For comments unrelated to my latest article: Is the black-white IQ gap shrinking? (updated and revised), please post here.
Please post about any topic at all.
I watched the recent PBS documentary on The Mamas and the Papas and they must be right up there with The Beatles as one of the greatest bands of all time. What an incredible collection of music for a group that was only together for a couple of years.
It’s amazing how young they looked in the 1960s. I had a professor who argued people didn’t get old with age, it just appears that way because older cohorts were always wrinkled and grey.
The genius of the group was probably John Phillips (more evidence that height and IQ are correlated) for writing those catchy tunes, but watching the documentary, it was Mamma Cass that stole my heart.
As a fat Jewish girl during a more anti-Semitic era, she must have wanted so desperately to fit in with these cool white kids, and I’m so glad they accepted her, as did America. Cass’s incredible voice added real value to the culture, as did her creative body language. I love when she introduces the song Creeque Alley and says “cue the tape.” Watch how she opens her moth wide and starts bouncing up and down in excitement for the song about to be played (Very Oprah!).
One of the things we learned in the documentary is originally, Cass did not even want to appear on stage with the slim blond blue eyed Michelle Phillips and would only sing from the back of the room. What an ego boost that must have been to Michelle, “you’re so beautiful, I feel ugly being seen with you.” Did Cass really have such low self-esteem, or was she a master manipulator who knew exactly how to make others like her?
After The Mammas and the Pappas broke up, Mamma Cass started a solo career, and probably wondered, who’s going to turn out to see a fat Jewish girl sing solo? The show sold out, two nights in a row! She was so excited she phoned Michelle Phillips to share the happy news. That night she died of a heart attack in her sleep at the age of only 32.
“I do know one thing” said Michelle Phillips. “Cass Elliot died a very happy woman”.
At that point I was so overwhelmed with emotion I had to turn the documentary off.
Pumpkin Person 
That’s a long story. Basically I just corrected the scores they obtained in their home countries for the effects of malnutrition and in the case of adults (lack of schooling)
However I was overestimating the effect of nutrition (somewhat) and completely ignoring the effects of socio-economic environment
Overall, third world populations were a bit more environmentally disadvantaged than i thought, which means they have more genetic potential than i thought
I may even need to revise the numbers upward yet again …not sure
Can you tell that long story ? Or at least give a link ? What do you think of gulf arab countries low average IQs despite pretty good environments ?
Inbreeding.
Can you tell that long story ? Or at least give a link ? What do you think of gulf arab countries low average IQs despite pretty good environments ?
I’ll post more about it in the future but, the lesson of the Flynn effect is that environment has a much bigger effect on IQ scores than previously thought. When we read that Arabs average IQs in the 80s (on modern white norms) and Africans average in the 60s, that sounds incredibly low, until you realize that the British were averaging about 70 on the exact same test circa 1900.
So I asked myself, why did the British score at least 30 points lower than they do today in 1900? Well, the average British man was probably 3 inches shorter in 1900 than today, so you have to correct for the effect of nutrition on real intelligence. The average Victorian also had 5 to 7 years less school than Brits today, so you have to adjust for the effect of schooling on IQ scores (it’s unlikely school makes people much smarter, but it does increase knowledge and motivation). Lastly, the average Victorian was raised by parents with even less schooling, and adoption studies show being raised by more educated people also increases test scores (this effect appears to vanish in adulthood, but that’s illusory-see the Dickens-Flynn model).
Now the same environmental factors which explain why whites today score so much higher than Victorians, also explains why African Americans score so much higher than Africans.
As for Arabs, it may seem that some of them have a good environment because some of their countries are rich, but the average height all over the Arab World is relatively low, suggesting malnutrition (though genetics, including inbreeding, may have impaired their height), and the average education level of people and their parents (especially women) is also low, so it’s unlikely they have reached their genetic potential.
One needs data on Arabs raised from birth in First World conditions, but the samples need to be representative (not elite immigrants). I should arrange for a bunch of Syrian refugees to be tested. If they score 84, then I’ll know they’re a representative sample. Then in 20 years, we can test their kids, born in America, and see if they score higher than their parents on measures of IQ and height. This will show the effects of First World world environment on Arab mental and physical phenotype.
“this effect appears to vanish in adulthood, but that’s illusory-see the Dickens-Flynn mode”
Go on. I haven’t read all those papers in a while. Need a refresh.
“One needs data on Arabs raised from birth in First World conditions, but the samples need to be representative (not elite immigrants). I should arrange for a bunch of Syrian refugees to be tested. If they score 84, then I’ll know they’re a representative sample”
This may be of use to you.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/6/e20153994?sso=1&sso_redirect_count=1&nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR%3a+No+local+token
I can’t link the pdf as I’m on my phone, I’ll link it later. I’d like to see you go in depth on this data, like through the rest scores and stuff, and show what the average IQ of the Syrian refugee children is with this data.
like through the rest scores and stuff, and show what the average IQ of the Syrian refugee children is with this data.
The data includes Syrians?
Damn it I can’t find the paper anymore, I thought I did. I’ll have to look harder. This is some great data. It does say that “Studies are not generalizable to other cohorts.” and “Major risk factors for learning problems included parental misunderstandings about educational styles and expectations, teacher stereotyping and low expectations, bullying and racial discrimination, premigration and postmigration trauma, and forced detention.”
On the second point on stereotyping, WN may say hUrrr dese stoopid brown skins alwayz gettin da handowtz, but if this wording is included in the abstract, this should be looked at in full. People champion science, for instance for racial differences, but when something comes out that has a sound study they throw it away because it clashes with their beliefs.
Seems to be Syrians too!
“With the arrival of 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada — many of them children — Dr. Minhas said it’s important for communities, health care providers and educators to be aware that a child’s experiences in the first few years of life affects development potential, relationships, and their ability to navigate and succeed in society.”
…
“Health care providers and community organizations should bolster youth programs and support services for earlier identification and intervention for developmental, learning or behavioural difficulties, with an emphasis on child mental health. For instance, St. Michael’s hosts a rotating, monthly clinic along with four other sites focused specifically on the unique health needs of Syrian refugees.”
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160519151910.htm
I’d love to see an in depth analysis on this from you and to see, if possible, what the IQ of these children are. It’d be a great post I think (I much enjoy your posts on IQ – not the estimates – and evolution) to see what the effects of first-world countries have on intelligence and educational outcomes.
If Britain had an average IQ of 70 and was 30 points below the average, which countries had an IQ of 100?
Please post about any topic at all.
In that case, I will take this time to discuss the ethnic genetic interests surrounding prisons and prisoners. I find it odd that prisons aren’t racially segregated by government in countries ruled by elite whites. Of course, prisoners already segregate themselves along racial lines of their own accord in multi ethnic prisons. But you’d expect white politicians to find a way to give white prisoners their own prisons. Arguably, they’ve already done that by creating minimum security prisons for white collar prisons but I find it interesting that lower class whites are left to fend for themselves in the general population of maximum security prisons, where the most dangerous criminals of all rule through force. Since whites are outnumbered to begin with and innately less violent than blacks according to crime statistics, whites are very easy to victimize.
Perhaps this goes to show that people really are divided by class more than race. Of course, you could also argue that people are divided by intelligence more than anything else and that the disproportionate number of black prisoners reflects this obvious truth (since low IQs are very common among violent criminals).
Well seeing as you’ve opened that line of avenue, why shouldn’t we segregate schools and workplaces?
I’m not actually contesting you here. Believe it or not I’m open to that point of view as well for some of the reasons you outline.
At a meta level, obviously I believe that with borders and nations as well.
Its a hard thing to reducing macro phenomenon and theory to micro and vice versa in economics, physics, ethics and psychology.
To clarify, I’m not a proponent of racial segregation (though I’m not against it either, as long as it’s voluntary). I just find the lack of a segregationist mandate in our prison systems quizzical given what I know about ethnic genetic interests. Stated differently, I cynically expect people to act in accordance with their EGIs and am surprised when they don’t. With that said, you’re right to assume that surprised is not exactly synonymous with delighted. It would probably be better for minorities—in this case, whites—if prisons and other select institutions were segregated.
Well seeing as you’ve opened that line of avenue, why shouldn’t we segregate schools and workplaces?
As far as I know, the majority of western work places aren’t that dangerous or discriminatory in the year 2016. Too many Human Resources departments and frivolous lawsuits over microaggressions. Select schools, namely inner city high schools, do seem very much like a microcosm of prison to me, so it is somewhat odd that politicians don’t find loopholes to segregate them.
At a meta level, obviously I believe that with borders and nations as well.
I was naively opposed to the very idea of nations and borders for a very long time. I had this fantasy that people from all around the world could live harmoniously as one. In other words, I thought like the Swedes. After a while, you realize what giant shitholes a lot of non-western countries are and that the people from these countries bring their problems with them.
I do think a lot these days about the genetic future of humanity. It increasingly seems like there’s a genetic war going on and very few people are even aware it exists.
We tend to overvalue individuals rights rather than the future of society. The western world will be a victim of multiculturalism. We’re letting massive droves of low IQ people into the first world and we’re getting rape-game playing refugees as a result. The rapefugees ironically enough will probably win the genetic war because they aren’t inhibited by things like a conscience; they spread their genes forcefully–without even considering whether it is moral, let alone the long term societal consequences–while we sit on our thumbs, terrified of offending delicate minds by actually wresting control of the ship called humanity.
For the record, if I haven’t made myself clear, like Pumpkin Person, I don’t actually care about skin color at all; I’ll take a high IQ with black skin—in other words, a genetic outlier like Oprah—over a pale skinned simpleton any day of the week. I simply refuse to ignore the clear correlation between skin color and IQ.
”I’ll take a high IQ with black skin—in other words, a genetic outlier like Oprah”
Oprah Winfrey is a completely frivolous person. I had thought only Pumpkin who really believed on the pseudo-greatness of this woman but seems not, interesting and depressing thought.
Hbd folks are not serious people.
I value a ”pale skinned simpleton” hundred times more than a useless black ”high iq” tv entertainer.
hbd folks pretend to be a kind people who value omnipotent IQ of whatever individuals but they are just trying to convince most people that they deserve more than others to be part of the elites, or better, to be the new ”meritocratic” elites. Just a common dirty game of so-called ”smarter”.
”I thought like the Swede”
Just like a stupid blonde?
Oh yeah, speaking of ethnic genetic interests, you should read Mutation Planet by Barrington Bayley and write an article about it. It’s a short science fiction story that’s a parable of sorts.
I left a better description of it on Pumpkin Person Buys the British Pound.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/06/27/pumpkin-person-buys-the-british-pound/#comment-28415
I like these open threads. Talking about other things with like minds is cool. I like that threads can be on damn topic now instead of diverging all the time.
PP you should do a post on David Piffer’s paper on racial differences in IQ and allele frequencies.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/06/02/individual-and-racial-differences-in-iq-and-allele-frequencies/
https://topseudoscience.wordpress.com/2016/01/10/the-forbidden-paper-on-the-population-genetics-of-iq/
Click to access 1441332656918.pdf
Wouldn’t make for an interesting post from you.
Would make for an interesting post from you*
I’d look like to see you look at George Price and his look into altruism and his Price Equation.
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/george-price-altruism
That’d be very interesting to see from you.
Actually the Mamas and Papas have a dark secret. That is John Phillips sexually abused his wonderful daughter Mackenzie for over 10 years.
Mackenzie was in American Graffitti, probably my favourite movie of all time. She was a very cute and endearing girl.
She lost her virginity to Mick Jagger I think and she was destroyed by drug addiction.
That was a horrible tragedy. She could have been an A list actress with her charisma.
Watching American Graffitti in a dark room and listening to songs like The Flamingoes is an amazing experience.
I have a question for PP or anyone who think they know;
Is there a correlation between Spatial IQ and ‘remembering faces’?
For instance if someone is very good at remembering faces of people they recently met (as opposed to names), does that correlate to (Spatial) IQ?
is there any data on this?
This is a response to HAL the virtue warrior against THE EVIL Racists who will cleanse the world of amygdala function, neuron by neuron, thought crime by thought crime:
1. Jews invented the concept of “racism” ” in the early 50s/late 40s in their academic and Frankfurt circles. This word didn’t exist prior to that. It was not an accepted way of describing many tribal behaviours. Nobody before this period knew what this word connotates today and certainly weren’t mercilessly primed by it over 10-15 years of early childhood to associate evil and wrongness with tribalism
2. THIS IS THE KEY POINT: Most people are “racist” without this socialisation and indoctrination. We see that in three ways: white people who grew up in non Jew media/academia dominated cultures like South Africa and Australia. White people from older generations who keep seeing the goalposts and threshold for racism move. Other races peoples who were moulded in different Extractor cultures and whose casual attitudes to “racism” around the world are “wrong”.
3. The least susceptible to “racism” indoctrination in human hierarchies are the following – alpha males with high Test, those with low affective empathy/psychopaths, (paranoid) schizos. These misfits and criminals or whatever you want to term them, are basically not only immune to “morality” sermons about “racism”, but indeed any Extractor “morality” conditioning (emperor’s divine right, Pharoah syndrome, ‘free market’, etc etc). This is why women love them so much sexually. Because while they are dangerous, and even maladaptive, they can never be duped to be slaves. The algorithm favours those that express energy, not give it.
4. When you see it for what is, and the examples it uses and those it punishes, its clear the word and its associated religious policemen are using it basically a way to stop only whites abusing their political power (in their own lands). Every other race has been given a “racist” amnesty, including of course Jews whose actions in Israel are clearly “racist” beyond any doubt according to the strictures of that make believe subjective creed (blood citizenship, walls, bulldozing Arab houses and forced relocations, neverending lebensraum wars against Arabs using white males and resources, banning of Ethiopian Jews from right of return).
5. You can see the cognitive dissonance merely by the way many low IQ moralists think “education” solves racism. Not REASON per se.
BECAUSE REASON CAN ONLY LEAD TO THE INEXORABLE CONCLUSION THAT RACISM IS ACTUALLY A META-RATIONAL WAY OF MAINTAINING ONE’S TRIBAL GENETIC INTEREST. THATS WHY ITS EMBEDDED IN THE CODE. THE ALGORITHM WOULDN’T HAVE LEFT IT IN THERE TO SUCH A FUNDAMENTAL AND WIDE EXTENT AMONG ALL RACES OF MAN IF IT WASN’T PURPOSEFUL.
6. Pumpkin keeps banging on about how low IQ people can only be “racist”, but can’t comprehend why if “racism” is such a low IQ and “irrational” trait, why its selected for in every race worldwide and doubly so for East Asians and Jews who are thought to be high IQ.
“Racism” is essentially (bad) white tribalism. And it was invented to stop white tribalism by Zionist tribalists who live among whites because all the other races were too low empathy and schizo to live amongst.
Strictly speaking the verbal manipulation of autist high empathy whites is neither “good” or “evil” as well I might add.
Voila, philosophical symmetry in principle (another autist trait). Yummy symmetry never made a women squirt. YoWsa.
Great post.
Oxytocin also makes people ‘racist’. It increases when mothers have children, making a pair bond. It increases during stressful situations in your life. And, I would assume, that more ethnocentric people have higher levels of brain oxytocin. I’d love to see a study like that.
‘Racism’ evolved because it was definitely beneficial to all humans as a whole. It’s just Rushton’s GST in action, really.
And the term ‘racist’ and ‘racism’ was coined by Trotsky.
When the U.S. was 90% ‘tribalist’, in say the 1950s, the tribalists obviously averaged a higher IQ because it was less of a rarity (-0.3 x z score), where Z score is lower.
The people with higher IQs were still more likely to overcome it.
As for East Asians and Jews, that doesn’t disprove anything.
Perhaps it is the lower IQ of those races (and keep in mind NE Asians are barely smarter than Whites), that causes such a tribal attitude (which is exaggerated with regards to Asians by the WNs).
This is one of the most solid segments of HBD, especially with brain function.
I like your posts but can either of you honestly say with a straight face “fire breathing alt-reich nutcases are just as smart as Whites who are not fire breathing alt-reich nutcases, on average”?
Nope.
the alt-right is better informed of the issues than than your typical liberal who gets their talking points from Colbert of whoever is popular these days
memorizing facts is irrelevant.
The research simply pro-ports what it does.
These segments of HBD can not be denied because it is not politically opportunistic!
I like your posts but can either of you honestly say with a straight face “fire breathing alt-reich nutcases are just as smart as Whites who are not fire breathing alt-reich nutcases, on average”?”
I highly doubt it. Most people push bullshit like the Solutrean Hypothesis and other ‘YT wuz first!! We wuz kangzzzz!!” garbage around. Shit about Nordic this and that. In my experience, a lot of them don’t know what they’re talking about.
Call themselves ‘race-realists’, yet hardly know anything about genes beyond ‘blacks dumb, whites juuuuust right, asians smart but no creative’.
It’s more complicated than that.
Sidetracking, almost all of America’s mayors who were very subpar with their civic governance, happened to be Jewish.
Jews, as a whole are not very talented, and they lack governance skills. They only do well in the background counting money.
Israel is a much more dysfunctional nation, if you compare it to Greece.
during thee rein of Arafat, suicide bombings were very common. if anything, Israel showed restraint / look at the cluster of bombs in the early 2000’s which ended after he died https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_suicide_attacks
It may be inherent, but it stlil varies across populations. And these variances show that groups with more homogenity are more inclined to follow their EGI however, depending on the IQ of the society in question they will express it in different manners, where jews and east asians will propogate their community, southern white proles will simply spend their energy on irrational hatred. It’s the same with blacks in gangs.
Also true.
very true.
It’s not even a debate anymore, it’s a fact.
I could easily deny that Whites have higher IQs than Blacks by saying ‘Whites just like whose popular’ or some incoherent nonsense.
Seriously. People wonder why I lash out at HBDers.
If HBD wants to be taken seriously it needs to stop with;
‘Blacks and Hispanics are dumb and have no redeeming qualities. Whites are not as smart as Asians but are still better cuz creativity, cuck’, and then
‘although all evidence on IQ tests and brain imaging say racialists are less intelligent, they’re not because I’m a racialist and I’m sooper smrt’.
It’s no wonder it’s censored from the mainstream; it’s generally a laughing stock. PP acknowledges these things so he’s not but most HBD bloggers don’t.
“It’s no wonder it’s censored from the mainstream; it’s generally a laughing stock. PP acknowledges these things so he’s not but most HBD bloggers don’t.”
The alt-right has ruined HBD for the rest of us. Despite how much it fascinates me, I never mention my interest in HBD outside of this blog, as I don’t want to be associated with the atavistic “us vs. them” mentality that pervades the HBD community (not to mention the overt racism, antisemitism, misogyny, etc.).
I hate to come across, as “The Philosopher” put it, a “35 BMI virgin gamma”, but everything you are saying is very true and it is infuriating.
Grey is correct that some studies have shown Cons (mainstream mind you, not Reichers) to have better ‘general knowledge’ than Lefties, but the question is, who chose what is ‘general knowledge’?
Is it;
Obama is;
a. 6’1”
b. A lizard King from Mars
c. from Hawaii
d. conservative by European standards.
The study would likely proport b to be the answer then chastise “liberals” for not knowing it.
Lol.
What we evolved in a hunter gatherer society isnt necessarily useful in a civilized world
cool story, bro
If we’re in the business of denying facts and throwing out research because it doesn’t fit our personal political views, I wonder what the more liberal of us should decide to throw out…?
God I hate most HBDers.
“Stupid people don’t know they’re stupid”
literally no better than the mainstream leftists who deny HBD, whom they hate. That’s exactly what they do.
“literally no better than the mainstream leftists who deny HBD, whom they hate. That’s exactly what they do.”
Yes, I completely agree with you.
Of course, we are all guilty of indulging in confirmation bias; none of us are entirely objective in our thinking. Generally speaking, liberals are more intelligent than conservatives: but both groups tend to operate from an instinctual, emotional mindset, without taking alternate perspectives into consideration. Sometimes this is for the best—when used sparingly and strategically, “black-and-white” thinking can be a good thing—but, more often than not, it leads to lazy way of thinking that easily falls prey to cognitive distortions. Unfortunately, as soon as this cognitive laziness is perpetuated within a group setting, it becomes near-impossible to eliminate from a community.
“If we’re in the business of denying facts and throwing out research because it doesn’t fit our personal political views, I wonder what the more liberal of us should decide to throw out…?”
Perfect example is this article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1177123/The-European-Created-fragments-fossil-face-forbears-35-000-years-ago.html
When this came out people were saying “No!!!! Th-that’s not true!!!!” It is true. Whites didn’t always exist. It’s funny to me, because these people saying this isn’t true are denying evolution to a point.
If I put Chuine and Hals comments into the feminine brain algo detector, what would it decide?
Hmmm….hahaha.
The truth is offensive. But only because you’ve been primed to react like that to words that will unchain you. Verbal mewling cannot heal the wound of illumination. Rationalise post hoc, but conditioned before by decades of Magic Negro, Atticus Finch and the Blank Slate to emotionally commit the defence of your beloved illusion.
Someone google ‘american inventors’.
Is the illusion failing?
Someone google ‘american mathematicians’.
Is the illusion failing?
The Jews blackmailed whites like Woodrow Wilson and Balfour to seize Palestinian land, remove arabs and hand it to them. This is mentioned for instance in Henry Goldman’s own biography (he of Goldman Sachs). For you to say the Jews ‘went easy’ on arabs shows a completely derelict understanding of the history and the creation of the Israeli state.
Consider that the media could lie about something as obvious but profoundly malignant as the Iraq WMD or 9-11…or JFK….or the NSA supercomputer….
how easy would it be to refurbish ancient history then?
The sad truth is that I’m not sure either what’s really happened in many historical instances. When I compare my knowledge of world events to 1 year ago to now even, it is major difference, and of course a quantum leap to 3 years ago and another dimension to 5. I’m sure it may be the same for most of you.
Some will instinctively know their indoctrination is ‘off’. They have no empirics often. Average intelligence maybe. Lack of travelling. And so on, so they can come across as irrational. Even crazy. But the impulse is there. They lean schizo. They may not have the intellect to understand, but the feeling is true. They will feel as I always did that the people at the top are ‘out to get me’. They are uber sensitive to dark human behaviour, because they assume it as ‘baked in’ to human nature. Correctly so but too much maybe.
We now know people like Dulles, Kim Jong Un, Stalin, Putin and Beria are much more likely at the top of all human social hierarchies, not Gandhi and Mother Teresa. We laugh at the barbarity of other countries Extractors, and don’t even suspect that our own are just as psychopathic or paranoid schizo.
Do the Jews run the world? It can be solved theoretically to an extent. If their verbals are 15 points higher on average than even whites, who are second, and its probable (a) tail genius verbal Jews exist and (b) will have tribal instincts…YES DING DING.
One of the problems of enlightenment as Socrates sadly pointed out, is that you only understand how much you don’t know…or maybe now, can’t know due to historical revisionism and incessant brainwashing. We are no better informed about world events than those that live in Eygpt or Thailand I’m sorry to inform you. The illusion is certainly more complex, as befitting the higher IQs of whites. But an illusion all the same.
Theoretical physicist Ron Unz series of essays ‘American Pravda’ are a fascinating primer on the subject. It is likely, for various reasons that most of our knowledge is a distortion, half truth, outright lie or hypnotic emotional illusion.
Before the internet, certainly the case. Now less so. There is definitely a revolution happening now. All revolutions begin as intellectual ones.
Maybe a good epistemological rule is to assume the opposite to the Extractors messages as Unz argues the Chinese had to under Mao.
When it is revealed wonderful Magic Negroes are the most violent, sadistic and barbaric and that millions of the victims and crimes have been hidden away or the true extent of the ghetto Kinshasa, it won’t be long before you work out the greatest myth they have curated for half a century – Hitler is an illusion as well.
….did you know who owned 55% of the wealth in Weimar Germany despite being 1% of the population? (as recorded by Harvard professor Niall Ferguson in the Cash Nexus). What do you think people saw when they googled ‘German philosopher’ back then?
Aha.
That is why they are building the supercomputer…before its too late.
Google American couples.
Intelligence should be problem solving towards fitness/repro, not sudoku solving. On that basis, many “racists” are more “intelligent”. At least socially anyway.
Gottfried, their music is not their own! Can’t they even hear that their violins are untuned?
As I’ve said countless times before, Obama supported Monetarism by renominating Ben Bernanke.
Monetarism was really first used on a large scale by Margaret Thatcher, and because of the government lending to large companies at low interest rates we see that the issue becomes a lack of incentive to take risks*, which hence ironically causes low inflation/high unemployment, AKA no growth.
* the same criticism of socialism, already happening (OMG).
So really American conservatives are quite extreme relative to the developed world.
you’re right but in the wrong language.
there’s a more perspicuous iso-morphism to your jive.
namely:
1. central banks should never be and should never have been independent of politics…they only are independent, because so few understand money and banking.
2. in fact, their claim to independence is itself political…and political in the extreme.
3. the solution of the libertarians is to ban the money ex nihilo power of the central bank, aka the gold standard…but that’s like “curing” brain cancer by shooting the patient in the head…the euro-zone is proof that the gold standard means depression forever…(that is, for the euro-zone countries in depression, the euro is effectively gold.)…
needless to say…the world of man can only stay irrational for so long…(the natural world can stay irrational forever)…
the central banks will become arms of the central governments…they will be thoroughly politicized…
as they should have been all along…
and it’ll happen in the next 10 years.
and as i’ve pointed out to your thick spic head before…
…and because of the government lending to large companies at low interest rates we see that the issue becomes a lack of incentive to take risks*, which hence ironically causes low inflation/high unemployment, AKA no growth.
is crazy jive talk.
1. “the government” is NOT the central bank.
2. the ecb and boj have bought lots of corporate bonds. has the fed? and have they bought new issues?
3. corporate america, at least, has been DE-leveraging since the crisis.
try again cubano.
semantics.
a precis for peepee and any other fucktards…
1. your account at the bank is a liability in the bank’s balance sheet…nothing more.
2. a bank is a highly leveraged private debt closed end fund. like this:
3. the central bank is the banks’ bank. you have a bank account. your bank also has a bank account. unlike other banks, the central bank can create money out of thin air, ex nihilo.
4. theoretically the central bank’s liabilities are money. its assets are treasury bonds. but really the central bank, like MCO, can have negative equity, and there’s no problem.
5. the money creating power of central banks is very useful in un-doing recessions/depressions.
6. the “gold standard” is code for un-doing the central bank’s power to create money from nothing.
7. so today yellen answered lots of questions. she claimed the fed was independent. politics was never a topic. when the records are released in 5 years there will be no mention of politics…except she admitted a few months prior that the possibility of brexit was a consideration…
it’s a giant PUT-ON.
it’s a JOKE.
until now the c-banks have been boring…who cares…
now they’re at the center of a FAILING system…
it’s only a matter of time. they WILL be politicized.
…like this: http://www.morningstar.com/cefs/xnys/nsl/quote.html…
Ive been changing my opinion recently on independent central banks. The lex column in the financial times makes a very cogent case that money creation and rationing should be nationalised, like china.
The main argument was always weimar germany. But having reviewed the era, it was enormous war debt burdens that caused monestisation and not carefree african central bankers in the bundesbank.
Funnily enough i dont think the chinese system is any more unjust, unstable or inefficient than our privatised credit dispensory system even though it is openly crony capitalism.
Im not sure what the optimal monetary system would be. Modern monetary theory seems to have some ideas i like . I imagine it would have to be in sync with the psychological and genetic disposition of the nation.
Perhaps a fluid engineer or mechanical engineer can opine. The monetary system is as close as youll get to fluid engineering problems in economics.
PP,
I feel that I lack intrinsic self-motivation at times. Now that I take anxiety medication I now seem to be more motivated but only when I find a goal at my level. A goal is something you can hold onto. It creates a feeling that of contentment when you reach it. I feel content when I understand how to do something because then I can take things as they come along. It is very calm. There is a problem that I have been working on from when I was 12, “machine intelligence”. I think I finally understand how to solve the problem. I do not know everything that needs to be done but I am very close.
https://illuminaticatblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/20/the-thought-of-holding-a-thought/
A new problem is understanding the diversity of personality that machine “intelligence” must learn. When virtual reality becomes commercialised the tools to create A.I. will reach the network effect. I will be able to see a virtual brain operate in real time. The problem is that Virtual Intelligence has no content to learn from in its current environment. Virtual Worlds will be a playground for it. We are in a transition similar to the transition of 2D games to 3D games. Virtual Reality.
Wasn’t Huxley a Satanist?
I think in his time it had a different meaning than what came after; “Anton LaVey”
The occult is a strange place to visit. Not for weak minds.
Well Laveyan Satanism is just a twist on Ayn Rand’s Objectivism. I’m not well read on older Satanism, but I’m sure he was a Satanist/into the occult.
not a twist.
libertarianism = satanism = milton friedman-ism.
for fuck’s sake…
i made the highest score in the world on the old SoA exam 100…
5 tied me. so i guess it was a perfect score…that’s what i thought after i’d sat it.
friedman gave up trying to be an actuary…
BECAUSE it was too hard…
too OBJECTIVE…
so…
INSTEAD…
he won a nobel in economics.
…
same as it is ever was…
THE TRUTH…IS…
THE TRUTH…
AND IT IS…
HORRIBLE.
The top 6 out of how many people? And how filtered for IQ were the people who took the test?
You’re such an absolutist. Absolutists are said to make good talk show hosts assuming they’re not stupid, as most absolutists are.
i tied myself peepee.
so 4 others scored as high.
how many scored lower?
1600.
from a very select population.
So normalizing the curve, you scored about +2.6 SD
But then we don’t know the IQ distribution of the test takers and the distribution may have been skewed
Is Oprah an absolutist?
Is Oprah an absolutist?
Kind of. So is Dr. Phil. Absolutists are very persuasive because they’re so sure of themselves.
Here you go PP
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/09/20/are-australoids-and-pacific-islanders-negroid-a-reply-to-pumpkinperson/
Race relaist you may find this study interesting its tracking trends in our evolution. It found women are developing longer maturation rates and we’re evolving to spend less time in school despite the fact the our educational attendence has been increasing. I just thought it was intriguing because it shows our culture and evolutionary path are butting heads.
http://m.pnas.org/content/113/28/7693.full
http://www.evoanth.net/2016/09/20/americans-evolving-less-educated/
let’s do it!
He also scored four times in the 2010 World Cup and twice at the 2014 World Cup, which put him ahead of Ronaldo in the all-time list with 16 goals.[6] Klose is also the top scorer of all time for Germany, who have never lost a game in which Klose scored.
the layers of men…
from a turk-saudi arms dealer…
couldn’t have said it better myself…
but…
needless to say…i hope…
adnan’s accurate description of contemporary global reality…
is LESS accurate…
WITHIN…
a genuine nation-state.
…it was a story with two sides…
said the father…the billionaire father…
himself an heir…
and indeed it was…the story of apartheid ZA has yet to be told…HONESTLY.
the father is a genuinely talented artist, but he’s a drunk with not that high an IQ…
OBVIOUSLY!
the heirs are more easily corrupted…
precisely because most of them (but not all of them) are MUCH less intelligent than their parents…or grandparents…or…
great…great grandparents.
…
reality contradicts peepee-ism.
and even more absurd…
peepee-ism contradicts peepee-ism.
…
The Bluest Eye
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bluest_Eye
vs
The Groundlings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Groundlings
…
that is…
my dying dog…is so fucking good looking…
they call from 100m…
“you’re dog is BEAUTIFUL!”
very odd.
very strange.
why would complete strangers,
old and young, male and female,
feel the need to YELL about the beauty of my dog?
seriously…
it’s fucked up…
but…
IT’S REALITY!
…
it’s not me!
it’s…
X or Y…
decide which!
X:
or
Y:
THE SOMME STILL RAGES ON…
100 years ago…
TODAY!
“Nationalism”
https://www.google.com/#q=Rhodesia+GDP
and, Mugabe has praised the real Mugabe but supported apartheid…….
People from the Real Mugabe’s “nationalist” society, are pouring into the integrated society!
Would Singapore be Singapore without the Chinese;
NO!
Nationalism didn’t work then.
“crazy mofo”
“st eel w8ing”
“st eel w8ing “
crazy schizo can’t even begin to defend his perverted political ideology.
Sad!
perverted?
it’s the ORIGINAL politics.
the nation-state was the first kind of state.
modern ethnically heterogeneous states are like faggotry or pedophilia.
you’re a boring and stupid spic.
“the ORIGINAL politics.”
I.E. more primitive.
“modern ethnically heterogeneous states are like faggotry or pedophilia.”
Elaborate, please.
“you’re a boring and stupid spic.”
So refreshing, so inspiring!!!!
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQVUcMcjlGwaw8d1z7BaLNm9msQ1KFbw68EDZRsEUsXgmkFSw7Z
A genius!!!!
Fraternal my friends!
I honestly thought the second the PresidentA was impeached, the Police resumed killing gays for sport, in Brazil.
Since you changed your name that very day I thought you’d been victimized, Santodolto.
”the Police resumed killing gays for sport, in Brazil”
No my friend it’s a hoax.
”Since you changed your name that very day I thought you’d been victimized, Santodolto.”
I know Willy my friend!!!
“my friend” = my “longtime companion”
fiddy cent with a ‘tache?
why are all latino men at least bi?
they’ve been fucked in the ass by the un-mixed europeans who rule them…
for 500 fucking years!
and they still don’t care.
so now we’re mestizos?
“crazy mofo”.
The “my friend” is also an East Indian thing, apparently…
at least Mugabe has stop insisting both Santo and I are “peepee the Blasian”
I’m not bi, or homosexual, but the stereotype is largely true.
Little Narco was a ‘guest of honor’ at Miami foam parties.
lol
Mugabe is a genius.
”I’m not bi, or homosexual, but the stereotype is largely true.”
Exactly, like the hispanic stereotype!!!
”why are all latino men at least bi?”
remarkable insight!!!
may be the iberian blood…
=)
Js have something to explain to you about hispanic superiority ( prevalence of bissexuality).
“Js have something to explain to you about hispanic superiority”
Okay, I have to admit Santodolto is not as big of a dolt as I thought;
that’s really funny, actually.
Throw away all this negativity my friend!!
Don’t ”think”
feel…
even the spanish don’t want to live together.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalisms_and_regionalisms_of_Spain#Andalusia
yet latinos are all supposed to hold hands and sing Kum ba yah…
and latinos want to make the US into another new world shithole.
Mugabe has finally come out as Nordicist….
finally….
Latin-American countries, regardless of Whiteness, are generally shitholes, yes.
Latin American culture of any subset is obviously inferior;
but iirc Spain has a better gini than the U.S of A.
AND,
as JS has explained many times, thanks to Iberian Culture, one of the factors making Latin America a shithole s NOT racial tensions………
……
why did you give up the “Marsha Murphy” shtick?
no you stupid spic.
the fact that nationalism/regionalism is so strong in spain is a VIRTUE not a vice.
how can this point fly over your head at such a height?
nordicist = fucktard.
spain seems to have more than its fair share of separatist movements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_separatist_movements_in_Europe#/media/File:Active_separatist_movements_in_Europe.svg
the nords figured it out:
norway, sweden, iceland, and denmark are no less alike than galicians and catalonians or basque or andalusians…
but they are 4 separate countries.
No you want regionalism?!?!?
I debunked your beloved “nationalism” as a good ideology, all you did is name call, and now you want “regionalism”?
“Crazy mofo”
Obviously it’s historical more than anything;
The North Spanish weren’t under Muslim rule for as long, while the South had to wait until the 1400s.
It’s the Southerners that really had nothing to lose in the Muslims being ousted (no skills, no nothing), and hence were often times the predominant migrants to the Canary Islands and Latin America.
This is why South Spain may be crummier, than say, Basque country.
But don’t tell the Nordicists.
regardless, you know who is more of “regionalists” in Spicistan?
The lower IQ ones.
You know who’s not?
The higher IQ ones.
Guaranteed.
what kind of argument is that?
1. stupid people believe A
2. smart people believe not A
therefore
3. not A is true?
now you’re sounding like peepee.
anyway…
tonight i’m having gay sex with a guy by the name of “jose cuervo”.
i’m straight, but i’m gay for jose.
a mexican goes to a doctor…
“doctor i have two penises!”
“i call him jose.”
“what do ya call the other one, HOSE B?”
”AND,
as JS has explained many times, thanks to Iberian Culture, one of the factors making Latin America a shithole s NOT racial tensions………”
So if Anglo-saxon America had treated blacks better since their early history, had remained racially separated AND without leftist noise, they have won.
The idea that Latin America never have racial tensions is wrong, sorry dear japanese amigo.
Js, this brave conquistador, has tried to paint Latin America as a wonderful achievement of the santíssima Spain.
And he’s not wrong at all.
But the historical enormous social and ethnic inequality don’t make Latin America better than Anglo America but just like a new world India (unfair) caste system. Indeed, most black people in (Anglo)merica have great time to grow economically than in any other nation in the earth even in places like France or Spain. They on avg just don’t take this opportunity, i don’t know why…
Anglo)merica is the land of opportunity despite progressive problems…
South Africa also have during important period of his history little racial tension as well most of anglo colonies in Africa. So remarkable and inspiring achievements!!!
”anyway…
tonight i’m having gay sex with a guy by the name of “jose cuervo”.
i’m straight, but i’m gay for jose.
a mexican goes to a doctor…
“doctor i have two penises!”
“i call him jose.”
“what do ya call the other one, HOSE B?””
Santo- Brazil has had it’s issues, yes.
I (or JS) should have specified Spain, and of course even then it’s not always true.
And, many would blame the Jews for the situations in the Anglo countries.
But it’s certainly an interesting and at very least dignifiable/reasonable argument.
fuckin’ A bubba…
today i walk my dog. like i do every day. except for the fourth time some cunt complains.
“this is an on-leash area!”
as if i don’t know that.
“there’s a $500 fine!”
as if i care.
so i yell back to her…
“are you from around here?…
where were you born?”
“none of your bidness”, she says.
the four people who’ve had this totally absurd reaction are:
1. white trash woman
2. white trash man
3. samoan (or something) woman
4. a foreigner…sounded like a french guy…
fucking french people…
jerry lewis is NOT funny,
and my dog needs to run…
…
even worse is that my dog is:
1. an irish setter.
2. needs to run just to stay alive as his anus/rectum is almost 100% occluded by a huge tumor.
…
as the governor of my white trash state once said…
visit. but don’t stay.
Low class women seem more likely to complain about petty rule breaking than men & higher class women.
Perhaps they like you and just wanted an excuse to start a conversation or perhaps they were angry you never say hi and are taking revenge. Prole women go ballistic when men ignore them.
unfortunately i don’t know how to cut off a youtube vid…
just start it at the right point…
then it plays till the end of the original.
sometimes i wonder if there are any other autistic HBDers…other than peepee, lion, and steve shoe.
a recent commenter on shoe’s blog, flies over prof shoe’s head at 36,000 feet…
…
it’s not a matter of facts or the interpretation of facts…
…
it’s a matter of good and evil…
…
prof shoe is 100% stupid…
AND…
100% evil.
…
SOMETIMES THE FOREMOST OBJECTION TO THE TRUTH IS…
THAT IT IS THE TRUTH…
…
…
…
READ ‘EM AND WEEP.
I truly fear a future in which humans are genetically selected/designed according to this kind of synthetic “Adult-Attainment factor” criteria. To what extent do we engineer a future of “Stepford Wives” people algorithmically optimized for robotically, nihilistically “achieving” SES like a score in a video game?
Some of the most deeply unfulfilled, empty people I know are high-SES (especially in ways which would be captured quantitatively – intersubjectively within their communities, often much less so). People who I’d be equally unsurprised to hear bought a million dollar house or committed suicide.
How does one measure whether someone else’s life is authentic or fulfilling or meaningful?
I don’t see this as black and white, and I’m guessing there’s a lot of “low hanging fruit” genetically where improvements wouldn’t have concomitant negatives, but (especially considering unequal access to bleeding edge health care) I seriously worry that we’re uncritically taking a path towards an almost wholly reductionist, instrumentalist understanding and manipulation of humanity itself.
Sometimes i wonder if there are other schizophrenic HBD deniers besides you and Malcolm Gladwell (who claims to have seen a ghost)
normalizing the curve?
what fraction of people get a degree in math?
what fraction of math majors ever take a single actuarial exam?
“jeethuth chrisss!”
jeethuth chrisssth!
1. there’s no such thing as math IQ.
2. even if there were…non-verbal IQ and math IQ are NOT the same thing.
3. jews excel at math and the VIQ, and suck balls at everything else.
steve shoe is…
just another UN-subtle…
try-too-hard…
CHINK.
earth to massa.
come in massa.
normalizing the curve?
what fraction of people get a degree in math?
what fraction of math majors ever take a single actuarial exam?
Normalizing the curve of the people who took the test != the people who took the test are normal
indeed!
the distribution would be very skewed…to the right…
i expect my percentile for the whole population from that one test is not much more than…
how do i put it?
1 in not much more than 2x1600.
but no one has actually investigated very select populations.
have they?
all these hIQ societies, beyond the 1 in 1000 level, are full of shit.
after i sat the old GRE (i sat it only once), i called up the ETS and asked how rare a perfect score was…
this douche in p-town, nj, told me there were no stats on combined scores, only on the three subtests.
so i ax-ed the ISPI, the closest to a legit super high IQ society there is…
i actually got a response…
the answer was 1 in 10,000…for a CEILING score…which is what i made…800 800 800…the verbal 800 score was the “outlier”.
but who knows…
and who cares?
as i’ve said before, when the measure is just percentiles, then the difference between an IQ 200 or 1,000 or whatever steve shoe is high on…
and an IQ 140 could be only a few questions…or one…
like the difference of .01s in the 100m.
usain bolt is no secretariat.
autism kills.
http://gorillavid.in/z4vhmybqxbpe
for those who watched…
the lesson is…
On 3 June 2016, Petry tweeted in mockery of German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble; “Schäuble’s nightmare: the ‘incestuous’ Icelanders in the quarter-final.”[22] Iceland’s football team had made it to the UEFA Euro 2016 quarter-final and Schäuble had made a remark in June that if Europe were to isolate itself, this would cause Europe to degenerate into inbreeding.[23][24] Iceland is largely homogeneous in terms of demographics.[25][26] The Icelandic national team, which was drawn from a tiny pool of 330,000 Icelanders, had sent shock waves throughout the world when it upset the English national team in June with a 2-1 win.[27] The Guardian reports that all of the members of the team “were brought up in the Icelandic club system.”
let’s do it!
Football = prole
even the eurozone can’t get it together…
and never will!
there are only two possibilities:
1. fiscal union (not gonna happen. the EU’s federal govt now spends 1% what its constituent state governments spend…1%.)
2. disintegration (inevitable. but it may take another decade.)
and if even the euros can’t play together…
what hope is there for the multi-ethnic states of the new world?
that’s easy…
NONE!
America is ungovernable; those who served the revolution have plowed the sea.
first day of fall motherfuckers
Hello again!!!
I’d like PP and Videla/Mugabe to check out these podcast interviews of Greg Cochran and Steve Hsu:
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-519115521/interview-greg-cochran
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-519115521/steve-hsu-interview
Those AMAZING hbd-researchers… sad for me that i can’t check this spectacular interviews… oh boy!!
http://brainfodder.org/asch-conformity-experiment/
http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/intelligence-and-genetics
I’ve Just sent a link to the WAIS in Spanish (Chile, 1960) . See the tables in the end, They are the same but more readable, I think
PP, Now there is one more from me in your folder, with a question, if you don’t mind . And it was “hares”, not hair, of course 🙂
Good thing you told me. Your emails got accidentally sent to my junk folder. I’ll respond over the weekend.
Ok, great
preciosa!!!
this sad and clever eyes!!!
stop posting this faggot shit please.
modern art = bourgeois decadence = faggotry
Any idea what the I.Q threshold for undergrad math/ grad math is ?
I read Jensen say that 115 I.Q has no limits !
Have we overestimated the cognitive demands of many fields ?
http://isteve.blogspot.ie/2007/08/graduate-record-exam-scores-by-graduate.html
Mechanical engineers/compsci have the same verbal as ‘communications’ majors and just off ‘public admin’ ones.
Its not the absolute level, but the relative level of quant vs verbal that are good indicators of autist/schizo maybe.
If only we could figure out a foolproof way to measure levels of autists and schizo…
In general we’ve overestimated the IQ of everyone. People not only exaggerate or cherry pick their own IQs, but they do it for others they admire also. IQ inflation is a huge problem. The truth is, by the standards of most of history and most of the World, an IQ of 100 (modern white norms) is high. Marilyn Vos Savant called it “perfect intelligence”.
In general I don’t believe in thresholds because my sense is that the relationship between IQ and performance in all fields (from math to prostitution) is linear and probabilistic, but Steve Hsu has some research showing there is a threshold for doing math, though it’s not for IQ per se, but for math SAT scores:
http://infoproc.blogspot.ca/2010/05/psychometric-thresholds-for-physics-and.html
peepee only loves straight lines, because she doesn’t have one…
peepee will not post this comment.
senor cuervo is fucking me good…
speaking of disease and statistics…
this time cancer…
1. afaik there is only one disease (other than the genetic “disease” laron dwarfism) which is associated with very low IGF. that disease is cirrhosis of the liver.
2. laron dwarfs, who are deficient in IGF, are apparently immune to cancer. they die from other things at old ages; cancer is never the cause.
3. alcohol per se is not associated with liver cancer, but if alcohol abuse leads to cirrhosis then liver cancer is much more common.
a merely observational experiment which might shed light on what, if anything, can be done to reduce one’s risk of cancer…is…
are those who suffer from cirrhosis of the liver and consequent low IGF, significantly LESS likely to develop cancers other than liver cancer?
the data has likely already been collected. but by multiple groups.
basically people die from:
1. atherosclerosis (its risk factors and how to prevent it are known)
2. cancer (only some of its risk factors are known)
3. pneumonia, diabetes, accidents, etc.
the results of such an observational study as described above…
or that of a study…
wherein normal volunteers were treated with somatostatin, et al. (treatments for excessive IGF…acromegaly)…
in combination with…
the known dietary means of reducing IGF…
periodic fasting is the most potent…
and when combined with a vegan diet between fasts it may be as good as cirrhosis…idk…
…
do such (an affliction or a diet) result in the same elimination of cancer as a “decrement”…as is seen in laron dwarfs?
…
peepee is in love with fat-cancer victim rob ford…
1. cancer at < 50 years is very rare.
2. if all cancer were cured tomorrow…life expectancy would increase by 50% peepee) will never develop any cancer, not even non-melanoma skin cancer, in their lifetimes.
there it is again…the wordpress auto-censor…cutting out…i don’t remember exactly what…
…life expectancy would increase by not more than 3 years. more than 50% of people… will never develop any cancer…
in place of auto-censors or whatever the fuck you call it…
let’s do it!
auto-de-fe censer…
the most homophobic men are usually gay.
Case in point;
our very own Mugabe.
“Crazy mofo”
where’d you get the idea that i’m a homophobe?
oh!
you think i’m an hispano-phobe (and all hispanic men are gay) so therefore i’m a homophobe?
whatever ricky martin.
i don’t hate homos.
i wish them well, but i pity them.
Mugabe’s anger at the White proles has caused him to mock their defeat in the Civil War and be more sympathetic to Hillary Clinton.
“crazy mofo”
indeed!
that woman in the park and another thing really got to me.
i really hate those type of people.
but it doesn’t matter.
my state will go for hildebeest no matter what.
and i was going to vote a straight line for the dems anyway, but trump for president…which i still regard as the best possible outcome…that is, if everyone voted the same.
the 2 party system is inherently un-democratic.
it’s a farse.
…
but yes.
the civil war should never have been fought.
151 years since appomattox the south is still a different country.
which proves my point about nationalism again.
lincoln was a satanist.
i’ll have to change my picture to booth and my name to…
I KILLED HIM! AND I’LL DO IT AGAIN!
I KILLED HIM! AND I’LL DO IT AGAIN!
uhhh…
booth killed lincoln peepee.
you got that? right?
we train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won’t allow them to write “fuck” on their airplane…because?…it’s obscene.
this is trump-ism.
bravo!
But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself…
america is fubar.
forever.
Yes I know Booth killed Lincoln. But your comment reminded me of Sarah Silverman’s joke.
btw, sarah silverman is pretty attractive imho.
yet she’s apparently un-marriage-able.
and jesus was NOT a birkenstock type.
he wasn’t any type.
his type simply doesn’t exist in this world…
oh wait…
it did once.
turn up the volume.
yummi
you have subconscious desires with homo people….
and i don’t hate you my friend
i have pity about you
and specially about you
my hispanic friend!!
-)=)
BUT
the White South is generally pretty homogeneous;
Anglos, maybe a few Germans in Appalachia.
And if you’re going to blame Blacks for the poor cr@ckers in the South you need to get your head out of your arse and leave 1676 behind.
The NE took off, with English, Irish, Jews, Slavs, Italians & other Dagoes, Great Migration Blacks, etc.
most young “Jew broads” think Sarah Silverman’s crassness helps to give them a bad rap.
why racerealist hates Jews :).
This is supposed to take place in New Jersey.
I lold. Jewish women are ugly. I only date Italians.
Jews are such a diverse group, with varying degrees of Levantine and Northern European blood, that there is really no one ‘look’ Ashkenazi Jewish women have.
Much like African-Americans, it might be that gentile men would find a Jewess with more Northern European ancestry to be attractive (Levantines aren’t regarded as such here), same as how some men only like ‘heavily mixed’ Black women.
Some look like something out of a Hitler “Germanic beauty” poster;
It IS true, however, that by and large Jewesses have a lot more sex appeal/ more devious personalities than gentile White women.
Of course brave nipohispanic guy!!!
But none group have just a one look, 😉
Jews are such a diverse group, with varying degrees of Levantine and Northern European blood, that there is really no one ‘look’ Ashkenazi Jewish women have.
No they’re not you fucking moron.
They’re the least genetically diverse race on the planet.
Much less genetically diverse than whites.
And only gay guys find them attractive. You and Mugabe probably want to do their hair and makeup.
The real Jesus looked like a Palestinian, so yes, I have no doubt Sarah Silverman would kill him again:
This ”real jewsus” look like Lula, ex- barasilian praesident, LOL
”And only gay guys find them attractive.”
they who*
i find a lot of jewish guys attractive, because i tend to look ”little ashkenazistic” too, 😉
Partially correct,
but with a low IQ ‘spin’ as always;
Jews’ *Semitic portion* of their ancestry is the part of their ancestry. They are not even really Jewish in the other portion, and that’s what gives them diversity.
As I’ve said before the two in the above picture look nothing alike. Only someone with spatial abilities -4 SDs from the average, like your typical WN and you, could say otherwise with a straight face.
yeah.
only gay guys do NOT find a 6’3″ 200lb trans-sexual attractive.
jew-esses are usually gross. but a few of them are shtup-able. especially if they have blue eyes. unlike marsha. the only jew-ess i wanted to stick a one-four-seven to was half russian. the blue eyes were from her jewish side believe it or not.
What Marsha Murphy can’t understand is that…..
ancestral diversity and immediate relations to one another aren’t mutually exclusive because they are measured by different standards largely.
You share 2 grandparents with a cousin. You’re still very closely related to your ‘half Black’ cousin, but you look different, as I was pointing out with the Jews.
(duh!)
It *has* to be a troll.
btw, marcia brady…
am i right?
nine-darter to that snatch.
she even looked good in her early 40s, before she got fat and became speed-freak.
obviously Sarah Silverman was just trolling WN retards like Marsha.
Anglos are like the ‘old dinosaur’, Jews are like the smaller more intelligent mammals that are rising up.
‘tards gonna tard.
something tells me the real jesus was like al pacino.
super intense, swart, and short.
“something tells me the real jesus was like al pacino.
super intense, swart, and short.”
As proven by her knocking herself out with the ‘Jewish diversity issue’ (a very LOW level of abstraction seen);
1. Marsha is either a moron who just parrots Mugabe talking points in her low-IQ way
OR
2. Mugabe’s simpleton alternate personality.
A vastly disproportionate percentage of Jewesses are dykes;
that’s one issue.
Many are naturally small framed from the semitic ancestral portion, and hence naturally put on a lot of weight.
But they DO have the best hair.
and are minxes.
there are pros and cons.
Likewise, Jewesses don’t seem to age, either.
regardless of plastic surgery, no 81 year old Gentile White looks this young.
Nor any 68 year old Gentile man.
”As I’ve said before the two in the above picture look nothing alike. Only someone with spatial abilities -4 SDs from the average, like your typical WN and you, could say otherwise with a straight face.”
No Chin,
to compare face similarities none don’t need to have a great spatial skills.
Facial recognition is not correlated with any particular cognitive traits, 😉
It’s pure pattern recognition, a general, omniscient cognitive trait.
very similar nose shape,
arched eyebowns,
high cheeckbones.
”your TYPICAL WN”
i’m not typical WN first because i’m not nationalist, at least based on usual criteria to be nationalist or ”white” if i’m partially semitic, i can’t be fully white, i mean, predominantly european.
😛
”Anglos are like the ‘old dinosaur’, Jews are like the smaller more intelligent mammals that are rising up.
‘tards gonna tard.”
Very funny analogy Hispanese!!! huahahahahaha
smaller mamals like that
I really never got that stereotype.
Jews have long and hooked noses on average, or long*er*, but so do Italians.
Iberians have longer noses, but they’re more often than not, straight, and not hooked, as I’m sure JS can attest to.
My only sympathies with White Nationalists, are that I do understand to an extent that Demography is destiny.
And I appreciate what Caucasians (ALL of them, not just Europeans), have done historically. Muh’ ‘moderation of traits’.
Aquiline noses on Italian women are beautiful. This is not so for Jews.
I happen to think, although they have different strengths and weaknesses, Jewesses and gentile European women are about the same in physical attractiveness.
But you have your views, I have mind.
Anyhow, I would suspect that Jewish noses are more “hooked” than “Aquiline”. Aquiline is supposed to just denote a small curve on the bottom of the front of the nose. “Hooked” is more than that.
sometimes the man is the object…
90% of the time…
roll me in designer sheets…
i’ll never get enough…
share the wine.
So
”interesting”, insightfull!!!!!!
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/dalai_lama_0041tpk_s.jpg?quality=85&w=749
The only difference between alcoholism and crack-addiction is that the first is more lucrative, so it pass as a ”normal” or ”acceptable” but incurable alcoholics usually look similarly hopeless just like crackers.
Pumpkin Person blog become the psychiatrich couch to the many people here, oooh Pumpkin, you’re inspiring!!!
PP
I read the links and other steve hsu stuff on it , but do you think its possible to use the data he got from university of oregan students and then say that to get mostly As in college physics/math you need to be in the 85th-90th percentile of SAT-math?
How rigerouse is oregan ?
Has there ever been a study in which they gave people a real IQ test like the WAIS or ravens and then gave a cutoff for college math ?
If I had to guess I would say 120 on a ravens like test
What number would you guys give? most people give crazy numbers like 145, which is ridiculous
http://consciouslifenews.com/genes-make-lonely-study-finds-loneliness-heritable-trait/11126114/
Loneliness is not heritable, the vulnerability to the individual-environment/variables interactions that can be understood as ”heritable”, but environmental variables also matter to compose this equation.
Generally lonely people no find most people who can fit with them: personality, sexuality, beliefs, etc and this will be pretty variable, you can fit yourself with 1% of people in city A, 50% of people in the city B and 90% of people in the city C.
Lonely is not the primary behavioral/organically behavioral action.
Is the result, the product of his primary actions, his secundary reactions and this long term composite.
what makes ”genetic of loneliness” visible is the fact that human characteristics and criteria to the ”adaptation” tend to be similar throughout the world, in the same way, ”weirdness” tend to be universally similar–”identified” or classified,
in the same way schizophrenia genes can be identifiable/visible,
popularity criteria is a universal human value that may tend to cor-relate with broader spectrum of the genetic disorders such mental disorders.
Other aspect of the prone-loneliness people is their tendency to be unique (have unique personalities), so % of the people around that can fit with them tend to be considerably reduced.
#autismhurts
Marsha Murphy (Mugabe pseudonym) seems to think that Jews can’t have any large difference in ancestry because they are ‘so closely related to each other’.
They’re no more than 3rd cousins to each other at most. That means they share 6% of their autosomal DNA, and can have 94% differences in the ‘Dark Caucasoid- European’ autosomal ancestry.
I suppose autistic Marsha believed they were closely related than that?
She can’t take KMac with a grain of salt.
Pathetic.
“New Santo” should tone down his hatred of The Tribe.
I’m not a fan of a lot of ‘the elite’s’ of them’s behavior in recent years, but there’s no reason to insult their appearance by comparing them to rats!
I hear Mel Gibson is making a new movie on Jesus’ resurrection.
http://www.jpost.com/Christian-News/Mel-Gibson-confirms-new-film-project-on-Jesus-resurrection-466737
More butthurt from the Jews.
Jews do look like rats.
It appears PP was right about Ted Cruz.
Lol
Will I just saw one of your comments at Lindsay’s blog. Hitler does not have Semetic Y dna.
It wasn’t an accurate source, but it would be a testament to ‘Jew dysfunction’ if true….
self-hate is somewhat prominent among Jews, although it’s generally a myth in NAMs.
It may have come from Berbers, says wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_haplogroups_of_historic_people
To clarify;
I’m far more Jew cynical than your average American.
I’m pretty confident that Israel will expand into Syria, enabled by a ‘false flag’ Isis attack on a few of their own….I’m just waiting for it.
And the Ashkenazis, especially the American ones, are abusing the other Jews in Israel. God knows what will happen to them.
I find it difficult to believe that “the events of 70 years ago” [(((PP))) has made it a trigger word] were fake. After all the lead-up with propaganda and such, it seems like the natural conclusion.
But there are many other genocides of similiar brutality and quantity not given as much air time;
Slavs in WW2, and Rwanda.
I’m failing to see why the last comment still got flagged.
”self-hate is somewhat prominent among Jews, although it’s generally a myth in NAMs.”
It’s not a self hate my friend, it’s fair play or rational morality.
if my group have commited a lot of crimes in the past, in the present, why i should be proud about it/them*
Jews feel guilty about some of their ethnocentrism; the treatment of “dark Caucasoids” and the censorship of mention of their “obscenely disproportionate influence” in other countries.
Historically, IDK.
there are obviously racial differences in things, but there are things that have always divided us more than race.
I really don’t see what a cr@cker in the south has to be proud of.
Yeah, maybe Sir Isaac Newton was Anglo, but are they related to Sir Isaac Newton?
Did their ancestors help him in any way shape or form?
NO!
LOL!
The slaves did more.
Yes, in the end the ethnocentrism is also the coletivization of the individual achievements just like
”Aisaac Newton was a white genius… the same race i’m”
”my race made geniuses”
”my race is more creative, we are more creative”
yup
😄
They accuse (((Ayn Rand))) of having ulterior motives;
Libertarianism means individualism for Gentiles while Jews get to practice tribalism.
An absurd degree of tribalism can be bad, in that people already have big egos solely because of their race, and have no drive to succeed, or challenge their status as we saw in the American South with some….
but Tribalism in the true Nationalist sense, the “out of sight out of mind” doesn’t have that effect.
1. the individualist ideology is strongest in the anglo-sphere.
2. hence, so are the jews. when tribalism is not acknowledged as a social force…when “there is no such thing as society”…naturally the more tribal peoples will come to dominate such societies…if they have any talent at all.
3. the individualist ideology really is an ideology…in that, as marx said, “they don’t know it, but they do it.”…or as zizek said it is “an unknown known”.
that is, it is a set of false assumptions about “how the world works” which determines opinion and is unknown qua set of assumptions and determiner of opinion.
4. HBDers are without exception the sock puppets of the individualist ideology…but, by definition, they don’t know it. but so are the “anti-racists”.
this is seen clearly in the in-ability to distinguish between nationalism and supremacism. in the minds of the “anti-racists” these are the same thing.
The problem with many libertarians is they autisticly assume folks are only motivated by financial greed, and thus we don’t need affirmative action because the market forces us to hire the best person regardless of tribe.
But many are more motivated by genetic greed than financial greed and will even lose money hiring an imcompetent co-ethnic if it means helping their tribe
The Ivy League neocons were motivated by genetic greed, but since most don’t realize that’s a motive, they were able to blame the Iraq war on the financial greed of corporate Cheney and slither away
I agree about points 1 and 2.
#1 is supposed to be a Protestant thing (which makes sense considering differences in emphasize on ‘talking to God’ being through a priest with Cat-lickers but on your own with Protestants)
#2 No kidding.
But I don’t quite follow #s 3 and 4….
could you elaborate?
Yeah, it seems PP’s comment is pretty darn near the truth to me.
it’s certainly ironic that NeoCons are a more ‘elite’ type group in the Jewish community, while the vast majority vote Democrat and against Bush’s actions.
You’d expect the higher IQ people to be less tribal.
I guess it’s just an exception.
“we’re all mixed.”
is an example of a point of ideology in latin america.
so is sammy sosa’s bleaching himself.
being non-white in latin america is so un-acceptable that the 99% believe they are white or believe that they are no less white than the 1%…and some of the 1% may believe this themselves.
ideology goes both ways.
1. it’s the 1% justifying their position.
2. it’s the 99% justifying the position of the 1%.
OR
1. it’s the 1% lying about the differences between themselves and the 99%…including to themselves.
2. it’s the 99% believing there are no differences, except differences in “luck”.
…
even if social stratification of the latin american variety were somehow explained by innate/genetic differences. this would NOT justify them.
ideology in its most general sense is the “just world phenomenon”. it’s a general bias of humans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology#Marxist_view
HBDers are just sockpuppets of the individualist ideology, because they…
1. explain all social phenomena as somehow emerging from atomic individuals with various characteristics.
2. deny that, when it comes to psychological traits, GxE has any significance.
3. needless to say it goes both ways again:
a. a world without society is much simpler…more “elegant”.
b. individuals want to believe that “who they are” is not contingent on their particular time and place.
Mexico is a country that is autosomally 67% European according to wikipedia.
In terms of the racial classifications of people;
53% Pure European
26% Mestizo (on average half and half)
18% Amerind
2% Mulatto
1% other
yet 80% identify as Mestizo.
It was a movement to create “one Mexican identity” in the early 1900s.
To fool the EGIs of each of the major ethnic/racial groups into thinking “we’re all the same” and not resenting the people on top.
Ten percent of Mexico’s population also traces their roots directly to Spain. This is the ruling class.
I think that figure is underexaggerated. Figures of autosomal ancestry for the whole population consistently come back well over 50%.
Unless they have an insane one drop rule there’s no way just 10% are White
< 10% of mexicans are un-mixed europeans.
but 10% identify as such, or pass as such.
have you seen mexicans?
the same goes for costa rica and chile.
these two identify as white even though un-mixed europeans are a small minority.
of latin american countries: only in brazil, argentina, uruguay, and cuba are unmixed europeans > 20% of the population.
“Have you seen Mexicans”….
Mugabe has lost his subtlety.
A White Mexican is going to by definition blend in with other Whites, so you’re not going to observe him as Mexican.
#autismhurts
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s no longer the case in Cuba, though.
Chile?
come on….Patagonia didn’t have many Indians to begin with; the desert of Chile is the driest on earth.
Probably true about Costa Rica.
when i lived in la the handyman had an accent.
“are you from argentina?” i asked.
“no. from tijuana.”
#autismhurtsinthebuttjustlikewilllikesit
I’m…
Latrinos are brainwashed and you can’t rely on “self identification” to even the slightest degree.
You literally have to round up a bunch of those Schizo mofos and take a saliva sample.
AND,
not that I really care, but I’m not homosexual.
As I’ve said before I’m mainly Celibate.
But I have a big head.
Rushton’s theory was correct.
”Mexico is a country that is autosomally 67% European according to wikipedia.
In terms of the racial classifications of people;
53% Pure European”
😒
😄
🙏
Because lack of objectivity of the racial criteria in latina mérica, in contrast with angloa mérica,
relatively less phenotypical differences between iberians and mixed types, specially castizos, for example, in contrast with anglo-saxons,
is more difficult to really know the % of ”pure” whites, specially in countries such a Costa Rica and Chi chi le le.
Seems, Mexico, Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguai, Brazil and even other nations like Venezuela and Colombia was whiter than today.
Racial demographic changes in Brazil and in other latin american countries has been faster and significative.
Well, right it’s impossible to tell exactly who has purity and who doesn’t, Santo is correct.
But it’s the best I can guesstimate given the sources I have.
A study of 1000+ Cubans selected by melanin indices maxed out at 98% European autosomally (averaged 86% for “Whites”)…
Purity is a joke.
But who the hell cares if someone is 1/8 American Indian?
It’s really trivial.
Source?
”Well, right it’s impossible to tell exactly who has purity and who doesn’t, Santo is correct.”
the term ”pure” is not just old fashioned, it’s absolutely inaccurate.
the semantically correct term to categorize racial groups is ”decanted” or less decanted = more mixed”.
there is two types of racial decantation:
via endogamy (marry relatives, same family)
via ”racial ‘endogamy”’ (marry people of the same familial ‘race’ ”or’ ethnicity)
seems, we can have a mixed-race population with greater degree of endogamy/lower genetic diversity: mena populations*’
and a decanted-race (”purified”) population with greater degree of exogamy/higher genetic diversity…. and based on hbd theories, northern european populations should have higher (phenotypical*) genetic diversity caused by long term endogamy, or at least a discrete genetic diversity.
but
https://www.quora.com/Which-European-countries-have-the-highest-and-lowest-rates-of-genetic-diversity
well maybe northern europeans are/tend to be more behaviorally (a kind of ”genetically diverse”) diverse.
you don’t need mix with other groups to increase the genetic diversity of your group, you can increase the already-existent genetic diversity of your group, or not….
decantation is not purification, the first is the reduction of the ”foreign” elements, desselecting some ….but/and selecting others. Purification seems to be a extreme form of decantation and in the case of genetic stuff would speciation, eliminating the possibility of flow gene among other genetically related group.
purification also can be understood such a extreme enphasis to the certain path, too much to the north, too much to the south…
north pole and south pole are more ”pured” than subtropical or mediterranean climates.
Humans would be a purified version of the correlated mammal species. or not, or i’m just talking shit,
🙏
https://www.meetic.it/unlogged/landing/2016/05/30/hpv-belowthefold-3steps-geo-psc-cooking?klid=6724&ktid=0
✊
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004488
“Estimates of admixture proportions were obtained with the program ADMIXMAP, using data from 128 AIMs. In the total sample, the average European, African and Native American contributions were 72% (range 4.3% to 98.2%)”
”In the total sample, the average European, African and Native American contributions were 72% (range 4.3% to 98.2%), … 20% (range 0.8% to 95.2%) and 8% (range 0.4% to 34%)”
”As indicated above, 55% of the participants self-reported to be “blanco”, 33% “mestizo” and 12% “negro”. These proportions are similar to those based on the report of an external observer; there were discrepancies for only 65 out of the 1019 individuals. Several measures of concordance indicated excellent agreement between both classifications (Cohen’s kappa = 0.8873 [17], Ciccheti-Allison’s kappa = 0.9091 [18] and Fleiss-Cohen’s kappa = 0.9345 [19]).
Age did not have a significant effect on melanin levels (M), measured quantitatively with the reflectometer (melanin index) [20], but there were significant differences in melanin index by sex (males M = 40.68±10.7; females M = 39.17±9.45; P = 0.015). The average melanin index of the total sample was 39.8, but there was a broad distribution of values, from 23.4 to 85.9. In individuals who self-reported to be “blanco”, the average melanin index was 34.06±3.70 (mean ± SD), in those who self-reported to be “mestizo” 41.69±6.29 and in those who self-reported to be “negro” 60.59±8.87 (Figure 2). The differences in melanin levels between census groups were significant (ANOVA with sex as a covariate: F = 4.30, P<0.001).''
''A study of 1000+ Cubans selected by melanin indices maxed out at 98% European autosomally (averaged 86% for “Whites”)…
Purity is a joke.
But who the hell cares if someone is 1/8 American Indian?
It’s really trivial.''
Sorry my friend Japanic but your evidences don't appear to be evident about what you are advocating… 🙏
''A study of 1000+ Cubans selected by melanin indices maxed out at 98% European autosomally (averaged 86% for “Whites”''
I don't understand this sentence, 🙏
''The levels of pigmentation show a strong correlation with the estimates of individual ancestry proportions obtained with the panel of AIMs. African ancestry was positively correlated with the melanin index (Spearman's rho = 0.632, P<0.001), and European ancestry was inversely correlated with melanin index (rho = −0.659, P<0.001). No significant correlation was observed between Native American ancestry and melanin index (rho = 0.0547, P = 0.0809).''
😆
Santo-
the point is 100% purity does not exist in Cuba.
The research supports that.
100 percent purity exists nowhere.
tell that to Mugabe.
yeah.
’cause cuba is just like norway.
…
nispanic says:
1. “demography is destiny.”
2. “we’re all mixed”, so it doesn’t matter.
1 is true.
2 is false.
#satanismhurts
Seeems
Mugaby enjoy more hollywood movies (made in Murrica prole, jew-cock sucking) than a vg hispano-americano (”la raza”)…
Hispanese,
you say ”small mammals”…
there are more “small mammals” than rodents.
I thought rodents were all crushed/eaten by gigantic boa constrictors in Brazil 😉
”I thought rodents were all crushed/eaten by gigantic boa constrictors in Brazil😉”
☺
Inspiring and dignificant!!!!
I’m not anti-armenitic
http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/4879360/1/
PP thoughts on guns Germs and Steel? Have you read it before?
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/09/25/guns-germs-and-steel-a-refutation/
I watched the 3 part documentary a long while ago. I believe Taylor offers a fairly accurate estimation about why Papua New Guinea isn’t as advanced as New York c 1955.
Environment matters.
Genes adapt.
Environment matters.
Genes…change environment into farmland/state/police….
Environment matters less.
Genes change.
Very complicated helix going on. You have “shocks” like famine, war, resource depletion and of course disease.
Peter Frost has extended Jared Taylors analysis in his writings. You may want to check it out.
Anthropology is a very worthy area of investigation if you’re into HBD. But like psychology, the Blank Slate has culled anything worth saying after about 1960.
who’s that guy in your picture?
I learned that
worst the environment, more efficient will be the selection.
only the fittest will survive…
”double relaxed selective pressures cause deleterious accumulation”
so, why better environment (relaxation of the selective pressures) would more efficient to increase intelligence or at least health than a worst environment*
would not the opposite*
I’ve talked about it here but no one answered or not answered my question directly…
😷
I’ve talked about it here but no one answered or not answered my question directly…
🐸
still expecting…
American Gigolo will cure santa claus of his butt love.
a homo-phobic movie about fags.
made in 1980…before AIDS.
#9 on ebert’s list of the year’s 10 best.
👌
👆
👌
👆
O:)
3:)
”He hate american proles, but love to watch american prole jew-movies”
So true, so right!!
Bugaby,
out of closet man!!!
there is a 🌈 to you discover…
”made in 1980…before AIDS.”