Back in October the media was gloating that Donald Trump dropped an incredible 92 spots on the Forbes annual ranking of the 400 richest Americans. In 2016 he was the 156th richest American with a net worth of $3.7 billion, but in 2017 he was the 248th richest American with $3.1 billion. New York’s sinking real estate market combined with the fact that his polarizing politics has tarnished his brand with the very elites his buildings and golf courses target, may help explain this setback.
Of course we shouldn’t feel too sorry for the Donald. After all, he’s still the only person in history to get to be both a billionaire and the President.
You now need an astonishing $2 billion just make last place on the Forbes 400. A billion dollars is no longer enough to be super rich in America. When the list was started back in 1982, only $100 million was enough to qualify.
Despite the fact that Jews are only 2% of America, they’re an astonishing 50% of the ten richest Americans in 2017:
I estimate that self-made members of the top 10 average incredibly high IQs (150), while self-made members near the bottom of the list are probably in the low 130s, while those who merely inherited their way on to the list probably average around 115. It’s ironic that old money looks down at new money, when new money is so much smarter.
Despite the fact that blacks are 13% of America, they are only 0.5% of the Forbes 400 (Oprah and private equity mogul Robert Smith, each worth over $3 billion). I don’t think there’s ever been more than two blacks on the Forbes 400 at any given time. Way back in 1986 there was also only two blacks on the list (John Harold Johnson, the Chicago publisher of Ebony magazine worth $185 million, and Motown Records’ Berry Gordy, worth $180 million). Yet another example of how little progress blacks have made in the last several decades, and while some might argue that ethnic wealth gaps can be explained by ethnic IQ gaps, the genetic component of race IQ gaps are too small to fully explain such huge disparities.
Blacks were forced to work without pay in America for hundreds of years and even after slavery ended, they endured another 90 years of Jim Crowe, and in the 1990s their communities were further devastated by mass incarceration, and then were devastated again by mass illegal immigration. And while affirmative action opened up a few doors for blacks, it was nowhere near enough to compensate for centuries of structural inequality, causing many blacks to now call for reparations.
If reparations are given, DNA tests should determine how much black slave blood each American has. Even though Oprah’s a multibillionaire, she should be given more reparations than the average black American, because the average black American is only 75% black slave, while Oprah’s DNA is 89% black slave.
Pumpkin Person 
Funny, if Trump had moved up on the Forbes list, the left would shriek “Exactly, he’s exploiting his Presidency to get event richer!” and now that he’s dropped on the list they can shriek “Haha, he’s a dumb-dumb trust-fund wannabe businessman who can’t manage his business!”
PS your reading on why blacks perform so poorly in the US sounds like retarded SJW screeching; did you have a bad weekend? First of all, black people obviously were not slaves in America for 400 years before slavery was made illegal. And by “structural inequality” I think you mean “an accurate and meritocratic reflection of abilities.” Where else on earth do Blacks enjoy a higher quality of life than in the USA? Nowhere. The US gives them everything they want, and they still jammer for more, even though they’ve done nothing to improve their own lot (crime rates still sky high, etc.). Some black African researchers released a study last week of Somali IQ in Kenya, i.e. of Somalians who had escaped war-torn Somalia to the relative stability of Kenya. The subjects were chosen from the 28% of Somalians in Kenya who go to school — i.e. the best of the best, in the best conditions. And their average IQ was 68 — deeply retarded. So people wonder why Somalians in Minnesota or Canada or Europe do so poorly, and screeds like yours make the problems worse because you seem to be implying that systemic racism is the reason, when in fact the reason is ridiculously obvious. [rest of comment redacted by pp, dec 18, 2017]
I’m not an SJW. I believe there are racial differences in IQ that contribute to wealth gaps, but the wealth gaps are so huge I don’t think IQ alone can explain them, so another obvious explanation is that non-blacks had hundreds of years head start in accumulating generational wealth.
No, the other obvious reason is blacks dont have civilised personality types. This stuff was written about 100 years ago – poor impulse control, no future self conception, lack of co-operation and empathy, prone to violence, schizophrenic more than other races of man.
#keeps blacks poor.
“Some black African researchers released a study last week of Somali IQ in Kenya, i.e. of Somalians who had escaped war-torn Somalia to the relative stability of Kenya.”
Source?
I applaud Pumpkin for sticking to the facts and not being racist.
Pumpkin please do a post on how currency inflation is also causing intelligence inflation.
For example in 1915 a teenage boy could easily start a successful business. but now in 2018 Starting a successful business can take half a life time or more.
Basically as the years go by you need a higher and higher IQ to reach previous levels of success as the generation before.
It wasnt like this during the gold standard. when inflation was nearly non existent for hundreds of years in the usa
Uh, wut??? Currency inflation and intelligence inflation?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4121896-federal-reserve-vs-moores-law
Are you referring to the phenomenon discussed in this interesting article?
Although the article argues technological gains decrease inflation.
yes
it’s not as simple as the japs being mofos in the war and japan being such a successful country.
there’s The Karate Kid.
there’s toshiro mifune.
there’s the hairy ainu.
the jap kids in my public schools were never “different”.
everyone knew they were japanese, but it was like being german.
no one cared.
it helped that they were great athletes.
PP thoughts on this?
“About 19% of the babies selected at random for the Fullerton study later scored 130 or higher on an IQ Test —a widely accepted standard for intellectual giftedness. But, with a few exceptions, the Gottfrieds’ “motivationally gifted” cohort didn’t overlap with the intellectually gifted ones. In other words, these highly motivated kids excelled even when controlling for differences in intelligence or ability.”
https://qz.com/1160024/highly-motivated-kids-have-a-greater-advantage-in-life-than-kids-with-a-high-iq/
I think IQ tests need to measure things like motivation or will as well.
How would IQ tests measure will or motivation? Clearly people with high motivation and normal IQs fared better than people with low motivation and high IQ but I can’t really speak too much about it because I’ve yet to read the paper.
my buddy has hi iq but little motivation and i constantly have to kick him in the ass to focus on our life goals.
You can argue races differ more subtly on various dark triad traits, more than psychopathy alone which is to say. One thing I give jews is that in terms of narcissism, west african blacks are clearly worse and possibly the most profoundly narcissistic group. I was thinking the term narcissism doesn’t fully encapsulate the behaviour being described. A better term would be ‘self centred-ness’ and always seeing the world in terms of oneself and how it should be. You can see it clearly in the comments from black commenters in my opinion.
This is also why black authors are only able to write fiction based on their own lives.
But in terms of machievellianism – definitely jews. I genuinely can’t think of other races that do bad things but are so calculated about it. Maybe southern italians and armenians (who I claim are the same people anyway).
For example pakistanis abduct young white girls out of lust and impulse. But jews really do think about their crimes and plan everything in advance, even to the point of redefining the crime as morality. And actually, based on their own proclamations and edicts to the cult followers, know exactly the moral codes they are breaking. I don’t even think Italians think about morality to this extent, beyond of course the namesake of this behaviour Machievelli. But the difference is that Machiavelli never tried to justify these calculation as being moral, beyond simply saying it was almost natural law.
That other documentary Robert posted about the jewish ponzi scheme person is a good example of what I’m describing. The man is acutely aware of what he’s doing at every step. I actually think what he did wasn’t as bad as it sounds. He was basically robbing Wall Street Jew bankers for the most part. And he seems like a nice family man in some ways.
But if you put him in situations where he would feel the need to get money, I don’t know what the hell he would cook up. That’s the scary thing about people that think in the Machiavellian sense. Everything will be weighted to one’s favour first above all else.
I’m not a narcissist.
I definitely see whites as being more narcissistic than East Asians, although whites (at least NW Euros) may be less on the Dark Triad/Tetrad scale overall.
from your comments you talk a lot about yourself so you are probably a narcissist. but you seem like a good guy thus you would score low on psychopathy, sadism and machiavellianism.
philosopher is a narcissist too. he clearly suffer from megalomania.
or may be he is way too sharp for us.
Trump tax cuts for the plutocrats is such bad economic policy even most conservatives are embarrassed. I get involved a lot over at heartiste and follow some of the more right wing thinkers and I would say these tax cuts are not popular. Its so tawdry. Even the jewish media is attacking it as a handout for the Caymans Islands.
While the omerta on race is crashing down, the parallel development is that the libertarian ‘economics’ view is also losing credibility more generally. I never see many of them around anymore on youtube or quora or even comment sections of ‘conservative’ newspapers.
When I went to college almost everyone in the mainstream thought free markets were miracles and the Ricardo 300 year old model actually worked like that in practice. Trump basically killed the liberal free trade consensus. But I am seeing a much stronger shift away from neoliberalism.
I don’t think the alt right is like the European nationalist right though. There are much more people that are going to believe in abolishing corporate taxes in the American right than European one. And they are fucking retards.
Libertarian freer market democracy is triumphing over the world, including areas of increased tolerance such as in LGBT and deregulation that gave us the web. The Libertarians are polite but IMHO quiet and ruthless and remember working in every country.
Libertarians are also for federal choice of socio-economies as one way of increasing voluntary choice. They’re also anti-far right (or far left).
Their basic ideas are spreading in academic departments.
I agree with your comments on the Trumpenomics. But the Libertarians have made the most conprehensive criticisms from what I’ve read, so identifying it with them is incorrect. They think taxation is immoral and should be made voluntary. They suggest endowments can be used for funding instead. In contrast, the far left and the GOP right are going after endowments in the tax bill in education, for example.Look at what they’re trying to do to Berea College.
are you a national socialist ? i’m more of a national liberal.
Trump has got to be careful. He does the tax thing to win over the ‘establishment’ GOP types. The neocons.
So now he has nothing more to offer them except Obamacare. If Obamacare is repealed, I expect trump will be impeached on a bipartisan basis at some point.
Do you guys believe in aliens?
I would say I believe in them more on the general principle that all the other conspiracy theories have turned out to be true or half true. But specifically, I don’t know for sure.
I heard a more subtle interpretation was that some of the UFOs were people travelling back in time or from another dimension.
Some observations:
1. The UFO phenomenon seems to be almost totally exclusive to average americans and therefore as Steve says in his newest article, could be millitary research planes and that.
2. The videos I’ve seen do look damning but could easily have been faked I suppose.
3. This man, Phil Schneider whose existence I encountered 15 years ago online on Rense, basically claimed to be a deep state insider. He talks a lot about it here:
http://www.metatech.org/wp/aliens/phil-schneider-whistleblower-aliens-government/.
4. It seems to have died down a lot in the past 20 years and this might tie in with Sailer saying the government started them to cover up weapons research.
5. Hollywood glorified UFOs in moves like close encounters and ET. Therefore they are probably government condoned conspiracy theories. That said Oliver Stone basically made a movie about JFK that was correct in its contours about the CIA having removed Kennedy, so maybe Hollywood is given more artistic license than we suspect. Maybe not.
6. America has the most free media in terms of its citizens being allowed to say things outside of official channels…is that why we hear more about UFOs from them? Why don’t Europeans post as much videos though?
What do you think Mikey? I know you are with me on the paedo cult rings.
No, UFO sightings aren’t exclusive to the US. The Spanish-speaking countries and Russia, for example, have a vast UFO sighting literature an UFO discussion. This isn’t reported in the US, though.
oh the paedo cult rings are real. UFO’s are real in the literal sense of the term.(not sure about flying saucers tho)
Jayman seems to think UFO sightings are confined to Scotch-Irish descendents/prole whites in the Far West.
wow… JayMan is a trip!
what does this imply for scotch-irish descendents/prole whites of the far west ?
I don’t believe in the illuminati btw. I think you can make a fairly cohesive argument Bilderberg/CFR is where elites (mostly jews) meet up to talk about what countries to invade or what social engineering to push. I don’t think its a satanic secret society.
I do agree they do see us as cattle however. I’m fairly certain many of them would be classed as psychopathic. They would probably be pretty similar to the Bolshevik Central Committee in personality type actually.
But I agree with Jimmy that the elites do have access to the experimental medical treatments and agree with Mikey that they probably do drink children’s blood which is proven to extend the life pf people.
“do drink children’s blood which is proven to extend the life pf people.”
really ? or is this something that only low iq schizo conspiracy theorist believe ?
In my lifetime, the media has ‘come out’ and stated as fact the following conspiracy theories:
1. 24/7 surveillance or ‘big brother’.
2. Wikileaks emails mentioning the terrorists are funded by the Gulf States.
3. Weather modification e.g. Chinese at olympics.
4. Hollywood casting couch rumours
5. The US government admitted it did give syphilis to blacks to experiment. (this ties in with the government being the source of the 80s aids epidemic in gays).
6. Gulf of Tonkin False Flag
Add more if you can.
so why do you decide to stay in america? im out as soon as i get teh funds and a plan.
1. was common sense
3. Wasn’t a conspiracy theory, China has been known to have been making weather modification tech since the 60s
4.That doesn’t happen and if it does, nobody actually famous has done it and it’s probably a bunch of isolated incidents. Most pornstars are more attractive than hollywood actors, whats the point of a casting couch? So comedians, musicians, directors, Atheltes, all sucked dick before they were allowed to get somewhere in life?
everybody wants to rule the world.
LESBIANS WILL NEVER RULE THE WORLD.
SAD!
The economics of breeding and raising Belgian Blue cattle are inconclusive because of complications experienced during parturition and metabolic demand for increased concentrated feeds. The breed’s increased need to have Caesarean sections when calving means increased cost and added work, and can become a welfare issue.[citation needed] However, the carcass value of double-muscled animals may be enhanced due to increased dressing yield, lean carcass content, and upgrading of some cuts leading to a higher proportion of higher valued cuts.[4] The slower rate of fat deposition causes slaughtering to be delayed in most cases, which means an increase in maintenance costs in those animals. Belgian Blue cattle require more skilled management and do not thrive in harsh environments.[4] For these reasons and others, the breed’s overall production efficiency in an economic sense is still unclear.
[image redacted by pp, dec 20, 2017]
Self-made billionaires should logically have IQ’s tracking their proportion of the population of ~ 1 per million or 170, and thus top out in IQ tests at 160 or show 170 or more in youth tests. From psychologists in the libertarian movement who’ve looked into it, they do (the Libertarians organize the high IQ). 130 is relatively very low, basic genius level as Mensa defines it, your basic academic or high-level professional. These folks tend to underestimate how much more intelligent the wealth are over them. They’re like slow- normals or the retarded to the hyper-high IQ.
I’m not impressed at the large Jewish representation. Most of them did so by manipulating regulations and cronyism, not real wealth creation. I blame the influence of statism and coercive socialism among many Jews. You get a similar phenomenon in Asia with immigrant Chinese who enter countries and game the system.
iq doesnt correlate with social class in my opinion. I view society as a marxist. You got lower, middle, and upper. None of this lower middle, upper middle bullshit.
This makes no sense.
well i g man ill take it one step further and say i dont believe in social class, and that its simply a construct like race
“iq doesnt correlate with social class in my opinion. I view society as a marxist. You got lower, middle, and upper. None of this lower middle, upper middle bullshit.”
There is solid evidence that social class and what ever else comes with it is responsible for all variance in IQ scores.
As we approach the centenary of the first practical intelligence test, there is still little scientific agreement about how human intelligence should be described, whether IQ tests actually measure it, and if they don’t, what they actually do measure. The controversies and debates that result are well known. This paper brings together results and theory rarely considered (at least in conjunction with one another) in the IQ literature. It suggests that all of the population variance in IQ scores can be described in terms of a nexus of sociocognitive-affective factors that differentially prepares individuals for the cognitive, affective and performance demands of the test–in effect that the test is a measure of social class background, and not one of the ability for complex cognition as such. The rest of the paper shows how such factors can explain the correlational evidence usually thought to validate IQ tests, including associations with educational attainments, occupational performance and elementary cognitive tasks, as well as the intercorrelations among tests themselves.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.110.9895&rep=rep1&type=pdf
This is way more complex than the usual ‘SES is the factor’ argument. Richardson also states that the cause of the Flynn Effect is the rise of the middle class, which he discusses in the paper and has great arguments for it.
Thoughts on this PP?
I don’t buy it. If social class was responsible for all the IQ
variance, then adopting kids from low class homes into upper class homes would give them upper class IQs. That doesn’t happen except perhaps in early childhood.
so whats different about early childhood and adult hood?
also i no longer believe in a social class.
i believe that the working class choose to be working class and aspire to be working class. middle choose to be middle and aspire to be middle. etc.
and this is all a construct by our human minds but not based in reality.
like when people see faces in clouds.
“If social class was responsible for all the IQ
variance, then adopting kids from low class homes into upper class homes would give them upper class IQs.”
Social class is much more than occupation and income. It’s more about how sociocognitive preparedness differentially prepares individuals for taking IQ tests.
Adoption from a low class home to high class home raises IQ by 12 to 18 points if I recall correctly. It’s in the Drew Thomas paper.
Social class is much more than occupation and income.
But those are the social class variables commonly measured & we can only study what we can measure.
Adoption from a low class home to high class home raises IQ by 12 to 18 points if I recall correctly. It’s in the Drew Thomas paper.
Did the paper follow up in later adulthood? Probably not. the conventional wisdom among HBDers is that family environment explains almost none of the variance in IQ by later adulthood
Pumpkin is always throwing out information that contradicts his theories. no one here is an idiot. you may or may not be wrong or right, however we can clearly see bias in your argument.
I agree with Phil that Iq is only correlated with income, because the institutions select for it. If the system collapsed. intelligence would be worthless.
However since thats not going to happen. having a hi iq is very beneficial.
on another note
at the end of the day, Pumpkin is part of the elite, and probably the only upper class person we know. He got his money by being born with a huge intellect. However he himself has admitted that there are MANY others like him, that never achieved anywhere close to his success. Most likely because of lack of motivation caused by a shortage of androgens.
In fact i know a man with iq 160 who has had low test is whole life. Didnt like fighting, talked alot, as an old man, his hairline stayed perfectly straight, could never be physicaly fit,is a liar, and a coward, always had weight on him. and now he currently lives in poverty and is a drug addict.
http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2007/07/iq-and-testosterone-in-children.html
this study shows that Extremely intelligent men have significantly lower testosterone.
according to studies his whole life would have been different if he had hopped on the juice.
Male pattern baldness is due to dht, a derivative of testosterone. Each individual hair follicle has different sensitivity to dht. Testosterone isn’t the direct cause of male pattern baldness/balding.
So that article you cited said that high and low IQ people (whatever that is) had similar (high) levels of testosterone with no explanation for why this is the case. Looking into this later.
“Unexpectedly, a commonality was found between the low IQ children and the high IQ children. Both the low IQ and the high IQ children had LOW LEVELS OF TESTOSTERONE. The children with high levels of testosterone fell into the average range of intelligence. These differences were statistically significant.”
for whatever reason iq is negatively correlated with test at the extreme levels.
its possible that any hi iq man that feels unmotivated to be super successful just needs a shot of test.
I agree with Phil that Iq is only correlated with income, because the institutions select for it.
It’s also because smart people make smart career choices & are better at exploiting the environment
If the system collapsed. intelligence would be worthless.
Actually if the system collapsed intelligence might more valuable than ever!
im not buying it. in anarchy and civil unrest. You need more than wits to survive. You need raw unbriddled agression, and the willingness to take what you want from someone at any cost.
im not buying it. in anarchy and civil unrest. You need more than wits to survive
You need more than wits to get ahead in every environment including civilized society. So if the system collapsed wits would not diminish in importance but instead of the hardworking smart conformist ass kissing strivers getting ahead, it would be the smart cutthroat kickass sadistic violent guys getting ahead.
So either environment would reward IQ but the petsonality traits it would also reward would change
Pumpkin. so explain why all genius’s are not bill gates.
what makes some intelligent people successful but not others.
Well Gates was born to a high social class which opened opportunities that other geniuses lacked. He also had an upper class physical appearance which helped and he was very lucky to be in the right place at the right time. He also had the rare combination of being super nerdy yet super aggressive. Those two things are powerful in combination.
organized crime is actually not very organized.
it is better described as a consortium.
only the best are admitted. and only the best of the best who are also italian are made.
…protection for people who can’t go to the cops. That’s it. That’s all. They’re like the police department for wiseguys.
i have read that mafiosos have lower psychopathy than the average person.
my guess is my granddad was an associate of new orleans cosa nostra.
for the small amount of extra money or he may have had no choice.
one of the gangsters told my mother (and my granddad), “such a pretty girl. you’d like her to stay that way.”
but crime didn’t pay much. my granddad had a real job.
he was used for his talent at math.
peepee is so self-contradictory.
she’ll post this but won’t post rob ford.
Rob Ford is a beloved Canadian icon. Trump’s not fit to shine his shoes.
another sign of bias. Not everything Pumpkin says can be trusted.
I would agree with Mikey. I think the first comment I ever posted on this blog mentioned how testosterone is WAAAYY more important for pure survival than IQ. But it depends on what type of intelligence you’re talking about I suppose. That machievellian intelligence the ashkenazi jews have helped them survive as nomads.
why ne asians live longer and outnumber blacks then ?
Well, I think IQ is correlated with income today insofar as it makes you more productive for Master. In the past Master rewarded warriors and thats how you got the feudal system with an eventual landowning aristocracy descended from those warriors. Today master rewards the autistic spectrum. Thats why Bill Gates is rich.
He is not the richest man in the world. The richest men in the world are the people that decide whether Bill Gates should love Africa or Tibet. I can guarantee the richest men in the world do not want to be published in forbes and the forbes family have an agreement with these people not to publish them.
i agree with this 100%. If we could present this fundamental truth to the world in the form of an entertaining youtube video. It would be 1 small victory for the rebellion.
how do you make cartoon vids with computer voices?
Well, I think IQ is correlated with income today insofar as it makes you more productive for Master.
Intelligence is the cognitive ability to adapt whatever situation you’re in to your advantage, so a smart person, whose only goal is money, will figure out who he has to serve to get it, at least until he’s in a position to serve himself.
In the past Master rewarded warriors and thats how you got the feudal system with an eventual landowning aristocracy descended from those warriors. Today master rewards the autistic spectrum. Thats why Bill Gates is rich.
No, a high tech society rewards technological genius and that’s sometimes paired with autism so some freakishly brilliant autistics become billionaires. I’d be very surprised if autism was rewarded in its own right; although social geniuses might be punished by “master” because they can see the game he’s playing, though many social geniuses hide their most dangerous insights & feign naiveté to get ahead.
He is not the richest man in the world. The richest men in the world are the people that decide whether Bill Gates should love Africa or Tibet. I can guarantee the richest men in the world do not want to be published in forbes and the forbes family have an agreement with these people not to publish them.
Actually a lot of the richest people do want to be published in Forbes because one of the main benefits of wealth is status, and you can’t have as much status if people don’t know how rich you are. There have been people who’ve tried unsuccessfully to dissuade Forbes from publishing their names, and one even sued them, but the judge ruled that the rich have enormous power so the public has a right to know who they are.
Even if Forbes agreed not to publish them, some other news source would, unless they’ve all been bought off/blackmailed. But even under your master hypothesis, Gates could still be the richest individual person, but so long as the master class was collectively richer than Gates, they could still potentially control him especially if he’s as autistic as you think (which I doubt). One way to control any billionaire would be to reward him with glowing press when he gives to Africa and punish him with bad publicity when he donates money to whites.
A strong man would take resources. Not obediently serve until they are given out.
so master has a low IQ and the slave have a high IQ ?
make sense when you look the low iq arabs in dubai running their europeans slaves to build their city.
so master high social intelligence low IQ and slave low social intelligence high IQ.
Buffet said it best: If I was born 50 years before with the exact same talents (autism) I would have been a nobody. Something to that effect. Why? Because the USA was a frontier society in the mid 1800s. And this is where Mikey and me can demonstrate that thugs and bandits did quite well in the Wild West in comparison to engineers or lawyers, on average.
The test of the theory is simple. If Master decided people should be socially retarded then over time you will see more and more gullible and naive fools in America. I have not been disappointed.
Master doesn’t select for cherubic naivete of such clownish proportions in Europe. I can tell Americans a mile off just by the childish faces and speech pattern. Master desires retards who can make watches.
maybe this’ll work.
If Master really selected for ‘IQ’ then why is most of the information provided in academia worthless, fraudulent and in some cases causes people to be less intelligent coming out of college?
It is illuminating to consider academia as a conveyor belt taking in raw materials and turning out even rawer materials. Maybe permanently broken materials. If you think about the education system as a whole one gets closer to the vision Master has for his servants. If master truly wanted to select for IQ, he wouldn’t make a coldly efficient system for keeping people ignorant about basic biology, social relations, economics, or history.
There is a kind of canard I must profess even I fall for. And that is that the education system exists to educate people. A marxist might then even rejoineder that it exists to train people to be better workers. How I wish it were that prosaic. In fact the education system in most nations around earth first and foremost exists to brainwash people into a cult. Its number one function is to ‘socialise’ people to serve Master by serving a cult: To speak when called upon. To work to a life mission that someone else will create. To receive ‘moral instruction’ on who is good and who is evil. To ‘take meaning’ from Masters sayings.
The education system in most nations was controlled historically by religious orders for a reason. Most colleges trace their roots to cults or ‘religions’ because their purpose was to prepare cult members to prepare others.
This is the function of organised education for human beings in most cases.
Also the institutions are selecting for femininity. Which is why feminism has dominated american society so fast so quickly. Criminals are out reproducing
non criminals by 33%. the institutions are causing our fathers, sons, and brothers, on average to either be working class and submit to a feminist, PC, hierarchy. Or become career criminals.
http://psychologyofattractivenesspodcast.blogspot.com/2014/07/july-2014-criminals-have-more-kids.html
“Criminals are out reproducing”
selection by master at work 🙂
i’m curious about how a woman transitions to a man.
does she pick out a penis shape and size?
clitorectomy for lesbians is a good thing.
they should also have their ovaries removed.
academics by level of faggotry and lesbianism the least:
1. civil engineering
2. mechanical engineering
3. other “engineerings”
4. computer science
5. chemistry
6. physics
7. biochemistry
8. applied math
….
the greatest:
0. fine art, drama, and music
1. psychology
2. economics
3. english lit.
4. philosophy (in the english speaking world)
etc.
Why is civil #1? I would put mechanical. As it’s harder and more rigorous. But not super theoretical either.
peepee is in love with rob ford.
her lesbianism is cured.
it happens.
yosemite?
no.
it’s bill walton.
way down below the ocean.
where i wanna be.
she may be.