It’s my favorite time of the year. The leaves are changing color, hot chocolate is being served, horror films are streaming , and most important of all, Forbes just released their annual ranking of the 400 richest Americans.
The bad news? Just when blacks other than Oprah started becoming billionaires, billionaire status is no longer enough to be super rich. Sadly, as soon as a black achieve something, it’s no longer prestigious, kind of like when blacks move into a neighborhood, the house values decline because people move out. When a black became President, suddenly it was possible for orange game show hosts to do so too, and now that some blacks are finally billionaires, billionaire status is no longer that rich.
In fact, over a decade after Oprah became the first multi-billionaire black in American history, even several billion dollars is no longer enough to be super rich. This year you need an astonishing $3.8 billion just to rank dead last behind hundreds of much richer people.
One famous heiress from a very wealthy old money family wanted Forbes not to include her on their list so she could stay anonymous, only to be told “don’t worry you don’t qualify”. The woman went absolutely ballistic calling the Forbes reporter a “F@CKING C@NT! F@CKING WH@RE!!!!”.
Although some Old Money prefer their wealth to be downplayed, they want this to be their choice. Old money is very concerned that they’ve been kicked out of the rich club by a new generation of snot nosed computer geeks and investment bankers who they simply don’t have the IQ to compete with.
Despite being 13% of America, only 1% of the Forbes 400 (4 people) is black this year and that actually represents an all time high. For most of the list’s history, there were either no blacks or just one (usually Oprah) however even this all time high of 1% is misleading because half of them are arguably mulatto or even what racists used to call quadroon.
For centuries it’s been known that brain size is at least slightly linked to IQ which from a Darwinian perspective, should be at least slightly linked to wealth. Thus it’s absolutely fascinating that for decades, the richest black in America donned freakishly huge hats.
More recently, it’s been suggested that Ashkenazi ancestry is linked to high IQ (via genetic diseases like Tay Sachs) and so it’s equally fascinating that the man who has replaced Oprah as America’s richest “black” has a Jewish father and is probably the most intelligent black billionaire since Oprah herself. Although his politics are unevolved, he boasts a bachelor of Arts/Science from Haverford College and Doctor of Jurisprudence from Stanford University.
With a net worth of 11 figures, he’s far richer than Oprah ever was, but is he adaptable enough to hold the title of richest black in America for decades like she did, or is he just another flash in the pan, who will be pushed into the dustbin of black history by the next generation of new money? .
Pumpkin Person 
He looks a lot more jewish than black. Even Malcom Gladwell looks more black.
Both the richest actual blacks got their money from PE.
I think PE is fine, but its not really….lets just say I would even respect Oprah’s of 50 cent’s source of wealth more as demonstrative of talent.
If you look at the real numbers and not the fake forbes list. About 33% of billionaires get money from finance. 33% from tech and the rest from other stuff like oil or such. In america.
In China, the proportion of billionaires that come from finance (that jewish industry) is….5%.
Hahaha.
All the stats on billionaires come from Forbes so no idea by what source you call them fake. Obviously, they’re rough estimates but at least it’s a consistent metric that can be used to track trends over time.
There’s also a Bloomberg list eh?
https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires
I prefer Forbes because they’ve been doing this for decades so you can track historic trends using the same method.
50 cent is probably more intelligent than Clarence Thomas or Teh Nesi Coates or Oprah. Hes not controlled by jews which already shows superior integrity and social IQ.
The 2 black billionaires on the list are in PE and therefore their boss is jewish.
Teh Nesi Coates would basically be another homeless schizo without jewish ‘support’.
I can’t name 1 rich black person whose wealth is not derived from serving jews. Name 1 and ill make a BLM celebration video (in Hebrew, like its funders)
Don’t say controlled by Jews because then you’re spreading hate against all the good Jews who OPPOSE the neocons and spreading hate against everyday innocent people is evil, no different from the Zionist extremists who want to genocide Palestinians.
Now if you mean not controlled by neocons or Zionists, when did 50 cent ever defend Palestinians like Coates did or loudly turn against the Iraq War before it began like Oprah did?
If Coates mentioned Gaza, then I take it back. Some puppets, such as in our comment section, are not allowed even mention the word ‘Gaza’.
Mentioned it? He wrote a whole book about it. You are such a bad judge of character. You see a black face and just assume he’s an empty suit.
Some puppets, such as in our comment section, are not allowed even mention the word ‘Gaza’.
LOL! You still think Melo and RR are Mossad agents? Wow I must be really important if Mossad is sending 2 agents to infiltrate my blog. Get it through your thick skull that you have BAD judgement. You think real things are fake (RR, Melo, Forbes) and fake thinks are real (the fictional billionaire hooker I convinced you wanted to screw you; lol the arrogance of you thinking a BILLIONAIRE would be interested in you lol). You have BAD judgement but unfortunately because you’re arguably schiz and Crespi argues that’s the opposite of autism, so now you have delusions of social genius.
It doesn’t work that way. True schiz are never social geniuses just like true autists are never math geniuses. Just as Rain Man was too autistic to be a legit math genius in a culturally significant sense, you are too schiz to be socially intelligent when it comes to truly complex issues. .
But the first degree relatives of autists and schiz might be mathematically and socially intelligent respectively. But you; you’re too far gone. Capiche?
Why am I wasting my life talking to a crazy person? I feel like Loomis in Rob Zombie’s Halloween remake:
And I’m almost never wrong. Except Kanye and Mark robinson and Candace.
But all the black celebs, rappers, pols, models, groups, and academics are completely and totally controlled by the jews. Literally to the point of telling them what to wear, where to live and what to say in their songs.
An actual Mossad agent would say the Epstein files don’t exist.
Lmao that is so true
If 50 cent ran for president or congress, [redacted by pp, Sept 12, 2025] would make all the other black celebs and politicians denounce him as a terrorist and theyd realease about a million sleazy articles and videos to show he’s dumb or evil.
Its not that 50 cent wouldn’t agree with Teh Nesi Coates. Its that they don’t have total control over him which worries them. This is the same reason neocons oppose trump.
They don’t have total control over any President. The neocons were not able to get Clinton to invade Iraq or get Obama or Biden to go to war with Iraq. They even had to work their ass off to get Bush to do so with Cheney telling Wolfawitz to stop obsessing about Iraq because it was annoying Bush so much. They’re the single most powerful interest group, but they’re not omnipotent. Bibi who I would consider too extreme for even the neocons has got more mileage out of Trump than from any previous President.
“More recently, it’s been suggested that Ashkenazi ancestry is linked to high IQ (via genetic diseases like Tay Sachs)”
Its “been suggested”, but the Cochran and Harpending “predictions” are false.
Drink some shutup juice. Go back to the CNN comment section.
I like strawberry lemonade.
Even though I like Cochran’s theory it’d be fun seeing him get discredit because he’s so full himself blocking anyone the second they disagree with him in even the mildest way.
I mean, it is an interesting theory, but the empirical data doesn’t fit. Cochran seems like he has a personality issue. Knowledgeable guy, too pompous.
RR have you thougt about relocating to israel. It would save on Zoom subscription fees.
So denying Jewish supremacy makes RR and Israeli? Wow that is some hardcore scizo logic. LOL
Puppy. This is more a philosophical question and I also posted on the Mensa forum.
But why do some high IQ people not see obviously fake stuff?
The Iraq WMD is laughably fake.
BLM.
That anthrax….
JFK
PE accounting
Will Smith’s Oscar
And my argument is that being of a certain neurotype is more important than being intelligent for seeing the truth.
Stephen Pinker talks about this; he says because knowing the truth about such high level issues was not needed to survive so we didn’t evolve to be good at it.
Nuclear wheapons are actually fake. Nuclear reaction is not explosive. It is a hoax , a scam. Even smart people have fell for this scam.
Einstein`s relativity theory is another hoax. There is no time dilation and space contraction. All scam and hoax.
I got double digit IQ and I see through all of those obvious scams.
Really intelligent people DO see conspiracies as false.
Perhaps Pinker is partially correct but I think it’s more of a bell curve thing, where you either have to be quite high IQ to see the falsity behind conspiracies without being specifically trained about it. If you are trained to see it you can be lower IQ (I.e. if you have specific understanding about the necessary physics, economic needs, or direct knowledge etc. to explain something in a conspiracy). An lower or average IQ person who is prone to conspiratorial thinking might see many conspiracies but will have more false positives and false negatives (low correct average)
Lurker
Its the 3 musketeers:
1 Schiz
2. High T
3. Very high VIQ
These are immune from priests.
Gallup just realeased a poll saying open borders has record support!
Hahahaha.
Hahahahaha.
So in a medium IQ person mind. They have to join the fact that dems have a 34% approval rating with a world in which, Trump won the popular vote on a secret army of russian bot voters?
Hahahaha.
The funniest thing I ever saw was those hackers who rigged a newscast and made funny Asian names…
SUM-TING-WONG
Its called Mosaic Theory puppy. If some sources are inaccurate you have to use alternative ‘data’ to cleanse the ‘official’ data. Some day when you learn data analysis you will come across it.
Really Pumpkin? So, you’ll argue with someone who’s not even real about Jewish conspiracies, but I can’t talk about how Charlie Kirk was SHOT IN THE THROAT FOR BEING A RACIST CUCK?
Are you afraid Oprah’s going to see this blog and not let you come on her show?
Let’s be real, if your asinine conspiracies are true, then the bot will get you canceled long before me.
Finally, the TRUTH is starting to come out.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/692522/surge-concern-immigration-abated.asp
Gallup, one of the most accurate pollsters, has confirmed what I’ve known for years.
People think immigration is good for the country.
The word “empathy” is from the 20th century. So per his own words, don’t show him any “new age term” that “does a lot of damage”?
Seeing people decrying the memes and even diss tracks about Kirk who were posting racist memes about high profile murders of black Americans is the definition of “selective outrage.”
Amazingly, but not surprisingly, you guys are so stupid that you don’t even realize that wasn’t the full quote. (Before you speak about the character of someone who was just assassinated you should learn something about them, if you’re not a piece of shit that is… but clearly you guys are, because you have the dying need to be “right” because you are still obsessed with status instead of morals, even though you feel guilty and convince yourself you aren’t)
lmao. I know it’s not the full quote moron, but the rest of it doesn’t make it any better. He basically says “sympathy” is better which makes no fucking sense.
Literally just pseudo-intellectual nonsense.
Prove that it’s post-intellectual nonsense then.
Sympathy (to him) = caring about the plight of others but not feeling what they feel.
Empathy = Feeling what the other person feels (which often leads to you THINKING you feel something when it isn’t actually there, or you recontextualize it)
I’m sorry that you don’t care about the truth, but OK.
“Sympathy” is from the 1600s while “empathy” is from the 1900s. But that doesn’t change the FEELING that one gets that’s empathetic/sympathetic. So while one word is newer – even though the feeling existed before the word – does that follow as “new age”, as Kirk claimed? At the end of the day, the claim that is “new age” is false.
I shouldn’t have to say that his murder shouldn’t have happened, but pretending like this guy had “good views” and “lived like a Christian *is laughable.
It probably is better to develop sympathy for a person’s circumstances rather than spend time trying to understand what a person is feeling, why he feels that way, and what should be done with that knowledge. Empathy is mentally exhausting to even attempt, sympathy within a political context is practical, and arguably actually possible. I can see why a rightest would be annoyed by the word empathy.
This is gonna sound reddit AF but, compassion > empathy
Karp mother who is black, very light skin, is very peculiar, look at this article of 1958 :
Chicago High School Grad Wins Trip To Israel An 18-year-old June graduate of Crane High School was the only Negro among four winners of a six-week study tour to Israel, and is currently attending work- shops there as guest of the Chicago Women’s Division of the American Jewish Con-
gress. Leah A. Jaynes, who competed against 400 students from different parts of the country, submitted a winning essay
on “Why I Want To Attend A Summer
Miss Jaynes Workshop In Israel.” She is the youngest and only girl of the four winners, among whom are an Oxford Univerversity Rhodes scholar and a Harvard graduate student.
Interesting. I haven’t seen a picture of her but judging from her son’s phenotype, I suspect she’s at least half Caucasoid.
I like Kyle but like Cenk hes not HBD aware. So he frames everything in Gaza as trumps fault….
Again, is this an IQ issue or a neurotype issue?
He said the Iraq War was for oil.
I mean…..
20 years later and they are still doing that line?
What puppy never wants to debate. Because his VIQ is in the toilet. Is whether high IQ have a ‘right’ to dominate Low IQ (gentiles).
Thoughts?
Alex Karp says we need to use data analytics to highlight peoples social media comments on Israel….
Uh…nation states have soverignty?
Except for Israel. Super sovereignty. Bomb Qatar. heh heh Heh.
Because his VIQ is in the toilet.
LOL!
Is whether high IQ have a ‘right’ to dominate Low IQ (gentiles).
As I’ve said a million times, Ashkenazi dominate white and Middle Eastern gentiles (basically their 2 parent races), white and Middle Eastern gentiles have historically dominated Bantu, Bantu dominate Buhmen and pygmies, Bushmen and pygmies dominate animals, animals dominate plants. The domination hierarchy is largely an IQ hierarchy. Do they have a right to? Not when they do in a way that increases net suffering.
Alex Karp says we need to use data analytics to highlight peoples social media comments on Israel….
I strongly disagree with that, but as a Jewish man his loyalty to Israel at least makes sense from an evolutionary perspective.
The bigger mystery is why does Peter Theil go along with this? The fact a white gentile would be be using his power to advance the interests of a race that is dominating his own make me question his (social) intelligence as does his weird obsession with the antichrist. On the other hand, it’s made him obscenely rich so maybe that’s all he cares about.
Not when they do in a way that increases net suffering.
Agree
‘the interests of a race that is dominating his own’
May I remind you that billionaires don’t really have a race? Thiel has no reason to care about any of this stuff. He probably just wants to keep powerful allies.
May I remind you that billionaires don’t really have a race?
Huh?
Thiel has no reason to care about any of this stuff.
No one has any reason to care about anything but sadly evolution selected us to be tribal, but maybe he’s less tribal than most. Either that or he’s confused about what tribe he belongs to.
I think you can understand what I mean by saying they don’t really have a race. I trust you.
[redacted by pp, 2025-09-13]We are in a weird prisoner’s dilemma. No matter what we do, it isn’t enough.
Biden, Obama, Cenk Uyger, David Pakman, Ezra Klein, AOC, and a million other democratic lawmakers, media pundits and influencers have come out and condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, yet we have the Republican President of the United States, and his entire administration, including Elon Musk, and people on Fox News blaming Democrats and using Charlie’s death as a way to stoke division and further radicalize their base.
They even fired a guy from MSNBC for criticizing Kirk.
Again, when those Minnesota Law Makers were murdered in cold blood by a right-wing lunatic, where were the flags at half-mast? Why didn’t the people making fun of them on Fox News get fired?
IT’S ALL FAKE.
Why did you redact that first sentence? That doesn’t even make sense.
It’s a very sensitive time. Emotions are running high.
They even fired a guy from MSNBC for criticizing Kirk
Of course they did. They don’t want to be blamed for creating a climate that led to his assassination. They’d start losing advertisers and worse.
Again, when those Minnesota Law Makers were murdered in cold blood by a right-wing lunatic, where were the flags at half-mast? Why didn’t the people making fun of them on Fox News get fired?
No disrespect to them but they were not as influential as Charlie Kirk.
You could make that argument, but that’s not the point. They were murdered due to political extremism and republicans didn’t give a shit because they were democrats.
Politics and media are two of the most psychopathic fields in existence. Don’t expect moral or intellectual consistency.
I definitely expect that because that’s the standard you need to hold your elected officials to.
Political apathy is low IQ.
Demand it but don’t expect it
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1967236559238770752
Calculate all you once, you can’t say it’s “fake” when there were LGBTQ flags at the White House, all over the country and black squares and press meetings and laws changed due to the death of a guy who was unfortunate enough to be in bad health, on an illicit substance, and have a long criminal history when he got forcibly arrested (Floyd).
For BLM alone:
Juneteenth, taking the knee, public apologies by politicians, statues removed, renaming of military bases.
Hey Melo, just shut the fuck up already and stop thinking you’re some great person.
Just to clarify the above comment is from Policy Wonk
Just to be clear, this is how fucking retarded these morons are.
They think the BLM protests are the same as the Charlie Kirk situation.
And yeah, I figured it wasn’t Mugs because it sounds like a sober person wrote it.
Thiel is autistic hes not going to help us.
The only race of man to evole high iq without throwing their social IQ into the toilet is the jews.
Because they evoled to be [redacted by pp, 2025-09-13]
Not being able to tell fake from real.
Thats a very big problem for you.
Look. I can’t tell myself sometimes.
But this Gallup poll saying open borders is record approval….
They think you are literally are farm animal
Dude, everyone thinks what they believe is true and what others believe is false. In fact that’s the definition of believing something. When I see evidence that most polls have been faked I’ll believe it but that’s not going to be my default position.
Why dont they merge Gallup into the ADL to save costs?
Elon Musk addresses the ‘unite the kingdom’ march crowd via video link – UK politics live
The weirdest thing Ive ever seen in politics aside from a game show host being president is a billionaire adopting far right politics.
Usually billionairs have to be neoliberal right. For their bank account?
I dont get it.
Maybe Elon remember what happened in South Africa.
Once people achieve their economic interests they start advancing their genetic interests. Once Oprah became a billionaire, she endorsed Obama. Once Seinfeld became a billionaire, he endorsed the IDF. Once Musk became a centibillionaire, he endorsed white nationalism.
Isnt it funny the whiter and more “masculine” the Trump admin got, the less competent it was?
Completely expected if you ask me.
Its ultra competent on borders and getting republican policies done.
You could say its way too competent
I think Melo needs to stop pretending he has a soul or cares about anything or has any principles and then he can become better.
If Trump truly does this RICO stuff against Soros hes going to have massive issues.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they announce president JD Vance within a week of a RICO case being brought.
THEY ARE TRYING SO HARD TO MAKE THE SHOOTER A LEFT-WING TRANS PERSON!
lol I know
It’s actually insane how much misinformation is coming out about this guy. Even crazier how much the current admin is repeating that info.
All signs point to this dude being a groyper.
And now it just came out that the “trans’ roommate was not trans and not his lover either.
His roommate is trans-animal so technically trans lol
Jesus Christ.
Yes people who aren’t part of the LGBTQ community talk to and meet primarily with other LGBTQ people, like the numerous trans-identifying people who somehow knew the plan of this shooting when no one else did.
And yes, Groypers would shoot someone who was basically closer to them than anyone on the left… instead of just some “leftist”.
Being an NPC is equivalent to lobotomization.
The point is that the trans community ATTRACTS mentally ill people.
There is literally no evidence that points to him being a groyper.
Ben Shapiro bought TPUSA, Steven Crowder just changed his profile to read “#1 conservative talk show” or whatever, and Charlie Kirk’s wife now has her own thing trying to get money.
Literal grifters.
I would rather Ben Shapiro own it than Nick Fuentes.
Ben Shapiro is easier to beat.
Also, Nick is scrubbing the socials so he isn’t blamed for this.
Kind of suspicious
That’s because Shapiro is on your side.
I’ve seen Charlie Kirk be taken out of context so many times in recent days, it’s no wonder Fuentes would be afraid of that.
Also I don’t know or believe Fuentes is deleting anything, I’m taking what you say at face value. Don’t really care because it’s already confirmed beyond doubt that Tyler’s friends/bf were trans and anti Charlie Kirk.
so you believe tyler did it?
“That’s because Shapiro is on your side.”
Lmao, what?
I believe Tyler may have pulled the trigger but the FBI/Mossad/CIA/etc. knew about the chats before. Israel media, and all the usual suspects (Shapiro) were way too quick on it. If there wasn’t another person shooting Charlie, it was still “planned” and there were likely agents in the group chats of all these discords. You don’t just “plan an attack” with a bunch of evidence and gain no interest, right? Unless these agencies are absolutely useless.
Interesting theory:
https://x.com/WomanDefiner/status/1966589317251301628
In any case it is strange that he says he hasn’t done it, yet clearly he knows these people and could have done it.
PP, I think you should just close comments on this site.
Hey Pumpkin. I was wondering if you could estimate my IQ based on the following tests that I have taken:
GRE (2023): 162 Verbal, 155 Math
SAT (2018): 670 English, 770 Math
Crossword IQ test: 14/17
PATMA: 7/10 first time (after falling asleep in the middle of the test), and 8/10 the second time
Mensa.no: 125
Preliminary evidence suggests a crossword of 14 roughly equates to a verbal IQ of 135 and a PATMA of 7.5 (the first time you were sleep deprived, the second time you had practice so splitting the difference) suggests a math IQ of 127, so the composite score would be something like 134.
Thanks a lot Pumpkin! I was also wondering if you could do a bio-demographic estimation of my IQ as well. I am American, but both my parents are from Pakistan. As you already know, I believe I learned how to read around age 4, but I am not sure when I learned long division.
I think you mean historiometric estimate (calculating from developmental milestones). My biodemographic method is when we calculate based on physical (head size, height, weight etc) and demographic traits (income, education, race, politics, religion etc)
This is so I can see if the bio-demographic estimate is close to the test estimate.
Ah, yes. I meant historiometric estimate.
Not enough data points to give a reliable historiometric estimate
What about your religion Puppy? Do you put that into the model?
Got it. Thanks anyway!
I would add that I believe I learned how to read at age 4 and was learning addition and subtraction in preschool.
When did you learn long division?
I don’t remember, but it would have been either third grade or the summer before it. However, I remember learning 3 digit multiplication in kindergarten, so around the age of 6.
Seriously those Gallup polls are really great. Our finest minds work on creating the data I mean, sampling the data.
The thing is, the Utah Governor, and Trump’s FBI are not credible sources of information.
They have a YUGE incentive to lie, and these boomers/gen Xers absolutely cannot be trusted to accurately parse the political profile of the shooter.
This guy could be fucking trans white boys all he wants and that COULD STILL MEAN HE’S A GROYPER and you would only know that IF YOU WERE KNOWLEDGEABLE IN INTERNET CULTURE.
Release all of his socials and I could tell you what he is IMMEDIATELY!
And here’s the other thing; let’s say this guy turned out to be a black trans lesbian that was 400lbs, what would they mean then?
Why are republicans so bloodthirsty over this? Charlie Kirk was not important enough to be this angry.
They just want justification for authoritarinism.
LITERAL FASCISM.
I’m extremely anti-Israel, but the Israel conspiracies floating around about his death don’t make much sense to me.
Charlie Kirk was a staunch Israel supporter even up to his death. Yeah, he had some criticisms but it’s nothing like, say, Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes. And they’re alive to this day.
Make it make sense. You can’t.
They make sense but that doesn’t mean they’re true. The argument is the one demographic Israel can’t afford to lose is evangelicals and Kirk had huge influence over the young generation of these, so even mild criticism was a threat. And his criticism wasn’t even that mild. He hosted a major event with Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith and even baited mainstream Republicans like Megyn Kelley to link Epstein to Mossad.
Something I noticed about Nick Fuentes is his nose, eyes and eyebrows look almost identical to this one SPED kid I knew in middle school.
It makes sense that he also believes low IQ/Social IQ things like Jewsdidit.
I disagree. I think he has an extremely high IQ & high social IQ, he just has different genetic interests from us because he’s white and we’re hybrids.
I think he’s a gullible moron, and I think he appears like a social genius to you because he has terminally online mannerisms and beliefs. I won’t say he has no social intelligence, though. He can at least read facial expressions to some degree.
Believing in Jewsdidit is not some positive indicator for social IQ. In fact, it’s kind of the opposite because only outcasts unironically believe and say that shit.
Nick Fuentes is actually a pretty anti-social guy.
How is it socially dumb to believe the richest, smartest, most media and politically active ethnic group in America has had a big impact on society? And being a social outcast doesn’t always suggest social dumbness. It could just mean they lack the instinct to follow the group which often leads them to insights that normies miss.
You see Puppy. i told you he was an employee. And you kept denying it.
Hes been reading this blog for 8 years and doesn’t know about jewish power??? Hahaha. Even most leftist podcast hosts are saying the government is run by jews.
Its just ridiculous.
And notice the way he never mentions Gaza. If he was a leftist and for human rights and anti-racism and against fascism….you don’t find it very very weird he had nothing to say about the number 1 left wing issue of our time?
Its like if Charlie Kirk neve mentioning trans.
SUM TING WONG
You see Puppy. i told you he was an employee
No he’s not lol.
“How is it socially dumb to believe the richest, smartest, most media and politically active ethnic group in America has had a big impact on society?”
But that’s not what he believes.
Nick Fuentes does not only believe that Jewish people and organizations lobby for their interests. That is the factually correct, but weaker position that most people would agree with. In reality, he’s like the Bot. He believes that they have extreme control over our entire domestic and foreign policy. Which is not fucking true. They always pivot back to the weaker position when it’s pointed out how ridiculous what they’re saying is.
He did that during his debate with Destiny.
“It could just mean they lack the instinct to follow the group which often leads them to insights that normies miss.”
Right, so anti-social, and anti-normal. That’s lower social intelligence.
Our social IQ stems from our proclivity towards groups.
He believes that they have extreme control over our entire domestic and foreign policy. Which is not fucking true.
What specific policies does he incorrectly blame on Jewish influence?
Our social IQ stems from our proclivity towards groups.
Not entirely
Well, what do we consider “Jewish influence”?
A policy caused by Jewish influence is one that would not have happened had one or more Jews not wanted it.
Hey pp what happened to pumpkinhead? Haven’t seen him here in almost half a decade.
No idea
You know sometimes I think you might be one of their employees too. How many alt right people have you banned here?
Sometimes I think you’re an employee.You see me criticizing Zionist extremists in a rational credible way and thus keep attacking me for not criticizing them enough with the hopes I’ll blow my cred by endorsing your nonsense or get so frustrated I’ll become pro-Zionist. Reverse psychology. Hee hee. Rubs hands
Is Mugabe banned now too?
Of course not!
Actually maybe we need to actually come up with moral IQ testing for society. Normal IQ testing is completely irrelevant these days.
This article by RR is so wrong.
It assumes that language is all there is to intelligence as a “culture tool” that defines everything when solving problems.
Sorry to inform rr but spatial intelligence exists too and you don’t need inner speech to solve spatial problems.
With any tool that isn’t linguistic you need both pattern recognition and an order of priorities for putting things together. Let’s say you want to make an airplane model. Putting it together the right way. First of all you have people that don’t need instructions and you show them an airplane and they build it from scratch. Other people get instructions and they do fine and then some people cannot put it together at all.
Yes you can train some people to do some tasks in a spatial manner but it’s not the same as saying some people will get genius at it.
I can for instance do the highest level puzzles they have in the toy store. Where you take apart and put back together 3D shaped pieces. But this isn’t the most advanced you can do. They still are toys after all.
Genius people in spatial intelligence tasks understand how to build car engines all by themselves or jet engines or any mechanical thing you can think of.
I can barely hold 4 – 5 numbers in my head at a time. And I don’t talk to myself, inner speech is not how I solve problems. I just look at the object and understand where things have to go and which parts need to go firstly in whatever order they need to be placed in. I only talk externally when I need to explain what I have done to someone else but nothing is happening inside my head. I am not using any cultural tools for knowing where all the parts go but I am using my vision system.
Development also does not exist nowhere. Without a brain to store and proces vision we have nowhere to remember the spatial procedures we developed and learned things be impossible. RR keep saying “buh reductionism”, no you need a place to store development i.e. that brain or you’d forget everything. Memory exists somewhere inside the person.
So you develop a skill, where is that stored? The brain or the child has nothing to remember. It’s not in the foot or spleen. It’s in memory in the brain in vision areas. And same for executive function. Kids development requires a brain or you have a kid learn then forget and that’s not possible. It’s not pixie dust, the brain changes to store culture tools but vision system and executive function need it to see everything going together. That’s not just linguistics. The vision system is highly complicated to do what it does without language and its intelligence doesn’t depend on language but on all of what it can see to create stuff.
So a genius vision spatial person can see more and make physical tools with more parts than a non genius who can not deal will everything all at once. They don’t need inner speech for each part. They see it and it gets put in the right spot in the correct order. That’s quantifiable because objectively objects have many parts. The more you can put together the more genius you are. And only a few people can do it without training.
I have problems with computer code because I can’t do language well. But I have seen video games and movies so I reversed engineered how it would work I just cannot memorize the coding schema just as I cannot memorize numbers larger than 5 digits. And copy paste office work is gard to do for me. That doesn’t mean I am not intelligent in spatial tasks. Language is linear, I know what goes into a physics engine in a computer. Books don’t exist that show you what to do they tell you and that doesn’t work for me.
But I know language is not the end all be all of intelligence. It’s not a symbolic tool, intelligence is seeing it work before it’s created. Not training. You cannot train people to visually see more than what they can in their full potential. That means some will have more spatial abilities than others. Language cannot do what spatial can and that’s the mistake calling intelligence just inner speech. Spatial intelligence creates real non abstract physical tools like in industrial manufacturing not just linguistic cultural tools with limited cultural conventions as symbols.
Interesting study.
Politics and IQ: Are liberals smarter than conservatives?
‘ It found that higher verbal intelligence was associated with more socially liberal views, such as support for abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights. At the same time, higher verbal intelligence was also linked to more “economically liberal” views, a te
rm used in the classical sense to mean support for free-market principles and less government intervention. This is what is more commonly known today as economic conservatism. The study suggested that the higher intelligence of economically conservative Republicans might compensate for the potentially lower intelligence of socially conservative ones, leading to the small overall Republican advantage.’