Milo Yiannopoulos rose to the top of the alt-right universe thanks to his incredibly high verbal IQ, flamboyant gay enthusiasm and the fact that he is fanatically pro-Trump enough to appeal to the masses yet pro-Neocon enough to appeal to the elites who manipulate those masses.
However his career appears to have imploded after the media learned he made the following comments that appeared to some to be defending pederasty:
In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationships — the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable sort of rock
This was an incredibly stupid comment on two levels: First, there’s a huge difference between young people needing adult role models and mentors who understand what they’re going through, and those adult role models having sex with them. When you’re young your sexuality is still developing and any kind of deviant or traumatic experience can permanently affect it.
Secondly, if he’s going to have a theory that disgusting, he should at least be smart enough to keep it to himself.
Verbal IQ allowed Milo to rise to the top, but a lack of Theory of Mind IQ appears to have caused him to come crashing down.
I’m reminded of a great quote from the late great J.P. Rushton who told me:
All of us have successes. All of us make mistakes. But high IQ people tend to get further ahead in life, partly because they make fewer mistakes.
One of the reasons the correlation between IQ and MEASURABLE cumulative life-time earnings might be as high as 0.5 is that free market punishes dumb mistakes. Milo just lost an incredibley lucrative book deal and he’s lost his massive platform at the well funded Breitbart.
My first clue that Milo’s Theory of Mind IQ was not that high was when he described Trump as one of the smartest people in the country; “he’s so, so clever” Milo gushed.
“You know when you talk about intelligence, there are so many different parts to it, ” a wise mentor once told me. “It’s memorization, it’s pattern recognition, it’s…”
The speed of the brain?
“That’s only one part of it!” my mentor said: “If you want a single umbrella to cover ALL of intelligence….” he said, slowly, carefully, spreading out his arms as far as they would reach to convey the utter vastness of the entity he was describing, “then it’s the ability to adapt; to take whatever situation you’re in, and turn it around to your advantage. That’s really what intelligence is”
Here we see Milo used one part of intelligence to get to the top (verbal IQ), but his lack of another part of intelligence (Theory of Mind IQ) derailed his success. In order to get to the absolute top of America, you can’t just be a one-trick pony. You must be able to adapt.
Pumpkin Person 
Oy, where do I start here.
“Milo Yiannopoulos rose to the top of the alt-right universe thanks to his incredibly high verbal IQ, flamboyant gay enthusiasm and the fact that he is fanatically pro-Trump enough to appeal to the masses yet pro-Neocon enough to appeal to the elites who manipulate those masses.”
1) Milo is not ‘altright’. He is what altrighters term ‘altlight’. That is, espousing some of their views but pushing for civic nationalism and not ethnic nationalism.
“This was an incredibly stupid comment on two levels: First, there’s a huge difference between young people needing adult role models and mentors who understand what they’re going through, and those adult role models having sex with them. When you’re young your sexuality is still developing and any kind of deviant or traumatic experience can permanently affect it.”
The point is, this is about ‘grooming’. These sick pedos groom young children.
“sexuality is still developing”
So you agree it’s a choice/environmental factors contribute to it? Interesting…
“Verbal IQ allowed Milo to rise to the top, but a lack of Theory of Mind IQ appears to have caused him to come crashing down.”
What kind of test shows how high ‘Theory of Mind IQ’ is? Is it objective? Or subjective, since you seem to be saying that because of his word choice? Plz respond.
“One of the reasons the correlation between IQ and MEASURABLE cumulative life-time earnings might be as high as 0.5 is that free market punishes dumb mistakes. Milo just lost an incredibley lucrative book deal and he’s lost his massive platform at the well funded Breitbart.”
I doubt he lost his book deal, and he’s going to start a media network or something along those lines. He says he ‘outgrew Breitbart’. OK dude, let’s say the correlation is .5, you still need to explain 75 percent of the variation.
“My first clue that Milo’s Theory of Mind IQ was not that high was when he described Trump as one of the smartest people in the country; “he’s so, so clever” Milo gushed.”
Ah, so it is based on your subjectivity, I should have known.
You have to admit that some of the things Trump has done since announcing his running have been pretty damn smart. Though you’re not ‘Murican so you wouldn’t know.
““That’s only one part of it!” my mentor said: “If you want a single umbrella to cover ALL of intelligence….” he said, slowly, carefully, spreading out his arms as far as they would reach to convey the utter vastness of the entity he was describing, “then it’s the ability to adapt; to take whatever situation you’re in, and turn it around to your advantage. That’s really what intelligence is””
Your high-school chemistry teacher is your mentor? That’s pretty damn funny.
P1: If intelligence is the ‘mental ability to adapt your behavior to your environment, only intelligent people would be around.
P2: Intelligent people aren’t the only people around.
C: Therefore, intelligence is not the ability to adapt.
Argument 2:
P1: If intelligence were the ‘mental ability to adapt your behavior to your environment, then human intelligence is the pinnacle of evolution (I could not type that with a straight face).
P2: Human intelligence is not the ‘pinnacle of evolution’.
C: Therefore, intelligence is not the mental ability to adapt.
Argument 3: (bacteria)
P1: If bacteria are adaptable at the phenotypic level, changes in environment will change the bacterial phenotype.
P2: If bacteria weren’t adaptable at the phenotypic level, changes in environment won’t change the bacterial phenotype.
P3: Bacteria DO switch their phenotype to ‘adapt’ to their changing environment
C: Therefore, bacteria ARE adaptable at the phenotypic level.
Click to access 252-262.pdf
PP says “The only truly adaptable life-form are humans, because we adapt at the phenotype level”
Refuted by Argument 3.
“Here we see Milo used one part of intelligence to get to the top (verbal IQ), but his lack of another part of intelligence (Theory of Mind IQ) derailed his success. In order to get to the absolute top of America, you can’t just be a one-trick pony. You must be able to adapt.”
One (subjective) example means that his ‘Theory of Mind IQ’ is low? ….This is not a science blog. This is pretty much a celebrity dirt rag.
And PP, I’m dying to know: does verbal ability dictate the ability to understand scientific papers? Because if so, it doesn’t seem too high since, in his fat-shaming article back in July, he completely misinterpreted 3 studies to ‘prove’ his point that fat-shaming works and he just didn’t cite anyother research THAT SHOWED it doesn’t work because it goes against his agenda.
No studies exist in the literature showing that fat-shaming works. Milo is a clown and an ideologoue. He’s not a man of science, he’s just some rag-tag homosexual Jewish journalist. The altright doesn’t like him; he’s an idiot and doesn’t know how to read scientific studies and he completely misrepresents studies for his garbage agenda.
Here is my article destroying Milo’s garbage:
Here’s another of my articles showing evidence for biochemical stress after one is fat-shamed, which leads to weight gain.
He’s an idiot. He’s not ‘high IQ’.
So you agree it’s a choice/environmental factors contribute to it? Interesting…
It’s not a choice but it probably can be influenced by life experience.
What kind of test shows how high ‘Theory of Mind IQ’ is? Is it objective? Or subjective, since you seem to be saying that because of his word choice? Plz respond.
A test where you have to predict the behavior of others. For example, I predict this comment will cause you to blather on some more.
I doubt he lost his book deal, and he’s going to start a media network or something along those lines. He says he ‘outgrew Breitbart’. OK dude, let’s say the correlation is .5, you still need to explain 75 percent of the variation.
The other 75% can be explained by stuff like luck, physical health, appearance, hard work, ambition, personality, connections, attitude etc.
You have to admit that some of the things Trump has done since announcing his running have been pretty damn smart.
I think he’s a smart guy but I also think he lucked into being the right person in the right place and time and he also had the huge advantage of coming from one of the richest families in America. I don’t think he’s a Genius but we’ll see.
P1: If intelligence is the ‘mental ability to adapt your behavior to your environment, only intelligent people would be around.
Doesn’t follow logically
P2: Human intelligence is not the ‘pinnacle of evolution’.
You have no idea what pinnacle of evolution even means or how it’s measured.
Bacteria DO switch their phenotype to ‘adapt’ to their changing environment
If bacteria are so adaptable, they wouldn’t constantly evolve into new forms of bacteria. Obviously the one they were wasn’t working.
To be precise, I think intelligence is the COGNITIVE ability to adapt, but humans are incredibly adaptable on an absolute level too.
Tardigrades.
“It’s not a choice but it probably can be influenced by life experience.”
C1: be gay
C2: be not gay
…A choice.
And let’s talk about the heritability of homosexuality, shall we?
The mean genetic percentages* for men and women are 22 and 33% respectively and are not significantly different statistically.
Click to access whitehead_twinjhs.pdf
Whitehead says neither genes nor choice; homosexuality is a unique reaction to environmental factors.
What a low heritability! and hey! the female heriatbility is the same as the brain size IQ correlation so that must be robust!
“A test where you have to predict the behavior of others. For example, I predict this comment will cause you to blather on some more.”
How would this be objective? How do you know if the other person isn’t lying?
This is why social ‘science’ is not a science. Most of the research is garbage.
“The other 75% can be explained by stuff like luck, physical health, appearance, hard work, ambition, personality, connections, attitude etc.”
So 75 percent of the variation is explained by non-genetic factors? Hmmm
“I think he’s a smart guy but I also think he lucked into being the right person in the right place and time and he also had the huge advantage of coming from one of the richest families in America. I don’t think he’s a Genius but we’ll see.”
I don’t think he’s a genius either, but he’s not as dumb as the media makes him out to be (who plays into his hand… showing they are the dumb ones).
“Doesn’t follow logically”
Explain.
You say intelligence is the ‘cognitive ability to adapt your situations to your advantage’. If this is the case, then only high IQ people would be around. High IQ people are not the only ones around. Therefore intelligence is not the ability to adapt.
“You have no idea what pinnacle of evolution even means or how it’s measured.”
We have long deemed ourselves to be at the pinnacle of cognitive abilities among animals. But that is different than being at the pinnacle of evolution in a number of important ways. As Mark Twain pointed out in 1903, to presume that evolution has been a long path leading to humans as its crowning achievement is just as preposterous as presuming that the whole purpose of building the Eiffel Tower was to put the final coat of paint on its tip. Moreover, evolution is not synonmous with progress, but simply change over time. And humans aren’t even the youngest, most recently evolved species. For example, more than 500 new species of cichlid fish in Lake Victoria, the youngest of the great African Lakes, have appeared since it filled with water some 14,500 years ago. (Herculano-Houzel, 2016: 91)
“If bacteria are so adaptable, they wouldn’t constantly evolve into new forms of bacteria. Obviously the one they were wasn’t working.”
Handwaving away my argument AND the study. Good job!
“To be precise, I think intelligence is the COGNITIVE ability to adapt, but humans are incredibly adaptable on an absolute level too.”
Why can’t it be just *ability to adapt*? Because then you’d have to include a whole slew of other animals and you think the human brain is somehow ‘special’ due to muh EQ, which it is not.
Read The Human Advantage PP. Don’t stay ignorant to the truth.
I’ve been meaning to ask you something for a while race realist.
How do you respond to the fact that It’s been shown cooking offers no extra caloric intake or the fact that brain size and tooth size are not related.
This implies cooking had little to do with our brains evolution
http://www.evoanth.net/2016/10/14/cooking-didnt-help-big-brains-evolve/
https://phys.org/news/2017-01-evolution-brain-tooth-size-linked.html
Also There are some things in your comment I wan’t to address.
“P1: If intelligence is the ‘mental ability to adapt your behavior to your environment, only intelligent people would be around.”
That’s a retarded assumption to base your argument on. You should know better.
“P1: If intelligence were the ‘mental ability to adapt your behavior to your environment, then human intelligence is the pinnacle of evolution (I could not type that with a straight face).”
Another foolish axiom. You are setting it up to fail!
“P2: Human intelligence is not the ‘pinnacle of evolution’.
C: Therefore, intelligence is not the mental ability to adapt.”
Intelligence is analogous to metaphysical, instantly gratifying, genes. Instead of a species having to wait to evolve thicker fur, longer claws, light wings etc, they have brains to make spears, clothing, and fire.
The human brain is the most complex biological structure on the planet. It IS the pinnacle of evolution. This doesn’t imply purpose.
http://www.livescience.com/50273-unlocking-the-brain-and-its-complexity.html
“Edelman is defining complexity as a highly improbable arrangement of enormous numbers of diverse molecules and compounds, interacting in intricate concatenations of systems of systems of systems of systems. Biological things are generally more complex than non-biological things. Brains are generally more complex than other biological things. Human brains are more complex than any other animal brain. If you want to split philosophical hairs, you might object that the entire biosphere is the most complex object in the known universe, or that it’s the planet Earth, or whatever arbitrarily huge chunk of spacetime. But if we’re defining an object as a semi-stable human-scale object identifiable as distinct from its surroundings, the human brain is as complex as the known world gets.”
“How do you respond to the fact that It’s been shown cooking offers no extra caloric intake or the fact that brain size and tooth size are not related.”
Cooking, whether it be plants or meat, provides more kcal because it makes food easier to digest. When you cook meat, you’re gelatinizing the collagen which makes the meat easier to chew digest.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/02/have-we-been-miscounting-calories
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2011/12/08/why-calorie-counts-are-wrong-cooked-food-provides-a-lot-more-energy/
“the fact that brain size and tooth size are not related.”
Tooth size changes due to diet.
Think about it like this.
Our intestines shrunk in length due to changing to a cooked diet which then allowed out brains to increase. So the ETA (expensive tissue hypothesis) is wrong. Even then, it really isn’t as brain size and fat-free body mass negatively correlate.
Brain size and fat deposits are negatively correlated.
Click to access 10.1038%40nature10629.pdf
We can see that the introduction of cooked foods changed the shape of the ridges on our skull which serve as attachments for the facial muscles responsible for chewing. The saggital crest on the cranium and zygomatic eminences in the cheeks exist in great apes but not us. Further, molars and canine teeth reduced in size while brain size double in erectus. The size of our bones in our jaws decreasing shows that we didn’t need to have as forceful of a bit due to the introduction of cooked foods 1-1.5 mya.
And one of the most important things that the introduction of Homo culinaris and Gourmet sapiens introduced was it decreased the amount of time to get more kcal. That’s what restricts great apes in their brain/body size relationship.
So yea, tooth size didn’t decrease specifically for brain size, but it did due to cooking and our dietary changes to cooked food which allowed the absorbstion of more nutrients and more kcal in a shorter amount of time, therefore affording a big brain.
So diet quality both drove brain size and the reduction in tooth size, not tooth size reducing due to brain size.
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/fossils/afarensis/early_hominid_dental_change.html
“That’s a retarded assumption to base your argument on. You should know better.”
Ya got me. You too PP.
“Intelligence is analogous to metaphysical, instantly gratifying, genes. Instead of a species having to wait to evolve thicker fur, longer claws, light wings etc, they have brains to make spears, clothing, and fire.”
There is no ‘pinnacle to evolution’. Believing so is ridiculous. And if the environment changes like it did for floresiensis in his new environment, we’ll evolve smaller brains over time. You know that a brain can only grow as big as ours with a high diet quality and sufficient amount of kcal. You know that great apes won’t be able to have brains our size with our amount of neurons because their diet quality doesn’t allow for it.
And you know I have no problem with the word ‘complex’, I have a problem with the phrases ‘pinnacle of evolution’ and ‘more evolved’ and ‘progressive evolution’.
Well, I wrote a lot more originally but i accidentally closed out and lost it…I’m so angry right now 😦 Like seriously I’m bummed the fuck out.
“Cooking, whether it be plants or meat, provides more kcal because it makes food easier to digest. When you cook meat, you’re gelatinizing the collagen which makes the meat easier to chew digest.”
Indeed, Cooking doesn’t increase calorie intake. It just makes food easier to chew and eat allowing you to consue more at a time.
“Tooth size changes due to diet. Our intestines shrunk in length due to changing to a cooked diet which then allowed out brains to increase. We can see that the introduction of cooked foods changed the shape of the ridges on our skull which serve as attachments for the facial muscles responsible for chewing. The saggital crest on the cranium and zygomatic eminences in the cheeks exist in great apes but not us”
By the aforementioned logic We should see a dramatic and consistent change in jaw and tooth size through out human evolution. It doesn’t though, the trend is very irregular, with us “abruptly” acquiring our well known facial traits. Homo erectus does not appear on the scene until a million years before fire is used as a tool.
http://www.livescience.com/53102-neanderthals-protruding-jaws-bone-deposits.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3348997/Why-FLAT-face-delicate-features-oddity-caused-loss-bone-explains-don-t-big-noses-skulls-Neanderthals.html
“However, all of this based on certain assumptions of how much energy the brain needs. Which was calculated by inferring how much energy it would take to fuel all our neurons. Yet recent research has found our ancestors’ brains needed more energy than could be explained by their neurons alone. Fossils show extra blood flowing into the brain, indicating there was more energy needed than included in this model. So the conclusions are dubious, to say the least.”
“And if the environment changes like it did for floresiensis in his new environment, we’ll evolve smaller brains over time. You know that a brain can only grow as big as ours with a high diet quality and sufficient amount of kcal. You know that great apes won’t be able to have brains our size with our amount of neurons because their diet quality doesn’t allow for it.”
Alright, but how does that disguise from the fact that Intelligence is the most versatile genetic trait?
“Indeed, Cooking doesn’t increase calorie intake. It just makes food easier to chew and eat allowing you to consue more at a time.”
You can literally get more caloric energy out of food, whether it be plants of meat, if it’s cooked.
“By the aforementioned logic We should see a dramatic and consistent change in jaw and tooth size through out human evolution. It doesn’t though, the trend is very irregular, with us “abruptly” acquiring our well known facial traits. Homo erectus does not appear on the scene until a million years before fire is used as a tool.”
Homo erectus appeared before fire was used as a tool and, as the article you linked last night said, the evidence shows 1 million years, though Herculano-Houzel says 1 to 1.5 mya.
That could have left mankind with neither strong jaws nor a larger brain for several hundreds of thousands of years. But Stedman argues that a quick, if small, burst in brain size immediately after the mutation could have given early man some benefit in thinking power right away. “It is plausible that right out of the blocks they gained an advantage,” Stedman says.
Humans may not have needed particularly strong jaws anyway, adds Minugh-Purvis. By then, our ancestors may have switched from eating chewy leaves all day long to snacking on smaller portions of meat, she says.
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040322/full/news040322-9.html
The introduction of soft foods into our diet is why our jaws shrank. We didn’t need strong jaws as we began eating softer foods and not tubers and the like.
So there is a correlation, but it’s not causal.
“Alright, but how does that disguise from the fact that Intelligence is the most versatile genetic trait?”
It’s based on environment. If there isn’t enough caloric energy, nor high quality foods, brain size will decrease due to the new pressure. Also have to think about island dwarfism and gigantism.
And Herculano-Houzel cites the dame Wonderwerk cave study that the article you linked did last night.
“The introduction of soft foods into our diet is why our jaws shrank. We didn’t need strong jaws as we began eating softer foods and not tubers and the like.”
You may like this:
http://www.evoanth.net/2017/01/24/nutcracker-man-seafood-fan/
Have you ever eaten raw or rare meat before? It’s significantly harder to chew. I forgot to mention in my previous comment that we didn’t acquire our completely neotenous morphology until around 50,000 years ago. The herto skulls have a very heavy brow ridge and slightly larger teeth.
“It’s based on environment.”
Ok? so…
“You can literally get more caloric energy out of food, whether it be plants of meat, if it’s cooked.”
No because when the atkins mice were given the same portion of raw and cooked food, there was no significant difference in weight gain. Meaning cooked food only gives a benefit because you consume more in the absolute sense.
“But recent studies by other authors found that hominins had larger brains before chewing teeth became smaller”
http://www.pnas.org/content/114/3/468
“You may like this”
Nice. Makes sense. Fatty acids (n-3s) are imperative for brain growth (10-20 percent of the dry weight of the brain).
“Have you ever eaten raw or rare meat before?”
No. I eat my steak medium rare. I always got well done until I finally had it medium rare and I never went back.
“Ok? so…”
…..if there is less caloric energy available, brain size (and neurons) will decrease (along with the body) and be less intelligent because that’s what the environment calls for due to the amount of caloric energy available.
“No because when the atkins mice were given the same portion of raw and cooked food, there was no significant difference in weight gain. Meaning cooked food only gives a benefit because you consume more in the absolute sense.”
Carmody and Wrangham (2016) show that a cooked diet lead to differential changes in gene expression. They show, at the molecular level, how a cooked diet lead to gene expression and positive selection for those genes in the human lineage. They say that human adaptation to a cooked diet occurred around 275kya.
https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/8/4/1091/2574082/Genetic-Evidence-of-Human-Adaptation-to-a-Cooked#45034482
They show that, contrary to what you’re saying, a cooked diet leads to more energy:
Interestingly, although free-fed cooked diets were associated with lower caloric intake than free-fed raw diets the cooked diets nevertheless allowed for weight retention whereas raw diets led to weight loss, replicating our prior finding that cooking increased net energy gain per gram of these foods ( Carmody et al. 2011 ).
You also have to think about the thermic effect of food (the increase in metabolic rate after the digestion of food; after the TEF is taken into effect, 4 kcal of protein becomes 3.2 kcal, and so some researchers argue that the caloric value for protein should be 3.2 kcal) and what our gut microbiota get to (will look into the evolution of the microbiome this week).
So 275kya there were some differences in gene expression due to a cooked diet. Since there are no differences due to agriculture between human populations today being split for 50-100kya (https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/10/08/agriculture-and-evolution-a-reply-to-the-alternative-hypothesis/), it’s clear that the positive selection didn’t occur due to the gene expression for quite some time. Carmody and Wrangham show that the biological evidence for cooking is 2mya, archaeological evidence 1mya, hearths 300kya, not too many Neanderthals controlled fire until 40 kya, and the earliest direct evidence we have of cooking appears around 50kya. We can obviously look at physiological, metabolic and diet differences between hominins and infer what was eaten. Now with looking at changes in gene expression, we can pinpoint when the positive selection began to occur. (I like the biological evidence.)
““But recent studies by other authors found that hominins had larger brains before chewing teeth became smaller””
This result points to different ecological and behavioral factors influencing the evolution of hominin teeth and brains.
Like diet and what was available to eat.
The evolution of human masticatory complex is strongly related to diet, the use of tools and fire, and finally speech, and has a more important part in the evolution of mankind than the dentists know.
Tools because we could mash and cut food, fire because it softened food making it easier to chew.
It has been hypothesized that the invention of pottery and changes in food production following the use of pottery, relaxed the selective forces on the masticatory system and the onset of probable mutation effect resulted in a consequent reduction in tooth size (45).
Emes Y, Aybar B, Yalcin S. The evolution of human jaws: A review. Bull Int Paleodont 2011;5:37-47.
“…..if there is less caloric energy available, brain size (and neurons) will decrease (along with the body) and be less intelligent because that’s what the environment calls for due to the amount of caloric energy available.”
I get that, I just want to know your point.
“They show that, contrary to what you’re saying, a cooked diet leads to more energy:
Interestingly, although free-fed cooked diets were associated with lower caloric intake than free-fed raw diets the cooked diets nevertheless allowed for weight retention whereas raw diets led to weight loss, replicating our prior finding that cooking increased net energy gain per gram of these foods ( Carmody et al. 2011 ).”
I’m aware of that study but the atkins mice one I showed you was actually a direct response to the particular one Cramody. Carmody was not controlling for the proper variables like food portion. Secondly:
“However, all of this based on certain assumptions of how much energy the brain needs. Which was calculated by inferring how much energy it would take to fuel all our neurons. Yet recent research has found our ancestors’ brains needed more energy than could be explained by their neurons alone. Fossils show extra blood flowing into the brain, indicating there was more energy needed than included in this model. So the conclusions are dubious, to say the least.”
“Like diet and what was available to eat.”
Oh I’m sure that was a factor. A discussion you may be interested in:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/encephalization-of-early-hominids.145308/
There are two debating. One for cooking the other for the redundancy hypothesis.
I’m pissed. I had an extensive reply ready and xed it out accidently so don’t mind me if my reply is short, my next will be better.
“I get that, I just want to know your point.”
Brain size will decrease without the proper foodstuffs. There are upward and downward trends in hominin brain evolution. It’s, obviously, based on environment.
“I’m aware of that study but the atkins mice one I showed you was actually a direct response to the particular one Cramody. Carmody was not controlling for the proper variables like food portion.”
They didn’t control for portion size to see what would happen when mice were fed a cooked diet and raw diet. Cooked meat increases the bioavailability of the food and denatures the protein making it easier to chew and digest. They talk about the thermal effect of cooking, I talk about the thermic effect of food. When food is cooked you can obtain more energy from it. Whatever you eat—whether it’s cooked or not—takes energy to process by the body. So since the bioavailability is increased due to food being in a cooked state, it’s more nutritious than a raw foods diet. You also have to think about the TEF, and since protein has the highest TEF it’s 3.2 kcal after that’s taken into account. You also have to think of the link between the microbiome and the brain, there is evidence that gut microbiota may influence the brain and behavior (http://www.nature.com/news/the-tantalizing-links-between-gut-microbes-and-the-brain-1.18557). They also consume the food you eat, so what’s left over after bodily processes is then used for our organs.
“Secondly”
Blood flow to the brain increased by 600 percent compared to brain size which increased 350 percent in 3my. This is partly due to becoming bipedal and tool use which allowed us to mash and dice foods, which is a loose definition of ‘cooking’.
Great apes also prefer cooked foods.
Click to access 10.1016%40j.jhevol.2008.03.003.pdf
Fossils show increased blood flow to the brain due to other pressures that increased brain size beginning 3mya.
“Oh I’m sure that was a factor.”
It most definitely is.
“There are two debating. One for cooking the other for the redundancy hypothesis.”
Nice discussion. The one person says it’s ‘just a theory’. That’s one of my biggest pet peeves. People assume that it just means ‘a guess’. It doesn’t matter how one thinks of a theory. Rushton formulated his GST theory because he noticed that in colleges, people stick with those who are genetically similar to themselves, whether it be on ethnicity or other traits. And this was empirically verified showing that best friends are related on the magnitude of 4th cousins and that spouses are genetically similar as well—no matter if their the same ethny or not.
The other guy also cites Aiello as saying:
Brain tissue is metabolically expensive, but there is no significant correlation between relative basal metabolic rate and relative brain size in humans and other encephalized animals. The expensive tissue hypothesis suggests that the metabolic requirements of relatively large brains are offset by a corresponding reduction of the gut. The splanchinc organs [liver and gastrointestinal tract] are as metabolically expensive as brains, and the gut is the only one of the metabolically expensive organs in the human body that is markedly small in relation to body size.
I already showed the ETH is wrong about. Brain size and fat mass negatively correlate. Our guts shrank due to the introduction of softer foods.
Further, a higher BMR and brain size definitely are correlated.
In multivariate regressions including body size and physical activity, human TEE exceeded that of chimpanzees and bonobos, gorillas and orangutans by approximately 400, 635 and 820 kcal day−1, respectively, readily accommodating the cost of humans’ greater brain size and reproductive output. Much of the increase in TEE is attributable to humans’ greater basal metabolic rate (kcal day−1), indicating increased organ metabolic activity. Humans also had the greatest body fat percentage. An increased metabolic rate, along with changes in energy allocation, was crucial in the evolution of human brain size and life history.”
Click to access 10.1038%40nature17654.pdf
Humans are well adapted to lose heat due to our tropical origins. Read this paper by Daniel Lieberman:
Click to access 2015a.pdf
See the radiator theory of human evolution, stating that the evolution of cooling mechanisms released constraints on the evolution of brain size in hominins.
Click to access 429bf0558528551528451af572ab0abd3c54.pdf
Higher fitness is correlated with an expansion of the hippocampus and other regions in the brain.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4939291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356485/
“I’m pissed. I had an extensive reply ready and xed it out accidently so don’t mind me if my reply is short, my next will be better.”
You’re fine lol.
“It’s, obviously, based on environment.”
I’m not really seeing how this means intelligence isn’t a versatile trait?
“They didn’t control for portion size to see what would happen when mice were fed a cooked diet and raw diet. Cooked meat increases the bioavailability of the food and denatures the protein making it easier to chew and digest.”
That’s the issue though, because the food wasn’t portioned equally it skews the results.
“I talk about the thermic effect of food.”
What is the thermic effect of food?
“Nice discussion. ”
What I was particularly interested in, was the fact that one user pointed out how cooking isn’t a selection pressure, and how this dilemma quickly turns into a chicken-egg question
“See the radiator theory of human evolution, stating that the evolution of cooling mechanisms released constraints on the evolution of brain size in hominins.”
the redundancy hypothesis claims the exact opposite,
“Not error but failure is the problem. The hypothesis is that a brain with multiple sets of neurons running in parallel for control of critical functions (breathing, swallowing, adrenal gland output, heart rate and timing, coordination of voluntary muscle contraction), any one of which is minimally sufficient to respond to a given stimulus with proper output signal, is less likely to fail under heat stress. The principle of guarding against heat stress failure by incorporating redundant circuitry is standard in integrated circuit design.”
“There is also extra capacity in the SAN, and in the direct response firing synapses on the heart itself. But the interesting extra capacity would be the hypothetical overgrowth the heat stress hypothesis imagines to have emerged in the parts of the brain handling conscious thought and environmental awareness – these redundancies would be incrementally beneficial to a being with a foraging strategy involving long distance exertion and complex decision making at midday across African grasslands. And then they would be available, during leisure hours, for conscious thought and complex awareness of no immediate benefit.”
https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5403
https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/electronic_electrical/
“I’m not really seeing how this means intelligence isn’t a versatile trait?”
Wouldn’t you say that intelligence is based on the environment and types of foodstuffs around? Let’s say 50 hominins split from their group of 100 into a novel environment. The new environment has less energy and the types of life on the island are small. Would that hominin become less intelligent compared to the parent population due to the new environment and caloric energy available?
“That’s the issue though, because the food wasn’t portioned equally it skews the results.”
But the TEF comes into play, that’s what you don’t understand (will explain below).
“What is the thermic effect of food?”
The amount of energy expenditure above the basal metabolic rate due to the cost of processing food and its storage. So if you’re cooking food before you ingest it, you bypass a lot of the processing that happens internally after digestion, allowing you to extract close to 100 percent of the kcal contained in the food. The TEF is something that I’ve neglected to speak about in all of my articles on this subject because it skipped my mind. I will write a full post on it soon.
Our microbiome also play a part with our behavior and our brain. You should look into that. I read a book on the microbiome. We are only 10 percent human.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/10-human-alanna-collen/1120419083
Great book.
“What I was particularly interested in, was the fact that one user pointed out how cooking isn’t a selection pressure, and how this dilemma quickly turns into a chicken-egg question”
Screw the chicken and egg question
Notice the slight increase with the australopithecines. That’s due to the advent of a bipedal pelvis and tool use. The tool use allowed us to mash and pulverize food. Daniel Lieberman says in his book The Story of the Human Body that after we left the trees, we became bipedal. Bipedal walking conserves 75 percent more calories compared to knuckle-walking.
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/30/12265.abstract
That was huge for our increasing brain size/neuronal count. Exercise/endurance running was also critical. Bipedalism is really a prime mover of human brain size because, without it, we would not have been able to have the primate brains that have the most neurons packed into the cerebral cortex. Bipedal walking freed the use of our hands which allowed for tool use and that further increased brain size. The discovery of fire and meat eating pushed it over the top.
What you’re talking about has to do with exercise performance.
See how beneficial exercise is to us:
There is no evidence that brain tissue are more or less sensitive to heat stress compared to any other tissue.
Given that selective brain cooling during heat stress has never been adequately proven in humans and even doubtful in other mammals [31–33], it is plausible that protection from thermal injury to the brain might be explained by the mathematical/reliability model proposed by Fialkowski [24, 27]. Built-in redundancy in a biological system vital for survival is likely to be more robust and able to cope with a changing environment and a plausible step in the evolutionary process.
Click to access 10.1159%40000151545.pdf
(^ The captcha for that one was ‘progun’.)
Fiałkowski’s hypothesis is shown here to be based on measurements that are seriously inaccurate, and the explanatory mechanism to be contradicted by existing data on response to heat stress by smaller-brained nonhuman primates.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/articles/3116915/
“Would that hominin become less intelligent compared to the parent population due to the new environment and caloric energy available?”
Ok? The brain is an expense tissue, what else is new?
“I will write a full post on it soon.”
I look forward to it.
“Screw the chicken and egg question”
Well, in the eloquent words of Quantum Quack:
“The issue of the egg before the chicken can not so easily be dismissed in a organic system that requires bio feedback loops to function and the evolution of successful bio feedback loops to achieve a sustainable evolution.”
“Notice the slight increase with the australopithecines. That’s due to the advent of a bipedal pelvis and tool use. The tool use allowed us to mash and pulverize food. Daniel Lieberman says in his book The Story of the Human Body that after we left the trees, we became bipedal. Bipedal walking conserves 75 percent more calories compared to knuckle-walking.”
It seems you’re not understanding. Cooking is not a selection pressure, neither is tool use or bipedalism. Bipedalism is a response to other selection pressures, while tool use and cooking is a socially learned trait. Chimps do not have the actual brain power to allow new innovations to distribute throughout a population. If you taught one chimp to use fire, it would not be incrementally improved upon.
Diet change is not a selection pressure, finding food in a resource deprived area is though. If the environment in question is cognitively demanding but at the same time devoid of food, then brain size will not decrease, instead the body will, which is what you see in East asians. There was simply too much pressure to have a big brain.
“There is no evidence that brain tissue are more or less sensitive to heat stress compared to any other tissue.”
That’s not true though, both your feet, hands and head are big sources of heat loss
“Fiałkowski’s hypothesis is shown here to be based on measurements that are seriously inaccurate, and the explanatory mechanism to be contradicted by existing data on response to heat stress by smaller-brained nonhuman primates.”
Interesting, do you have a pdf for the link? I can only find the abstract and they are trying to make me pay to read the whole thing.Don’t get it twisted, Im not really a proponent of that hypothesis, the idea itself is not wrong but it doesn’t surprise me the model is over-splicistic. Whether it was socializing, resource acquisition or heat stress there has to of been a catalyst for the necessary brain power for cultural learning.
Something I forgot to mention, that Alieo Quote was actually reinforcing the ETH
“Brain tissue is metabolically expensive, but there is no significant correlation between relative basal metabolic rate and relative brain size in humans and other encephalized animals. The expensive tissue hypothesis suggests that the metabolic requirements of relatively large brains are offset by a corresponding reduction of the gut. The splanchinc organs [liver and gastrointestinal tract] are as metabolically expensive as brains, and the gut is the only one of the metabolically expensive organs in the human body that is markedly small in relation to body size.”
Let’s continue our conversation here:
“Interesting, do you have a pdf for the link? I can only find the abstract and they are trying to make me pay to read the whole thing.Don’t get it twisted, Im not really a proponent of that hypothesis, the idea itself is not wrong but it doesn’t surprise me the model is over-splicistic. Whether it was socializing, resource acquisition or heat stress there has to of been a catalyst for the necessary brain power for cultural learning.”
PDF is here:
Click to access 10.2307%4029539802.pdf
“That’s not true though, both your feet, hands and head are big sources of heat loss”
Quote from paper:
There are no available data indicating that brain tissue is more or less sensitive to thermal injury compared to other tissue.
I’m talking about thermal injury; not heat loss.
“Something I forgot to mention, that Alieo Quote was actually reinforcing the ETH”
I addressed this in my article.
What are these weird symbols?
“What are these weird symbols?”
Huh?
milo’s high VIQ…
according to wikipedia he was born milo hanrahan.
hanrahan is an IRISH surname.
and he claims that his mother’s mother was a jew.
so he’s at most 1/4 jew, 1/4 greek.
The custom is that jewishness is decided by the mother. So milos mother is technically jewish culturally anyway.
With jew and irish genes i imagine milo has a large vocabulary for male gebitalia in his locker.
” so he’s at most 1/4 jew, 1/4 greek.”
Whiny is so desperate to rationalize the acceptance of that degenerate.
with jews you lose.
with gay jews you lose and you feel sore afterwards.
i want catherine rampell inside me.
but her voice is horrible.
this is for afro, all guidos, and anti-semites.
peepee is socially retarded.
milo is just going to be even bigger after this. he said this a year ago, and who didn’t know that homos were also child molesters? the mayor of portland finished his term after it was discovered he’d had sex with an underage male prostitute. if he’d been straight, he’d’ve been forced to resign.
trump’s enemies prove once again how they don’t understand fame and mass media. they’re social retardates. remember this?
trump is in the 99+th percentile for social intelligence.
“theory of mind” doesn’t exist except in the minds of autists like peepee.
trump is in the 99+th percentile for social intelligence.
Maybe, but nowhere near that in overall intelligence.
there’s no theory.
there’s direct perception.
You mean like ESP? 🙂
Agitation and reactivity are the defining characters of Theory of Mind. The fact is that you can tell how a person is by what upsets them. This is negative theory of mind. Positive theory of mind is what will make a person like you. It gets more complicated after that because (TOM) also goes into prediction. Intuitively you can understand emotion but Cognitively to understand how a person behaves is a skill or talent that people can have both but it is rather subtle. I have a hard time predicting people but emotionally I can understand people to such an extent that I rarely make mistakes. It is the difference between who they are and what they do.
Trump has high cognitive theory of mind. I have high emotional theory of mind. This is the reason I voted for Trump. Many people were too fixed in their bubble to realize that Clinton on an emotional level is a person that cannot be trusted. People think that because Trump is loud and rude that he cannot be trusted. The complete opposite is the case. Clinton has built up resentment and hates people and is a puppet. I know intuitively and emotionally she is faking it. She cannot be trusted.
Even if I don’t know what Clinton will do on a cognitive level I understand that when she said we must go hard on Russia that she was exactly like Bush and Obama. Obama bombed Libya, ISIS is now in charge of Lybia. She would do the same to Syria. I understood that she would place ISIS in charge of Syria. Trump said he would bomb the shit out of ISIS. To me it seems that you cannot Trust Bush, You cannot Trust Clinton. John Mccain is worse than Obama, and Obama may be a nice person but he controlled by the CIA. that is why Obama Bombed Lybia. He is a puppet.
Cognitive and emotional theory of mind work together. But it takes practice. I only have so much experience with people to predict their actions. I don’t have the street smarts like Trump does. But I do get feelings about people, that something isn’t right or that maybe I should just keep quite on certain subjects. I don’t push button. I am quiet and I observe people. What upsets them and what doesn’t. Should I trust them or shouldn’t I. Can I be open with them I can I not be open with them. Trump understands what people will do because he makes deals all the time. I understand the being of person because I observe reactivity and agitation, mood and affect.
If Milo doesn’t understand the repulsion people feel at what he said then his intuition is lacking. Language is intuitive but self-intuition is different than affect intuition. I can perfectly say things that feel right to me but feel wrong to others. Understanding what feels right to others is characterized by whom you are speaking to. Reflection is necessary for understanding others reactions. Trump knows his audience. He is popular with certain people because he knows what to say. He has energy. He doesn’t care what people think of him as long as his message reaches the right people. Milo made a mistake because the people he was trying to reach don’t feel the same way. Milo said what he felt and did not reflect on what others would feel.
Theory of mind is about reflection, either on actions or feelings. There is not test for reflection but if you could measure it would be a cognitive trait that influence intelligence in a very real way. Street smarts is g loaded even if there is not subtest for street smarts. If it was included in IQ tests it would lower the IQ of some and increase the IQ of others. Reflection is a for of intelligence. Pumkin says adaptable people make less mistakes but the ability to rebound from mistake is also important. Metacognition tells you how to correct mistakes by self-evaluation, that is what adaptability is. Self-evaluation / reflection / theory of mind / intuition. All of these should be included in IQ but the tests are inadequate to measure them. Rationality is another trait that has been measured but not by IQ tests. Mistakes come in many forms, we need better measurements that simple IQ tests.
peepee is socially retarded.
milo is just going to be even bigger after this. he said this a year ago, and who didn’t know that homos were also child molesters? the mayor of portland finished his term after it was discovered he’d had sex with an underage male prostitute. if he’d been straight, he’d’ve been forced to resign.
trump’s enemies prove once again how they don’t understand fame and mass media. they’re social retardates. remember this?
He is finished as a figure of the right and thats all that matters.
his views make him unacceptable to the left and now this has pushed him over the edge with the minority of right wingers who tolerated him.,
Milos handlers wanted him to turn the alt-right into libertarianism and that is just not going to happen.
They cant put the jinni back into the bottle.
Whit nationalism is the only logical step to take when faced with demographic replacement.
I disagree with racerealist when he says that white nationalism is not viable.
Give the blacks Atlanta, Baltimore, Detroit, and other cities states around the country.
Give the Hispanics San Antonio, Miami and other city states around the country.
The other 90% of the country goes to whites.
Its logistically feasible and highly desirable.
The feds killed Malcolm X because he was calling for separation.
Marcus Garvey was another great black man.
how many people had heard of milo until yesterday or the recent incident at UCB? he gives a press conference and lots of reporters show up!
he’d outgrown breitbart a long time ago.
his book deal was cancelled. he will now sign for at least twice as much with another publisher.
a woman who’d never heard of him told me. “he’s brilliant and gorgeous. he could have done anything, but he decided to be a weirdo.”
he’s not an ideologue. he’s a comedian. he’s fluent but shallow. his shtick is making fun of UCB professors. it’s the same thing limbaugh’s done for decades. it’s fish in a barrel, but it’s still funny.
Comedian. Yes.
Thats the thing.
Being a half jew gay magic negrophile gives him zions pokemon social forcefield to say these things.
A straigt white man could not have arisen like this.
Once milo completes his beachead. Time for the real party to start.
The alt rights intellectuals are several orders of ability better than the sjws. And yet, i agree with jimmy that certain elements of the alt right may be jewphilic. But if jimmy were to list these people they would invariably be a part of the national review nexus or saying the asian/jew is great stuff to slide the rac-ism under the table.
In the end ‘rac-ism’ will have to be ironically DECONSTRUCTED using familiar nietschea etymology.
“I disagree with racerealist when he says that white nationalism is not viable.”
How so? I’ve seen these ideas around before. Let’s say a separation does happen and the ethnostate occurs. They’d get him bed to hell and back by Murica and allies. There’d be no way to have a military to beat Murica.
How is it feasible that the government would balkanize? That’s another white nationalist fantasy. It won’t happen.
If any separation occurs it’d be quelled pretty quickly.
Theres like 40 million of both demographics. So having them live in cities would be too crammed. Id say give the blacks the missispi river, Some of virignia and north carolina, as well as the black parts of georgia and south carolina, all rgions with their repsective ports. For the north detroit and baltimore is enough. All linked by the ocean. The hispanics can take some cities and new mexico.
“then it’s the ability to adapt”
If you define it like this, emotional and psychological predispositions that have nothing to do with the way one analyses and implements information based on rational factors are elements of “Intelligence”
We’ve been through this, the whole of ones ability to adapt is not intelligence but the latter is a part of the former.
To give an example in aid of explanation: If I was pathologically angry and it just so happened to allow me to solve problems in my life effectively the decision to do so is not intelligent and the result is incidental.
This is why I think the term “Adaptation” in particular is misleading, because it implies that any given situation an intelligent person is presented with he “Ought” to adapt to, implying he “Can” adapt to it despite preventative factors of personality.
If you define it like this, emotional and psychological predispositions that have nothing to do with the way one analyses and implements information based on rational factors are elements of “Intelligence”
My mentor said ability to adapt but it was obvious from the parts of intelligence he described that he meant cognitive ability to adapt. Intelligence by definition is a cognitive trait.
But it’s always good to be precise too
But in practice you’re assigning this “fall” to a failure of Milo’s cognitive profile when it’s equally as plausible that he has emotional defects which are an impediment to his decision making; when you see the kind of life choices he’s made in life with respect to self-destruction evidence for that case certainly emerges.
You could be right gypsy; maybe he just has a strong emotional
need to be contrarian or provocative despite knowing the risks.
This is an IQ blog so I’m biased in favor of cognitive explanations but its good to get alternative perspectives
the kind of life choices he’s made*
I think Galton himself alluded intelligence being the ability to adapt when he noted that the Chinese thrived in every country they found themselves in, competing with strangers “wherever they may reside”–“notwithstanding his timidity”. The comment about the Chinese being timid (according to Galton) is interesting because he seems to have been teasing out social and emotional characteristics to focus on more cognitive ones.
No, I am not saying this makes the Chinese more intelligent: the fact that they’ve spent most of the last few centuries in the doldrums would argue against that. But Galton’s ideas are interesting precisely because, as the first real intelligence researcher, he appreciated the fact that adaptability might be rooted more in cognition than in other psychological traits (social skills, emotional intelligence).
Milo is an extreme provocateur, he likes to be transgressive and dislikes impediments to his experimental personality.
In Scott Adam’s lexicon he’s the ultimate systems thinker.
When long-term goals are not your priority you make missteps, but the system you built gives you a certain amount of buoyancy anyway; Gypsy’s conclusion: Reports of Milo’s death have been greatly exaggerated.
“This is an IQ blog so I’m biased in favor of cognitive explanations but its good to get alternative perspectives”
There it is.
And no, this quote isn’t taken out of context. =^)
And when defining intelligence, it’s a question of sufficiency.
Adaptation is a necessary element in the explanation, but is it a sufficient explanation in and of itself?
I propose it is not.
Probably the best interpretation of intelligence i can think of is.
Its in the eye of the beholder.
Like beauty.
Its exists fairly objectively.
But beauty can be measured more accurately.
The philosophrr thanks for knowing the truth about this racist mongrel race realist. He thinks he can pull will over our eyes with this scientific racism. Most of his garbage racist blithering are not even proper science they are psedo science with racist leanings. He conceals his ugly antiblack anti Jew racism with flowery pseudo science euphemisms. And that pathetic blog of him which is full of pseudo sciencee, hoax theories, false philosophies, cherry picking to insult blacks, distorted science. Quoting white supremacist pigs work, inflating statistics to make a point. He does all this and yet we want that ugly mongrel race realist to believe that he is neutral. Truth is he likes all those white supremacists likeJared fart Taylor , David Duke and worships them. None of racer realist blog materials are true they all are distortions from the truth. Avoid that pig like a plague
You’re not forced to be be friends with RR but you should try to reconcile with paragraphs.
You’re a trip man.
” Most of his garbage racist blithering are not even proper science they are psedo science with racist leanings. ”
People say this a lot. Yet never provide evidence of this, nor do they ever provide counter arguments. Wonder why…
” He conceals his ugly antiblack anti Jew racism with flowery pseudo science euphemisms. And that pathetic blog of him which is full of pseudo sciencee, hoax theories, false philosophies, cherry picking to insult blacks, distorted science. ”
Care to show me this? Please provide links to my writings that back your assertion.
” Truth is he likes all those white supremacists likeJared fart Taylor , David Duke and worships them. ”
I don’t “worship” anyone. I respect them though.
“None of racer realist blog materials are true they all are distortions from the truth. Avoid that pig like a plague”
You’ve made an assertion now back your claim. I have 163 posts to go through. Choose one, comment on it and we can discuss.
Then you can stop this bullshit you’re spewing when I take you to school.
And if you’d have actually read my blog, the last post I did on race was on prostate cancer. Whoa, the anti-black racism is strong!
If you’d have red my blog you’d have seen that I’ve been writing about ancient hominid evolution for the past two months.
But it’s OK man, talk out of your ass with baseless assumptions without ever showing me which of my articles are pseudoscience, hoax theories and cherry picking. I’d love to see it.
Put up or shut up.
There is literally only one post about race on my front page and it’s refuting some Afrocentrists moron on YouTube.
Fuck off with your bullshit bro.
Gypsy has changed my mind on this issue.
But to take his analogy further. Beauty is enhanced by being sex starved. Nevertheless you could posit that intelligence exists despite a range of countervailing factors gypsy. Its just we can quantify being ahot headed and strip it out in the metrics over a number of scenarios.
However to say, stand alone, the ability to adapt is not a complete definition.
Should the philosopher aim for complete definitions?
In any case we can now say the ability to adapt despite countervailing factors not linked to cognition wither intrinsicallly or extrinsically.
Good.
>Nevertheless you could posit that intelligence exists despite a range of countervailing factors gypsy.
Intelligence is in most cases the number one, head honcho, big cheese factor in adaptation.
It’s just not the only factor.
If you’re an emotional child, you can have a sky-high IQ and still crash and burn; if this blog teaches you anything well… do I even need to go on?
I think cognition evolved to adapt to our emotional and physical incentives & those incentives evolved to replicate genes.
If I had to offer an explanatory theory myself I’d suggest that PP is right, but:
Early “life” or the organizations of matter that would become “life” incidentally developed emotions via mutation. This is all perfunctory and implied by PP’s theory but my own offering is a prediction: At the point that emotions were developed selection became dramatically less randomized and dramatically more self-selecting resulting in an explosion of life.
My two cence.
Self-awareness is the true origin of intelligence.
Emotions arise internally.
Self-awareness is internal control.
And it is internal control that allows external control.
If you can control yourself you are most likely intelligent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_theory
Intelligence is mechanical; don’t overcomplicate your definitions by including psychological factors that have other proper places.
The point of my definition is to seperate one from the other and show the extent to which emotions can affect the performance of intelligence.
The intelligence itself is an indepedent factor.
By mechanical you mean such as that with only 6 fingers instead of ten prevents you from playing the piano. Then intelligence is like having more fingers to play. The ability to mentally manipulate variable. When I am tired I am less intelligent. I can handle less variables and at slower speed. My brother is very mechanical in that he plays puzzle games and makes things and does projects. I gave up on doing games with lots of items. I like games with story options. My motor skills are poor even though I got 125 on block design I still type with two fingers. If all mechanism are added together it seems there should still be more mechanisms than IQ tests measure. Even though my brother is good with item lists he is not good with novelty or story options. We both are poor on first person shooter games. Because of my poor motor skills I had to play games that required novelty and open endedness. But I don’t play games anymore. It just seems that IQ test don’t measure all mechanisms.
I suppose so.
It’s a mistake to define intelligence in terms of what we do with it, as you did and others have done because that’s mediated by personality. You can be extraordinarily intelligent and have little self-awareness because, for example, you’re very narcissistic.
It’s not that said person lacks the ability to analyse themselves or recognize the pattern they exhibit should they be inclined to do so, but their personal disposition and bias prevents them from doing so.
It’s a mistake to define intelligence in terms of what we do with it, as you did and others have done because that’s mediated by personality.
That’s like saying it’s a mistake to define the digestive system by what it does because that’s mediated by the foods we eat. Without describing the function of a system, it’s just a bunch of isolated parts with no single umbrella to unite them. The digestive system converts our food into energy just as intelligence computes solutions to the problems our body and emotions (personality) feel.
You can be extraordinarily intelligent and have little self-awareness because, for example, you’re very narcissistic.
And you can have an extraordinarily good digestive system, and still feel sick because you’re eating unhealthy foods. You can be extraordinarily intelligent and flunk an IQ test because you have no motivation, but without measurement and observation, intelligence becomes a non-scientific concept. Now granted, real life behavior is one of the messiest areas to observe intelligence, but it’s also the most important and the arena where intelligence evolved in the first place.
It’s not that said person lacks the ability to analyse themselves or recognize the pattern they exhibit should they be inclined to do so, but their personal disposition and bias prevents them from doing so.
In that case we can say “X is extremely cognitively adaptable, but not cognitively adaptable to reach the goals of his ego while also reaching his other life goals. His goals are mutually exclusive, and no amount of intelligence can adapt to such a dysfunctional personality”. There’s no problem defining intelligence functionally as long as one doesn’t confuse its function with the functions of other systems it serves.
>because that’s mediated by the foods we eat.
If I wanted to, I could easily define intelligence as “Ones ability to perform well academically” and it would be at least as acceptable as “Ones ability to adapt”; both describe what intelligence has the potential to do unfettered, both fail to describe what it is in a more general sense.
>but without measurement
I’m not arguing with you about measurements, I’m arguing about the woeful inadequacy of your definition in explaining the thing it is trying to explain.
>In that case we can say …
Or we can say
“It’s not that any given person of high intelligence lacks the intellectual ability, it’s that their psych profile disallows them from doing as they’d be able to otherwise”
Same difference, but without the tortured language.
“to reach the goals of his ego while also reaching his other life goals. ” reads so poorly, when all you mean is: “his egotism disallows him from certain intellectual endeavours despite high intellect”
If I wanted to, I could easily define intelligence as “Ones ability to perform well academically” and it would be at least as acceptable as “Ones ability to adapt”; both describe what intelligence has the potential to do unfettered, both fail to describe what it is in a more general sense
Academic ability is a subset of adaptive cognition so the latter is the general sense.
“It’s not that any given person of high intelligence lacks the intellectual ability, it’s that their psych profile disallows them from doing as they’d be able to otherwise”
Same difference, but without the tortured language.
Still a pretty long sentence. It’s easy to avoid tortured language when you substitute a word for its definition. But defining intelligence was precisely the point.
“to reach the goals of his ego while also reaching his other life goals. ” reads so poorly, when all you mean is: “his egotism disallows him from certain intellectual endeavours despite high intellect”
I’m not sure if that reads much better, but more importantly, doesn’t define intelligence.
“His goals are mutually exclusive” In fact this language is very misleading; in the mind of the biased and pathological often they will simply not bother to observe certain patterns altogether. In other words, it simply isn’t a goal for him.
I know you’re using goal in the more abstracted sense of a theoretical goal of achieving say, an analysis of certain features that you’re disallowed from performing via pathology rather than necessarily a conscientious objective, but it’s still tortured language and in being so fails to explain the concept well.
This is all a shame, because intelligence is a wonderfully simple concept: The brain’s ability to collect and utilise data according to any given individual’s incentive structure.
“His goals are mutually exclusive” In fact this language is very misleading; in the mind of the biased and pathological often they will simply not bother to observe certain patterns altogether. In other words, it simply isn’t a goal for him.
It depends on the person.
This is all a shame, because intelligence is a wonderfully simple concept: The brain’s ability to collect and utilise data according to any given individual’s incentive structure.
Or simply the cognitive ability to advance our goals. There’s an infinite number of ways one can define intelligence and all say pretty much the same thing, some more poetically or precisely than others. I happen to love defining intelligence as the ability to adapt even though I understand the ambiguity. There’s just something very beautiful about it and I love the evolutionary metaphor it invokes because I see intelligence as a kind of crowning evolutionary achievement. But I’ll try to be more precise in the future.
In other words, we have different goals and incentive structures. You want precision and I want beauty and metaphor. 🙂
“adaptive cognition so the latter is the general sense.”
Adaptive cognition, as in the brain’s ability to process and use information absent impediment, sure.
I’m not disagreeing with your definition as far as it extends to necessity, I’m arguing on the grounds of sufficiency. Adaptive Cognition is indeed an accurate description of what intelligence is but it does not fully explain it. I explained the grounds I was arguing on before.
“I’m not sure if that reads much better, but more importantly, doesn’t define intelligence.”
Definitions are rooted in explanations, PP.
It’s all well and good to say that intelligence allows you to self-reflect, or that it’s a process why which you adapt, or it allows you to do schoolwork or devise a method by which you will never fall down the stairs and all of these are necessary definitions, but they are not sufficient in explaining intelligence.
And to explain intelligence we need to explain cognition, pattern recognition, and the use of that thereafter (Adaptation) and noteably that all adaptation is necessarily contextualized by incentive structures.
This is why it’s not enough to simply define it functionally, one must explain how it functions.
Necessity =/ sufficiency.
This is why it’s not enough to simply define it functionally, one must explain how it functions.
But the explanation is different for different things. How the human brain cognitive adapts is very different from how an alien brain might cognitive adapt or how artificial intelligence cognitively adapts. In the end, intelligence seems only functionally definable.
“I think cognition evolved to adapt to our emotional and physical incentives & those incentives evolved to replicate genes”
I can get behind this. Now wrote a substantial and sourced post on it.
It’s really very simple, I feel like the language of adaptation temps everybody who uses it down the garden path of presumption.
Presumption that any given persons failings or merits were achieved on the basis of cognition; it implies that they “Adapted” in a cognitive sense when most apparent adaptations are more easily explained as incidental results of a psychological profile.
One reason psychologists have never agreed on a definition of intelligence is perhaps that each definition reflects values. Someone who values academic success might define intelligence as the ability to learn. Someone who values practical success might define intelligence as the cognitive ability to problem solve or adapt. In subtle ways, our choice of words, even when we all technically mean the same thing, gives status to some at the expense of others.
>How the human brain cognitive adapts is very different from how an alien brain might cognitive adapt or how artificial intelligence cognitively adapts.
Nah, das bogus. Cognition is as simple as a physical object’s computational power.
I’m being lazy here, admittedly but aliens, AI, and us will share that much in common.
The application of that power towards reasoning allows us to measure it.
The way a human mind plays chess is incredibly different from how a computer does. We use patterns and heuristics; they use brute calculating power. So ultimately it’s about the function, not the process. Either a cognitive system can solve a given problem or it can’t.
gypsyman,
Any impairment that is, as it so happens, not to be intelligence should be counted as decreasing intelligence because metacognition is a form of intelligence. If emotions get in the way it is a handicap that decreases intelligence the same way an oven mitt decreases your skills at Halo (a videogame). Lack of Self-awareness will lead to interactions with other people that decreases your chances to use your intelligence properly. Also I would say the reason self-awareness increases intelligence is because of the attention mechanism. Poor attention leads to poor intelligence. Self-awareness increases focus and improves attention. They are comingled. One always increases the other. That is why I say self-awareness is the source of intelligence, it is because of the attention mechanism.
My brother is not very self-aware and when he plays games with social options he cannot understand people enough to achieve the goal of the game. If playing games with social options is an IQ test then he has a lower psychological IQ than me. You cannot simply say that social skills is not a reflection of intelligence. Social skills is a mechanism just as any other IQ mechanism. It should be included on g measures. And self-awareness is a form of intelligence because socially aware people can achieve goals. Self-awareness is required for the mental manipulation of social dynamics. If you cannot understand social dynamics then your g loading must be low. Being good at academic tests does not mean you g loading is high. (g) includes everything so if you have autism obviously you cannot say you have a high g loading because you don’t understand social dynamics.
The inability to solve problems is an attention mechanism problem. Theory of mind requires reflection and self-awareness and metacognition. All of these are g loaded because all of them are mechanisms for solving problems.
Nah, you’ll end up drawing absurd conclusions that way.
Such as: A man with an IQ of 160 who’s engaged at a social event fails to talk to you and fulfill that goal is being “Inhibited” in his social intellgence because of preoccupation.
But clearly he doesn’t lack the ability to in a cognitive sense, he’s choosing not to. It might be that he’s predisposed to choose not not speak with you, and maybe for example he doesn’t like you, but that doesn’t change the fact that he has the cognitive power to do it.
>The way a human mind plays chess is incredibly different from how a computer does. We use patterns and heuristics; they use brute calculating power.
That’s just two different ways of using the same ability. Humans lack the same “Ability” in a very narrow sense.
>So ultimately it’s about the function, not the process. Either a cognitive system can solve a given problem or it can’t.
No, you’re confused now: It’s about both, the process being brute ability, the function being the use of that brute ability (Processing power in each case) in particular methods.
In the strictest sense: Intelligence IS raw power. What intelligence DOES is reason in a variety of methods(Or cognitively adapt).
We’ve got very powerful brains that are heavily compartmentalized such that our raw power is limited in each avenue that we’ve been evolutionarily selected to prioritize.
In the strictest sense: Intelligence IS raw power.
Power to do what?
An idiot savant may seem intelligent but most of the are completely oblivious to social dynamics. If an idiot savant has an IQ of 160 yet fails to understand people then it is not that they don’t want to understand, it is that they are incapable. The reason and Idiot savant with an IQ of 160 doesn’t want to talk to me may be because they don’t want to but it could all be because they are an idiot and don’t understand how the minds of other people works. Personal goals is not the same as problems that need solving. Idiot savants can solve some problems at beyond genius levels but the idiot part is definitely a lack in cognitive ability.
>people then it is not that they don’t want to understand, it is that they are incapable.
You’re confusing cognitive and psychological impediments.
Some are highly intelligent, and aren’t lacking cognitively in any regard but have highly dysfunctional personalities.
Don’t confuse the two.
>Power to do what?
Already explained that.
Cognitively Adapt is a good abbreviated definition.
A more complete one is the ability to collect and use data within an incentive structure.
So remind me again what we’re disagreeing about? A friend’s mother defined intelligence as the ability to synthesize information usefully. I thought that was the most succinct definition I’ve ever heard.
Mainly that it’s insufficient; you take a functional definition as being sufficient rather than simply necessary.
I don’t have any problem with your definition of “The ability to cognitively adapt” so long as ability is delineated from actual performance and cognitive is mentioned so as to delineate it away from other features, adapt is heavily misleading in its implications, but since we’re not dealing with implications but strictly succinct definitions it’s entirely legitimate.
In other words: I’m explaining “Ability” more fully as opposed to “Adaptation” as you do and I think you ought to also if only for purposes of clarity.
I like this definition.
The ability to plan for the future, a significant function of prefrontal regions of the cortex, may be key indeed. According to the best definition I have come across so far, put forward by MIT physicist Alex Wissner-Gross, intelligence is the ability to make decisions that maximize future freedom of action—that is, decisions that keep most doors open for the future. (Herculano-Houzel, 2016: 122-123)
He says it towards the end of the video.
I showed you that quotation from Herculano-Houzel last month and it does agree with your definition I believe. I can take to that definition, maybe I just don’t like your word choice.
Theory of mind is a way of using information about people.
Self-awareness is a way of using information about the self.
Even if they are both psychological aspects of a person they still require information processing.
“intelligence” is a word.
the meaning is the use.
use it however you like.
i clean my toilet with intelligence.
Nice to see you back Gypsy.
Nice to be back
jail?
How come peepee never talks about oprahs looks? Why is it always her intelligence. Many women would find that patronising.
Peepee thinks psychopathy is not following zions weirdo jim jones cult morality tules for the low ability rubes.
True or false?
Philosofool you’re a good psychologist but when it comes to me, you’re in over your head, like a dog trying to give humans marital advice. I am simply genetically superior to you in every way. I understand you but you can’t understand me. Stick to analyzing Afro
Thats nice peepee. Have a good siesta on sunday. My my i cant believe the problems with clocks these days. They sometmes make them to go backwards! Fruit has monosacchirides and disacharrides and often pesticides.
I was very happy with the dry cleaning yesterday. I believe there is an ‘app’ one can use to rate the performance of the cleaner. The cleaner is very slective about the items of clothing that wi be laundered. Any hint of imperfection in the material will be scaled over in handheld dye. Its important the clients get a ‘sheen’ to the items deposited. In this way sanctuary company and sons has consistently outperformed all other dry cleaners on the ‘app’ apraisal rating. Unfortunately the app is available only to the proprietor.
What did rushton say about jews peepee?
Would be interesting to see how far he got. Keeping in mind he lived in a pre internet age of none jew filtered information.
We never talked jews but he hated Gould & thought he was a fraud.
Greg Johnson claims rushton said immigration was a conscious genocidal policy per Kevin macdonald so he was possibly suspicious of Zion
Youre right. Its a pity we dont have rushton around today.
Rushton never touched Gould’s evolutionary arguments. And, in the interest of fairness, the Morton debate is not over.
Here’s Lewis et al 2011:
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071
Here is a critique of Lewis et al, defending Gould:
This article is a reexamination of the Morton and Gould controversy. It argues that most of Gould’s arguments against Morton are sound. Although Gould made some errors and overstated his case in a number of places, he provided prima facia evidence, as yet unrefuted, that Morton did indeed mismeasure his skulls in ways that conformed to 19th century racial biases. Gould’s critique of Morton ought to remain as an illustration of implicit bias in science.
Click to access remeasuring-man.pdf
We begin this paper with Lewis et al.’s re-measurements of the skulls in Morton’s collection. Their discussion of the remeasurement takes up a significant portion of their paper, and much, indeed most, of the media coverage focused on this aspect of their work. We argue that this re-measurement was completely irrelevant to an evaluation of Gould’s published analysis of Morton; the exercise was pointless, and there was no legitimate reason to feature the results of that work. The space Lewis et al. devote to their re-measurement of the skulls, as well as the media attention it garnered, form part of a larger pattern of a reframing of Gould’s criticisms of Morton that is, again, at best misleading.
Click to access KAPGOM.pdf
Gotta look at all sides, not just one you agree with.
Im beginning to suspect race really is autistic.
“Im beginning to suspect race really is autistic.”
How so? We have another armchair psychiatrist here? How come my primary care childhood doctor never found this out, yet some goy on a blog thinks he did?
The debate is not over. You shouldn’t just accept something because it is what your view is. Always look at all sides and all criticisms.
i’m so disappointed in afro. he’s just another black supremacist. he hates white people, unless they’re french. he worships jews. he has serious identity issues.
the point afro-tard is blacks left their bantustans and left the rest of africa for ZA, because their own countries were such shit holes.
then they say, “hey whitie, gimme everything here or you’s a raciss.” and the world believed them. despicable.
but the white exploitation of black labor was also despicable. so we see again how capitalism ruins everything.
de klerk splains it for black supremacist.
https://charlierose.com/videos/5916
i have this odd feeling that afro has hair like quest love.
When you look at anything through an ethical lense you’re in danger of radically misinterpreting actions.
Israel is protecting its interests by ensuring that its enemies in the region can’t gain leverage by having an ally that divides the Israeli landscape.
It’s sound strategically, the methods by which it achieves its goals are questionable – maybe they ought to take a tip from the hearts and minds campaign run by the British in Malaysia, but maybe they’re between a rock and a hard place.
As for commnuism/capitalism, human nature is predatory expect exploitation regardless of the supposed system being operated under.
Take off that raincoat.
israel has nukes. the arabs have lost every war. they’re safe.
no one in israel believes it’s safer as the result of its occupation of the west bank.
that’s invented.
put your clothes back on.
>israel has nukes. the arabs have lost every war. they’re safe.
Any leverage your enemies have over you is bad leverage.
Death by a thousand cuts.
Only when I’m done with your girl, slick.
d-bag-tard.
the motivation for the settlements is 1. religious 2. economic.
the white saffers didn’t have settlements in the bantustans.
look at lesotho, what the bantustans would have become. it’s a nation-state. 99.7% basotho.
Well if they’re profiting by it by any means it’s advantageous to them and why should they stop?
And moreover, comparing SA and Israel isn’t comparing like with like. Using my own knowledge of something more similar, the Rhodesian Bushwar, I’m aware that surrounding African nations are barely a threat to even a semi-modernized nation state, for example operation Eland ended with literally no allied deaths.
So you’d be exaggerating in the extreme by comparing African enemies to Arab ones.
Not even the same category of threat.
“the point afro-tard is blacks left their bantustans and left the rest of africa for ZA, because their own countries were such shit holes.”
African immigration to apartheid South Africa was in the vicinity of 0 per year. And the Bantustans were never meant to be economically viable.
“but the white exploitation of black labor was also despicable. so we see again how capitalism ruins everything.”
Blame it on capitalism, not racism ! LMAO #woke
how do you like my present afro?
think of santo when you use it.
more lies by jewfro.
all those protests you may have seen were in the “townships” not the bantustans. the townships were where blacks lived who’d left their bantustans for work.
if it hadn’t been for greedy white capitalists, separate development would have worked out and ZA would be a first world country today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantustan#Life_in_the_Bantustans
basically the story of ZA is analogous to mexicans voting to secede from the US once they have the majority in california, arizona, texas, and new mexico, thus reversing the result of the mexican american war.
and it’s a perfect analogy, because at the time of war hardly anyone lived in these states, hardly any mexicans, hardly any americans.
get it fro-tard?
“and it’s a perfect analogy, because at the time of war hardly anyone lived in these states, hardly any mexicans, hardly any americans.
get it fro-tard?”
Not at all, the blacks never wanted to separate from South Africa. How could have they done that ? They were the overwhelming majority everywhere except for some small disparate pockets of Afrikaner and Anglo settlement.
If the whites wanted a national homeland, the best they could have done is to declare the Western and Northern Cape provinces independant , Resettle all whites from Transvaal, Orange, Natal, Rhodesia, Kenya and Namibia in this region. Then encourage the immigration of Portuguese Angolans and Mozambicans as well as other Colonials from the rest of Africa like the French Algerians. And as usual, a few Italians, Greeks, Poles… would have reinforced their ranks.
With that population, they would have dealt with a minority of around 40% mostly Coloured non-whites and the Blacks would have been left alone in the Eastern half where they had established century-old kingdoms.
But there was too much gold in in Witwatersrand and the soil of Natal is so awesome…
talk to me when you’ve got an extra 30 IQ points.
there was no south africa for its indigenes fucktard.
xhosa, zulu, sutu, etc.
If the whites wanted a national homeland, the best they could have done is to declare the Western and Northern Cape provinces independant , Resettle all whites from Transvaal, Orange, Natal, Rhodesia, Kenya and Namibia in this region.
i agree. but the east was fairly dense with black homelands.
another mistake the whites made: the homelands weren’t contiguous.
in 1960 blacks weren’t part of the ZA economy. in 1990 it depended on them.
A more accurate map is this one
And no, Blacks were already part of the economy by the time of the Witwatersrand gold rush in the 19th century. That’s when the first socio-racial clashes happened.
yes. the “more land” might’ve been just leaving the east to the blacks.
(ignoring how east ZA became so black.)
as you’ve said afro…
“black” is not a nation or a culture. so true. sad!
Uh, do I need to post pics from the Boer war ??
afro has sploded his-self on his own petard.
sad!
85% of the homelands’ income came from direct transfer payments from Pretoria.
racism?
It means nothing. What amount do these 85% represent in absolute and per capita terms ? How is it different from the amount spent on whites ? What share of the national budget is it ?
It’s very easy to reach these 85% when you you spend them of noncontinuous rural teritories without cities and barely arable land.
You don’t seem very inspired tonight Mugabe.
seems like the exact opposite of racism to me.
afro’s head is thicker than his fiancee. sad!
does 85% of nigeria’s income come from the uk?
What do you mean by income ? Government budget or GDP ?
It would be impossible that 85% of Nigeria’s income come from the UK since Nigeria is Africa’s largest economy. But the Bantustans were puppet states, with no no workforce, no viable economic prospects. They were like indian reservations. Is there a country that ever recognized a Bantustan apart from SA ?
and his fiancee is THICK! a lot like deal with it.
Thick girls are the shit. Deal would be fine for me if she was about 6 inches taller.
Lol Afro, the man I’m seeing is 6 feet tall and he doesn’t mind my height. Besides, I’m practically always in heels.
I’m practically always in heels.
how did you ever get into an elite law school?
affirmative action.
heels, tanner, painted eyebrows…
jesus christ!
at least snooki didn’t shave her eyebrows completely.
squaw-tch has something to prove. i have an idea what that is, but it’s racisss.
Except I look way better, am smarter, and not white trash.
Milo though the age of consent laws were about right, but he simply brought up the uncomfortable yet utterly rational possibilitiy that there are exceptions.
In fact, I’ve always gone further than he did, and state outright that 13 was old enough throughout most of human history. Attraction to post-pubescent teenagers is not pedophilia, and if it were, then we are all descended from “pedophiles.”
Those who believe the age of consent is non-negotiable are simply following another dogma of laughably recent vintage, wherein all sexual contact that occurs below certain arbitrarily chosen ages (which vary form region to region and historical period to historical period) is automatically traumatic and unspeakably heinous.
There are U.S. states where peope as young as 13-16 can get married, and even more still where there is no minimum age of marriage, pending parental and judicial review! All this codified in the “traditional” parts of rural America and beyond, that so many conservatives wax fantastical about.
Milo simply had the balls to say what people like Camille Paglia have pointed out for decades, and only now is he being ripped to shreds after the fact for something he said a while ago.
He is allowed to be as ambivalent as he wants to about the sexual experiences he had, to and take whatever position he wishes about his agency in them. I know many who process events that happened to them which many would decidedly consider “rape” by telling dark, ‘sick’ jokes about it.
Those who want to destroy Milo’s momentum are simply playing on the emotionality and hysteria of people who fail to see the inconsistencies of their own worldview, and the totalitarian, liberty-depriving implications of the meddling they advocate in adolescent sexuality.
I’ve never understood this idea that 13 years are old enough to make adult decisions. The human mind doesn’t finish developing until 25.
This post sucks.
PP, are you clickbaiting with celebrity posts ?
Of course he is. This isn’t an IQ blog. It’s a celebrity diet rag with IQ sprinkled in. His last 10 posts have been lackluster.
PP please do some real research and provide references to scientific studies that back your claims.
Yeah he’s been so uninspired that he looked like he was begging for trolling. And this way of adding IQ to everything is retarded. Now we have theory of mind IQ after artistic IQ. What’s next ? Sex IQ ? Fashion IQ ? Cooking IQ ? Pooping IQ ? Oprahood IQ ?
This is really not serious.
“sex IQ”
This is where the “genetically inferior muscular people that branched off the evolutionary tree earlier” is superior to muh highly evolved nerds. Nerds don’t have sex till a late age.
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php
“cooking IQ”
I have the highest cooking IQ here.
“artistic IQ”
I’d put that with spatial ability.
“Oprahood IQ”
PP has the highest here (literally useless knowledge).
“fashion IQ”
I await this post from him.
You can’t just add “IQ” to everything and expect it to explain something.
Seems this blog has become TMZ with celebrity click bait titles.
how many years in prison for trolling in france jewfro?
““cooking IQ”
I have the highest cooking IQ here.”
Peepee beats you on the hot chocolate subtest though.
“Seems this blog has become TMZ with celebrity click bait titles.”
Yep, peepee should literally estimate the IQ of every TMZ queen, it would be the ultimate clickbait.
“IQ” is a huge clickbait term too jewfro.
this is why AAPL puts “i” in front of everything.
As a black man, i believe jason has raised a very important issue about the regular commenter race supremacist and his recurring ranting about blacks and jews. People have been scared to say anything for so long as pumpkin moderates anything that isnt in lkne with his peraonal racist beliefs. I urge everyone to support us in calling for race to be banned inmediately as we will not tolerate hatred on this forum.
LOL. To quote Trump, I’m the least racist person there is.
Laughing us out of the building wont shake our resolve mr pumpkin. We will not fade into the night. The people at selma and the zebra murderers demonstrated the great arc of history post 1965 in english speaking countries bends towards zion. Never forget that next time you sneer at us from your cotton plantation in canada.
Is slavery still legal up there?
comic genius ^^^.
PS I also feel deal needs to be banned for rampant unhinged misandry and sexism.
she also hates asians.
before she came out as a transgendered native american woman, she said…
“asians are evil.”
Im getting really annoyed with ny gay coworkers face and him constantly checking me out. I want to beat him with his phone. Aaaaargrgrdiy263ýj
This asian guy is more alpha then all of you:
proof blacks are social geniuses:
I don’t mean anything racist but that Asian rap stuff was really embarrassing. Far East Movement managed to be kinda cool, keeping it very mainstream but what I saw above made me sick lol.
All trap is cringy, that’s what makes it humorous and fun, you learn to roll with it and just wild out.
Secondly I actually found this rap on facebook it was a video of a bunch of black trap rappers reacting to it. Surprisingly, they all found it dope as hell.
Honestly as far as asians rapping this is definitely better than what I usually see.
How can you not see this dude is a genius. He is wearing a fannypack, a polo and khaki shorts, all while trap rapping in a voice deeper than most black rappers.
He is being ironic and artistic. Essentially lil dicky but more parodic.
My sound is turned off, my girl and I are doing our homework. The video was just a visual aggression, can’t judge the music though.
“My sound is turned off, my girl and I are doing our homework.”
Homework? How old are you?
“The video was just a visual aggression”
Lmao. You are so white XD no offense.
I’m doing lawyer homework lol.
Lol, what sounds so white ? The “just a visual aggression” stuff ? It was in reaction to the Asian video, the second one I did not watch yet.
“The “just a visual aggression” stuff”
Yes lol
“It was in reaction to the Asian video, the second one I did not watch yet.”
Oh, well the second video is a “visual assault” as well, both are good musically but the jew does it better(not surprisingly).
Hitler would have Holocausted the cash me out girl. No way she has an IQ above 70.
You do realize the cash me out girl is white, right? I though she was black at first myself..
“You do realize the cash me out girl is white, right? I though she was black at first myself..”
Yeah, nah I knew she was white right off the bat, she looks white and only a white girl would sound that cringy talking like that.
i was talking about the dude who made the song using her and Dr. Phil’s vocals:
50 years ago that bitch would’ve been beat down in the streets but now she’s being used as props in rapper’s videos. This generation is easily the most intelligent, remember when the russian ambassador was killed? Yeah instead of WW3 happening we had people making hilarious memes about it.
That girl’s instagram is just #savage
Half Steve Sailer’s followership LMAO.
Yeah Phil, the racial war is coming, sure dude.
https://www.instagram.com/bhadbhabie/
Instagram followers mean nothing. Steve Sailer has MILLIONS of readers a year.
Instagram pics and vids have much more viewers than your follower count. Like if you go to the cash me outside girl’s instagram you’ll see some videos with about 5 million views.
Hundreds of thousands of people read my blog in 2016 alone
That’s equivalent to a major city
And the average IQ of my readers is 125 vs 90 on Instagram
He had 10,000,000 page views last year.
As a blogger, you know that the number of pageviews or the number of unique visitors aren’t relevant metrics. Most people click links and exit almost immediately, or they open many tabs tabs and actually only browse only a few where they find information, giving the impression that they’ve been reading the others whereas they ignore them and close them when they think they’ve opened too many tabs.
The relevant metrics are page viewed per visitor, and the number of clicks on links and media content within your blog.
It is pointless to argue over the hotness of HBD. It is a marginal web phenomenon, it’s confidential in the mainstream and there is no significant subculture that is associated with it, not even the alt-right.
People, especially young people, are more captivated by random people being entertaining or showing off on twitter and instagram than by creepy racist theories. I mean, if you look at people, even in the most prestigious colleges, what they care about most of the day is very basic. Most people aren’t questioning life or society like some do here and it’s not an IQ thing in my opinion, it’s just about feelings and priorities in life.
As for the IQ of your readership, this is more than speculative. Because racist people are below average in IQ, the research terms on Robert Lindsay were hilariously ignorant I remember. I don’t know about yours peepee but honestly, what would an actual researcher find useful on your blog ? Actually, it’s pretty obvious that you are not targeting an intelligent readership. That’s why you have us lol.
Racists have low IQs, but people who are interested in IQ, evolution & statistics tend to be quite bright, and on average my readers have Harvard intellects.
I’m not saying i deserve such a smart readership, but i seem to have lucked into one.
Sailer also has very important people read his posts. I notice some top level propgandists use his phrases. They are not allowed to say it though….
Id hazard bannon definitely reads sailer. And trump must be at least aware of his concepts.
“He had 10,000,000 page views last year. ”
paleeeese. you have got to be kidding me.
Sailers unz blog gets 32.3k unique visitors per month .
lets assume that 85% of that 32.3k visits every day then thats
27.5k * 365 = 10 million visits per year.
the alt-right, kosher-right , HBD-right are all hype and not much more.
The most hyped breitbart only gets 2.9 million UVs , while the corporate leftist Huffingtonpost gets a huge 41.2 million UVs
Depending on who the dems pick, trump is going to get crushed in 4 years time.
Which is scary because the left is going to think that they have a mandate to end the white man.
“Actually, it’s pretty obvious that you are not targeting an intelligent readership”
Just look at his last ten posts. It reads more like TMZ than an IQ blog.
a haitian orphan adopted by rich frenchies calling me “son”.
afro is not who he says he is.
the last guy who called me “son” was a 6’5″ puerto rican with an irregular mole.
Lol, I see it went deep under your skin ! “Son” is the synonym of dude that I use to express scorn. And scorn is what your recent nonsense deserves.
more lies. or just bad english.
“son” appended to a statement…in english…means…
“i am your superior. you are an idiot.”
““i am your superior. you are an idiot.””
scorn
skɔːn/
noun
1.
a feeling and expression of contempt or disdain for someone or something.
“I do not wish to become the object of scorn”
synonyms: contempt, derision, contemptuousness, disdain, derisiveness, scornfulness, mockery, sneering, scoffing;
“son” != “scorn”.
is this jerry lewis stuff?
You don’t get it Mugabe. I call you son as a scornful way to say “dude”.
with an irregular mole!
http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/1169254_796537543809885_629392349_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTIwNzYzMjEyMzQzNjEzNjI2OA%3D%3D.2
pure awesomeness.
Notice the way the jews cant stand to quote his rant. If he had ranted against blacks they would have sourced quotes.
But a nto semitism cannot. Not because brainwashed goys would buy into it. But because jews know its true and project people will buy into it because ts true. The beurotic wiring means they cant sit with the risk.
http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e15/10838814_331214933746091_1162023478_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=ODcwMzcyNzI4Nzk1MTM2NzMy.2
just plain sad!
In 2014, the gonorrhea rate among American Indians/Alaska Natives was 159.4 cases per 100,000 population, which was 4.2 times the rate among whites…
In 2014, the chlamydia rate among American Indians/Alaska Natives was…3.7 times the rate among whites.
The 2014 rate of P&S syphilis for American Indians/Alaska Natives was 2.2 times the rate for whites. This disparity was larger for American Indian/Alaska Native women (9.6 times the rate among white women)…
The natives cant hold their drink so i imagine that the women get into a lot of situations that they wouldn’t if they were sober.
might be. squaw-tch has exemplified this herself.
paul theroux mentions in Happy Isles that white australians drink MORE than abos, but the abos get in trouble when they drink. i mentioned this on cockring’s blog and the response was…
there are two issues. 1. drinking too much absolutely 2. drinking too much relatively…some can hold it…others can’t.
squaw-tch’s typing is worse than pill’s when she’s got a little jager in her.
sad!
http://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/56957-boost-iq-stack/
That is the link to a forum we’re men do nytrpoic drugs to boost their IQ. This man used heavy nutropics and mental cognition training games for 2 weeks to boost his IQ by 10 points. The boost was only temporary, after he got off he slowly went back to base line.
I’ve bought his “program” before and I can say it does work, it’s about $250 worth of pills and supplements and about 30-40 pills a day but it works. Only reason I stopped was because at the time I couldn’t afford to spend $250 per month on it.
Now I can and I’m starting back on it today.
Results for anyone that is curious are as follows.
Increased “mental vision”: able to see with your minds eye in incredible almost super human clarity.
No brain fog or brain hurting headaches from concentration ( no matter how difficult the task)
No mental fatigue from boring day in and day out grinds.
Thoughts are extraordinarily more organized and come quicker.
Faster reflexes and a higher awareness of surroundings.
Basic results
Dude, I’ve done every nootropic there is by now. They don’t increase your IQ 10 points. Don’t buy into propaganda.
Not gonna lie though, Adderall does make me feel amazing for about a week or so. I can concentrate and get stuff done I normally don’t like doing.
Nootropics are great for cognition. You should get educated on the effects of supplementation on the body. I used to think it was stupid but not anymore. They are pretty amazing.
Of course buying anyone’s stack is retarded. If you know what to look for you can get cheap high quality supplements.
If u take 30-40 different pills a day your IQ will boost js
Give me the list of supplements and I’ll find high quality and cheap supplements for you. I know what to look for (specific education on supplements). Let me know the list.
Of course, only with doctors supervision, etc. I can get in trouble without disclaimers as I don’t know your history.
People should be lifting and taking all of those supps anyway!
Too long, didn’t read. Take supplements, get benefits, stop taking them, then they go away!! I am SHOCKED!!!
Click the fucking link and you get the list what is wrong with you today?
afro would make a huge mistake in introducing me to his parents and fiancee.
1. i’d be wearing l l bean
2. i would REEK of gin.
3. i would immediately start an affair with afro’s mother. she’s french. easy peasy.
4. his fiancee would approach me, but i would reject her. i would mistake her for a dude.
just plain sad!
“1. i’d be wearing l l bean”
As a decent host, I’d gladly give a nice tailored Italian suit to a guest who comes directly from California. I think I’d book a dentist too and give you an update in good manners.
“2. i would REEK of gin.”
Let’s say it’s big in Japan. Which in France is a way of making an outlandish behavior pass for hype.
“3. i would immediately start an affair with afro’s mother. she’s french. easy peasy.”
Wow, slow down son… I’d only introduce you to my mother to convince her to do something charitable about alcoholism. The rest of your time would be spent with my father, he’s a human rights specialist, you’d enjoy and he would take you to an American military graveyard, there are many of them in Normandy.
“4. his fiancee would approach me, but i would reject her. i would mistake her for a dude.”
Lol, first my girl would never approach you, even if I convinced you to moisturize to hit the gym and to go regularly to the dentist. Secondly, If you saw my girl, you’d be amazed and she’d stay on your mind forever.
Speaking of Italian suits, do you think it’s tolerable that your idol looks like shit in Brioni ?
Look at that mess:
I think I’m catching convulsions. Even $20K on his ass can’t make him look vaguely elegant.
-Enormous Tacky ties.
-Where in the world do people keep their jacket open when standing up ?
-His jacket’s sleeves are way too long.
-No watch !!?!?!?!?!
-Nothing in the suit seems to fit his size, it’s too big.
Fashion IQ: 43.
Sad!
Plain sad!
Really really sad!
“Fashion IQ: 43.”
Which subtest did he do the worst on? The jacket style subtest?
“Which subtest did he do the worst on? The jacket style subtest?”
Yep, he totally sucked at the jacket subtest. The tie subset was an epic fail too.
The only possible environmental explanations is that there was a power shortage so he couldn’t turn on the lights and see what he was putting on, nor could he find his watch.
Otherwise, it’s has to be 100% genetic. But I don’t know if it’s familial or organic.
afro’s mom and fiancee jack off to the donald.
sad!
http://chimpmania.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20331&d=1355205974&thumb=1
i also have a t-shirt for afro.
that’s hendrik verwoerd btw.
a frenchman giving lessons on manners? ha, ha, ha…
Yesterday, French actor Gerard Depardieu got drunk on a flight and stood and peed on the cabin floor. A spokesperson for Air France said it was the fourth rudest thing someone did on that flight.
Gawd, you would totally set everybody on flabbergast with such inelegant generalizations. Your manners are so gross that it’s beyond the realm of my competences.
Check that: the international school of etiquette, where the French teach foreign savages how to behave appropriately in a civilized country:
http://eng.inter-etiquette.com/ise
Meanwhile, Condé Nast has an etiquette 101 course for you.
http://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2007-10-16/etiquette-101-france
conde nast and an etiquette school run by an english woman.
sad!
tell us who you really are afro. the afrosapiens character is ridiculously in-authentic.
i’d wear your italian suit, but with only a t-shirt underneath, Miami Vice style.
my t-shirt would be tres fashionable.
You can’t write “tres” you need to write “très” pronounced as “treah”, “tres” would be impossible to say, it would be something like “tr”.
Improve your French or you won’t be able to write a letter of thanks in French, which would be extremely uncouth.
i agree. writing a letter of thanks in french would be tres uncouth.
Someone’s a closet pedophile.
Deal
idiot!
elmo = afro.
i don’t want french teeth afro.
Lol ! Ribéry is a white trash from the North of France, his dental IQ is in the 40s. As a Professor in Dentometrics at Université Colgate de Nantes (Phd. mention #SmileOnFleek), I have the ability to estimate people’s IQ from their teeth.
Look,
Barack Obama: IQ125
Vladimir Putin: IQ95
Donald Trump: IQ170, la crème de la crème, the Mar$ha of teeth
Oprah: IQ115, another theory claims that her success is due to her extremely big brain, but dentometricians have discovered that her intelligence was in the normal range and that she’s just an exploitive opportunist.
Deal with Snooki!: now IQ130 up from IQ70 before brain surgery
Kim Kardashian: IQ150, in line with her waist to hips ratio
Justin Bieber: IQ105
Paul Pogba: IQ200 The ultimate GOAT
Rihanna: IQ135
Marine Le Pen: IQ80
As peepee proposed me to guest post, you’ll show you my dental IQ estimation formula as well as the evolutionary implications of the teeth-intelligence correlation. For the time being, the only thing I can tell you as a specialist is that having good teeth is the most important thing in life. Beyond education or SES. Believe me, that’s what my school mentor told me.
my brother and i had no orthodonture. we didn’t need it. rare among the kids in our town.
teeth that look like dentures are UN-attractive…just like everything fake.
are those even trump’s teeth?
but it is interesting how people who can afford perfect teeth often have bad teeth…like depardieu or pierce brosnan.
i’ve had two cavities. but most cavities don’t exists…in america…it’s just greedy dentists. i’ve had the huge advantage of “conservative” dentists since i was in middle school.
i wouldn’t trust a dentist as far as i could throw him.
They will do whatever you let them get away with.
at 17 one dentist tried to convince me to get dentures!
at 14 one showed me shiny ” silver” teeth and tried to convince me that my friends would think they were cool.
I said no to all of them . In fact, i didn’t even have braces.
I blame the insurance system. So long as the patient isn’t directly paying you will
always get
1. Price inflation
2. unnecessary procedures.
Public healthcare is the only sane thing to do but it will never happen because of ” vibrancy”
…most cavities don’t exist
s…two problems with private payer are…
almost total in-elasticity of demand.
doctors (and dentists) have such marketing power, such authority, they can convince an eskimo to buy ice.
the big problem with socializing medicine in america is…
americans are paying for innovation and discovery for the whole world.
ideal solution is at least double funding for research + single payer.
I hardly even brush my teeth and I’ve never had a cavity in my life.
Hi everyone. After a few days as a black man the following has happened
1. I am a director of the board.
2. I receive allowances and stipenda to bring vibrancy and diversity to whites whose civilisation absolutely would have crumbled without it.
3. I notice how everyone talks to me slowly or about thrasy topics like women and drugs in casual convos. Which is cool!
4. I notice some people looking warily at me as if im dangerous or something. Not true. Only if they dont give me what i want when i say “gimme dat”.
5. The jew from the local newspaper really loves my musings on african american views on european politics. He liked my suggestion that whites are racist while he rubbed his hands together.
6. The local centre pretend left official asked me to run for an electoral seat. As all countries need diversity in their decision makers to reflect the concerns of the third world, i agreed. He said i could be the next obama as lkng as ai shut my mouth and let brainwashed low t cucks project their high empathy desires onto me. I said stop using so many long words like that and gimme drugs.
7. I got my new black girlfried robandasha pregnant. I expect ill throw her off the pier time we go out to get fried chicken.
8. I realise police are racist abd now understand that police are the most vile human beings on the plant. Burglars, rioters, drug dealers, gangs and jew pushed handicapped rappers are the best in my new culture.
9. I notice the way the jew chairma n keeps speaki g really softly and soothingly to me almost hypnotically. I gelt it was weird when he kept saying weird words to me. I said – this aint business bro. He threw up his arms and said – you know our mind control tricks dont work on blacks. I was a proud man.
10. Im writing a book called ‘the invisble trans racial man’. The swedes say they havent even read it but want to give me the nobel lit prize for raising conciousness on trans racial issues. They are really intelligent very sexually viable individuals.
why does the uk dislike Romanians so much ?
When i went to college a lot of the top guys in my class were Romanians.
some of them do have a yellowish hue to their skin but usually those are the smartest ones.
Here is a pic of Ciprian Manolescu
is it an due to the economic competition between the working class english and the romanians?
“is it an due to the economic competition between the working class english and the romanians?”
Most likely. People don’t talk about this but the biggest group of immigrants in the UK are the Polish. Hmmm… And they’re economic migrants as well… Hmmm….
its seems that the english have a major problem with polish immigration.
I remember seeing a video of a british program called “Question Time” where a woman in a place called Boston,UK was claiming that eastern europeans get drunk and sleep on the streets.
eastern european seems to be a term of abuse in the UK , which is amazing because slavic women are of a very high caliber in the looks department.
I once had a serious relationship with a pole that moved to the US. She was a Knockout but it ended because i wanted to leave the US and she was a grad student.
In the last year i have dated 2 Czechs, 1 Hungarian, 1 Latvian and 3 Russians.
The problem with those women is that you get used to their looks after 20 minutes and then you try to have a real conversation and nothing clicks.
I’m currently dating a German who calls Merkel a ” pedigree Marxist” 🙂
I think she’s a keeper.
James Thompson—Group IQ doesn’t exist. Smart groups are (simply) groups of smart people.
http://www.unz.com/jthompson/group-iq-doesnt-exist/
One of the more interesting questions in hbd is why the jews have an equal proponderence of autists and schiz personality types.
The stereotypical neurotic jews – precursor to paranoid type.
And aspergers zuckerberg, the ceo of my org and wittgenstein.
I notice einsteins son had schizophrenia. Many people say einstein was a very creative guy. He did play violin i recall to a very high level.
Evolution wise, its ofteb the case a centralised state is needed to force rule following o the serfs. In turn socially harmless rule followers procreate in monogamous social systems.
I would bet the ashkenazi suffer far more from autism if thats the theory.
And sephardic and ethiopian jews are far more schizophrenic.
The ability create so many religions cults and make belief ideologies is more a gamma trait than schiz i reckon. The gamma male bends reality in his mind to make up for the fact he is a loser and can notice it. Unlike the omega who accepts his station and wakes up everyday looking for a cheap thrill – chicken nuggets, video game or a dash of colour in their prufrockian lives of timidity.
Human beings are a very interesting phenomena.
Simon Baron-Cohen thinks Einstein was autistic. He didn’t learn to speak until a late age. His son’s schizophrenia proves little because in those days, autism was considered schizophrenia and even today the two traits show a genetic link.
Id have to hear an interview with him. Believe it or not ive never heard him speak.
What ill be looking for is clipped speech or social innocence.
My conjecture is that cluster c personalitues are precursor s to cluster a.
I think ocd and avoidant personality are on the spectrum.
They are not mutually exclusive as psychologists have found.
I think psychopathy and bpd/depressives are not on the spectrum.
It would take a lot more typing, but those two are essentially not modes of cognition but emotion.
If you solve the limbic puzzle you get more clarity.
HBD and KFC, by my new co-author Scott Jameson.
SAT and KFC ** whoops.
The SAT’s name change story is a classic case of “Political Correctness,” and is mirrored by KFC’s story of adapting to new nutritional standards. For those out of the loop: after the public realized how unhealthy fried foods are, Kentucky Fried Chicken changed its name to KFC. The point was to make the unhealthy nature of the food one conceptual extrapolation away from the name itself, in hopes that the public would not bother to recall what the “F” stood for.
SAT originally stood for “Scholastic Aptitude Test.” It was (and is) a test to determine how apt you are for scholarly endeavors. Put bluntly, it’s a somewhat sloppy IQ test oriented towards scholarly settings in particular. Of course, that name was too accurate, so it fell out of favor. The public does not want to live in a world wherein poor students are less apt than rich students and Black students are less apt than White students, and so the Scholastic Aptitude Test became the Scholastic Assessment Test. In order to be offended by that, you have to remember that what’s being assessed is aptitude and that nothing has changed. Like “KFC,” it was one conceptual extrapolation away from the reality at hand. Most people were probably too harebrained to see through that.
OK, I have not read the comment but I saw KFC. I’m already starting to be drunk. I’m at the airport and the plane is late. Fraaaance OMG. Anyway I say it highkey KFC’s chizza is a fucking scam. And a racist one, the one they sold me had the shape of Africa. But there are worse things in life… But if I had nothing else to do I would totally sue those fascist assholes.
Good evening aèd good night my weird friends from another plannette de ouf
you eat fast food afro?
french manners again. sad!
Your new co-author is not off to a good start. He thought Lindsay and I misunderstood heritability, when I actually know more about the math of heritability than him or anyone he knows. I was making a distinction between PRIMARY heritability and SECONDARY heritability.
It’s like we’re never taking off … why are us romans so roman .. anyway let’s rock. my freak pal is already losing all sense of honor in the hall. couldn’t be a twitter story but it had to be said out loud. monaco can’t wait icf somwan is watching pipi’s blog
Perfect song for you Afro:
Cute song, but I don’t like most modern country. Too poppy.
It would totally be my jam if I were into country music. Planes are the greatest place to get drunk: there is nothing else to do but drinking, you can’t really harm yourself, drinks are free, you can trip on the sight from the windows, you can’t get kicked out, rumor has it that there is always a doctor among passengers and border controls, especially US ones are the ultimate remedy for hangover. The only problem is when you buy tickets separately, your friends are scattered throughout the cabin and you’re literally drinking over people’s heads.
And Nice airport is really mad sick
This weekend’s soundtrack was more like:
Just to get blue balls.
I will probably come across as extremely trashy but I can’t hold back the radical pride I get from this weekend’s main exploit.
Savage highway racing from coast to coast: Monaco-Nantes
https://www.google.fr/maps/dir/Monaco/Nantes/@45.3292212,0.692452,7z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x12cdc26f7b3f8531:0x74f7784c3ac49cfc!2m2!1d7.4246158!2d43.7384176!1m5!1m1!1s0x4805ee81f0a8aead:0x40d37521e0ded30!2m2!1d-1.553621!2d47.218371
Here’s the podium:
1- Porsche 911, the birthday boy, average speed: 143km/h
2- Maserati Granturismo, average speed: 139km/h
3- Aston Martin V8 Vantage, myself, average speed: 137km/h
4- Mercedes-AMG GT, average speed: 133km/h
5- Audi R8, average speed: 129km/h
Some dudes joined the race as well, one between Montpelier and Bordeaux, another between Toulouse and Nantes but I can’t include their speed because they didn’t do the full race.
I sucked at this race. Last weekend I did 148km/h average speed with a Jaguar F-Type between Venice and Milan, my girl had a Lexus LFA, and she scored 141km/h. I totally smoked her in Brescia. I watched her on skype, going like:
She was sooo lit.
Social genius:
Car rental companies usually give us 30% off when we make our races go social and copiously hashtag their name and wear their sticker on periscope, I thought last weekend’s Kim and Kanye going fast and furious was the best buzz we could have done but today was beyond anything imaginable. Periscope went mad, we got our rentals completely refunded. Received much love from Russia, commenters gave amazing challenges, every single city on the journey was properly repped, lame drivers were correctly dabbed, some epic skype roadraging was had… Pure dope.
Soundtrack:
Trashy squad goals ? Check.
my theory about afro.
he lives in the projects outside paris. he drives a bicycle.
listen from 15 seconds to 26 seconds.
he’s obviously gay. Even the lady reporter is bewildered at the extent of his gayness.
look at her face.
Everything he says is true but the average joe will be repelled by a message that is being pushed by a gay.
If i wanted to kill the alt-right i would promote gay alt-righters.
by doing that you prevent both the left and the right from supporting it.
the left reject them for “racism” and the right reject them as the faggot brigade.
his estranged wife isn’t a looker, but she is curvaceous. maybe the russians set it up. Nina Kouprianova.
tranny if ever i saw one .
tranny looking, but spencer does have 1 child by her.
he has custody. of the girl.
In what world would a ” whites supremacist” get custody of a girl?
obviously the Ruskys know that he is gay and that he is pro-Russia so they helped him find a cover.
They gave him a tranny to play with and then arranged for the surrogacy to happen and now that he has a kid he no longer needs the tranny because he now has solid evidence for his straightness.
There is no way that a real woman would give up custody of a girl, or that a Court would give custody to a ” white supremacist”
Its just illogical to believe such an improbable story.
For me personally , the strangest things about Spencer are :
1, He looks extremely like me
2. His mother has the exact same surname as my mother.
Maybe its a WASP Doppelganger effect .
That’s not a tranny. Thats ridiculous. You’re conspiracy theories are pretty lurid.
As for him being gay…
My own 2c is that a lot of young american men speak like that. We often think they’re gay here.
But yeah its possible he is.
” That’s not a tranny. ”
Obviously its a tranny.
You’re conspiracy theories are pretty lurid
can you explain why the official story is so unbelievable ?
do you really believe that a woman would give up custody of her daughter?
do you really believe that a single court in the land would give custody of a girl to a ” white supremacist” ?
What many people call a crazy conspiracy theory is actually sound logical deduction
He is definitely gay.
Too bad as he is hot.
steve shoe’s latest post is great. the alt-right-er is smarter than the princeton PhD. really!
but he has a jewish wife and looks kinda jewy himself.
why would a jewish woman marry a jew hater?
because he’s not really a jew hater?
maybe. not necessarily.
mike enoch = mike peinovich
He is a jew and his wife is a jew.
i smelt a rat even before he was doxed
1. he kept saying that the iraq war was for oil
2. He is obsessed with muslims in a non-immigration way.
real WNs like Duke dont give a damn about what those people do in their own countries.
3. He was desperate to deny israeli involvement in 9/11 when even fox alluded to it in 2001.
all 4 parts in one video. Fox never aired this again.
many suspect that people at the FBI were pissed off so they got Fox to do this
4 part story,
oh and PP cut this moderation nonsense. This is not kindergarten.
if you’re scared of Phil’s real talk then set up a word filter for naughty words/phrases.
if he himself were a jew…
it’d just be confirmation that the most vulgar “anti-semitism” is factually correct.
and that…
the jews know their position is in-defensible.
hymie is what gives the alt-right a bad name.
sad!!!
i am not a member of any alt-right.
I personally don’t believe there will be any change in the US without a race war.
I dont just talk the talk i walk the walk.
I left the US and will not move back until the blacks get Atlanta, Baltimore, Detroit etc and the hispanics get San Antonio, Miami etc and Whites get the other 90% .
When the partition of the US happens then i’ll return.
Until then i’m going to be here with a bevy of european women.
i’ll let you alt-righters fight it out to see which gay or jew is going to lead you .
teeth and IQ:
among the orthognathic the wisdom teeth are a huge problem.
mine are perfect.
why?
even though i’m at the extreme, even among whites, for orthognathism, the public school look…
i have a big head. there was plenty of room.
in this way…wisdom teeth, head size, brain size, IQ…there should be some faint correlation between happy wisdom teeth and IQ among europeans at least.
Agenesis of wisdom teeth differs by population, ranging from practically zero in Tasmanian Aborigines to nearly 100% in indigenous Mexicans.[2] The difference is related to the PAX9 gene (and perhaps other genes)…
Less than 2% of adults age 65 years or older maintain the teeth without cavities or periodontal disease and 13% maintain unimpacted wisdom teeth without cavities or periodontal disease…
in support of hymie’s immigrant ass…
the one guy i’ve met who remarked on his wisdom teeths’ utility was a big headed romanian…chemistry PhD candidate when i met him. he went to UIUC…another example of a top 10 chemistry department at a NOT top 10 uni.
my brother has a smaller head and his wisdom teeth are a problem.
“in support of hymie’s immigrant ass… ”
if you’re referring to where i am now then i don’t think the nationalists here would consider me an immigrant.
” my brother has a smaller head and his wisdom teeth are a problem.”
speaking of your brother, did he get into a top college?
if he did then it wasn’t biased admissions it was you.
but if he didn’t then maybe it runs in the family.
who knows.
runs in the family?
dad harvard. grand-dad princeton…and stonyhurst. etc. etc. on my dad’s size.
the family bid-ness was started in the late 18th c. closest thing to royatly was “lady in waiting” to the empress of brazil afaik. but vanity press family history in german if you’re interested. Geschichte der Familie…
but two of my mom’s cousins became profs. one in romance languages, the other in fluid dynamics. the latter is in Who’s Who, turned down stanford professorship.
funny thing is those two cousins have a maltese name, but the smarts came from the spanish side. and by “spanish” i mean…from spain. blue eyes, blonde hair. there’s a genealogy but i haven’t asked the relatives for it.
great point…those spanish ancestors have been in what is today the US since ponce de leon.
i agree with the super jewy looking mike enoch…rights should depend on how american one’s ancestry is. this rule puts most blacks at the top. they’re MORE american than most whites.
i would make such a better interview for the CUNY prof. he sounds super jewy, but maybe he’s not jewish. idk.
or rather …blond
e… both cousins were dudes.so the answer is no he didn’t.
with regards to your family background, i’ll see your spanish-irish family and raise you
Dads side = Jamestown
Moms side = Dutch New York
old stock
if so i agree with you.
rights should be proportionate to how american one’s ancestrors are.
just like how swedish or how russian…in sweden and russia.
if by some objective calculation hymie’s ancestors are more american he should be given extra points.
i agree.
the exact opposite of what UCB does.
my most recent immigrant ancestor is from liverpool. he arrived in the late 19th c. and he was NOT an economic refugee. a captain in the merchant marine and shipwight.
note…
pill is pro jew until he sees no buyers.
hymie is pro american uni admissions until he sees they contradict him.
i suggest peepee ban all MOSSAD commenters.
“if you’re referring to where i am now then i don’t think the nationalists here would consider me an immigrant.”
Doesn’t matter. You’re still an immigrant.
peepee did it!
14 years from now peepee will be “in her 30s”.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/24/14715774/milo-yiannopoulos-cpac-pedophile-video-canada
OMG! peepee’s name is “julia”?
sch-uh-wing!
lady julia flyte.
julia from 1984.
julia-n kaye for afro.
share the wine…call me!
“agenisis” i assume means no wisdom teeth ever develop.
the native tasmanians had small heads but also had prognathism out the wazoo. (the native tasmanians are “extinct”. there are still some mixed people though.)
the native mexicans have small heads too but also have a long history of agriculture.
as RR has said, soft food make big teeth irrelevant. tooth size is, in fact, strongly correlated with how long a people has practiced agriculture. so egyptians and iraqis tend to have small teeth. s w irish have big teeth.
or that’s what i remember from my one uni course on hbd. i think it was titled “human variation”, a 400 level anthro course.
Anyone see this ?
Gen.Flynn and Jill Stein dining with Putin.
Why was RT giving so much coverage to Jill stein ?
Flynn is a no brainier as he actually was a paid employee of Russian media.
Its seems that Jill Steins role was to try and take votes away from Clinton and get Trump elected.
She claims to be a jew but doesn’t look like one. perfect cover.
if i was the head of an intelligence operation i would make sure that may public agents were jews as they would benefit from the decades of work that the jews have done to make American fear questioning jews.
Why was RT giving so much coverage to Jill stein ?
almost as weird as a putative american putting [redacted by PP, feb 24, 2017]
i would’ve voted for stein if my vote had made any difference in my state. instead i voted for trump.
stein doesn’t look jewish?
anyone with a german sounding surname who has brown eyes is suspect.
my mom’s mom referred to my dad as “that nice jewish boy”. seriously!
but she was from alabama.
sad!
and my dad has BLUE eyes.
i know of no ancestor who didn’t.
i’m a “pure breeder” for blue eyes.
that’s weird. in today’s america.
every
single
one
of my great grandparents had
BLUE eyes.
but stein is an example of how women needn’t become un-attractive past 40.
of course women go through menopause, so from an evolutionary pov they should be disgusting after their last period.
but they aren’t. not to me.
maybe i’m a perv.
idk. i guess i am.
there’s this huge turn on of the well preserved woman.
women can be sexually attractive well past 50. 70 is the hard cutoff. how old is helen mirren? 71. still wanna do her.
but gold diggers wanna do it with 90 y old dudes.
gross!
You must have a huge crush on Martha Stewart then
i’d do her.
idk.
old people can hide their old-ness to some extent.
but i’m hetero. i’m attracted to the difference. that’s why i’d be doing afro’s mom.
age is NOT “just a number”, but the extent to which people conform to their age norm varies A LOT.
if you’ve been to a health club…
old folks bodies are distinguished in two ways…
1. fat everywhere. even when they’re not fat.
2. muscle atrophy…especially in the lower body.
the old woman or man is usually chicken legs covered in fat.
yuck!
Mugabe/ian smith has the funniest insights!
yes!
i wanna do jill stein.
afro’s fiancee has to “wait her turn”.
The only woman close to the age of 50 I would want to bang is Salma Hayek. Her rack is beautiful! (sorry if that sounds creepy)
by “bang” i assume you mean suck.
giving head to a woman.
they love it.
do i need to give a lesson on anatomy?
women have a dick! a teeny tiny dick.
they love to be fellated.
love it!
peepee knows.
creepy?
dudes on 13 y olds.
or dudettes on 13 y olds like deal with it.
female pedophiles.
watch out!
(sorry if that sounds creepy)
wtf?
peepee has to try harder.
g-man is NOT a believable human.
I don’t know. It just seems creepy thinking about a woman’s tits. Even though I want to see them and fondle them and play with them…
SHUT THE FUCK UP
I’m realer than everyone on this stupid blog fuck you very much!
I’ve seen a clitoris before that looked very big.
Creepy!
i was a TA at u-wisc and there was this 18 y old girl who wanted to ride me. very insistent.
seriously!
it was sick!
so when i jacked off…who did i think of?
my slightly older TEACHER…(assistant prof just hired)…
still want her.
smart
robust
not fat
huge ass
sch-uh-wing!
https://www.chem.wisc.edu/users/blackwel
she’s a lot older now and you can’t see her yummy body.
not that impressive looking…
exactly! that’s what i said!
but you haven’t seen her body.
tall and thick…
but not fat!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2128966/Ingrid-Bergman-beautiful–big-girl-broke-childs-bicycle–dont-ask-Joss-Ackland-thinks-Lauren-Bacall.html
that’s my deal.
i’m a perv.
Ingrid Bergman was beautiful – but she was such a big girl she broke my child’s bicycle…
eyes…
ingrid was NOT model quality…
except those eyes…
sex is concrete. not an abstraction.
ingrid was a real person behind those eyes.
intense.
that’s the turn on.
the person…
what’s so absurd about these science chicks and a lot of science men is…
they never marry. no children.
psychiatry and hbd-tards explain this as innate. there’s something wrong with them.
the reality is…
1. smart women have nothing wrong with them. physically they’re almost always MORE attractive. not to mention intellectually.
2. the same for very smart men.
so why no marriage and no children?
it’s obvious.
the very smart are trying to find “partners” in a much less densely populated landscape.
AND…
smart people are far less intent on marrying and pro-creating…even though they all jack off.
AND…
women want a man who’s as smart or smarter, just like they want a taller man. so very smart women have a harder time than very smart men. very smart men are content with a woman who’s smart but not that smart.
women want a man who’s as smart or smarter, just like they want a taller man. so very smart women have a harder time than very smart men. very smart men are content with a woman who’s smart but not that smart.
They also want a man more successful than they. Probably why Oprah never married. No black in American history has been as successful as her, with the possible exception of Obama who she elected. Of course it was virtually impossible for U.S. blacks to achieve money and power until the 1960s or so.
In my experience the most beautiful women are always average in intelligence. Intelligent women (my level of intelligence and higher) have a certain look about them that’s….intelligent? I don’t know, or maybe nerdy or something. Sometimes they’re pretty but very rarely beautiful.
Also, intelligent women seem to care less about their looks.
Smart women are a huge turn off. I find slightly dumb women (IQ 95) really know how to charm a guy and appeal to his ego, or maybe smart women just don’t care to. However smart women age better, but slightly dumb women are the hottest when they’re young.
all the women i’m still in love with…
looked them up on facebook/linkedin…
i’m a huge creep…
but…
let’s see…
an architect.
an actuary.
an MBA.
etc.
as i’ve said so many times…
men interpret their attraction as “she’s so beautiful”.
woman interpret their attraction as “he’s so charming”.
the reality is men and women are attracted to the same things.
for the most part.
they just interpret them differently.
Mugabe’s chem and actuarial background coming through here.
Smart people don’t repro because they’re not viable. Smart women tend to have looks and low test which is fine.
But smart guys are almost always nerdy or autistic or neurotic. The few smart guys go for bimbos and dumb women.
In my persona case, I would never go for a smart manipulative and and intense long term partner. I understand women enough, that beyond a certain level I don’t want to play games all the time and relax.
A long term partner for me would actually be an autist. There was a girl at reception who was autist and feminine and very submissive. That’s exactly how it would work.
Long term rels depend on polarity, not equality of attributes.
Would you say asian girls are autistic? they seem to like to play manipulative games too. Maybe master didnt care about selecting them.
so bizarre.
so bizarre.
perfect gender equality…by the dim lights of its contemporary advocates…
would mean…
man-whores…their bid-ness would take off.
not what women want.
instead…
iceland is the world’s most gender neutral country.
it had a dyke as president.
yet it’s still got the world’s most manly men in terms of strength.
….
i’m a feminist in that i think women have been under-utilized…
but as long as women can only be attracted to men who make more than they do…
feminism = TFR 0.5 or less.
you see this in squaw-tch.
she’s a crusader for equality of the sexes yet the BIGLAW gals with house husbands she thinks are LOSERS.
CONTRADICTION.
my deal is making fun of every commenter.
but haven’t hit pill yet.
how does one make fun of australians?
hard…
australia is close to my ideal country.
and the richest country on earth by some measures.
some thought.
let’s see…
found out a few days ago that there’ve been TWO melanesian/blackfellas in the NBA.
very interesting.
convergent evolution.
at genetic level patty is more like me than he is like afro.
http://images.performgroup.com/di/library/sportal_com_au/23/c6/patty-mills_14jf5v15wa1zv1hzbu9crix95z.jpg?t=1305756908w=500
as is jawai nathan.
sad!
…some thoughts…
found out a few days ago that there’ve been TWO melanesian/blackfellas in the NBA.
very interesting.
convergent evolution.
No Mug of Pee, they did not evolve negroid traits independently, they simply geneticly PRESERVED the african phenotype that all humans evolved from. They simply split off the evolutionary tree prematurely.
at genetic level patty is more like me than he is like afro.
Wrong again Mug of Peeeeeee!
Only on the neutral DNA that scientists use to estimate divergence time are they different from Afro
On the real DNA they are similar
lies.
pathetic lies.
would’ve left.
but australia’s points system required i have a masters from an aussie uni.
i’m still here.
fending off squatches.
hard work.
hard.
hard.
i’m hard.
I’m depressed
all you need is dick.
What is it that upset you,
how was your day?
I get depressed when I feel like I cannot do anything.
When I don’t have energy or I feel uncreative that is when I am depressed.
Usually depression is when you don’t get what you need. (Helplessness)
But it shouldn’t last too long if you talk to friends about your problems.
Support is the best way to solve any problem where you feel sad.
inject t.
it’s easy.
This blog does seem like it has a number of ball-sackless individuals.
Show us some pictures of yourself.