I’m not a member of the far-left or the alt-right but I’ve noticed both groups sometimes are guilty of the same kind of racism, namely, the tendency to assume almost all successful blacks are just being used by the elite, and not just like any other smart person who exploited opportunities to get ahead. That’s not to naively deny that elites select people who are willing to carry their water, but why do black elites so disproportionately get accused of “selling out” or being puppets, when they’re no different from any other successful person?
So the far left will accuse Obama of just being the black public face of power to disguise the fact that the real agenda is to keep blacks disenfranchised.
On the other hand the alt-right will say Jews deliberately empower blacks like Obama as a way of disenfranchising the white power structure which has historically challenged their power.
So the far left sees Obama as a tool to keep blacks down while the alt-right see him as a tool to keep whites down, but both just see him as a tool for the elites.
Ironically, the only political extremists who give Obama any credit or agency are the far-right which saw him as a Manchurian President brilliantly advancing a secret pro-Muslim agenda.
Alt-right commenter “Philosopher” claims he used to be a liberal and I believe him. Strong feelings are easily flipped and you can see the parallels between the far left and the alt-right; indeed the alt-right could be renamed the alt-left. I think some of the biggest racists are actually white liberals, but they feel guilty about it and overcompensate by adopting a far left ideology.
But it’s easy to love poor black people. They’re not a threat to your power or economic status and they allow you to feel superior. The real proof that you’re not a racist is “can you love and respect empowered blacks?”
Pumpkin Person 
the “far-right” is NOT far-right peepee.
you can’t think if your thoughts are framed in the terms provided you by denmark.
sad!
It’s all relative to the time and place
no. that’s exactly what it’s not peepee.
“far” is a pejorative. the purpose behind the label “far right” used by (((mass media))) is to plant the idea in the heads of the people that the “far right” is crazy.
the terms left and right originated in revolutionary france. one faction sat to the right of the speaker at the rostrum the other to his left. the two factions were aristocrats and commoners. the old rich and powerful and the new rich and powerful, the bourgeoisie.
it is used by extension and modification but its use as a description of national socialism, the national front, or the american alt-right is 100% illegitimate and politically motivated.
unlike the dictatorships of latin america which sought to maintain the power of the landed elite, hitler’s revolution was not conservative.
what is called the “far right” is almost always combines the following:
1. economically progressive/liberal/socialist
2. socially conservative
3. impervious borders, restriction or moratorium on immigration, expulsion of alien peoples, first in line being danish people.
in fact Joseph Goebbels, had stressed the socialist character of Nazism, and claimed in his diary in the 1920s that if he were to pick between Bolshevism and capitalism, he said “in final analysis”, “it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism”.
why this perfectly legitimate political position is not allowed by (((mass media))) is obvious to all non-autists.
in one word the point of it is “particularism”. its enemy is univeralism. universalism is like the P = G + E of politics. it’s a LIE! but it serves the interests of the rich and powerful so it is promoted and the truth is suppressed.
I make a confusing distinction between the alt-right and the “far right”; the distinction being that the latter are “conservative” on everything while the former can be quite “left” on foreign policy, economics, and religion.
funny that mugabe, pill, and misdreavus have exactly the same politics.
isn’t it?
misdreavus is even anti-gay agenda even though he claims to be gay himself.
Mugabes reply above is the best comment hes ever made on politics. It took me a while, but i now see thay all my life i have been a national socialist . I just was never allowed to know what the nazis actually believed.
Its opposite os neoconservativism.
Le na dunham social policy
Milton autism eco
Robert rubin foreign policy ie. Israeli world domination.
The altright is a large tent of ideologies with the intent of saving the white race. The far right are authoritarian ideologies such as national socialism. The far right is conservative I guess you can say. But it’s nothing like American conservatism. Think National Socialism.
no. totalitarianism is neither left nor right. this was the problem with the nazis. they were anti-democracy. at the same time hitler’s economic policies were successful before the war. according to chomsky this is why he was genuinely the most popular german politician ever. it wasn’t just goebbels lying to people.
and the nazis won the most votes in 1932 and 1933. not a majority, just a plurality. but the nazis were not a junta. they came to power democratically then ended democracy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_July_1932#Results
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933
what am i saying? i’m saying hitler would have won re-election by a landslide if there had been another election.
interestingly, the reichstag fire was likely not a nazi job. it was like 9-11. it was convenient. whereas the russian apartment bombings were the work of putin. oliver stone and steve shoe are paranoid. putin is, in the words of robert gates, “a stone cold killer”. and unlike stalin he’s corrupt. he makes the clintons look like pick pockets. but at least he’s cleared out the danish influence from russia. of course shoe is right that this russian interference is a joke, but he’s wrong that dem politicians and mass media don’t know this. the point of the russia stuff is politics. the dems and their backers want to obstruct trump just like the gop obstructed obama.
also interesting is that the assassination of kirov was likely not on the orders of stalin. stalin just used it as pretext to begin the purges.
but at least he’s cleared out the danish influence from russia
Do you think that’s partly why the media keeps pushing the trump is putin’s bitch narrative? Because they fear a Trump-putin alliance?
Putin also has good relations with Iran which neocons must hate
if mass media believes that trump is anti-danish then yes, but he may not be anti-danish, just like stalin wasn’t anti-danish. it’s just that 90% of the oligarchs prior to putin were danish, and putin’s friends are not danish. in fact i have never heard it suggested that putin is anti-danish. he’s still friends with abramovich, because abramovich has never challenged him.
russia really is a neo-feudal society. the economy is controlled nearly 100% by friends of putin’s, people putin has picked to run russia’s big businesses.
that is, putin is the monarch and his friends are his vassals/barons.
the difference is that putin will not be succeeded by one of his children.
genuine democarcy always leads to a politics similar to that of national socialism in a state which is still fairly homogeneous.
immigration has always been opposed by natives. has always happened anyway, because it keeps wages down.
the grossly disproportionate power of a small minority ethnic group has always been opposed by the people. it persists only due to lack of democracy. the protection of minority rights against the majority isn’t a problem if there are no minorities.
according to the official LIE, japan has a far right government and always has.
^^^^ Mugabe shares my opinion exactly on this matter.
I have always maintained if you polled the public, the populist positio s would align with me and roberts virws.
This is why steve schwarzmann is so bothered by populism in all joa talks and lectures. He is the small foreign occupier elite.
On the other hand the alt-right will say Jews deliberately empower blacks like Obama as a way of disenfranchising the white power structure which has historically challenged their power.
except this happens to be true. running for president and giving the dnc key note weren’t obama’s ideas.
robert rubin is danish peepee.
as long as peepee hates the truth she will never find it as hard as she may search for it.
peepee is black.
sad!
Obama is nonconfrontational, passive and his IQ is 135 in my opinion. As a black, he is an outlier. (If John Mccain was elected we may have gone to war with Iran) Trump is confrontational, assertive and has an IQ of perhaps 145. Obama was there to make people feel good, Trump was elected because people wanted him to take action. Hillary is a fake person. I do not see how Obama could help black people because everyone was affected by the recession in 2008 and the bailouts. So many conservative jobs were lost the tea party got big. Today black lives matter is happening and it is because social media records all blacks killed by cops that was impossible before social media. I remember that some people were surprised that in the new Sar Wars movie that people were upset the main storm troop was black. Before that lots of people were upset Disney would ruin Star Wars. Many Christians got upset when Obama put the rainbow on the Whitehouse.
I think the best way to help black people is to grow the economy. The black people I have met I do not find their personality dislikeable but I have seen on TV blacks that I really do dislike. The average black IQ in America is, let’s say 90 because it’s been going up. Since Obama is 135 that is a super genius as a black. Obama probably has a hard time relating to modern popular black culture. But he was exposed to academia influenced by 60’s black culture. Culture is different now that we have the internet. Google Rucka Rucka ali’s songs. (He’s Japanese and makes many racist comedy videos) He is into gangster culture.
Since I got out of the hospital and Have been taking lithium and Klonopin I feel much better. I am still waiting on pumpkins assessment of my SAT scores and my IQ. I took a personality test that says I am.
Openness 10%
Conscientiousness 79%
Extraversion 21%
Agreeableness 38%
Neurotisism 46%
conscientiousness is correlated with academic success.
Openness with creativity.
Personality is a separate construct from IQ,
I have written about how intelligence and creativity relate to each other.
https://illuminaticatblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/13/intelligence/
From this, I better understand pumpkins mental capacity and why his blog is so much better than mine. (This is also why I think Trump is 145, he is a billionaire like Oprah)
still not working.
obama was both a tool of wall street and of denmark.
this is a contradiction only in the minds of people with IQs < 40
and is known to all those with IQs greater than 100.
obama was both a tool of wall street and of denmark.
wall street yes, Denmark not as much as other presidents because:
1) Iran Nuclear Deal
2) blacks can never be total tools of Denmark when their interests overlap so much
this is a contradiction only in the minds of people with IQs < 40
Which is why no one implied it was. The mutually exclusive claims are the alt-right view that Obama is being used to oppress whites and the (black) far left view that Obama is being used to advance white interests.
obama was stupid.
so stupid that his patriotism was sincere.
he was an affirmative action president.
this happens only in danish dominated societies.
Sadat in Egypt?
huh?
Afrocentric lunacy otherwise known as ” we wuz kangz “
sadat wasn’t much blacker than nasser.
Anwar Sadat was born on 25 December 1918 in Mit Abu El Kom, Monufia, Egypt to a poor Nubian family, one of 13 brothers and sisters.[6] One of his brothers, Atef Sadat, later became a pilot and was killed in action during the October War of 1973.[7] His father, Anwar Mohammed El Sadat was an Upper Egyptian, and his mother, Sit Al-Berain, was a Sudanese from her father.[8][9] Thus, they said his mother did not look “Egyptian enough” and some called him “Nasser’s black poodle.”[10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Sadat#Early_life_and_revolutionary_activities
Dey wuz kangz.
no one would confuse sadat for an african american or west african. in the old days ethiopians were classified as caucasoid.
yes sadat was darker, but his facial skeleton and hair were just like nasser’s.
what a clown
next he will call indians black
there is nothing more hilarious than a black supremacist
in particular obama was socially stupid and gay.
this explains why he married a male gorilla.
I’m sentimental, if you know what I mean
I love the country but I can’t stand the scene.
And I’m neither left or right
I’m just staying home tonight,
Getting lost in that hopeless little screen.
(Leonard Cohen)
Still banging on about this legacy of colonialism crap. Unfuckingbelievable.
Wattthittttmm. BOO!
GlOBOHOMO YAY!
We all wonder who is able to love and respect an empowered black empress here around and get the well deserved certificate of proof of being the Rosa Parks of HBDsphere 🙂
allow you to feel superior.
No, they don’t allow you to feel superior and I don’t either.
I think some of the biggest racists are actually white liberals, but they feel guilty about it and overcompensate by adopting a far left ideology.
Elaborate… or can’t you just imagine that there exist people who don’t see the world in terms of black and white, and that the enemy of the white poor is not the black poor but the white capitalist and the black capitalist. One day you’ll understand race is just noise in the whole process of social relations.
“and that the enemy of the white poor is not the black poor but the white capitalist and the black capitalist.”
I remember hearing of, though second hand, of Irish and Black revolts in Caribbean like Barbados.
Elaborate… or can’t you just imagine that there exist people who don’t see the world in terms of black and white, and that the enemy of the white poor is not the black poor but the white capitalist and the black capitalist.
But in the eyes of a lot of liberals, there’s a special place in hell for powerful blacks who don’t do enough to advance leftist agendas. Part of that might just be disappointment because they expect more liberalism from blacks, but in many cases it also could be a sense of entitlement (powerful blacks OWE us) or some racists might become liberal as a form of denial.
A lot of liberals still laud South Africa’s ANC government as though they’re the spiritual sons of Madiba although they have established a kleptocracy that does very little for the poor black mass.
Speaking of Obama, getting mad at him is retarded because because he never presented himself as a president for the Blacks nor as a Marxist. He betrayed nobody and Congress Republicans did a lot to slow most of his efforts.
So racism, conspiracy and whatever extremist bullshit have one common denominator: stupidity.
if this were so obvious afro your country wouldn’t have to make it a crime to think otherwise.
i think france is actually governed by lord bucket head.
sad!
PP, to you, as international guru of statistics
bowing to your lotus feet
Given
One person has taken 3 experimental high range iq tests,
test A iq 135
test B iq 141
test C iq 149
correlation between the tests unknown
But
A correlates with FSIQ WAIS 0.88
B – WAIS , r=0.932
C– WAIS r=0.712
Question’
What is the person’s ‘theoretical ‘ WAIS iq?
Without knowing the test intercorrelations you can’t know.
Thank you
So you have taken some of these tests: https://hriqtests.com/stats/
In the list there are 2 tests by Prousalis and one by some other guy.. Cool nickname btw)
“The real proof that you’re not a racist is “can you love and respect empowered blacks?””
WNs and other real racists could never accept the idea. If it wasn’t for the “fact” that Eurasians have bigger brains and higher IQs, they would cry themselves to sleep
usually when you see the grassroots left and right agreeing you can be pretty sure its the right position. There are big exceptions but…..
Blacks and other minorities are being used to disenfranchise whites
blacks have always been used against other blacks
i do no for a second believe that the establishment cares about blacks. They simply see them as just one of the many non-whites groups that serve them.
i do no for a second believe that the establishment cares about blacks.
The establishment’s motives are irrelevant. What matters from the black perspective is whether the behavior of elites is empowering or oppressing them.
The motive is evil. The result will eventually be evil. Evil finds evil.
the people afro should admire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33rd_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_Charlemagne_(1st_French)
There’s a difference between publicly proclaiming your love of poor black people and consistently taking actions in support of it. Stated differently, many white liberals will virtue signal endlessly because it quite frankly doesn’t cost them anything to publicly express support for poor blacks. Here I’m specifically thinking of Hollywood liberals like Ben Affleck, who does charity work for impoverished Africans but would never actually choose to live in an economically oppressed, predominantly black neighborhood.
And I’m not saying that he should have to in order to avoid being called a hypocrite or closeted bigot; I don’t want to live there either. I just can’t help but note the disconnect: “Your suffering is my suffering! I’ll do anything I can to advance your cause! Well, anything other than actually live among your or even send my kids to the same school system as yours.”
By the way, PP, when you say
How are you defining racism in this context?
How are you defining racism in this context?
Dislike for blacks.
Whatever jews say as i have no verbal o telligence. Mammy gove me a hug mean people everywhere. I just wabt to serve the jew agenda in peace! MMMMAAAAMMMMMYYY!!!
LOL!
The real test if you are racist or not is if you sleep with a black person (preferably oprah or michelle obama). That proves you are not racist and is exactly what the jews tell is all is the best way to go.
100% agree with the jews on everything. Lets jump into a shark tank.
i have noticed that a lot of white trash in both the US and UK feel that sleeping with a black man gives them a license to be racist.
I recently saw a chav woman launch a raging tirade using all sorts of racial slurs and when the people called her racist she said ” the father of my children is black” and then brought out her mixed race child.
how many black men have you slept with jimmy?
i haven’t slept with any i know of, but afro may have done me while i was sleeping.
The real co frontatio this centtury will be populist/national socialist vs neoconservativr jew. As it was in the 20th arguably.
Henry ford was a national socialist.
I would disagree with the notion obama was a tool. My sense is that he was far better than mccain and the jews tried to prempt him by backing an already winninh horse. Notice how romney was the consummate candidate of choice.
I suspect obama was led by his jewish advisors moreso. Finance is a complicated area. I consult in it. He couldnt to cover it with everything else.
Although im admittedly stil confused on money creation. If you use the print from mothing model, the reserve requirements should be higher. Othwrwsie there is trillions in leakages to offshore.
Many have suspected the print from nothing model is the case. But then why would the re by cbs elsewhere? Unless the plutocracies of other nations were using it as a similar counterfeit operation.
central banks “print from nothing” pill. that is, after the gold standard was abandoned.
commercial banks create M1.
they don’t and can’t create MB.
for two supposed finance veterans you and jimmy understand little about money. which isn’t to say i have all the answers.
the big conundrum for me is how the texbook M1/MB ratio was true…until 2008…after which it’s not only been false but absurdly false.
when the central bank takes MB off the banks, it could destroy it.
when it buys government bonds and remits all interest back to the governments…it could just cancel the bonds.
but this is just accounting. the reality is that monetization of debt does not cause inflation.
for more see Between Debt and the Devil.
or japan for the last 40 years. the ultimate confound of autists.
1. japan’s government debt to gdp ratio is the highest in the world.
2. japan’s government debt has near 0% yield.
3. japan’s inflation rate is zero and has been zero.
Interesting conversations on finance. I was an economics major but I’ve learned more about markets in the few conversations here than I did in school.
It’s not that difficult to explain. When the United States raises our (self-imposed) debt ceiling, confidence soars that we averted a crisis. People buy the dollar (hence, inflation doesn’t occur).
The *ability* to take on debt increases confidence and the value of a currency.
It’s sort of silly considering it is *our own Central Banks* buying the bonds in the first place, but markets are irrational, as you preach all the time, Mugabe.
Data shows I am partially correct. That theory should’ve been conditional.
In 3 of the 5 24 hour trading period following a debt ceiling raise from 2008-2012, the U.S dollar rose in value compared to the Euro.
However, from 2012 to the present, that was only the case for 2 of 6 times. Debt is more acceptable and the ability to take it seen more as a positive the closer one was to a financial meltdown.
From http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EUR
Dates of debt ceiling raises: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States_debt_ceiling
2013, not 2012.
EVERYBODY SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
IT’S MY BIRTHDAY, FAGGOTS.
Happy Birthday! Gemini for life!
Yea Geminis rock and we make our pecs bounce, go us!!!!
Will you defile your girl further tonight?
Yea Geminis rock and we make our pecs bounce, go us!!!!
LMAO!
Will you defile your girl further tonight?
Well, I didn’t make love to her eyes, if you know what I mean.
The times of London reads like one of those Mensa things I was at last year. A bunch of silly smart idiots scofing at populism and relying on word games to prove superiority.
And a complete lack of knowledge about Rushtonian behaviorial genetics.
“Yes, I must very well declare Magic Negro is our king! Shylock Silverstein is our God! Oh pity ye peasents who cannot see the true beauty of the psychopathic races of man, for their justness and honesty gleams like the azure of the Mediterranean water of my holiday home. Alas! We are not meant for this world (goyim). We must, nay, need to send more men to fight for Zion in the deserts of Arabia and Persia. This will finally give us the respect we need in the world from the global media [Circular error, process request DENIED]”.
There’s a gigantic dickhead gamma male I work with who reminds me a lot of the Times journaliers. Wrong on economics. Wrong on open borders for the jews. And certainly wrong on neverending war for Greater Israel. Uses semantics like shaving foam.
Biggest gamma I ever met. Can’t admit when he’s wrong. Deceitful. Hubristic. Retarded and feminine. Just a fucking pain in the arse in an office environment where I’m trying my best not to hit him. Sly, cunning and definitely bisexual.
Looks like a toff as well. No wonder the gentile aristocracy crumbled under the jew predators with sons like this FUCKING RETARD shimmying around like Marie Atoinette.
I Declare!
In the end what does your semantic ‘morality’ make you do goyim?
– Open da bowdahs
– Provide money for the sand people
– Open season on your women
– Drain your pension funds
– Make your poorer
– Make the world more dangerous
– Make you a prisoner in your own country
– Make you watch what you say so that it doesn’t offend some brainwashed silly smart Times/The Economist reader.
Thats right!
You joined a Jim Jones Cult!
The rejection of national socialism is to de facto become a member of a Jim Jones cult. Except if you’re black. But my suspicion is that Zion will have no problems drpping its mask on blacks, like in Israel, when the time comes because, they are goyim too!
YEEEEEEHHAAAAAAA.
The real test of racism is not willing or not to sleep with other races (neither necessary nor sufficient condition) but of disapproving different races having baby. If you think, I would never have a relationship with a black women, for the sake of the children, who wouldn’t be black nor white, you’ve got very good chances of being a true racist person, which, according to me, doesn’t necessarily mean mean nor evil, just palin racist.
just a plain racist.
Thanks bruno. The more we crack down on race-ism the better the world will be for jews. Thats all i think about. Making the world easier for the jews to destroy and debauch.
Bruno, do you feel comfortable watching the French national team and seeing a team that looks like the Congo ?
I was watching the England-France game and i was utterly shocked.
The French team is now a top team but what we saw goes against the spirit of international competition
Its meant to be the best of one nation vs the best of another nation.
what we saw yesterday was a disgrace.
and also remember that according to afro the reason why the french national team is 100% congolese is…
1. black people are genetically superior footballers.
not because…
2. france’s blacks have no opportunities and france’s whites have better things to do than practice at football.
1. black people are genetically superior footballers.
That’s not my language, I only say things like “this [insert gene name(s)] genotype is associated with this phenotype and is more common in this population”.
2. france’s blacks have no opportunities and france’s whites have better things to do than practice at football.
Black kids tend to spend their free time playing soccer while white kids tend to spend theirs playing World of Warcraft or jacking off to blacked.com. Who makes the best decision? It’s not ours to judge.
Speaking of alt-left and far-right, you should do an Alex Jones analysis like the Cynthia McKinney one. I know Alex Jones claims 140 but that seems too high . Plus Alex Jones is in the news right now.
The rumour is jones is compromised by his yiddish wife. I listened to this paul joseph watson the alt right seems to admire..
.essentially he argued against muslim refugees because theyre werent pro jew and pro homosexual sex.
Right.
The rumours……may have truth. Maybe one of jimmys ‘controlled opposition’.
The biggest disappointment for me was finding out that Alex Jones might really be Bill Hicks. a lot of people think that Alex lied about his date of birth. he does look older than 43. he claims he was born February 11th, but he doesn’t act like a typical Aquarrius. he has so many Sagittarius traits, which Bill Hicks was a Sagittarius.
Yea, that really pissed me off when I found out Alex Jones may be Bill Hicks🙄
What did Jones do?
He did a interview with Megyn Kelly.
Bbc ((((alan yentob)))) is showing us how multikultifuckiuppy is great. As winston said in 1984 upon seeing big brothers face encouraging us to fight for the Party:
The bolsheviks were all jews. Notable exception of stalin aside….
Who kept getting released by the okrana tsarist secret police….because he had backers…..who are the backers? Nobody knows.
But we know beria killed stalin once uncle joe started talking about final siberian solutions for jews. That stalin climbed to the top of that jew barrel is a very interesting story worth reading about
Im reading througb a teddy roosevelt biog now. He was a patriot. A real populist sorely lacking in the gamma male infested drudgery of mateo tenzi/macron/cameron politics.
yes TR was the exact opposite of the contemporary GOP. and he was a yankee supremacist. he thought north eastern white americans were the herrenvolk.
beria was not danish, and he was executed soon after stalin’s death. stalin’s purges were effectively anti-danish even though stalin was not anti-danish. of course by contemporary american standards stalin was anti-danish. kaganovich was the only dane in his cabinet.
lenin was only 1/4 danish.
” lenin was only 1/4 danish. ”
yeah and shaq is only 1/4 black
so gullible
The soviets pushed that lie because hitler called it Judeo-Bolshevism
Lenin was a jew.
Trotsky was a jew
rosa Luxembourg was a jew
and on and on
The reason that communism failed to be popular in many nations was because
it was seen as a jewish movement.
I remember walking around Washington D.C with my grandfather and some chick
gave me a leaflet for the communist party of america. When my grandpa saw that he said ” throw it away”. Jokingly i said ” why? i might want to be a communist “. he replied ” you’re not jewish. They will never accept you ”
people of his generation were the real americans
He was the WASP version of father coughlin
Bbc ((((alan yentob)))) is showing us how multikultifuckiuppy is great.
remember. blacks are equal to whites at everything except when they’re superior.
#thinklikeafro
Where do you find this weird crap?
Uncle joe. Great man. Ww2 was national socialism vs socialism in 1 country. However was not quite a populist. Most of his backers as hitchens pointed out wete craven industrialists that wanted a right wing dictatorship not unlike the one the 400 planned under general smedley butler in the us. The key is the jewish dimension. The industrialists obviosuly rebeleed against the financial elite.
Trump is doing a n ersatz version of the same dynamic. Leading a frustrated gentile aristocracy who hate what has happened under the high iq psychopaths in a rear guard againsy zion.
So in a mnner of speaki g hitler is trumpand vice versa.
Now, the interesting question is whether trump will become a full fledged natio al socialist on economics. Everything he has said and believed would suggest he believes in nationalised healthcare and government interventions. I believe he is at heart, an ersatz national socialist purely by instinct. He believes in what is right.
And popular.
Hitler however was not quite a populist#
A fact obscured by history is that hitler was personally a nice man. Vegetarian, pro working class and sickened at the treatment of world war 1 vets. Unlike macron he won an iron cross for bravery in ww1 because h was not a gamma sly cunt.
If you listen to the surviving testomnies of people that knew him they still love him. Theres signoficant cog diss. In their hearts they know the jews won. But thats edited from the interviews and they self censor.
The grestest truth about the 20 th century is that hitler was broadly right. However his treatment of gypsies, gays, communists, the mentally retarded and mentally ill and so on were very severe. There is a good chance that i would not have made the cut hahaha.
1. still there is no evidence that operation reinhard or death via work and no food in the camps were ordered by hitler. none. this is surprising. the nazis were very good record keepers, but the third reich was much more disorganized than is commonly believed.
2. hitler was a vegetarian, because he loved animals. at the time, the nazis’ animal welfare laws were the most progressive on earth. the nazis were also extreme environmentalists.
3. unlike stalin he was very anti-smoking.
4. he was a-sexual. not gay. not straight. not interested.
I am a shadow of the man i used to be. An echo. But i have not completely lost my mind with these artificial treatments. If the only thing i wxist for now is to help stop their necromancy then so be it. Im a victim of what they once called ‘shellshock’ in a sense. I would rather die than live in a world where these evil dickheads won.
Theres a great scebe in mel gibson s new movie where the pacifists world war 1 veteran ‘shellshocked’ alco father puts on the uniform one last time and vouches for his son to be accepted for ww2. Powerful scene. The man is a complete fucking mess. A ‘loser’. Bit in that one moment he redeems himself. That might be what were talking about. A half broken man helping these young people see the great distortion in human affairs.
I suspect mel sees himself the same way. Thats why mel gibson is simply beyond criticism for me.
Mel gibson. Legend. Fighting jews his whole life. Cant even express in english the respect i have for that man.
mel inherited his anti-danism.
his father hutton is the high IQ in the family. he was a jeopardy tournament of champions winner.
the family moved to australia supposedly to avoid the vietnam draft.
everything that comes after WW I and everything that came before it cannot be understood without it.
it is the single most significant event.
it’s also noteworthy that hitler and napolean are never compared.
both were dictators following a popular anti-conservative revolution. both sought to conquer the whole of europe. both nearly did. both were defeated by the british (and their diaspora).
yet today napolean is regarded positively and hitler is the boogeyman. napolean is regarded as a liberator, hitler as a conqueror.
the obvious difference between the two is their treatment of denmark.
In this sick world of frauds, psychopaths, gammas and freaks at least we have mel gibson.
Nothing makes me happier than seeing mel do well. By all rights he should have been totalled bu the jew boycott of him. The fact hes back is a testament to the strentgh of will and courage this man has. And now hes making the passion 2. I am 100% naming my next orphan haitian baby adopted pet after mel.
but didn’t he go on an apology tour? didn’t he blame it on alcohol?
blaming it on alcohol is believable to danes, because there are basically no danish alcoholics. this is yet another proof that the danes are not superhuman and do not form a global cosa nostra.
john galliano, a homo, blamed it on alcohol too.
for any who have been habitually inebriated this is a ridiculous non-excuse. alcohol does have the effect of dis-inhibition. it does not have the effect of suggestion or hallucination. the drunk is just more honest and more talkative.
yet this excuse it is accepted by denmark. denmark is not that smart.
They didn’t accept his apology entirely because they believed it, mug of pee, but rather because Mel is too big to fail & because they wanted Mel’s fans to believe that Mel does not endorse what he said, so they shouldn’t heed his drunken words.
Had they ruined Mel for good it would have just fueled an internet backlash
Much better to contain Mel than risk ruining him
The millions of people on the Internet talking about the “Jewish problem” and the alt-right prove that Jewish power isn’t that strong at all.
By that standard no one has power. But you know people are relatively powerful when criticism is restricted to the Internet and does not appear in any mainstream media. But you’re right that because of the Internet, all elites are losing power (Jewish and Gentile).
You bring up a good point. In French Speaking Canada, it’s a great topic of discussion. The Internet is a game changer. It will destroy a lot of traditional forms of power.
In the United States and I assume much of the Anglo Prole Sphere, the citizens are so stupid and brainwashed that they believe they are still living in the 20th century.
Hitlers speeches are quite incendiary. In a good way. He uses the phrase ‘ we will not capitulate’ to the ‘bankers’ quite a lot. Hahaha.
In other news mel gibson and vince vaughan are doing a buddy cop drama about some asswupe that videotapes them doing their job on a holy sacred object of magical descent and how they have to make a living aftet being defrauded.
Mel gibson = legend. But i repeat myself.
if mass media had the same ownership it had in 1850, the world would be very different. anti-danism as promoted in The Dearborn Independent would be not un-usual.
what’s happened since, in the US at least, is the concentration of ownership of mass media and the concentration of ownership by one ethnic group, the danes. if that one ethnicity had been irish the effect would have been much less. one would have seen pro-IRA, popish, anti-british, anti-abortion etc sentiment, but one would not have seen a broadly anti non-irsh white sentiment promoted.
for almost all of human history people have lived in small groups or villages after agriculture where excluding the aristocracy, local or alien, these societies were…
1. egalitarian. very little inequality among the peasantry and none among the hunter gatherers.
2. ethnically homogeneous. there were no minorities, unless they were the rulers. like the visigoths and moors in spain or the unmixed spanish in latin america.
3. ideologically and culturally homogeneous.
4. economically independent.
this is why i conjecture that basically everyone favors the policies of national socialism except for minorities, but it is only rich and powerful minorities which can suppress the will of the people. and in this way the “far right” is conservative, except not in the sense that it seeks to maintain the current economic and political system. it is conservative in seeking to re-establish the long dead system which is far more fit for human happiness.
everyone wants to live in a mennonite, amish, or ultra orthodox jewish community, metaphorically speaking, provided inbreeding isn’t a problem and the community is much richer than these communities are in fact.
The Anglo Sphere is anything but 1-4.
I hate to trash the prole-sphere for the x time.
The barbaric Anglos are just visigoths with money in an age of globalization.
Read Spanish history and you will understand that the Visigoths were terrible rulers, unable to assimilate their subjects. My gripe with Northern Euros, especially Anglos….their lack of talent for consolidation, becomes their delusional virtue of pluralism.
“I think some of the biggest racists are actually white liberals, but they feel guilty about it and overcompensate by adopting a far left ideology”.
They just hide it better than the lower IQ reactionary (Republican) types.
You talk about the equality for blacks while spouting HBD…this is another disease that afflicts the Anglo Sphere.
What’s happening in America that it’s obvious that blacks have been deliberately displaced in the major metros by a huge influx of Hispanics and Asians via immigration. It’s called gentrification when it’s White people. Most liberals are either too stupid or deliberately silent on this issue. Conservative types are either blinded by their anger or stupidity to see this phenomenon.
This is the real gist of America’s workings when it comes to immigration. The status quo wants to rid a certain demographic.
The question is do blacks have it tougher or easier than whites in America? The left says there’s white privilege. The right says there’s black privilege (i.e. affirmative action). Who’s right?
affirmative action in school admissions is a privilege of blacks. affirmative action in hiring is not. when US businesses describe themselves as “affirmative action and equal opportunity employer” this is code for “we have a few blacks around in order to avoid law suits, but really we’re racists.”
but in terms of economic situation and public schools blacks are the least privileged people in the US after injuns. they are still effectively segregated even in cities where they’re a small % of the population. 1/3d of black men have a felony conviction.
contrary to popular belief the american south is the least racist part of the country. american neo-nazis are never southerners. why? because white people in the south actually know a lot of black people.
affirmative action in school admissions is a privilege of blacks. affirmative action in hiring is not. when US businesses describe themselves as “affirmative action and equal opportunity employer” this is code for “we have a few blacks around in order to avoid law suits, but really we’re racists.”
That’s exactly the answer I was hoping for. And it explains why blacks are not uncommon at Harvard yet they’re quite rare on the Forbes 400.
Discrimination is real but it’s mostly rational in the US. Here’s all you need to know, via the Audacious Epigone:
The only blacks who face unfair discrimination are the smart ones (like myself or maybe Afro). Most people accept whites are smarter than blacks. But if anything, they underestimate the difference between the groups.
Whites rationally discriminate against most blacks they encounter because they “subliminally” realize they have different distributions in intelligence and crime (unfortunately).
Well you got screwed over by the Ivy League. Your SAT scores were probably higher than the average black harvard student’s & yet you attended an ordinary college closing the door to opportunity
Woe unto the Black with IQ greater than the white median! We may get affirmative action goodies in college but employers don’t care! I’ve seen no evidence employers favor blacks, if anything the opposite. And the everday white treats smart blacks with lower intelligence than they have!
Sad!
they score lower on IQ tests. no one doubts that. it’s a fact. the question is why.
one of the problems with affirmative action in school admissions is that blacks with similar educational credentials to whites or asians are assumed to be dumber.
if admissions were based solely on test scores, like they are in most of the the rest of the world no distinction between affirmative action and quotas could be made and affirmative action would be unconstitutional.
if you think about it the only reason for the un-meritocratic affirmative action is the american delusion of meritocracy.
if there were no blacks at harvard it wouldn’t matter if…
1. going to harvard didn’t mean as much as it does in terms of economic opportunity.
2. not going to harvard didn’t mean the same.
i use “harvard” synecdochally.
in a non-delusional, non-shitty society what you’d want is the smartest people to be “selected”, and you’d want not being selected not to be a disaster.
but a multi-ethnic society is necessarily shitty and meritocracy is impossible as it will inevitably result in some groups being over-represented and others under-represented.
Ironically, American law schools have the most meritocratic admissions process of any admissions process in America. Because it’s fairly transparent and it’s mostly (usually 50-60%, based on the school) based on your LSAT score, with most of the rest of the weight being on GPA.
I say ironically because the legal field is filled with scumbags and cheaters.
I can’t complain too much about my college admissions because I got several full-ride scholarships to various state schools. Some based on my PSAT but I’m sure my race helped.
I did few extracurriculars in high school and my GPA wasn’t spectacular so that probably hurt me.
the least privileged group in school admissions is white gentiles who don’t have rich parents. princeton sociologist espenshade demonstrated this beyond any doubt.
when identical resumes are sent out the story is that if the name is recognizably black the response rate is significantly lower. n/a had a post on this. it’s even been claimed this is true of papers submitted to academic journals.
there is plenty of discrimination in the US, but blacks aren’t the only victims. if someone with a thick southern accent looks for a job in the north east he’ll be discriminated against. and in the US classism is 100% acceptable. among the rich or would-be rich it’s something they actually cultivate. a very large part of rich white liberals anti-racism is actually classism. overt racism is considered bad taste.
when identical resumes are sent out the story is that if the name is recognizably black the response rate is significantly lower. n/a had a post on this. it’s even been claimed this is true of papers submitted to academic journals.
Although one confound is social class since the Obama girls do not have names anyone would recognize as black; it’s largely people from the ghetto. Employers may simply be avoiding the black underclass with names like Quanesha, not blacks named Carlton Banks. The study would have been better if they used pictures instead of names though most jobs don’t require pictures.
there is plenty of discrimination in the US, but blacks aren’t the only victims. if someone with a thick southern accent looks for a job in the north east he’ll be discriminated against. and in the US classism is 100% acceptable. among the rich or would-be rich it’s something they actually cultivate. a very large part of rich white liberals anti-racism is actually classism. overt racism is considered bad taste.
Yes, antiracism is a way of signaling that you’re not white trash, but that begs the question how it became such a signal. Racism is negatively correlated with IQ, but I wonder if that’s because racism is stupid, or because smart people overthink, or because smart people are more moral, or because the smart are more brainwashed/brainwashable. Lion likes to say “smart people believe things because other smart people believe them” but I find that answer somewhat circular.
The danes create morality via their mind control rays.
What part of that are you struggling with?
But some people are just innately more compassionate. Propaganda can direct that compassion, but only if the genetic predisposition is already there. Also there is such a thing as moral reasoning.
BEfore the 1960s, how much of the population would entertain #Oscarsowhite.
Thats right.
The raci-thithm morality crusade is 100% socially constrcuted due to the liberalisation of entry into the Ivy Leagues to the jews. Sailer talks about that as the real turning point for all our woes and the 60s social ‘revolution’. It makes sense.
Smart people hide their racism better. That’s all to it. The Southern United States has the lowest IQ scores in America, and it’s the most outwardly racist region in America. They might like blacks more than Northerners, that’s because they have drifted socioeconomically for a long time. Hispanics are now doing better than blacks. They used to be on the same playing field and were allies. But not anymore!
Liberal types with higher IQs do not interact with many blacks on a personal level.
It was like some of the college professors I’ve known who talked about racism against black people and how it’s wrong. None of these individuals ever encounter blacks as co-workers or neighbors.
“the least privileged group in school admissions is white gentiles who don’t have rich parents. princeton sociologist espenshade demonstrated this beyond any doubt”.
It’s quite obvious that Jews who are so entrenched in the academic tradition and intellectual industry look down on most working class White gentiles who can’t seem to think. Do many Northeastern Irish/Italian proles come across as “cerebral”, while their Ashkenazi neighbors overthink? This is the gist of the problem when it comes to Ivy admissions.
I’ve been reading some of the forums and comments include East Asians looking down on the White working class. Prole Whites are more interested in non-academic endeavors like sports and entertainment more than Jews and Asians.
Jimmy, I’ve noticed that there is a kind of black people who are extremely good at midfield and defense player. There not very good as forwards. Perhaps it has to do with very big resistence and energy. In basketball, 75% of the NBA is black. I suppose sport is so meritocratic, that you select best people for each part, wich means a very high racial selection. Then teams don’t have to reflect each country population mixture (or race history).
“Jimmy, I’ve noticed that there is a kind of black people who are extremely good at midfield and defense player. ”
if you mean defensive midfielder, like Kante, then i think that’s true but i dont think its true for defenders.
My list of top 5 Central defenders right now
Leonardo Bonucci – White
Toby Alderweireld – White
Eric Bailly – Black
Diego Godin – White
Giorgio Chiellini – White
4 out of 5 are White
My top 5 forwards right now
Ronaldo – White ( when he doesn’t use his fake tan cream)
Messi – White
Greizmann – White
Lewandowski – White
Harry Kane – White ( i underestimated him because he’s British)
5 of 5 are white
In terms of the elite players i think that soccer is the whitest sport on the planet.
The only competition is ice hockey which is boring.
” Then teams don’t have to reflect each country population mixture (or race history).”
they may not have to according to the politically correct rules of FIFA but what France is doing is not honorable.
Its just not the gentlemanly thing to do .
Its just not the gentlemanly thing to do.
like snorting amphetamine.
Jimmy , I don’t know any about football but if you look at this picture of national english team, 6 out of 11 must have some black orgin. The same for german and french team and most of them. So football doesn’t seem to me as a very white sport like swimming or gymnatics or skiing.
https://thehimalayantimes.com/sports/rashford-sturridge-make-england-euro-2016-squad/
The ironic thing is that the Left constantly has to bring up white privilege and superiority as a way of implementing policies such as affirmative action. The funny thing is that in this statement they admit that there is a fundamental difference between the races. Then they go on ranting that all races are equal.