Since the 1970s, the black-white IQ gap has dramatically shrunk on scholastic tests:
For example, on a scale where white 12th graders average 100, the reading scores of black 12th graders would have increased from IQ 80 in the 1970s to IQ 90 in recent years.
Meanwhile the math scores of black 12th graders have increased from IQ 82 in the 1970s to IQ 86 in recent years.
Assuming about a 0.67 correlation between reading and math skill from the 1970s to today, this suggests the composite scholastic black IQ has increased from IQ 79 in the 1970s to IQ 87 in recent years. A gain of 8 points!
But on official adult IQ tests like the WAIS, the black-white IQ gap has been stable since the 1970s, and probably since the pre-Wechsler IQ tests of WWI.
When the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Revised) (WAIS-R) was normed in 1978, whites outscored blacks by 14.6 points (U.S. norms). By the time the WAIS-IV was normed in 2006, the gap was 15.7 points.
| white iq (u.s. norms) | black iq (u.s. norms) | white iq (white norms) | black iq (white norms) | black-white iq gap (u.s. norms) | black-white iqgap (white norms) | |
| wais-r (1978) | 101.4 (sd = 14.65) | 86.8 (sd = 13.14) | 100 (sd = 15) | 85 (sd = 13.45) | 14.6 | 15 |
| wais-iii (1995) | 102.6 (sd = 14.81) | 89.1 (sd = 13.31) | 100 (sd = 15) | 86 (sd = 13.48) | 13.5 | 14 |
| wais-iv (2006) | 103.4 (sd = 14) | 87.7 (sd = 14.4) | 100 (sd = 15) | 83 (sd = 15.43) | 15.7 | 17 |
WAIS-IV U.S. norms from pg 27 (Table A1) of Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence from Standardization Samples by William T. Dickens & James R. Flynn and from pg 190 of WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced Clinical Interpretation edited by James A. Holdnack, Lisa Drozdick, Lawrence G. Weiss, Grant L. Iverson
Conclusion
What this suggests is that in past decades, scholastic tests underestimated the intelligence of blacks while official IQ tests have not. This is also consistent with the Minnesota transracial adoption study done in the 1970s, where blacks kids adopted into upper middle class white homes scored 10 IQ points higher than the black average on scholastic tests, but not at all above the black average on the WAIS-R.
Of course, this was not an apples to apples comparison of the gap on achievement tests and official IQ tests, since the scholastic data is from 12th graders while the WAIS data is from adults of all ages
Pumpkin Person 
“scholastic tests” in peepee-tard’s sense aren’t IQ tests.
the SAT, etc. ARE.
and as you can see, the gap is INCREASING! peepee is a fucktard.
furthermore one must take into consideration changes in the test.
the black white gap varies with the IQ tests, even when it’s an official IQ test.
peepee is still moderating comments.
the SAT from 1978 to 2012 shows exactly the same pattern as the WAIS.
No it doesn’t. The gap on the WAIS has remained the same while the SAT gap has substantially declined, then stabilized, only to then increase again:
In 1976 The College Board published an analysis of the racial differences in scores of the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT). At that time the average black score was about 240 points, or 20 percent, below the average white score. When The College Board next examined the racial scoring gap in the early 1980s, the gap had shrunk to 200 points. Black scores were then 17 percent lower than white scores. By 1988 the black-white SAT test scoring gap was down to 189 points. The trend was distinctly encouraging. Many specialists in the educational community predicted that in time the racial scoring gap would disappear altogether.
But after 1989 progress in closing the SAT gap stopped abruptly and later it began to open up. For the five-year period between 2000 and 2005 the gap between black and white scores on the SAT test expanded.
http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
YES PEEPEE-TARD. IT’S EXACTLY THE SAME PATTERN. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THAT THE SAT WAS CHANGED WITH THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF NARROWING THE GAP IN 1995!!! DID THE WAIS DO THAT? NO!!! THE POST 1995 SATs ARE MUCH LESS IQ TESTS THAN THOSE WHICH PRECEDED IT.
1978: 15
1995: 14
2010: 17
high
low
high
IF YOU HAD DATA FROM 1976 OR EARLIER IT WOULD BE MORE INTERESTING.
AND IT WOULD BE MORE INTERESTING STILL IF YOU HAD DATA ON MORE THAN ONE “OFFICIAL” IQ TEST.
YES PEEPEE-TARD. IT’S EXACTLY THE SAME PATTERN. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THAT THE SAT WAS CHANGED WITH THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF NARROWING THE GAP IN 1995!!!
Yes, but the entire narrowing of the black-white SAT gap happened BEFORE 1995. Duh!
1978: 15
1995: 14
2010: 17
high
low
high
14, 15, and 17, are all roughly 1 SD. The 1 SD gap on Wechsler style IQ tests has existed since about 1917.
The gap has been increasing since the late 1980s, but is overall way down since the 1970s. Also, the SAT tests only the college bound elite, including from Africa, not the general U.S. population of 17-year-olds.
the SAT tests only the college bound elite
that’s exactly why such tests are far better measures of the high end than “official” IQ tests which simply can’t say much of anything about percentiles greater than (1 – 1/N) where N = population used for norming the test. so even if the formula comes out IQ = 160 on the WAIS or WISC, that’s not an actual percentile at all, it’s an extrapolated percentile.
N may be as small as 2000 and varies over ages from 18 to 90 or so.
N for the following (which are taken by young people 95% of the time):
SAT – 1.7m (2015)
LSAT – 171,514 (2009 – 2010)
GMAT – 247,432 (2015)
in 1978 the average gap (V + Q)/2 was 16.875 in IQ points.
then it went down to 13.
then after the test was made less IQ-test like in order to narrow the gap, the gap still went up to 14.625.
Not sure where you’re getting those IQ equivalents, but keep in mind that the IQ gap on the COMBINED SAT might be larger than the gap on the subscales. I’ll be doing a post on this soon.
AND ON TOP OF THAT THERE IS NO DATA ON THE HISTORY OF THE GAP IN SOI-DISANT IQ TESTS, BECAUSE NONE OF THEM ARE GIVEN TO A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE. AT BEST THERE WILL BE REPORTS ON A SMALL AND GEOGRAPHICALLY RESTRICTED POPULATION BY PROFESSORS.
YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHAT UTTER SCAMS THEY ARE FROM A PURELY PSYCHOMETRIC/STATISTICAL POV.
AT BEST THERE WILL BE REPORTS ON A SMALL AND GEOGRAPHICALLY RESTRICTED POPULATION BY PROFESSORS.
Do you have any idea how the WAIS is normed? The sample is weighted to reflect the entire country in terms of race, geographic region, sex, education & occupation.
do you have any idea how that’s 100% irrelevant?
When the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Revised) (WAIS-R) was normed in 1978, whites outscored blacks by 14.6 points (U.S. norms). By the time the WAIS-IV was normed in 2006, the gap was 15.7 points.
100% MEANINGLESS. THE NORMS ARE ON A FEW THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT ANYTHING LIKE REPRESENTATIVE. AND OF THOSE FEW THOUSAND, HOW MANY ARE BLACK?
…but not on official IQ tests…
AND THE WECHSLER IS ONLY ONE TEST FUCKTARD.
STILL WAITING FOR PEEPEE TO TAKE A SINGLE IQ TEST AS AN ADULT.
100% MEANINGLESS. THE NORMS ARE ON A FEW THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT ANYTHING LIKE REPRESENTATIVE. AND OF THOSE FEW THOUSAND, HOW MANY ARE BLACK?
A few hundred are black, and they’re exquisitely chosen to match census variables for occupation, education, sex, region of the country etc.
Scientific samples tend to be much, much smaller than convenience samples but the quality is so much better and the standard error can be calculated.
how’d those “scientific” samples work out on nov 8, 2016 peepee-tard?
Pretty well, at the national level. Hillary won the popular vote.
And to the extent the polls were wrong; they were wrong because they couldn’t predict how many Trump fans would turnout. That’s different from incorrectly measuring how many Trump supporters there were.
STILL WAITING FOR PEEPEE TO TAKE A SINGLE IQ TEST AS AN ADULT.
Pumpkin has postulated that adult IQ tests are probably less reliable than childhood IQ tests since they’re more a measure of education than innate intelligence. And I’m inclined to agree.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/08/22/is-iq-more-accurate-when-measured-in-childhood/
STILL WAITING FOR PEEPEE TO TAKE A SINGLE IQ TEST AS AN ADULT.
At least he’s produced IQ scores. All you’ve produced are college admission scores.
i’ve only taken one “official” IQ test afaik. and i was 9 years old. and the purpose of the test was not to assess my IQ, it was to assess whether or not i had a learning disability. i don’t have that test now, and the conclusion of the “psychometrician” who met with my parents was…no learning disability.
i also qualified for TAG via what i assume was an “official” IQ test in the 3d grade. i assume this, because i remember the questions were much more abstract than those on the CAT.
i also remember my case being discussed in the principal’s office. the same thing happened to my dad. his teachers thought he was stupid, but then he scored very high on some IQ-like test and they couldn’t believe it.
my dad is a cunt but sometimes he has had insight. he said…
if you’re smart you know the schools are fucked.
that is, if you’re truly gifted, you will be a “gifted underachiever”.
i’ve only taken one “official” IQ test afaik. and i was 9 years old. and the purpose of the test was not to assess my IQ,
Well they assessed your IQ whether that was the purpose or not
it was to assess whether or not i had a learning disability. i don’t have that test now, and the conclusion of the “psychometrician” who met with my parents was…no learning disability.
Well of course not, because many school boards define a learning disability as achievement scores much lower than predicted by official IQ scores. You had the complete opposite profile.
Almost of us have some learning disability the difference is not have or not but how significant is your WEAKNESS/learning disability, 😉
Seems common mental health professionals confuse temporary cognitive challenges, individual idiosyncrasies or even real AND normal cognitive deficits, compared with pairs in the school or community, with long-life mental disorders. To work with mental health people you must need to be quite perceptive/subtle, but many and many Freudian pupils Don’t appear to be like that.
Other problem is: Many learning disabilities tend to be confused with social and special economic dis adjustment. My “anecdotal example”. I have a brother who seems have ADHD traits, lack of attention, specially. But he never showed this problem in the school of work places. Result: He never was diagnosed with ADHD or at least with lack of attention. Their lack of attention is not just about their things or even about other people. He is quite inconvenient, seems a case of lack of empathetic attention, common in men and exacerbated in my middle bro. Because my middle brother never showed lack of attention in school specially he never was diagnosed. He must be diagnosed with lack of empathetic attention. Of course no medications but some professional orientations or try.
Almost of mental health professionals are unlikely look to my brother as someone with some mental disorder. Yep, normies follow, like and protect other normies. In other hand seems many children who simply dislike schools has been wrongly diagnosed with ADHD.
Well of course not, because many school boards define a learning disability as achievement scores much lower than predicted by official IQ scores. You had the complete opposite profile.
i didn’t say anything about my “achievement scores” fucktard.
and you don’t know what my WISC score was. all i know is it was at least 130.
i score 19 on vocab, the most g loaded subtest.
PEE CAN’T READ AND IS A COMPULSIVE LIAR.
I WAS GIVEN THE TEST PRECISELY BECAUSE I WASN’T ACHIEVING FUCKTARD.
All we know is that you did not come anywhere close to matching your SAT/GRE level on ANY subtest except vocab.
i don’t know that.
so how do you?
ah yes! you don’t! you just made it up!
COMPULSIVE LYING IS A MENTAL ILLNESS PEEPEE.
The highest possible WISC-R subtest score is +3 SD, so if vocab was your highest score (you now say high score), all your other scores must have been below +3 SD & thus below your SATs/GREs
Deductive reasoning is not lying MugOfPee
“Deductive reasoning is not lying MugOfPee”
It is philosophizing though. =^)
I’m not au fait with psychometrics like the rest of you seem to be, but as far as possible tests should not be changed in composition or questioning.
Scholastic testing and I imagine the SAT has been watered down.
The only tests that seem worthwhile for international comparisons are the PISA tests where they have to keep asking the exact same things.
Not surprisingly, imputed IQ of even Australians and Swedes is dropping. Because IQ is not a R selected trait and the sexual market is deregulating. And, nutrition standards and immigration is killing IQ.
You should look at the change between the various WAIS reforms to see.
There is usually a political agenda behind IQ test standard changing, not technical problems.
Zion would be angry if we realised blacks are fundamentally more R. It would be even angrier if we realised how high the jews do.
Jews are 0.8% of the population.
Many of their high level people can’t be sampled because they’re hidden. In the same way the ghetto makes it hard to find representative blacks.
“Blacks become smarter” or whites become less “$smarter”??? People tend to assume cleansing gaps are caused by improvement of the delayed part, rarely this might be caused by the reduction in achievements of the privileged group.
Seems hbd already debated about changes in scholastic curriculum since the 50’s.
Many Hispanics are afro descendents. Non Hispanic blacks or only blacks?? African immigration also need to be analyzed, their possible impact in the possibly-supposedly increase in overall afram “IQ”.
Abortion rates that are huge among afram may have a impact. % of engaged homosexuali activities.
Maybe we are seeing a convergence of factors with particular impacts orchestrating sensible changes in this ideologically forced comparative dynamic, white versus black comparisons.
https://twitter.com/ASavageNation
Michael Savage has just said on twitter that it “isn’t a crime to lynch Obama”….
Sometimes even us para schiz look at each other and think:
Off the Reservation.
and on top of that…
the WAIS and WISC are EXTREMELY unreliable, other “official” IQ tests i don’t know.
NOT in the literature of the Psychological Corporation of course…they have tests to sell!!!
but when they are actually administered by people who aren’t employed by the Psychological Corporation…
scores vary enormously with the person administering the test!!!
IT’S A SCAM!
the SAT, etc. are graded by machine. there’s ZERO subjectivity.
and on top of that…
the WAIS and WISC are EXTREMELY unreliable, other “official” IQ tests i don’t know.
The Wechsler would not have a g loading of 0.9+ if it was extremely unreliable
NOT in the literature of the Psychological Corporation of course…they have tests to sell!!!
So does the college board, which is why they downplay how coachable the SAT might be
the SAT, etc. are graded by machine. there’s ZERO subjectivity.
There’s also zero quality control. Some people take the test drunk or without knowing English. Some give up half way through or decide to cheat. Others take it after years of coaching. And most people don’t take it at all, and because the sample is not scientific, the norms are ambiguous.
Question since you’re much more knowledgeable on this than I am:
How would you control for school quality? For instance, how would you know if all of the kids in the sample got taught what would eventually be on the test? I took the SAT and bombed it because I was literally taught not a thing on it.
My sense is that the SAT is an excellent measure of IQ among people in the same school, but two schools might have the same Wechsler IQ, but differ greatly in SAT IQ. I would need to do a lot more research before I advised you on how you should adjust your SAT scores, assuming it’s worth doing.
So PP: Are you still standing by your Darwinistic Doomsday scenario where the smarter races will eat the dumber races alive and the smarter individuals of a particular group will cannibalize their own who are dumber?
So PP: Are you still standing by your Darwinistic Doomsday scenario where the smarter races will eat the dumber races alive and the smarter individuals of a particular group will cannibalize their own who are dumber?
Broadly speaking. I think sadly, the lowest IQ populations will go extinct first, while the highest IQ ethnic groups will expand their territory. This will just be an average trend of course. There will be lots of exceptions, since there’s a lot more to Darwinian fitness than just intelligence. And luck is also a major factor in evolution. If an asteroid hadn’t hit 65 million years ago, the dinosaurs would still walk among us.
In Astrology, we will be heading into the Pluto in Aquarius transit in about 8 years, and this when smart humans invent cyberborgs to eliminate their enemies — according to some astrologers.
I know one of the best astrologers in the World and she’s full of shit, though one of my smartest relatives bought into her BS. And every time I expressed skepticism, she’d look into her book of stars and say “oh, yes, you sure are rational. Very very rational,” pretending it was the stars that were her telling her this. It was obvious she was making it up as she went along.
Astrologers have been predicting or saying that the USA is going through a radical transformation for a few years now — from Obama to Trump, so there’s a truth. What’s next, another civil war where they will be violence? It’s starting to happen.
The Wechsler would not have a g loading of 0.9+ if it was extremely unreliable
of course it would fucktard, but only when it’s administered by employees of the Psychological Corporation.
you should start reading books again peepee. apparently you can’t even read comments.
You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. If the WAIS were so unreliable, how do you explain the 0.88 correlation between identical twins raised together in the Bouchard study.
I took the SAT and bombed it because I was literally taught not a thing on it.
there’s no way to control for that, but that doesn’t matter, because all IQ tests are achievement tests. claims to the contrary are LIES by the test makers. psychologists have a vested interest in pretending that IQ is something innate and independent of life experience. the very idea of a “novel” test is ABSURD. it’s just a word. the very idea of “fluid intelligence” vs “crystallized intelligence” is also just a word game.
There’s some validity to the fluid vs crystallized distinction, but the problem is some of the tests once thought to measure only fluid ability (i.e. raven) turned out to measure a very subtle form of crystalized skill. Yes psychologists have a vested interest in promoting it, but all scientists have a vested interest in claiming their science is valid.
Supposedly fluid intelligence is independent from knowledge. It’s impossible. No there such thing. We already born with genotypical/instinctive impulses-“knowledge, just like a genetic memory. We born with it, with the capacity or not to learn certain knowledge level.
Supposedly fluid is non verbal and crystallized is verbal. Fluid is pattern recognition accessing the crystalized/internalized memory, including of course language/vocabulary knowledge.
In conclusion
It’s or seems impossible infer any analogy or association without some minimal knowledge and this knowledge-basis is the genotypical individual ceilling/pptential itself.
Or niet
^.^
Reaction norms is possible when you have a quite mutant species. Environmental genetic sensitivity or even entire dependence,literally speaking, from environment, just like plants or very diet restrict evolved species may be predisposed/genetic.
Some humans can be born with higher environmental sensitivity some of them in my opinion can be born with genetic disorders. Other human groups can be more straight on this aspect and be less environmentally sensitive. It’s dependent how environmentally sensible this individual or group can be. Based on this logic high mutational load like blacks would be the more environmentally sensible but
They have showed consistent common development even in quite good environments
Maybe It’s too early to conclude anything, insane afrophiles agree, 🙂 😉
in the Bouchard study.
BECAUSE THE SAME PERSON GAVE THE TEST.
DEAR GOD PEEPEE IS FUCKING RETARDED.
THE UNRELIABILITY IS ALL DOWN TO THE EXAMINER.
INDIVIDUAL EXAMINERS ARE RELIABLE.
FUCK!
TARD!
Are you sure the same person gave the test? What about identical twins raised apart correlating 0.7? Also same person?
of course i’m not sure, but bouchard had an interest in finding this high correlation. so my guess is he used the same person for each pair. or that the examiners knew the scores of one before testing the other.
maybe not. he may have claimed that the WAIS wasn’t subjective, so it didn’t matter.
but then maybe this explains why the Raven’s h^2 was so low, only .55…the Raven’s IS objective. it’s multiple choice right?
is the Mill-Hill objective or subjective?
it IS in part.
There are 88 different words which participants either have to- define all words, recognize the meanings of all words by choosing a correct synonym from six options and the last type which requires participants to define half of the words and choose synonyms for the rest.
What is MILL HILL VOCABULARY SCALE IMHV)? definition of MILL HILL VOCABULARY SCALE IMHV) (Psychology Dictionary)
the vocab was noted as one of the least reliable in the study i linked to, below. which is funny, because the Psychological Corporation claims it’s the most reliable.
Using the same psychologist to test both twins would create a huge bias. The gold standard is double blind research
Oops 😁
Lately I’ve been thinking…if black test scores are apparently getting closer to whites…
That means whites are getting further away from Jews.
The average Jew is getting dumber too. America has a lot of stupid people.
but not nearly as dumb as you JS.
astrology? seriously?
Yes, why not!
Many astrologers predicted Don Triunfo will become the next El Presidente de Disunidos.
Yes, JS.
So did the Book of Revelations (apparently);
“The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months.” (Revelations 13:5)
So….
Trump presidency will end in July 2020, Michael More is right that Trump won’t make it all the way through.
I’m an atheist but I got a huge kick out of this one 🙂
Or that Obama is the last president of the United States. This I do believe. America is finished as a nation. It’s now a disparate state of wah wah, wo wo, you you…If people were honest to say America is a just place for smart people to make money and spend it like drunken sailors while they can…. then America is just that, and with what’s going on, even more so…everything else is a distraction.
If you could create any law what would it be?
I would ban Zionist Jews from media: ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, Disney, Universal, Comcast, Univision, BBC, The Economist, NYT, WAPO, Universal Studios, Viacom…
Within 3 months people would see the amazing decline of America’s heartland.
Within 4, the Kinshasa Problem
Within 5, black men would disappear ads because they don’t buy anything and are just in there to normalise them
Within 6……
It would be the death knell of the ILLUSION.
my law would be a permanent trade and capital embargo on the anglo-sphere.
the english speaking peoples are the scourge of the planet.
America is the greatest country in the world.
Deal with it!
It’s the only country where a dumb person can get obscenely rich. The land of opportunity…
america is the shittiest developed country. next is the UK.
it’s the EXACT opposite of the “land of opportunity”.
canada and the nordic countries are the land of opportunity.
Palsgraf is a MORON.
deal with it!
Nordic countries are the land of opportunity for losers..
America is winner-take-all!
Losers = social harmony
Yesssss
Yet, America is atrocious for a nation. Ugly garbage everywhere. And Jews are clearly the winners, and everyone else a loser. They brainwashed you that a pile of dung is worth a piece of gold, and you buy it!
So why make America great again?? 😉
Yes the greatest but it’s not the best-head.
Every great civilization need some high culture. US have some high culture but it’s not near to the best humans already created instead there are great and unknown artists.
Santo – I gather you are being sarcastic. Brazil should be the America of the Latin America.
Yes, both are quite similar.
Meritocracy means everyone has the chance to “make it”.
It does not mean a stratified society on the basis of IQ.
Americans can “make it” if they want to.
Dude, just pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Do it!
what are you 5 years old?
the US is the opposite of a meritocracy fucktard. and the very idea of a meritocracy leaves ignores the issue of what “merit” means. “merit” is defined by the ruling class. so naturally it’s defined to mean whatever one needs to become a member of the ruling class. it’s retarded.
that’s another YUGE problem with america. “success” and “making it” are defined by how much money you make. if anyone wants to be rich so badly that he’s willing to work hard for it, this is exactly the sort of greedy delusional cunt who should never be rich.
other countries aren’t nearly as materialistic as the US. materialism or a strong desire to be rich is disgusting and prole!
lagom ar bast.
the law of jante.
look it up.
both candidates this time were truly prole.
The fact of the matter is that people who lose in America are losers. They are human trash, ie. garbage of society. The Japanese actually call their losers human trash. Losers always blame society and winners for their loss but this is not true!
America affords all some opportunity. Only some are able to seize their opportunity. Why? Because they’re mentally stronger!
What idiocy is it??
Paranoid people can be very awake about the enormous hypocrisy that shapes human interpersonal interactions. There is always twp types of diagnosable mental traits: Too healthy and too diseased. Or paranoia is the sign of mental disorder or is the sign of rationality but internalized and prioritized to the first order.
Cynical people tend to pretty indifferent to the social norms and generally they are very knowledgeable about human incongruences and just have fun with it. Cynicism also is a common approach of psychopaths. The same for cynicism. Or it’s a sign of mental and moral problems or a sign of intellectual greater mental health (wisdom).
“Losers” are not losing nothing of most of human societies and some them just make fun with it.
“Very few suckscesfull people are cynical”
Do you are retard??
Jesu$$$$ do céu!!!!
Who are the retard who wrote this diarrhea???
“Cynicism often is a sign of difficult life”
Because anti social personality tend to correlate positively with Lower income?? 😘
Astrological psychology
“Cynical people ARE like that.. They can accet it or ti”
Bullshitism.
Jews tend to be more cynical than gullies goyisches??
Durrrrrrr
Do you have read Paulo Coelho??
“Life is not gray, is good and bad and everything in the middle”
Oh shit
Nauseam und clichette
“Disastrous group strategy”
Evolutionary psychological conjectures are out of control.
Well the only group who are fully engaged in cynicism while collective strategy are hegemonic in western world this days….
So paranoia is exclusively a non white disease?? Huh?
“Land of free” is also the land of irresponsible. Everyone?? Psychos included?? Oh man!!!1
warren buffett is the rich guy that should be looked up to.
he drives an old car and lives in the same house he bought 60 years ago. he used to have a house in newport beach, but he sold it.
he made his fortune doing what he loves NOT striving!
buffett has CLASS!
definitely not an oprah mansion:
I bet Oprah loves what she does more than Buffet loves what he does.
Taking advantage of dumb white proles and get rich off it? I’d love that too.
Why not son??
Post hoc
Would you prefer living in the mansion and driving a nice car or living like a prole phaggot? What’s the point if you don’t spend money?
It’s useless! It’s paper!
Sometimes, what proles do makes more sense. Your notion of “class” is too rigid. Do your thing. Forget about class.
That you, Karl?
Read The Snowball
Buffet is severely autist.
His food can’t touch on the plate. He eats the same meal 60 nights in a row. He was obsessed with remembering and analysing licence plate numbers on cars as a child. He doesn’t do anything in his spare time except read industry data. His wife was sleeping around with other men for 20 years and she easily convinced him to let her live in San Fran with his money to give to friends, lovers and people she felt sorry for. She died of an STD. He of course, dresses like shit and is terrible with girls because he has no Theory of Mind. He asks his employees to do impossible thing. For example he asked his office secretary to organise the whole BK AGM with 30k people herself! He doesn’t know what he asks of people because he can’t relate.
He is not a good role model to follow in some ways. His children were neglected and his wife cucked him repeatedly. He wouldn’t have given any money to charity if not for his wife and Gates. He has no idea what he accumulated the money for even.
But he is a fair man and hard working though. And very passionate about his calling. And he improves the businesses and lives of people associated in a decent, ethical and fair manner. Closing factories and plants ruins him psychologically. He cares a lot about not disappointing investors either. And he can’t lie – he will tell them what financial engineering he’s doing and why even if he knows it disadvantages some investors.
I really enjoyed the way they look into how he broke into Wall Street under Ben Graham, who Buffet states was smarter than him. He states that Graham had a 200 IQ, but I doubt psychometrics is Buffet’s expertise.
Graham was a jew in a very WASP era of Wall Street back in the 50s and really wanted to hire only Jews because WASPS discriminated against him on his rise up, but Buffet was so brilliant he broke in as one of 3 apprentices. Graham had a love of the classics and literature, was a serial womaniser and couldn’t care less about money beyond a point. He sounds much more verbally blessed.
I would have liked to read a biography of Graham as well. Buffet’s book is a brilliant book not just on finance but history in America from the 1950s to modern day. Its unbelievable the stuff he’s been involved in – Watergate (WAPO board member), Civil Rights movement (through wife), being CEO of the old Goldman Sachs (Solomon Brothers), 2008 crisis, meeting various presidents etc. His Omaha local newspaper he bought even won a Pulitzer under his governance.
You learn a lot about different industry dynamics.
One of the best books I’ve read. Reaffirms Pumpkin’s views on intelligence and its many forms. Buffet also has a strange gift where he can force himself to suppress and completely forget something painful. Alice calls it his ‘bathtub trick’. Its not something I’ve heard autists being able to do. I would love something like that.
To be clear the world would be a lot better if all rich guys were like Buffet.
I eat the same foods and follow a set schedule. That doesn’t make me an autist, it makes me someone with goals who can t let himself be assed to worry about simple things such as eating and the like when u cab take control of my life and not worry about eating while focusing on the more important aspects of my life.
He eats hamburgers every night and drinks only coca cola. As a nutrition science aficionado, that’s worrying no?
Definitely is bad. Horrible actually. Coca-Cola is garbage, makes people fat easy calories. Kinda makes me wonder what other kinds of things he does. I wonder how healthy he is from eating all this garbage. I wonder what his blood markers look like. I wouldn’t think they’d look too good.
Point is, just because you’re a scheduled and regimented person doesn’t make you an autist. My day is planned out every day. I eat at the same times, have the same amount of spare time per day everyday for reading and blogging and stuff of that nature. It’s great not having to worry about random trivialities such as eating, and with my weekly 48 hour fast, I don’t think about food or eat and I get much more done.
If only these people who complained about not having enough time realized that intermittent fasting is the key to having more time they’d have a much higher quality of life.
Severely autistic people cannot live alone, period.
I agree with realist that sounds like someone with a bad case of OCD not an autist. Social incomprehension =/= autism
However if he is indeed ” a fair man and hard working though. And very passionate about his calling. And he improves the businesses and lives of people associated in a decent, ethical and fair manner. Closing factories and plants ruins him psychologically. He cares a lot about not disappointing investors either. And he can’t lie” Then he may just have a tendency to overestimate other’s around him. Which is a HFA symptom. “For example he asked his office secretary to organise the whole BK AGM with 30k people hersel”
Most of neurotypicals learn intuitively/automatically how to ”adapt” or to conform to the[se] society, autistics not, they tend to have it in the manual mode [on]…
they don’t born intuitively versed to the social [neurotypical] norms but they can learn quite well how to do it even there is a great usual distance between theory and practice.
https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class?utm_campaign=HBR&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Heideggerian astrology
😚
For me, class is a very conformist category. Proles like Lion obsess over it and make themselves miserable. What’s the point?
Finished reading Hitchens Arguably the other day.
Recommended reading.
His animal rights essay is great and he made me see another side to JFK. But his views on Iraq and Zion’s lebensraum plans more generally are daft.
Its the fact that he keeps being snide about anti-Iraq proponents 10 years after that makes me think he makes the worst error of intellect – refusing to say you were wrong based on pride.
Perhaps if he hadn’t sandbagged his opponents, it wouldn’t have been such an embarrassing comedown. As it stands, going to his grave defending WMD, phony UN resolutions and mushroom clouds really tarnishes his work and put’s him in there with the religious zealots he bashes throughout (which gets a bit old).
A brilliant mind. Let’s hope none of us make the same mistake wrt not admitting when we were wrong. Nothing wrong with being wrong.
it didn’t measure my WISC IQ peepee-tard. it was given by at least two different people. and i was 9 years old. and my high score was on the most g-loaded subtest.
i recall the digit span stopping even though i answered correctly.
stop LYING!
and give us an ADULT IQ score, not a 12 y old score done by a total incompetent.
and regarding what i assume was a soi-disant IQ test for TAG, i think TAG only required the top 5%.
Nineteen psychologists and 19 graduate students scored two Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition patient protocols. Mean IQs and indexes were similar across groups, but the ranges for Verbal IQ (VIQ), Performance IQ (PIQ), and Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) on one protocol were 25, 22, and 11 points, respectively. For both protocols taken together, percentages of agreement with the “actual” IQs for psychologists were only 26.3 for VIQ, 36.8 for PIQ, and 42.1 for FSIQ. For students, percentages were 15.8 for VIQ, 23.7 for PIQ, and 31.6 for FSIQ. The percentages of FSIQs that fell within ± 1 standard error of measurement of the actual IQs were 89.5 for psychologists and 76.3 for students. Scoring error also had a negative impact on index scores. Both groups were confident about their scoring accuracy.
http://asm.sagepub.com/content/10/2/151.short
If they went to the trouble of giving you mazes (an optional & time consuming test) then they administered all the major tests for calculating full-scale IQ
Perhaps they did not finish digit span since it’s an optional test so perhaps they only administered enough to rule out ADD
But I think that’s unlikely because you said you scored exactly average. So they just kept administering the test until you reached an exactly average score & then stopped, keeping score and administering the test simultaneously?
More likely is the whole test was given & you scored average inspite of correctly getting the last item because you missed many easier sequences due to executive dysfunction
Yes you were only 9, and it’s possible certain high IQ genes emerge post-puberty. You said you suddenly got very good at math at 11
Your parents must have the score report. Go get it
No exist IQ paper test genes
You mean intelligence
Yes some “gifted” subgroups have delayed development and usually asymmetrical.
my parents don’t have it.
the psychologists said i was a “gifted underachiever”.
what’s “gifted”?
they were never given a score report. they just met with the psychologist one evening.
A major point of consensus among all scholars of intellectual giftedness is that there is no generally agreed definition of giftedness.[91] Although there is no scholarly agreement about identifying gifted learners, there is a de-facto reliance on IQ scores for identifying participants in school gifted education programs. In practice, many school districts in the United States use an IQ score of 130, including about the upper 2 or 3 percent of the national population, as a cut-off score for inclusion in school gifted programs.
that, plus you can add 11 points of error to my score on the WISC at age 9.
thus >= 141.
and you can subtract at least 20 points of error from peepee’s PIQ and VIQ. giving an IQ at or below average on the WISC at age 12.
actually i meant add 22 points to my minimum score as the test was administered by at least two different people.
WISC FSIQ >= 152 at age 12, thus coinciding with my ADULT IQ scores.
i assume peepee’s test was given by one (incompetent) person.
Good lord you completely misunderstood the study you cited and have no idea what a margin of error is.
Or you’re just trolling
And assuming your average WISC subtest score was in between your best & worst score, your IQ was at most about 125 after adjusting for old norms. But schools did not become Flynn aware until relatively recently so you were probably misidentified as gifted
Generally giftedness is the “very” above average psycho cognitive skills of any kind. Artistic giftedness require less higher IQ/ higher general knowledge. Mathematical giftedness’ seems the most IQ dependent. Scientific too. I thought if philosophical giftedness require intermediary averages IQ between mathematical/scientific and artistic.
Higher IQ seems reflect higher general knowledge, not necessarily cultural.
Giftedness can be more specialized or more broader but generally gifted people tend to be more specialized, asymmetrical cognitive profiles than symmetric. Well it’s what I have read.
Giftedness also can manifest in psychological ways. We can say for example that a high functioning psychopaths are psychological gifted dark triad people.
after adjusting for old norms.
you don’t know when i took the test FUCTARD.
and my low score was NOT a score. as i’ve said 100x.
and you CAN’T know what a score is based on high and LOW.
STOP LYING PEEPEE-TARD.
LET’S PROVE PEEPEE IS A COMPULSIVE LIAR…
AND RETARDED.
EVEN IF MY “LOW SCORE” HAD ACTUALLY BEEN A SCORE, THE DIGIT SPAN HAS THE LOWEST CORRELATION WITH FSIQ OF ANY SUBTEST.
A DIGIT SPAN OF 10 AND AN IQ OF 150 IS NOT AT ALL UNEXPECTED.
MY SUGGESTION PEEPEE:
1. TAKE A REAL IQ TEST.
2. INCREASE YOUR SCORE BY AT LEAST 80 POINTS.
3. UNTIL THEN STOP BLOGGING.
4. GO TO A PSYCHIATRIST TO DIAGNOSE YOU WITH AUTISM AND COMPULSIVE LYING.
THE DIGIT SPAN SAYS BASICALLY NOTHING ABOUT FSIQ. THE ONLY REASON IT’S EVEN PART OF THE TEST IS TO DIAGNOSE ADD.
You’ve stated you were tested at nine and that you were born after The Exorcist, thus old norms
You get diagnosed with schizophrenia & alcohol induced dementia cause you’re too dumb to remember what you’ve said
LET US DEMONSTRATE THIS AGAIN FOR MATH CHALLENGED PEEPEE- TARD. SHALL WE?
1. THE HIGHER THE FSIQ THE GREATER THE SPREAD IN SCORES.
2. THIS MEANS THAT THE REGRESSION ON ANY ONE SUBTEST IS WHAT IS CALLED HETEROSCEDASTIC.
3. THE PROBABILITY WITHOUT HETEROSCEDASTICITY THAT ONE WOULD SCORE 145 YET SCORE 100 ON THE DIGIT SPAN IS STILL 20% THE CHANCE THAT ONE WOULD SCORE 145 GIVEN NO INFORMATION. GIVEN THAN ONE SCORES A 19 ON THE MOST FSIQ CORRELATED SUBTEST AND THAT DIGIT SPAN IS HIS LOWEST SCORE AND GIVEN HETEROSCADISTICTY THE ODDS AREN’T LONG ST ALL.
YET PEEPEE KEEPS LYING:
1. THAT I ACTUALLY SCORED 100 ON DIGIT SPAN. I DIDN’T.
2. THAT NO ONE WITH AN IQ ABOVE 125 EVER HAS A LOW SCORE AT 100. WHICH THEY DO ALL THE TIME.
PEEPEE IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW HIGH IQ SOCIETIES ARE POPULATED EXCLUSIVELY BY PEOPLE WITH LOW IQs. SOMETIMES, AS IN PEEPEE’S CASE, EXTREMELY LOW.
You are as dumb as they come.
A person’s subtest scores tend to be normally distributed, so your average subtest score was likely midway between your highest and lowest.
You’re making it WAY more complicated than it is, as all stupid people do.
YOU GET DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM FOR REMEMBERING EVERYTHING I’VE SAID, AND…
BELIEVING IT!
YOU GET DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM FOR REMEMBERING EVERYTHING I’VE SAID, AND…
BELIEVING IT!
So you admit all your bragging was a lie. Finally.
dec 1973 + 9 = dec 1982, vs 1997 when the WAIS-III comes out.
that’s a range.
i’ll try to find more REAL score reports (unlike yours) to show you that being gifted and scoring 10 on at least one subtest is THE NORM.
but for all i know, my digit span wasn’t even used.
here’s the full text:
They found that students who administered the WAIS-R on five occasions
made more errors on the fifth examination than they did on
the first…
Each protocol contained the exact responses of the
examinees as well as response times and other data neces-
sary for scoring 13 subtests and obtaining the three IQs,
four indexes, and two incidental memory scores…
From the files of the first author, protocols of one male
and one female patient were randomly selected…
The findings of this investigation are consistent with
the literature (e.g., Franklin et al., 1982; Ryan et al., 1983;
Slate & Jones, 1990b) because they indicate that regard-
less of one’s experience level with the Wechsler scales,
scoring errors occur frequently and detract from the accu-
racy of WAIS-III IQs and indexes…
However, in the study
by Ryan et al., psychologists and students achieved similar
levels of scoring accuracy on the Verbal Scale but differed
significantly in terms of scoring variability on the Perfor-
mance Scale, with psychologists demonstrating signifi-
cantly more variability than students…
suggest that an examiner’s experience level is
not of critical importance when it comes to scoring accu-
racy on the Wechsler scales (Kaufman, 1990)…
The present findings indicate that both psychologists
and students demonstrated considerable variability in
scoring the WAIS-III. This is particularly troublesome be-
cause both groups were confident that they had scored the
protocols accurately…
Moreover, the participants
were volunteers who had completed formal training in in-
dividual intelligence testing….
If these assumptions are accurate, the present results are
consistent with Kaufman’s (1990) assertion that scoring
errors are an unfortunate built-in aspect of individual
assessment…
The WAIS-III Administration and Scoring Manual
(Wechsler, 1997) represents a significant improvement
over its predecessors, the WAIS and WAIS-R, because it
presents expanded instructions for examiners along with
increased numbers of examples on how to score individual
items. Nevertheless, it appears that these improvements…
had little impact on the accuracy of scores produced by the
present samples of students and practitioners…
ETC.
ETC.
ETC.
TAKE THE SAT PEEPEE!
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10713444_Scoring_reliability_on_the_Wechsler_Adult_Intelligence_Scale-Third_Edition_WAIS-III
http://m.nautil.us/blog/epigenetics-has-become-dangerously-fashionable
” I like “animal ‘research’ ”
A psychopath or morally idiotic.
Most of this studies are done to
Find a cure of genetic diseases
Compare humans with non human animals
And…
WISE eugenics is morally correct because without harmful mutations this research Don’t need to be done. All stupid justifications to hurt and kill thousand of non human animals even our evolutionary cousins are ceased.
Non human animals may be similar with human biology but they are not identical.
“Ethical” in “$cience” = bad joke.
A lot of retarded study made by MEDIOCRE smartASS, those who are “data-driven” = dependent, unable to think novel-correctly about the subject they are dealing, just pathetic!
Hbd mythology about how purrfekt “smart people” can be… Most of them? No way.
What do you think the avg IQ of the cities and countries with the highest % of millionaires??
1- Monaco
2- Genève
3- Zürich
We need animal testing.
We go use you thought
I will repeat for you short memory
You’re retarded Guido
“we need euphemism”animal research” ”
You need nothing, even “scientist” you are white trash!
Stop talking as if you were representant of “scientific community”.
It’s absolute waste of time and patience talking every Philosophical stuff with you in the height of your megalomaniacal lunacy.
I no have doubt the percent of extremely necessary evil use of non human animals in “research” is much lower than many or most of “scientists” believe or say.
I don’t talk as if I’m a representative of the scientific community. We test things in animals that are similar to humans for a reason. Whether it is products, medicine, etc. Feelosophy is useless, philosophy is dead.
Let’s take Santo’s advice and not test new things on animals and directly ship for human use. Let’s see how far that gets us.
I love eating cows and chickens too. So good!
Thanks for the racist jab!!
“Animal research” masquerade mediocrity or lack of character.
Yes, because I want more discoveries and animals are the only way to test these things, that means I have a lack of character.
Let’s not test things on animals and just put it right out to humans, how far will that get us, Santo?
Kill subhumans will be a spectacular sports in the near future. Tale care.
You pretend to be scientist but you are a pseudo nutritionist, lol.
Unfortunately is extremely difficult show to the mentally challenged as you how dumb you/he is. Would be delightful to see the face of fool looking for their real abject aspect/reality.
You have a little and peripheral blog that hbd elite rarely pay attention. Your amazing insights seems are not so amazing as you are “thinking” Guido. The differences between a average Joey and you is that you think you’re a not a average Joey, period. Trans- cognitive.
The fool who want to be clever.
Transgender
Transcognitive O_O
You play safe all the time. You’re like libertarianism. The worst of the left and the worst of the right. Or like hybrid socio economic system in China. You’re a combination of the worst of the worlds.
Most commenters here are quite narcissists.
Generally commenters tend to be more narcissist than only-readers.
You confuse all the time your abject boring common sense personal opinions with arguments, with their developments.
” WE need blabksabla”
….because
Arguments start with because’s.
You lack character self knowledge and rationality anyway…
Before to say shit 💩 as usual just study what you are vomiting here as if it were the pale truth, whatever it mean, 😉
Many evil research are about obvious subjects that intellectually lazy scientists can’t improve without “scientific method”, “data-dependent” semi robot and hate-working classes glasses”geniuses”.
Smoke cause cancer?
We have some people here. All of them smoked too much during their lives.
Many of them become cancer-sick. But not all of them. And some of them have healthier respiratory vias.
Causality (all people who smoke become cancer-sick)
Correlation (many smokers become cancer-sick but not all of them)
Common lazy autistic-typo
You don’t need use monkeys…
USE them
To understand if smoke is causal or correlative to the cancer
Many evil research is about frivolous feminine habits as COSMETICS.
To the bitches deceive themselves they are more beautiful but they are looking like a clown.
As usual, a whole slew of personal attacks from you not addressing what I said. What’s with the racism? I’ve not said any racial epithet towards you, you’re triggering me.
I don’t care to waste my time going through the spew you just gave me, just wanted to clarify this:
“Arguments start with because’s.”
Arguments start with IF and have THEN in them. Take a basic introduction to logic class and you’ll see that you have no real idea what an actual argument is. I gave a sound, logical argument on progressive evolution. That’s an argument. Where the premises are true and the conclusion is sound.
Learn about what you’re talking about before you say it. You’ve no idea what an argument really is.
Scientific greedy and anxiety
There is a subject
“only” “animal abuse” can help the researchers in SHORT TERM
They are pressured to show results,
This is the pragmatic/easy way/path, supposedly, to produce some academic “achievements”,
They want quick recognizance.
Low reasoning
Joke “scientific ethics”
Prove ethics is a real thing and not a human construct.
White trash?? Guido??
Awnn
He say all abaurda with straight face and now he is triggered…
I’m beginning to like… It’s sound good
If Don’t want to be humiliated and or wasting your precious time with me so just to stop to counter “argue” with me. It’s simple.
Oh my good the same play safe and wrong play safe
Jesus where you are right now???
Arguments start with if???
Nope your guidogoy
Personal opinions
I believe America is not Europe
(more than a half of your …argment)
Argument
Because America is not the same continent than Europe and because blabkablabla
“We ‘need’ “animal research” ”
Personal opinion
Poor pr proto trying of semantic manipulation
“arguments start with if or then”… Or because… And specially because
Because generally people start their argumentations with personal opinions of point of views so they defend them === arguments.
If is
If
Then
Or
Because
Don’t matter too much
Even because seems more essential initial
What matter is that you are again and again and again deviating the subject here.
You showed all mediocre ticks as usually medio people show when they need burn some extra neurons to think
One of the great example of lower intellectual skills is the self contradiction
Generally self contradiction is the manifestation of short memory, lack of self mirror/knowledge, factual understanding and lack of internal coherence.
All the time you are fooling yourself when you insist that morality is in the eyes of beholder and criticize morally the behavior for example of Jews.
If morality is absolutely subjective what the hell you think your morality is superior than others??
Normie and avg Joeys and specially slightly above avg people are very susceptible to commit this basic thinking mistakes.
You are a great example of how avg ones tend to think and their operational inconsistencies.
Nope, I’m telling you how to logically structure an argument and you’re saying I’m wrong when you don’t even know what I’m talking about. Blah blah blah. All your opinion about me.
I don’t use the term “superior” when talking about things like that as it’s not quantifiable.
I truly thank you for these kind words. I really appreciate it. However this has no bearing on my career or what I do in the real world buddy.
http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SocialConstruction/Logic.html
I’ve given you this link before, you didn’t read it. Arguments start with premises, the premises need to be true and then the conclusion needs to follow the premises for a sound argument. That’s what you don’t understand.
Not responding to your spew about me. Better things to do with my time. You can waste your time writing it, I’m not going to read it.
Arguments start with “if”, if you had any grasp on basic logic, you’d understand this one simple point.
We’re talking about ethics in animal testing, not your opinion about me.
So Santoculto, what do you propose we do tests on before they’re mass produced for human use?
You’re basically trying to say that your “morally superior” because you don’t eat meat and any and all testing on animals is wrong because things. You choose to not eat meat. Cool. I respect that. But don’t think you’re morally superior to meat eaters just because you don’t eat meat. This not even wrong, it’s horribly wrong.
Keep your moral views on food to yourself, no one really cares what hippy tree huggers say about meat consumption.
And it’s more meat for us meat eaters anyway, so thanks for bit eating meat buddy.
You’re a child
And need to be treated like that
I respect children but she don’t give the respect for life because she is immature. Children need to be guided at least.
I don’t think I’m not just morally superior than you
I’m
It’s a baisc fact.
All the time you show this reality.
Show me someone who already die because lack of meat consume.
Again and again and again and again and again
It’s not the “meat”
It’s the protein
All the time
It’s absolutely possible substitute “meat” work other sources of protein. You and most of sub humans can’t do it because their sub humanity, very simple to understand.
“I don’t think I’m not just morally superior than you
I’m”
That’s cute. Now define it.
“It’s absolutely possible substitute “meat” work other sources of protein. You and most of sub humans can’t do it because their sub humanity, very simple to understand.”
….wait…. You’re telling ME that I don’t UNDERSTAND something that’s basic in what I do in my day-to-day life? Hilarious!
Buddy, let me tell you. I’ve worked with tons of people who were nutrient deficient due to garbage vegan/vegetarian diets. I’m sure I know how to structure a diet and to have people be healthy, no matter what diet they choose.
Keep talking out of your ass.
Substitute
Replace
You’re miserable subhuman who don’t have any miserable idea you’re supposedly arguing… Your first “answer” just showed how avg boring and playing dumb in spontaneous way you are. It’s incredible!!!!!!
Define what???/???
So my beautiful derriere is smarter than your little brain.
Define “moral superiority”.
Tell me I don’t know you can substitute meat protein with plant protein (which has less essential amino acids), I want to laugh again.
Almost of retarded nutritionists have the same common sense opinions about vegetarian diets. And almost of them are wrong as usual among boring smartchos.
Obviously you again don’t really argue about it. You have the opportunity to (pseudo) win this debate because I’m not a specialized or”specialized” in this subject but there are many vegetarian and vegan expers who are more knowledgeable about it.
I ALREADY argued about the deficiencies in this type of diets but I thought your absence of long term memory prevent you to remember this detail. Obvious too.
Its funny and revolting you advertising me to learn with miss vos savant how to debate while you are all the fucking time comiting all of the basic mistakes.
Jews want replace terroni with Africans in mexzogiorno.
You think it’s morally wrong/inferior.
Re
Tar
De
T
http://ruhlman.com/2012/05/why-its-ethical-to-eat-meat/
“Almost of retarded nutritionists have the same common sense opinions about vegetarian diets. And almost of them are wrong as usual among boring smartchos.”
“Nutritionists are wrong.”
Got it. Cept that’s not an argument pal.
“Obviously you again don’t really argue about it. You have the opportunity to (pseudo) win this debate because I’m not a specialized or”specialized” in this subject but there are many vegetarian and vegan expers who are more knowledgeable about it.”
Quote them then. I’m well versed on nutrition and what different macros and micros do in the body. ANY diet is good, so long as you hit your macros and micros. WHICH vegans/vegetarians don’t know how to do because, and for lack of a better word, most people are nutritionally retarded so they come to me to learn.
“Jews want replace terroni with Africans in mexzogiorno.
You think it’s morally wrong/inferior.”
Italy is pushing back, Italians—mostly Southern Italians—are extremely ‘racist’ (whatever that means), so I’m not too worried about it.
Even then, if all populations were to get wiped off the map, oh well. Evolution, natural selection in action. I look at things through an evolutionary and science lens, not a lens of ‘feelz’.
In other words you are admiring you are a robot without any emotions unusual to the terroni.
Nooooooooo Guido I will not read your retarded nutrollogue friends if I just talked about them in the last comment. Earth planet calling… Earth planet calling…
Personal
Training
Opinions
I give a fuck to their primitive mind believe
You all the time no develop your personal opinions and the few times you did well ot was not good. Too much mystery for the misery.
Someone die of vegetarianism??? Search for them if you want.
I imagined a ugly pseudo muscle with a long haired creature walking in Jersey city.
I love people who are objective, direct, honest, coherent with the purpose of the debates.
That morroni tell me to define a sentence, ao he change and tell me again to define moral superiority. So I give for him the best counter arrgmenf a adversary could provide and
Deviate to the confrontation.
I look for reality via evolutionary eyes
HUAHIAHUAHUHUAHHAHUAHUAHUHAUAHUHAUHUAHUAHUHAUUA
Poor morroni child
Razib is laughing 😆 of you your beast
As usual, nothing serious said.
So emotions are divorced from evolution?? Nope.
A defective robot justifying their own mentally problems.
RR is saying in loud and clear sound
“Kindness is not a thing. Compassion is bullshit”
Don’t forget this.
Emotions underlying all the path of evolution, to care babies, to love, to cooperate and
To understand the reality.
Man what the fuck serios you said here??? Nothing.
Your pathetic psychological and cognitive reality is factually serious.
Putting values on something doesn’t doesn’t make something “a thing”. You’re reifying these things, trying to make it a material thing.
“A defective robot justifying their own mentally problems.”
No mental problems here. You say that because I believe that morality and moral reasoning are products of evolution.
“RR is saying in loud and clear sound
“Kindness is not a thing. Compassion is bullshit””
Do you not realize that wanting to achieve things in life is only to get more status so you can attempt to reproduce your ‘selfish genes’? Being kind to someone is helping yourself, in the long run. I look at things from the gene’s perspective. The gene wants to reproduce copies of itself, whether it’s you having children, or taking care of genetically similar others, to sacrificing your life for your family member or genetically similar other. I do say that kindness is not a ‘thing’, because it isn’t. But those two emotions arise because the gene itself is in danger of dying. How about you understand where I’m coming from before you start putting words in my mouth.
“Emotions underlying all the path of evolution, to care babies, to love, to cooperate and”
It’s one of the reasons why we have bigger brains and are more helpless when we’re younger when other animals can be somewhat self-sufficient immediately after birth.
“Man what the fuck serios you said here??? Nothing.”
>getting this mad
>over the internet
Understand where I’m coming from and get back to me, because it’s clear you don’t.
Coward, quintessentially dumb ( lack of self awareness), cynical, liar, contradictory and evil….
Ladies and gentlemen
Morroni “RR”
There is only two types of mental health
First: Epicentrically healthier in the brain functioning and physiology
Second: Epicentrically healthier in the thinking the more real g loading cognitive activities of all..
showing this mental health via rationality and specially wisdom
Many or most people are the first but the fact they have healthy brains don’t mean they are gifted or brilliant.
Few and special ones are extrinsically mental healthier.
You can cut a lot more time for yourself not writing your nonsense about me. What does what you think about me have to do with this conversation? It’s about eating meat and you trying to make emotions ‘things’.
“There is only two types of mental health”
Says who?
Morality have everything with people your retarded.
You’re pathetic. Fooling yourself since you decide jump to the hbd train.
It’s sterile try to debate any fucking shit with you because you are never objective, never try to refute point by point why??? Because you know in your inner self you’re incapable to refute directly and still be alive.
All the time…….
Almost of the retarded avg of all magnitudes genuine smart people need to deal at daily basis are being well represented by morroni Guido here.
We just try play fair and this masses confuse lies and self deception with refutations.
Define non morali superiority….
Almost of the leftist has tried to counter argue about evolution has been proved or wrong or exaggerated or misunderstood.
epigenetics for example
The relativism of evolution is only by dummies instead this perspective have their grain of truths.
” immigration TSUNAMI to the France is unlikely to cause that dysgenic effects… Maybe nutrition ??? Huhu???”
I don’t know if you remember IT. Ot was what you said when we are debating (or trying) about France immigration and intelligence. After years studying about this matter you say it is embarrassing, to be polite now.
Buona notte morronni
More than half of your comment could be excised and no context would be lost.
“Almost of the leftist has tried to counter argue about evolution has been proved or wrong or exaggerated or misunderstood.”
I’m not a leftist and I don’t say this.
“” immigration TSUNAMI to the France is unlikely to cause that dysgenic effects… Maybe nutrition ??? Huhu???””
Not at the current point in time.
“I don’t know if you remember IT. Ot was what you said when we are debating (or trying) about France immigration and intelligence. After years studying about this matter you say it is embarrassing, to be polite now.”
?
Human construct is a thing you lr complete imbecile.
You can’t reify things and make things ‘things’.
“Animal research” is a human construct??
Man, you deserve to be sterilized. I hope you don’t think you’re candidate to any eugenic policy.
Mono mrronni Guido
Compete absence of all qualities that make a individual special
This is you
Ciao ciao ciao
You’re revolting
Seriously
Sure thing dude.
You no have fucking idea you’re talking about. Look for your comments and try to reflect/ to behave like a modem human at least one time in your life. No any development of your personal opinions, you just repeat monosyllabically speaking. Any insight, any originality. You defend factually wrong or incomplete point of views or factoids and no have even the capacity to argue, so called mental gymnastics.
“No any development of your personal opinions,”
Lol
“you just repeat monosyllabically speaking”
Lol
“Any insight, any originality.”
Lol
“You defend factually wrong or incomplete point of views or factoids ”
Lol source?
“no have even the capacity to argue”
I know how to structure sound arguments with a true premises with a conclusion that follows the premises. Tell me I don’t know how to argue.
“so called mental gymnastics.”
Lol
My factual analysis about your white trashism is relevant. It’s not only rootless insults.
To the GOOD LISTENER half word is enough
Not for you
Real smart people use their real extra neurons to work in many hypothesis and scenarios before to “play safe” and disgrace the health of hundred animals and many times for nothing without any substantial result.
My example of smoke habit and cancer correlation is very elucidative.
I thought I don’t need explain again
Very simple to understand, disgustingly simple. Before torture and kill animals to the well of science just try to think more if you want.
Because vague meritocratic filter to the academia (we see at least 50% of politically moronic thinkers in “academia”) many non ideal people has joined to the researchers and teachers university body.
To start to see some real long term sustainable social economic and scientific progress”see” need to put the ideally correct people in their places and throughout out all of the unethical types and also lunatic ones.
this is what bouchard claims:
To avoid examiner bias, we administer the WAIS simultaneously to the twins
in different rooms by professional psychometrists.
so if true this means the correlations for both MZAs and MZTs should be a little higher.
but then i found this regarding this study:
Nevertheless, based on the incomplete and unanalyzed DZA IQ correlations that have been published, there does not appear to be a statistically significant difference between the MISTRA MZA and DZA groups on either the Wechsler (WAIS) IQ test (MZA correlation = .62, versus DZA = .50), or the Raven Progressive Matrices IQ test (MZA correlation =.55, versus DZA = .42). The failure to find a significant difference between the MZA and DZA groups runs counter to genetic predictions and theories, and suggests that environmental factors alone account for both the MZA and the DZA above-zero IQ correlations.
Relevant:
Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: The FLynn effect and the future of intelligence
•Experts on intelligence research were asked about past and future IQ development.
•FLynn effect was explained by better health, nutrition, education, living standard.
•A possible FLynn effect end was explained by asymmetric fertility and migration.
•For the 21st century, experts expect IQ increases in low-ability regions (+ 6 IQ).
•For the West, experts expect a stagnation or a decline in IQ (US: − 0.45 IQ).
“Experts on intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement were surveyed for their opinions on the causes of the 20th century rise in intelligence test results called the “FLynn effect”, on the causes of a possible end of the FLynn effect and on the future development of IQ in different world regions. Ratings from N = 75 experts attributed the secular IQ rise to better health and nutrition, more and better education and rising standards of living. Genetic changes were seen as not important. A possible stagnation or retrograde of the FLynn effect was attributed to asymmetric fertility (genetic and socialization effects), migration, declines in education and the influence of media. Experts expected 21st century IQ increases in currently on average low-ability regions (+ 6 to + 7 IQ points, in Latin America, Africa, India) and in East Asia (+ 7 IQ), but not in the West (a stagnation, below + 1 IQ), with a small decline in the US (− 0.45 IQ). Similar results were obtained for all experts and experts on the FLynn effect itself (mean r = 0.90 to 0.97; N = 17). The results correlated strongly with and confirmed a recent meta-analysis on the causes of the FLynn effect (r = 0.65 to 0.71; Pietschnig & Voracek, 2015).”
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916310984
Full paper is available, hurry and read it before it’s not available anymore.
Very alt right take from the psychologists on cause of Flynn stagnation – “migration, declines in education (which is contraindicated with migration if you think about it) and influence of media”.
The science supports alt right HBD.
The only thing they had to ask was ‘who is the media’.
IS THIS REAL? OH YEAH! IT IS! AND WAS SUPER EASY TO FIND TOO!
AS YOU CAN SEE FOR THIS 9 YEAR OLD…
1. FSIQ = 131.
2. HAS TWO SCORES OF 10!
PEEPEE IS SO FUCKING EASY TO BEAT INTELLECTUALLY IT’S SAD!
NATURALLY SHE’LL WANT TO DEFLATE THESE SCORES BY THE FLYNN EFFECT.
BUT IT DOESN’T MATTER.
PEEPEE IS RETARDED.
AND WHAT ELSE?
OH YEAH!
THE HIGH SCORE IS ONLY 18! NOT 19! ON SIMILARITIES!
http://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2009/06/04/2982/
AND THE COUP DE GRAS FOR PEEPEE THE LYING RETARD?
DIGIT SPAN IS LEFT OFF!
BUH DUM BUM CHING!
I AM NOT THIS GUY.
SO ALL I HAD TO DO WAS TYPE IN “WISC IQ SCORE REPORT INTO GOOGLE. THEN I CLICKED IMAGES. AND VOILA. THE VERY FIRST ONE I FOUND.
PEEPEE IS ONCE AGAIN SHOWN TO BE:
1. A COMPULSIVE LIAR.
2. RETARDED.
Good lord you’re stupid. That WISC-R scores proves EXACTLY my point.
Averaging the kid’s highest subtest score (Similarities 18), with his low WISC-R score (Coding 10), gives 14, an excellent proxy for his average on all ten subtests (14.2)
You’ve been hung by your own rope.
In other, more serious news PP, what do you think about the paper that just came out today on the FLynn effect?
GOOD LORD YOU’RE LYING AGAIN PEEPEE.
FSIQ = 131.
HIGH SCORE 18
LOW SCORE 10.
131 > 125!
I estimated your score to be around 125 AFTER converting to white norms and adjusting for the Flynn effect.
Haven’t seen it yet
EXCELLENT PROXY VS
IMPOSSIBLE YOU SCORED HIGHER THAN THE EXCELLENT PROXY.
NOT THE SAME THING!
OBVIOUS TO ALL NON-RETARDED PEOPLE.
GO TO THE PSYCHIATRIST NOW PEEPEE!
EXCELLENT PROXY VS
IMPOSSIBLE YOU SCORED HIGHER THAN THE EXCELLENT PROXY.
NOT THE SAME THING!
Anything’s possible you moron, but all we have to go one is your highest and lowest score, and I gave you the benefit of the doubt but I assuming your highest score was the maximum. If anything I probably erred on the high side.
DIGIT SPAN IS LEFT OFF!
BUH DUM BUM CHING!
Yes I know Digit Span is left off. I’m the one who told you it was an optional test along with Mazes, dumb-dumb. But by averaging your highest and lowest scores (regardless of whether they were used) gives a proxy for your AVERAGE level of intellectual functioning, which the full-scale IQ reflects.
BUT YOU NEVER SAID AVERAGE PEEPEE.
YOU HAVE REPEATEDLY SAID THAT A SCORE HIGHER THAN THIS PROXY IS IMPOSSIBLE.
DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHEN YOU’RE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF?
OR ARE YOU JUST DOUBLING DOWN ON LYING?
YOU HAVE REPEATEDLY SAID THAT A SCORE HIGHER THAN THIS PROXY IS IMPOSSIBLE.
I’ve never said or even implied that. You just have impaired reading comprehension.
YOU’VE SAID IT TODAY.
SO EITHER YOU HAVE NO MEMORY OR YOU’RE LYING AGAIN!
Link to my comment where I said it, if you’re not too stupid to figure out how to link to comments.
I WAS ONLY HALF TROLLING PEEPEE, BUT YOU’RE SO AUTISTIC YOU DIDN’T GET THE JOKE.
I DIDN’T MEAN “ERROR” IN THE SENSE OF A CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OR ANYTHING MATHEMATICALLY PRECISE.
I WAS JUST STATING A REMOTE OUTLANDISH POSSIBILITY.
THAT YOU GOT VERY VERY LUCKY AND I GOT VERY UNLUCKY.
…
BUT FROM THE DATA GIVEN A RANGE OF 11 POINTS FOR A SAMPLE OF 38 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATE OF THE “STANDARD ERROR” ASSUMING IT HAS A NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
THAT’S AN INTERESTING QUESTION.
CAN YOU FIGURE IT OUT?
OR IS IT TOO HARD FOR YOU PEEPEE?
I WAS ONLY HALF TROLLING PEEPEE, BUT YOU’RE SO AUTISTIC YOU DIDN’T GET THE JOKE.
I DIDN’T MEAN “ERROR” IN THE SENSE OF A CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OR ANYTHING MATHEMATICALLY PRECISE.
I WAS JUST STATING A REMOTE OUTLANDISH POSSIBILITY.
THAT YOU GOT VERY VERY LUCKY AND I GOT VERY UNLUCKY.
.
Oh thanks for explaining the joke. A real knee slapper.
Pumpkinperson
how many articles actually suffered the purge? and have they all been restored?
Hardly anything was permanently purged.
and the second question? the ones that got purged like the Aborigine article–will they get restored?
here it is in the form you want peepee-tard.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/11/13/the-black-white-gap-has-dramatically-shrunk-on-scholastic-tests-but-not-on-official-iq-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-38045
dear lord you need cock!
Did you even read the comment? I in no way implied it was IMPOSSIBLE to have a WISC IQ above 125 given your highest and lowest score, I explicitly said assuming your average WISC subtest score was in between your best & worst score, your IQ was at most about 125 after adjusting for old norms.
What a complete utter waste of time you are.
just more lies and retardation from peepee.
do you know what “at most” MEANS?
do you even know what “in between” MEANS?
DEAR GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING…
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB!
do you know what “at most” MEANS?
Now we know for sure that your low Digit Span score was indeed valid. You don’t have the working memory to remember the first part of my sentence while thinking about the second part. What I said was “assuming your average WISC subtest score was in between your best & worst score, your IQ was at most about 125 after adjusting for old norms.”
Now in your defence (and God knows you need one), I should have said “mid-way between” but it’s obvious I meant that from the fact that I’ve explained to you my calculation repeatedly and from the fact that I said “assuming” (as you’ve noted, all averages are in between the highest and lowest scores, so the only thing requiring assumption is a SYMETRICAL distribution).
exactly^^^
a symmetrical distribution has no “at most” at its center point peepee-tard.
misdreavus was right.
you’re just fucking retarded.
and destructure was right.
you’re a chink.
your parents weren’t even born in canada.
a symmetrical distribution has no “at most” at its center point peepee-tard.
But if your mean scaled score was midway between your two putative extremes, your IQ was at most about 125 (white norms adjusted for inflation)
When I discovered what a scaled score was I was surprised. I thought I had average scores but it turns out they were really high.
I noticed that when I did the reaction test I got 255 ms of 20 trials.
https://brainsize.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/calculating-your-reaction-time-iq-using-a-user-friendly-reaction-time-test/
I think I would do better but I feel muggy all the time. 3 times I scored 235 ms. I think that I am sick because I don’t eat right or exercise and I have depression. There have been times when I could read really fast but I feel tired all the time. I slow down when I try to understand what is being said. When I don’t “think” about it I read faster. Often what I read brings up associations I try to use to create my own ideas. Having separate thoughts from the material is why I can’t focus.
I do have a g of 130 on the wais 4 and I was in a gifted program. If g is related to neuron speed then my energy levels could be affecting them. I don’t do anything all day and I sleep too much because I am bored. And the rest of the time I feel overwhelmed. When I don’t have my own ideas I don’t know what to do. So I read blogs and forums. I only think fast when my mind is clear and that is very rare. I hold my emotions inside and I feel really slow.
Illuminati has severe autism.
People with autism have no verbal intelligence.
Or ‘theoretical common sense’ as it will come to be known.
Not that being autistic means Illuminati is a bad person. Quite the opposite as I’ve continually stated.
In fairness, a lot of people really enjoy Illuminati’s posts and look forward to them! This blog would not be as good without him.
Do you have severe autism Ilumicat?
Illuminicat does have autism, he’s said as much.
“People with autism have no verbal intelligence.”
Brilliant.
Philosopher is a prodigy. A real intellect. Once in a generation.
So we can now to say that ”aspergers is out of ‘the spectrum’ ”
😉
”Philosopher is a prodigy. A real intellect. Once in a generation.”
I agree, he is brilliant, not in the Oprah levels but, well, he identified my hidden and self-unknown autistic nature.
I asked if Iliumicat have SEVERE autism….
I think a lot of East Asians are on Lion’s blog in addition to this one, and also along his blog roll. Some of them pose as White Nationalists who dislike other minorities.
And I can tell you some of these posers don’t know really know anything about White movement groups. It’s quite strange to say the least.
Also he is a younger commenter. Early 20s. Possibly east asian.
Possibly east Asian???? Why???
Actually reading some of his blog entries, he’s white.
Being autist is a very odd phenomenon for the person involved because you simply can’t understand how people see you or why their mind works ‘irrationally’. Hence, bad people/good people dichotomy. There’s a good deal of child like innocence in the thought pattern. The person retains the nature of a child.
From my experience it never changes with life experience, travel or reading. I bet Bill Gates still fundamentally thinks all humans are fundamentally good but for ‘bad luck’ or environmental issues.
More or less opposite to schiz and psychopathy.
Psychopathy is an odd one because, there’s actually less self awareness than autism.
Psychopath = survival robot.
Autist = sudoku robot
Schiz = change nature of reality to preserve ego
Listen to Ted Bundy’s interview tapes. He’s a slippery eel. There is nothing under the bonnet. Hilary would be the same. The most you could unearth is a menacing rage at her opponents.
Both schiz and aut conditions lead to social isolation because they are maladaptations. Psychopathy does not. Even though its arguably the most dangerous neuro profile to others ironically.
With medication schiz can be diluted somewhat. I genuinely think autists are happier and less stressed out than schiz. They may complain about loneliness but the schiz smog is unbearable agony. You are 10 times more likely to ruin your career, divorce, become bankrupt, be homeless, become addicted to drugs, turn psychotic or have a mental breakdown as a schiz.
“Deep in the trenches carved into the floors of the Pacific and the Indian Oceans, there are fish which live and die without ever seeing or sensing the sun. These fabulous creatures cruise the depths like ghostly balloons, lit from within by their own radiance. Although they look delicate, they are actually marvels of biological design, built to withstand pressures that would squash a man as flat as a windowpane in the blink of an eye. Their great strength, however, is also their great weakness. Prisoners of their own alien bodies, they are locked forever in their dark depths. If they are captured and drawn toward the surface, toward the sun, they simply explode. It is not external pressure that destroys them, but its absence.”
I seem to have been created for Kinshasa or downtown Lahore. In fact, its arguable being in a more observably dangerous environment would be better than expending so much energy creating and not being able to react to one.
”Being autist is a very odd phenomenon for the person involved because you simply can’t understand how people see you or why their mind works ‘irrationally’.”
Where you take this pieces**
Look Philo,
the complete factual understanding of autism or any other mental disorder still is a partial to predominant unknown.
Most people can’t understand how [other] people see you.
Almost of human beings don’t knew why their minds are/were irrational… specially in the past, they were autistic** hum*
Maybe the greater difference between autistics and non-autistic of neurotypical nature is
the first group
is quite honest about their feelings and observations, the others not, as usual,
has been highly observed by neurotypical perspective’s or experts. When you only look for the details, defects and qualities of certain group, you tend to exagerate them/it.
When neurotypicals analyse themselves they tend to self-see as the sane ones. Really**
Still most of us don’t know why our minds can be irrational because most of us even believe WE can be irrational, sometimes or over-times, because ”we” always think that is the other who are or can be irrational, never ourselves.
”Theory of Mind” is a ‘thing’, by behavioral/expressive/vibrational nature, nor a concrete, but still a obvious existent thing… the problem is not the definition of theory of mind itself, but their aplicability in the real world contexts. In the real world autistics have LOWER theory of mind, on avg, but it doesn’t mean the non-autistics will be quite good, they are not. They tend to be better than autistics but not in the ideal way.
In the ideal way people would be excellent to understand the thoughts and needs of other, the complete empathy.
”Both schiz and aut conditions lead to social isolation because they are maladaptations. Psychopathy does not. Even though its arguably the most dangerous neuro profile to others ironically.”
Because it’s adaptable don’t mean it’s not be atypically maladaptative, we know there is a spectrum because adaptable and maladaptable in the way the pure adaptability seems unreachable while the current white suicide look like a case of pure maladaptability, the glory of human illusion against the often nasty but instrumentally remediable reality. Psychos, fundamentally the higher functioning ones, seems only a minority among them, are adaptative to themselves, not to the communities they are… the rest of psychos are so maladaptative than autistic, naivety and stupidity of other humans are for them what fish is to the fishman. They are dependent from the weaknesses of other typos.
Maladaptations also seems to be quite dependent from environment. Autism exist specially by now because the ”non-”autism” existence as well the shadow only exist, characteristically speaking, because the light of sun, if the shadow is a hypo-degree of light. Autism is semantically/psyquiatrically derivative from the criteria of the pre-stablished normalcy. If almost of human beings were autistics, maybe, the abnormal would be to be like [most of] neurotypicals.
Typical is dependent from quantitative prevalence.
So digging around on Jeff Epstein of Clinton fame.
“A court document alleges that Epstein ran a “sexual abuse ring”, and lent underage girls to “prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders”. (Wiki)
– ‘Well known PM’….That must be Tony Blair.
– Epstein put videos all over the house to video them in the act to blackmail these ‘leaders’ for favours.
– Ergo, whatever favours he received in business and so on are probably the paedophiles…Woody Allen, Alan Derschowitz, Ken Starr, Bill Clinton…Donald Trump?
– His black book has Mandelson (who I would have guessed was a peado), Prince Andrew, whom other sources suggest and others down multiple times.
– Others are just contacts. They key is no. of phone numbers per person. More numbers=more discretion=pimp services.
– The guy that handed in the black book got as much jail time as Epstein for running a child sex slave ring….ergo the judges were bought.
– No publicity in MSM.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897836/How-Prince-Andrew-s-sex-abuser-friend-Jeffrey-Epstein-kept-list-nicknamed-Holy-Grail-great-good-Bill-Clinton-Tony-Blair-Mick-Jagger-Donald-Trump.html
i agree. epstein’s “business” is blackmail.
his unmarried and a billionaire, and there’s nothing wrong with him physically afaik.
what’s his use to les wexner, if not to keep his secrets?
Blackmail is the Jews favourite tactic. More than bribery or harassment/intimidation.
It makes sense, bribery leads to bidding wars and harassment is illegal.
Blackmail is illegal but depends on self reporting your fetish or crime….
Ergo its the perfect corruption device.
according to peepee no one can have an IQ higher than 100.
peepee said my age WISC FSIQ was at most 129 on another thread. i’ve lost 4 points since then.
pretty soon it’ll be 40, and peepee and i will be tied. but then i’ll go down to 36, 32, … , 0, -4, -8, …
it’s not clear from peepee’s picture she made any score of 19.
still waiting for a score made at age >= 18. i guess i’ll have to wait until peepee turns 18.
video games don’t count as IQ tests peepee.
…my age 9 WISC FSIQ…
You’re still obsessing about what I think of your childhood WISC scores? Good Lord you’re a narcissist.
On the WISC-R. the mean average scaled score is 10 with an SD of roughly 2.2. So if we assume, based on your putative extremes that your average scaled score was 14.5, then you were about +2.05 SD above the U.S. mean (IQ 131, U.S. norms). But the norms are from 1972 and expire at a rate of 0.3 points per year. Further, the inclusion of non-whites makes U.S. norms a few points too high compared to white norms (though this cancels out at the extremes since whites have a narrower SD than Americans as a whole)
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/04/20/the-use-of-white-norms-when-calculating-iq-greenwich-scale/
that’s right peepee i am a…
gay alcoholic schizophrenic obsessive compulsive with autism.
psychology is a mental illness.
AND
i suffer from narcissistic personality disorder.
AND
i’m a sadistic bully!
And let’s add hypocrite to the list since you’ve used most of those labels against me and others.
Moogabe/Nuttela/Epstajn/Ca-macho syndrome*
Videla/Epstein/Mugabe/Camacho
IS
D.B Cooper!