The comment section of future articles will be moderated more strictly to keep the conversations on-topic.
Going forward, all off-topic discussions should take place in this thread and future open threads.
Open thread Feb 27, 2018: All off-topic comments belong here
27 Tuesday Feb 2018
Posted in Uncategorized
Pumpkin Person 
Dear, Pumpkin.
Please tell me if you will watch my video (Explaining Intelligence 5)
I understand if you do not have time, the video is just 6 minutes.
The philosopher is Right, I have some kind of psychosis.
If you are not going to watch it I would prefer you not post my comment. But you can post it if you wish, this is your blog.
I understand now my mom has the mind of a child. A mom is not supposed to be a child. I told my therapist I wish my mom had an adult mind. Because then I could have a connection with here I do not have. I was very sad.
A mature adult is able to mentor a child. I felt alone.
You may post my comment now pumpkin.
I am not as invested in you watching is as I was before.
Thank you.
try harder.
over one month it will make no difference.
over a year you’ll notice the difference.
over a decade you’ll be who you want to be.
You think Illuminaticat is gay?
He has a messed up personal life, if everything he’s saying is true.
no. i think that whenever you make an effort you should have an erection, penis or clitoris should be fully erect.
DUDE!
STOP!
BE YOURSELF!
Alan Walker – Alone
I am not Alone
To avoid the logical inconsistency of off-topics comments being on-topics, it could be labelled free-topic thread – without-topic would also be inconsistent 😉
Good job Philosofool!
In fairness, Philosopher’s comments are generally very high quality even though they were off-topic. And now we have a place for them.
Gondwana comments about food, more than I talk about jews. At least jews are HBD related! Who cares if apple pie is better with whipped cream or ice cream?!
In my opinion, ice cream by the way.
Aren’t you bored Phil? You need something more exciting to study, like Erich Von Manstein’s manuevers in WW2, it’ll knock your socks off.
All sweet foods go great with coffee, in my opinion.
coffee is for losers.
its sole legitimate purpose is as a substitute for alcohol.
Yes, coffee replaced alcohol as the most commonly accepted way of altering one’s mind to get through this mundane, boring life.
http://humanprogress.org/blog/how-alcohol-and-caffeine-helped-create-civilization?utm_content=buffer2e683&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
And black coffee does go good with any dessert…ill admit.
If you’ve got a problem with coffee you’re sick in the head.
As far as lead and crime, has anyone made the connection between lead and school shooters???
Doubt it would explain anything.
Sailer has a story from a rabbi in the WAPO. Its kind of crazy how people can’t see the media is a jew carnival mirror.
https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/clownworld.jpeg?w=500&h=438
I keep forgetting Bruce Jenner was an Olympic athlete.
Honestly, all joking aside, does anyone think his transition is either a publicity stunt or more jew trolling?
I came up with the concept of ‘dark trolling’ to explain things like the Saudis offering to fund mosques near 9-11 as a sign of ‘mutual respect’ a few years ago. I think ‘Caitlin’ is an example of dark trolling ‘tolerant’ people.
I look forward to more high-quality discussion. Thanks.
Passive Aggression as usual
“Genetic variation gets selected against for traits important for survival therefore intelligence has low genetic variation in humans ”
What are the evidences for that ? (you didn’t answer on the other thread)
Ronald Fisher and others. I’ll get references later.
You should write an article on it.
“There’s no fucking way that’s a 140 question, it’s easy as pie and I’m calling shenanigains.
My IQ is around 135 and I can solve that, no problem and PIQ is my biggest weakness which is what Matrices tend to test.”
@Gypsyman
I was surprised too, I’m guessing different people have difficulty with different questions.
This question I found to be a lot trickier, what do you think?
I can’t solve this puzzle because I cannot hold all the shapes in my mind to figure out the relationships these shapes have to each other that would allow me to know how to select the missing piece that would fill in the gap in the relationships present. The point of the puzzle is the relationships make the other selections incompatible with the gaps shape. I cannot find the gaps shape because too many relationships exit. My mind can’t hold them all.
Question. What is the concrete number of relationships a person with an IQ of 170 can hold in their mind at once?
Depending on time I can solve puzzles 9 * 3 = 27 items = 115 IQ
9 * 9 = 81 items = 145 IQ
scaled score 115 = 13
scaled score 145 = 19
13 – 10 = 3
19 – 10 = 9
3 * 5 = 15
9 * 5 = 44
The 3 and the 8 are the grid 9 times 3 as 115 and 9 time 9 which is 145.
scale score intervals of 5
10 = 100
11 = 105
12 = 110
13 = 115
14 = 120
IQ = (n items / 9)*5 + 100
IQ = (81 / 9)*5 +100
IQ = (9)*5 + 100
IQ = 145
IQ = (n items / 9)*5 + 100
IQ = (126 / 9)*5 +100
IQ = (14)*5 + 100
IQ = 170
Animekitty n items = 27 = IQ 115
Objective IQ by n item held in the head.
27 items for IQ 115
81 items for IQ 145
126 items for IQ 170
is that the question from the end of Outliers?
It’s from the iqtest.dk website. Very accurate, btw (assuming you don’t take it more than once.)
Yeah, that’s tough. But I can solve it.
[gypsy’s answer redacted by pp, feb 28, 2018], delete this post so you don’t invalidate the test.
This is closer to a 140~ question and requires me to think outside the box, I mean you already know it’s a two-level question cause you solved it, I won’t explain it if you guys want to figure it out.
Why do you only get 135 in Ravens if you can solve this then? I got every question correct.
Is it because it takes you time? That’s what happened to my brother, he ran out of time and got 135.
I didn’t get 135 on Ravens, I’ve never taken the Ravens. I’m stating there’s no way in hell the first question you posted is a 140 question on any test because it’s kind of easy.
I’m just presuming because it was one of the final questions in the test. As to if the order indicates difficulty, I don’t know. Do you ever intend to take Ravens?
It’s tempting to think that if a perfect score on a test equals IQ 140+ (top 0.5%), then the hardest items are 140 level (passed by 0.5%). However because of the imperfect correlation between items, correctly answering every question is usually much more rare than correctly answering the hardest question. This is because even people clever enough to get the hardest items will often be baffled by easier items.
The same is true at the opposite end of the scale. A score of 0 may indicate an IQ below 60, but that doesn’t mean the easiest items are at the IQ 60 level. The easiest item could be at the IQ 75 level (bottom 5%), but failing multiple items at the bottom 5% level puts you at the bottom 0.5% level (IQ 60).
Probably not.
PIQ isn’t my strongsuit.
Although the Raven’s not a very good measure of PIQ. Jensen regarded it as a measure of pure abstract reasoning with very little verbal or spatial component, though he was likely wrong to some degree.
Reasoning entirely regarding the orientation of objects is tor some reason not spatial?
Fenoopy’s techworld insight probably applies here.
MY LORD! THE IQ GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!
Very hard for me, as an guy only around 1 SD above the norm and very young. This was a very humbeling experience. Its impressive that others can solve these kinds of questions easy, it makes me wonder if high iq scores tend to be as reliable for high iq individuals as individuals with lower iq (is the reliability the same for people with different Z scores in g?)?
Dont read the following if you dont want to get spoiled to the awnser/get exposure to invalidate the test
My thought process was probably lack luster, but here it is:
First i noticed that each row horizontally had the same sum of pairs. Three types of pairs exist, the 3 pair (where three symbols are allinged), the (2-1) pair (where two symbols are allinged, and one allone subtracting from the value of the pair, since it will be succinct with my thought proccess, more on that later), and the 1 pair (where no symbols are allinged). The sum for triagles is always 5, and the sum for circles and cross pairs always 7, so the sum for the awnser should make the lowest row have these pair have this sum.
So its either awnser C or G
Later I noticed that there were patterns horizontally, two similar but rotated arrangements of symbols per line. Since G didnt share any pattern with its horizontal row, and not even vertical, while C did, i then deduce that C is the corret awnser.
I did (2-1) as it would make the final triangle pattern equal 1, and make the final rows sum 5.
Awnser: C
Was i correct?
My HEXACO scores:
How come racism isn’t there?
and from these results we can see clearly that RR is lawful-good alignment and wears glasses which he adjusts on the bridge of his nose with his index finger
Not at all.
I think I scored low on creativity because all the questions I answered about a schedule I said I’m rigid and don’t like going off schedule.
You score extremely low flexibility too. High paranoia/cautiousness like me, surprising given you’re presumably super white.
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
What do you think about MBTI? I’m as interested in personality as I am in intelligence as personality matters a great deal in regard to a person’s motives. Personality is also probably largely genetic like temperament is in dog breeds.
I think it’s alright. I know the enneagram method has around a .8 correlation with some measures of personality. I’ll get a cite later.
I’m not flexible because I stick to a schedule. The test assumes because I’m a scheduled man that I’m not creative. They should see me at work.
I can see your low modesty at work. Though I’m worse. Heheheh.
I DEFINITELY see the low flexibility. It’s why Pumpkin banned you.
I admit I’m very stubborn.
i thin kit’s time i put a picture of myself on peepee’s blog.
this is the real me.
God, he hates Jews. Oh God.
Thats not a jew. Thats an orthodox priest.
Of course. I think Cat was saying that Orthodoxers hate Jews.
Didn’t he convert to Catholicism?
you can be an obese college drop out and GET IT.
thank you michael moore.
Moore worships Oprah, so yes, he does GET IT
The only thing Michael Moore gets is shut out in the rain.
Even if I agreed with his politics he’d be a sad, laughable figure to me.
We should have a running bet on when his jowls will finally render him incapable of talking.
moore is the white RC popularization of chomsky.
that spokesman for … sounds kind of gay.
more honest is killing people for a reason.
Oprah had Moore on her show to show the “What a Wonderful World” clip just 48 hours before the Iraq war began. This was praised by the Canadian media as an extraordinary act of intelligence from Oprah:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/an-act-of-extraordinary-intelligence-from-oprah/article1334100/
i feel sorry for unsexy men.
the horrible reality for “high quality” men is that “low quality men” outbreed you.
even in sweden, criminals have more chillens.
big girls don’t cry!
the smart murray, james murray, had 11 children.
i literally don’t understand no matter how many times i watch this or read the comments, far too algerian
In traditional societies, immoral men were cut visiable wounds so that people would discriminate against them, or enslaved them. The fact of degenerates breeding more is worying, i think the jews, mongoloids and upper class whites will find their way though, and africans havent had enough meritocracy to make the non degerate africans breed less thanks to self created better environments (better environments causeing lower fertility rates). This type of thing is a plauge in the arab world, one thing i could agree with Jimmy on, is that the non degenerate arabs should make money and breed with 10 wives to improve their tribe.
i just can’t get enough
i just can’t get enough
i just can’t get enough
i just can’t get enough
the brain is too damaged…
or is it?
it doesn’t matter.
i am the eve-rest that was.
the eve-rest that is…
not me.
i can’t stand peepee’s gay-ness anymore.
THE ULTIMATE COCK!
get aids from ass, hell no.
aesthetics matters, I do not select just any nude female drawings for collection.
for my collection, it sounds so wrong the way I just said it. I hate my mistakes.
The first picture will never not be funny.
gay?
No
Empathetic Genius Silly’s
I Feel More than anyone knows.
so gay, ewe.
I Feel for you [redacted], be yourself (smiley face)
Why do you like anime so much?
It was on TV all the time.
And the stories were deep.
You cared about the characters.
They reinforced my existential question on life.
The saddest things happen.
The most Heroic.
Nostalgic Extacy and Existential Dispair
Hes mentally disturbed.
Mugabe has such an unhealthy relationship with sex (and this blog’s owner) that he thought I was gay. Mentally disturbed indeed.
Plz do Ray Dalio!
He went to shitheel LIU. and then HBS. Worth a look.
I hve no idea why mugabe returns ot this blog if he thinks its such shit but I laugh everytime he writes “peepee” so I hope he keeps coming bakc
because everyone on the internet is retarded, but peepee lets me comment.
Le Pen charged with posting images of terrorist acts. France must be more potty trained than the anglos or germans by the jews. SAD.
Sad how whites let jews beat them around like a housewife like this. Very sad.
Jewish conception of a western conservative:
NO, WE LOVE IMMIGRANTS MORE!!!!
Oh Michael Moore isn’t so bad. I like some of his documentaries. Its just a pity hes on this Russia train now, as hes lying. Or blindly believing in it out of hope. Trump is the natural choice for a person like Michael Moore actually – anti gun, not really religious, kind of left wing secretly on most economic issues, but anti open borders.
for the socially retarded…pssst…moore is a tumpista…but he can’t say that for obvious reasons. he wouldn’t be allowed to make movies anymore and he’s not rich enough not to need outside funding. gibson is.
I would say, i’m generally pro second amendment but with lots of regulations. Its obvious the founders meant for a militia to resist british invasion though. Not factory produced sidearms and glocks or nukes.
I think some of the federalist papers talk a lot about the role of the millitary. I don’t think they were in favour of a standing army, like many nations of the time they had conscription. Hence the need for the 2nd amendment.
Honestly, I think its better that there is no draft or consciption now for the jewish lebensraum wars. Its kind of like darwinism where the low IQ and really poor or mentally disabled sign up for the army.
My dad was a soldier. Hahahahahah.
I guess thats one thing that never changes. The proles and the teeming masses are cannon fodder for the elites.
The founders should have put public financing of elections in the constitution. I think even back in those days they should have foreseen that people would need money to run for office.
Of course, they initially only gave the vote to male landowners so they assumed they would be wealthy enough at least for local office.
One of the biggest contradictions in America is the elitist version of democracy of the founders is not the mass franchise version it has today.
Both versions lead to plutocracy anyway.
One way to avoid plutocracy is revolutions ever so often. Pumpkin asked me – if natural law means aristocracy why are you left wing? Because natural law also means revolutions from time to time.
Peasent and slave revolts are as old as the bible.
See how I found a solution to it Pumpkin. Hahahahaha.
Sometimes one’s intution knows the right answer, even before I deduced it with ‘facts’.
It is an open question whether some peoples intuition is more correct than others. I don’t know the answer to it. All I can say is that aesthetics don’t lie. If you look retarded like Saul Kripke, you probably are retarded in a fundamental sense.
Peasent and slave revolts are as old as the bible.
Which is not very old.
Natural law is EXTREMELY rightwing. The strong, fast & smart animal hogs all the resources & gives them to its kids while the weak, slow & dumb animal starves to death in poverty.
Human intelligence could never have evolved if the big brained primates didn’t monopolize the wealth at the expense of the small brained primates for millions of years.
Mother Nature is a rightwing capitalist.
And one reason capitalism works is it appeals to our greedy primate nature.
Of course we should rise above our animal instincts & construct humane societies with safety nets for those who can’t or won’t compete & have laws preventing capitalism from ruining society.
Social Darwinism?
No competition for resources between lowet classes and upper classes is a part of natural law.
No competition for resources between lowet classes and upper classes is a part of natural law.
How so?
Collective bargaining = social darwinism.
Also, does this mean that within our species (ethnies) mother nature is a left wing socialist/communist?
I think mother nature is a right wing capitalist both between and within species.
But our cognition evolved in part due to our sociality (how do you think we began hunting parties?), and our evolution was pretty ‘socialist’ (hope I’m not just-so-storying). So how could mother nature ‘be’ a right wing capitalist within our species?
Because I assume there was still great inequality for resources within our species evolution. The most successful tribes hogged all the resources and the least successful died out. Within the most successful tribes, the high status people got the best food and huts.
Although many anthropologist will tell you hunter-gather society was equal, I suspect it’s just liberal propaganda. This source rings true:
complex hunter-gatherers had social hierarchies and even inherited leadership. These positions included prestige, social status, and sometimes power. Northwest Coast populations had two social classes: slaves and free people. Free people were divided into chiefs and elite, a lower noble group, and commoners, who were free people with no titles and therefore with no access to leadership positions. Slaves were mostly war captives. Gender was also an important social category. Noble women had often high rank status. Finally, social status was expressed through material and immaterial elements, such as luxury goods, jewels, rich textiles, but also feasts and ceremonies.
Just-so-story.
Evolution is a just-so-story. A just-so-story that makes sense.
The whole basis of natural selection is that some individuals and groups monopolized resources at the expense of others. That’s pretty much what “survival of the fittest” means.
Saying that species change isn’t a just-so story. How are selection explanations not just-so stories?
The term just-so story usually refers to speculation about why certain traits were an advantage. But we don’t have to speculate about wealth being an advantage prehistorically because by definition, rich primates had the most resources, and by definition, resources enhance survival.
How do you know?
Because virtually all animals compete for resources so why would our ancestors have been any different?
What type of conclusions are you drawing of off your assertion?
That capitalism is the law of nature
‘Law’? We are ‘socialist’ to the in-group, evolutionarily speaking. How is that capitalism?
Well that’s part of capitalism too. People often hire members of their in-group at the expense of the out-group
And in the group, socialism, not capitalism, rules. Evolutionarily speaking.
But evolution requires competition: winners & losers. That’s capitalism not socialism.
The winners are more socialist than capitalist since they theoretically had better cooperation than those ‘selfish’ individuals.
Evolution rewards socialism but through a capitalist process, in the same way capitalism itself rewards socialism. Those ethnic groups that help their own get rich while those ethnic groups that act like crabs in a barrel stay poor
“Evolution rewards socialism. But through a capitalist process”
How?
How does capitalism reward socialism?
How do the individualist northern Europeans and the collective ‘others’ fit into this equation?
How does capitalism reward socialism?
The same way competition rewards cooperation.
How do the individualist northern Europeans and the collective ‘others’ fit into this equation?
Well the alt-right would say they’re going extinct because they see themselves as individuals, making them easy prey for races with group cohesion.
Pumpkon thinks bill gates os smart. What tge hell would he know about nature.
Bill Gates could buy and sell Trump and Soros with the change in his back pocket.
Bill gates is a lot closer to rain man than the president.
Lion disagrees with you. He agrees that Trump might be on the autism spectrum (messed up hair, politically incorrect comments, KFC obsession, youngest son rumoured to be on the spectrum).
What does Gates’ “ability” to “buy” Trump and Soros say about what he would know about nature?
“competition for resources between lowet classes and upper classes is a part of natural law.”
Classes are recent, about as old as agriculture.
private property in most of the world is YOUNGER than the bible. the earliest prophets date from the 8th c bc. what was northern europe like at that time?
the economy changes from hunting and gathering to agriculture and/or pastoralism. extant societies in the first category have no property or class structure and are very small, no more than 72 people in an economic unit.
another example of how modern humans are more “conservative” than their nearest relatives. chimps and bonobos are G L O R I A all night long! the female chimps are sluts and the male chimps are himbo-es.
the time since agriculture and/or pastoralism and the present is not sufficient to have made humans into ants. in evolutionary time it’s nothing.
one of the reasons why female humans aren’t sluts is that sex gives them power and power is better than sex.
“The same way competition rewards cooperation.”
And in competing with other groups you’re attempting to better your own group and share whatever spoils or whatnot with your in-group. Which is a form of socialism/communism.
“Well the alt-right would say they’re going extinct because they see themselves as individuals, making them easy prey for races with group cohesion.”
This doesn’t follow because the alt-right is supposed to be ‘collectivist’ while they don’t like the so-called ‘liberalists’ who are more ‘individualistic’ than the alright who are more ‘collective’—supposedly.
And in competing with other groups you’re attempting to better your own group and share whatever spoils or whatnot with your in-group. Which is a form of socialism/communism.
Yes, but the socialism only gives a group a competitive advantage as long as they are capitalist to all outgroup members. A group that was socialist to everyone wouldn’t succeed for very long.
This doesn’t follow because the alt-right is supposed to be ‘collectivist’ while they don’t like the so-called ‘liberalists’ who are more ‘individualistic’ than the alright who are more ‘collective’—supposedly.
Not sure what you’re trying to say here
They are collectivists, they’re complaining that society is too individualist and this is making them into easy prey to collectivists like Jewish supremacists. Ironically it isn’t Jewish supremacists performing the subversive activities, Israel is on Trump’s side and so is Russia.
Israel loves Trump because he’s leaving all his money to Jewish grandkids and because he worships Israel and doesn’t like Muslims. That doesn’t mean Western Jews don’t feel threatened by Trump’s nationalism and political incorrectness.
Neo-Communists are often Jews but they’re actually something else entirely and it’s non-Jewish. Jewish supremacists are Zionists, taking the form of Israel, Mossad and Jewish lobbyist groups inside the USA. Zionists are allied to Trump, Neo-Communists are Trump’s worst enemy. Neo-Cons work for Neo-Communists (Open Society) but are not Neo-Communists.
Shia Muslims hate Zionists and are allied to Russia who hates Zionists given Russia is still very much Neo-Communist beneath the surface and Putin is still very much a KGB agent from the Soviet Union.
http://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_Article2016_ControlFaceDetect/391963
Zionists very much do not like Neo-Communists, as this post by Netanyahu’s son illustrates. Like White supremacists, Jewish supremacists feel under attack by Neo-Communists who are the smartest and most powerful people on the planet.
Thats interesting Fenoopy. I kind of worked out there is a difference between the netanyahu faction and the rothschild one. Its pretty obvious reading the media and now with this corruption scandal netanyahu has.
Im pretty sure Soros is a ‘neo-communist’ as you put it and the neocons are much more closer to the zionists than the neo communists despite a lot of them having previously been communists in the 60s and 70s.
What do the neo-Communists want? An ‘open society’ in white nations but not Israel?/other nations. What is the end goal?
The zionists are much easier to understand, but I’m also sometimes surpried by them. For example, Netanyahu caught on tape supporting the eastern european leaders on borders against the EU.
I find the zionists less evil in a way. The neo-communists present a different vision that is much more fundamental to anything we’ve seen.
Neo-Communists want to end all forms of supremacism/tribalism. Obama is an open Communist.
And who benefits from ending tribalism?
These so called neo-communists do not oppose tribalism, they oppose white tribalism.
PP Fenoopy stated what I was going to state.
I disagree, that’s what White supremacists believe, but they don’t target exclusively Whites. Israel is also a target and so is Netenyahu. Read Churchill’s essay, regarding Athiest ‘self-hating’ Communist Jews and Zionist Jewish supremacist Jews.
Israel is also a target
Not by anyone with power
‘self-hating’ Communist Jews and Zionist Jewish supremacist Jews
Genuinely self-hating Jews are extremely rare.
I do believe Communists genuinely want to destroy all tribalism. The Chinese are also Communist and they are not Jewish.
Destroying tribalism in western countries serves Jewish interests since Jews were historically the victims of white tribalism, being expelled from over 100 countries. So it’s hardly surprising jews in the west would dominate an anti-tribal movement.
Of course these movements take on a life of their own so who knows what it morphed into in china
Philosoper, Bill Gates isn’t a retard. His 10 billion vaccine program is designed for depopulation in the long run.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/163?iss=6206
“However, almost all of the projected population increase by 2100 is confined to sub-Saharan Africa, with almost all other continents and major countries experiencing declining rates of population growth and rising ratios of elders to workers.”
His programs are focused upon stabilizing sub-Saharan Africa’s growth rate, contrary to what you may think.
Marx covers the Jewish question.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/
“What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.…. Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities…. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange…. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.”
Destroying White tribalism is in the interest of Jews, yes, and destroying Jewish tribalism is in the interests of Marxists.
Nobody with any power is trying to destroy Jewish tribalism, Fenoopy. You’re not even allowed to criticize Israel in the U.S, media.
Not yet, but slowly and surely.
no one cares about you pill. no one cares about themselves.
all anyone cares about is me.
Don’t worry, I’ll try harder.
You are the best commenter here. I remember another, previous brilliant commenter [redacted by pp, march 2, 2018] said so themselves.
Someone should preform fellatio on you. Not me, I’m not gay enough (yet).
i thought you were a lesbian gman.
Hi Pumpkinperson
I hope it’s ok that I use this place for a famous-person-IQ-evaluation-request.
Can you please evaluate… Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ IQ?
One of the things that make him interesting is that he seems to have a large, if not very large, head.
Kind Regards Mike
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geert_Wilders
Thanks for the suggestion
Isabelle Adjani easily 10/10.