Please place all off-topic comments for week April 1 to April 7 here.
Meanwhile here’s a lecture by Jordan Peterson on Marxism:
I don’t think high IQ Mrs Garrett from the Facts of Life would have liked this lecture
Now that the weather is warming up, I am rocking me a tight fluorescent green Facts of Life T-shirt, with blue jeans, cowboy boots and a cowboy hat. I was so scared I’d be the laughing stock of the local honky tonk if I put the FOL shirt on, but instead I was invited to sit with a table full of drunk bridesmaids, who all thought it was so adorable they bought me shots:
Pumpkin Person 
I was playing a video game and thinking at the same time about central banking. So I did a bit of research over the past half hour on central banking and found out now no country in the world does not have a central bank or has a currency pegged to a fiat currency (with the overthrow of Iraq, Syria).
Theres a book I have on my to do list called the Creature of Jeykll Island which purports to explain how a syndicate of private individuals blackmailed Woodrow Wilson into creating in effect a giant counterfeit operation.
So I read up on the Chinese central bank and soviet one because I wanted to see if the Pigs were really the capitalists and basically assumed counterfeiting powers when they came to power. It seems these countries still did fiat currency as far as I can tell under ‘hardcore’ eras of communism under Mao and Stalin respectively.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aron_Sheinman
This guy sounds interesting. First communist central bank governor ended up working for the state tourist agency and claiming British citizenship. Translation – shifted to another deep state role involving international travel and given clemency by Rothschild like Khorodovsky was after he was forced out by Putin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Gerashchenko
This guy is another interesting one. It sounds like he was on team putin when the jews under larry summers came to ‘liberalise’ the economy in the 90s reading between the lines.
Anyways, back to the main topic, Ive always suspected that central banks are actually a way of maintaining a de facto hereditary aristocracy in most nations as with or without the governing bodies knowledge, I suspect funny money is printed to private individuals for whatever they want. They probably have an agreement Id imagine not to do anything ridiculous like buy every single football club….
And fiat money is basically enslavery when you can make someone do anything with infinite amounts of it.
The foundation of the bank was part of the implementation of the New Economic Policy. On 3 October 1921, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (VTsIK), passed a resolution for the founding of the State bank of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. This was followed by a similar resolution passed by Sovnarkom on 10 October 1921. It began operations on 16 November 1921. In February 1922 Lenin described the State Bank as a “a bureaucratic paper game”, comparing it to a Potemkin village in a letter to Aron Sheinman who he accused of being a “Communist-mandarin childishness”.[1] In 1923 it was transformed into the State Bank of the USSR. It was placed under the jurisdiction of Narkomfin.[2] The Soviet state used Gosbank, primarily, as a tool to impose centralized control upon industry in general, using bank balances and transaction histories to monitor the activity of individual concerns and their compliance with Five-Year Plans and directives. Gosbank did not act as a commercial bank in regard to the profit motive. It acted, theoretically, as an instrument of government policy. Instead of independently and impartially assessing the creditworthiness of the borrower, Gosbank would provide loan funds to favored individuals , groups and industries as directed by the central government.
Anyways, sometimes doesn’t sit right with me. In Mankiws economics textbook, he describes fractional reserve banking they way you’d think the system should operate. But some of you have mentioned a central bank literally prints money from nothing to do whatever it wants basically and isn’t just a lender of last resort or a price setter of money.
And here the communists basically have central bank that sounds exactly like the Federal Reserve or Bank of England, except these institutions are theoretically independent from central government.
I have to think if you have a tool that allows you to do anything to anyone by waving paper at them, you would take the tool and use it intuitively.
Some contradictions to my views:
1. Some central banks really are accountable to the ‘people’ – although most are “independent” whatever the fuck that means.
2. It rarely comes up as a topic in other things I read about power and political manoeuvring. So maybe it is a bureaucratic functionary after all.
3. I’ve never worked for a central bank, but I have worked for a regulator and I can safely say these bodies are not ‘independent’ from political interference from elected representatives…which is a good thing to me.
4. I don’t want to spend time but surely most central banks are audited?
Otherwise what I’d expect is that elites band together to create a central bank to control the populace under some sort of agreement not to print tons of money to convert into other elites funny money and order their slaves around.
[redacted by pp, April 1, 2018]
Yeah theres another contradiction. Elites would just print money and exchange it for other elites slaves at will. You’d have zimbabwe situations of african lairds printing money for dollars to get infinite american hookers.
yes. what i know is the fed. the fed is half private/half public. this is odd.
theoretically the fed matches its money printing with assets. it has a balance sheet like any other business. but in reality money printing/lowering interest rates is a yuge transfer of wealth to the already rich. it doesn;t show up in consumer inflation, because the rich don’t consume much more than the poor, except in real estate.
fractional reserve banking is much older than central banks. it originated in northern italy more than 400 years ago. it used to be every bank issued its own currency. this is a problem, though some libertarians wish this was still the way things were done.
imagine prices being posted for every bank. or just for large banks. how much does that cost in US Bank dollars? in Wells Fargo dollars? in Chase dollars? it’s stupid. much more efficient is, how much does that cost in Fed dollars?
if all these bank notes are fungible with gold then the price would just be in gold, but maybe some businesses would insist on a haircut from certain banks.
If Putin wanted to – couldn’t he just tell the russian central bank governor to print 2b and put it into a Caymans bank account?
Im just trying to say where the boundaries are on this stuff because it was never explained to me during my degree programme.
The Peoples Bank of China seems similar to the soviet bank.
It makes me think maybe governments around the world are all duped into adopting a fiat money system and theres some sort of ‘hole’ or ‘weakness’ the the computing systems they use to “print” credit that allows select individuals to take money at will.
At the end of the day you have to reason why a fiat system is objectively better than a sound money system. And the academic research is said to be ‘ambigious’ on this topic in wikipedia.
I don’t know the answers to this stuff. Im happy to think Ive gone too schiz on this and you have these mandarins placed there to oversee everything works in a kind of inertia free from private interests in all 200 or so central banks.
It just seems so odd people wouldn’t try to print funny money for themselves.
I.e. modern seignorage.
I wouldn’t have any idea what the answer is easier. The gold/silver standard ideas aren’t taken seriously, since that’s how it was back during the time of great booms and busts and up until the end of the Great Depression– nobody wants to go back to that.
Martin Armstrong seems to argue a gold standard never even existed:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/fictional-world-of-gold-standards/
I’m going to suggest people in genetics have known about HBD for the past 30 years and are not allowed publish papers saying that.
Just like any psychologist in the area of cognitive testing knows about racial differences. Or any high school football coach or teacher can see differences in the races of man when the kids come into the gym or classroom.
I also bet theres genetic evidence proving ashkenazi jews are not related to sephardic/mizrahi/berber jews and have more in common with armenians and georgians + plus hypertrophy from cousin marriage selecting IQ (but same underlying character and behaviour traits).
I also bet theres plenty of evidence showing homosexuality, transgenderism and other sexual fetishes increase in number with how advanced a society is. I.e. there are litlle or no homosexual papua new guineans, transgender papua new guneans or paedophile papua new guineans.
These are hunches.
i attribute black athletic performance to allen’s rule. they have a high surface area to volume compared to cold climate peoples. so to south asians, but south asians can’t play any sport well except field hockey and squash. why is that? despite their proportions they tend to be gracile, un-muscular.
rr still believes in the twitch fiber theory.
i am taller than the majority of nba players…sitting down.
i rest my case.
I’m not a reductionist. I don’t think it’s *just* fibers. I’ve elaborated on the view here:
yes. n/a had a post on that. homosexuality increases in frequency with inequality.
Homosexuality and cuckodry don’t exist in hunter-gatherer societies (or at least so anthropologists claim).
However, in simple agricultural societies, both homosexuality and cuckodry shoot thru the roof. Civilized peoples have those traits to a slightly lesser extent, but they’re much more open about, because being a fag or cuckold fetishist in a subsistence farming society or undeveloped country usually gets you killed.
http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/third-gender-native-american-tribes
There is something right here call ”google”, it’s not always that it’s a bad source of information for this ”erudicks” of this blog.
I think sexual deviancy is racial or cultural, regardless it’s something very persistent and doesn’t have to do with advancement.
Tentacle porn has always been Japanese.
Philosopher: “I also bet theres genetic evidence proving ashkenazi jews are not related to sephardic/mizrahi/berber jews and have more in common with armenians and georgians…”
Good guess. You’re right. Here are some sources:
https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/5/1/61/728117
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806353/
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2016.00141/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2017.00087/full
Ashkenazi Jews are not Khazar. Elhaik was refuted. Read Razib’s article on this.
No, Im not going to wait for evidence from academia to say anything.
My method is this:
Im going to use common sense because I think despite my neurosis, I still have a lot more of it than most people.
In cant blame jews for central asia and ancient greece obviously lol.
It might be the same way a culture embraces a cult – like romans stopped worshipping jupiter and started worshipping jesus and changing behaviours accordingly in terms of charitable giving and law and order.
There might be a kind of random element to it.
I could easily see people believing in another ridiculous cult if jesus wasn’t successful.
The reason why jesus was successful however in europe and not the middle east or asia is because europeans wanted to be nice to each other as such. The cult resonated.
So maybe the sexuality isnt totally non resonant either. Maybe people really do get these urges biologically.
Ive watched 2 mins of that video. I bet he doesn’t say the word ‘jews’ in any context even though its the main reason why we have had both communism and identity politics in the west.
Its frustrating.
Its like that documentary Robert linked to from the BBC. Never mentions them even though every single topic is one of their social engineering gambits.
For example advertising was invented by Edward Bernays, a jew who was the nephew of Sigmund Freud who basically ran a hyper tribal cult.
Yeah as gypsy was saying, some people have more common sense than others. Its a mystery in life. You have these kids, maybe for maturity or rebelliousness reasons start believing in these abstract explanations for basic stuff or as maybe youre more right in that maybe cognitively you can get seduced by pretty words in the right order above a certain IQ level.
It is a weird one though how common sense is U shaped on the graph.
From everything I’ve seen, privately, very high IQ non autistic people tend to rely on common sense much more than ‘studies’ and ‘academia’ and ‘the media’. just like people who smell of urine at the local bookies or racetrack do at the other end.
Anyone who defies Ockham’s razor in their reasoning should be ignored with prejudice.
It’s that simple.
“Common sense” should probably be more strictly defined as the ability to use Ockham’s razor and inductive reasoning in concert to predict future behaviour. It’s an entirely legitimate discursive and critical approach.
People rejecting it in favour of book-long explanations of why this academic or that has denied reality in favour of a razor-circumventing explanations, are failing to use the most effective critical heuristics available to them. Either they’re extraordinarily gullible, with weak thinking skills, or they’re being bilked.
My money is that people are systematically being bilked, not because of a top-down conspiracy but because those on the hard-left in particular are in denial about the failure of their economic and social programmes. Convincing a new generation to repeat their error, the definition of insanity.
Further further further: A thought on adaptation, whilst one may have the ability to adapt, adaptation requires effort and willpower, many a time I have wondered why a competent and able individual in one field cannot transfer this to another, I think the magnitude of the undertaking overwhelms them and the prerequisite determination is something that fails them.
This is something like training someone out of their habits. I’ll probably have more thoughts on it later, if I post here within the month again.
Why do you use “common sense” only to refer to social intelligence? Ive encountered highly educated people (who I’m sure had triple digit IQs — some were in successful careers) who struggled with simple tasks lile turning on a microwave, reverse parking a medium-sized sedan, and sorting clothes to be put in a washing machine.
Very sad!
Yeah, it’d be interesting to see cultural differences in common sense. I suspect that people who have the highest common sense seem to have the longest longevity in life or benefit from capitalist society. It’s funny because capitalist society seems to reinforce eugenics on a mass scale, build niches for people, promote diversity, yet there are still people who hate on it. It’s surprising because capitalism is like its very own ecosystem.
Also, what does one think of average IQs of different civilizations? Does anyone believe that all advanced societies have the same IQs? These are important questions to ask ourselves if we want to establish a mentally/physically healthy society that can perform to its utmost ability.
Chomsky says exactly the same about post-modernism so not all Marxist buy identity politics :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WwTfHv5dpPw
Chomsky isn’t a Marxist. He’s an anarchist. I think he’s also a tacit Zionist.
http://www.jewishmag.com/148mag/molotov_jewish_wife/molotov_jewish_wife.htm
Good article on stalin and molotov.
Given the Philosophers constant ramblings about that Devils Chessboard book, I looked it up on Google to find what it’s really about and came across this interesting article;
https://www.thenation.com/article/what-is-the-deep-state/
I’ve always thought there was a deep state but different people always have radically different ideas of what it is (for instance, conservatives and John Birchers think it’s composed of Marxists, paleocons and alt-rghters think it’s composed of neocons, liberals think it’s composed of white supremacists/the patriarchy or the military-industrial complex).
In other words, may just be a bunch of bullshit.
Deep state stuff from when I was 11 years old.
I knew about the secret gov technology from a young age.
I visited the museums in Roswell New Mexico, Read books on UFO’s.
(Secret technology quote quote)
Have you ever posted/commented of Stephen Hawkings (who was recently buried)? I thought you mightve recently but I couldn’t find anything.
Reflective feedback and pointing inward are key to creating a self-model in a computer. A model of a person can be created but the model must have a self-model to be of any use in the A.I. sense where it becomes able to reason and follow commands and learn. It can only have empathy and model others if it can model itself first. Reflective feedback mirrors others to model them well internally reflecting internally. The pointing inward. (kitty autisms again)
so if peepee has a y chromosome her strategy is to pretend to be gay then pounce.
“i thought i was gay, but you straightened me out.”
“that’s the nicest thing anyone’s ever said to me peepee.” spread legs.
Women only sometimes think I’m gay when i talk about Oprah. This is true even if the woman herself loves Oprah.
But women NEVER think I’m gay when i talk about Facts of Life.
A lot of really straight guys are erotically obsessed with FOL which as long as they’re only turned on by the later seasons when the girls were adults, is normal, i guess
For me the show’s only purpose is nostalgia because as a kid i would watch the reruns after school with milk and chocolate chip cookies & mrs Garrett always had wise comforting advice. I also liked that Toodie was black and it wasn’t a big deal
Yeah I would bust nuts all over Mrs Garrett, HOT HOT HOT!
peterson knows nothing about anything. sad!
more kitty autisms
prediction comes from experience (common sense)
abstract stuff is not experience.
people in the middle (115-125) only have time for the abstract.
at 130 is fast enough learning you see other things you can’t notice bellow 130.
You do not need to spend all your time on abstract stuff with effort.
15 percent of your time on abstract, not 40 percent so you can notice other things.
Observation for experience for prediction.
Abstract stuff cant be tested but is taught to be used.
not everyone (115-125) go to college.
do have common sense.
people that observer
(((kitty autisms)))
Philosopher was right.
OMG I just read about this.
Of course Im right.
here’s chomsky showing peterson is retarded and dishonest. peterson knows less about marxism than peepee.
so chomsky gets it in the above vid.
he knows that identity politics is an intentional distraction, a means of directing attention away from where it should lie, on economic issues, and yet another means of demonizing the poor, in this case “deplorables”, white trash.
in a sense market fundamentalism is “hate speech” directed at the poor.
Just booked a ticket to see Peterson, Sam Harris and Douglas Murray speak.
I’m not a particular fan of any of them, but its been a long time since I went to a public debate.
The last one I went to was:
‘Did Communism Fail?’ in London.
And the audience voted after hearing everyone’s argument.
My personal opinion was, yes, it improved the working mans life in Europe and America considerably all things told.
So theres something good the jews did, by accident.
There were millions of ukrainians, kulaks and peasents butchered by commissars in China, Russia, Cambodia though.
marx predicted what has happened in western europe, a welfare state. but there was no revolution.
the so-called communist revolutions of the russian empire, china, cuba, etc. were very un-marxist in that the proletariat was a very small part of these countries’ populations. these were lord and peasant societies and small fee holding farmers, crofters, pre-industrial. at the time of the bolshevik revolution the proletariat constituted about 2% of the population of the russian empire.
Total waste of time and money. All obnoxious people.
Peterson does motivate weak people though, so thats nice.
When I hear alt right people bash ‘communists’ and ‘marxists’ I kind of sigh. I would be almost certain if Marx didn’t exist, most people would be indentured labourers at the moment in all but name and the economy would be a lot less advanced.
In fact I doubt a lot of things would even have been invented or mass produced at quality because there would have been no demand – e.g. video games.
This is why I told gypsy it’s important to define liberal. Philosopher is clearly a liberal on economic and foreign policy issues, but an extreme conservative on cultural issues.
Define “extreme conservative on social issues”. I could call you an “extreme liberal” or jim jones cult member.
I define cultural conservative as someone who wants to limit the power of less powerful cultures such as blacks, women, & gays
On the other hand you also oppose Jewish power and Jews are not powerless, but because they’re perceived that way, you’d be considered an extreme cultural conservative, though in reality you’re only moderately culturally conservative
Gypsy argues we’re brainwashed to think liberals are better than conservatives but i think helping the underdog is intrinsically the smart/good thing to do. The real brainwashing is convincing whites they’re still overdogs & so fighting their own interests makes them good liberals.
Maybe that’s just semantics but i think it simplifies things.
I profoundly disagree with you.
If Marx had never existed I believe ideas such as workers unions would have developed independently of his greater, poisonous ideology and it’d be a normal part of the generally accepted economics.
Marx’s broader ideology is the reason the few good elements of his Philosophy find difficulty intergrating themselves into our economic system. Libertarians and reactionaries are deathly afraid of public spending and wage-bargaining precisely because they know it’s giving ground to political opposition.
I often find myself thinking that in the Medieval era a King might have found himself investing the treasury into various projects which would be profitable in the future, and to him this wasn’t “Liberal” or “Socialist”, it was common sense. Had economics kept developing in that vein, rather than having been divided between economic Conservatism and Marxism in its various incarnations, we’d probably have a much more well-administered economy today.
Succinctly, the birth of Marx marked the downfall of the few good ideas he had.
Hi buddy, long time no talk. How you doin’?
Doin’ pretty good.
Studying a shedload of military history and generally avoiding IQ-talk like the plague.
Yoursefl?
Getting married next month you know, staying fit, living it up, and perfecting the lawyering.
small talk like that makes me shudder
This is how mentally sane people interact.
LOL!
Gypsyman, I thought you were attending law school in the UK?
I’ll be attending myself soon, likely in the state of Florida somewhere.
Studying to attend.
I meant I was studying Military History for my own amusement. I might end up attending Sandhurst though, there’s something insubstantial to all these civillian studies.
Chomsky brings up a point about free speech. Im going to be honest and say Im kind of machiavellian about it. I see tv shows like ‘Dear White People’ [redacted by pp, April 2, 2018] – that should be banned. Or those All State ads with black men lording it over Mrs Daisy.
Being frank I don’t believe free speech has unending limits. Especially when our media keeps trying to create war or invasion on the jews enemies and putting millions of people at risk in the Western and muslim worlds…..
Im going to be counter intuitive and say I would block free speech.
In many ways I believe Plato is kind of right. There has to be a an elite of ‘enlightened’ people who can shepherd people to good outcomes for their families and posterity regardless. Plato called them ‘philosophers’. And I suppose thats one of the reason I call myself such, even ironically.
Its the same principle as scientists on scientific matters, or parents over children. I don’t think brainwashed people should be allowed to hear more brainwashing. I would say the same about organised religions teaching children as well.
Langans solution is to actual physical change the cognitive abilities of people so that they couldn’t be brainwashed.
But thats a very extreme thing to me.
I think a more practical solution is for a group of philosophers, like many times in the past to pierce the shroud of insanity, and unfortunately this may mean silencing the snake in the Garden of Eden.
Ill have to think about it more.
Im not a classical liberal in any way. In fact I tend to think most people the promote classical liberalism like the Rothschilds economist magazine tend to be predators or trust fund babies.
I disagree with you completely.
The reason Jew propaganda is so devastating is because there are no other narratives. They own a monopoly on all mass-media, even on the internet [though the internet is a lot less monopolized than other forms such as TV and newspaper].
Monopoly in the media is what should be banned.
Banning ‘Dear White People’ is completely wrong. It’s your impulse to do so because you can’t respond: your response would be banned [politically incorrect].
Monopolies in general should be banned. I sometimes think they should pass a law saying if you own a business, you can’t buy a competing business.
Yes but how would you enforce a ban on media monopolies when the monopoly youre talking about isnt a corporate/legal one but a tribal one? What law could you pass – jews are not allowed own X percent? Im curious. It sounds exactly like what I said but in more bureaucratic language.
Outlawing corporate monopolies would naturally limit tribal monopolies cause it’s much easier for any one tribe to own 6 big companies than 100 small ones. The more centralized power becomes, the less democratic.
The same way YouTube works today. Anyone can set up a channel, people watch what they want. Monopoly is impossible. Since early this year however there has been a crackdown on dissenting view points. I’ve seen ten or so channels banned and Alex Jones recently received a strike despite being controlled opposition & married to a Jewish wife [in my opinion].
Alex Jones got divorced
I recognise we need predators to ‘keep us honest’ though. Evolution can’t proceed without predation. But it increasingly seems obvious predation in humans means a Latin American result where throves of mindless low IQ barbarian idiots replace advanced societies because Master desires cheap labour.
In this way Marx is right when he speculated that capitalism is inherently contradictory in that in the long run, it leads to its own demise via promotion of untermensch coolie and cotton picker breeding.
My 2c.
In the same way I would ban my child from watching Dear White People, i think you can extend it and say I would ban imbeclies from watching it.
The modern west keeps saying it has free speech but how many nationalist populist tv programmes are on tv de facto? Would any radio or tv station let the KKK advertise?
None.
The principle theoretically exists in the West, but de facto – and that is all that matters in the final analysis – we don’t let certain groups say anything they want to the public.
For this reason, I don’t believe in free speech because it never existed anyway and suggest people don’t believe in free speech even when they say they do.
Woudl they let their child watch a speech from Hitler if the school showed it?
Even the Mein Kampf you buy in the shops is heavily edited from its original german publication by our Masters.
The U.S. of today is probably the closest you’ll ever get to free speech.
Of course the media and humanities academia suppresses free speech with a ridiculous amount of PC, but people are free to share all kinds of thought in venues like this.
People seem to forget that in Western European countries it’s a felony to deny the Holocaust, and the Chinese government monitors all activity by its citizens on the Internet and even maintains a “social status” credit score type thing for every Chinese person. It supposedly tracks how many slanderous statements a person makes against the government, in addition to tracking commission of petty crimes like traffic violations and littering……
Right brain people are so talented.
Low latent inhibition
(((perceptive)))
The same movie i’m watching here, the train of repetitive retarded who call other people retards…
To be fair you are also part of it.
But the little and fundamental difference is that i’m right and less uber-stereotypical as most people here just because i use the reasonableness to create my map of reality.
And say name-callings for someone as ”philosopher” is delightfull because he is not alone in the creepy pseudo-philosophy world.
“But the little and fundamental difference is that i’m right ”
Others might say this too.
But the difference again is they are wrong, i fight against my mistakes all the time, most of them hyper-”rationalize” their faults. I’m of the few here who admit mistakes in-debates-against-other-oponents, it’s so rare.
“I’m of the few here who admit mistakes in-debates-against-other-oponents, it’s so rare”
No you didn’t. You still think sexuality is like choosing a favourite colour. Idiot.
never said this PSEUDO-PHILOLPHER…
I said
sexuality IS LIKE colour prefference
AND NOT
sexuality IS EXACTLY LIKE a colour prefference.
Two different things.
It was a COMPARISON, a analogy.
Homossexuality is about sexuality
Colour prefference is about … ”social construct”
BUT
if a man prefer a rose colour than a blue…
Indeed just because morality you call a illusion, [redacted by pp, April 4, 2018]
MOST PART OF THAT TIME, you’re fighting against your
lack of long term memory
reading issues
lack of PRINCIPLES which prevent you to play fair in debate and believe that cheating/ bad semantic manipulation it’s more important than to be factually AND morally correct and or HONEST
…and remember when i admited i was wrong, it’s happened many times AND i’m one of the few ones who clearly admit this because i’m not here to defend my ego as you, repetitive retard and hallucinogenic robot.
AND, in the end,
your ”supposed arrgutment” don’t refute my comment above and this comment about sexuality and colo.r prefference…
LEARN how to answer point by point instead re-create a new debate as often happen in most debates.
You loose again, you must be adapted to be a loser.
I remembered, even i wrote this in my blog… period.
Most people tend to have not so good opinions about homossexuality because human intelligence evolved to solve problems BUT tendentiously in very pragmatic or insensitive ways.
So we even can conclude that humans are badass smarter enough to detect problematic patterns as//in homossexuality, on avg, but…
most of this capacity has been very perverted by human culture-co-evolution where quality is not selected at the same frequency as quantity, because
as you say, or seems… the so-called system’s need/want good workers:
– someone who are cognitively smarter enough to understand and obey their duties
– but not to fight for their own rights [aka, the hidden and often ”scandalous” part of morality].
In the near past you would not had medications [unfortunately ”tested” in inocent creatures] nor freedom and all this partly it’s due because
MORALITY, good use of this… supposedly…
but when we have a retarded as you who like to shot your own foot denying the validation of something that has saved you to live a miserable life within a hospice…
And as i always said and it’s near impossible to deny this….
life IS itself imperfect. Some tolerance to diversity and specially among human beings must be needed.
The fundamental reason you hate homossexuality is that you hate homossexuality.
It’s fundamentally your primitive instinct of hate.
But, yes, i also have good instinctive reasons to hate EVIL heterossexual trash man…
NOT the good ones…
indeed
MOST of crimes/wars/problems in the world are commited by men, and maybe many by bissexual men, proportionally speaking.
women has been too tamed to be capable to destroy the world alone, only when men allow.
MOST SELF-DECLARED philosophers
are not… philosophers/wiser.
Philosophy has been entirely corrupted in its own roots just because most people who feel interest in this matter don’t know what fucking WISDOM is and don’t want to engage in this anyway. Even we can say that many non-official-philosophers are more philosopher than those pill-friends.
But even in the case of bissexual men, they are so rare that it’s impossible to deny the over-super-proportion of heterossexual men, many them who aren’t originally psychopathic engaging in all sort of morally stupid things.
i’m a free speech absolutist, but there should be an amendment dealing with the unique power of mass media. the framers did not envision radio, tv, cinema, etc. the internet has made things feral…but for how long. i would be in favor of legislation restricting the ability of youtube, fb, twitter, etc. from restricting the speech of their users. today there are no such restrictions, because these are private companies. it would be perfectly legal for them to ban everything they didn;t like.
…restricting the ability of youtube, fb, twitter, etc. to restrict
ingthe speech…i’d also appoint judges who’d overturn the “fighting words” exception.
sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
something every american 6 year old knows but which french intellectuals are incapable of understanding. sad!
and identity politics is a pure distraction, because the ONLY complaint certain groups have is lack of economic opportunity. this would not be a problem if the issue was poverty per se. a gay guy has a million x greater chance of dying from AIDS than from being killed by a homophobe. same with dykes and diabetes, because dykes are fat.
if what santo wants is to be liked rather than merely not poor because people don;t like him, he’s being immature.
people dislike people for a million reasons. why should a finite set of “identities” be special? they shouldn’t.
[redacted by pp, april 4, 2018]
“cultural marxism” = the exact opposite of marxism.
allen’s rule would predict that euros and mongos would outperform afros at certain sports.
1. swimming
2. weight-lifting
3. rowing
also any sport which requires competing in the cold.
so norwegians may have a genetic advantage at cross country skiing which they don’t have at long distance running.
the winter olympics is the white olympics.
More like a cultural than genetic advantage. There is no skiing where there is no snow and no mountains. There is no surfing where there are no waves.
i know that afro-tard.
the euro/mongo advantage is predicted from allen’s rule.
i didn;t say the prediction is true.
Scandinavians shouldn’t even be that tall and slender by Allen’s rule. So that’s an anomaly. There aren’t actual rules and laws in biology like there are in physics.
Physical laws affect biological systems. Some selection pressures are stronger than others. In the case of Scandinavians, sexual trumps natural.
Biology is constrained by physical laws, but it doesn’t have laws on its own.
allen’s rule + bergmann’s rule.
nordics are tall. they are not slender.
They are definitely not stockier than Southern Europeans.
same pattern in the americas. fuegians and plains indians tall and robust. inca and amazonians very short.
given the same geometry, surface area to volume decreases as body mass increases. thus bergmann’s rule is an extention of allen’s rule. but it is not true of arctic peoples.
The Inca would be an exception because the andine Altiplano is a cold area.
La Paz’s annual mean temperature is 8.8°C (min. 7.3°C in June, max. 10.5°C in November)
Oslo’s annual mean temperature is 10.3°C
(min. -0.4°C in January, max. 22.3°C in July)
Depending on whether bodies adapt to the mean temperature or to the extremes, the Incas should be more cold-adapted than the Norvegians, or only adapted to a 6.9°C difference is coldest month temperature or to a 11.8°C difference in warmest month temperature.
Fuck I misreported Oslo’s temperatures.
The annual mean is actually 6.7°C, max is 17.7°C in July, min is -2.9°C in January.
So that’s just slightly colder than La Paz. My point still stands though, the climate of the andine highlands justifies no white climate adaptations.
…extension…
much stockier.
same applies to china people.
even within the prc, northern chinks are taller and beefier. viets and malays are even shorter.
sumo has been dominated by mongolians for 15 years. the mongols of genghis khan were 6′ on average.
How do you explain all the tall peoples of Africa then?
http://cdn3.chartsbin.com/chartimages/l_1150_b831d4f831204d4d2416d625e3064607
Height variation seems to follow calorie intake more closely than temperature.
some of africa’s peoples are tall. some aren’t. i expect the tall SSAs inhabit or are descended from those who inhabited hot desert.
the tall frame is lankier than the short. short people with the proportions of the wodaabe and tutsi don’t exist. it’s allen’s rule again. in this case greater height made greater surface area to volume possible.
but why aren’t arabs taller? and why aren’t arctic peoples taller? maybe they haven’t inhabited their current climate long enough? the arctic peoples of alaska, canada, and greenland have not been in these areas for very long. i don’t know about the arctic peoples of the old world. the sami/laps are also shorter than nordics. but these peoples do display allen’s rule in their weeble/roly-poly proportions. when spencer wells visited arctic siberia he commented on this. and he himself has danish and british ancestry.
and these are just averages with yuge overlap.
so for example, in the US all of the tall and robust are taken up by american football.
so that an american soccer player facing the italian national team for the first time was overawed by how big they all were. as big as american football players.
but if italy had a rugby team it would consistently lose to nz and za.
regarding american football, the ethnicity which has the reputation of being the biggest/bulkiest is polish americans. this may not be true anymore. idk.
The theory of the bell curves is that it is very meaningful at the extremes. And blacks are an anomaly since they completely dominate whites in sports which are substantially dependent on height:
-Basketball
-US football
-Sprinting
And no, as a whole, height doesn’t give much of an edge in most of a soccer’s team positions. But the French team is still disproportionately black too.
Other anomalies are the Incas and Himalayans who aren’t too tall and stocky to my knowledge.
I think those rules are bogus or as you said, many peoples migrated to their current location to early to adapt to the local environments.
There are no black skinned pygmies in Amazonia. Probably because settlement is too recent and they lacked the genetic diversity needed to adapt.
repost after you decide to stop lying.
sprinting does not depend on height.
bolt is freakishly tall for a sprinter.
even more than with weightlifting or sumo there are yuge diminishing returns to too tall and to too short.
the statistical peak is about 6’1″ in ALL of these sports.
Height, and more specifically longer legs is important in sprinting, I say it as a high school Normandy champion.
african americans are not representative of SSAs, nor of west africans.
they have been bred to pick cotton and cut cane.
sad!
blacks have two allen’s rule advantages in basketball.
1. long fingers. much better control of the ball.
2. long arms.
The average arm-span-to-height ratio [i.e., ape index] of an NBA player is 1.063.
compared to mine of 1.038.
peepee needs me inside her stat!
Blacks and whites of the same height, blacks will have longer extremities and shorter trunk (IIRC on the trunk) on average.
yes. i meant to say, “two additional advantages”.
blacks have a higher center of gravity, much longer forelegs/calfs, and less to lift. this increases their vertical. “white men can’t jump.”
bill cosby even has a joke about this, how his calfs were so wimpy he’d wear extra pairs of socks. it may be blacks’ calf muscles are just as big but they’re stretched out, so they look smaller.
bigger people consume more calories afro-tard. otherwise they starve to death.
Lol of course no, calorie intake causes people to grow bigger. Which is why height and weight increased as calorie intake increased without people becoming inherently more glutton.
santo is legit a mentally retarded mongoloid with dyslexia or something
coming from you… THANK YOU CHUCHU!!!
One of the most dumbest commenter of all times of this blog call me a mentally retarded boingolloyd and or with dyslexia…
you’re a low class version of that hispanic-supremacistic guy. Someone who have ”pride” to be morroccan must be gazed…
You didnt even get his nationality right… proving his point.
haha.
Also, if he has “pride” and that is bad, then having pride would be good.
LOL.
Havent seen JS here in a long time.
afro has been saying he’s going to get married in one month for five years.
gay marriage is now legal in france, so he might be telling the truth.
How is to fuck a different prostitute every day Bugi**
that’s a brownzilian thing. i wouldn;t know.
So you’re without sex since…. one decade*
childless,
single,
alcoholic,
retard.. isn’t*
No women want to have sex with you…
such a poor sooo..
i’m strongly attracted to dogs.
You’re mentally sick beast.
I will refresh you
i don’t think your repetitive ”jokes” has been some impact here, well, you have some stupid fans…
You’re not that GENIUS as you believe…
it’s sad isn’t***
Your entire escape is
AT LEAST
I’M A GENIUS ”WITH”
A SUPER HIGHER IQ
BUT SOCIETY HATES ME
I tell you, your escape is wrong too.
One of the reasons why white TRA$$$H race is that trash can be observed just looking at you here…
Santo got married 59 times.
Pill still watch porn x because he is
virgin…
LOL! When did I say I want to be married for 5 years?
He said you said youd get married every coming month for the past 5 years.
Haha! Nope.
next month afro will say he’s getting married in one month.
bet on it!
Yeah, we can bet everything on it, cause April 2018 is the first (and I hope the last) time I can say I’m getting married next month.
I must have told you I was getting married next year, but I told you this last year…
Alcoholism ruined your brain my dude.
Super Troopers II will also be in theatres this month.
it ridicules french canadians. that’s a “twofer”.
I wonder why Arctics (notably Inuits) have such high suicide rates.
Interesting how the lowest suicide rates in the world are across the equator. Interestingly Italy and Greece share the low suicide rate of the hot countries along that belt. None of the warm Mediterranean countries have suicide rates over 9.9 per 100,000, most are lower than 5 per 100,000.
I’m not sure why suicide rates are higher above and below the equator. I was thinking cold weather but I can’t explain why Africans from a tropical environment would be committing suicide.
I think that weather definitely has an effect. I can’t explain why tropical weather would lead to high suicide rates. Perhaps it’s poverty such as in North Korea, Central Africa and India.
Inuit suicide rates are very interesting to me too.
“Although burdensomeness to kin provides a plausible explanation for some suicides among the elderly, it strains credulity to argue that it would be beneficial to a healthy adolescent’s reproductive success to end his or her life permanently, regardless of the current mating prospects. Such suicides are likely to be nonadaptive byproducts of evolved mechanisms that malfunction (Wakefield, 2005).”
http://sci-hub.tw/10.1037/a0018413
How funny is that? EP is nothing but a bunch of just-so stories—hypotheses that cannot be empirically verified. Anyone can make up a good-sounding story to fit the data. Evolutionary psychologists should just write children’s tales. That’s all their work is anyway.
Jeesus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Funny right?
All soft sciences are just-so stories, they aren’t science.
I love funny stories
Isn’t this a funny story?
yet another example of how human behavior depends on the culture to which one belongs. look at guyana’s and sri lanka’s high rate. likely the indian indentured servants brought their culture of suicide with them to guyana.
more than that, suicide rates are not equally reliable from one country to another. islam and the roman church consider suicide to be a mortal sin and an embarrassment to the family and the memory of the suicide.
https://www.redbubble.com/people/indecentdesigns/works/30544659-facts-of-life-jo?body_color=black_triblend&p=triblend-tee&print_location=front&size=medium&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=g.pla+notset&country_code=US&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIq_r32PSc2gIVTgwrCh1_mAlPEAQYAiABEgKYPvD_BwE#&gid=1&pid=1
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-cancels-forced-asylum-seeker-deportations-after-deal-with-un-1.5973475
I FUCKING TOLD YOU THEY DONT BELIEVE IT. YOU KEEP SAYING IM A ‘RACIST’ AND THE PEOPLE THAT INVENTED THE CONCEPT KEEP BEING ‘RACIST’ AND SENDING US THE FUCKING BIlLL. ARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
“Superior cognitive abilities are generally associated with positive outcomes such as academic achievement and social mobility. Here, we explore the darker side of cognitive ability, highlighting robust links between pattern detection and stereotyping. Across 6 studies, we find that superior pattern detectors efficiently learn and use stereotypes about social groups.”
Replace the word ‘game’ with ‘study’
soylent green is made out of people. it’s made out of peeeeeeople!
alcoholic ”people” are inferior losers who become addicted with alcohol and blame society by their mistakes, i mean, life = stereotype
Alcoholic people are also viewed as violent.
[there are good alcoholic people]
pseudo-philosophers are inferior losers who believe they are wiser but they are just cognitively confused, i mean, dumb, and often affectively deficient people who use philosophy to spread their own absolute lack of wisdom = stereotype.
[there are good pseudo-philosophers or good-intentioned pseudos]
Most of pseudo-philosophers use philosophy brand to spread their hyper-subjectivization of reality, i mean, change the world in their own belly button.
both of the most prolific commenters here [80% of their comments are basically the same thing or obey no more than five subjects] are
CLEVER SILLIES.
Pumpkin can you explain to your readers why your taste in pop culture is so bad.
Really bad.
Youve mentioned some shows you watch now, and I have to say….
What do you think of the Kardashians. Theres magical people in those so must like it I assume.
Theres actually a good documentary series from Morgan Freeman called Through the Wormhole I sometimes watch. Its very good.
Basically if theres a black host, its seems to me you think the programme is better.
I actually think watching a documentary on Kanye West would be interesting. Kanye has ‘problems’. Like I said about Quincy Jones – if a white man said and did the exact same things Kanye has for the past 8 years, he would be without doubt called totally insane. Its only when Kanye checks himself into a clinic and wears slippers in public that the penny finally drops.
This is what I mean about the magic negro effect.
I sometimes think you can be a killer and people will say ‘oh thats just his poverty’.
Deal used to keep implying blacks had no agency. I thought it was hilarious.
I have a lot of black friends and they actually find it patronising when you say things like ‘legacy of colonialism’ to them. I never mention my racial views. I keep saying diversity is brilliant in the office if im asked.
I sometimes wonder how many people are like me and find the whole thing naueseating and see a black person in their office and immediately think ‘sympathy hire’ or something of the ilk. I remember I kept joking with my black friend that he was an affirmative action hire and he needed to learn from me in case he got found out. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
He was a smart guy though.
There was a gay guy in the office last year and in the end I said to my manager that the reason he acts weird towards me is that he knows I know hes gay and don’t want to talk to him. My manager said – “Philosopher, just to let you know first of all, we respect diversity here”. And then she talked HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Maybe it’s just
in your head…
only if he was a hopeless gay man who don’t find a attractive, intellectually, psychologically, physically, to feel attracted to you…
well, most women don’t feel isn’t pill*
I think if youre a black with no criminal record and a 120+ IQ, you are set for life in the brainwashed west imo.
Pumpkin says this is ‘only fair’.
I find it bizarre to be honest. A lot of western countries didnt even participate in slavery and never had a black population until Israel started sending its unwanted immigrants.
Sailer makes a very good point that a lot of AA is for african immigrants as opposed to the descendants of slavery.
I get the feeling the people that push this stuff are a bit like Deal and just assume they are ‘all the same’ and lack any agency or historical give and take.
I bet someone could convince Deal she was man with enough time and alcohol.
DIMONA (ISRAEL) (AFP) – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday that an electronic fence along the Israel-Egypt border has saved the Jewish state from jihadist attacks or what he believes would be worse — a tide of African migrants.
“Were it not for the fence, we would be faced with… severe attacks by Sinai terrorists, and something much worse, a flood of illegal migrants from Africa,” Netanyahu’s office quoted him as telling a development conference in the southern Israel desert town of Dimona.
I keep saying it. But nobody will listen so ill make it really really really simple.
The man who told Bill Gates saving Africa is great is probably an Israeli citizen or potential one.
But,
**He DOES NOT believe in what he is saying to Bill.**
So no matter how much Bill helps Africa, it doesn’t change the fact that he was TRICKED.
LET ME REPEAT.
HE WAS TRICKED.
Dont you want to know the reason he was tricked?
Dont you want to know why the Israelis dont believe in what they tell Bill?
There is 0% doubt in my mind, bill goes to all these human rights charity galas and UN functions and doesn’t know the whole thing is a psychopathic scam. Its so obvious to me that they dont believe in what they pretend to believe.
I guarantee you the jew involved with the UN refugee commission or whatever its called or the jew organising refugess ferry tickets for a charity doesn’t believe in what the UN or the charity does the way bill does. You can bet your house on it.
THis is what happens when you have no theory of mind. Its blindness leading to MADNESSS.
how can bill be that retarded? you’re suggesting i could trick him like a 9 year old kid
Im not saying Im immune to cults myself. But Im a lot less likely to stay in one even if successfully tricked. Bill has been helping africa for 20 years and he never woke up once in the morning and thought – why is africa such barbaric place? HMMMM
HMMMM
GOTTA THINK ABOUTHATAONE
IS IT
COLONIALISM?
IS IT
LACK OF WOMENZ RITES?
IS IT
WE NEED MO MONEH?
LACK OF OPIODS?
A DAMAGED CHASIS?
A WRONG TURN?!
HMMMMM
CANT QUITE FIGURE OUT WHAT IM DOING. MUST BE GOOD. MEDIA SAYS IT GOOD. I AM GOOD. THANK YOU MEDIA. YOU SO GENEROUS. SO GENEROUS. I AM GOOD. GOOD IS WHAT MEDIA SAY IS GOOD. MEDIA IS GOOD. GOOD IS MEDIA.
(Bill Gates exact thought process in 1997)
Everybody watch these 2 videos. And see if you can any similarities. Ill pay you to watch these. Just DO IT.
ITS BECAUSE WE JUST HAVENT TRIED HARD ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so now there are these supposed genetic IQ scores posted on shoe’s and lion’s.
where do these come from?
they’re obviously fake.
even if true.
Maybe based on that you new genomic IQ predictor i blogged about recently:
It would be interesting to get a random sample of people from different races to send in their spit to see if it supports HBD
How expensive is it?
$100 per test commercial prices
Today in morning i spent excessive time answering the SAME FUCKING SHIT…
This blog make me waste time with creepy stupid people.
DNA methylation ‘predicts’ certain traits, some low variance explained (educational attainment) others higher (smoking). Exciting times. I await future research. I bet other individual differences will be shown to be partly caused by methylation too.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/03/294116
peepee has been crying every day for hours after she found out that chris langan is…
1. a theist.
2. alt-right.
cognitive theoretic model of the universe
I kind of get the idea but, self-reference needs stability like a balanced mind so that it can self-generate by prediction.
So in essence self-reference need to simulate the world and make a preferential action. Social prediction as a self and external world model. Not just self-reference but stability from the generality of social stimulation to make internal reference creative and well rounded in internalized connectivity self-evolution.
Humans constantly lean and the brain does not fall apart. This self-reference is what is needed for stable A.I. – The ability to change and still be stable.
generality in internal self-reference.