In honor of Halloween eve, I thought I’d show an eerie clip from one of my favorite movies of all time (2001: A Space Odyssey):
What I love about this scene is just the haunting beauty of life before proto-humans evolved higher intelligence. Even though the scene is very violent, there’s just something extremely peaceful about it: For millions of years, generations of African apes would just lived there simple repetitive pointless lives under the quiet glare of the rising and setting sun, and then died, allowing their kids to repeat the same pointless cycle.
The film implies it took an alien intervention for apes to evolves into humans, which as former commenter “Race Realist” has noted, is a common conspiracy theory, perhaps because the human mind is such a complex entity that it’s hard for people to imagine how a process as random as natural selection could have produced it.
Indeed commenter “Mug of Pee” often cites the failure to beat Secretariat’s records as an example of how even artificial selection for relatively simple traits like horse racing speed eventually hits a brick wall where natural selection runs out of mutations to exploit. This may explain not only Stephen Jay Gould’s punctuated equilibrium theory, but the hundreds of thousands of years in the fossil record where the genus homo showed no progress in tool making and it’s also an argument HBD deniers like commenter “Swank” have used to argue all races must have equal intelligence, at least at the high end, because intelligence is so complex that any mutation that would increase its upper limit would take hundreds of thousands of years to appear. This in sharp contrast to scholars like Greg Cochran and Henry Harpending who argued Ashkenazi Jews were selected for high IQ mutations that emerged only about a thousand years ago.
Even though the theme of aliens intervening in human evolution sounds kind of cheesy, it’s handled deftly by director Stanley Kubrick, who never shows us the aliens, instead focusing on the featureless black monolith that mysteriously enhances the IQ of the apes who touch it.
Some claim Kubrick, who was Ashkenazi Jewish, had an IQ of 200, and even assuming the old age ratio IQ scale that gave ridiculously inflated results, this is probably a huge exaggeration. Nonetheless, he may have been the smartest major director of his generation so it’s interesting to note that like “America’s smartest man” Chris Langan, he’s quite interested in a scientific definition of “God”, and that’s what the aliens were meant to be in his film.
another movie in my top 10.
so i’ve named 5.
Dr Strangelove
2001
Apocalypse Now
American Gigolo
Gates of Heaven
maybe it was someone else. Gates of Heaven is a documentary. it’s better than The Thin Blue Line believe it or not. The Thin Blue Line is always ranked among the top 10 documentaries ever.
it’s errol morris’s first and his best. funny. with age comes…not wisdom…sad!
superficially it’s about dead dogs. but only superficially. and a movie about dead dogs would be a good movie by itself.
roger ebert agreed with me. he listed it as one of the 10 best movies ever.
ebert also ranked Gigolo as one of the 10 best of 1980. siskel agreed it was in the running for his 10 best list of that year.
my tastes are very conventional. Gigolo is the one “weird” pick i have. but i stand by it.
i think it’s time for [redacted by pp, oct 30, 2017] to come out of the closet and admit that richard gere knows more about tibetan buddhism than he does.
gere does the full frontal in the movie.
this should allay a few fears.
he plays a male prostitute but he’s just average.
Nice
we think .400 hitting is a thing.
they aren’t as tough as they used to be. like ty cobb.
they are as tough, just not as tough as ty cobb…the ultimate motherfucker/ninja.

i’ve done the same myself. i don’t know what it was. i hadn’t planned it. but i “came down” on some guys just like cobb. it was baseball and basketball for me. i felt guilty afterwards. i hadn’t intended to kill them. but they died. very sad.
you have to reconceptualize the whole issue. .400 hitting is not a thing.
and the mound was lowered in 1968, because the pitchers were “too good”. yaz was the batting champion of both leagues with an average of .301. the national leauge’s champ was .290. now that’s just sad!
so it’s been easier to hit ever since. (this means kershaw may be the best ever.)
here gould talks about selection limits. something which prof shoe has never mentioned. it’s to cockring’s credit that he agrees secretariat is an example of a seclection limit. he said so on n/a’s blog. did he say so anywhere else?
…symphonies…wouldn’t be that much better than the average…
actually von karajan with the berlin philharmonic in studio was able to do something no one else has. the difference is not of degree. wagner sucks, but in the 70s recordings he’s the greatest. one understands why hitler said, “whoever understand wagner understands national socialism.”

listen. see if you agree.
I find it interesting that when Hsu talks about genetic variants for IQ, he often says most/all have negative effects. This is consistent with Swank’s claim that positive IQ mutations are extremely rare. Perhaps when people like Gould deny HBD what they really believe is not that all races have the same IQs, but all races have the same IQ selection limits.
I lean Swank may want to say “novel “IQ mutations” “. The example of artificial breeding in nonhuman animals seems not equivalent with natural experiments or selections if it obey the laws of punctuated equilibrium.
I wonder if most mutations also have their “negative’ side not only “IQ mutations”…
My impression is that you can’t increase IQ usually without tradeoffs in testosterone, social intelligence or neurosis. There are some that can be intelligent without these but they tend to marry lower IQ women as IQ is not a sexually selected trait like testosterone is.
Gould is a proven con man. I don’t know why you would quote anything he says. He came up with the theory to explain away race. Because he is part of the conspiracy.
Gould was a con artist but his punctuated equilibrium theory was cool
he’s a conman.
murray is just retarded and evil.
Tone down the hateration please
another interesting thing, though it may be explained by racism or tradition:
all mlb coaches were players and 80+% of them played in the majors.
this is the opposite of the case in the nba and nfl.
it’s hard to explain this with racism as the nba and the nfl have black coaches who never played played professionally.
so this fact accords with my theory and jensen’s theory that the ability to play baseball at the highest level is more correlated with IQ than other sports.
baseball is a terrible sport and you should feel bad
no. cricket is a terrible sport.
I’ve never seen this movie. Strangelove is very good. Apocalypse now i also think is great as mugabe says..
My favs are more subjective:
American Graffitti
Midnight Cowboy
Elephant Man
Johnny Got a Gun
Spartacus
JFK files released. The important files are Dulles diary.
The truth is democracy has never really existed in human history as presented to the masses. Its always been a managed affair where oligarchic factions bribe or present candidates. The times where it does work is when populists like Jackson, Mussolini, FDR and now, elements of Trumps platform, get elected.
As Robert says, a populist platform always leans national socialist in character or Bernie + Trump.
The opposite of a nationalist platform is one where the politician is making policy on behalf of a foreign power. Not neoliberal eco + jim jones cult social policy per se. Its more correct to see the US economic, foreign and social policies as results of a foreign power than an ‘oligarchy’. Just like its more accurate to call Bolshevik Russia’s policies the type of policies a foreign power would place on subjects rather than a domestic upheaval per se.
This is why I think economics is irrelevant for politics actually.
“The film implies it took an alien intervention for apes to evolves into humans, which as former commenter “Race Realist” has noted, is a common conspiracy theory, perhaps because the human mind is such a complex entity that it’s hard for people to imagine how a process as random as natural selection could have produced it.”
There is a very long 4 hour episode of Ancient Aliens where they go into all of the “problems” with evolution and say aliens did it. It’s a good laugh. I’ll get the name of the episode for you later if you’re interested.
it wasn’t aliens. it was italians.
I wouldn’t mind watching it for a laugh, though I generally hate stuff like that because it’s such an extreme violation of Occam’s razor. If humans needed help from aliens to evolve, how did the aliens evolve? Other aliens? Who helped them evolve? etc.
Oprah helped aliens evolve.
Totally agree. Also if people from the 18 th century would see the world now, they would have believed all the current tech progress was done by aliens too…no way humans could have done it, they would have said. It only means they dont know how tech or even intelligence evolves. It seems complicated to us, but it may have been very simple for nature to create.
by ‘they’ in the later part of my comment i meant humans in general 🙂
It is pretty funny. One thing I remember from the episode was that they said that Sapiens, Neanderthals, Denisovans were separated as an experiment and they weren’t supposed to interbreed.
In my opinion one of the strongest pieces of evidence for early contact and for aliens having something to do with our evolution is the Annunaki, Zachariah Sitchen’s work.
I guess to some Ancient Alien proponents the mind, as you said, is too ‘complex’ to have evolved on its own. It is fun looking at other views, no matter how kooky they are.
Your question is like “If God created us then who created God?” It’s just people who don’t understand mutation, genetics, epigenetics, etc and invent any kind of idea so that they don’t have to understand the intracacies of evolution.
More on this later. Going to watch a bit and tell what they say.
Z,
“Totally agree. Also if people from the 18 th century would see the world now, they would have believed all the current tech progress was done by aliens too…no way humans could have done it, they would have said. It only means they dont know how tech or even intelligence evolves. It seems complicated to us, but it may have been very simple for nature to create.”
But the point of the AA hypothesis is that things were so grand that they thought the gods did it when it was just (supposedly) aliens. So if they saw our society today they’d think the same, when it’d really be more ‘advanced’ people than they were. So it’d still fit the AA hypothesis.
but we ‘know’ that ‘human beings’ created modern civilisation. So why couldnt we have created ancient civilisations that took thousands of years to essentially do the same thing that modern humans did in two fifty years?
”Your question is like “If God created us then who created God?” It’s just people who don’t understand mutation, genetics, epigenetics, etc”
Supposedly you understand…
I bet Z doesn’t believe in god. Not because he’s stupid but because hes autistic.
Autists have a very weird glitch I’ve noticed where they take everything they see as ‘just so’. That everything that is currently, always has been. Their psychological ‘anchoring’ is very deep to the received environs of where they were conditioned.
For example, if autistics were so ‘objective’, why has academia gone backwards and said nothing of worth for 60 years despite the autism levels of professors rising?
The answer that I proposed is that autism is ‘chosen’. The economic professors and others in academia have autism precisely because they will never figure out the correct answer. If you ask a Chinese person how does his government work, there is 0% chance he will be able to tell you. At least the average normy will talk about ‘white male patriarchy’ or ‘bankers buying politicians’ and you get some insight.
Atheism is probably one area where autistics get it right. People of all neuro types reject God at high IQ levels, but autistics don’t need as much IQ to be atheist because theirs minds are naturally less conspiratorial. God is the ultimate conspiracy theory.
Incorrect, the rational answer is actually agnosticism.
If you are correct, why did Einstein, Godel and Langan believe in god.
I don’t know what high IQ schizophrenics think. I doubt you can.
I can only speak for myself when I say that I intuitively see design. But I don’t see human aspirations of ‘beauty’, ‘justice’ or ‘moral’ reasons in the design. It looks like a video game programme to be honest with parameters and rules to avoid people ‘gaming it’ e.g. addiction.
Remember…the athiest position is that there is no reason for existence.
Nor why energy seeks to express itself in more and more efficient (and expressionable) ways. Its kind of ridiculous not to see the momentum of it and what its ‘groping’ at.
‘Evolution’ is a line of programming to ensure entropy. Its not a ‘reason’ unto itself. Dawkins is obtuse.
Philosopher,
I believe in god.
”Atheism is probably one area where autistics get it right. People of all neuro types reject God at high IQ levels, but autistics don’t need as much IQ to be atheist because theirs minds are naturally less conspiratorial. God is the ultimate conspiracy theory.”
How explain non-autistics ”with” lower or avg iq and still atheists**
Yes, and supposedly autistics are extremely rational, but but but
when you visit Wrong Planet you just conclude that they are just like anybody else/namely leftists but with some extra-work to deal in their lives.
You’re correct that God is the ultimate or primordial ”conspiracy theory”.
But you’re not when you say autistic mind is less conspiratory, maybe because they tend to be emotionally dry [some or many of them] we have this impression that they are more rational but ”less expressive emotions” is not exactly the same than ”more rational”.
There are more autistics among academia now than in the past, based on Pill reasoning lines, because ”higher iq” people has had children later in life increasing their mutational load and forging this correlation.
They didn’t believe in god. They believed in pantheism, meaning god is simply ‘nature’ which is the purest form of atheism there is. Denying the existence of higher forces is a religion in itself. But yes, life is just an expression of the natural progress of the universe to negative-entropy, which is what I think you meant.
I still think I’ll die and wake up one day out of a bad dream and take off the VR headset of ‘monkey RPG’ in my real alien life. Never playing that game again.
“but we ‘know’ that ‘human beings’ created modern civilisation. So why couldnt we have created ancient civilisations that took thousands of years to essentially do the same thing that modern humans did in two fifty years?”
Look at structures like Puma Punku and there is why some people believe the AA hypothesis.
Santo,
“‘Supposedly you understand…”
Yes I do. Is there anything in my comment that makes you believe that I do not understand those things?
RR,
But it could more likely be done by human beings themselves. Maybe they had rulers (scales,slides.. IVC had them by 2000 B.C so why couldnt they?), and we know that mayans had knowledge of advanced mathematics so it could have diffused there. Remember people thought pyramids too were built by aliens (some do even now) but earlier the belief was widespread. Until they found out… that they were built from the inside to the outside. So various techniques like these could have been used.
i remember another movie i named, The Hustler.
i’m a cinephobe. i hate movies. but The Hustler is interesting. it’s based on a short story which appeared in Playboy, and even though it’s just shots of a pool hall: The Hustler received nine Academy Award nominations. The film won two, for Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Black-and-White (Harry Horner and Gene Callahan) and Best Cinematography, Black-and-White (Eugen Schüfftan).
it was nominated for best picture in 1961. apparently the number nominated has varied a lot. in 1934 there were 12. in 1961 there were 5. from 1944 to 2008 there were 5.
Kevin McDonald mentioned the exact same people were defending open borders in the 1920s.
Same people. Same arguments. Same agenda.
Great book by the way. I should read the rest of that trilogy. McDonald does write about jewish history in another of the books actually.
yes. it’s obvious now. jews advocate for policies which they know will help jews, even when they also know that these policies will hurt the country as a whole.
this does NOT require a conspiracy. it merely requires that the jew be conscious of his difference from the european majority.
^^Still in denial.
My god. Kevin Spacey apologised for coming onto a 14 year old boy just there. Jesus. Always found it funny how liberals virtue signal the hardest and are the most decrepit sexually.
One of the most salacious weinstein stories was that Italian woman mentioning how Weinstein bragged about the A listers he slept with and when she said she didn’t believe him, he called Nicole Kidman and told her to turn up immediately at the yacht they were in….and she did.
From what I can make out from the various stories, the following actresses have done the casting couch for roles from Weinstein: Renee Zellweger, Uma Thurman, Sienna Miller, Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lawrence, Olivia Wilde.
They are the definite ones. Others I have in mind I’m not sure about.
I actually read a lot of celebrity gossip. Its kind of bizarre but i enjoy reading it more than reading about science and technology articles.
Wow, Corey Feldman went on national tv to talk about the paedophile ring in Hollywood. I’ve been saying for years to my friends, that hollywood has a paedophile (s) ring. Nobody believed me. I would say most people who I tell my conspiracy theories to think Im crazy. They don’t understand im not just a random para schiz idiot talking about fluoride…I can actually reason through these theories.
Shit is going down in Hollywood today!! This is 1 years worth of juicy gossip. Hooray!
One of the best tv episodes of all time. Very abstract.
Twilight Zone must be the Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock of television.
And indeed there will be time
For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,
Rubbing its back upon the window panes; 25
There will be time, there will be time
To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;
There will be time to murder and create,
And time for all the works and days of hands
That lift and drop a question on your plate; 30
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
Before the taking of a toast and tea.
High extra-version : irresponsible, superficial, materialistic
High ”conscious”: responsible [with the government], conformist, deliberated
High … on psychoticism***
“A process as random as natural selection” But, there is nothing random about natural selection, it is highly constrained by the need to produce viable offspring. Natural selection operates on the random products of mutation, gene mixing, etc., and does so in a highly deterministic way. Either the new life measures up to the needs of existence or it dies outl without issue.
The confusion over the roles of chance (which produces the new product) and selection (which is deterministic) is endless. People focus on the randomness in the production of new gene combinations, and they ignore the actual selection.
PS. Selection in humans is still ongoing. Our environment has changed radically which means that selection for the new environment is very strong.
“HBD deniers”
Don’t say it like that.
There’s a big different between that and ‘people that don’t believe in HBD’.
Shitty labels like that are terrible. BHD denier? Might as well have written heretic.
I liked that video clip. I will watch the movie. I hope it’s good.
“Even though the scene is very violent, there’s just something extremely peaceful about it”
I find it terribly unsettling, actually. Life without higher reason is almost like torture. If I had to focus upon my own survival, food, water, etc (for example being homeless) [redacted by pp, Halloween 2017]
I’m an internet child, so I’ve never known what life is like without the internet. I’ve been connected to it since 3 years old, surfing children’s sites, then newgrounds, then youtube and onwards.
Even without the internet, I begin to feel tremendously anxious and aggravated. I feel as if I’ve been spoiled by the abundance of information/ideas and now can’t cope without it. Life without the internet seems almost completely intolerable. Without being permanently hooked up to this ideas network I begin to get withdrawal symptoms and become depressed/anxious.
Just… incredibly slow, dull, repetitive and terribly short and pointless.
I remember life without the internet and life with it. The internet is essentially the equivalent of tv for todays generation. A chance to be a zombie and pretend youre being ‘active’.
Pumpkin can you shed some lite on how the white matter connectom produces the mechanism of intelligence. My understanding is that the attractor state is controlled by central nodes. Control theory verifies this. Memory changes as feedback compel a new approach to any new task. Speed and attractor states maintain causal and effect learning. With things and people. Intelligence arises from a network learning mechanism of push and pull (inhibition and excitation). This could be a useful model for A.I.
When trying shoes the mussels of the hands and body must be coordinated. Somehow the mussels stop and go and shoes get tied. So this must be the mechanism of a learned sequence of the different attractor states as nodes. The white matter connectome mediates the learned sequences and perceptions.
mussels.
Owww.
muscle
(I still hope I was understood)
LOL
I’m trying to remember my favourite writers name….this is scary. I can’t remember the name.
JL Borges! 3 hours later.
Affirmative action = fracking.
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feelguide.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F10%2FFracking.jpg&f=1
“I will be realeasing the JFK files in order to put the conspiracy theory to rest”
Real reason trump released these files even though nobody was requesting it and most people can’t figure out the correct conspiracy theory on JFK:
1. People were getting close to the truth with Talbot’s book.
2. Trump personally likes Kennedy and its a bit nostalgic for him and other irish americans who are the majority of his inner circle.
3. Trump secretly believes the CIA also did it and wants people not to trust the CIA by having the materials out there to dissect.
I think no.3 because if you remember 1 year ago he made a speech at Langley where he referred to the CIA as the 5th cloumn
No you can see why Scott Adams says trumps social IQ is very superior.
In my lifetime, I have never seen anyone with this level of social intelligence without profound psychopathy . Its very skilful to be this socially good without recourse to dark triad manoeuvres.
HAHAHHAHA. Its the way he says it. I am 100% certain he is aware of why the media attacks him when he says things like that.
Greatest political speech of the past 50 years.
If you want a speech that sums up how I see politics, this it that speech.
Robert is kind of right about mental illness, in that its a social construction to say someone is not adaptable to a certain way society functions.
You can make a lot of arguments, and I do, as to why autism is actually a perfect fit for modern society the way Master intends his subjects to be (pliant rubes who serve the Satanic Star).
In my opinion, having thought about it, I believe almost all ‘illnesses’ are types of adaptation to the environment…otherwise they wouldn’t exist that uniformly and in such a widespread manner. There are some mental illness that may be primarily related to physiological deficiencies or physical injuries however.
My particular ‘illness’ is obviously about making me hyper vigilant to threats and is probably much more useful in a slum, Africa or Afros foam parties than a western country. I have not figured out why people would suffer from chronic depression or bipolar or multiple personality. But there must be something the mind is trying to ‘solve’ by going into these states.
It could be what was mentioned earlier, humans mutating randomly and trying to find better states of awareness with trial and error. In my case what I have I am sad to say is not reproductively viable. But it does make me very clear on certain issues and more open to entertaining possible answers.
The reason they are called illnesses however is because they do bring great pain and social problems for the people that have them, even if they are ‘adaptations’. In my opinion, autism is not a mental illness because it does not bring pain, even though its completely maladaptive.
The fact that autism is not classed as a mental illness actually goes against Roberts theory of ‘being sick because you are crap at fitting in’.
all you have to do is comparative psychiatry to see that psychiarty is bullshit.

but none of the societies in this book are hunter gatherer societies, and such societies are the ones humans have evolved for. and such societies have no mental illness.
and it’s not only psychiatry which differs from one society to another. so does physical health. and neither varies for genetic reasons. name a common disease and most of the time there will be a lot of geographic variation in its incidence. this is why the “many genes of small effect” theory is retarded. if no gene has been found for it yet, no gene or combination of genes for it will ever be found, because they don’t exist. they have no environment independent effect.
When life is meaningless, life sucks.
When your life is meaningless, life collapses.
Is not mental illness a voice crying in the wilderness.
This societies no have mental illness or disorder… if you have any source about what you’re talking, still don’t mean this doesn’t exist…
One possible explanation is:
In hunter gatherer societies, there are less people, less chance to have more phenotypical diversification, less chance for mentally disordered or ill people survive and increase their genetic presence; more objective and linear culture; higher selection for general better health [to reproduction].
alcoholism is something HBDers will INSIST is genetic.
the evidence contradicts this.
but that doesn’t mean it isn’t genetic for some people or some groups.
it just means such people are rare or haven’t been studied.
the most credible genetic explanation of alcoholism is…
the genetic alcoholic’s body is so efficient at breaking down ethanol that he must drink much more in order to get drunk.
but then such people CAN drink more without ill-effect.
that is, what would be a very unhealthy level of imbibation for the average person is not for them. but they are labeled alcoholics based on their level of consumption. for example, the pin-tailed tree shrew is not an alcoholic. but it consumes enough per gram body mass daily to cause serious problems for most humans.
this is another example of how a given “psychological trait” is NOT an absolute across cultures and peoples.
but americans are dumb and evil and so they want the whole world to be like them.
Speaking of whether addiction & mental illness genes are absolute across peoples & cultures, we apparently inherited genes that cause nicotine addiction & depression (at least in modern Western humans) from Neanderthals:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/feb/11/neanderthal-dna-may-account-for-nicotine-addiction-and-depression
the word is imbibition [redacted by PP, Nov 1, 2017]
pen-tailed [redacted by PP, Nov 1, 2017]
Pen-tailed treeshrews are the only known mammals that consume alcohol every night, other than humans. According to a study of treeshrews in Malaysia, they spend several hours per night consuming the equivalent of 10 to 12 glasses of wine…
Pen-tailed treeshrews frequently consume large amounts of this nectar while showing no signs of intoxication.
it’s interesting…10-12 glasses of wine per day is very bad for most people. it is not bad for all people. by “bad” i mean that it reduces life expectancy. and i’m not talking about giants like shaq, just ordinary-sized people for whom such a level of consumption does not affect their health…ever.
cirrhosis is preceded by fatty liver which is due to excess calories as much as ethanol per se. there was an italian cross country skier who won a gold medal at age 40. his daily consumption was the same as the shrew’s. but i think he won the gold in a relay.
the irreversible brain damaging effects of alcohol are NOT direct, contrary to the common wisdom. they are mediated by nutrition. alcoholics often eat poorly or not at all, and alcoholism may affect the body’s ability to absorb certain nutrients. the permanent brain damaging effects of alcohol are IDENTICAL to those of beriberi.
if you want an example of mild alcoholic brain damage see jim koch or ray dalio or W.
the irish are in fact heavy drinkers. it’s not a myth.
but what is the HBDers’ explanation?
it is that the irish were among the last european peoples to be exposed to alcohol. that is, they are like the injuns of europe.
a problem with this theory is that the irish were the FIRST europeans to be exposed to distilled spirits. the scottish second. and they were so exposed 1,000 years ago.
maybe this is too little time for selection, or maybe…
the irish drink so much because they have been selected for very efficient metabolism of alcohol.
if this is true one would expect to see that the health consequences of very heavy drinking are no more common among the irish.
and they AREN’T.
“Speaking of whether addiction & mental illness genes are absolute across peoples & cultures, we apparently inherited genes that cause nicotine addiction & depression (at least in modern Western humans) from Neanderthals:”
Genes aren’t causes, genes, defined as DNA sequences, are passive:
It would therefore be more correct to say that genes are not active causes; they are, rather, caused to give their information by and to the system that activates them. The only kind of causation that can be attributed to them is passive, much in the way a computer program reads and uses databases. The selfish gene idea therefore has to be interpreted not only as a metaphor, but as one that struggles to chime with modern biology. That is where the difficulties begin.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060581/
Genes aren’t causes, genes, defined as DNA sequences, are passive
Cause != active cause, as your own source admits
Alcoholism is a histrionic association between satisfaction/gratification and ”to drink”, it’s partially psychological/genetic/instinctive/intrinsic as well it’s need environmental trigger for example, higher levels of anxiety + ”be a non-alpha male” + great alcoholic taste + disadvantageous environment = higher chances to become alcoholic.
“Cause != active cause, as your own source admits”
Correct. Genes are passive, on their own they aren’t cause. To use Dawkins'”(discredited) vehicles/bodies, genes/replicators example, the vehicles existed before the replicators.
Genes on their own do nothing unless directed by the intelligent system.
Alcoholism is a product of
big taste for alcohol ”by the brain/”your brain like alcohol very much”
and
lower capacity to the body to correspond to this desire/lower tolerance.
It’s just like someone who are avid consumist but no have a proper bank account to finance your excessive spending.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Gusinsky
So I’m reading between the lines here. But I decided to browse the wikipedia list of russian oligarchs and noticed this guy. They are all jewish with the exception of Usmanov and one other.
If you read the ‘relationship with Kremlin section’ in this, this exiled oligarch Gusinky, seems to have been exiled for funding an investigation in his media channel of the 1999 ‘chechen apartment bombings’ that killed hundreds if I remember right.
1. In my opinion, the 1999 chechneyn bombing were probably a false flag done by putin and his handlers to secure the first post Yeltsin election, as I’ve read other reports about it from other sources that suggest similar. It also explains why Putin and Bushe bonded over beating up muslims as whipping boys. If you remember, Putin and Bush got on well.
2. It mentions Gusinksy was part of a group of elites known as ‘the family’ in Russia who selected Putin. I would bet money most of them were also jewish and also selected who would get russian state assets, with US jewish elites and Rothschild connivance supervising the ‘free market reforms’.
3. It mentions Putin exiled and harassed him after he decided to go against Putin and that Putin has an agreement with the oligarchs he will be in charge as long as they dont fight him.
4. I bet 99% of non insiders in the west wont realise it, but if you look at the list of exiles they are all jewish. However, if you were to look at the list of people who became oligarchs under putin, you start to see more gentiles. And I think thats the sticking point.
5. This narrative is supported by how the US (((elites))) declared Russia the sworn enemy as far back the Georgian CIA putsch. If Russia was jew friendly in the (((Western))) way, it makes no sense the US would want to agitate or overthrow Putin. 6. However its clear Putin has many jewish oligarch friends he has elevated as well. He may be a non tribal psychopath. Most gentile psychopaths have no tribalism. However he always says positive things about Israel.
Conclusion: When confused, look at the Economist and see what Rothschild thinks….It seems there is definitely enemity with Putin since he exiled this guy and other russian oligarchs for primarily media subversion.
I don’t know what happened and why they turned on putin considering they are part of the conspiracy to put him there initially. I don’t know what the other jewish oligarchs think either. If you read it further you see Kagaolvsky scammed Gusinky out of his Ukraninan media business. He may have done it out of general jewish psychopathy, or under Putin’s orders. Who knows.
The above is something you won’t read in either Western or non Western media in the next 20 years.
It also is more proof that they are intelligent enough to pick up phones and organise scams on large numbers of gentiles contra Robert’s naive thoughts.
Although I call Gould a con man, its important I can also see he is smart. I don’t understand why peoples heads explode when I say a jew can be a wanton liar, but also be insightful and smart. It can happen in the one person.
If you sat down with Bernie Madoff, you would get great personal finance tips I bet.
“Unless they’re busy writing books, most of the evilest millionaires don’t really have the time to dig into the specifics of personal finance. Bernie Madoff has plenty of time these days though, and after being convicted of one of the biggest financial frauds in history, he’s happy to dole out advice to anyone who will listen. Surprisingly, Madoff’s investment advice given to MarketWatch is actually solid:
The best chance for the average investor is to put money in an index fund. There are lower commission rates and more professional management with these types of firms. It’s the safest and least likely place to get scammed.”
https://lifehacker.com/the-best-personal-finance-tips-from-evil-millionaires-1455449295
Yes I recommend the exact same thing.
I think Robert lucked out on banks, because they are as close to an index fund as you get in 1 stock being a very diversified entity.
thanks [redacted by pp, nov 1, 2017], but you’re wrong.
i only bought bank stocks because i thought i understood the business and i see banks as highly leveraged fixed income investments…i maintain a 60% fixed income portfolio always.
i “lucked out” on lots of other things too.
look at the sharpe ratio of variable rate preferred recently. it’s the highest of any asset class.
where i’ve lost money recently is in hedging, especially in puts on SPY.
but this was just hedging…it should lose money most of the time.
and given the vol smile it makes sense to buy atm puts and sell 20% otm puts. no margin required…at least at ib.
I invested into the IPO of a bank recently. My logic was (a) HBD (b) diversified index like entity (c) government put option of bailout (d) I worked for it and know the corporate banking arm financials (e) IPO bounce (f) government supported housing price reflation get rich quick schemes for donors will pad assets.
99/100, I am not going to be a team of specialist Phds, insiders and people whose 24/7 job is to look at the industry non stop on purpose . I strongly recommend nobody do stock picking unless they are insiders (and thats illegal mostly).
not going to beat#
Inflation is subjective. True or False
True.
Every persons price basket reflects their own purchasing behaviours. Hitching your investments to an official ‘basket’ is kind of ridiculous. If you are a rich person, you are not going to beat inflation hiking it to a basket of the average person’s consumables, car fuel, batteries, disposable razors etc.
A good exercise I would suggest, is creating your own basket of goods and monitoring it over time. I’ve never done it. I should.
Offhand, inflation has actually been negative over the years for me, due to China! and myself being creative in getting digitally transmittable items for free.
The other problem is time horizons on expected purchases. I won’t buy a house now…(i’ve inherited it), but a person should factor that in usually for an expected purchase. Same with college fees for kids.
One reason I can live on <£25k per year I suppose is that I can 'cut costs' better than most people. For example, I actually make money on most insurance contracts I enter. I know my own behaviour and (bad) habits.
On relflection I’ve made a profit on every insurance product ive ever had.
https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/07/economist-explains-16
Looks like Mikey Blaze was right. Another reason for harvesting children, is access to young blood and anti ageing effects.
The way autists write about economics is kind of similar to how they analyse whether someone is being sarcastic.
They break down the phenomenon into micro chunks and have yes/no tick box linear arrangements in the various chunks. e.g. lip upturned, yes/no – *80% prob higher.
Lip upturned, flaccid cheeks yes no – does not compute, does not compute.
Silly billy!
So people at my age are richer than people at my age born in the 60s and 70s. Incredible. Counter intuitive.
Not true. Doesnt take into account what people my age have to pay for has quadrupled + debt service costs.
Economist trying to sneak one by with typcial [redacted by pp, nov 1, 2017]
AFAIK, digital tech firms pay shit dividends and don’t actually make money. https://ycharts.com/companies/FB/return_on_equity
Facebook starts to make money in the past year though.
Amazon made losses for 15 years or something straight.
Tech firms are the ultimate proof that Thaler is right and Fama is wrong. What Fama might conjecture instead is that people can rationally invest in a ponzi scheme as long as they get out quick. Which is also kind of retarded as that is no better than gambling blindly on horses.
If you think about it, Fama kind of normalises gambling as rational economic activity by investors by this kind of rigid autistic argument that investors are always right and know what they’re doing. At least the austrians said that gambling happens, and the gamblers will be cleansed by the divine hand of the free market when the Reckoning happens. Or something to that effect.
If you can understand obamacare, it is a bit like someone using a hacksaw to do surgery on someone. Trump seems to be using this populist line that obama enriched the insurance companies. I think thats true, in the sense the government is kind of backstopping the pool of insurees, in the same way Fannie Mac guarantees housing mortgages. But everything else in the bill is a negative for the health industry in general. The one part of the health industry where you could gigantically reduce costs is pharma costs and of course, that was untouched because the politicians were bribed.
”For millions of years, generations of African apes would just lived there simple repetitive pointless live”
SIMPLE REPETITIVE …. POINTLESS**
Sad end to bill o reilly. Probably deserved. Shocking to see how little these mainstream toadies become without high end production values. Sad!
pill should tell be what the volume of otc options is compared to exchange traded options.
so much academic effort has been put into options pricing yet options are a side show.
is this because daily trading of ES with margin adjustments has the same effect?
nominal value of ES open interest is only $410b. the e-mini has all the open interest apparently.
$410b sound like a lot, but it’s not. the s&p’s market cap is $23t.
is portfolio insurance a hard sell or what?
…tell me… [redacted by pp, nov 1, 2017]
You don’t have to correct every fucking typo. It not only makes you look too autistic to realize people know what you meant but it makes you seem insecure about your intelligence & social class. Notice how pill never corrects his typos. More evidence autism & schizophrenia are largely opposite extremes.
notice peepee, you redacted my “correction”.
a mere correction would NEVER be redacted.
yet you characterize my comment as a “correction”.
pathetic!
You’ve corrected your typos HUNDREDS of times.
the only commenter here who has sincerely corrected his typos and for other people is pincher martin.
and he only read your blog because of me.
you’re pathetic peepee.
And yet he dropped you like a bad habit.
yeah. actually the open interest on the other contract is about $41b.
tiny!
when compared to the asset hedged.
the very short term data for pill…in the last year…
i’ve bought 4 euro banks, 2 american banks, and 1 canadian bank.
how have they done relative to their ishares country funds?
the euros: only svenska may have underperformed. intesa has followed EWI.
caixa and dnb outperformed.
CWB outperformed EWC.
my two american choices went up like a rocket after nov 8. i hedged them with puts on KBE.
that was dumb. KBE has gone up and OZRK and SBNY have gone down.
but wait…wait…OZRK and SBNY are the most efficient american banks. it’s not even close. no temptation to sell them.
Why is it sad? I think it’s great that your mom finally found true love.
Homophobics tend to mentally ill …
it’s sad!
me 61cm head size, 6″3 >145iq
mother 58cm (bigger than mans head size) 5″8, 134iq. she is very naive and stupid though. believes in god etc. this result shocked me. just good at ravens iq tests i guess. A+ student in her youth
father 60cm 6″2 idk his iq, he is a senior consultant for nokia. incredibly anti-social and neurotic. he’s such a jew, idk how to explain it. just a penny pinching jew
sister 57cm (mans head size) 5″5 132iq she is also naive and stupid but scored high for some reason, i don’t know why
smarter sister 58cm (bigger than mans head size) 5″6 138iq clever. scored high as expected, just didn’t expect my other sister/mother to score as high as they did.
idk my brothers, he wont let me measure 6″0 134iq. i thought he’d be smarter than my sister but apparently not.
i tested my cousin. i don’t know his height. about 5″10 or so? he’s 16. he got 128. kabyle jew 100%
genes:
Moms side:
grandmother: 1/2 sri lankan, 1/2 chinese
granddad: english
mom: 1/2 english, 1/4 sri lankan, 1/4 chinese
Dads side:
granddad: kabyle jew
grandmother: kabyle jew
dad: kabyle jew
me: 1/4 english, 1/8 sri lankan, 1/8 chinese, 1/2 kabyle jew
iq is just from iqtest.dk, none of them have done official tests
and yes, i went around with a tape measure randomly measuring my family’s heads.
i can’t really tell the difference between 145 iq and 138. i am a bit sharper than my sister, i can solve some puzzles she can’t. she is without a doubt very very clever however. putin is probably >145 iq, no dogma, very smart. >145 is almost 100% assured to be sociopathic/purely rational and deliberate without retard to ethics or emotions. i am 1/3 putin’s age so he is probably smarter than i am in brain hardware (maybe?) certainly more knowledgeable
difference between 145 and 130 is huge, 130s always have stupid dogma, always intentionally deluding themselves, miss easy puzzles, 130s are wannabe scientists. people from pre-internet generations are often especially deluded. i presume a surgeon that believes in creationism is 125-130iq like that black guy who ran for president i forgot his name. carson something
120, average non-retard who reads a few books, always greatly deluded, but ‘smart’ in the traditional sense
< 120, idiot
“120, average non-retard who reads a few books, always greatly deluded, but ‘smart’ in the traditional sense”
Pumpkin does not believe me that I have met a person IQ 170 in real life. He said I was 118 IQ. Sitting at my table he said he could not figure out what I was thinking. When I am in that sate I have shut down all conscious processes and let the unconscious take over. All internal commentary stops. Mental manipulation takes place in the background but with crystalized knowledge. Fluid intelligence usually is conscious awareness of items and what to do with them. What I do is wait for the answer to come on its own, not from my mental effort.
The way genius works is enormous amounts mental manipulation. But is mostly unconscious itself as information crystalized can match paters fast. The fluid intelligence is uninhibited by emotional blockages. Together it is a detached observation of the persons own subject, no effort but simple witnessing of your actions.
I have tried to force myself to think when I had no insights at the time. This meant that I got anxiety being still too often. The commentary part of my brain told me I must produce some kind of idea or concept. The anxiety I have had began at 12. There is a stage of development that begins at 2 and advances at age 5. Intuition. That is when thought has no commentary, you just know something. Recently I have been using my intuition to alleviate my anxiety and the sensations it has caused in my body. I am paying attention without forcing myself to need control.
Since I believe intelligence is a control system, if I can get the noded to rearrange the attractor states by changing their influence on the system then this means I can make the system faster. I can clam down the right amygdala and so make other nodes stronger. I free up space to process other things. Ultra high IQ people can sort and combine patterns because of the network directing information flow. They allow everything to happen in the order of the nodes influence in the network.
I am sure that I can make my mind work faster if I change the attractor landscape my brain currently has.
I believe that IQ can be understood by understanding how plasticity changes the brains attractor landscape. This has a basis in control theory for tying shoes and abstract thoughts.
i actually think 100% with intuition and never make deliberate thoughts, so we are the same in that regard
also suck at math, don’t like actively manipulating things in my head
Fenoocuk = Full-time tard…
Jeeez…
Pumpkin should do more posts on geniuses and why they are so fascinating to the general public.
Nightcore – Genius
that anime chick has a huge tits and booty
A genius can look like anyone.
Brilliant book. Brilliant movie