I was watching Charlie Rose tonight and he was interviewing Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic who won widespread praise for his article The Obama Doctrine. It’s amazing how much access Obama gave to this reporter and I suspect it’s because Obama was nervous that his tumultuous relationship with Bibi Netanyahu was alienating the Jewish community, so he bends over backwards to be nice to Jewish journalists.
During the interview Goldberg said that Obama has very little patience for people who are not as smart as him, and while Goldberg concedes that Obama’s very, very smart, he thinks Obama considers himself to be very, very, very smart.
Since an IQ of 100 is average intelligence, I think an IQ of 110 makes you smart, and an IQ of 120 makes you very smart. Thus it follows that an IQ of 130 makes you very, very smart, while an IQ of 140 makes you very, very, very smart. So if both men were familiar with the IQ scale, Goldberg might rate Obama 130, while Obama would rate Obama 140.
Yesterday Rose had on Presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin who talked about her relationship with Obama. Even before Obama was president, he wanted to meet Goodwin to talk about her book Team of Rivals, to understand how Lincoln could have staffed his cabinet with former adversaries. The book is credited with causing Obama to choose his former rival Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State.
While Goodwin could see Obama becoming a full-time writer and intellectual, she was more analytical about his intelligence than others. She said writers often write huge books because they can’t say things simply and for all of Obama’s skills as a communicator, she felt he couldn’t master the most important one of all: How to talk in sound bites in our fast paced media age. That takes a different kind of thinking, Goodwin explained.
I’ve sometimes thought verbal IQ could be divided into two sub-categories: writing IQ vs talking IQ. Obama delivered brilliantly written speeches but his real time debate performances against rivals as diverse Alan Keyes, Hillary Clinton, and Mitt Romney, were often panned.
Pumpkin Person 
“Talking” IQ probably only has a low correlation with overall verbal ability. Someone who is verbally cunning like Donald Trump doesn’t necessarily have a high verbal IQ, but the ability to improvise short “sound bite” phrases in response to any question or argument. Listen to Donald Trump’s interviews. The single-syllable vocabulary and vague general knowledge demonstrated in these responses don’t illustrate high verbal IQ but perhaps do illustrate “talking” IQ. His answers are fast, not detailed.
I’m guessing “talking IQ”/”verbal cunningness” is probably an aspect of the personality traits psychopathy, extroversion, or the Dark Triad. A useful set of traits for con-men, swindlers, and mountebanks. Allows for shallow but quick thinking.
That Obama is such a deep thinker who prefers writing to talking indicates that he is low on Dark Triad, contrary to what his enemies may believe.
Well, just as Trump’s writing skills would probably underestimate his level of g, his talking skills probably overestimate his level of g. So combining them together might give a better estimate of his IQ than his writings alone. I think speaking requires certain cognitive functions that writing misses, and vice versa.
But I don’t think talking skill was the key to Trump’s rise, and there were many occasions where he put his foot in his mouth. His real “genius” was spotting an opportunity. He noticed the elephant in the room no one was talking about (immigration) and had the guts to use his status as a wealthy celeb to exploit an issue lobbyist funded politically correct politicians wouldn’t dare touch.
You might be right that talking loads on certain personality traits like extraversion and psychopathy, but writing also loads on other personality traits like introversion, patience, self-discipline etc. Neither is a pure a measure of cognitive ability.
Obama probably is less psychopathic than the average President, though his liberal use of drones seems cold blooded.
Very interesting points. Both talking ability and writing ability are “contaminated” by personality factors.
And yes, I agree that Trump’s biggest talent was spotting the biggest issue no one was talking about, which of course was immigration (and trade deals, and globalization in general). Although Scott Adams (the Dilbert creator) seems to believe it was more of Trump’s “persuasion” skills and ability to frame his opponents in a bad way than anything else (I like how he explains it in this interview):
One could argue that persuasion is not so much verbal IQ, but Theory of Mind IQ.
Trumps rise has to do with white people “waking up”,. Whites irrespective if political leaning supported Trump when they read a news paper article stating that whites would become a minority by 2042. Though whites low in ethnic and racial identification who read the news paper article were no more likely to vote for Trump and still supported Sanders and Clinton.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/12/24/the-threat-of-increasing-diversity-why-many-white-americans-supported-trump-in-the-2016-presidential-election/
So basically whites who have high ethnic and racial identification were more likely to be concerned about the future while whites low in racial and ethnic identification were not worried and still supported candidates and policies that would lead to their eventual replacement.
Scott Adams is retarded lol. He’s just a typical autistic engineer. Lion likes him because he has aspergers.
Scott Adams is retarded lol. He’s just a typical autistic engineer. Lion likes him because he has aspergers.
Except DJ Vlad, the UC Berkeley Comp Sci major turned hip hop business executive with high verbal IQ and theory of the mind, thinks Scott Adams is a genius also….
That’s nice Gondwana but according to Peepee, I have the highest social IQ on this blog. So, you should defer to my judgment.
Hahaha, good old Deal.
Anyways.
Scott has the highest Theory of Mind I’ve seen possibly in the Western World. Calling him an aspie is like called Da Vinci ‘uncreative’. His psychological theories are a breakthrough in psychology. Psychology has been starved of breakthroughs once is was purposely turned into a hamburger flipping subject whose sole aim is to prove how rac-ist(TM) white people are so that they bow to ____.
(a) Scott Adams
(b) McDonald’s Corporation
(c) Oprah
(d) (((O___0))))
DaVinci was a beta male and a hack. Our very own illuminaticat has drawn beautiful diagrams but no one calls him a genius. In modern times, DaVinci would’ve been impaled in a public square by a black dildo.
Is Deal some sort of NSA employee I wonder. Wouldn’t be uncommon for an NSA analyst to stumble across this blog and start using his google peoples private lives tools handed to him by Zion to start trolling people.
Notice how Deal never really talks about politics in concrete terms.
Have I cracked it Deal?
One of the few mercies of Zion’s Order is that at least the analysts chosen can’t be schiz or verbally smart, but autist and brainwashed or rule following.
So letting a bunch of autists know my private life is not as anxiety provoking as it may be for others.
My spider sense also tells me that Deal!, if that is indeed an account attributable to a canadian woman, watches a lot of porn.
The imagery and word choice is very peculiar.
For example, you said you liked Robert’s comments and then mentioned you were a ‘mandingo-phile’. Such a strange word choice.
When people see Robert’s more pictorial comments I see into his mind a bit in the way he makes associations and digressions linked to emotions.
This is why, as another commenter once said, having to great an understanding of a person’s mind leads pretty quickly to paranoid personality disorder.
I am well aware of the depths that a person can go without regulation.
Pizzagate is 100% true. They really are a paedophile ring.
This is why, as another commenter once said, having to great an understanding of a person’s mind leads pretty quickly to paranoid personality disorder.
The continuum goes like this:
Autistic = fails to see intentions when intentions are there
Neurotypical = sees intentions that autistics miss
Borderline schizophrenic = sees intentions that neurotypicals miss
Schizophrenic = sees intentions that don’t exist
The sweet spot for social IQ is probably borderline schizophrenia. Anything more than that and you become just as socially unintelligent as autistics if not more so; just in the opposite direction.
You need to apply logic to your social theories, to make sure you haven’t crossed the line from social insight to psychosis.
That’s right Pumpkin.
One of my eyes sees true and clear. And my other eye sees crimson distortion.
You have no idea how much I’d like to be wrong actually. It would be such a relief. I remember one day when I found out I was wrong about something, I danced down the street in public.
And I remember another day when I saw a small detail in narrative about someone. And I sat there. Something only 1 in a million people would spot, if they hadn’t noticed a pattern. Very very minor.
And it was a shocking thing to suspect. And I kept digging and digging and digging and eventually I turned up my darkest suspicion and fear – et voila. That was a day I will live in infamy.
I remember one day when I found out I was wrong about something, I danced down the street in public.
Was it when you suspected Deal with it to be PP ?
Obama has self-awareness.
Scott Adams has self-awareness.
Self-awareness is key to (g). It comes from impulse control.
The brain is a signals processor. Perceptual resolution increases as frequency increases. Awareness then becomes sharper and directed. More items can be dealt with at a time. The mind starts to stand back and watch thinking occur without effort.
Two days ago I noticed a buzzing in my ears. This buzz is normal and is present in everyone. I noticed that if I focused on it the sound got louder or quieter. I made it go down low enough that I became more self-aware. I could process more information. I could hear better. My dreams became more real. I have less insomnia. More energy and more clarity.
Obama seems to internalize thoughts. He is introverted. That is why he writes well. Scott is more extroverted like me, he talks fast. His comics reflect compact ideas. Obama makes longer expressions. Scott makes short expressions. Both may be the same length yet the in/out dynamic makes them drive context in different directions. Compact Concise Concursive Compounded. Obama sounds deep just listing to him speak. His comprehension is really good. Obama is ENFJ. Scott is ENTP. Both could be 140 in (g). But as for FSIQ Obama is not bellow 125.
Obama has Introverted Intuition
Scott Adams has Extroverted Intuition.
Their perception axis is opposite.
Obama’s introvert**
Obama’s have a SELFish-awareness, quaaaasi…
😉
My spider sense also tells me that Deal!, if that is indeed an account attributable to a canadian woman, watches a lot of porn.
The imagery and word choice is very peculiar.
For example, you said you liked Robert’s comments and then mentioned you were a ‘mandingo-phile’. Such a strange word choice.
You’ve called me fat, bipolar, slutty, sperm trashcan, low sexual market value, porn addict, etc..
An impartial observer, should he exist, will note that a guy wouldn’t have to put up with so many personal insults. You’re just not a good fucking person. I saw your comments about Jews the other day. You’re deplorable. I don’t care if it’s the Internet.
You’re just not a good fucking person.
but ron jeremy is a good…fucking person. that is, he’s good for the reverse cowgirl.
I saw your comments about Jews the other day. You’re deplorable.
again with the double entendre. “deplorable” is now how all followers of pepe/kek/trump would describe themselves.
You didn’t see the comments. He basically called for another holocaust.
Mohammed Ali probably have a high talking IQ. But writting IQ is certainly much more correlated with real verbal IQ (as mesured by IQ tests).
I think Ali tested 80IQ on the army battery test. The army tests were pretty robust from my recollection.
His IQ is 85, PP wrote an article on it.
Real talk intelligence is the raal verbal intelligence because isn’t abstract on papers in the same “fly ability” is the real bird intelligence.
Of course vocabulary is a addendum, very important but the basis of verbal intelligence is in verbal analogies, understanding of meaning and “real-talk”.
“Obama delivered brilliantly written speeches”
He’s not called the teleprompter in chief for nothing. The man needs a teleprompter to deliver a good speech. Without it he fumbles all over his words. He’s nothing without the teleprompter.
”He THINK…”
”intellig–ence is the capacity to adapt”
… only or specially during environmental changes or disturbance…
Adaptation is more a IDEAL concept than a factually generalized/practical concept.
If you have an organism who can adapt to the new environment’s WITHOUT natural selection, i mean, individually speaking and not collectively, so you have a truly clever-adaptative creature.
”Environment” (climate, inter-species dynamics, etc) change… within a intra-diversity of types, the most fittest of this types to the new requirements will ”adapt” OR survive more…
Adaptation, real ones, all the time is more about individual than about collectivities.
this is the supremacy of the environment, more luck than real intelligence, the being itself fighting against circumstances and really adapting to this challenging environment.
When you born in the right place and time, so it’s not exactly the real effort to the adapt, to be challenged… just luck, maybe you must be thanks for God!!
When you, a individual being, born in the wrong place and time and still can adapt/to fight back/to understand factually well this subjectively negative reality, summarizing, being really challenged and you ”win”, so you’re very adaptative-clever.
Of course, because we are encapsulated by the collective, is more difficult to put it in real practices…
PP
please don’t tell me you believe that there is hostility between Obama and Yahoo.
Yahoo told Obama to destabilize Syria and Libya and he did it without even putting it to a vote
He has done everything that Yahoo wanted of him except a war with iran.
What i find strange about PP is that he is always trying to prove how much he loves blacks. Oprah , Obama , Michelle whatever.
Did you bully a black kid when you were in middle school and now you’re older you feel bad about it?
Did you cheat on a black girlfriend and break her little heart and now feel remorse?
You pour a ridiculous amount praise on anything that’s black and has legs .
This cant be normal. There must be a backstory.
Yahoo….? If you’re attempting that stupid pol shit, you mean “Skypes”.
And yea Obama sucks. Worst “President” ever. 13 days!! Then again, Mr Oompa Loompa is next. Sigh.
yahoo as in Netanyahu
LOL at the skypes , googles, youtubes and skittles
all those damn googles rioting in Baltimore !
All liberals hold that the Magic Negro as a sacred object. This is due to jewish gamma teddy bear anchoring. From our youngest days, we are saturated by friendly, cool, moral black figures in our schoolbooks, tv, movies, etc etc.
We are never informed about black crime, black dysfunction, 80% of black single mothers, black low IQ etc etc.
This is why Bill Gates gives money to Africa. Why Madonna adopt black babies.
They never had the verbal intelligence and unique socialisation to shrug indoctrination.
The only types of men that can ‘shrug’ indoctrination naturally are – verbal genius (e.g. James Joyce), schiz, and alpha/sigma. Others have to have painful life experiences, reeducation and a revelation.
Pumpkin is no more capable of explaining this predilection than any SJW who trots out the usual, “This is wrong, not only to X, but blacks, Group Y, Group Z, close”.
Blacks come first in the psychological priming of the Necromancer. Notice it in any interview. I dare you.
Even in the UK,where asians are 8% of the pop, they come behind blacks in the SJW sermon: “This is wrong, not only to X, but blacks, [asians….women, gay] close.
Because they are the most extreme primitive race of man. If the Necromancer can get whites to accept Kinshasa…he will accept anything. Are you beginning to see why I hate Zion so very much?
Blacks are 2% of the pop in the UK. 50% of the ads.
No joking.
50% of the ads. 2% of the pop.
Zion.
On bill gates he 100% gets racial differences, but he comes from a tech background which prevents him from seeing his errors.
I come from that background and i can tell you that i am absolutely surrounded by people who think that progress is infinite .
Gates comes from a sub-culture that went from dealing with computers the size of a small bedroom, to computers that fit into the palms of their hands.
That experience is so powerful that in their minds any problem can be ended just by working hard on it, which prevents them from accepting genetic determinism.
.
Yes, but not in the way you think he gets it.
Gates believes Africans are poor and maybe stupid because of bad hygiene, sanitation, malaria and so on.
He’s half right that that environment leads one to be more R selected, because surplus production and then, a centralised state can do a K selection cycle.
He’s probably read Jared Diamond’s book.
I don’t think he intrinsically ‘feels’ that blacks are what most people sans brainwashing see them as. He is fairly spergy, like Buffet.
He thinks if he can fix the environment, we’ll see big declines in rape in effect.
What he doesn’t get is the R selection has a momentum of its own. Africans reverted to Kinshasa in America, the richest nation in the world.
This is the KINSHASA PROBLEM of humankind. As Africa’s population trebles because white people give them advanced medicine, we will see the KINSHASA PROBLEM grow.
Blacks are not meant to live in civilised societies. All other races of man react to blacks differently than say, hispanics, asians, arabs and so on. Its a big difference.
Your theory of Jews being a race of Gammas might have a grain of truth, since Jews were evolved as people for societal adaptation and not societal creation.
As I keep saying, the Jew is the one race of man that looked at 1950s America and said – this must be torn down, this must be reversed. This innocence and splendour must be vilified and made unwholesome.
We must put the Jews and the Orcs on top, and the whites on the bottom. We must sabotage this in a sly and cunning manner with maximum casualty.
The east asians, indians in the West are also smart people. I have never in my life encountered people in these communities who have that kind of thinking or write sophistry with the above aim.
Although the arabs have a similar tendency to sabotage, but nowhere near the IQ to pull it off.
You can see the Jew is essentially a high IQ version of his MENA brothers. Israel like you say without western tribute money would perhaps revert strongly to the arab mean than the Western mean. It is not a ‘white’ race of man.
“This cant be normal. There must be a backstory.”
PP’s just saying “look, I’m not racist, there are even some black people that I respect”.
He once told me that he’s been with more more black women than I will ever will, and that most black women would prefer him to me… That was after he talked about my “jungle monkey dick”. Don’t know what he told them about their “jungle monkey pussy.
JP Rushton et al—-“Don’t try to say you know someone’s IQ based off of averages.”
Pp 2016—-“you’re black so you have a big peepee.”
What happened to not judging individuals from group averages?
RR
Judging people based on averages beats waiting for someone to pull down their shorts everytime.
More jew sophistry dismantled today.
But use medians, not averages.
LOL
“Judging people based on averages beats waiting for someone to pull down their shorts everytime.”
Racial differences in penis size don’t exist and I agree about medians.
“Racial differences in penis size don’t exist and I agree about medians.”
RR, if you’re in business you can’t judge your clients based on averages or medians. You need to understand their individuality very accurately or I’m scared that you’re heading toward bankruptcy.
Can I be let out of moderation filtering? I’ve calmed down now.
Obama did alienate the Jews, at least the ones who show their true colors for not liking non-whites.
Obama’s legacy was to empower the non-Anglo, non-white nations/groups, and weakening the Whites of the Anglo Prole Sphere. It’s was the 1st phase of this ingroup vs outgroup, tribal conflict.
The world’s conflict between races/countries involve the Anglo Sphere and most of the 3rd world. Israel is a nexus or extension of it in the Middle East.
And some of your commenters, according to Mugabe when he becomes pro-American, the Anglo Sphere, especially America is a nation for winners only. One needs to be aggressive, tribal and very smart to thrive in America. There is no other way.
Jews are a very good example, because they play these rules by the book.
One thing that separates high IQ Ashkenazim vs high IQ East Asian, is the smart schizo vs the smart autist….schizos tend to be aggressive while autists are not.
So someone who gave them everything they wanted is called hostile?
Even Bush didn’t given them their Iran war.
The fact that you think he was hostile means that their tactic worked like a charm.
Read the protocols .
Bush & Co bombed the shit out of Iraq, which was a more eminent danger to Israel than Iran.
Obama only alienated those who were not in the loop.
If they ever, for even a second, thought he was against the chosen people they would have slaughtered him in the media, black or not black.
The media have given him a pass on outright criminality ( fast & furious etc), which would never have happened if he wasn’t in their good books.
Remember that someone who is not seen as a puppet of the jews is the best person to keep the anti-Zionist left on a tight leash.
Read the protocols of the learned elders of zion .
The Obama admin was the most hostile/apathetic toward Israel.
You can bet that the Clintons, the Bushes and the now the Trumps, are very pro-Israel. The Obamas are not, and it’s a race thing.
Hahaha
I like the cut of your jib Jimmy.
I was banging on about the Protocols a while ago.
Debunkers still can’t give a good answer as to why ‘Zionist controlling the media and picture houses’ actually came to pass in Western countries. Crickets. Its not like media was always owned by Jews as Orson Welles reminds us.
As Lord Sydenham said, if its based on a satirical book from the 1880s or whatever why does it predict subsequent World Jewry’s strategic moves so clearly?
So we either have a Borges/Monty Python type situation where a bunch of gentiles write a satirical ‘how to take over the world’ book based on gentile prejudices of jews of the time and the jews themselves say, ‘thats a fucking good idea, lets do it’ or it really is the real deal based on Herzl’s writings (which I have not read).
Or the satirical writers in the 1880s had to pretend it was satire without getting their throats slit. That could be it too.
I also note our friend Allen Dulles was among the first intelligence analysts to ‘debunk’ it.
Allen Dulles. That man.
The clintons are certainly not pro-jew in private.
Remember that Monica Lewinsky was an israeli and still lives in israel.
that whole thing was an israeli op .
No one likes the jews but they still serve them like Obama did.
The jury is still out on trump. If i had to make a bet i would say 65% chance he will be a puppet.
Remember that Monica Lewinsky was an israeli and still lives in israel.
that whole thing was an israeli op .
Don’t push theories you can’t back up with evidence
I’m pretty sure Nixon was deposed by jews as well. Nixon was a notorious anti-semite. But I’ve just seen he helped out Israel in the Yom Kippur war.
I also see Gen Brown, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of staff was nearly forced to resign because he said the US only got involved because “Israel controls the banking system”.
Aha!!
The conspiracy theory is a conspiracy fact.
The Jews are the gamma race of man.
I’m going to head off now before I start writing more colourful things about our friendly highly admired and really really definitely helpful 1% minority who really really make the US a stronger nation and don’t distort peoples minds and absolutely fight to not to degrade and cuckold and debase white people and their sons and daughters who took in our innocent friendly brothers who are really really super treasured and how the EU is a really good collectivist bolshevik super duper REALLY REALLY great. idea..feoijnAND *(T^% I just cant express how much I though Bella and her Bulldogs was a great show and how really really apposite it was to show to little girls, just like the stuff they show to young women to turn them into reall really good models of femaledom in line with Detroit really really positive contirbutioNI:OFUBnhedwlyuiguihlbhf4ewuily4bfiulh489ptyr37468
If Iz keeps on learnins this stuff mezza gonna have a stroke sumday!
The clintons are certainly not pro-jew in private.
The Clintons’ in laws are Jewish.
Philosph
” He thinks if he can fix the environment, we’ll see big declines in rape in effect”
exactly what i meant .
Why is my comment in moderation ? what on earth is wrong with that post?
is it the protocols ? Grow up man ! just grown up
you are becoming more and more of a baby as the days go on.
PP needs to find a nice black women to calm him down and make him great again.
You , her and some fried chicken and watermelon will do the trick .
Sometimes comments get automatically flagged but i usually take them out as I’ve done with yours
pp
http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-said-to-have-offered-lewinsky-tapes-for-pollard/
oh and this Lewinsky creature is now calling for the censorship of social media because of anti-israel stuff people are saying .
She is a hardcore zionist activist with no shame .
Yeah Jimmy. Great link. Read Henry Goldman’s biography. His daughter mentions in passing Cheim Wiezmann blackmailing Woodrow Wilson into getting into WW1 so the Brits would declare a home state for Israel, the Balfour Decleration.
Jews love blackmail.
Epstein’s child sex ring had videocameras everywhere.
Zion’s favoured strategy.
JS
“The Clintons’ in laws are Jewish”
political expediency .
A la Donaldo Trumpstas
This is a very good debate.
splain mssr philosophe.
something tells me the cat is out of the bag…ain’t no way QE is gonna end well.
what the above shows is…you bankers fucked up, so we’ll give you lots of free money to fix your balance sheets. what other business sectors get free money?
and it will all be cloaked in the arcana of money and banking and “economic science”.
I never said I was for QE.
not an answer.
it is also noteworthy for goldbugs that the global MB is still less than the total value of gold. or at least it was when this chart was produced. at $1,500 an ounce total value of mined gold is $8+ trillion.
these commenters are stupid and boring.
Your face is stupid and boring.
i look like a much better looking and predatory hitch.
Why three very?? Look childish.
Years old but what I think is weird here is that every person who we see him struggle against in debates are also people who have IQs that would be estimated in the 140’s range.