 SD. Their IQs would be more extreme than their brain size because they were selected based on grades & SATs, which correlate more with IQ than they do with brain size. The 1675 cc figure suggests different MRI scans give different results as a professional in the field recently told me.
So I guess it is safe to assume that they are converting their data to z scores in order to standardize the data hence giving an SD unit of 1 and allowing for a correlation that essentially functions as a gradient(expressed in units of SD). Thanks for the confirmation, I was beginning to suspect as much.
As for the Washington students I’m pretty sure you have made a mistake in your calculations. Wouldn’t it be 1.33/0.4= 3.3 SD increase in brain size? That would be at least 300 cc extra putting the average just below 1375 cc, far too low IMO.
“Their IQs would be more extreme than their brain size because they were selected based on grades & SATs, which correlate more with IQ than they do with brain size”
Yup, that makes sense! Also my thinking regarding this issue is that increase in IQ does not vary linearly with increase in brain size. I suspect that for every additional SD increase in brain size the percentage of that additional brain tissue utilized for intelligence also increases. My rationale is that only so much brain tissue is necessary for all other bodily functions. So say some of it goes to the senses and you have better hearing eye sight, sensations, bodily control(physical and psychological) but there is usually an absolute limit for those aspects of brain function. So the excess beyond a certain point probably almost entirely goes to IQ. So for example it may well be that at higher brain sizes (say 1.5 SD +) the correlation with IQ is far greater perhaps even 1. Keep in mind that this is a low sample size(relatively). Your MRI explanation sounds plausible.
So I guess it is safe to assume that they are converting their data to z scores in order to standardize the data hence giving an SD unit of 1 and allowing for a correlation that essentially functions as a gradient(expressed in units of SD). Thanks for the confirmation, I was beginning to suspect as much.
The correlation will come out the same, regardless of whether they calculate it from the raw data or standardized data. But if they were to convert to Z scores, we’d expect the correlation to equal the slope of the regression line and thus the standardized beta coefficient. This is the default assumption when dealing with roughly normal distributions.
As for the Washington students I’m pretty sure you have made a mistake in your calculations. Wouldn’t it be 1.33/0.4= 3.3 SD increase in brain size? That would be at least 300 cc extra putting the average just below 1375 cc, far too low IMO.
No because regression works both ways. Just as people who are high in brain size regress to the mean in IQ, people who are high in IQ regress to the mean in brain size. If Washingston students are typical of people with +1.33 SD IQs, their average brain size should be +1.33(0.4) = +0.53 SD. You seem to think a group’s mean brain size is always more extreme than its mean IQ, but that would lead to the absurd expectation that the Mega society (probably +5 SD in IQ on average) would average 5/0.4 = 12.5 SD in brain size!
So say some of it goes to the senses and you have better hearing eye sight, sensations, bodily control(physical and psychological) but there is usually an absolute limit for those aspects of brain function. So the excess beyond a certain point probably almost entirely goes to IQ. So for example it may well be that at higher brain sizes (say 1.5 SD +) the correlation with IQ is far greater perhaps even 1.
Possible but very speculative.
“The correlation will come out the same, regardless of whether they calculate it from the raw data or standardized data. But if they were to convert to Z scores, we’d expect the correlation to equal the slope of the regression line and thus the standardized beta coefficient. This is the default assumption when dealing with roughly normal distributions.”
Basically what I wrote, albeit perhaps not as clearly as I would have liked.
“No because regression works both ways. Just as people who are high in brain size regress to the mean in IQ, people who are high in IQ regress to the mean in brain size.”
Yes I see now that is what the theory says….hmmm I still think that there is something wrong here. We do know that a multiple regression analysis is not symmetrical in other words it would not give us the same correlation when we invert the dependant/independant variables and my guess is that the truth of the matter is that IQ is dependent on far more than just brain size. Intuitively this would make much more sense to me.
Yes I see now that is what the theory says….hmmm I still think that there is something wrong here. We do know that a multiple regression analysis is not symmetrical in other words it would not give us the same correlation when we invert the dependant/independant variables
We’re talking about simple regression right now, not multiple regression, since we’re only using one variable to predict to another
and my guess is that the truth of the matter is that IQ is dependent on far more than just brain size. Intuitively this would make much more sense to me.
If it were exclusively dependent on brain size a 1 SD increase in brain size would predict a 1 SD increase in IQ instead of just a 0.4 SD increase.
obama is…
1. bought (pill’s theory)
OR
2. autistic (my theory)
there’s NO other explanation.
He might be a puppet, but he got something out of the deal (status, a bit of money), so no, not autistic
IQ isn’t fine grained enough.
for example: great synthetic organic chemists are almost exclusively nordic, japanese, or two levant gentiles, cory and nicolaou.
jews dominate the theoretical parts of natsci. they aren’t much over-represented in the nitty gritty.
jews are over-repped in computer science but are not in any mechanical, electrical, chemical, or civil engineering.
this corresponds to their IQ profile.
basically: the intellectual endeavors which actually create wealth are dominated by white gentiles and china people.
https://youtu.be/p_DPOe2OMwI
That comment by trump is very funny. Even when I was a liberal I found Obamas speeches boring. They are boring. Trump always says the truth. Thats why its funny.
Well, what happened with Nixon is something I don’t fully understand. They get rid of him, but then appointed Gerald Ford. Who is of the same cloth basically.
It may well be that Nixon was losing it towards the end and really was getting too paranoid and his bosses thought he was going off the reservation.
Usually the guy they replace someone with, is a new direction. e.g. Johnson after Kennedy.
Huh? You do realize ford was VP under Nixon & that VPs automatically become president when the president resigns?
No he wasnt
Yes, he was.
From wiki:
On October 10, 1973, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned and then pleaded no contest to criminal charges of tax evasion and money laundering, part of a negotiated resolution to a scheme in which he accepted $29,500 in bribes while governor of Maryland. According to The New York Times, Nixon “sought advice from senior Congressional leaders about a replacement.” The advice was unanimous. “We gave Nixon no choice but Ford,” House Speaker Carl Albert recalled later.[31] Ford agreed to the nomination, telling his wife that the Vice Presidency would be “a nice conclusion” to his career.[35]
Ah youre right. I always thought the VP resigned as well and as house leader he took the role. In any case, nixon was told to choose him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Nickel_Grass
Read the last sentence in this.
today he’d be forced to resign the same day.
Do you think there is that the less average is your IQ , the more difficult it is to pass the driving license ? I see around me that there are a disproportionate number of clever people without it.
Maybe it’s because you need to build up chrystallized intelligence and be on automatic pilot and not let your cortex take control of the mental task. So the more fluid intelligence you get, the less effective you would be. And very dumb people would also struggle because it’s hard for them to build crystallized intelligence .
I have no drivers license.
The smartest person i ever corresponded with said he had to be forced by his dad to get a driver’s licence. His IQ was so high something as mundane as driving didn’t interest him. Another reason could be high IQ types are more environment friendly.
More arrogance from Bruno. Bruno please explain why driving should only be the preserve of the upper classes like you?
It is the the opposite. I said it seems to exclude the extreme, on both the low and high end. And i didn’t say it should be that way. I asked about the reasons why it seems to be that way.
If it was arrogant still, it’s not’because I implied that I am a driver and then not in the low end, but because I implied I am not driver and thus in the high end . That’s why Pumpkin answered as he did.
You ve got good intuitions dear Philo but logical problems. You should word on your deduction skills. Try to pass the GMAT or LSAT, it’s a good exercise to know what you can infer or not.
It’s also a joke your are the one doing the apology of humility 😉
Can anyone estimate the IQ of Because Science
what peepee calls “adapting” is what non-mixed race people call “lying”.
obama is bought means he’s lying.
obama is autistic means he’s a brainwashed puppet.
no one can “adapt” in too many ways. it’s too much effort to be fake all the time. the result is what peepee calls “adapting” doesn’t apply to politics and ideology unless you’re a sociopath or an autist. the pope is catholic. obama is brainwashed. oprah is a sociopath. fact. fact. fact.
the autist and the sociopath are game characters. non-autists and non-sociopaths are player characters. game characters have no authentic self. the autist has no will. the sociopath has only the will to be evil like oprah. the authentic person is a person.
Sociopaths have the most universal, simple & primordial goals (money, power) so they’re the ones for whom adaptive behavior can most easily be observed. They live by the law of the jungle so their IQs are most correlated with Darwinian outcomes like acquiring status & resources. They thus provide the clearest test of my definition of intelligence (adaptability).
But sociopathy is relative. Oprah’s probably more sociopathic than the average American though less sociopathic than most of similar wealth or influence.
the autist and the soiopath are driven by an alien will. the autist’s will is that of some sociopath who controls him. the sociopath’s will is that of the devil.
The sociopath has the will of an animal: power, resources, sex, genetic interests. The non-sociopath has the same will, but with morality competing with the other goals & often derailing them. Non-sociopaths need much higher IQs to get rich & powerful because they must adapt to their moral goals in addition to their material & political ones & the two almost always conflict.
Correct.
But to be an authentic human being requires morality taking priority over any decision. Judges who do not consider morality at all and advocate as much are like Ed Meese… evil.
Socipath: autist master:slave
Most people, including muggy so far are legal autists.
but a slave knows he’s a slave.
and
judges have a moral duty to the electorate not just to the litigants or accused. the law is sort of like the rules of a game we all agree to in order not to be at war with each other all the time. judicial usurpation is violating trust and sherking duty.
but unlike pill my picture of the world is more like sheep being herded by sheep rather than a few evil people herding the sheep. the fraction of people who can distinguish between morality and fashion is small.
judges have a moral duty to the electorate not just to the litigants or accused
“the electorate” = platonic jive
the law is sort of like the rules of a game we all agree to
but it’s sort of nothing like that at all…it’s violence on behalf of those in power writ large for the non-retarded: You call it what you want! You’re down there, we’re up here!.
not to be at war with each other all the time.
Leviathan‘s state of nature is obvious state/noble propaganda
“you need to give us money because we protect you.”
judicial usurpation is violating trust and sherking duty.
there’s only the ability to wield power to do something good or to do something bad. the rest is just air, for example — trust in what? the fake agreement between the fake consentors and their oppressors? duty to do what? uphold unjust laws and make immoral decisions?
to say a judge ought to render a decision that he believes is unjust on behalf of fake concepts like ‘electorate’ and ‘consent of the governed,’ and against the real parties before him….is silly and asking him to deny his humanity.
Many people would say it is morally just to stick to the constitution instead of making stuff up. Warren literally admitted he was looking for stuff that wasn’t in the constitution.
And you keep saying people loved his decision. In the 1960s, before Harvey Weinstein took started making dumb movies, people rioted.
“The Constitution” apart from the parchment….IS made up!
Morally the question should always be…is the status quo of this convenient fiction just, or not? What can I do within the limits of legitimacy to make it better?
Phil badmouths Warren who is responsible for our modern understanding of the first, fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments to the constitution.
Phil and muggy don’t understand that these understandings are modern and their historicity was only a post hoc narrative revision…which is why they believe the modern understanding truly has root in early America.
A slave need not know he’s a slave. He only needs to know that his course of action is directed by fear. Of death is the primitive example, but as society grows more complex this relation will be known by other names….fear of a “state of nature” for example.
within the limits of legitimacy
and the limits of legitimacy are the limits of original intent. unless you’re a dumbass [redacted by pp, sept 9, 2018]
why didn’t “sherking” have a red line under it?
is “sherk” a word?
“original intent” is a made up concept. Because history is constantly being rewritten, you honestly believe that the modern free speech and criminal procedure protections have a connection to original intent.
There’s just a cartel that does violence. That’s the fact. Everything else is you believing in fairy tales. When you start believing in fairy tales for the sake of the fairy tale rather than so long as they lead to good real world results….you’re a slave.
But America was founded on the basis that it wasn’t going to be knights of the round table telling people what to do. Thats why people left Europe to come! Idiot.
No it wasn’t you autistic retard.
Rich people in the Colonies realized that they could sustain themselves without interference from the crown.
Every State starts like this: powerful group makes a play at acquiring or seizing territory using violence.
The cultural climate of the Colonies lent itself to rhetoric of the type you’re describing.
But it’s ..just…and has always been…
Jive.
A means to an end.
Obamas not autistic. Thats ridiculous. I would say obama has had an invisible man moment. He thought he could be a good house negro and change the system from within. Then Michael Forman told him who to put in his cabinet. I think he genuinely believes in a lot of the liberal stuff. But once you become president and rahm emmanuel is assigned to make sure you don’t do anything against their interests, you get a bit jaded.
I would suspect, Obama is HBD aware, not because of blacks actually, but because he realised how powerful jews were when he was climbing the political ladder.
The secret of HBD isn’t blacks at all. Its actually people at the other end of the IQ scale.
He was probably asked to hire rahm by some of the people who funded his campaign thus proving my point that anyone with money is an “elite”
Good Lord, pill has a low social IQ!
He thinks Jews are trying to hide their high IQ: “we’re brilliant, but don’t tell anyone”
Just the opposite. High Jewish IQ is one the only parts of HBD you’re allowed to publicly discuss (see cochran in the NY Times, the promoting of jordan peterson & Pinker) because it deflects from more sinister theories of how Jews gained power.
Why do you think Einstein’s been promoted as the poster boy for genius for half a century?
Jews oppose HBD, not because they’re trying to hide their high IQ, but because they want affirmative action for blacks & immigration from Africa
Likewise there is a statement from Murray that NY state public school psy identified the 28 cleverest pupils and 24 were Jewish (in Bell Curve and in an article about Jewish intelligence where he pass all theories about the cause of their superiority). This statement is never backed up by any reference. And is vague because you don’t know if it were the 28 cleverest Hunter elementary school pupils in a certain period of time in the 40 and 50 (that would be meaningless because of regression to the mean of people selected at 5yo who were 60% jewish, they were 10% of the pupils and didn’t have the money to go to private schools ) or if there were identified by IQ tests administered in all schools.
So there is some building up of their scores. It’s telling that Ivies gives average SAT for many subgroups (see Crimson) except Jewish . The main factor is probably so that 75% of the population doesn’t realize they have 25% of the slots, when you count Jewish separately, but maybe also because the numbers are build up by legacy pushing (versus East Asian and Brahmin).
In absolute numbers, at Harvard , non Jewish white is the most discriminated against group. They are 9 times more under-represented than asian and 2 times more than black )
if anything jews want everyone to believe that their wealth and power is due solely to their high IQs and that their IQs are high for genetic reasons. the pale of settlement was NOT a nice place to live. the jews never showed any intellectual superiority until about 100 years ago.
It may be more complicated because Jews were enormously successful in very different societies of antiquity : in babylone, egypt, Greece, Rome . In Rome, they had a huge % of all revenue. Herode managed the richest region.
Jewish intelligence manage them to create and extract lots of wealth when they are operation with people who build civilization. They do good with whites but not when they are by themselves. They were not able to fix asian because they are less sensible to universal stories. Probably, all ism including all monotheism have been invented by them ….
If you want to take a Watson Crick view of things (Pumpkin are they racist now?), you can see that most things that happen in the world are based on genetics and not much on chance or individual discretion.
I mean I never wanted to be a basket case and this schiz stuff only really started happening to me in my late 20s.
More broadly the world works according to the way if you designed a video games of orcs, elves, and goblins and made orcs super high testosterone, elves kind and goblins smart and deceptive….you’d get more or less a similar world to planet earth and you can guess for yourselves who is who in this analogy.
Whites are not kind, you fool! If anything, Asians are the superior race in terms of kindness. No way would I say whites have optimal empathy levels. There is no race that can be identified as “kind.” Whites are frickin’ assholes, give them a little more testosterone and they’re just as pathological to this world as any other race. You’re just a closet white supremacist. SORRY NOT SORRY, DUMBASS.
it’s true. as i’ve said and as e. michael jones has said, “white” is a new world identity. maybe a little bit a ZA identity too. but in europe people have not thought of themselves as europeans (whites) until very recently. and even now most europeans identify with their nationality more than with being european.
italy will save us.
one’s identity is relative to the competition. Italians living among Italians will identify with their family because that’s what differentiates them. But if space aliens invade, all races will identify as human.
The media says trump is over every fuckin week. Its getting way out there now. Deranged even.
i wonder if it’s just that i’m older or have things actually changed. did i change or did things change so much?
peepee should ax wordpress for a copy of her blog. she should then put this in yucca mountain so that mugabe’s wisdom will be preserved for the ages.
the dem convention in 2016 (with the exception of bernie and warren) and obama’s platitudes…no one can be that stupid, unless they’re lying or they’re something like a wind up toy, a trained dog doing tricks he has no idea why he’s doing.
identity politics is the attempt at progressive bona fides by the dem donor class all of whom are opposed to medicare for all, the end of student loans, ubi, etc.
cui bono? whom does identity politics actually benefit? whom does it hurt? not in theory but in fact.
if anyone wants to grok how american politics actually works he can listen to this: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/649/its-my-party-and-ill-try-if-i-want-to
the problem is the electorate is waking up. the donor class is waging a war against the truth. you can’t fool all the people all the time.
obama won election and re-election because he was black. people thought that a black president wouldn’t be a moderate republican. he was. explanation is corrupt or autism. and the jews were behind it. pill is right about that. obama was chosen by robert rubin, just like carter was chosen by david rockefeller.
All politicians need the support of robert rubin types to even play the game, so all of them are puppets on some issues.
Obama’s a puppet on wall street & a supporter of diversity
trump’s a puppet on wall street & Israel
Warren is a puppet on Israel & immigration
Hillary & McCain were puppets on everything
And so robert rubin types decide who gets to play the game, but then democracy and oprah (same thing) decide who the final winner is. But robert rubins are a dime a dozen. There’s only one Oprah, hence Oprah (thanks to huge brain size) is the one black more influential than rubin.
^^^
Hahahahahaha. I genuinely laughed out loud reading that.
The truth is funny. Oprah really does have comparable influence to rubin. If rubin had never been born, another wonky jewish intellectual would have taken his place & history would have unfolded pretty much the same way. Oprah on the other hand is a once a in a century talent:
rubin only seems more influential, because he plays for a more influential team, not because he as an individual is more influential.
Is britney spears a once in century talent Puppy?
Oprah had the number one talk show on U.S. TV for virtually 25 years straight. Did Spears have the #1 song on the radio for 25 straight years? More like 25 days at her peak.
obama:
http://blackamericanacollectibles.biz/gunthermann-strauss-wind-up-black-negro-lehmann-art-wind-up-old-toy-german.html
dave chapelle was in a museum in france and he heard french people talking. he said, “that’s racist!” the french people said, “we don’t hate you because you’re black. we hate you because you’re an american.” chapelle said, “finally someone hates me for a good reason.”
the dem donor class want to replace “american” with “poor”.
bill maher has used the term “white trash” so many times it’s absurd. yet he had to apologize for using the word “nigger”. black people get this more than white liberal sheeple. one black guy said: “in the south you can be white and you can be black but you can’t be poor and white.” and then these haters wonder why white trash votes republican. because they’re racist? and they’re racist because they’re morons. really?
trump is the voice crying in the wilderness for winston smith.
Head circumference is 0.4 correlated with IQ means 24% of IQ is explained by head circumference.
Oprah’s IQ = 140 = 2.66-SD
0.4(2.66) = 15.96 IQ points
15.96 = IQ points explained by Oprah’s head circumference = 24% (86% is unexplained)
————–
If all of Oprah’s IQ was “psudo” explained by head circumference.
0.4(6.66-SD) = 40 IQ points
Still, 100 – 24 = 86 [86% of Oprah’s IQ is not explained by head circonference]
and so
40 = IQ points explained by Oprah’s head circumference = 24% (86% is unexplained)
Which is ridiculous as she 6.66-SD = IQ 200
(0.4)^2 = 0.16 not 0.24 _ oops
sailer was calling a woman a loser the other day in comparison to tucker carlson. i agree that i do sometimes detect envy in liberals but not often. the rich and powerful should be criticized. just cruelty and hypocrisy on sailer’s part. the guy begs for money every month. lion thinks his wife must be loaded. well he is tall. people who think in terms of winners and losers are losers.
it’s either “great is our sin” or “eugenics”. capital likes to keep the issue unresolved as either way it would mean the end to their rule.
what swanks wants is bellum omnium contra omnes. this accords with HBD if swank is actually an italian. thanks to pat buchanan for the latin.
Muggy believes that civilization itself is not the war of all against all….
He presumes order where there is well disguised chaos…
He can’t see that his understanding of history is only his generation’s collective understanding of the same, fashioned for present day agendas….
Because Ed Meese has pounded his ass into submission.
Admittedly….it takes high high Thomas Paine IQ to understand these things….
Swank IQ: 69
TeePee IQ: 200
peepee thinks ugly white women are ugly because they’re bad people but ugly black women are ugly because racism.
truly sad!
yes. the world would be a better place if ed meese pounded your guinea ass into submission.
Well of course you’d recommend him….
it’s obvious you have a crush on ed meese. you’re into old dudes. who am i to judge?
ventriloquisted Ed Meese, with his hand up muggy’s ass, voice affected with a Ms. Piggy timbre
“it’s so obvious…all the men want Mr. Meeeeeeese…mmmmMMM….”
^^^AUTISM^^^
chomsky has said that if there are differences between the races these are only concerning in a racist society. (by a “racist society” he means a society where individuals aren’t judged on their own merits but by their group identity. so you see that the contemporary corporate dems are the most racist american party ever.)
chomsky will deny it but it follows from his statement that:
he is opposed to affirmative action for the sake of diversity. diversity IS a racist goal. though he may not be against affirmative action for the descendants of slaves.
peepee thinks black women should have affirmative action because they’re hideous.
truly sad!
i think black women are more attractive than black men actually
in a non-racist society race is effectively invisible. it affects no decisions. for example: affirmative action would also benefit the descendants of indentured servants.
you’re not seriously comparing indentured servitude to chattel slavery i hope
but at the same time peepee doesn’t think that ugly people in general should receive affirmative action…
because peepee is a racist.
i think descendants of slaves deserve affirmative action. Their ancestors literally built harvard & you’re saying they can’t go there because they didn’t score high on some culturally biased test, that until the 80s underestimated their WAIS IQs by 0.5 SD. And yet asians & jews who have only been in america since wwII can be dramatically over-represented?
Pumpkin…..youre starting to scare me.
Why are you talking so much like Deal now? It makes me think you are Deal.
“because they didn’t score high on some culturally biased test”
???!!! The real pumpkin or I suppose, the character thats been presented all this time to us, wouldn’t say this.
what happened in that house race in NY?
the 100% purely corrupt negro won…because he was a negro.
Those people at the Dem convention and for that matter those people talking about free marketing at the republican convention are not always autistic. People like Tyler Cowen and in Chicagos economics department, yes 100% agree. But when john mccain talks about free markets or george bush, they’re bullshitting.
You don’t need to be a sociopath to talk nonsense. Marco Rubio is not a sociopath, but hes a puppet and told exactly what to say.
So bad.
When a person works, they do what their employer says. In some countries without labour regulations, this can mean anything basically. Are these people sociopaths? That psychology experiment with the electric shocks shows people are psychologically disposed to serve, for whatever reason. My hunch is that modern humans have differently wired minds to primitive peoples through ongoing husbandry/domestication. I.e. an asian person is far far less likely to randomly attack someone than person from the jungle in Uganda.
africans have had agriculture for a long time now too.
I believe both climate and agriculture selected for racial differences in behavior.
To study the effects of cold climate, compare Africans with Northeast Asians
To study the effects of agriculture, compare West Africans to pygmies/bushmen, or compare Northeast Asians with Arctic people
You get that a lot in gangs and cults as well. People following mindless instructions to do basically anything. Its not just politicians.
Where I would say sociopathy/psychopathy is demonstrated is if the person ‘knows better’ or is the actual ringmaster of the charade. So a person joining a cult is not sociopathic, but a person who knowingly joins a cult he knows is a sham just for access to women or for certain social manipulation strategies does demonstrate.
The pope being catholic is not always true. In many historical cases, there is loads of evidence showing the pope knows its a sham.
If a new pope comes in and changes the rules, swank will say its fine as its all a sham anyway and he can make up whatever he wants.
But my argument is and always has been, if youre a christian, you do christian things. You don’t suddenly introduce a 60 day fasting period or make everyone walk to Mecca. Some people who are a bit innocent believe in it for fairly altruistic reasons or social cohesion reasons.
You then have a literate or intellectual class that historically parses religious doctrine and teachings and founds schools/universities. You can’t walk around thrashing everything because you had a hot flush and now feel blacks was kangz as of monday morning. Its absurd.
And besides, the motivation to change the rules is important. If a person wanted christians to journey to mecca, you’d start thinking he was a secret Muslim.
If a person wanted you to dismantle the constitution, you’d start thinking he was the opposite of an american, wouldn’t you?
Or is ‘being an american’ = ‘whatever rabbi tim wise says’?
in future comment on my comments.
Its a bit twilight zoney, these questions of charades, cults and identities. I remember watching or reading something in philosophy suggesting our conception of ourselves is a sham. Our ‘history’ and ‘family’ and identiy as an ‘individual’. Really ghost story stuff. Mind bending stuff. There is a lot of inbuilt nonsense that comes with the hardware, the brain, some of it is simply there for survival reasons, not truth telling reasons.
One of the big differences between schiz and autism is the relation of the self to your own identity. An autist won’t budge much from a lot of things he thinks are true about how he conceives himself. But someone on the other side is a lot more open to different ideas about ones self. In this way, many crazy people are no longer servile to master and have a true kind of ‘freedom’.
Many people would then say servility and following rules is worth it for sanity and survival reasons.
Even if it wasn’t a staight cult like islam or christianity and something more tribal like being a member of the zapotec clan in Mexico a few hundred years ago. You can’t just make up random shit for psychopathic reasons. What you say as tribal elder or high priest should follow on from what was done before. Its common sense.
Rick Sanchez IQ 235
Is This Game Popular with Autistic People
https://youtu.be/1SPyKEM58GI
i know sank hates math but i’d like to see the numbers for my claim.
like: the correlation between per capita gdp (PPP) in new world countries and their % unmixed european.
the latter number is impossible because “unmixed” in the US and canada actually means unmixed whereas in argentina it means mixed just not much.
but anyway. i’ll do this in excel if no one else does.
what matters isn’t white individuals. what matters is homogeneity.
the british are not the world’s best looking people. nor are they the world’s smartest people.
but they have bottom.
so said some historian.
this would explain coe and bannister and snell and ovett and cram AND that old carthusian mallory and hillary.
the british are like will smith.
will smith said, “i start a race with you. either i win or i fall off the treadmill. i’m not stopping.”
“bottom” is an adjective used of a horse.
it means Bottom: A horse’s overall stamina is referred to as the bottom.
i know because i have no bottom. santo destroyed it.
one of the things one learns in his old age is how very important persistence is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc0gYbTNctU
even though swank is a mossad agent you will notice that the two commenters who have identified themselves as italian are both anti-hbd, but one of them, swank, is pro italian world domination.
this suggests swank is a mossad agent. which he is.
this is sad!
LOL. Alex Jones claims he was visited by a mossad agent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xJdFWsCfvw&t=236s
the war of all against all is the lucchese crime family at the end of the period depicted in Goodfellas. it’s stalin’s soviet union.
it leads to paranoia and mass murder.
So i have a new psychiatrist and kept bashing the guardian controlling his mind. I said the alco at the bookies smelling of piss knows the deal more. Once again they think that part is madness. Right.
I bet once in a blue moon some of these people do realise some of the people they meet are saying “and yet it moves” but not in latin.
I lile gaililei not because of his scientific finding. I think copernicus got there first. But the fact he was brave to say it and face the tunnel of madness when the whole world says hes evil and mad and incompetent and he cant help but noticing it. Thats the part of his story i like. It could be any observation.
so the fake part of the story? Galileo folded whenever he was questioned on the matter. Every time.
““We can only guess at what he really believed,” said Kelly, who for his research undertook a thorough examination of the judicial procedure used by the church in its investigation of Galileo. “Galileo was clearly stretching the truth when he maintained at his trial in 1633 that after 1616 he had never considered heliocentrism to be possible. Admitting otherwise would have increased the penance he was given, but would not have endangered his life, since he agreed to renounce the heresy — and in fact it would have spared him even the threat of torture.”
“The cardinal inquisitors realized that the case against Galileo would be very weak without an admission of guilt, so a plea bargain was arranged. He was told that if he admitted to having gone too far in his treatment of heliocentrism, he would be let off with a light punishment. Galileo agreed and confessed that he had given stronger arguments to the heliocentric proponent in his dialogue than to the geocentric champion. But he insisted that he did not do so because he himself believed in heliocentrism, Kelly said. Rather, he claimed he was simply showing off his debating skills”
“Kelly also noted that by the practice of the time, Galileo’s guilty plea, which denied actual belief in the heresy”
“n his later years Galileo insisted on the truth of the geocentric solar system, Kelly said. The story that after he formally renounced the motion of the earth at his sentencing he muttered, “And yet it moves,” is a romantic invention of a later generation.”
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/the-truth-about-galileo-and-his-conflict-with-the-catholic-church
AS I HAVE SAID, YOU AND MUGGY ARE RUBES WHO ARE CONNED INTO RETROFITTED HISTORICAL NARRATIVES
anyone with social IQ > 0 would say “WAIT A MINUTE…how likely is it that someone would insist on some (and at the time unproven) scientific theory under threat of torture? Does that make any rational sense? Is it worth it?” and quickly realize the fantasy for what it is.
Muggy and Phil cannot pick up on the fantasy within history…which is why they are autistic.
i did’t know that much about the story. you have autism.
next swank will tell us that the roman priesthood isn’t dominated by homos. “protestant lies!” swank will exclaim. “nordic lies!”
you don’t know much about any story, because you don’t know them as stories.
There are no liberal or conservativr intellrctuals only puppets regurgitating variations on what people like stephen jay gould say. Anyone genuinely interesing like sailer gets banished to a mental home or sent ito exile or called a nazi. True stry.
When media organs serve as ideological gatekeepers, widespread ignorance becomes unavoidable. —ron unz
UUHHH HAVVVVVEE AA DREAM!!!
Hollywood loves making movies about 70IQ black people ‘standing up’ for their ‘rights’ and being brave. Never made a movie about 170IQ Enoch Powell correctly calling what immigration would bring and being banished from respectable discourse.
Powell should have been PM. Not proven paedophiles like Heath.
Thankfully you don’t need a 170IQ to say this stuff or be a professor of classics. You can just use common sense like the alcholic high school dropout at the bookies.
I said that to my psychiatrist – people that use instinct are ‘smarter’ and more well adapted to securing resources than people that attempt to think abstractly by letting jews think for them.
Like Powell, I was told I was ‘mad’.
pretty sure you have no mental illness pill.
except the sort that takes psychiatry seriously.
classics is the least competitive course at oxford. i think geology is second.
“pretty sure you have no mental illness pill.
except the sort that takes psychiatry seriously.”
Autism is cured by not taking psychiatry seriously.
phil does not believe I have schizoaffective disorder.
all mental illness and much physical illness is just the mirror of a sick society.
Essentially, racketeering is defined as offering a dishonest service to fill a need that would not naturally exist.
For an example, a “security company” may engage in racketeering by offering protection from break-ins, when they themselves are organizing and committing break-ins in the area.
mugabe must admit he was wrong again. i though it meant bid rigging and price rigging, that is, creating monopolies artificially.
but the above definition describes 80% of the US economy and about the same of all developed economies.
swank doesn’t understand this because bodybuilding.
Feeling like a total failer is harsh.
The Lesser-Known Symptoms of Depression
there are two things which motivate people to be “winners”.
1. they can’t stand being inferior.
2. they fear that on their deathbed they will think, “what a waste. i didn’t do anything.”
both of these are extremely powerful and extremely stupid.
it’s like three men in a boat playing card in the middle of the far south pacific. no food. no water. no hope of a passing ship. and they all still care passionately about winning the card game.
The motivation is to improve the quality of life of yourself and those you like, to have the power to do what you want, when you want, to influence society and to have more status.
3. they know the time is going to pass anyway, so they make up a game they like to play and then hope to win at it as early and often as powerful.
if i choose to pass my time playing cards, that’s fine.
it’s only when i don’t want to play cards and play cards anyway that being a ‘winner’ or ‘loser’ doesn’t matter.