If AI just regurgitates and recombines human knowledge, does that make it dumber than us? Not necessarily because we humans also just regurgitates and recombine what we’ve learned from other humans. Has even the most brilliant human ever discovered anything that is not in some way a synthesis of what other humans or pre-humans already knew?
But then how will we know when AI is smarter than us? When it beats us on IQ tests? It already does in the skills it’s been trained on like verbal and mathematical reasoning but scores poorly in many other tasks. But then even the dumbest of humans would score high on an IQ test if endlessly trained. So how will we know when AI is truly smarter than us, and it’s not just an artifact of teaching to the test or mirroring our own intelligence back at us? This very brief video will tell you.
Pumpkin Person 
Machines (eg, “AI”/LLMs) aren’t agents because for a thing to be an agent it has to be able to formulate intentions and necessarily have an irreducible first-personal perspective. Since machines lack an irreducible first-personal perspective, then machines aren’t agents. If machines aren’t agents, then machines lack mind. Therefore, if machines aren’t agents and machines lack minds, then machines cannot be “smarter than us.”
Click to access baker_lynne-why_computers_cant_act.pdf
You yourself define intelligence as intentional. If it is intentional, then “AI” can’t be smarter than us since it cannot intend. Since intentionality is (should be) inherent to any definition of intelligence, then “AI” can’t ever be smarter than us.
Intelligence evolved to get us what we intend so that’s a convenient way to define it. AI doesn’t have intention because it doesn’t have emotion or consciousness, but it does have the functional equivalent of intention which is whatever function it was programmed to perform. In the same way our own intentions are shaped by what evolution selected for (money, sex, power, survival, tribalism etc). You can think of natural selection as the programmer for humans.
“which is whatever function it was programmed to perform”
So? I’ve seen people complaining about the GPT 5 update and how it talks back. I’ve seen people complain about how LLMs always give positive reinforcement and feedback. “Why did they change this in that update!” Things like that should lead one to the conclusion that LLMs aren’t intelligent.
If LLMs lack emotion and consciousness, then it can’t be intelligent.
Intelligence is your ability to solve any problem you have. AI doesn’t have any problems since it has no emotion & thus no suffering but it can be programmed to try to solve any problem we give it & the degree to which it can is a measure of intelligence
This reminds me of when you argued bacteria is intelligent. It has no emotion or consciousness too
That’s true. RR, used to argue that single cells were “intelligent.” Now he thinks only humans can have minds.
And to be clear although I think AI has some intelligence (not sure how much) I don’t think it has a mind since a mind also implies emotion & consciousness
There is two types of intelligence referenced here. Computative intelligence on already existing information using already existing systems to compute state transitions and such, and generative systems that could potentially change the overall makeup of reality (i.e. free will determining the contingencies of matter and spacetime and what forms matter can take).
Remember this is different from the combination or coherence problem about coherence between either multiple types of information or information (conscious experiences) over time.
obviously binary logic gates have neither coherence nor generative capacity.
the agential aspect or first-person aspect explained by RR is just another framing of generation necessitating specific first-person desires to choose between multiple possible futures (think quantum collapse) as agency, with the first-person aspect just being attachment to specific information processing as an experience.
the role of the anterior cingulate cortex is to learn what options have whatever consequences.
Choosing between multiple futures depend on the agents experience of going down the right pathway in the past creating the values it wants. Then it can evaluate the futures it knows is best.
i have incorporated quantum mechanics in my a.i. designs, it’s not unfamiliar to me how that works
“Intelligence is your ability to solve any problem you have. AI doesn’t have any problems since it has no emotion & thus no suffering”
I agree with this.
“This reminds me of when you argued bacteria is intelligent. It has no emotion or consciousness too”
“That’s true. RR, used to argue that single cells were “intelligent.” Now he thinks only humans can have minds.”
Right. That was almost 10 years ago though. My views have been refined a lot since then.
Funny how we’ve been arguing about this for like 8 years now and we agree on something like this.
So do you disagree with Dennis Noble that “intelligent cells” are the active causes and use genes as “slaves?”
I mean, cells can sense environmental signals, integrate information and adjust their behavior. They can clearly adapt—so this aligns somewhat 2kth PP’s definition. They use genes as passive tools to carry out certain processes.
Will elaborate later, phone about to die.
The smartest large language models have been more intelligent than most humans for at least several years. This should not be news. The final barrier is between most humans and the small proportion of humans intelligent enough to make significant advances. I believe surmounting that barrier will require a qualitative leap that won’t happen for decades, at least.
If they’re more intelligent than most humans, do you think they could survive if all humans left the planet? For how long? We survived for hundreds of thousands of years.
I really hate fucking saying this but maybe RR is right these official IQ tests don’t measure intelligence anymore.
If a bot trained in stats to pick the most likely shape or word is scoring well. Then its not really an intelligence metric. Youre measuring more the intelligence of the creators of the bot.
Puppy asks…ask chatgpt a question and see if it can’t respond.
Here is what i asked:
Does Israel control the United States?ChatGPT said:
No, Israel does not control the United States.Here’s a clear breakdown:1. Sovereignty and Political Structure
2. U.S.-Israel Relationship
3. Influence ≠ Control
—————————————————–
Thats basically the answer a midwit or college level person says. If I ask my teachers in school, the college professsors and ‘people who take newspapers really seriously’…
they give you that word cel answer.
If someone with very superior VIQ sees this answer, he will see logical holes.
This support stems from a combination of shared democratic values, strategic interests in the Middle East,
Uh…why is the US obsessed with the middle east? It prodcues more oil than most mid east countries etc etc. General knowledge
Influence ≠ Control
Did a jew actually make chatgpt say this. A robot wouldn’t say this. This is a lawyer/jew type dodge.
Decisions in U.S. foreign and domestic policy are made by elected officials accountable to American voters—not to any foreign government.
Zero social intelligence. etcetc
If someone has to say something controversial to score high, it’s not an appropriate test of intelligence, social or otherwise.
Its a matter of fact or intelligence to know the fact.
If youre not intelligent enough to know it.
Then youre probably….a bot
you can be intelligent enough
but it requires exposure to the facts
pill don’t know certain math facts, he must be a bot?
or in pill mind: no one knows what I know, so I pill am the only intelligent person on earth
in other words pill is egotistical and cannot accept others are intelligent
What is a neoconservative?
A neoconservative (often shortened to neocon) is a political term that typically refers to someone who supports:
A belief in American exceptionalism?
What?
WHat?
WHAT?
Thyre fucking rigging it again.
No web crawler not trawling through anything later than 2002 is going to say that.
many early neoconservatives were former liberals or leftists (especially in the 1960s–1970s) who became disillusioned with what they saw
Uh…they were ex communists who fled Stalin when they lost the ‘struggle’. Trotsky was their totem. they are ‘left wing’ in the 60s in the same way they are ‘right wing’ over the past 20 years.
those questions are easy for mossad gpt to come up with. i meant questions that even the dumbest, most autistic, most politically correct human could answer correctly but the bot can’t.
ask it a spatial question
bots do not understand objects in space what they can do or not do
then who cares about strasserism?
only mossad gpt apparently.
but YES!
strasserism as a thing and not just two brothers mightn’t care.
BUT for a very different reason the hitlerites wouldn’t care.
peepee/pill: wuhchootalkinboutwillis?
mugabe: the hitlerites didn’t care about jews because their blood. the strasserites didn’t care about jews because their blood.
peepee/pill: wuhchootalkinboutwillis? contradictory! anal philosophy!
—————————————
WHat is this shit?
Strasserites were as HBD aware as HItler people. THis was mainstream science in the early 20th century. Jews were studied like everyone else.
The science was crude. OFten they referred to jews as ‘asiatic’ or some sort.
There is zero doubt the Strassers would have enjoyed the night of the long knives.
Stop being a stupid person. Youre trying to do this carve out to ‘protect’ the sanctity of Strassers.
You could protect them by saying they were right about race, just like econ.
Anyways, if you want to carve out econ into some sort of ‘domain with circular equations’ then youre fucking retarded.
Obviously all of econ has to do with race. Race is the number 1 most important factor in econ growth, corruption levels, control of finance, etc etc.
If you want to carve out and say ‘human beings are individual bots’ then sit with the retards in libertarian-ville. Wack off to anime porn.
We need adults. We don;t need kids.
If an economics textbook spent 50% of the time explaing why racial differences influce human behaviour. That would be more economics, then doing a PHD in auction theory with your triple integrals and differential bollocks.
We need answers. Not puzzles.
ANSWERS. NOT PUZZLES.
If I want puzzles. I play video games.
Right. People die wanting life to be one long puzzle. If you have answers, you have something to strive for. If you have puzzles, you have things like “Will this guy be a non-parasitic force on society in the long-run? Let’s find out!” and live their life around barely evolved homo habilis’s because they believe in “equality” or even a “meritocracy” based on (professed, not actualized) values.
If they want a meritocracy maybe they need to start mass murdering every corrupt government official and CEO and banker that has manipulated our global economy and immigration for hundreds of years. Then, you could actually do something amazing: Let people be free, in the countries they were historically from, or built (or are capable of maintaining, and yes, this opens a new can of worms and new “puzzle” to solve!… for brainiac libtards who think inefficient slave labor or ethnic food is what creates and maintains great societies).
Same with crime. Economics textbooks never mention crime. Its an assumption everyone follows the law, because its not rational to not….
Uh, corruption is a crime? Is it not?
Cartels are a crime? Is it not?
A paramedic price gouging a heart attack victim..is a crime?
For most of christian european history, usury was a crime? Is it not?
Gambling is considered a crime. Even in some western countries e.g. Ireland has no casinos.
Etc.
Anyone want to ask chatgpt how black behaviour effects economic growth via crime?
Ask it.
“That would be an ecumenical matter”.
Father Ted | An Ecumenical Matter
^^this is chatgpt
Uh, Irish are the best comedians!
Best of Father Dougal – Father Ted
That things that don’t exist chart joke….hahahaha.
“Non catholic gods”
Hahaha.
Tarantino has a home in tel Aviv. I think we can safely discard his opinions…
Really?
Wow
>Has even the most brilliant human ever discovered anything that is not in some way a synthesis of what other humans or pre-humans already knew?
Yes. It’s always weird to me when people propose that all discovery must be recombination, so confidently, when all it would take to disprove it is a single obvious counterexample. An easy example is the first time a human ancestor stumbled across a piece of gold. You’d have to deconstruct the idea to the point of uselessness to argue that that would be recombination, at which point you’re only hurting your own ability to perceive reality.
I meant discovering ideas not physical objects
The idea of gold came from discovering the object.
Fair point. But I assume a lot of the greatest scientific leaps did not rely on new info but new ways of combining old info
There isn’t much difference between noticing a piece of gold and noticing that your voltmeter jumps for a moment when you move a magnet near your circuit. Both are cases of discovery.
you need to have ideas never thought of before pumpkin
e = 2.718…
eular discovered this number by himself before anyone else
its easy to say, just recombine shit and you get cake but shit is shit and recommendation does not improve it.
if you make stuff up that’s useful as example the computer – turing and von Neumann made the universal computer. The ideas did not come from shit in the toilet recombining different colors in the toilet. No, it was original. But people don’t understand that these people had 170 IQ – smelling different toilets at any lower IQ does get you anything. Intelligent people make up new ideas all the time. But people don’t understand how it happens.
You see that high IQ people don’t just recombine small things they can think in The fourth dimension and with 16 objects of thought at the same time. They don’t throw crap at the wall they make the mona Lisa. Recombination by crap at the wall never produced anything new. The high IQ are different people and why 140 IQ people like Sam Altman can only make chatbots not Jarvis (Ironmans a.i. system)
Von Neumann pretty much stole Neumann architecture from J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly, apparently. So always remember sometimes a key to being super smart is being around other intelligent people and stealing their ideas and letting others sing your praises. (Just kidding)
My belief is that is didn’t come from a toilet is all I am saying.
Anyone can “recombine” anything but shit + shit = shit
Intelligence is more that that.
If intelligence were simply that then why are chimps so stupid? They can combine things? At least homo erectus made hand ax and fire.
As for the original question, we’ll know AI is smarter than us when it outperforms us on most g-loaded cognitive tasks. Simple as.
It outperforms us on anything it’s been trained to death on but on but is useless on stuff it hasn’t been trained on
Sounds like it outperforms us on some g-loaded tasks but not most.
I used the gold example first because it’s simpler, to avoid needless tangents about definitions, but if you examine the discovery of electromagnetic induction it follows the same process. Somebody was the first to be in a position to see something nobody had ever seen before, and had the capacity to recognize it as such. Some of this was recombination, such as the human ancestor plodding on his feet with working eyes along like so many others had done, but there was a new element too: the actual existence of the gold that no one else had previously seen.
Will be interesting if AI ever does anything on that scale. There is a philosopher who says scientific discovery will be the true test of AI intelligence
99.9% of life survive without intelligence, survival does not create human intelligence all the time. This has been done in genetic algorithms where you never get intelligent life forms inside computers for decades.
Only if you understand the brain can you make intelligent a.i. programs. You’d need to make a brain more intelligent than any human brain under certain control principles. But the most important thing about agents is they need socialization or they have no purpose in life.
creating a.i. smarter than us means giving them a family because social knowledge is transfered that is more complex than text on the internet. The a.i. needs hugs and love or it will not know what to do with its intelligence. This requires a special environment for brain control. (Frontal lobes are a critical component)
a.i. that have dirty rooms for example
jordan Peterson gives good advice
clean up your room and this is the first step to getting your life together
Having a clean room means you can get a girlfriend later
its about executive function
and family structure
Think of it this way.
In the Invader Zim episode “abducted” Zim is abducted by aliens as tall as the humans. They disguised their ship as a whale floating in the air. They wanted to experiment on Zim so they taped a juice box to his head. Zim escaped and the two aliens bicker over if the juice box made him more powerful so he could escape. Later he told his leaders that these aliens were tall but stupider than the humans.
Just because you can “recombine” things don’t mean you are intelligent.
I could tape a juice box to my dog but that is stupid. It’s not useful or interesting to do.
Intelligent people understand that what they make has a purpose and can do useful stuff.
a.i. as I understand it can do interesting things like make technology. The only problem is that I don’t have computer skills or I have made one by now. This Australian man who made the animated King Kong animal in the 2005 film made a baby in the computer that can play games and read pictures. He did this in 2013
Pingback: Creativity beyond pure recombination | Aeoli Pera
What do you think about this guy’s video, PP? He lives in Canada. It was trending on my Youtube feed.
one thing (((the philosopher))) personality should appreciate is there are no great jewish philosophers except for marx and maimonides.
but (((the philosopher))) personality boosts spinoza because neocon secular ultra-zionist jew.
sad.
(((the philosopher))) personality: it’s like our rulers think we’re morons.
mugabe: it’s like mossad thinks peepee is a moron. sad.
ban pill until he REPENTS!
maybe sometimes burning pipo alive was justified.
sad.
You seem to hate philosophers that criticise religion. you need to reflect on that.
name one besides (((spinoza))) peepee.
why are rabble-rouser, populist, and demagogue pejorative?
but democracy is a eupheme?
these questions will go un-answered because i am the only non-peepee commenter.
hint: slavery wasn’t and isn’t black and slavery never ended.
peepee: how dare you racism. i love being brainwashed.
mugabe: sad!
Comments like these are why you’re retarded.
Comments like these are why you’re retarded.
EXACTLY!
SAD!
melo personality hates democracy. unless peepee gets some other non-peepee commenters, i may have to suddenly stop commenting forever. SAD!
“ may have to suddenly stop commenting forever”
Please don’t threaten me with a good time.
“Goated” comments like this are why Mugabe definitely has a 130+ IQ.
thanks peepee. but you still need to have actual commenters sadly.
Wipe your chin, bro
peepee: i HEART the cosmos. atheism is the coolest.
mugabe: SAD! one reason. reason is the wrong word. one TOTALLY OBVIOUS PROOF that vulgar materialism is gay and retarded is
peepee: is what?
mugabe: EVIL! straight-up, no conceivable explanation, EVIL!
THE METAPHYSICAL MEANING OF WOODLAND CRITTERS.
that last of secretariat’s four pipo died recently, ron turcotte. it was news. why?
peepee: he’s famous because his IQ was higher than other jockeys’.
mugabe: sad! he’s not the greatest jockey of all time, he just had the freakish luck to ride the greatest horse of all time.
peepee: shut up racist!
all of his four pipo have wikipedia entries, including eddie sweat. they got lucky.
the guy who played sweat in the movie died from DTs according to wikipedia.
maybe. when mugabe stops drinking it’s very unpleasant for three days then it’s very not okay forever.
“do you shake?” axed mugabe’s doctor.
never.
just another example of how when pipo talk about alcoholism they habitually DON’T take into account the ENORMOUS variation in how alcohol affects pipo.
and it’s NOT just alcoholism. it even includes heroin. and so much else where the average is taken for the thing. aka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_fallacy.
peepee is angry because she looks like a monkey.
just accept it peepee. stop being angry. stop saying things like “denzel is the secretariat of human ugliness.”
tobias schneebaum accepted his ugliness, and he was a gay jew.
btw, two moives peepe should watch are: The Grammar of Happiness and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keep_the_River_on_Your_Right:_A_Modern_Cannibal_Tale
heroin: burroughs was a junkie forever. he died at 83.
it was actually a psychiatrist who told me this.
peepee: told you what?
mugabe: the physical harm of drugs of addiction is mostly NOT cause and effect but just association.
Addiction is usually co morbid with other issues in a persons life. Could be something like chronic back pain or some sort of abuse in childhood.
I’ve never been addicted to anything. I thought I was addicted to video gaming but Ive stopped it many times for years at a go just like that.
I do pity people who have those genetics/tendencies.
As the neoliberals (and their libertarian puppets) keep saying: addiction makes us ready to engage in free market captialism more fully!
If you wanna do hard drugs, and alcohol Mugabe that’s fine. You don’t have to sit here and justify it to us.
GET SOME ACTUAL COMMENTERS PEEPEE!
ESPECIALLY ONES WHOSE NATIVE LANGUAGE IS ENGLISH!
it is curious that melo and pill and lurker are all functionally illiterate in english. thus they can’t unnuhstan any of my comments.
SAD!
Its interesting that mugabe can open his mind up to the idea of addiction being ‘a thing that exists in other peoples minds’ but not mental illness or some neurological items.
Interesting.
Im not woke by any means…but Im open to the idea some people think they are the opposite sex.
It could be mental illness.
It could be something else.
Mugabe is right that a lot of jewish philosophy most recently (i.e. past 150 years) is basically legal studies.
So Kripke, Wittgenstein, Derrida, Ayer etc are basically dictionary studies people.
People that write about theology are closer to philosophy than these clowns like Bruno and Anime. Their role is to stop high VIQ people saying anything. I call it ‘sandbagging’ in academia. Marx would have agreed with me if he lived in the 20th century.
Legit modern jewish philosophers? Popper is legit. I think Rand’s ideas are garbage, but they are a philosophy. Husserl, Berlin, Adorno are legit.
I disagree with most of these people btw, but at least they are putting soemthing out there.
The main problem i have with analytical philosopher or theology profs, or even people from science/econ/psych that masquerade as ‘philosophers’ is they don’t say anything about being human/existence. Either positive-ist or normative-ist.
I don’t really care about making langugage more efficient or whether zionism is ‘revealed’ or not.
Milton Friedman saying everyone is a machine that consumes, isn’t philosophy. Its an assumption to a statistical model etc.
I would guess ashkenazim talk actual philosophy among themselves. But don’t publish it. We can just infer what they think or hold to be true from their actions. [redacted by pp, Aug 25, 2025]
I would guess Jon ‘Stewart’ would be great to talk to about philosophy actually. You can see the social intelligence and ‘reflective’ nature.
I would guess therefore, hes HBD aware.
Michael Tomasky wrote a great article arguing trump is the most racist president since Woodrow Wilson.
100% correct. Thats why I endorsed trump fully in 2016 and should he run again in 2028, will endorse against Kamala/Buttigieg/Turnip.
For me that translates to: ‘Trump is the most intelligent president since Woodrow Wilson’.
Obviously Tomasky sees racism as a sign of lower intelligence, whereas Im the polar opposite. I see it as a sign of being immune to jewish mind control rays, and therefore very superior intelligence (of some sort, not necessarily academic intelligence)
Now Puppy will say: Woodrow Wilson was a degenrate hillbilly Irish traveller…..
Uh, Puppy….Woodrow Wilson was considered the poster boy for liberalism in his day Hahha
Puppy: But but but, how can someone be a liberal and be racist?
Call Centre Worker: Maybe you need to reflect on whether being a racist has anything to do with being a liberal? Teddy Roosevelt was considered a progressive. Lincoln was a hardcore liberal for his day…none of these people would want their kids to go to school with blacks.
I see it as a sign of being immune to jewish mind control rays
Then why is he the most pro-Israel President in American history (other than Bush)? Is he being blackmailed? Then he’s controlled.
If I was stunted like puppy and anime and couldn’t figure out anything using intuition, I would basically make an assumption that Im wrong about human behaviour until proven otherwise.
For example.
I’m wrong about blacks.
Dude, for ten years you didn’t even have the intuition to realize your Goddess Marsha was actually me, so objectively it’s you who needs to assume he’s wrong about human behavior until proven otherwise.
I always thought steve jobs must have been jewish because of his personality. But its not true.
Wait a second. None of the founders of Microsoft or Apple were jews. Weird.
Sometimes I try to imagine what its like to be autistic. I imagine getting excited by a telephone book or a license plate. Its very hard to be honest.
I think about someone asking me what a neocon is? And then I recite the dictionary (the entirety of which I memorised by heart).
Mugabe is the same. ‘Corruption’ is legal because its not ‘spelled out’ in statute’. The founders didn’t write ‘corruption be bad, yo’ in Article 1.
Then a clever neocon like Swank will say ‘corruption is wrong if a gentile does it against Zion. But good, if Zion does it against gentiles’
And Mugabe will roll with it.
When Mugabe wrote campaign finance should be totally deregulated I felt he should have been deported to a kibbutz in Israel and chained to a log there.
He can live out the rest of his days under his preferred ideal of an unwritten consitution where people make it up as they go along. Depending on the weather. Soil temperature. Ocean acidity. That type of thing
his preferred ideal of an unwritten consitution where people make it up as they go along
no. that’s YOUR ideal!
this personality is too jewish too be real peepee.
get some actual commenters!
Oh. Trump is firing lisa cook the nice black woman from the Fed.
Its funny. Lisa probably knows more about actual econ than most neoliberals.
I find that very sad.
The roman empire fell so low, the slaves where more roman than the patricians by the end.
Lets be ultra real.
IF the constitution, Article 1 said ‘corruption be seriously bad, yo. That shit be banned and like, death penalty forever’.
They would bribe the justices to ‘reinterperet’ to mean corruption is legal.
And mugabe would say: Great decision.
So mugabe….have you heard about Magnum Force?
WOW! PEEPEE JUST BANNED ME AGAIN.
SAD!
SCOTUS would instantly strike down drumpf’s flag burning order 9 to 0.
but what will happen is it will never be enforced or a lower court will rule it retarded and SCOTUS will refuse any appeals.
AND FOR THE SAME REASON IT RULED IN CITIZENS UNITED.
PILL CANNOT UNNUHSTAN FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
AS CHOMSKY SAID: I CONCLUDED THAT FRENCH INTELLECTUALS ARE LITERALLY INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
SAD!
Unfortunately the US flag is being more representative of Zionism and Big Tech globohomo nowadays, which makes this ruling not that useful.
Youre a fucking clown. Nobody cares about flags. But If they burn the Israel flag, you will be arrested.
Thats frivolous.
Not having a democracy is substance.
Not having a functioning government is substance.
Not having a justice system is substance.
Thats citizens united.
the US has never been a democracy. duh. it has always been a dictatorship of capital, as it was INTENDED to be by the authors of its constitution.
pill personality is too stupid to be allowed to comment anymore.
sad.
pill thinks judges shouldn’t follow the law, they should follow their hearts and legislate from the bench.
well, in that 5-4 decision the “conservatives” were the 5, and the “liberals” were the 4. the problem is the dem party which appoints liberal judges is just as corrupt as the GOP. derrr!
btw, hate crime enhancements and the fighting words exception are both very suspicious and i expect will be ruled unconstitutional eventually as they should be.
this doesn’t mean motive can’t be taken into account at sentencing. it only means there can’t be laws saying, more time for pipo whose motives we especially don’t like.
so-called fighting words are not the same as a so-called true threat btw and under brandenberg i think malema’s singing kill the boer would be illegal even if ZA had US law. the reason being there actually has been a lot of killing of boers, white farmers. like A LOT!
so if a mob boss is taped saying “kill him”, he can’t claim he was just talking.
Trumps press conference tonight…hes convinced me hes the most competent president in 50 years. I was very dubious until now. The guy is a genius communicator.
You know i think my social intelligence is adequate. But I can’t tell if trump was spending 40 mins trolling or being serious
Trump’s EVIL Plan For Kilmar Abrego Garcia Leaks | The Kyle Kulinski Show
I laughed so hard at this story i literally had tears in my eyes. When I found out they offered a plea deal to a prison in Costa Rica and when he rejected, and when Kyle said , so theyre going to send him….
to fucking africa…uganda
I lost it.
I couldn’t stop laughing. I think my neighbours heard it.
if you can’t unnuhstan why SCOTUS made the decision it did in citizens united and say “corruption n shit muhfugguh”, then your social intelligence is LOW!
https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolabmoreperfect/episodes/citizens-united
it’s as if you think there was no campaign finance when the constitution was written. or as if you think the guys who wrote the constitution were a bunch of irish travellers, instead of a bunch of rich, greedy cunts.
SAD!
and your neighbors are hasidim like yourself.
SAD!
“just confuse the goyim and then israel can keep existing.” — pill
pill thinks goyim are no better than cattle. nazis think jews are less than cattle.
i. b. singer was a nazi when he said: FOR THE ANIMALS IT IS AN ENDLESS TREBLINKA.
In The Letter Writer, Singer wrote “In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for the animals, it is an eternal Treblinka,”[54] which became a classic reference in the comparison of animal exploitation with the Holocaust.[55]
pill: how dare you. anti-semitism!
mugabe: SAD!
it may seem BIZARRE today that the one regime which CHAMPIONED animal rights also murdered vast number of humans.
BUT!
In May, when the supreme court’s conservative majority ruled that the president could fire members of other independent agencies without cause, they rejected the argument that allowing him to do so would also permit him to replace members of the Federal Reserve.
I told you. I said it a few weeks ago. Even neoliberals and neocons don’t want a corrupt central bank. Its literally the only agency they wont allow clowns or paedos in.
And its because in a ‘free market’ dungeons and dragons system, controlling the monopoly money pretend incentive system opens up a big can of worms.
If you poll all the Wall St neocons, literally 99% don’t want a corrupt central bank.
Everything else, including the supreme court can be a puppet show.
Its interesting studying central banking under dictatorships/communist systems as well. Its actually more opaque to study than under ‘independent’ central banking in ‘capitalist’ systems.
They all tend to reject gold standard obviously.
You don’t need to read David Graeber to see the amount of waste and artificial scarcity there is for non-neoliberals in the systme. I mena, you can read it as a ‘bottom up’ peasent’s eye view of the Kafka Nightmare.
But really, all you have to do is see that money is infinite and as long as people can create credit/bondage with it or ‘prompt’ someone to do something, the onyl scarcity its the hands and legs of people.
I think you could argue this is a type of Labour Theory of Value. As in, the exchange medium of monopoly money is artificial and rigged.
Theres a group of people that argue that you can just fuse monetary and fiscal policy and just forget about an independent central bank.
Modern Monetary Theory.
Its interesting but Im not sure about it.
Obviously it has existed a lot in history to mixed results.
Empirics is interesting to me.
You say ‘this system leads to this outcome’. ‘this law leads to this variable’.
But you could say: That wasn’t bad design. It was bad execution.
And you need intuition there sometimes when looking at these various empirics.
The autistic people can only see x touches y.
I think jews are too intelligent to fall for BS empirics. You can show them ‘x leads to y’ and they’ll have the ‘notion’ that maybe x wasn’t done right in their mind.
Its like when medium IQ political analysts said Republicans lost to Obama because they didn’t embrace minorities/open borders and Sailer said, ‘actually, they need to embrace racism harder, and better’.
I think this type of thinking is something you can’t teach. And some people are just born with it. A kind of ‘funny feeling’.
I can’t explain alot of my analysis. And puppy says: youre going from ‘low IQ instinct’ or ‘without evidence’ or ‘without an equation’.
Youre right. I just feel it. And thats why im not a slave. And you are.
But you are a slave you worship Jews i stand up for the underdogs
The reason you love intuition is it can’t be proven so no can prove how dumb you are lol
I mean you can definitely prove it. He’s wrong regardless of what he believes.
If I had to rely on empirics, teachers, priests, holy books, ‘the data’, ‘the science’, parents, CNN, etc.
I would literally be donating money to africa right now and criticising Cenk for being anti semetic.
I’d probably have a perfectly square haircut and never have been fired.
Lmao I would 100% vote for Stephen A. Smith.
He would be the lowest IQ president of all time. But it would be funny to watch republicans lose their minds over a black guy being in office again.
Its funny. Mark robinson is black and has 3000 IQ points on stephen smith. And you ignore him.